Added: 4 years ago
From: CRoadwarrior
Views: 5,892
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (399)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its good but i agree the canned laughter ruins it

  • @Dierell138 Even the original probably had canned laughter. But regardless, many people have no problem with it. It's standard stuff, but the true genius of the parody is how the conspiracy claims were used within it while mirroring the original.

  • Funny, but the canned laughter really ruins it. It's funny on it's own.

  • @jordinyc Perhaps but many people like the "canned laughter"...and I do too.

  • Thanx for putting the truth out there. If your not a truther send me a add. I am going to make sure they don't get away with blatant lies nemore.

  • @Bcm80 No, I am not a "truther." They are far from truth on this issue.

  • @CRoadwarrior Agreed the truth is that "truthers" are liars. send me a add. I think like the truthers are doing we need to stick together as well.

  • @energyismass There is no "which one." Only those who claim it was some "inside job" are believing in fantasy pretending to be "truth," filled with distortion, lies, pseudo-science, bad logic and all manner of ad vericundiam error. But I guess you missed all that or don't even know what most of those are and what their logical implications are.

  • Yawn 

  • @energyismass And that's exactly how I feel about 911 conspiracy theory. Yawn.

  • There are so many things that don´t match in the oficial report... i supose next you will say to me that drinking water with fluoride is OK? Too late for you then

  • @zeropm1 And there are so many MORE things wrong with the conspiracy theories (plural) that I cannot accept such wild claims in good conscience.

  • lol  nice =p

  • Great!!! I LOVE that that you're not afraid to put the glaring, blantant truth out there! And the cherry on top is that you do it with HUMOR, citing one of the funniest comedy skits ever...I am so effin sick of this "inside job" crap. People will believe ANYTHING they hear or see on TV, and they act lioke they know everything. IF they would simply take a moment to do a TINY bit of research they would realize that its all nothing but PROPAGANDA. EDUCATE YOURSELVES! Before its too late! Well done!

  • Actually, when one does the research it is the government / NIST's official conspiracy theory that is as lucid and coherent as Oswald Bates. The irony is in the claim of intellectual superiority but ignoring the fact that physics was on vacation that day.

    Btw, it has been leaked and is official that the "9/11" commission was given strict guidelines as to what they can investigate and what they were forbidden to look into. I guess now the "believers" can go home now.

  • @biped19 Actually, when one does more thorough and credible research, one finds exactly as my video points out. That the vast majority of what 911 "truth" people argue is nonsense that sounds exactly like what Mr. Bates would say. I'm sure what has been "leaked" is of the same nature as all the 911 conspiracy claims: nonsense.

  • @CRoadwarrior

    Sorry, it is mainstream news, along with 6 of of the 10 9/11 commission members stating on record that t was a conspiracy.

    Other successful conspiracies you can educate yourself on:

    The Normandy invasion

    The Manhattan project

    Groom lake test facility

    Gulf of tonkin

    The holocaust

    The federal reserve

    I'm sorry to tell you this but your not in "control" as a citizen in a supposed representative democracy. The governments lies about everything.

  • @biped19 LOL. The next thing you'll be telling me is that the earth is really flat and that the moon landing was faked.

  • So awesome! Smacking down the troofers and bringing back memories of oswald bates at the same time :)

  • 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says I dont believe for a minute we got everything right, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only the first draft of history.

  • FYI, your hero and apologist for the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, Jason Meigs, compared 9/11 truthers with CREATONISTS (which would be you) and holocaust deniers. How does it feel to have the author of the book you gushed so much about on Amazon link you with 9/11 truth and holocaust denial?

  • Revelationz24. I am aware of Jason's ridiculous claim about creationists. However, that does not mean he is wrong about 911.

  • Ridicule/ad-hominem is not an argument. Your presentation of 9/11 truth is nothing but straw-man. It's ironic that one the groups this video is dedicated to is the "families," because half of the victims families believe that 9/11 was an inside job (according to the head of the largest 9/11 family group, Bill Doyle) Many family and friends of victims not only support the search for 9/11 truth, but they demand it.

  • Revelationz24. This was not intended to BE an argument, and it is not ad hominem. It is comedy and satire. Some people believe (still) that the earth is flat. So what? The issue is the facts. And the facts do not support any "inside job" claims.

  • The bottom line is that there is enough prima facie evidence to warrant a new and independent investigation into 9/11 (which is the main goal of 9/11 truth). Even if all but one of the pieces of evidence for the inside job part of the side were undebunked, it would still not prove that 9/11 was not an inside job because most inside job evidence is not dependant on the rest.

  • Nonsense. There is no credible evidence to support the "inside job" claim. Nothing but speculation, assumption, pseudo-scientific claims, and logical fallacy. ALL of the so-called "inside job" evidence has been debunked. If you don't know that, then you might want to check your ability to discern truth from error.

  • And no, my satire is no a "straw man." Please do not try using logic terminology if you don't fully grasp the meanings of the words.

  • Dr. Steven Jones, Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Dr. Robert T. Mote, Dr. Shyam Sunder these four doctors disagree with you also.

    Why do you feel only doctors opinions are valid, it is possible to be intelligent without being a doctor, and also to be a close minded asshole with a doctorate...is it not?

  • Steven Jones is not a civil engineer. Dr. Abolhassan has NOT written anything in favor of conspiracy theories, Dr. Shyam Sunder is NOT a conspiracy theorist, and Mote is a Canadian structural engineer who appears to have done no direct research on US designs or Tower construction. I never said only doctors opinions are valid. However, would YOU trust your health to a medical person who only got a Bachelors degree in a field unrelated to medicine?

  • Where do you get your info from?

    "Dr. Steven Jones is a doctor of engineering"

    and this is FACT. You are a fool, I would consider alternative medicine, my gp says to cut off my gangrenous foot, while another non-doctor, states try ozone therapy and keep your foot. We as a people do not have it all figured out, not long ago consensus was the world was flat. You are such a douche bag, do you live in Victoria BC?

  • NOmeans. I got my information from the BYU website where he used to work. The question is, where do YOU get your information from. Jones is NOT a CIVIL engineer. His specialty is cold fusion or (Muon-catalyzed fusion, metal-catalyzed fusion, archaeometry, solar energy). Look it up. He is a doctor of physics, NOT civil (building) engineering. You really should get your facts straight.

  • Ph.D. in physics from Vanderbilt University

    ...but what does he know!

    You will keep altering your criteria until you get the desired response. Jones, Gage et al have a greater understanding of physics, engineering and spelling, than you.

    Take a look at the comments here, you are in the minority, and the consensus is that YOU are the fool.

  • Regardless, the fact remains Jones is no expert on how buildings work. Jones and company do not have a greater understanding of civil engineering than Thomas Eagar, Zdenek Bazant, and LESLIE ROBERTSON, the main engineer for the Towers.  Consensus gentium fallacy does not prove anything. I've done my homework and know the truth. You might want to try it sometime (doing real homework).

  • Looks like you owned all these conspiracy theorists nicely Warrior. Not even our friend and extreme Bush hater Bill Maher subscribes to that conspiracy theory nonsense. You can actually hear explosions from a controlled demolition, but NOT ONE explosion was heard when those towers fell when you listen to the audio footage, and THOUSANDS of eyewitnesses who were actually there have attested to this fact. I guess in the eyes of conspirators, the witnesses were all wrong. LOL. Unbelievable. ;-)

  • No doctorate level engineers question 9/11?

    Dr. Steven Jones is a doctor of engineering, and a questioner of the "official" story. If he doesn't ever respond to you it may not be because he is fake, it could be because he sees conversing with you a waste of his time.

  • Steven Jones is NOT a civil engineer. Even his own civil engineering department at BYU disowned him and his conspiracy views. You simply have no case.

  • Great video. You have real talent!

  • LOL. You're a joke. Go get some edumacation.

  • Your rectorial observatoration of such a matter is nocturnalized. Your flabottomy is accurate.

  • LOL. You've been taking classes at the Oswald Bates school.

  • Your pragmatic fallatio is correct, LOL

  • I can understand the motive for such a video, but if you are claiming the Warren Com..., oops I mean 9/11 Commission, is accurate you deserve the 1* I gave you.

  • NOmeans...I only claim that 9/11 wild conspiracy theories do not hold up to thoughtful scrutiny.

  • but lumping ALL together could generate some problems. Don't you agree? The mocking of these concerned citizens, as humorous as it may be, could be seen as bigoted or close minded. We can not deny the irregularities on that fateful day. As is said in any murder case; "Follow the money."

  • NOmeans. No, I do not agree. When people don't pay attention to credible facts and ignore credible witnesses and experts for "irregularities," insanity is not far behind. You can "follow the money" all day, but people don't always do things for "money."

  • credible? like thermate? or architects? The 911 commission is a joke and there is more than enough credible evidence to open a REAL investigation.

    But then again if one is apt to follow fairy stories, one may not care for the truth!

  • Yes, credible. What about thermate? Anyone can make ignorant claims about something. Architects? What about the fact that not ONE doctorate level civil engineer has written in support of 911 conspiracy theories? Not ONE! Explain that one. The real fairy stories are made up by ignorant folks who like to pretend to be experts in areas they've never studied.

  • and look how being force fed other dogma has made you a blind fool. You do know of Richard Gage and the architects for 9/11 truth, 1000's of highly trained, (I suspect more than you) people who KNOW we are fed lies!

  • NomeanssnoFAN. I am far from a "blind fool." The shoe is clearly on the other foot. I know of Gage. I also know that he's not credible and is not a doctor in civil engineering. And I also know that just because people are on some list on a conspiracy website, that this does NOT mean much. I've tried to contact some of the people on those lists with no answer. Interesting.

  • If you believe the "truth" from the 911 commission then you are more gullible than you appear from your comments. Gage and his group, engineers and architects for 911 truth are FAR more educated than you on this subject. Why is it that religious people are the first to fall in line with propaganda? Is it because they have been trained to accept blatant lies as truth already?

    If you do not question the events on that day you have your head buried firmly in the sand or in a darker, smellier place!

  • Religious people are the first to fall in line with propaganda? LOL. Now that is a joke. I find the first to fall for conspiracy propaganda are the uneducated who already believe silly things like we never landed on the moon or Big Foot exists. As I have said, I've done the proper homework, checked references, and I know the truth. All you know is the propaganda you've been fed.

  • lopytube. Take that drivel somewhere else. I've studied this and debated it beyond what you could imagine. I've contacted eyewitnesses and experts, and I know the truth. So while you're blocked for violating my clearly posted rules, you might want to do a more thorough job of investigating the issue.

  • It's an amusing little fact that most of the people who think the government was being entirely honest about 9/11 are also more likely to believe the earth is 6000 years old and that the flintstones is a documentary.

  • 33A4C...It is even more amusing fact that people like yourself who tend to think that 911 was some kind of "inside job" are also most likely to ASSUME the beliefs of others without getting their facts in order. The Bible neither gives us the "age" of the earth (6,000 years or otherwise) nor do I subscribe to such ages.

  • oldsk00Ldaz...Bollocks? I don't think so.

  • Oswald iz off the wall..literally

  • Excellent!!

  • What a great video!! 5*s all the way. Thank you for exposing these idiotic conspiracy theorist for what they are, and for that matter what they sound like.

  • allow me to permeate the specificity, excuse me, the banality of your wack video. leave the jokes to the pros.

  • Ok Mr. 1 channel view since 2007...Whatever you say. LOL.

  • Deadmessenger81...perhaps you need a resurrection. All of your questions have been answered already. Check the link to the right. There is no excuse for your ignorance.

  • NIST just completely revised their explanation for building 7. You might want to revise whatever retarded explanation you have on your crappy geocities page as well.

  • sstearns34...What you don't get is that no matter what NIST says, they don't support wild con spiracy theories about building 7. And if you had bothered to READ the "crappy" web page, you would have known that I never even addressed building 7. LOL.

  • Which is ironic because just above this comment, you direct another person to your website to answer his questions about building 7.

  • Yet, this didn't stop you from directing deadmessenger81 to your website for an explanation as to how building 7 came down.

  • That, sstearns34, is because I have several other links on my website that address the building 7 issue.

  • I was going to help defend you but you appear to have it all under control. Good gob.

    You may want to reference a video I got where the Loose Change guys basicaly admit they were very young and took libertys with the truth. search: Hardfire Loose Change Discussion

  • Thanks, dynamitemike65. I will have to look up the Hardfire Loose Change Discussion, even though I knew from the start that these guys were playing fast and loose with the facts.

  • good video dude!

  • Thanks...I enjoyed doing it dude!

  • Goodness, if I didn't know this was a parody I'd be hard-pressed not to consider you a Truther.

    Well done.

  • Thanks, Clunkity...I thought I was clear in my "more info" section to the right where I stand. I was making fun of their claims...because they are FUNNY. LOL

  • Your information in the description box was sufficient in telling the difference between a Truther and what you believe, but man you nailed it in the video for sure.

  • LOL...it still cracks me up.

  • its good but i agree the canned laughter ruins it

  • @Dierell138 Even the original probably had canned laughter. But regardless, many people have no problem with it. It's standard stuff, but the true genius of the parody is how the conspiracy claims were used within it while mirroring the original.

  • Funny, but the canned laughter really ruins it. It's funny on it's own.

  • @jordinyc Perhaps but many people like the "canned laughter"...and I do too.

  • Thanx for putting the truth out there. If your not a truther send me a add. I am going to make sure they don't get away with blatant lies nemore.

  • @Bcm80 No, I am not a "truther." They are far from truth on this issue.

  • @CRoadwarrior Agreed the truth is that "truthers" are liars. send me a add. I think like the truthers are doing we need to stick together as well.

  • @energyismass There is no "which one." Only those who claim it was some "inside job" are believing in fantasy pretending to be "truth," filled with distortion, lies, pseudo-science, bad logic and all manner of ad vericundiam error. But I guess you missed all that or don't even know what most of those are and what their logical implications are.

  • Yawn 

  • @energyismass And that's exactly how I feel about 911 conspiracy theory. Yawn.

  • There are so many things that don´t match in the oficial report... i supose next you will say to me that drinking water with fluoride is OK? Too late for you then

  • @zeropm1 And there are so many MORE things wrong with the conspiracy theories (plural) that I cannot accept such wild claims in good conscience.

  • lol nice =p

  • Great!!! I LOVE that that you're not afraid to put the glaring, blantant truth out there! And the cherry on top is that you do it with HUMOR, citing one of the funniest comedy skits ever...I am so effin sick of this "inside job" crap. People will believe ANYTHING they hear or see on TV, and they act lioke they know everything. IF they would simply take a moment to do a TINY bit of research they would realize that its all nothing but PROPAGANDA. EDUCATE YOURSELVES! Before its too late! Well done!

  • Actually, when one does the research it is the government / NIST's official conspiracy theory that is as lucid and coherent as Oswald Bates. The irony is in the claim of intellectual superiority but ignoring the fact that physics was on vacation that day.

    Btw, it has been leaked and is official that the "9/11" commission was given strict guidelines as to what they can investigate and what they were forbidden to look into. I guess now the "believers" can go home now.

  • @biped19 Actually, when one does more thorough and credible research, one finds exactly as my video points out. That the vast majority of what 911 "truth" people argue is nonsense that sounds exactly like what Mr. Bates would say. I'm sure what has been "leaked" is of the same nature as all the 911 conspiracy claims: nonsense.

  • @CRoadwarrior

    Sorry, it is mainstream news, along with 6 of of the 10 9/11 commission members stating on record that t was a conspiracy.

    Other successful conspiracies you can educate yourself on:

    The Normandy invasion

    The Manhattan project

    Groom lake test facility

    Gulf of tonkin

    The holocaust

    The federal reserve

    I'm sorry to tell you this but your not in "control" as a citizen in a supposed representative democracy. The governments lies about everything.

  • @biped19 LOL. The next thing you'll be telling me is that the earth is really flat and that the moon landing was faked.

  • So awesome! Smacking down the troofers and bringing back memories of oswald bates at the same time :)

  • 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says I dont believe for a minute we got everything right, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only the first draft of history.

  • FYI, your hero and apologist for the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, Jason Meigs, compared 9/11 truthers with CREATONISTS (which would be you) and holocaust deniers. How does it feel to have the author of the book you gushed so much about on Amazon link you with 9/11 truth and holocaust denial?

  • Revelationz24. I am aware of Jason's ridiculous claim about creationists. However, that does not mean he is wrong about 911.

  • Ridicule/ad-hominem is not an argument. Your presentation of 9/11 truth is nothing but straw-man. It's ironic that one the groups this video is dedicated to is the "families," because half of the victims families believe that 9/11 was an inside job (according to the head of the largest 9/11 family group, Bill Doyle) Many family and friends of victims not only support the search for 9/11 truth, but they demand it.

  • Revelationz24. This was not intended to BE an argument, and it is not ad hominem. It is comedy and satire. Some people believe (still) that the earth is flat. So what? The issue is the facts. And the facts do not support any "inside job" claims.

  • The bottom line is that there is enough prima facie evidence to warrant a new and independent investigation into 9/11 (which is the main goal of 9/11 truth). Even if all but one of the pieces of evidence for the inside job part of the side were undebunked, it would still not prove that 9/11 was not an inside job because most inside job evidence is not dependant on the rest.

  • Nonsense. There is no credible evidence to support the "inside job" claim. Nothing but speculation, assumption, pseudo-scientific claims, and logical fallacy. ALL of the so-called "inside job" evidence has been debunked. If you don't know that, then you might want to check your ability to discern truth from error.

  • And no, my satire is no a "straw man." Please do not try using logic terminology if you don't fully grasp the meanings of the words.

  • Dr. Steven Jones, Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Dr. Robert T. Mote, Dr. Shyam Sunder these four doctors disagree with you also.

    Why do you feel only doctors opinions are valid, it is possible to be intelligent without being a doctor, and also to be a close minded asshole with a doctorate...is it not?

  • Steven Jones is not a civil engineer. Dr. Abolhassan has NOT written anything in favor of conspiracy theories, Dr. Shyam Sunder is NOT a conspiracy theorist, and Mote is a Canadian structural engineer who appears to have done no direct research on US designs or Tower construction. I never said only doctors opinions are valid. However, would YOU trust your health to a medical person who only got a Bachelors degree in a field unrelated to medicine?

  • Where do you get your info from?

    "Dr. Steven Jones is a doctor of engineering"

    and this is FACT. You are a fool, I would consider alternative medicine, my gp says to cut off my gangrenous foot, while another non-doctor, states try ozone therapy and keep your foot. We as a people do not have it all figured out, not long ago consensus was the world was flat. You are such a douche bag, do you live in Victoria BC?

  • NOmeans. I got my information from the BYU website where he used to work. The question is, where do YOU get your information from. Jones is NOT a CIVIL engineer. His specialty is cold fusion or (Muon-catalyzed fusion, metal-catalyzed fusion, archaeometry, solar energy). Look it up. He is a doctor of physics, NOT civil (building) engineering. You really should get your facts straight.

  • Ph.D. in physics from Vanderbilt University

    ...but what does he know!

    You will keep altering your criteria until you get the desired response. Jones, Gage et al have a greater understanding of physics, engineering and spelling, than you.

    Take a look at the comments here, you are in the minority, and the consensus is that YOU are the fool.

  • Regardless, the fact remains Jones is no expert on how buildings work. Jones and company do not have a greater understanding of civil engineering than Thomas Eagar, Zdenek Bazant, and LESLIE ROBERTSON, the main engineer for the Towers. Consensus gentium fallacy does not prove anything. I've done my homework and know the truth. You might want to try it sometime (doing real homework).

  • Looks like you owned all these conspiracy theorists nicely Warrior. Not even our friend and extreme Bush hater Bill Maher subscribes to that conspiracy theory nonsense. You can actually hear explosions from a controlled demolition, but NOT ONE explosion was heard when those towers fell when you listen to the audio footage, and THOUSANDS of eyewitnesses who were actually there have attested to this fact. I guess in the eyes of conspirators, the witnesses were all wrong. LOL. Unbelievable. ;-)

  • No doctorate level engineers question 9/11?

    Dr. Steven Jones is a doctor of engineering, and a questioner of the "official" story. If he doesn't ever respond to you it may not be because he is fake, it could be because he sees conversing with you a waste of his time.

  • Steven Jones is NOT a civil engineer. Even his own civil engineering department at BYU disowned him and his conspiracy views. You simply have no case.

  • Great video. You have real talent!

  • LOL. You're a joke.  Go get some edumacation.

  • Your rectorial observatoration of such a matter is nocturnalized. Your flabottomy is accurate.

  • LOL. You've been taking classes at the Oswald Bates school.

  • Your pragmatic fallatio is correct, LOL

  • I can understand the motive for such a video, but if you are claiming the Warren Com..., oops I mean 9/11 Commission, is accurate you deserve the 1* I gave you.

  • NOmeans...I only claim that 9/11 wild conspiracy theories do not hold up to thoughtful scrutiny.

  • but lumping ALL together could generate some problems. Don't you agree? The mocking of these concerned citizens, as humorous as it may be, could be seen as bigoted or close minded. We can not deny the irregularities on that fateful day. As is said in any murder case; "Follow the money."

  • NOmeans. No, I do not agree. When people don't pay attention to credible facts and ignore credible witnesses and experts for "irregularities," insanity is not far behind. You can "follow the money" all day, but people don't always do things for "money."

  • credible? like thermate? or architects? The 911 commission is a joke and there is more than enough credible evidence to open a REAL investigation.

    But then again if one is apt to follow fairy stories, one may not care for the truth!

  • Yes, credible. What about thermate? Anyone can make ignorant claims about something. Architects? What about the fact that not ONE doctorate level civil engineer has written in support of 911 conspiracy theories? Not ONE! Explain that one. The real fairy stories are made up by ignorant folks who like to pretend to be experts in areas they've never studied.

  • and look how being force fed other dogma has made you a blind fool. You do know of Richard Gage and the architects for 9/11 truth, 1000's of highly trained, (I suspect more than you) people who KNOW we are fed lies!

  • NomeanssnoFAN. I am far from a "blind fool." The shoe is clearly on the other foot. I know of Gage. I also know that he's not credible and is not a doctor in civil engineering. And I also know that just because people are on some list on a conspiracy website, that this does NOT mean much. I've tried to contact some of the people on those lists with no answer. Interesting.

  • If you believe the "truth" from the 911 commission then you are more gullible than you appear from your comments. Gage and his group, engineers and architects for 911 truth are FAR more educated than you on this subject. Why is it that religious people are the first to fall in line with propaganda? Is it because they have been trained to accept blatant lies as truth already?

    If you do not question the events on that day you have your head buried firmly in the sand or in a darker, smellier place!

  • Religious people are the first to fall in line with propaganda? LOL. Now that is a joke. I find the first to fall for conspiracy propaganda are the uneducated who already believe silly things like we never landed on the moon or Big Foot exists. As I have said, I've done the proper homework, checked references, and I know the truth. All you know is the propaganda you've been fed.

  • lopytube. Take that drivel somewhere else. I've studied this and debated it beyond what you could imagine. I've contacted eyewitnesses and experts, and I know the truth. So while you're blocked for violating my clearly posted rules, you might want to do a more thorough job of investigating the issue.

  • It's an amusing little fact that most of the people who think the government was being entirely honest about 9/11 are also more likely to believe the earth is 6000 years old and that the flintstones is a documentary.

  • 33A4C...It is even more amusing fact that people like yourself who tend to think that 911 was some kind of "inside job" are also most likely to ASSUME the beliefs of others without getting their facts in order. The Bible neither gives us the "age" of the earth (6,000 years or otherwise) nor do I subscribe to such ages.

  • oldsk00Ldaz...Bollocks? I don't think so.

  • Oswald iz off the wall..literally

  • Excellent!!

  • What a great video!! 5*s all the way. Thank you for exposing these idiotic conspiracy theorist for what they are, and for that matter what they sound like.

  • allow me to permeate the specificity, excuse me, the banality of your wack video. leave the jokes to the pros.

  • Ok Mr. 1 channel view since 2007...Whatever you say. LOL.

  • Deadmessenger81...perhaps you need a resurrection. All of your questions have been answered already. Check the link to the right. There is no excuse for your ignorance.

  • NIST just completely revised their explanation for building 7. You might want to revise whatever retarded explanation you have on your crappy geocities page as well.

  • sstearns34...What you don't get is that no matter what NIST says, they don't support wild con spiracy theories about building 7. And if you had bothered to READ the "crappy" web page, you would have known that I never even addressed building 7. LOL.

  • Which is ironic because just above this comment, you direct another person to your website to answer his questions about building 7.

  • Yet, this didn't stop you from directing deadmessenger81 to your website for an explanation as to how building 7 came down.

  • That, sstearns34, is because I have several other links on my website that address the building 7 issue.

  • I was going to help defend you but you appear to have it all under control. Good gob.

    You may want to reference a video I got where the Loose Change guys basicaly admit they were very young and took libertys with the truth. search: Hardfire Loose Change Discussion

  • Thanks, dynamitemike65. I will have to look up the Hardfire Loose Change Discussion, even though I knew from the start that these guys were playing fast and loose with the facts.

  • good video dude!

  • Thanks...I enjoyed doing it dude!

  • Goodness, if I didn't know this was a parody I'd be hard-pressed not to consider you a Truther.

    Well done.

  • Thanks, Clunkity...I thought I was clear in my "more info" section to the right where I stand. I was making fun of their claims...because they are FUNNY. LOL

  • Your information in the description box was sufficient in telling the difference between a Truther and what you believe, but man you nailed it in the video for sure.

  • LOL...it still cracks me up.

  • Haha, too perfect

  • You like this video, huh? LOL. Had great fun making it.

  • You like this video, huh? LOL. Had great fun making it.

  • Perhaps not so much a mental stagnation but more like an extremly slugish mental progression. Until humans can learn to do away with ridicule to "radical" ideas then our mental growth will be slower than we can even realize. So, you really should not just blindly ignore a theory that just might actually makes sense and repress it in the back of your mind just because it may not make sense to you or resonate with what you believe to be the accepted norm. Seems like most folk do JUST that.

  • What the heck are you talking about?

  • What I was talking about was in a previous comment I posted. Besides what I was saying is nothing complex anyway. Anyone who can read should be able to gather "what the heck" I am talking about. You have some control over your little space here, so, either you may have removed the comment to try to make me look foolish or it was an error where my comment actually did not post as I thought it would.

  • What I was talking about was in a previous comment I posted. Besides what I was saying is nothing complex anyway. Anyone who can read should be able to gather "what the heck" I am talking about. You have some control over your little space here, so, either you may have removed the comment to try to make me look foolish or it was an error where my comment actually did not post as I thought it would.

  • so this is another appel to ridicule. So the same can be done to you. Funny how many ppl make fun of the facts of one side while not bringing up any on there side...funny to learn of this appel to ridicule and then to learn it appys to so many on this matter. So sad...

  • What's so sad, Krensharpaw, is that you don't seem to understand what humor is. And even sadder, what facts dismiss 911 conspiracy claims. So very sad indeed...

  • ummm. I understand what humer is, but I did not watch this all the way though, as it seemed another debunker video, just pointing and laughing at the other side. What I think is really sad, is your just now making this comment to my comment, which is over 4 weeks old.....ya...go you?!

    Also, I did not say anything about them being dismissed, I said so many ppl bring up stuff without bringing up there own facts, to prove there side. Would you like a mulligan dude?

  • it seemed another debunker video, just pointing and laughing at the other side.

    Of course we laugh at your side. It's funny...how could we not laugh at you.

  • Well, Krensharpaw, you don't seem to even know how to spell humor let alone know what it is. LOL. What's sad is you seem to think that I don't have a life outside YouTube and that I must spend every hour of the day responding to silly folks every second. Not! This was not an informational video. It was satire and ridicule based on facts already researched and studied. If you think 911 was some kind of US government conspiracy, you are beyond sad.

  • hitting a misspelling, go you Fail here. Umm, no I never aid you dotn have a life, just makign a comment to a old one, you could have just left it alone. But you felt you had to make it, so somewhere you dont have alot to do, besides looking for comments to comment on. Fail there. Also, facts? Ummm if you ahd them all, then there would be no debate, no one would be sayuing anyhting agaisn tit, you fail here.

  • Ok, now you don't seem to be able to type properly...that is annoying, along with the fact that you don't have anything relevant to say. See ya...

  • Krensharpaw. There is a good reason for debate. To show people the 9-11 truth movement has an agenda with the US governement, and they are willing to use any national tragedy such as 9-11, Katrina, to start wild conspiracies, and try to draw in the "I hate Bush" crowd. I realize the current admin. is not popular, but to slander victims of such horrible events to advertise a hate agenda is really low. Alex Jones and Dylan avery are rich and still profit from it.

  • Also, its funny how the ppl who claim outside job, use ridicule as evidence, this is not evidence. This is Appel to ridicule. Perhaps bring somethign to the table to prove your side besides this? Seems ppl that chant outside job, dont have shit to prove it, so they point at the other side and just say there wrong. Also, if these things were as you said, studied and researched, then how come you had to make a satire video only pointing out the flaws of one side?

  • Actually, the other side tries to use ridicule, so please don't pretend that you don't. Second, this is comedy not an argument for an outside job. I've already debated someone over this in live chat (PalTalk), and I've done extensive research in this area, including contacting engineers and scientists in person.  So, please take your ignorance and foolish 911 conspiracy claims somewhere else where they will be blindly accepted. That won't work here.

  • ummm. I understand what humer is, but I did not watch this all the way though, as it seemed another debunker video, just pointing and laughing at the other side. What I think is really sad, is your just now making this comment to my comment, which is over 4 weeks old.....ya...go you?!

    Also, I did not say anything about them being dismissed, I said so many ppl bring up stuff without bringing up there own facts, to prove there side. Would you like a mulligan dude?

  • it seemed another debunker video, just pointing and laughing at the other side.

    Of course we laugh at your side. It's funny...how could we not laugh at you.

  • Well, Krensharpaw, you don't seem to even know how to spell humor let alone know what it is. LOL. What's sad is you seem to think that I don't have a life outside YouTube and that I must spend every hour of the day responding to silly folks every second. Not! This was not an informational video. It was satire and ridicule based on facts already researched and studied. If you think 911 was some kind of US government conspiracy, you are beyond sad.

  • hitting a misspelling, go you Fail here. Umm, no I never aid you dotn have a life, just makign a comment to a old one, you could have just left it alone. But you felt you had to make it, so somewhere you dont have alot to do, besides looking for comments to comment on. Fail there. Also, facts? Ummm if you ahd them all, then there would be no debate, no one would be sayuing anyhting agaisn tit, you fail here.