Lord Ivan Canas: The methane time bomb. Please read the 'more info' section.

[flutch02]

@RasPesher

rofl rofl rofl rofl, la nina and il nino is directly attributed to solar activity and nothing else, as is everything else on earth not most of all energy but ever ounce of it comes from the cosmos not from within earth or the fuels we burn, the fuels we burn merely have stored energies, what did i say about solar and renewable? i am saying raw energy comes from outside our planet so for climatologists to ignore that it is the only real source of heat is fucking retarded

[flanksteak2]

Scaremongering. 

[EmperorofCartoons]

@flanksteak2 What did they say that was any less than a scientific fact?

[flanksteak2]

@EmperorofCartoons Everything

[videoloopproject]

we can use ballons to store all that gas and prevent from getting fire then we could use it in the future.

[MazeleyFanClub]

Our race is SO dead.

[freakoutguitarsolo1]

it's being released right now in the gulf of mexico, and ti's an inside job. wake up america,

[MartinHDJ]

LIES

[econdemocracy]

"Great piece, I will be reading up on this"

For more background read the great article by geologist John Atcheson below, just google: baltimore sun Methane Burps: Ticking Time Bomb

[prathapsv]

@erniewilson1 awesome mate, serves morons like him right !

[cruxan007]

mathane is 20 times more potent then co2,, we humans and cows are farting to much.. stop eating meat..

[sluterry]

@erniewilson1

wow are you a full on product of the american media or what! fuck off and die paedophile

[showaltermicro]

Im going to burn tires now, stop me

[sluterry]

Inconvenient truth = convenient LIE

many people will try to guilt you into supporting the poorly founded, far fetched, absurde theory of man made global warming, but just remember this, they have been studying this lie for 30 years and they are still no closer to proving it than the day they started, on the other side there is NEW evidence with every passing day that their theory doesnt come into fruition that they are wrong. i know what the truth is, can you accept the truth or are you guilty?

[MegaPepsimax]

@sluterry well i have a few things wrong with me e.g i have split personality and i have a short case of autism but i'm really smart

[MegaPepsimax]

we need to find a way to trap that methane and burn it into water and co2 as co2 does less harm to the environment

[sluterry]

@MegaPepsimax

you area brainwashed moron do you realise that?

[MegaPepsimax]

@sluterry nope, methane is true and we all know it

[sluterry]

@MegaPepsimax

you are fucked do you realise that, go read some real science texts read up on chemistry and physics PROPERLY then see how your stupid theories and beliefs hold. your a complete douche if you think we are doing anything to cause it and on top of that because we arent doing it there is nothing we could possibly do to stop it so STFU

[MegaPepsimax]

@sluterry oo someone needs to jump off a cliff- DON'T REPLY OR YOU WILL BE BANNED

[sluterry]

@MegaPepsimax

OOOOOOOOOOO im so scared of your threats, you know that threats are considered more severe than actions it shows intent and therefore pre-meditation, i think that maybe you sould be the one jumping off a cliff oh and just so you know you are like the millionth person that said they would get me banned simple fact is that you cant so you might aswell shut the fuck up. your wrong not my fault if you cant hack it.

[EmperorofCartoons]

@sluterry wtf are you talking about? Real science supports man made global warming. Only conservative pseudo scientific quackery doesn't. You might as well believe in e-universe or niberu or any of the other various loads of horse shit those types believe in.

[flanksteak2]

@EmperorofCartoons Probably not. What we know is that you waste a lot of electricity playing on Youtube on a computer made of metal and plastic etc and theirfore don't even believe in it yourself.

If you do then aren't doing anything about it which makes you an elitist hypocrite.

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

um where is it then? if european and australian and zew zealand and asian politicians cant actually give the factual reasons they believe in this newly emerged cult then what hope do you have? clearly youj are in over your head, heres a tip for life, "trying to prove BS requires a million times more skill than KNOWING it is BS and leaving it alone" i therefore need not to prove to you that it is bs, the onus is on you to do the opposite, seeing as people with more power......

[RasPesher]

@flutch02 You seem to be confusing politicians with scientists. The scientist is the one who has obtained the evidence for global warming; not the politician. The politicians job is to come up with a solution to the problem guided by the science.

When U say that something is BS you are making a positive claim. The onus is on U to prove your claim. Had instead U said that you were an ignorant fool that no idea whether global warming was true or not, then there is no claim & no onus.

[flutch02]

@RasPesher

im under no illusion, isn't it hilarious that retard climatologists are totally dumb founded when it comes to ill nino and la nina, and solar activity? i guess its cos like all credible scientists say, "climatology is no more founded than astrology" i mean to deny the very source of ALL energy on earth? how fucking dumb do you have to be?

[RasPesher]

@flutch02 Climate is about trends and averages. On average la nina is about 0.1 of a degree cooler than that of the trend for that same year. Every la nina year since 1980 obeys the formulae

TA = 0.013 Y

where TA - Temp Anomally and Y - number of years since 1980

In other words la nina years are experiencing global warming at the rate of 0.13 deg/decade.

Most energy comes from the Sun and no one is denying renewable energy.

I don't get your beef.

[flutch02]

and influence and resources cannot even create reasonable doubt that sceptics, who believe it is BS, wrong i doubt you will do it either, not to mention that the southern hemisphere is currently experiencing its coldest year on record, i see no reason to be wavered by your accusations of ranting and "conspiracy-ism", instead of comparing me to people with no proof of anything they believe in\ (people like you) prove to me beyond all doubt you're right, if you are it should be easy right?

[EmperorofCartoons]

@flutch02 Thing is, with conspiracy nuts like yourself, the proof is all around you, you just refuse to accept it. I could write a long, drawn out reply about the difference in weather (Its coldest year on record.) and climate, or about how gloabl warming will eventually lead to large scale global cooling, presuming of course the methane scenario doesn't occur, but all of that would be wasted on you because despite being based completely on fact, you would refuse to accept any of it.

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

rofl, no and lol, the behaviour we are seeing in the southern hemisphere is nothing more than the el nino / la nina effect that is a side effect of solar activity, it is all going along exactly how it is supposed to with no unusual behaviour, this year was planned out as colder than average based on the solar activity observed nearly 4 years ago, before that they knew that this would be a cool time, and before that they knew that the weather would stay warm...

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

till the beginning of last year as that was the end of the peak in the solar cycle, as this cold spell will end another upward trend will emerge and be individual and as unique as all the others, there is no abnormal weather, the fact that so called climate scientists cant even accept the existence of such weather patterns proves their lack of understanding of the solar system and that they ought to change careers,

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

you are the only one playing conspiracy games, you crap on about irrelevant subject matter as if it pertains to this then play the whole "oh but i would be wasting my breathe" angle, if your ideas and "proof" are so convincing they would be wastes on no one, but facts are that you are just as full of shit as al gore and play the role of nothing more than a corporate puppet to the laugh out loud scenario called politics these days, there is no conspiracy, its just a lie......

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

and are you going to tell me that after hundreds, neigh, thousands of years of politicians and leaders and big business (in this case the newly emerging GREEN industries who are less than 18% viable at their best compared to regular business energy wise) lying to us, that they have suddenly turned over a new leaf? isnt it odd that all these major green corporations and governments have no actual way of removing waste from the air but are still happy to tax and sell carbon...

[RasPesher]

@flutch02 Contrary to popular mythology the government is trying to reduce CO2 emissions without dislocating our current economy. The aim is to produce a market mechanism to achieve this aim. You are correct wrt concerns about future production of CO2. The question is, is the Government doing enough. Methane is starting to thaw. Plumes of 1km in diameter are bubbling up from under the Siberian sea shelf. CH4 is up to 70x more potent than CO2 as a GHG. We may already be TOO LATE.

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

...bonds that do absolutely nothing but further enslave people and the businesses and systems they use into debt?

and dont even get started on non US or EU or commonwelath countries, china pollutes more than the rest of the earth, followed by the USA and russia, Australia is the lowest emitter based on land mass, and even when in relation to population they still only contribute less than 0.8% of the global "man made" emissions, yet they pay a tax on carbon? what will this

[RasPesher]

@flutch02 According to the Galileo Movement, Australia produces 1.3% of World wide man made emissions, not 0.8% as you allege. The Galileo movement is a political organisation in Australia that wants the Government to repeal the Carbon Pricing legislation. I don't think that they are likely to exagerate our production. Our population is about 0.33% so we on a per capita basis produce 4 times the average. The current World average is too high, so we produce 4x TOO MUCH carbon dioxide.

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

... prove? NOTHING, the emission levels in china, the USA, Russia will continue to rise, not to mention that a single volcanic eruption totally removes all credibility of anyone arguing based on sulphur and methane based pollutants playing a part, also, the sheer volume of carbon emissions from the last 3 volcanic eruptions are more than enough to make all of our pollution irrelevant, but you already knew that right? its funny how you climate pusher fags always leave out....

[flutch02]

@EmperorofCartoons

the important facts, like the oceans contribution to emissions, the trees at night, the animals of the earth, natural fires, geothermal, rotting vegetation, THE SUN, the distance of the earth in relation to the SUN, the SOLAR FLARE activity, isnt it funny i have never seen a credible solar expert push AGW, amazing isnt it.

[MegaPepsimax]

@sluterry i'm laughing my head off, i'll just flag you instead and keep sending as much messages as you want asshole, they're not gonna harm me

[sluterry]

@MegaPepsimax

you really are braindead. that is all

[chessman21]

Google siberian methane. Its already started.

[Bidil6]

Methane has a half life of 7.66 years.

[MegaPepsimax]

wow really?that's short co2 can last 100years

[Zondagavond]

No it doesn't last for a hundred year, it has a half life of ± 25 years. So after a hundred years there will be just 1/16 left. Methane will be at 1/16 of it's original amount after just ± 30 years. (7.66 x 4)

[WolYou]

Most people realize nothing. Unless the water comes through their front door or a hurricane pulls away their houses, the most important thing for them is business as usual. And the damn climate change is distracting them from their daily amusements. They are currently in the stage of denial. There is no point in telling them something. They have rolled up their ears.

[scarletletterman84]

fkn mainstream media... I mean, they're correctly portraying the outlines of several different theories, kind of, but they portray everything at a bloody mid school level in a 60 second clip.

[nybotheveg]

if methane is alot worse than CO2 why dont we burn the methane as it comes up? that would create water and CO2

[MegaPepsimax]

your right burning methane does create CO2 and water but methane is being released in places where we can't trap it so it still goes into the atmosphere

[Zondagavond]

Omgosh, this video really made me laugh. What the makers of this video totally forget is the fact that methane has a half-life of 8 years. So if all the methanehydrate indeed will turn into methane. Then it will take at least 100 years or so. At the time all the methane is released, more than 90 percent has already turned into CO2. And as you might know the greenhouse effect of CO2 is 23 times less than of methane.

No worries about methane, it's just some more climatepropaganda.

[MegaPepsimax]

ok but methane is being released faster than it is being destroyed so the level is on a constant rise

[Zondagavond]

@ MegaPepsimax, it's not being faster released as it is being destroyed, like I said, it has a half-life of approx 8 years, no every methane that's being released will be gone for 50 percent after 8 years. When every year there's the same amount of methane released, there's a balance. When the amount of released methane per year rises every year, you might have a little problem. And I say a little problem because it's practically impossible to ruin the earth with a bit more greenhouse gasses.

[nybotheveg]

@Zondagavond yea but the problem is that the methane could push us so far past the tipping point that even though you removed the methane it still wouldnt be enough.

[Zondagavond]

There's no such thing as a tipping point, nature has always been in some kind of balance, there is no such thing as an endless string of positive feedback, positive feedback is always followed by negative feedback, it may just took a while.

[sluterry]

regulating the temperature not increasing it if it wasnt for ghg's then the earths temperature would rewact to every single gust of solar wind and react immensly to solar flares rather than the relatively smooth effects of these things we see here so dont feel guilty for driveing a V8 or owning a farm or racing motorsport cos your not actually doing anything that could in anyway increase the earths temperature and that is a FACT

[MegaPepsimax]

no your not, but it's heavy burning of fossil fuels that release the co2

[amberchrome]

I'd like to see the real figures behind this conclusion. Looks like so much panic-mongering to me.

[sluterry]

Incredible amounts of study spread over decades of solid research all over the globe from all corners infact have proven now that the earth doesnt heat more than its regular ambient temperature in the atmosphere it however has been proven that it is only the suns direct effects on the surface area of the globe that causes any heating seeing as this is the fact things like methane and co2 (Co2 btw isnt a large ghg nor is it a pollutant) will guard out more radiation than they let in hence.....

[tranquilocito]

There is one way to stop this scenario from progressing further: Going vegan! Because of the methane that comes from animal agriculture. That must be reduced quickly otherwise global warming will continue and the frozen methane hydrate from ocean floor and permafrost will be released. CO2 reduction is also important but takes longer time to show effect. So take action!

[ctvwr]

I don't think the methane from animal production is the issue. It's the massive amounts of carbon we release producing everything else. Plastics, electricity, steel, aluminum, manufacturing of all kinds etc. We can't adopt a dietary restriction for that, we have to consume less. And we won't, I'm afraid.

[sluterry]

your an idiot

[nybotheveg]

meat is the number #1 cause of greenhouse gasses. so eating less meat by going vegan or vegetarian would make a huge diffrence.

[MegaPepsimax]

idiot eating has nothing to do with this, it's the fact of burning fossil fuels, the amount of methane we fart out is too little to have an effect

[Zondagavond]

The number one cause is water vapour :P but they don't tell you that, because you can't blame people for water vapour

[zakaslamuk]

shut up you bible readers

[crewdogz]

If you want to know a bit more, "Climate Wars" by Gwynne Dyer (2008) is an interesting read. It contains many interviews with known and respected Scientists and Strategic Analysts. The prospect of methane release being a positive feedback mechanism for global warming is raised in the later chapters, but predicted to be some years away. This latest discovery by Dr Orjan Gustafsson shows how rapidly climate change is moving.

[TRUMPHENT]

I live in South Florida. My greatest concern, ahem, is storm surge. Take a few mm rise in sea level. Couple that to high tide at the time of landfall of a Cat 4 or 5 hurricane. The surge would be, shall we say, interesting?

[ivancanas63]

You are welcome

[savetheearthgirl]

OMG! Thankyou for putting this up we need to know these things!

[ivancanas63]

Thanks to all of you!

[SylviaAdGirl]

Great piece, I will be reading up on this...I need to know more, thanks for sharing this.

[Warlordbuus]

Nice vid... Scary but true,

[stopglobalwarming08]

yup like a snowball effect....one thing leading to another, etc..