Poor matchmaking. EXCESSIVE DETRACKING.Too many non damaging (failed) shots (75% Tier 1-7 ) and Crits. Coded (RNG) for failure. Can't RELY on GUN or choose instances or kick poor players. Too many tanks on too small map. Excessive "stuck" in terrain. No combat log. No interactive minimap. Hi tier artillery overpowered. Scouting role suicide. You can buy XP & tier 8 tanks & skip lower levels. Post negative on forum they BAN you. Tier 8-10 play takes cash to break even. PLAY FREE...DON'T PAY.
@F1zzzy90 Well that's true x) But statement ''none of the tanks in World of Tanks is WW1...'' isn't quite true :) Guess I was just being a nitpicker :P
Poor matchmaking. EXCESSIVE DETRACKING.Too many non damaging shots (75% Tier 1-7 ). Can't kick poor players. Excessive "stuck" in terrain. No combat log. Hi tier artillery overpowered. Scouting role suicide. You can buy XP and tier 8 tanks & skip lower levels. Forums censored. Post negative forum comments they will BAN you. Non interactive minimap. Tier 8-10 play takes cash to break even. PLAY FREE...DON'T SPEND MONEY.
Poor matchmaking. Too many non damaging shots (75% nondamaging Tier 1-7 ). Can't kick poor players. Excessive "stuck" in terrain. No combat log. Artillery & Russian tanks overpowered. Scouting role is suicide. You can buy XP. You can buy tier 8 tanks & skip lower levels. Forums censored. Post negative forum comments they will BAN you. Non interactive minimap. Tier 8-10 play takes cash to break even. PLAY FREE...DON'T SPEND MONEY.
@Fudbot i doubt they will include japanese or italian tanks. Mostley because they wernt ever big players in terms of tank battles. I dont think the japanese even made heavy tanks in any significant numbers.
@pheetay13 in real germans who made them lose in first place ! and without help of god europe now should be some Germans settlement just like Palestine right now !
and USSR couldn't beat them ,but they had good luck that there was winter season which killed a lot from german army !
@qusaisaher The USSR could and did defeat the Germany. Blitzkrieg didn't work in the cities and the Russian commanders were better at fighting block by block. The Russians also had way more men(after the battle of Kursk the Russians replaced their hundreds of thousands of casualties instantly while the Germans could not replace their experienced men) ,support from the US and Britain and were only fighting on one front. The Russian winter played only a small part in the defeat of Germany.
@pheetay13 Actually, the winter played a huge part. Thousands of men were killed and machinery seized up or got bogged down, or lost in snow drifts. Sometimes it went as low as -60 C, without winter kit that's Hell on Earth. Men froze to death sitting up.
@jeebateeba56 Its not really a fact, it's more of a matter of opinion on how much the winter affected the conflict. I see your point, and I probably should have said that it was not the only factor rather than just a small part. I simply was trying to explain to qusaisaher (who need to work on his grammar) that it was not god that allowed the Russians to defeat the Germans.
@pheetay13 if britain and america didnt get involved in WW2 the germans would have had a lot more soldiers to fight on the eastern front... the russians only won because of fater production and manpower
@F1zzzy90 I know that, but that's besides the point. US and Britain getting involved was inevitable anyway. I was simply saying that the Russian winter was not the sole cause of the Germans defeat in WW2.
@pheetay13 The Russians lost many, many more men than the Germans in WWII. While the Germans did get beaten back by the Soviets, the efficiency on a soldier by soldier basis was hugely in favor of the German army. The Soviet strategy basically consisted of throwing away as many men as it took to take a position.
@bandjohn00 I know that and I agree with you. That wasn't the point of my comment.
The Russians did not have the training, equipment or artillery/armour/air support that the Germans had, but they had numbers and the ability to replenish then, and they used it to their advantage.
@pheetay13 Don't forget that Stalin was the commander, and if he had let his officers and generals to lead the army they would might not lost that many during WW2.
@pheetay13 the winter actually played a major role, german tanks and soldiers not being adapted to those kinds of temperature. And there were a lot more downsides, but there was only germany vs ussr germany would ve won no doubt.
@rune4help@chamagurka Didn't want to type 3 replies. Firstly Stalin being the commander in chief is irrelevant, the Russians won anyway. Secondly getting to Moscow does not mean they would have won, Russia is big place. Napoleon got to Moscow. Did he win? The German advance was stopped by Stalingrad and Kursk, the Russians were the first army to stop the Blitzkrieg, and that was before the winter really set in.
@pheetay13 so when I talk about Russian logistics, I especially mean its railroads - all lines led to Moscow and none of the lines used the same track widths, so transferring lines was a bitch - that's why when Russia declared war in 1914, Germany attacked its ally, France (see Schlieffen Plan). Anyways, you also think taking Moscow meant jack shit - disagree: taking the capital city of the USSR in 1941 would have destroyed the Soviet organization. The nation would have collapsed politically.
@KamikazeHunter1944 What I have been trying to basically say (my arguments have been kind of disjointed) is that Germany did not lose simply because of the winter ruining their invasion, but because they were not properly prepared for an invasion of Russia. I think that Germany's greatest mistake was invading Russia when they did. I still disagree about Moscow, using the Napoleon reference again, he believed that taking Moscow would cause the Russian government to collapse, but it did not.
@KamikazeHunter1944 But I do agree that I have minimized the importance of the Winter. I think that rather than causing the defeat of Germany, it sped it up. As you said, Blitzkrieg was ineffective in Russia, so the Germans should have adapted. While I understand your WW1 reference (btw Germany declared war not Russia), Russia in 1914 was centuries behind Russia in 1941 in terms of industrialization. Germany attacked France as they thought that could defeat France before Russia mobilized.
@pheetay13 No no sorry I misplaced my timing and point - WWI was to show the Schlieffen plan to show the poor militarization capabilities of Russia because of the infrastructure; That, combined with the purges, still applied in '41. That's the WWI reference. And you're completely right - Germany didn't prepare for Winter, but the timing for the fight was adequate - perhaps they should have invaded earlier if they didn't want winter gear. But Napoleon moved slowly, German tanks still stormed 'Rus
@branza27 If you want to take over Russia (probably impossible) you cannot be fighting on other fronts.The best armies are the strongest AND the smartest, the German army (in Russia at least) was not. Yes the German army was stronger, and in most situations would win. But not in Russia. For the Germans to win they would have had to commit more to the fight, make better decisions and move faster. Yes the winter hurt the Germans, but by the time it did they had already lost.
@pheetay13 you are right,the more you advance in russian territory,the harder it gets to conquer. and the german soldiers were not ready for cold temperatures,they actually went to russia in summer wears . Germans were certainly not prepared to face ussr in their territory
@pheetay13 and @branza27 Also, the USSR defied Blitzkrieg strategies, to an extent, because Russia was geographically and logistically unsound; Blitz tactics were designed for Western Europe where roads and plains were maintained and well mapped. Russia on the other hand used inconsistent rail lines and most of the roads were not well maintained. Yes, the Blitz worked greatly during Barbarosa because of a core fact: the Soviets were unprepared. But, logistically it was hard to fight in
@pheetay13 I agree with your statement on the whole, however you're shorting the significance of winter in '41 - when the fall rains and winter snows stalled the German advances, the Soviet commanders consolidated their forces against the Germans who were as far as the Moscow suburbs. Also, the Far-East garrison was given time to reinforce the lines and this fresh force, combined with existing units, allowed the Soviets to counter-attack. Arguably, winter saved the USSR from defeat.
It allso is unfair because I have a Panzerjager 1 and I get put up against JadgPz IVs and all the heavy tanks and when I am in an M2 Mediem Tank I get put up against all the heavy tanks I might aswell just not bother.
Make the game more even because I have got an ok tank but I keep beeing put with lots of tanks that are beter than me and I get allmost no kills and I allways get killed in the first 5 minits.
It would be nice if Wargaming does more promotion of this game in the USA; I found this game by accident and while it has some flaws I love this game! They seem to only be interested in the Russian and EU markets.
This has been flagged as spam show
Free private hack >> AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free private hack >> AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free private hack >> AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 5 days ago
i want to be in a conversation to hey who went here because of the commercial
lilhuey317 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Poor matchmaking. EXCESSIVE DETRACKING.Too many non damaging (failed) shots (75% Tier 1-7 ) and Crits. Coded (RNG) for failure. Can't RELY on GUN or choose instances or kick poor players. Too many tanks on too small map. Excessive "stuck" in terrain. No combat log. No interactive minimap. Hi tier artillery overpowered. Scouting role suicide. You can buy XP & tier 8 tanks & skip lower levels. Post negative on forum they BAN you. Tier 8-10 play takes cash to break even. PLAY FREE...DON'T PAY.
jonnsmith180 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free World of Tanks hacks/bots only @ AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free World of Tanks hacks/bots only @ AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 1 month ago
Free World of Tanks hacks/bots only @ AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 1 month ago
this game is fucked up. the tanks are world war one tanks
joss7758 1 month ago
@joss7758 what the fuck are you talking about?... none of the tanks in World of Tanks war WW1 tanks they are all WW2 up to the 50's
F1zzzy90 1 month ago
@F1zzzy90 Renault FT-17 is French tier 1 tank. First produced in 1917 and used in WW1.
JohQx3 1 month ago
@JohQx3 so thats one WW1 tank... so? you can get past that tank very fast so it doesnt really matter
F1zzzy90 1 month ago
@F1zzzy90 Well that's true x) But statement ''none of the tanks in World of Tanks is WW1...'' isn't quite true :) Guess I was just being a nitpicker :P
JohQx3 1 month ago
Comment removed
zaquez79 2 weeks ago
bez premki nie pogracie. SZIT I TYLE
siwyyyyy16 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free World of Tanks hacks/bots only @ AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free World of Tanks hacks/bots only @ AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 1 month ago
got to get this game
MrWardog12 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Poor matchmaking. EXCESSIVE DETRACKING.Too many non damaging shots (75% Tier 1-7 ). Can't kick poor players. Excessive "stuck" in terrain. No combat log. Hi tier artillery overpowered. Scouting role suicide. You can buy XP and tier 8 tanks & skip lower levels. Forums censored. Post negative forum comments they will BAN you. Non interactive minimap. Tier 8-10 play takes cash to break even. PLAY FREE...DON'T SPEND MONEY.
greenarcher180 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free World of Tanks hacks/bots only @ AwsomeCheats. net (No spaces) Enjoy! :)
lmPete 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check Out my channel for World Of Tanks Live commentary gameplays!
DezGamez 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Poor matchmaking. Too many non damaging shots (75% nondamaging Tier 1-7 ). Can't kick poor players. Excessive "stuck" in terrain. No combat log. Artillery & Russian tanks overpowered. Scouting role is suicide. You can buy XP. You can buy tier 8 tanks & skip lower levels. Forums censored. Post negative forum comments they will BAN you. Non interactive minimap. Tier 8-10 play takes cash to break even. PLAY FREE...DON'T SPEND MONEY.
greenarcher180 5 months ago
How many times he said company?
jhonnleonardo 6 months ago
@Fudbot i doubt they will include japanese or italian tanks. Mostley because they wernt ever big players in terms of tank battles. I dont think the japanese even made heavy tanks in any significant numbers.
warhammer131 6 months ago
Why no British, French, Italian or Japanese tanks?
fudbot 6 months ago
@fudbot I heard they're going to be getting to those
AquaPhoenix2006 6 months ago
@fudbot french tanks are coming in the next update
ThePiachu90 6 months ago
@fudbot they were losers in ww2
qusaisaher 4 months ago in playlist More videos from WorldOfTanksCom
@qusaisaher and so were the germans
pheetay13 4 months ago
@pheetay13 in real germans who made them lose in first place ! and without help of god europe now should be some Germans settlement just like Palestine right now !
and USSR couldn't beat them ,but they had good luck that there was winter season which killed a lot from german army !
qusaisaher 4 months ago
@qusaisaher The USSR could and did defeat the Germany. Blitzkrieg didn't work in the cities and the Russian commanders were better at fighting block by block. The Russians also had way more men(after the battle of Kursk the Russians replaced their hundreds of thousands of casualties instantly while the Germans could not replace their experienced men) ,support from the US and Britain and were only fighting on one front. The Russian winter played only a small part in the defeat of Germany.
pheetay13 4 months ago 12
@pheetay13 Actually, the winter played a huge part. Thousands of men were killed and machinery seized up or got bogged down, or lost in snow drifts. Sometimes it went as low as -60 C, without winter kit that's Hell on Earth. Men froze to death sitting up.
jeebateeba56 3 months ago
@jeebateeba56 Its not really a fact, it's more of a matter of opinion on how much the winter affected the conflict. I see your point, and I probably should have said that it was not the only factor rather than just a small part. I simply was trying to explain to qusaisaher (who need to work on his grammar) that it was not god that allowed the Russians to defeat the Germans.
pheetay13 3 months ago
@pheetay13 if britain and america didnt get involved in WW2 the germans would have had a lot more soldiers to fight on the eastern front... the russians only won because of fater production and manpower
F1zzzy90 1 month ago
@F1zzzy90 I know that, but that's besides the point. US and Britain getting involved was inevitable anyway. I was simply saying that the Russian winter was not the sole cause of the Germans defeat in WW2.
pheetay13 1 month ago
@pheetay13 The Russians lost many, many more men than the Germans in WWII. While the Germans did get beaten back by the Soviets, the efficiency on a soldier by soldier basis was hugely in favor of the German army. The Soviet strategy basically consisted of throwing away as many men as it took to take a position.
bandjohn00 3 weeks ago
@bandjohn00 I know that and I agree with you. That wasn't the point of my comment.
The Russians did not have the training, equipment or artillery/armour/air support that the Germans had, but they had numbers and the ability to replenish then, and they used it to their advantage.
pheetay13 3 weeks ago
@pheetay13 Don't forget that Stalin was the commander, and if he had let his officers and generals to lead the army they would might not lost that many during WW2.
rune4help 3 weeks ago
@pheetay13 responing a three month comment... no but not really the winter 1942 stopped the german advance. they where alomst at moscva
chamagurka 2 weeks ago
@pheetay13 the winter actually played a major role, german tanks and soldiers not being adapted to those kinds of temperature. And there were a lot more downsides, but there was only germany vs ussr germany would ve won no doubt.
branza27 1 week ago
@rune4help @chamagurka Didn't want to type 3 replies. Firstly Stalin being the commander in chief is irrelevant, the Russians won anyway. Secondly getting to Moscow does not mean they would have won, Russia is big place. Napoleon got to Moscow. Did he win? The German advance was stopped by Stalingrad and Kursk, the Russians were the first army to stop the Blitzkrieg, and that was before the winter really set in.
pheetay13 1 week ago
@pheetay13 so when I talk about Russian logistics, I especially mean its railroads - all lines led to Moscow and none of the lines used the same track widths, so transferring lines was a bitch - that's why when Russia declared war in 1914, Germany attacked its ally, France (see Schlieffen Plan). Anyways, you also think taking Moscow meant jack shit - disagree: taking the capital city of the USSR in 1941 would have destroyed the Soviet organization. The nation would have collapsed politically.
KamikazeHunter1944 1 week ago
@KamikazeHunter1944 What I have been trying to basically say (my arguments have been kind of disjointed) is that Germany did not lose simply because of the winter ruining their invasion, but because they were not properly prepared for an invasion of Russia. I think that Germany's greatest mistake was invading Russia when they did. I still disagree about Moscow, using the Napoleon reference again, he believed that taking Moscow would cause the Russian government to collapse, but it did not.
pheetay13 1 week ago
@KamikazeHunter1944 But I do agree that I have minimized the importance of the Winter. I think that rather than causing the defeat of Germany, it sped it up. As you said, Blitzkrieg was ineffective in Russia, so the Germans should have adapted. While I understand your WW1 reference (btw Germany declared war not Russia), Russia in 1914 was centuries behind Russia in 1941 in terms of industrialization. Germany attacked France as they thought that could defeat France before Russia mobilized.
pheetay13 1 week ago
@pheetay13 No no sorry I misplaced my timing and point - WWI was to show the Schlieffen plan to show the poor militarization capabilities of Russia because of the infrastructure; That, combined with the purges, still applied in '41. That's the WWI reference. And you're completely right - Germany didn't prepare for Winter, but the timing for the fight was adequate - perhaps they should have invaded earlier if they didn't want winter gear. But Napoleon moved slowly, German tanks still stormed 'Rus
KamikazeHunter1944 1 week ago
@branza27 If you want to take over Russia (probably impossible) you cannot be fighting on other fronts.The best armies are the strongest AND the smartest, the German army (in Russia at least) was not. Yes the German army was stronger, and in most situations would win. But not in Russia. For the Germans to win they would have had to commit more to the fight, make better decisions and move faster. Yes the winter hurt the Germans, but by the time it did they had already lost.
pheetay13 1 week ago
@pheetay13 you are right,the more you advance in russian territory,the harder it gets to conquer. and the german soldiers were not ready for cold temperatures,they actually went to russia in summer wears . Germans were certainly not prepared to face ussr in their territory
branza27 1 week ago
@pheetay13 and @branza27 Also, the USSR defied Blitzkrieg strategies, to an extent, because Russia was geographically and logistically unsound; Blitz tactics were designed for Western Europe where roads and plains were maintained and well mapped. Russia on the other hand used inconsistent rail lines and most of the roads were not well maintained. Yes, the Blitz worked greatly during Barbarosa because of a core fact: the Soviets were unprepared. But, logistically it was hard to fight in
KamikazeHunter1944 1 week ago
@KamikazeHunter1944 stalin kind of let germany enter on their ground
branza27 1 week ago
@branza27 mhm, exactly right.
KamikazeHunter1944 1 week ago
@pheetay13 I agree with your statement on the whole, however you're shorting the significance of winter in '41 - when the fall rains and winter snows stalled the German advances, the Soviet commanders consolidated their forces against the Germans who were as far as the Moscow suburbs. Also, the Far-East garrison was given time to reinforce the lines and this fresh force, combined with existing units, allowed the Soviets to counter-attack. Arguably, winter saved the USSR from defeat.
KamikazeHunter1944 1 week ago
I love playing as arty my arty is the priest from the american side
paystobeawinner1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My channel for link and gameplay videos to an awesome multi-player tank game! No downloads required!
boltman318 7 months ago
Need to pay for this to play with like 1 friend?
kawakevin96 8 months ago
@kawakevin96 Next Patch, you don't have to. Pay to invite 2 people to your platoon, if you don't pay you can invite only one. :)
Symbiote963 8 months ago
It allso is unfair because I have a Panzerjager 1 and I get put up against JadgPz IVs and all the heavy tanks and when I am in an M2 Mediem Tank I get put up against all the heavy tanks I might aswell just not bother.
thebritishww2man 8 months ago
Make the game more even because I have got an ok tank but I keep beeing put with lots of tanks that are beter than me and I get allmost no kills and I allways get killed in the first 5 minits.
thebritishww2man 8 months ago
there are no american tank destroyers!!!!!!
gotingful 8 months ago
shit american tank destroyer loooks sexy
SparkMan527 9 months ago
how can i apply for a clan?
MTauza 9 months ago
Thats soooo stupid team tanks should be limited to nationalities. Tigers should fight t-34s and shermans not share a team! Unrealism!!! Fix it plz!
thunderbird810 10 months ago
@thunderbird810 indeed
warheartpit 9 months ago
@thunderbird810 World of Tanks, NOT World War II . . .
RebelCoil 8 months ago 5
How can i create clan or how to join there
bahardi1 10 months ago
For all this games' talk of realism, doesn't it seem rather ridiculous to have Nazi and Soviet tanks on the same side?
BaronVonKenny 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i like that dude's voice. no homo.
crotnik 10 months ago
Comment removed
crotnik 10 months ago
how do u form ur own clan?!?!?
TacoMan717 10 months ago
2:47 how'd they get that view with the SPG???
TacoMan717 10 months ago
@TacoMan717 Press shift.
ManTaZify 10 months ago
@WorldOfTanksCom are you still making more video for tutorial or no
ignasend 11 months ago
looks like fun might try it out soon, is it free?
desalator33 11 months ago
@desalator33 yea its free
flameace1209 10 months ago
WHOOO! PANZERKAMPFWAGEN IV! FOR THE WIN
JOmonkeyJO 11 months ago
I have a Mac!Can you make a Mac download?
megabotvideos 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Перспективний клан Evil Wolves принемае танки от 7лвл, только с отличним настроением, писать в личку!(Клан не участвует на Мировой карте)
skkz007 1 year ago
EVENLY we hot butt **** by is 7 and maus and a got damm t 30
RMUIR541 1 year ago
fix matchmaking!
SHADOWFREAK55 1 year ago
It would be nice if Wargaming does more promotion of this game in the USA; I found this game by accident and while it has some flaws I love this game! They seem to only be interested in the Russian and EU markets.
MrMasterControl 1 year ago
@MrMasterControl Maybe the usa just tries to boycot it, thinking it might be too soviet for them. =p
viviones 1 year ago
jojojo... nice!
dethron3r 1 year ago
No way that u.s. t95 super heavy it no in the beta yet . i so wanted too test her instead i have the t30 boo. Rest is just sweet.
starknight97 1 year ago
@starknight97 they are just playing as bots
so they can make a video of that t95 lol
warfare56 1 year ago
@warfare56 lol figures
starknight97 1 year ago
I almost had mah t-44 in beta. then i got grounded. I got the news of hardwipe via text.
I then initiated MEGA PISSED FACE
randomguy9898 1 year ago
I heard about infantry being included eventually. That true?
Pelican95 1 year ago
1:12 US.TD :))
tre1193 1 year ago
It's the T28_Super_Heavy_Tank (tack that on the end of wikipedia)
Catnipy 1 year ago
lol, get skype.
F1sTDaCuFFs 1 year ago
WOAH WOAH WOAH
1:12
..THE HELL IS THAT?
pkpgpk 1 year ago
@pkpgpk - Т95 US ninth level Tank Destroyer
OOLWprufKW 1 year ago
At 1:25 you forgot the likes of "FUCKIGN ARTY!!!" & "FUCK YOU ARTILLERY"
Tiny578 1 year ago
MAKE MORE URBAN MAPS!
DarkCybrid 1 year ago
1:12 I SAW WHAT YOU DID THERE!
Tichondrius1 1 year ago
@Tichondrius1 Overwhelming force of giant heavy weights
XD
ST3V3NK0M 1 year ago
conquest // jizz in mah pants
MOHrobbiebob 1 year ago
global map??? does it exist already? how do we join?
fadyb56 1 year ago
@fadyb56 Right now it only exists in the RU servers but it should be coming to the rest of us soon.
xCrimsonGear 1 year ago
@xCrimsonGear thanks for ur reply.
fadyb56 1 year ago
1:12 wow nice tank T28
gunnm747 1 year ago
Comment removed
gunnm747 1 year ago
America's TD! Can't wait!
darkleon 1 year ago
1:12 American TD , orgasm
It is so sad he have to play with bots :(
"eveny matched comapnies", I just cant stop laughing cuz of this . . .
RebelCoil 1 year ago 51
@RebelCoil ROFL also 1:06 "fast and agile scouts". more like "weak target practice" after the usual detrack shot/engine shot/both
xperjx 1 year ago 17
@RebelCoil Yup, "evenly matched companies" made me laught too, but at least they announced a patch for the Match Making System.
And yeah, that glimpse of the US Tank Destroyer was a reason to pause and have a moment in total awe.
HypnotoadProductions 1 year ago
@RebelCoil Bots?
AirborneRangerZz 1 year ago
@RebelCoil hahah : D
CaptainCangaroo 8 months ago
Do you want to see action from the game? youtube.com/watch?v=9lW7iapuewU
DrCzaraS 1 year ago
Very nice :)
Kalostaphor 1 year ago
1:13 new american TD ??
2424Lukasz 1 year ago
@2424Lukasz T28/95
TheCrazied 1 year ago
@2424Lukasz indeed.. T95 with 300mm hull armor :D or maybe the baby brother with less..
TheRiisingSun 1 year ago
how come battles are like NEVER fought like in this video..
Linnets 1 year ago
@Linnets
because it is a commercial video + ingame you have to adept your playstyle to the team´s, else you will rush and die alone.
k1dicarus 1 year ago
American TD @ 1:12
korsnas11 1 year ago
Clan Wars f*** yeah!!!
Akrablak 1 year ago
Guys, start talking about camouflage, I wanna see how you gonna make it :D.
dalkazar1 1 year ago 34