exactly! each and every hoaxer has outright denied this fact instead trying to bully their way into claming that the moon dust should get kicked up till far behind the rover.
even in 1/6 gravity, the fact that lunar surface is much like the nevada desert (½ feet of loose sand) would make the dust rise high up in a parabola and NOT thrown far behind. i doubt if the hoaxers could even begin to understand this.
they said that apollo 11 was nigh on running out of fuel when it landed...so how did they get all the extra fuel on board for the extra payload for this vehicle, with the same lander? see how the wheels kick up the dust?..so why did the LEM on landing not kick up the dust with the engine and cover the feet and legs of the LEM...strange
@krisdevalle DUDE your excuse that dust no matter where it is goes sideways and never "up" is pathetic thats the funniest thing I have read. OK taking your LOGIC the dust goes sideways from the LEM pad and lands on the other pad opposite...hows that grab you then? sideways in this case means 360 degrees yes? is that clear? seems to me that pro apollo people are hiding behind the so called facts and science and try to sound like geniuses.
@WELLBRAN I'm not saying you will have a science degree, but some review of wikipedia and the links provided on those pages may answer many of the questions you have. Or else review the NASA website.
Reading the list of Apollo missions and what they involved will cover many of the basic facts. You ask a lot of basic questions. To investigate this thoroughly, find out about all the missions, and then you can go from there. Watching random videos on youtube will get you mixed up.
@vincewansink "Funny how the rover doesn't flip when he turns."
Why would you expect it to? Your car doesn't flip when it turns, does it?
The LRV was designed for the Moon. With a top speed of around 10 km/h (though it reached 12 km/h at one point), and with a wide stance and low C.G., there's no reason to expect it to flip.
@vincewansink Yes dodgey physics....but look you and I are not experts as the others here, we only react to what we see and of course that is an absurd idea if you ask me, the NASA kids here will put us right I am sure
whoever thinks this is fake, take your car and drive it on a similar surface, earth's gravitational pull is much stronger and allows our wheels to be placed firmly on the ground... therefore, you can never reenact this lack of gravity, look how the rover bounces.
and also how the dust and dirt that gets thrown up by the rover wheels almost dose not move now on earth the dust would blow away but this just almost hangs there and slowly falls to the bottom
Well The one thing you MUST Realize is Yes we did go to the moon , but when we saw the things that were on the moon we had to Film scenes to Cover up what was actually on the moon. So yes some of the footage was taken on the moon ( like this one ) but some of the pics and videos are on A set. Also At around 2 or 3 seconds There is a UFO in the background. go to the 2 second mark and press PAUSE , then tap on the play button rapidly to see it in slow-mo.
Faked in a studio? Come on, think for one minute about how many people would be involved in creating the sets, filming, writing dialogue, technical advisors, special effects, directing, acting, putting it all together for distribution.......for 6 different missions....and in 40 years not one of them has come forward? Come on. Just a stupid supposition.
here's the nasa employee again he has been on these sites for YEARS as a nasa employee lying to make it look like there are still believers - most of them are fake accounts
thats right my friend -but worse -this is a perpetuated crime against humanity. i too am in australia but i have renamed it isralia which is a lot closer to the truth.
Anyone who says these landings were fake is a total loser/Fucktard. Look at the lunar soil. Its getting kicked up so much higher than it would on earth. They didn't have CGI back then.
LOL, moon landing conspiracy idiots will be here. Its strange to know, that it seems that theres a lot of youtube folks who think the moon landings are fake go on youtube every 3 minutes. Fucking Looser's obviously haven't had a girl.
I live next to the Mojave desert. If it was Mojave, he'd be kicking up quite a dust cloud. Instead, all the dust is falling in a perfect parabola back to the ground, like water. Vacuum. Put that in your moon hoax pipe and smoke it.
I didnt know that the moon had SAND!!!
Nostro200 3 months ago
@YaMumYaNanYaGran @daveinsd
exactly! each and every hoaxer has outright denied this fact instead trying to bully their way into claming that the moon dust should get kicked up till far behind the rover.
even in 1/6 gravity, the fact that lunar surface is much like the nevada desert (½ feet of loose sand) would make the dust rise high up in a parabola and NOT thrown far behind. i doubt if the hoaxers could even begin to understand this.
zambi007i 4 months ago
they said that apollo 11 was nigh on running out of fuel when it landed...so how did they get all the extra fuel on board for the extra payload for this vehicle, with the same lander? see how the wheels kick up the dust?..so why did the LEM on landing not kick up the dust with the engine and cover the feet and legs of the LEM...strange
WELLBRAN 6 months ago
@WELLBRAN DUDE. You need to stop watching youtube and spend a little time reading the basics of the moonlandings on wikipedia or somewhere.
The rover was carried on THREE missions. 15, 16 and 17. It even says this in the video title.
These were J-missions, with a redesign of the LEM for extra payload and fuel.
The reason dust did not cover the lander is because of the vacuum. Nothing for the dust to be suspended in. It goes away, not up. Is this clear?
krisdevalle 6 months ago
@krisdevalle DUDE your excuse that dust no matter where it is goes sideways and never "up" is pathetic thats the funniest thing I have read. OK taking your LOGIC the dust goes sideways from the LEM pad and lands on the other pad opposite...hows that grab you then? sideways in this case means 360 degrees yes? is that clear? seems to me that pro apollo people are hiding behind the so called facts and science and try to sound like geniuses.
WELLBRAN 6 months ago
@krisdevalle maybe I SHOULD go to Wikipaedia and get my batchelor of science degree today.
WELLBRAN 6 months ago
@WELLBRAN I'm not saying you will have a science degree, but some review of wikipedia and the links provided on those pages may answer many of the questions you have. Or else review the NASA website.
Reading the list of Apollo missions and what they involved will cover many of the basic facts. You ask a lot of basic questions. To investigate this thoroughly, find out about all the missions, and then you can go from there. Watching random videos on youtube will get you mixed up.
krisdevalle 6 months ago
Funny how the rover doesn't flip when he turns. I guess that 1/6th gravity is stronger than we thought.
vincewansink 7 months ago
@vincewansink "Funny how the rover doesn't flip when he turns."
Why would you expect it to? Your car doesn't flip when it turns, does it?
The LRV was designed for the Moon. With a top speed of around 10 km/h (though it reached 12 km/h at one point), and with a wide stance and low C.G., there's no reason to expect it to flip.
Or do you have calculations that say otherwise?
roamingcroat 7 months ago
@vincewansink Yes dodgey physics....but look you and I are not experts as the others here, we only react to what we see and of course that is an absurd idea if you ask me, the NASA kids here will put us right I am sure
WELLBRAN 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored2 1 year ago
not fake,it is apollo 16 and that is descartes highlands.
guitarnashelter 1 year ago 2
@YaMumYaNanYaGran hell yeah, they did land, peace bro
Deathkillazz 1 year ago
the rover is a bit bigger than the lander!
TheStjohnsman 1 year ago
How does the terrain go from darkened to lightened in only a few feet. A FLOOD LIGHT OF COURSE!
Ironoff 1 year ago
@Ironoff
Lookit the shadow dumbass it doesn't change as it gets brighter it's the camera light sensitivity changing stupit fuck
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo
Mickey Mouse Nasa and all AMERICANS ARE FUCKTARDS. YOUR FUCKED ASSHOLE. SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU RETARD YANK.
Ironoff 1 year ago
@Ironoff
Look at the shadow in the "spotlight" as you claim, it is going towards it. You are clearly retarded.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
Fake...
claridog 1 year ago
who filmed this?
GreenAlienPower 1 year ago
The second astronaut.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
i think the astronauts didn't have a camera to film, only to make fotos.
thats the reason, why I asked.
sry for my bad english
GreenAlienPower 1 year ago
They also had a 16mm film camera. This was not video, so everyone had to wait until they returned to Earth so the film could be developed.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
ahh okay thx
GreenAlienPower 1 year ago
whoever thinks this is fake, take your car and drive it on a similar surface, earth's gravitational pull is much stronger and allows our wheels to be placed firmly on the ground... therefore, you can never reenact this lack of gravity, look how the rover bounces.
wind3 2 years ago
and also how the dust and dirt that gets thrown up by the rover wheels almost dose not move now on earth the dust would blow away but this just almost hangs there and slowly falls to the bottom
Deadfox7777 2 years ago
ATTENTION you pack of nasa employees perpetuatin a crima aagainst humanity -die cunt
generalhercules 2 years ago
Well The one thing you MUST Realize is Yes we did go to the moon , but when we saw the things that were on the moon we had to Film scenes to Cover up what was actually on the moon. So yes some of the footage was taken on the moon ( like this one ) but some of the pics and videos are on A set. Also At around 2 or 3 seconds There is a UFO in the background. go to the 2 second mark and press PAUSE , then tap on the play button rapidly to see it in slow-mo.
AyahuascaGroup 2 years ago
man if they did land on the moon they must feel hell shit cause like cocks are saying they didnt...how annoying
Rwy02 2 years ago
Faked in a studio? Come on, think for one minute about how many people would be involved in creating the sets, filming, writing dialogue, technical advisors, special effects, directing, acting, putting it all together for distribution.......for 6 different missions....and in 40 years not one of them has come forward? Come on. Just a stupid supposition.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago 3
here's the nasa employee again he has been on these sites for YEARS as a nasa employee lying to make it look like there are still believers - most of them are fake accounts
generalhercules 2 years ago
I wonder if he crashed thew the studio wall
DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER
wen790 2 years ago
That is so bloody fake hahahahhahaha yeah right they landed on the Moon hahahaha
AustralianinfoWars 2 years ago
And you determined that it was "so bloody fake" how, exactly? Your extensive classes at "1/6 G Driving School"?
ImTheSecretSquare 2 years ago
thats right my friend -but worse -this is a perpetuated crime against humanity. i too am in australia but i have renamed it isralia which is a lot closer to the truth.
generalhercules 2 years ago
The Lunar Rover was built by Boeing so it was inevitable that the astronaut's nick name for it was "Chitty Chitty Boeing Boeing.
airdriver 2 years ago 2
there were only neil armstrong and aldrin buzz who stepped on the moon. dont try to be funny.
vishperl 2 years ago
@vishperl What are you talking about? There were 6 missions.
bartmillerbelgium 1 year ago
Without a doubt, you may call yourself a Badass of all badasses when you can say:
"Yeah I went to the moon... and drove around on it for a little while."
loucal7 2 years ago 2
Anyone who says these landings were fake is a total loser/Fucktard. Look at the lunar soil. Its getting kicked up so much higher than it would on earth. They didn't have CGI back then.
YaMumYaNanYaGran 2 years ago 22
People want to be alternative and believe otherwise just to go against the stream, just like all the goddamn emo's we see everywhere today...
Lastesina 2 years ago 2
@YaMumYaNanYaGran think before you speak. anyways we dont give a damn coz were not american tax payers.
elits25 1 year ago
no get a lightweight treaded vehicle. like a tank...
nakazatoGTR 3 years ago
they should take a jeep, specially equipped with its own air supply...that would make one hell of a commercial.
boosuff 3 years ago
Well don't you know Dave that its slowed down.
LOL, moon landing conspiracy idiots will be here. Its strange to know, that it seems that theres a lot of youtube folks who think the moon landings are fake go on youtube every 3 minutes. Fucking Looser's obviously haven't had a girl.
EndeavourLaunch 3 years ago
I live next to the Mojave desert. If it was Mojave, he'd be kicking up quite a dust cloud. Instead, all the dust is falling in a perfect parabola back to the ground, like water. Vacuum. Put that in your moon hoax pipe and smoke it.
daveinsd 3 years ago 10
@daveinsd
thats because it isnt DUST but yes SAND
Nostro200 3 months ago
oh oh oh oh i want 1 of that toy i want one one one gime one oh oh 1 1 1 i want 1 of that toy ill tell my mam to buy me one :D
olivaNEXT 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this area is familiar, its the mojavi desert.
thebestman200699 3 years ago
That would be fun
bronzepelican 4 years ago
Cool
blobrana 4 years ago