with the wave levels that low it wouldnt take much to render. the only thing that would kill it would be the reflection and the quality of the world. ---------- now i will have to agree that a p4 1.7ghz processor probably wont let you render crap. soo im not going to say fake. im going to say the person waited for the fps to go up by just looking at one spot the whole time then took a screen shot. id more likely believe it if it was a p4 2.8ghz or a 3.0.
this is fake sorry dudes i have AMD 4.4 GHZ 5000+ Dualcore 2GB Ram and ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro it can produce the graphics but very glitchy it struggles with the resolution 1024x 768 is max good game though!!!
I have the 2400pro in AGP running Cod4 on normal settings with aa off at 1024x768 at about 45fps on average. It only lags a little when you have just entered the level as it is still loading. So im quite sure that Farcry will run...np
sorry mate my above message was intended for crysis not sure how i ended up on far cry my 2400 PRO is on PCI 2.0 but your right though mate i have COD4(everything high but smoke),medal of honor airborne(all high) gears of war(all high but low resolution ),fear medium/high with low resolution for some very strange reason my card plays newer games better than older games but this card does have a resolution problem other 256mb cards can do resolutions like 1680 X 1050 it dont like prostreet either
COD4 is restricted to certain path crysis is a completly open island the 2400 pro gets a ass wooping on that game still not bad for £30 though crysis runs ok in low/medium
@nelizmastr actually my 5000+ wasn't over clocked it was stock and it was 2.6ghz per core it was a new HP Pavillion Slimline S3315uk machine and thought it was 2.2ghz per core i was mistaken i usually combine both core numbers to get effective processing power rating so 2.2 + 2.2 = 4.4ghz 2.6 + 2.6 = 5.2ghz and so on since my previous post ive upgraded to AMD Phenom X4 9950BE stock = 2.6ghz Quadcore and ATI HD 5770 1GB GDDR5 (custom built gaming pc)
COD4 is restricted to certain path crysis is a completly open island the 2400 pro gets a ass wooping on that game still not bad for £30 though crysis runs ok in low/medium
I thought it´s a video :( but the game is cool!
DeineKanal 1 year ago
with the wave levels that low it wouldnt take much to render. the only thing that would kill it would be the reflection and the quality of the world. ---------- now i will have to agree that a p4 1.7ghz processor probably wont let you render crap. soo im not going to say fake. im going to say the person waited for the fps to go up by just looking at one spot the whole time then took a screen shot. id more likely believe it if it was a p4 2.8ghz or a 3.0.
Turdman21 2 years ago
this is fake sorry dudes i have AMD 4.4 GHZ 5000+ Dualcore 2GB Ram and ATI Radeon HD 2400 Pro it can produce the graphics but very glitchy it struggles with the resolution 1024x 768 is max good game though!!!
morph9927 3 years ago
I have the 2400pro in AGP running Cod4 on normal settings with aa off at 1024x768 at about 45fps on average. It only lags a little when you have just entered the level as it is still loading. So im quite sure that Farcry will run...np
overclockerfx 3 years ago
sorry mate my above message was intended for crysis not sure how i ended up on far cry my 2400 PRO is on PCI 2.0 but your right though mate i have COD4(everything high but smoke),medal of honor airborne(all high) gears of war(all high but low resolution ),fear medium/high with low resolution for some very strange reason my card plays newer games better than older games but this card does have a resolution problem other 256mb cards can do resolutions like 1680 X 1050 it dont like prostreet either
morph9927 3 years ago
i have the mobile version of the hd 2400 and it can run cod4 in med-high with around 30-50ish fps
SharpShot2000 3 years ago
COD4 is restricted to certain path crysis is a completly open island the 2400 pro gets a ass wooping on that game still not bad for £30 though crysis runs ok in low/medium
morph9927 3 years ago
and your comment is fake too.
the 5000+ doesnt overclock further than 3Ghz without heat issues or the fact that you need to underclock the memory
nelizmastr 2 years ago
@nelizmastr actually my 5000+ wasn't over clocked it was stock and it was 2.6ghz per core it was a new HP Pavillion Slimline S3315uk machine and thought it was 2.2ghz per core i was mistaken i usually combine both core numbers to get effective processing power rating so 2.2 + 2.2 = 4.4ghz 2.6 + 2.6 = 5.2ghz and so on since my previous post ive upgraded to AMD Phenom X4 9950BE stock = 2.6ghz Quadcore and ATI HD 5770 1GB GDDR5 (custom built gaming pc)
morph9927 1 year ago
@morph9927 you need to update your profile picture ;) ATI doesnt exist anymore. its AMD now. (AMD Radeon)
nelizmastr 1 year ago
@nelizmastr actually your wrong ati have kept the same brand name, because amd own ati dosnt mean ati lose its name all cards still display ati logo
morph9927 1 year ago
@morph9927 they changed the name to AMD dude, since the HD6000 series was released last week.
nelizmastr 1 year ago
what laptop is that on
where can i get it and how much please tell me
helobanana 4 years ago
laptop?
jameshetfield93 4 years ago
COD4 is restricted to certain path crysis is a completly open island the 2400 pro gets a ass wooping on that game still not bad for £30 though crysis runs ok in low/medium
morph9927 3 years ago
the ati 2400 pro
Vandale2006 4 years ago
oh jeah its a great card but when i buy my new dell than i can´t use this card but its an AGP
jameshetfield93 4 years ago
how u like that g card
Vandale2006 4 years ago
g card ?
jameshetfield93 4 years ago
graphics card he means!
Guitarman187 4 years ago