Added: 1 year ago
From: shawnfella
Views: 20,148
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (227)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @JustSomePerson888 - Who doesn't love Philip K. Dick? Perhaps Ursa Major/Minor and the great cosmic theatrical dance, hold the answers to your subliminal bears? There are so many archetypes being thrust down our throats, that subliminal bears and grey aliens get lost amongst the flotsam and jetsam. I'm fairly convinced that the only 'aliens' on this planet are called human. So in that sense, UFO's are alien.

  • Oii.

    

  • ;D

  • If you want to look for bears via matrixing, look at Adrian Belew's album covers. He's into bears. He was even in a band called The Bears!

    NOTE: I'm not stating that there's anything subliminal to be seen on his album covers. I'm sure that someone will find something though.

  • This is a bit too far fetched for me. I've been a Genesis fan for 30 years. I'll admit that I don't look at every album cover with a magnifying glass under visible, UV, and IR light, but you're talking about album covers done by different artists over a span of 15+ years.

    At best, I think this is a case of matrixing (look it up). You saw what you wanted to see on the other album covers once you "saw" a bear on one of them. Besides, bears were never a major theme in any Genesis song.

  • @DarkAmbient93 Try thinking outside of the box a little.

    "Bears were never a major theme in a Genesis song"????

    It's a tiny bit more complicated than that, man.

  • @shawnfella More complicated? Trust me. Genesis was too busy writing songs with cerebral lyrics and multiple time signatures to worry about anything subliminal. Peter has never cared about album titles. So, why would he care about album covers? Phil's more of a comic as opposed to theatrical like Peter. Sorry. I'm not "seeing" it. I know the personalities of the musicians better than most fans do. Whether literal or figurative, I don't think these guys had bears on their mind.

  • I meant to say literal or metaphorical.

  • @DarkAmbient93 I never said they did. And I never said that the band itself had anything to do with the Subliminal Bears on their artwork... or were even be aware of them. I'm not saying they don't/aren't, I'm saying that I never said that they did.

  • Steven Colbert has been trying to warn us for years!

  • but so many of these types of efforts share similar end games and denouements

    ~ powers out there beyond our grasp repent now and save your soul

    a) find jesus

    b) buy some of our new age products

    what is your end game here?

    inquiring minds want to know ...cut to the chase with less ambiguity and lucid sense of purpose lest people not be able to take things as seriously as you wish ( i suggest not so humbly)

  • @rdecredico I'm putting the finishing touches on a website (andYoutube videos) as we speak and hope to upload tomorrow. I'm not dragging anything out... I have a lot lot lot of stuff here and it has taken years to get it ready in some format. Why, you ask? What's my "endgame?"

    My endgame is I want people (you) to see this for themselves. I might make a film next year... but not until everyone knows what the film is to be about.

    Sub Bears = Tip of Iceberg

    Re: website... I'll post where, when.

  • @shawnfella nice !! ... i look forward to seeing more and going deeper down the rabbit hole... i even promise to bring my own carrots!

  • i also like and am intrigued by the shone reports items and feel that is really a worthy pursuit and seems like there is some real substantiation there in the film that kubrcik laid down some bread crumbs ...

    but again .. to what end? i have been part and party to so many hoaxes from all angles including pulling my own pranks in life that it is hard to tell at this stage anymore what people's agenda is until one gets all the way to oz and pulls back a few curtains for themselves

  • the power of negative space to 'create' an image is very strong and the more intelligent and active some parts of ones brain is the more likely it is they impose patterns on imagery that has wide radiant of colors and geometries.

    i have seen too many optical illusions that have been completely organic in life to jump to any conclusions with greater supportive evidence

    i am willing to play with some of these ideas further and juggle them mentally if the end up somehwere meaningful

  • cointelpro fusion steroidal gestalt

  • @rdecredico Also very well said, but I am not sure what you are referring to now.

    Are you implying that Subliminal Bears are a psy-op, or that I am a psy-op for revealing them?

    Why don't you just spit it out... do you, or do you not see the Sub Bears in the images (after my reliefs go away)?

    Are you a shoot-the-messenger kind of guy? Or a message-the-shooter kind of guy?

    Going to Montana soon... going to meet a mental gloss tycoon.

  • @shawnfella i posted in another thread/video that i see the bears ... some of them even before you have outlined them now that i am looking for them ...

    ... i also posted i am uncertain what it all means and do not portend to know ... i do know kubrick was into steganography and probably hid a lot of clues and codes in his works and i do know that artists also often just have subconscious imagery in a piece that even they are not aware of doing

    i am NOT making fun of anything ... (cont)

  • Respond to this video... (cont) i am questioning all of it on every level from this perspective:

    ~ i do not subscribe to mysytical superstitous spiritualistic faith based anything ...

    a) maybe the bears are really there and it means nothing

    b) maybe the bears are really there and it means something

    c) maybe the bears have not been really put there on purpose

    d) maybe the bears only exists from gestalt on our own part

    i am still undecided on which of these paths is truest...fair enough?

  • @rdecredico I've been working on this stuff for years and I have come to some conclusions.

    I think your statements B and D are the truest, with the caveat that the word "only" be removed from option D.

    Stanley Kubrick is the guy who, by using the Sub Bears in his work,"explains" the Sub Bears in everyone else's.

    It is a mixture of deliberate insertion and unconscious insertion.

  • @shawnfella But with Kubrick, it is all deliberate.

  • @shawnfella :Stanley Kubrick is the guy who, by using the Sub Bears in his work,"explains" the Sub Bears in everyone else's."

    I firmly believe this is highy likely and very possible

  • i wouldn't have seen it if i didn't believe it

  • @rdecredico As McCloud would say..."There you go."

    Very nicely stated, and true.

  • @shawnfella - You mean inter dimensional beings that inhabit our subconscious mind? They are really just your 'other self'. Your unconscious self. The one you don't know about. If you are finding bears everywhere, then your subconscious is trying to tell you something. Read some Jung.

  • @GazGuitarz I've read all of Jung. It's just another way of describing Archons and how they impinge.

  • @shawnfella - Sounds a lot like the Bible Code Effect. You can always find things that you are looking for using creative techniques. Why is the Eagle representative of the US and not the Bear? The only bears I know are in the Stock Market. What about the not so subliminal bears that exist throughout our lives? Teddy Bears for children, Paddington Bear, Zoo bears, in the wild bears etc.. are they part of this evil, alien mind sucking plot? Do the aliens look like bears?

  • @GazGuitarz I don`t think the Archons look like Bears. They don`t look like anything. They don`t have a material existence. When you look at Ursa Major (or Minor) it doesn`t look like a big (or little) Bear in the star field. It just looks like a bunch of stars. But cultures all around the world, isolated from and unknown to each other, independently see a Bear shape (which is NOT there) and call the constellation The Great Bear. Go figure.

  • @shawnfella - Isn't that what Jung meant by archetypes, no material existence, but capable of influencing your life? The similarity between cultural archetypes is one of the major factors behind Jung's theories.

  • @GazGuitarz - that doesn't really apply anymore - it used to, then cause folks like Jung identified it, the problem began to use what they described, it incorporated it into what it is doing - and one thing it is doing is it fakes synchronicities. it uses a 'valis' type means of injecting false things into reality, from 4d outside spacetime. like in the matrix. like is described greys can also do, in streibers books.

    they mess with spacetime.

  • @shawnfella - The bear archetype generally represents the Great Mother or Personal Mother. What is it that you are trying to tell us? Russia is about to take over the World?

  • @GazGuitarz No. I'm saying there are certain artists in a secret cabal who have an invisible touch that they put on their artwork. That "invisible touch" is in the form of Sub Bears. The Bears represent "that certain something" that is at the core of mass mind-control - they are the denizens of the subconscious. The subliminal "channel" is populated by alien beings: Archons. That is what the Sub Bears represent. Intelligent non-human entities are sucking through a straw attached to your mind.

  • this is psy-op crap intended to discredit the rest of the real, legitimate work being done to expose the patterns and the symbology and other hidden secrets embedded in films , secret society symbology , etc. All the kiddies are supposed to watch this and dismiss the entire genre of exposê videos revealing masonic symbology, mind control patterns etc. Utter garbage. The fact that so much work was put into this shows big a budget these demented agencies have to play with.

  • @OzKnosis Wow. That's great. I thought I was paranoid. Big budget? I'm sitting alone in my apartment with NO budget. Demented agencies? Dude, I'm a single guy working all by myself. Basically (and obviously), the Bear-Thing flew right over your head.

  • @OzKnosis - oz? 'are you watching closely?' - if not, then look up the Bowie scene in Fire Walk With Me, it might help.

    -oh we been to your meetings, some of us made the organisations you been meeting in-

  • @JustSomePerson888 I just watched the Bowie scene, I have no idea what it was about. We all live within a dream. This is more matrix style stuff?

  • @Pumpkingilmour - i can't find my comment on that here, so i presume it was at another of this fellows videos.

    intentionally or not it refers directly to the philadelipha experiment. it's why he plays tesla in that other film too.

  • I remember when I was drunk all alone and started staring at Genisis album covers for way too long..

  • @MBeLLzMedia That's a start actually. But try doing it when you are not drunk, and when your mind is convinced that the artists are in fact inserting this stuff into their work.

  • That's funny, all of these look like Tootsie Rolls to me!

  • And why would 'they' wish to bombard 'us' with subliminal images of bears? This is one of the most bizarre concepts I've witnessed, so I'd love to know the rational for the supposed subliminal bears.

  • @GazGuitarz Oh, that's coming, don't you worry about that. Anytime now you are going to hear and know all about the bears. This round one... I'm warming you up. Just you wait. A change is a-comin'

  • wonderfull !

  • 13:41 and 13:54 top-right poster: the Ozzy Ozbourne bear LOL

  • I don't see this one, personally...

  • @MediaPlusCulture Eyes wide shut?

    Like anything else, if your mind is telling you that it is not there, then you won't see it.

  • where is this music from? most disturbing

  • @ehbseedy First bit is Penderecki from the Shining, then bits from War of the Worlds, Planet of the Apes and Minority Report.

  • How can you show me that your not just drawing bears on this frames? I can't see otherwise...

  • @narson If you can't see the Bears inside of my "reliefs" then you are blind to Subliminal Bears. I haven't "drawn Bears on the frames." I have erased everything that I don't think is the Bear in question and left behind a Bear-outline around the detail that I think is deliberately arranged to be Bear-like. My outlines are merely finishing already-present Bear-Suggestions.

  • When i was a kid i had the same bear pillow as in the shinning. What does it mean?

  • @thekoobie Probably means your parents shopped out of the same catalog (or store line) as Kubrick's props/set design department. There's only one N in Shining.

  • You took Jay Weidner's expose on some other material and tied to expand, although I am confused. It is refreshing to know it will not be Aliens but Bears who will appear.

  • @bleaupearls

    If you look at Jay Weidner's article on The Shining, you will find my name (and work) stated (at the end) as his inspiration.

    It's not Jay's work that is being expanded on, but mine. That is probably why you are confused.

    The Sub Bears are not actually "Bears." They are symbolic of something else that the Bear Archetype perfectly encapsulates and illustrates.

  • Well, as Phil Collins said in a recent Rolling Stone interview he believes in orbs. Weird guy. Certainly misunderstood, with his Alamo obsession and all.

  • hey, hows things.are you working on more sub bears stuff? are ya gonna post some again? just wondering

  • @treefrog2108

    I hope to get it up this week.

  • where is pedo bear?

  • @webspaceinvader

    Don't worry, Pedo Bear will make his appearance... in due time.

  • I am impressed, but not for the reasons I should be...

  • @xraydelta99

    Veiled insults aside... I think maybe it sailed right over your head.

  • this is either terrifying or hilarious

    i cant tell which

  • @YerJob

    It's terrifyingly hilarious, or hilariously terrifying.

    Personally, I find the stuff scary as hell.

    It's the implications that are disturbing, not the Bear images.

  • some people have way too much time on their hands.

  • @watthufuk

    Funny you should say that because TIME is what this Bear thing is all about.

    Bingo.

  • There are so many obvious signs and symbols that are not so subliminal that are everywhere. This was obviously BS, and it's sad that it was even posted. Fortunately, not all of us are the fools that THEY make us out to bee! Bee as in "B", as in the letter on the Boston Bruins hockey jersey.... B, standing for Bee, err Bruin, which is a Bear! What the puck! There must be something to it, but just barely...and I mean bearly!

  • @yetiman030

    I take from your comments that you can't see Subliminal Bears, even when they are pointed out to you. And, very judgmental and condemning toward those that can see Subliminal Bears.

    That's all I have really learned from your post.

  • But why bears? And why subliminarly? Why? Why? Answer me. You found this, and you probably has got the answer. I never really came in contact with this stuff until you showed it up. What makes people even want to subliminarly put these things up, and what effect does it have on whoever comes in contact with it, of course, assuming that all of it is legit in the first place. I dunno your intentions on posting this, and that would be the of utmost importance on why it is here for all to see.

  • @flamevtx

    The reason Bears... and the reason it is delivered subliminally... is because the Bears are the Overlords of the subconscious. You have to consider the idea that some of the Bears are deliberate creations by an artist... and some of the Bears are created by artists who have no idea what they are doing.

    The Bears speak for themselves, unless there is someone else speaking for them. An artist is either building the matrix, or they are accessing the matrix. There IS a difference.

  • @shawnfella And what is the meaning of the subconscious bears? If they have any meaning at all? If they are a subconscious holding, then they must have this particular shape for some particular, and i assume, plainly explainable, reason. More importantly, in the works you showed, what are the implications of those bears being where they were put, mainly on the face of The Shining? I dont usually assume just anything as bullshit till i have dissecated it.

  • Bereishit - the first word of the Bible - BEAR SHIT - "in the Beginning."

    Holy Ursus Major and Minor!

  • @saintrupert

    I like it. I like it a lot.

  • OMG!

    Nursery Cryme has a song call "Harold the Barrel" - Harold the BEAR ALL.

    Naturally, it is about suicide!

  • @saintrupert "Last seen in a mouse brown over coat... suitably camouflaged..." Other Lines In Harold The Barrel To Do With Seeing Bears "Over the scene.." "More than we've ever seen." "Look at the window." "They called his mother to the sight" Nursery Cryme is a reference to child abuse. HTB is not about suicide. it's about sailing, depending on the way you look at it. It's about Harold's second vision... "if I were many miles from here." You have to ask, why is Harold on the window ledge.
  • Upon a second viewing, a lot of the images due in fact look intentional. Don't know about all of them, but a lot more than I originally believed.

  • @regardingme1

    That's just stupid dude.

    I'll mark you down as one of those people that becomes enraged when presented with the image of a Subliminal Bear. It frightens you.

  • I, for one, would like to welcome our new Bear Overlords.

  • @saintrupert

    That's the spirit.

  • this is retarted

  • @318cavscout19d

    When using the word "retarded" it is probably best to spell it correctly, for obvious reasons.

  • I saw Ditka in every image. Da Bears!

  • BEARS BEARS Everywhere!!!

  • Dude, Send me some of that stuff. I'll pay you whatever you want.

  • awesome video

  • @musiqueconcrete Jeesh I though you were writing in code fer a second. Monies? Oh okay movies.

  • @shawnfella So.. You're essentially the only person so far to have reached this conclusion with the bears and all that?

  • @Corothella

    Seems to be.

  • @shawnfella AC Clarke accidentally (?) reveals that Apollo 13 was a homage to his own discarded script ideas for 2001 . My idea- the Discovery ship is the caduceus of Mercury- Bowman, Poole are the Gemini ( half brothers, only one immortal) 3 hibernating men are the Apollo trio- black opps. Bisden notes that Kaminski means stone mason- the entire joke of the monolith as movie screen really is the breakthrough. Last departure of pod with Bowman is his third eye opening (or perhaps ours)-

  • @hozayamz

    If Kubrick had something to do with Apollo 11, then he almost certainly also was involved with the Apollo 13 movie of the week.

    Bowman means Archer, Arktos means Bear (in Greek). From Arktos we get all sorts of concepts The Ark, An Ark, an arc, an arch, the arctic..

    Of course, without me having to say it, you do know what I think the pod looks like.

  • Jay Weidner, Rob Ager, Joe Bisden, now Shawnfella- Kubrick's rare direct attack against "psychedelic fascism" is a key admission. The association with A C Clarke is interesting. I'll be honest- I'm an Apollo denier- the manned moon landings were a hoax- I think Stanley knew all about it- perhaps even participated. The image, the screen, has enveloped our lives. Even the strongest among us is lured into a disgusting hypnotic trance in it's presence. Let's respect a little discovery, here.

  • @hozayamz

    Think about what Apollo must have been then if it wasn't real.

    The greatest mass mind control gambit in the history of mankind.

    Of course Kubrick was in on it.

    Remember the producer's name in Wag the Dog? (The one that couldn't keep his mouth shut about the fake reality they were constructing).

    All roads lead to Stanley Kubrick.

    Think of Stanley Kubrick as the magician archetype in the Prestige. That's how he was viewed by TPTB.

    They know his films are "revealing the method."

  • @shawnfella So.. Where can I read more? What are your sources?

  • @Corothella

    I thought I made it clear what my sources are. Stanley Kubrick's films. I've subjected them to an intense decrypting process and have found the center of his maze.

  • @musiqueconcrete

    This means that The Shining is subtextually autobiographical with Jack Nicholson as Stanley. it is, in part about Stanley's years as one of THEM. And what happens when you break rank.

  • @musiqueconcrete

    Consider the titles of the triplet of films hinging on year 1980 ( bracketing it). Barry Lyndon; The Shining (1980); and Full Metal Jacket. It's code. It is s formula for mixing the subtext of these movies (and identifying it).

    Decrypted the code reads...

    Barry Lyndon means Beary Lying Done - I'm Finished Lying about the Bears.

    Full Metal Jacket means Full Me Tale: Jack it.

    These are the Parents of the middle concept, the child, the offspring of these concepts: The Shining

  • @musiqueconcrete

    Check this out..part of Kubrick's code

    He uses the concept of the parentheses (bracket), or its mirror meaning, the PARENT THESIS.

    He is as big on mirror meanings as he is on the Parent Thesis because the PT is a form of mirror meaning.

    You will have a concept surrounded by another concept and its mirror, acting as bracket points in the time line. Parentheses. The bracket position concepts act as parent objects to the bracketed concept's child identity (relatively).

    page break

  • I think you are over doing it man. Seriously, there no real boundaries to many of the bears you see and they could also be tons of other things. You are getting paranoid android. Sanitize yourself mate, good luck

  • @Marinkorpse

    The point is, in Sub Bear art, there is an inordinate number of possibilities for realizing a convincing to semi-convincing Bear if you DO simply put a Bear shape around this or that region. It is a process of elimination for the eye. it's like Bear glasses. I don't DO that. I erase around where what I think there is a deliberate Bear suggestion. Often there are boundaries and lines delineating a Bear however. My interpretation of the Spielberg Array is not entirely as you describe

  • @Marinkorpse

    Damn the 500 character limit

    To finish my point.

    Not everything contains Sub Bears. This proves the poit because of the other side of the stick. In Sub Bear art there is never just ONE Bear. It's a Matrix. Sometimes dozens There's never ONE Bear that's stupid and unconvincing. It's either nothing, or it's a Bear fantasia.

    And further, this Bear potential follows the artist or "house" as does the lack of it. And it also follows the subtext of the "piece," be what it is

    Now c'mon

  • @shawnfella

    Still not getting your point mate, I mean the bear matrix you point could be a mouse matrix and almost anything you want to make of those blurry boundaries. Plus, what's the symbology of the bear and what's the point to all of this you are supposedly showing. You say something about mind programming and secret services. It's all mumbo jumbo so far.

    It so out there even on this field that it looks more like a joke than anything else. Would you expand your explanation?

  • @Marinkorpse If you think the the Bear matrix I have gone to pains to point out for you, to make it easy for you to see, and to help you a bit before we get to the heavy stuff... if you think that "could be a mouse matrix" instead... then no, I don't think you do get my point.

  • k,you have to give alittle more than just random bears man.The bears in The shinning overt and subliminal were not related to what you believe they are,I assume.Just give one word what you think it relates too.I've seen \\The shinning many times,i believe I know most of the sublimnal narrative in it,thouhg not all. I am not aware of bears in other kubrick movies,can you give me examples? just a few words cause you seem to enjoy keeping secrets or youre just messing with people.

  • @treefrog2108

    The Bears relate to mind control. I mean extremely sophisticated mind control by an EXTREMELY sophisticated AGENCY.

    I not fucking with you. I have stacks and stacks of the most bizarre stuff you will ever see. And I don't mean just Sub Bears (though I have relieved about 25,000 of them from Kubrick's canon). Kubrick paints every one of his shots with Bears. And then he weaves it all together with numbers. It is almost alien in its structure, and I can't wait for you to see it.

  • @shawnfella Sorry for the confusion I created. I didn't mean to implicate you, treefrog2108, as being a vulagarian or a death wisher. I was just talking to the room and I guess I forgot that you can't really do that without it seeming also like I am talking to you, personally.

    treefrog is not a vulgarian or a deathwisher.

  • @shawnfella er well you sent a message to my youtube acount so thats why I took it as personally aimed at me. Thanks for the retraction,even though it was delivered in a smart as way.

    I have hidden a subiminal bear in my response.beware!

  • @treefrog2108

    Messages left here get automatically forwarded to related accounts. I didn't understand that this was the case.

    I'm not trying to be a "smart ass." Sorry about that. Typing abbreviated notes sometimes delivers "attitude" that is not entirely intentional.

  • @shawnfella Can you please send me some of this stuff?

  • @treefrog2108

    Also, try this. Instead of watching the movie "many times,"over a course of say, a year... watch it ONCE over the course of a year. Get what I am saying? Watch the thing one frame at a time and spend no less than an hour (or two if it gets exciting) analyzing each frame. The Shining is a piece of frickin unbelievable genius. It is a subliminal carnival that is not meant to be "seen" while watching the film. Every alignment of mise en scene, every MOMENT of the film... is genius.

  • @treefrog2108

    Interesting this thumbs-up-thumbs-down. As it stands at this reading only 35 percent of people (on Youtube) can see Subliminal Bears. Presuming of course that's what a thumbs up or down means. I find that fascinating. 35 percent. We can also make another observation. People who CAN'T see Sub Bears... are among the most mean-spirited among us. I note from the stats that much if not all of the input is coming from America. Wake Up America. It's gonna be bad if you don't wake up.

  • I have removed a lot of stuff from the comments. If its purely pointless, poorly stated hostility, it goes.

    Just saying. once you know they are sitting there, you can just see them sitting there. Fuck my stupid reliefs. I can't draw a Bear to save my life. Stanley is the Master Bear Guy though. His Bears are utterly visible, once you understand his technique. Once you accept that this is what is going on.

    Anyway,, I don't care how vulgar you are, just can the death wishes and all that stuff.

  • @shawnfella In that case, would you please send me some information? I'm still skeptical but I'm always eager to learn more.

  • @Corothella

    Skeptical is the smart course.

    Patience is also a virtue.

  • This is one big pedo bear joke right?

  • @shawnfella In saying this I'm sure you have done some research on the topic that I haven't. All I know is that bears are symbols of power and strength and that they are important to the Merovingian dynasty. But the again, so are bees and fish..

    Something I still don't get: why are you looking for bears 1) on album covers, ans 2) on the album covers of Genesis? What am I missing?

  • @Corothella

    The reason I am looking for Bears in album covers and movie posters is because I was instructed to by Stanley Kubrick. Everything Stanley does is in CODE. That is the reason he made movies. Kubrick's movies are, first and foremost, vehicles that contain encoded information. That is the entire reason for everything in a Kubrick movie. It's all about a very strange encoded message regarding a bizarre plot by the PTB.

    It is beyond science fiction. It's factual mythology.

  • @shawnfella

    So far all you have said it's mumbo jumbo. There is no way anybody can proof by their own research anything you have said so far. You are not providing any data just wild especulations.

    I don't see any reason to add anything more unless you provide any real evidence on your claims. To me you are either paranoid or a troll. In both circumstances my advice remains the same, sanitize yourself.

  • @Marinkorpse

    It takes a bit of time to prepare a 15 minute short out of a pile of occult spaghetti.

    As soon as I get back from Christmas, I'm going to post something special, then I have to get back to preparing my website.

    It's funny how I just gave you a strange little film that demonstrates over 300 subliminal images in a patterned array, with a bit of back story and promises that this is the tip of an iceberg. And I'm a troll. On my own channel. Great Ursa!

    Mumbo Jumbo? Please.

  • Vauge, tenuous or completely made up. This guy has done too much acid while listening to Genesis. He may have something with the first one but from then on it all gets a bit silly. You can't just make up bear outlines from nothing. Too much photoshop, too much acid too much bear bullshit.

  • The human psyche is built to decode facial expression so it is constantly looking for faces to decode. 3 dots can be perceived as a face (2 eyes and a mouth or nose) with this methodology you won't stop seeing faces that arn't there.

  • @1seer

    You sound desperate to not see, or to not be able to see, the incredible subliminal art of Edith Sedgewick and Paul Whitehead (and others). You're missing out. Funny how you think a person needs acid to see subliminal artwork (or to make it up in their hallucinating head, and then see it). All you really need are a pair of eyes and a clue. You could probably pull it off with just one eye (and a clue).

  • @shawnfella I do see a bear here and there but the majority of those you point out seem to me to have very little self referencing structure within the original artwork. For many, most of the bear face seems to be randomly created by you. This is not to say that you don't have a point. I'm sure bears are used by the controlling powers to represent all sorts, proberbly heavenly bodies. Some are more convincing than others and I do see some that you have missed or is it just coincidence.

  • @1seer There are plenty of Bears I didn't pull. I probably got about half of them. I'm glad you see some of the Bears I "missed." I was hoping for that very thing. That's why I left a lot of them out. It is much better for people to see the Bears without having to corrupt the virgin work with "reliefs."

    They are not DRAWING Bears. They are SUGGESTING Bears. They are providing Bear POTENTIALS. That's what subliminal art is all about. Your perception is a key factor in realizing a Sub Bear.

  • Every one is a tenuous stretch of credible association. This guy is creating vauge bear shapes and moving them arround until some kind of rough eye highlight fits the pre-draw silhouette. He is making up outlines that have no self reference within the original artwork. You can see a face in anything.

  • @1seer

    No I don't create vague Bear shapes and move them around.

    If it is so easy to pull anything out of anything, try it. Show me.

    Take any one of the posters (or albums) in question a show me a horse, or elephant, or human face.

    Now show me 5 or 6 in the same image.... Now take every other example of art put out by the artist and show me 5 or 6 horses or elephants or humans... consistently across the whole spectrum.

    Go on. Put your money wear your mouth is. Try it. Show me.

  • Im not gonna lie,some look like the poster had a bear outline in photshop drawn on it and the background lightened.not very convincing,others seem to be there,The reason I respond is,I have watched The shining many times,I know Stanley uses the bear symbol subliminaly overtly many times to tell a subliminal narrative. And you have mentioned danny and the shinning, So what do you think the bear means,they seem to be just random here.In the shining there was a link.a story, Random bears,?

  • @treefrog2108

    All subliminal Bears are about the same thing. Kubrick made several movies about it. The Shining. 2001. Eyes Wide Shut, Full Metal Jacket... all about the greater Bear narrative.

    Spielberg's Bears and the Genesis Bears are doing, and meaning, the same thing. And there are way more "sources" for Bears than those two. many, many more. Thousands of Bear sources.

    I have never once photoshopped in a Bear image. One does not have to. They are all over the place.

  • May I please ask and PLEASE get an answer.. what are the point of 'bears'?

  • @CupcakeXOblivion

    You would not believe me if I told you. So I have to show you. The answer to your question is not simple. I can't possibly describe it in 500 characters or less. Keep watching. You will get your answer. I have been working for years trying to figure out how to convey this. A ll while doing so the mystery itself deepened considerably.

    You see how hard it is for people to "accept" the Sub Bears?

    The POINT of the Sub Bears will be even harder to accept because it is just so weird

  • @shawnfella

    Would you please tell me what you believe to be the significance of the bears? I currently have a video on youtube analyzing Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut, and I didn't even scratch the surface of everything that I discovered. I will tell you that I know Kubrick includes the bear, yet I haven't figured out why. It's in The Shining, his screenplay to Napoleon, at the very end of Eyes Wide Shut, and also is an integral character in AI. I would please like to hear your input.

  • @davidlosers Those Bears you mention in Kubrick's works are "overt Bears." They are not subliminal. That is not to say that these movies do not contain subliminal Bears... they do.

    In fact Kubrick does it like no other. Kubrick has outdone all of them. The significance of the Bears, both overt and subliminal, is simply that they are what the movies are about. Kubrick is whistleblowing. He is explaining the Bears. That's why he is no longer here. I'm pretty sure A.C. Clarke filled him in.

  • @davidlosers I have a feeling this will be going into circles, or a cork screw dive into nothing.

  • @SlackerSlayer It's a Mobius strip maze into something.

  • @shawnfella Would you please answer the other users same question? What is the significance of the bear? I do not want to read later the same nonsense, "just wait and watch more", that was a direct question that does not deserve a diverted reply that can't even be called an answer.

  • @SlackerSlayer We are pretty demanding aren't we?

    It took me two years of 18 hour a day research (with NO breaks) to answer that question for myself.

    The answer is not something I can say in the comments section on Youtube. It is WAY too involved for that. I can't even say it in a youtube video. It is not possible. I will open a website early in January. I'm going to put everything on there. In the meantime, a few more Youtube videos to familiarize people with the terrain.

  • @shawnfella "We are pretty demanding aren't we? The answer is not something I can say in the comments section on Youtube. It is WAY too involved"

    THAT is a cop out. Demanding, why yes when YOU are making extraordinary claims it is YOU that should be backing them up. "Too involved"??? Try again.

    I mean how hard is it to come right out with it? Bear = money, bear = Russians, bear = ??? Say it or be known for a fake.

  • @SlackerSlayer

    Come on, what Kind of promptery is this? "Say it or be known to be fake." What, are you nuts?

    Just read, and watch, and if I might suggest for once, take a pill.

  • Could someone please clarify why the bear-pattern is so particularly interesting? I mean, I'm sure I could find a bunch of hidden horses or apples or something in there as well, if I knew that it would prove my point. But what is so mysterious and bad about bears?

  • @Corothella Are you REALLY sure of that? See how far you get pulling hidden horses out of graphics.

    I know from experience. It is not apples. And it is not horses. It's Bears.

    The Bear (as a symbol) is VERY, VERY important to the Illuminati.

    The reason it is so secret is because Bears are probably THE most important conceptual framework used by TPTB.

  • This grizzly conspiracy is so nefarious and far-reaching that I don't know if i will be able to bear it!

  • I can 'bear'ly cope with this 'grizzly' situation! This is clearly the work of some sinister 'cub'al with the intention of making us all bi'polar' slaves! There is definitely trouble 'bruin' here and I want to thank the subby for pointing out all of these 'kodiak' moments!

  • Look, not every detail of the bears are visible, that's why it's subliminal, folks. You might quibble on some of the "images", but not the whole idea. It's so incredible that it's over your heads. Once I woke up to chemtrails, I can't help but see the cloud-banks caused by the crap they are spraying on us, the progression from spewing jets to weather fronts. God help us all open our eyes. "Wake up, Danny, Wake up!" We were warned.

  • @hozayamz

    "Wake Up Danny, Wake up" From the Shining

    The nail has been struck on its proverbial head.

    Just hold your socks. When Kubrick weighs in on this Sub Bear thing... you are going to shit yourself.

  • bears a striking resemblance

  • yes, i do see bears and yes, some are easier to accept that i see them than others are...

    i totally know that subliminals are used in all forms of adverts and such but what is the meaning of this, these bears in hiding? what are they wanting to imprint on the minds of the masses?

    reading the posts, i can see that it may refer to pedophilia and/or fascism... but that doesn't feel right...

    i would really like to understand this...

    Maybe only because my name is QuietBear, i don't know...

  • dude I hate to ever agree with the skeptics but uh... wow. First of all please explain in the video WTF bears have to do with anything. In all the time I've been following theory I haven't ever heard anything about bears. Thats obviously a great starting point for the vid.

  • @432puremusic

    I have no idea what you are talking about.

  • It looks like your just masking any part of the artwork to make a bear shape. Alot of the bears you point out are a very hard stretch of the imagination. This is hardly proof.

  • @dropside

    I agree. Some bears are a stretch. But others are painfully clear. If you have established that Sub Bear imagery resides in the work... en mass, then ALMOST Bears, or VAGUE Bears are part of the subliminal landscape as well as clearer, more obvious Bears. Once you get what is going on, the Vague Bears are as legitimate as the clear ones. I can't "mask out" Bear shapes if there is nothing there to work with. Certain director's works are filled with Bears. Others, nothing.

  • I thought I told Jeff to stop posting links after smoking bowls of weed.

  • This is either poorly made trash buy some mercenary absurdists or a attempt at legitimacy buy a fool.

  • @Kitt0000

    OR... it is the tip of a Subliminal Bear iceberg.

    Try looking a little bit closer, a little bit deeper, and a little bit more carefully.

    If you don't want to see the Bears, then you won't see them. If you DO want to see the Bears... then just look... they are right there.

    Incidentally you spelled "by" wrong.

  • lol, this video must be a joke

  • @DaDawg4real

    Nope

  • ..as Forest Gump said "Stupid is as Stupid does"....and so does Genesis!

  • @FiteNoMore

    Yes, but he left behind some pretty serious stuff that nobody has seen, yet.

  • Bear in mind that the bears are hibernating now.

  • Just as the circus is banned from abusing bears, so should you be banned from abusing Genesis album cover art to protect us from ridiculous assertions. I mean c'mon! This must be disinfo to lead people astray from the real symbolic usage going on right under our noses.

  • @nokabob

    You are one of those people that needs to be protected from ridiculous assertion?

    I'm not "asserting" anything. I am SHOWING you something.

  • hahahah,. . .

  • holy shit, all i see is bears now.

  • this guy is an amazing artist!

    there is a condition where people see faces etc in wallpapetr and curtains etc...

    nice vid! 

  • @abstractduk

    Yes, but then can they take the wallpaper, cut out their hallucination with a razor, remove it, and show it to you?

  • @shawnfella would be interesting to see if they did-dont get me wrong-i like this-its high art for sure and i think you need to punt it to an exhibition space.