I think its quite plausible-after all, it didn't say that Russian patriotism collapsed, instead merely that they were shocked to have suffered an incursion into their territory. Only part that I have a problem with was the Soviet ability to be able to invade Seattle. Even if the US pacific fleet is redeployed to the atlantic, the Soviets would still have needed to reckon with the Japanese navy.
@prussianhill Japan doesn't have a military or a navy. They have a defense force with small vessels. The Soviet Submarines and Battleships could easily wipe them out. The Soviets have the largest submarine ever made also that can hide in the Arctic Ice Caps.
"Small vessels?" LOL. The Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force is one of the largest and most powerful navies on the planet. Evne at its height, the soviet navy would have only "wiped them out" at the cost of seeing their own force reduced to a bled-out husk unable to carry out any major operations without years of recovery.
The story is extremely plausible, but I they underestimated Russian patriotism, how the fuck would the image of the fatherland crumble if some small platoons of nato infiltrate it, I mean the Americans didnt give up after the Russian invasion either.
@CoDfan2011mw2 You... do realize that England and Germany alone would wipe the floor with a combined China and Russia. The former Warsaw pact countries are pathetic militarily.
Cool story. In open war agianst either China or Russia, Germany woud get steamrolled. The simple numerical disparity in both manpower and equipment is staggering to begin with and would only keep growing bigger. Yeah, this is not the 70's. It's also not the 90's and even then the chances would be against Germany, given the slashing the Bundeswehr was subject to.
Cool story. "Horribly pathetic" besides that they have equipment every bit as good, training every bit as good, doctrine every bit as good and a lot more troops. These ain't some shitty arab yokels with 60's-era soviet surplus.
look, I dont know who you THINK would win, but all I know is this;
if it were to come down to demecratic countries
(North America, Europe, and our minor allies) vs communist countries
(China, Russia, and their minor allies)
in the end, democracy would win, because only rulers and governments like it, the average everyday people from various countries like democracy, if they've never had it before, and you give it to them, then they'll like it too.
That's some nice wishful thinking you have going on there.Now what's really the case is that people actually don't care about democracy. Living standards, prosperity, stability etc. All of these are far more important to the average human and if an authoritarian government can deliver on these, people are all too willing to fall in line.
Let me say this as a person who spent part of his life sitting at the inner-german border, fully expecting to die as a speedbump for 3rd Shock Army: Please shut the fuck up. You have no idea what you are talking about. You have no idea what war really means.
World peace. Hahaha. That's a good joke. Countriesl ike the Middle East? *facepalm*
And funny that, when you look at world peace, it's actually the democratic USA that starte dmore wars lately than any of the countries you named. The only thing that needs to be eliminated are naive, warmongering ideologists like you.
HAHAHA, no. Dream on, kiddo. International relations do not work like that in real life. Nations look out for their own specific interests and do not give a flying fuck about things like "communism" or "democracy". And mankind isn't going to unite under one government, either.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY! Nobody at that level gives a shit about "democracy". The democratic US has no problem supporting dictatorships all over the globe. Take your head out of your ass and ditch those idiotic delusions you are having, please.
Though your post was made 2 months ago, I'd like to add. I agree with You. Actually I believe that dislike between russians and americans was intentionally driven by our governments. "Commies" or "imperialists" - all of that nonsense was invented by intelligence organizations so we hate each other and go to war if there is one. No one cares about us, what Obama is doing in the US is another proof no one cares about democracy. Same as in here.
our people arent afraid to take advantage our weaponry, we have (btf the number of armed civillions is AT LEAST 50 MILLION, we have such a varied environment, that the invaders are not used to, and constantly having to adapt to differnt types.
we have the rocky mountains, as as far as they could HOPE to get.
and we have mexico+canada+European Union+Nato to back us up.
does any one think the other democratic countries are gonna just sit and watch?
if russia (or china) were to invade the west coast, this is pretty much
what would happen.
we americans love our freedom, our country, our leaders, our position as the best country in the world. its one thing to mess with us outside our borders, but if any SOB's wanna try and invade OUR OWN LAND, theyre going DOWN.
we have the best military in the world, our people are extremley partriotic and we are locked and loaded,
they would have had to resort to tactial nuclear weapons, or react quickly to nato resorting to such, and crowded european mainland would have been smoking radiation, neither side would want that so a strategic attack of icbms from russia and america would have sought to collapse the other, the shocking destruction of both would have brought swift ceasefire to europe, and some strange new order more communist than free, what kind of a world? eventually communist. only america stands in the way!
interesting, the soviets do respect the Austrian neutrality, but not the finish one; I guess in RL they would have invaded the country without much thinking
It would be next to impossible to win a war on US soil, by the same token, if the US would invade for instance China, it would be a biblical disaster.
@ColonelAli it could be only possible if the us go bankrupt and so the us millitary would need to be reduced and maybe in that situation you could win that or launching a emp prior to the invasion could help too
*Sigh* they'd never win in the U.S, even with the Chinese. Why invade in the first place. Should've focused on Europe and consolidated their defenses on their pacific borders while hastening the process of forming a concrete alliance with China and NK. As powerful as the U.S is, i don't think they would launch an amphibious assault on a unified russo-sino-korean front.
If the americans had pulled divisions from europe to face the treath on their own soil. The russians might have gained the upper hand in germany, which was a stalemate.
@WolfytheWolf5667 You are almost right. North Korea has 11 million soldiers, (1 million in active duty, 10 million in reserve) that is roughly half the population.
@AzfarAizat i suppose thats your view but you dont know if Russia and China will win if they invaded the US we dont know that its a chance really there is a chance they will win or they will lose when it happens we will just have to sit by and watch to see who wins.
To me, its funny how Soviet propaganda shows the Soviet Army occupying most of Mexico and Canada, and half the continental U.S. and in reality, they cant even get out of the State of Washington!!
@PoliceAir It is kinda funny, but not unreasonable. Dictatorships enjoy stretching the truth and lying bold faced like to their people, trying to save face. Remember Baghdad Bob? Man, that information minister was hilarious!
@FNGLHR so that's what's really going on in iraq,afghanistan(after 9/11) and libya(soon syria will join them)?"bold faced like lying trying to save face"?except in real life,it's US and NAziTO that invades,not Ussr.
@TheErusian Uh huh, I'm sensing some poor former commie pinning for the days of old right about now. And for your information there's a difference between what the USSR lies and when the US decieves it's populous. The US is trying to make sure the enemy doesn't get vital intelligence, the USSR wanted to make sure it's people didn't realise their leaders were idiots.
I don't see what they're lying about anyway, unless you're trying to make the claim Libya's government ISN'T killing civilians.
@TheErusian Iraq had gas, which could cause mass death. Iraq was turned in to a Democracy, we have photographic proof of people voting. In the 21st century Superpowers dont attack eachother, and europe is peaceful for the most part. Straus-Kahn didn't commit a sex crime, as the woman accusing him was known for lying for money. The wikileaks guy may have for all YOU know, thinking you know shit but you dont.
@jonah232 iraq's WMDs weren't proven admitted by tony blair.there's only one superpower in 21'st century but nations do invade others alot.simple voting is not being democratic as votes could be stolen(as they did in albania,russia,iran,etc)the wikileaks guy could have commited sex crimes but not likely cuz in the videos there were also videos of NATO helicopters shooting afghan civillians denied by western governments even until now.
@TheErusian Im not denying everything you said. Iraq didn't have WMD's as defined by the reasons for invading them, but they did have poison gas. That is undisputable. Minor nations do invade eachother, but its usually small conficts over in months. Votes can be stolen, but in the US too. Im not saying the Wikileaks guy didn't, I'm just saying you or I have no proof at all.
@jonah232 you can't compare a first world country to a third,in iraq it's alot more likely that the votes get stolen.they did'nt have a government for almost 7 months until almaleki was elected which gives him plenty of time to cheat.and don't get me wrong by the nations fight.for example you called me a "commie",in return i humiliated your flag.many people in US call russians "russkies" and many people in russia call americans "yankees".that's what i meant.
@jonah232 it was not impossible for saddam to have gas,but i don't know.BUT today's iraq has more than 30000 political prisoners according to UN and amnesty international.this is close to fascism not democracy.and votes can be stolen in the US too but since iraq didn't have a government for nearly 7 months,it's alot likely for them to steal the votes.
@TheErusian They have video and picture proof of the gas, and people talking about how Saddam used it on his own people. It is a proven fact he had gas, undisputable.
@jonah232 they also had photos of sandinists killing civillians but they turned out to be for the former regime,why should this be any different?another undisputable fact is that nearly two million iraqis and afghans immigrated to my country after you invaded and call it free here.if it's free here,just imagine what those countries are now.
@TheErusian Because Saddam Hussein ordered their deaths, his generals even said so. His people were used to massacres but then he started using gas. We interviewed people. Good on those people who immigrated, odds are they couldn't have done that bfore our invasion. Not only that, but Iraq is so much better after out invasion, we spend arguably too much, on building up IRAQI infustructure, not only that, but it's Iraqi dogs that destroy what we build to help you people. Ungrateful IMO.
@jonah232 i think you didn't get it.two million immigrations in 8 years with a 15 million population is no joke.if you've seen interviews i've seen their people.they said they preffered saddam for 2 reasons:
1)they had safety and jobs(which they don't now)
2)you guys invaded their land.
you've spent so much to kill civillians(undisputable,seriously).and just so you know hitler said czechs and polish were ungrateful for not supporting them(the ones who didn't support him obviously)
@TheErusian I'm not saying we SHOULD be there. I'm just saying we are, and we're doing our best to help, not because we care, but because it's strategic.
We do kill civilians, accidents happen, and some sick assholes can get in to the military. I don't want to debate the legitmacy of the Iraqi invasion okay? Because to be honest we had no justification.
Saying they prefered Iraq before our invasion is because they were ignorant of what was happening. Saddam was a sadistic fuck.
5:21: I figured that would happened if we were invaded. You can pretty much bet a lot of Americans will stand up and fight to protect their home and country. Im not sure in other states but in mine, there is guard depots that are meant for civilians in case we are ever invaded and people needed to be armed.
I loved how they used paintings in the briefings. Anyone can take screenshots or make videos, but doing something like this adds a whole new level of atmosphere to the game.
1. 80 million gun owners in the us, well. But can a militia for example hold against very good trained infantry with tanks, choppers and tactical weapons (all kind of bombs except nuclear weapons)
2. Radar can be passed. And when a huge army attacks the US, the US army had to pull back all their troops. Thats why The red army could attack the US in that game.
3. The US had propaganda too. Or do you really think you/they havnt got Propaganda. look at WW 1 and 2
@Playboybauer Don't understand the "the US would never be invaded because we have so many guns" nonsense. As if countries with many gun owners haven't been invaded countless times. There are countless AK-47s in various Iraqi homes, the US still got in just fine.
If the enormous army and nuclear arsenal of the US couldn't stop an invader, a bunch of paranoid coach potatoes/NRA nutters with shotguns, pistols and AK's stand a chance either.
I love how the Soviet Propaganda machine shows how America is 'falling' day by day, and it's met with 'cheering citizens.'
Seriously if the Soviet Union invade the USA, even if the organized American military couldn't do anything about it, millions of citizens would take up arms against them.
Yeah, kinda reminds you of all the press briefings Rummy and the Bush administration fed Americans during the Iraq and Afghan wars. "Oh death throes", "stragglers", "militants", etc. etc
america is well protected by radar systems so today it would almost or is inpossible but back then russias biggest military and navy outnumberd america they could atleast take the us east coast or west but its imppossible to conquer america back then and now so is russia
@KohrsFM Righty, the insurgency in Iraq, with their AK-47s, rocket launchers and IEDs are getting butchered, but the coach potatoes and NRA nutters in the states would throw a whole army back out to sea with ease.
"Enemy tanks, gunships and fighter jets approaching! Get the AK-47!"
Get some education idiot, by the time the US is invaded a foreign army will be forced to leave by the enourmous amount of casulties and $ in a lost war.
Get some education idiot, we are not arab jihadists who run and gun shouting "allahu ackbar" thinking we are invencible.
Oh yeah, I didn't know you could occupy a country with jets and tanks, they better get rid of their infantry..
The Soviet assault is not a campaign, you have to buy the Soviet Assault expansion pack for the game and then the missions become available starting with the invasion of West Berlin.
I love how over-exaggerated the Soviet propaganda is. They show the soviets sweeping through the midwest yet there only got like 5 miles outside Seattle lol
its inpossible to invade the us im dutch but i know this the gun owners military srengt radars anti air missel shields im just glad america is a allie of us
The only cheering citizens happy to be liberated by the Soviets are American Communist & leftist pinko sympathizers, & their just a small minority even back in 89.
Hey, This country has 80 million gun owners, Id hope at least a few fight back if we get invaded. I know that if a foreign army walked the soil of the great state of virginia, me and rest of my boys in the stonewall brigade (116th INF Va army guard) would make them pay dearly.
@Spawn40k Well, I reckon your Ford F-150 and Bud Light aint enough to stop the Russians. Better go back to watching WWE and put away your unreliable M-16's. I reckon. God bless y'all in Jaysus's name I pray.
@Spawn40k That's good only in case of defensive war, but people owning guns like in the USA is wrong thing. You're having a lot of murdering and crimes. Here in Europe we have 5 times less murders than America, wonder why? Yes.
@Zukhov1945 You do realize that if you banned guns, all you're going to do is disarm the upstanding gun owning citizens. The criminals will always have access to firearms, so it makes no sense at all to disarm the few people who might try and stop the criminals. Also a lot of the murders in America are gang related, and non really cares if a bunch of thugs kill each other. Only when they threaten us upstanding citizens, which is why my house is protected by Colt Firearms Co,
Doesn't Britain, have a lot of Gun murders, even though guns are illegal? Our Constitution gives us the right to bear arms, European countries might not but it has been established we need a well kept Militia, in case of a Military take over or invasion.
@Spawn40k china is moving to you, after they shoot out every single sattelite in whole world :'/ so type while youtube is online.. cuz world is going down, maybe as soon as 2012. :P
@Spawn40k Militarily, it is a great advantage. You got 80 million flipping mad guys that would take any chance to fire a bullet against the invaders. For the civilians, it means high ropes. It would be LAPD vs Afro-Americans (minus squad cars, plus APCs) - the enemy would be so nervous they would mistake just about anything for a firearm. "Gun, gun, gun, gun!" *machine gun fire*
@Chesteraptor Who said all i own is a shotgun? And besides if you read what i said, i was referring to me, and the rest of the Infantry unit i serve with in the National Guard, and believe me, we have a lot more than shot guns. troll harder bro
no dallas :C
ThePlaneGuy22 2 months ago
I think its quite plausible-after all, it didn't say that Russian patriotism collapsed, instead merely that they were shocked to have suffered an incursion into their territory. Only part that I have a problem with was the Soviet ability to be able to invade Seattle. Even if the US pacific fleet is redeployed to the atlantic, the Soviets would still have needed to reckon with the Japanese navy.
prussianhill 3 months ago
@prussianhill Japan doesn't have a military or a navy. They have a defense force with small vessels. The Soviet Submarines and Battleships could easily wipe them out. The Soviets have the largest submarine ever made also that can hide in the Arctic Ice Caps.
usjta 2 months ago
@usjta
"Small vessels?" LOL. The Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force is one of the largest and most powerful navies on the planet. Evne at its height, the soviet navy would have only "wiped them out" at the cost of seeing their own force reduced to a bled-out husk unable to carry out any major operations without years of recovery.
Magni56 2 months ago
NATO vs Warsaw pact
vvolf26 3 months ago
The story is extremely plausible, but I they underestimated Russian patriotism, how the fuck would the image of the fatherland crumble if some small platoons of nato infiltrate it, I mean the Americans didnt give up after the Russian invasion either.
osloboez 4 months ago
5:20... seriously man, don't act surprised, they're American citizens. Everyonewould has at least one or maybe two guns in their house.
HomoScorpius 4 months ago
no, they know that if america falls (which isnt too likely) then pretty much all of democracy falls, and that would suck, so theyre gonna back us up.
so Russian, and Chinese people, if your reading this;
BRING IT OOOOOOOOOOOOOON MOTHER F**KERS!!!!
it'll be time to end it once and for all (democracy will win teeeeheee)
well, thats all. this game is accurate
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2 How? At all?
America is not the only democracy, no one is relying on it for democracy.
China and Russia will never go to war with us in this lifetime.
Big5000K 4 months ago
@Big5000K
i know america isnt the only democracy, but were like teh representative of it.
we are the most powerfull demecratic country in the world, the rest of them are pretty weak.
if all of europe united, they could maybe survive a WW3, as in communism vs democracy, maybe.
but if china and russia teamed up, the other countries would do everything they could to keep america going.
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2 You... do realize that England and Germany alone would wipe the floor with a combined China and Russia. The former Warsaw pact countries are pathetic militarily.
Big5000K 4 months ago
@Big5000K
but if it was all off europe+north america vs russia and china, we'd probly win.
especially if all democratic countries instituted IMMEDIATE MANDATORY DRAFTS for all males
(16-18) and older, (depending on the country)
and plus, we would probably get help from other democratic countires other than just mexico, canada, and europe.
in the end, democracy would win
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2 No shit, even Germany alone could take on Russia and China alone. Neither Russia or China have a good military. This is not the 70's.
Big5000K 4 months ago
@Big5000K
a few gov'ts cant beat the world
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@Big5000K
Cool story. In open war agianst either China or Russia, Germany woud get steamrolled. The simple numerical disparity in both manpower and equipment is staggering to begin with and would only keep growing bigger. Yeah, this is not the 70's. It's also not the 90's and even then the chances would be against Germany, given the slashing the Bundeswehr was subject to.
Magni56 4 months ago
@Magni56 Russia and China have horribly pathetic military's even considered against the Germans.
Big5000K 4 months ago
@Big5000K
Cool story. "Horribly pathetic" besides that they have equipment every bit as good, training every bit as good, doctrine every bit as good and a lot more troops. These ain't some shitty arab yokels with 60's-era soviet surplus.
Magni56 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
look, I dont know who you THINK would win, but all I know is this;
if it were to come down to demecratic countries
(North America, Europe, and our minor allies) vs communist countries
(China, Russia, and their minor allies)
in the end, democracy would win, because only rulers and governments like it, the average everyday people from various countries like democracy, if they've never had it before, and you give it to them, then they'll like it too.
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
That's some nice wishful thinking you have going on there.Now what's really the case is that people actually don't care about democracy. Living standards, prosperity, stability etc. All of these are far more important to the average human and if an authoritarian government can deliver on these, people are all too willing to fall in line.
Magni56 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
Let me say this as a person who spent part of his life sitting at the inner-german border, fully expecting to die as a speedbump for 3rd Shock Army: Please shut the fuck up. You have no idea what you are talking about. You have no idea what war really means.
Magni56 4 months ago
@Magni56
I know what it really means, its hell, it sucks, its no fun, it hurts, people get killed.
but in order to obtain world peace, physcho (war like) countries liek China, the middle east, North Korea,
and POSSIBLY Russia need to be converted into democracy/socialism, or be elimiminated.
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
World peace. Hahaha. That's a good joke. Countriesl ike the Middle East? *facepalm*
And funny that, when you look at world peace, it's actually the democratic USA that starte dmore wars lately than any of the countries you named. The only thing that needs to be eliminated are naive, warmongering ideologists like you.
Magni56 4 months ago
@Magni56
basically, in the end, it will be all democratic countries of the world, vs all communist countries of teh world
(socialist countries will have to pick a side)
in the end, one side will win and all of humanity will unite as one species under that type of gov't
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
HAHAHA, no. Dream on, kiddo. International relations do not work like that in real life. Nations look out for their own specific interests and do not give a flying fuck about things like "communism" or "democracy". And mankind isn't going to unite under one government, either.
Magni56 4 months ago
@Magni56
not like one ruler, more like the United Nations, except evry country in the world is in it, they are all democracys,
everything is settled peacefuly.
and all humans work together and stop fighting eachother, stop being such a pessimist
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY! Nobody at that level gives a shit about "democracy". The democratic US has no problem supporting dictatorships all over the globe. Take your head out of your ass and ditch those idiotic delusions you are having, please.
Magni56 4 months ago 9
@Magni56
Though your post was made 2 months ago, I'd like to add. I agree with You. Actually I believe that dislike between russians and americans was intentionally driven by our governments. "Commies" or "imperialists" - all of that nonsense was invented by intelligence organizations so we hate each other and go to war if there is one. No one cares about us, what Obama is doing in the US is another proof no one cares about democracy. Same as in here.
TonyGognitti 2 months ago
@CoDfan2011mw2
ummm, USSR stands for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
senormanable 1 month ago
(PART2)
our people arent afraid to take advantage our weaponry, we have (btf the number of armed civillions is AT LEAST 50 MILLION, we have such a varied environment, that the invaders are not used to, and constantly having to adapt to differnt types.
we have the rocky mountains, as as far as they could HOPE to get.
and we have mexico+canada+European Union+Nato to back us up.
does any one think the other democratic countries are gonna just sit and watch?
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
(PART1)
dude, this game is soooo true, and accurate.
if russia (or china) were to invade the west coast, this is pretty much
what would happen.
we americans love our freedom, our country, our leaders, our position as the best country in the world. its one thing to mess with us outside our borders, but if any SOB's wanna try and invade OUR OWN LAND, theyre going DOWN.
we have the best military in the world, our people are extremley partriotic and we are locked and loaded,
CoDfan2011mw2 4 months ago
they would have had to resort to tactial nuclear weapons, or react quickly to nato resorting to such, and crowded european mainland would have been smoking radiation, neither side would want that so a strategic attack of icbms from russia and america would have sought to collapse the other, the shocking destruction of both would have brought swift ceasefire to europe, and some strange new order more communist than free, what kind of a world? eventually communist. only america stands in the way!
mikefan09 4 months ago
yeah russians are awesome lol
tough n shit
RawrNinjaBurgers 5 months ago
0:10 to 0:17 SO TRUE,REALLY
TheErusian 6 months ago
At 3:51 the USA is CWA ?
what dose that mean?... captiles war animels?
handhanh 6 months ago
@handhanh Thats USA in slavic alphabet
RussianSoldat100 6 months ago
@handhanh Es-Se-Sha = USA
Strauss234 6 months ago
@Strauss234 Thank you ^.^ "
handhanh 6 months ago
use caption at 6:59
andaruzz 7 months ago
Russian here, American citizens must be very brave and patriotic for them to stand up to the Soviet military.
hal0dude7 7 months ago
In the US civilians have the right to bear arms
In Soviet Russia they have the right to arm bears
dariansarr 7 months ago
Oh soviet union. you sould know by know Not to turst thouse chinese.....they fucked you over onces befor >_>
PzGSephy 7 months ago
Please, i need to know what is the name of the song that starts at 00:25.. Please is important..
andreshawk13 8 months ago
interesting, the soviets do respect the Austrian neutrality, but not the finish one; I guess in RL they would have invaded the country without much thinking
MTTT1234 8 months ago
It would be next to impossible to win a war on US soil, by the same token, if the US would invade for instance China, it would be a biblical disaster.
ColonelAli 10 months ago
@ColonelAli it could be only possible if the us go bankrupt and so the us millitary would need to be reduced and maybe in that situation you could win that or launching a emp prior to the invasion could help too
athomicritics 7 months ago
@Spawn40k i think if any country is invaded by a foreign army the inhabitants would give them hell before they would surrender
MrBuzzLastyear 10 months ago
*Sigh* they'd never win in the U.S, even with the Chinese. Why invade in the first place. Should've focused on Europe and consolidated their defenses on their pacific borders while hastening the process of forming a concrete alliance with China and NK. As powerful as the U.S is, i don't think they would launch an amphibious assault on a unified russo-sino-korean front.
AzfarAizat 10 months ago
@AzfarAizat
If the americans had pulled divisions from europe to face the treath on their own soil. The russians might have gained the upper hand in germany, which was a stalemate.
Greatherlorre 10 months ago
@AzfarAizat
Korea has 11 million people. Given good tech...
they could very well rule the world if Kim Jong wasn't a complete idiot. He's like Hitler:
a poor pathetic man thinking he can rule a country. -.-
WolfytheWolf5667 9 months ago
@WolfytheWolf5667 You are almost right. North Korea has 11 million soldiers, (1 million in active duty, 10 million in reserve) that is roughly half the population.
marcus8374 9 months ago
@AzfarAizat i suppose thats your view but you dont know if Russia and China will win if they invaded the US we dont know that its a chance really there is a chance they will win or they will lose when it happens we will just have to sit by and watch to see who wins.
sniper00342 8 months ago
Ahhhh this game was SO great with a SUPERB story. But then again, people seem to find Starcraft easier to understand..
victorcachat 11 months ago
@victorcachat ZERG RUSH!... jk jk i would play this game over star craft and C&C anyday since EA is killing the C&C series :( miss Westwood
sniper00342 8 months ago
reality Chinese prefer to neutralise Anzus Australia ATasmania and New Zeland before going after anyone else
athrunmanly 1 year ago
0:00 - 0:30 Wtf is that accent supposed to be? Sean Connery speaking american russian?
freshaca3 1 year ago
hmm if malashenko's plan to execute 10 random civivlians might stop the militia attacks but then again it might not they hate the russians enough
DinokillerSithlord 1 year ago
to bad the US militia get owned in the WIC game
TheZeonMovement1 1 year ago
@TheZeonMovement1 The makers probably haven´t watched red dawn :D
justmymage 1 year ago
capitalist! i'll crush you good!
Z2recoil 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NOOOO......Mexico ..why???? 3:50
Nabongo117 1 year ago
NOOOOO mexico ....why....????
Nabongo117 1 year ago
fantastic game, its a shame the campaign is so short
Roland9x 1 year ago
To me, its funny how Soviet propaganda shows the Soviet Army occupying most of Mexico and Canada, and half the continental U.S. and in reality, they cant even get out of the State of Washington!!
PoliceAir 1 year ago 18
@PoliceAir THIS IS PROPAGANDA
kursk1111111111 1 year ago 5
@kursk1111111111 Ok......... i didnt mean to offend anyone by that comment.
PoliceAir 1 year ago
@PoliceAir It is kinda funny, but not unreasonable. Dictatorships enjoy stretching the truth and lying bold faced like to their people, trying to save face. Remember Baghdad Bob? Man, that information minister was hilarious!
FNGLHR 6 months ago
@FNGLHR so that's what's really going on in iraq,afghanistan(after 9/11) and libya(soon syria will join them)?"bold faced like lying trying to save face"?except in real life,it's US and NAziTO that invades,not Ussr.
TheErusian 6 months ago
@TheErusian Uh huh, I'm sensing some poor former commie pinning for the days of old right about now. And for your information there's a difference between what the USSR lies and when the US decieves it's populous. The US is trying to make sure the enemy doesn't get vital intelligence, the USSR wanted to make sure it's people didn't realise their leaders were idiots.
I don't see what they're lying about anyway, unless you're trying to make the claim Libya's government ISN'T killing civilians.
FNGLHR 6 months ago
@FNGLHR you don't see them cuz 13 stripes blocks the way.if you really believe everything your government tells you,i weep for you.here are some lies:
1)iraq has WMDs
2)iraq suddenly turned into a democracy after invasion
3)"in 21st century,nations don't attack each other"
4)straus-kahn and the owner of wiki-leaks whose name i can't spell commited sex crimes
today is aug 19th,58th anniversary of the coup your CIA staged in my country,destroyed our real leader and brought forth a dictator.
TheErusian 6 months ago
@TheErusian Iraq had gas, which could cause mass death. Iraq was turned in to a Democracy, we have photographic proof of people voting. In the 21st century Superpowers dont attack eachother, and europe is peaceful for the most part. Straus-Kahn didn't commit a sex crime, as the woman accusing him was known for lying for money. The wikileaks guy may have for all YOU know, thinking you know shit but you dont.
jonah232 6 months ago
@jonah232 iraq's WMDs weren't proven admitted by tony blair.there's only one superpower in 21'st century but nations do invade others alot.simple voting is not being democratic as votes could be stolen(as they did in albania,russia,iran,etc)the wikileaks guy could have commited sex crimes but not likely cuz in the videos there were also videos of NATO helicopters shooting afghan civillians denied by western governments even until now.
TheErusian 6 months ago
@TheErusian Im not denying everything you said. Iraq didn't have WMD's as defined by the reasons for invading them, but they did have poison gas. That is undisputable. Minor nations do invade eachother, but its usually small conficts over in months. Votes can be stolen, but in the US too. Im not saying the Wikileaks guy didn't, I'm just saying you or I have no proof at all.
jonah232 6 months ago
@jonah232 you can't compare a first world country to a third,in iraq it's alot more likely that the votes get stolen.they did'nt have a government for almost 7 months until almaleki was elected which gives him plenty of time to cheat.and don't get me wrong by the nations fight.for example you called me a "commie",in return i humiliated your flag.many people in US call russians "russkies" and many people in russia call americans "yankees".that's what i meant.
TheErusian 6 months ago
@jonah232 it was not impossible for saddam to have gas,but i don't know.BUT today's iraq has more than 30000 political prisoners according to UN and amnesty international.this is close to fascism not democracy.and votes can be stolen in the US too but since iraq didn't have a government for nearly 7 months,it's alot likely for them to steal the votes.
TheErusian 5 months ago
@TheErusian They have video and picture proof of the gas, and people talking about how Saddam used it on his own people. It is a proven fact he had gas, undisputable.
jonah232 5 months ago
@jonah232 they also had photos of sandinists killing civillians but they turned out to be for the former regime,why should this be any different?another undisputable fact is that nearly two million iraqis and afghans immigrated to my country after you invaded and call it free here.if it's free here,just imagine what those countries are now.
TheErusian 5 months ago
@TheErusian Because Saddam Hussein ordered their deaths, his generals even said so. His people were used to massacres but then he started using gas. We interviewed people. Good on those people who immigrated, odds are they couldn't have done that bfore our invasion. Not only that, but Iraq is so much better after out invasion, we spend arguably too much, on building up IRAQI infustructure, not only that, but it's Iraqi dogs that destroy what we build to help you people. Ungrateful IMO.
jonah232 5 months ago
@jonah232 i think you didn't get it.two million immigrations in 8 years with a 15 million population is no joke.if you've seen interviews i've seen their people.they said they preffered saddam for 2 reasons:
1)they had safety and jobs(which they don't now)
2)you guys invaded their land.
you've spent so much to kill civillians(undisputable,seriously).and just so you know hitler said czechs and polish were ungrateful for not supporting them(the ones who didn't support him obviously)
TheErusian 5 months ago
@TheErusian I'm not saying we SHOULD be there. I'm just saying we are, and we're doing our best to help, not because we care, but because it's strategic.
We do kill civilians, accidents happen, and some sick assholes can get in to the military. I don't want to debate the legitmacy of the Iraqi invasion okay? Because to be honest we had no justification.
Saying they prefered Iraq before our invasion is because they were ignorant of what was happening. Saddam was a sadistic fuck.
jonah232 5 months ago
@TheErusian Poison gas.
jonah232 6 months ago
@FNGLHR just so you know,we still aren't a democracy.
TheErusian 6 months ago
I would so start my own rebellion if Russians invade NY XD
GAMEFAN501 1 year ago
Better dead than Red!
ajsaccount1991 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ajsaccount1991 Where's democracy and freedom of speech if you can't be red?
r4f4st4n1 1 year ago
@ajsaccount1991 better red, than dead.
VVUULDTUURRM 1 year ago
the best cutscenes games are Homeworld 2 and WIC, best cutsenes ever
Gurkmomma 1 year ago
"western propaganda about soviet propaganda" =)
38602 1 year ago 2
comrade, give me this loading screens!
RM71063 1 year ago
5:21: I figured that would happened if we were invaded. You can pretty much bet a lot of Americans will stand up and fight to protect their home and country. Im not sure in other states but in mine, there is guard depots that are meant for civilians in case we are ever invaded and people needed to be armed.
crazyfrywad 1 year ago
Love the Soviet Propaganda.
Pelicanproverb 1 year ago
a great and a funny game
19Aviationmax94 1 year ago
I loved how they used paintings in the briefings. Anyone can take screenshots or make videos, but doing something like this adds a whole new level of atmosphere to the game.
MidgardEagle 1 year ago
i'll try to blance the comments
1. 80 million gun owners in the us, well. But can a militia for example hold against very good trained infantry with tanks, choppers and tactical weapons (all kind of bombs except nuclear weapons)
2. Radar can be passed. And when a huge army attacks the US, the US army had to pull back all their troops. Thats why The red army could attack the US in that game.
3. The US had propaganda too. Or do you really think you/they havnt got Propaganda. look at WW 1 and 2
Playboybauer 1 year ago
@Playboybauer
At your first comment,
I'm not so sure... just look at what happened at Vietnam.
At three,
Free press is now propaganda? Yeah, a few posters here and there during ww2, but i'm not so sure it would be far as "Propaganda".
downloadgoblin 1 year ago
@Playboybauer Don't understand the "the US would never be invaded because we have so many guns" nonsense. As if countries with many gun owners haven't been invaded countless times. There are countless AK-47s in various Iraqi homes, the US still got in just fine.
If the enormous army and nuclear arsenal of the US couldn't stop an invader, a bunch of paranoid coach potatoes/NRA nutters with shotguns, pistols and AK's stand a chance either.
MidgardEagle 1 year ago
even if europe was invaded in real life we would hold off the russians but still america is a great ally and europe is a great ally for america
TheGeert33 1 year ago 3
I like these cutscenes better than the original WiC's.
redsoxfan1984 1 year ago
WTF, you can't invade the mainland USA, it's not even possible. Not even by a shred of chance.
One rifle behind every blade of grass.
KohrsFM 1 year ago
I love how the Soviet Propaganda machine shows how America is 'falling' day by day, and it's met with 'cheering citizens.'
Seriously if the Soviet Union invade the USA, even if the organized American military couldn't do anything about it, millions of citizens would take up arms against them.
redsoxfan1984 1 year ago
The militia is proven invencible!
KohrsFM 1 year ago
@redsoxfan1984
Yeah, kinda reminds you of all the press briefings Rummy and the Bush administration fed Americans during the Iraq and Afghan wars. "Oh death throes", "stragglers", "militants", etc. etc
hyethga 1 year ago
@redsoxfan1984
as would the soviets
Mastakilla91 1 year ago
america is well protected by radar systems so today it would almost or is inpossible but back then russias biggest military and navy outnumberd america they could atleast take the us east coast or west but its imppossible to conquer america back then and now so is russia
34ytrhtrghrf 1 year ago
@KohrsFM Righty, the insurgency in Iraq, with their AK-47s, rocket launchers and IEDs are getting butchered, but the coach potatoes and NRA nutters in the states would throw a whole army back out to sea with ease.
"Enemy tanks, gunships and fighter jets approaching! Get the AK-47!"
Yeah ****ing right. Get over yourself.
MidgardEagle 1 year ago
@MidgardEagle
all i heard was blablabla "NRA nuts" bla bla bla.
Get some education idiot, by the time the US is invaded a foreign army will be forced to leave by the enourmous amount of casulties and $ in a lost war.
Get some education idiot, we are not arab jihadists who run and gun shouting "allahu ackbar" thinking we are invencible.
Oh yeah, I didn't know you could occupy a country with jets and tanks, they better get rid of their infantry..
KohrsFM 1 year ago
@KohrsFM "all i heard was blablabla "NRA nuts" bla bla bla."
Your problem, not mine.
MidgardEagle 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i wish sotives took over US should have first took europe then all of it forces on USA instead of spitting em up
TheJerico246 2 years ago
I seach the Music at 2:47
BelmontBitterman 2 years ago
These cutscenes are not in order by the way,
Kastrenzo74 2 years ago 10
RUSSIA FOREVEEEEER!!!
racdenis 2 years ago
how do i start soviet assault campaign?
34ytrhtrghrf 2 years ago
Start a new Campaign,
You need to have purchased the expack though
Kastrenzo74 2 years ago
@34ytrhtrghrf
The Soviet assault is not a campaign, you have to buy the Soviet Assault expansion pack for the game and then the missions become available starting with the invasion of West Berlin.
Have fun.
Luke94711 2 years ago
hey, for you who play soviet assault, come join me on my hamachi server so we can play some nice laggfree gaming of WiC!
*serv: wic-lan27*
*code: lol*
Tinnesa 2 years ago
I love how over-exaggerated the Soviet propaganda is. They show the soviets sweeping through the midwest yet there only got like 5 miles outside Seattle lol
DevildogBK 2 years ago
ahaha i know right "cheering citizens" my ass, more like mine laying gun happy americans. Thats soviet propaganda for you though
poonjoo 2 years ago 5
The Zvezda on the first mission are pretty sweet! :)
ThePanzerLeader 2 years ago
go nato and usa!!!!!!!!!!!!
34ytrhtrghrf 2 years ago
its inpossible to invade the us im dutch but i know this the gun owners military srengt radars anti air missel shields im just glad america is a allie of us
34ytrhtrghrf 2 years ago 4
Hey commies! Get that sickle's shadow off my state!
MrJohn2010 2 years ago 2
@MrJohn2010 wich american state are you from?
34ytrhtrghrf 2 years ago
Alabama
MrJohn2010 2 years ago
@MrJohn2010 long live the confederateaaah!
34ytrhtrghrf 2 years ago
lol
MrJohn2010 2 years ago
lol ur from Washington?
DevildogBK 2 years ago
Comment removed
ComradPaco 2 years ago
5:23
God Bless the 2nd Amendment & the USA >)
I would do the same
DellMan94 2 years ago
Comment removed
CheGuevara501 2 years ago
Comment removed
CheGuevara501 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
makes me sick how the soviet media lies to the people.............................actually the soviets make me sick
BattlestarHailfire 2 years ago
western media isn't better dude
Scoutrussp7 2 years ago 4
The only cheering citizens happy to be liberated by the Soviets are American Communist & leftist pinko sympathizers, & their just a small minority even back in 89.
phildaguy 2 years ago 5
well its a good game ;)
foxy123ok 2 years ago 3
5:21 figured american citizens wouldn't be so pleased
poonjoo 2 years ago 26
Hey, This country has 80 million gun owners, Id hope at least a few fight back if we get invaded. I know that if a foreign army walked the soil of the great state of virginia, me and rest of my boys in the stonewall brigade (116th INF Va army guard) would make them pay dearly.
Spawn40k 2 years ago 29
And Canadians and Brits call us bloodthirsty for being able to own automatic weapons.
Rangerpl1322 2 years ago
@Spawn40k
HOOAH!
cardude024 1 year ago
@Spawn40k Well, I reckon your Ford F-150 and Bud Light aint enough to stop the Russians. Better go back to watching WWE and put away your unreliable M-16's. I reckon. God bless y'all in Jaysus's name I pray.
rustaayy 1 year ago
@rustaayy Yea, too bad im from the city and not a redneck or else that comment might offend me.
Spawn40k 1 year ago
@Spawn40k haha it hard to convey a satirical tone with a keyboard.
rustaayy 1 year ago
@rustaayy gotcha
Spawn40k 1 year ago
@Spawn40k That's good only in case of defensive war, but people owning guns like in the USA is wrong thing. You're having a lot of murdering and crimes. Here in Europe we have 5 times less murders than America, wonder why? Yes.
Zukhov1945 1 year ago
@Zukhov1945 You do realize that if you banned guns, all you're going to do is disarm the upstanding gun owning citizens. The criminals will always have access to firearms, so it makes no sense at all to disarm the few people who might try and stop the criminals. Also a lot of the murders in America are gang related, and non really cares if a bunch of thugs kill each other. Only when they threaten us upstanding citizens, which is why my house is protected by Colt Firearms Co,
Spawn40k 1 year ago
@Zukhov1945
Doesn't Britain, have a lot of Gun murders, even though guns are illegal? Our Constitution gives us the right to bear arms, European countries might not but it has been established we need a well kept Militia, in case of a Military take over or invasion.
gibben100 1 year ago
@Spawn40k china is moving to you, after they shoot out every single sattelite in whole world :'/ so type while youtube is online.. cuz world is going down, maybe as soon as 2012. :P
omarfaw 1 year ago
@Spawn40k if they touched Minnesota theyd f ing DIE!!!!!!!!
ryanthesoldier 10 months ago
@Spawn40k Militarily, it is a great advantage. You got 80 million flipping mad guys that would take any chance to fire a bullet against the invaders. For the civilians, it means high ropes. It would be LAPD vs Afro-Americans (minus squad cars, plus APCs) - the enemy would be so nervous they would mistake just about anything for a firearm. "Gun, gun, gun, gun!" *machine gun fire*
ColonelAli 9 months ago
@Spawn40k
Amen to that!
scarface8999 7 months ago
@Spawn40k you really think that your shotguns would stop t-90?
Chesteraptor 7 months ago
@Chesteraptor Who said all i own is a shotgun? And besides if you read what i said, i was referring to me, and the rest of the Infantry unit i serve with in the National Guard, and believe me, we have a lot more than shot guns. troll harder bro
Spawn40k 7 months ago 4
@Spawn40k americans crazy people crazy people ibet you have an m1 in your garage !
azotjakter09 7 months ago
@Spawn40k I respect your bravery, but the power ratio would probably be 3:1. Since they would have Hinds, T-90s, BTR-80s, AK-101s and snipers.
hal0dude7 7 months ago
@poonjoo
I'd be kickin' ass too!
cardude024 1 year ago
@poonjoo Right
PoliceAir 1 year ago
It is not that diffrent from our own propaganda. Soviet WAS good at secretsy.
Bidmartinlo 2 years ago 5
i like the differences between the soviet propoganda and romanov descriptions of the war
goofoffproductions 2 years ago 5