Interview with H.I.M Reza Shah Pahlavi Part 1

[amirbk60]

The interviewer asks him "Can someone criticize you in your country" and He answers "No, no one can criticize the king". I think that is really what freedom and democracy about! I think the case is clear! If you are Shahi you are anti democracy and anti freedom

[KasiKeEsmDare]

mashala



[DrMelWaters]

I wemeber some LaCrosse players that wer called Wapists! I wemember a security guard in Atwanta that was called a Tewowist! And I seem to wemember something about weopons of mass destwuction...

[DrMelWaters]

I wemember when he was called a bwoodsucker? What an idiot. This is embarrassing.

[behiir11]

شما از بچگی تنها کاری که بلد بودید مصاحبه بوده

[TheAbdullaQTR]

Pahlavis will never rule the Iranian nation again!

[TheAbdullaQTR]

Payendeh many va javadan Jumhoory Islami Iran!

[uswaiter]

@famemonster1993

Obviously you are a misinformed pro Pahlavi dyNASTY. The STUPID Shah gave the winning ACE card to the relious Mullahs backed by UK & USA the moment he opened his mouth after his plane crash (1968) uttered the stupid following," I am alive today because I felt Imam Ali's hands saving me from the crash" You can research it for yourself.

C) You may respond only when you have done your homework (FULLY). Get your facts first then talk otherwise YOU ARE JUST FARTING THRU YOUR MOUTH

[KaiserJames]

Javid Shah!

Javid Shah!

Javid Shah!

[KaiserJames]

Did the Iranians really think they'd get peace and freedom in 79 by deposing the Shah and trusting the mullahs? Were they that stupid? They got more pain and death from the mullah regime than they ever got from the Shah.

[vahid817]

barbara walters is a terrible interviewer!!!!

[uswaiter]

@famemonster1993 Your name calling represents your education and awareness about the 3 groups mentioned above and since SILENCE IS THE ONLY ANSWER TO THE MENTALLY CHALLENGED, I choose SILENCE where you are concerned. However wake up and smell the coffee.

[stephenabm]

Walters is a leftist!

[uswaiter]

Down with Islamic Republic, Pahlavi Regime, Mojahedin and other idiots who rape Iran during their ruling

[doostdarat]

Look at these ideots in the video walking around with crowns on theri heads. Now their demented son wants to become another one with crown on his head. He thinks people want to go back go Ghajar time. Does he think people of Iran are stupid? Can he not see this is the age of technology and not a time that people would want a useless king ruling them? I think he needs to grow up or at least wake up and smell the coffee.

[613072100]

ye mosht chaploos, ridam be to rrohe khodesho babash

[cooolsoon]

THIS IS ABOUT A DICTATOR ZADEH HAST KEY YEK DICTATORSHIP SHAHEH

DUZD BEGAL KARDE.MIRZA REZA

99%PEOPLE OF AZERBAYJAN TURK MUGOL HATE U. DIBA.PARS

[princessofpeace88]

Viva Pahlavi Dynasty!!!! We love you...!!!!! He will live forever in our hearts !!

God bless him....

[intelligentpersian]

I wonder after certain collapse of Mubarak's dictatorship in Egypt, poor Reza should pick-up Shah's remains and find another country to bury his remains? Perhaps his remains, exactly like himself, is going to become a homeless refugee from one country to another to find a permanent place to rest. Strange world, for some people final punishment in hell happens at the very same world that they are living. Hopefully that becomes faith of every tyrant and dictator, including current mullah.

[Coptic78]

I hate this bitch....like every american stupid, don´t knowing shit about the world but likes to dictate to the rest of the Planet what is right and wrong

[eslubin]

@Coptic78 that's very judgmental and dictatorial of you, seeming to know what is right and what is wrong

[Paris701]

IRAN PEOPLE ONLY HOPE IS REZA PAHLAVI , BUT STILL AMERICAN MEDIA SUPPORT ISLAMIC REGIME IN IRAN ,

[jameswobler]

A disposable Poppet of the West – Empty shells and the feeling of inferiority was killing them; and the rest is Bullshit only fooling themselves; what a shame! He should go a hang himself if he has any degnity

[DrPepperBeatsCoke]

One question if this guy cares so much about Iran then why doesn't he try to regain power like his dad did in 1953?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@DrPepperBeatsCoke  you think it's that easy?

[DrPepperBeatsCoke]

@laylafrackiewicz If the regime is so unpopular then yes

[chicken4247]

@laylafrackiewicz dont bother urself too much with inept idiots

[Y2JROCKFAN]

@DrPepperBeatsCoke lol your funny... it was the CIA that helped Pahlavi back in 53...

[shitonMOHAMMAD]

@DrPepperBeatsCoke

his father had the backing of the british and americans

[brettishfan]

@shitonMOHAMMAD No, the Shah tolerated them due to circumstances, he actually was the one fought back, if you really do your research for that era, you'll find out how he did it through the oil deals with the Brits.

[khoharo]

fuck the king

[sandelf]

long live Reza Pahlavi

marg bar mojahedin kasif khaen

marg bar tudeh party

[mafiososamgiancana]

inshallah Reza shah will take iran and be the KING and i will salute him ameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen god I WISH THIS DAY COMES

[Persiian1]

Fucking monarchists.

Pahlavi and the mullahs, same shit - different decade.

[laylafrackiewicz]

you're trying to compare sugar with salt.

how can you call the pahlavi era shit. it brought iran prosperety women's suffrage and the list goes on and on. what has the islamic regime brought to iran. nothing but embarrasment and a bad image.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz come on! he'd be a puppet, just like saddam and osama. dont be foolish. islam brought a democratic system, you want a western one? what difference does it make to anything other than an iranians ego, to have a king in their land. none.

you think america will lift its sanctions if there is a king in iran? remember they took the king out of power, because he spoke against zionism.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen . not only because he spoke out against zionism, the truth is never black and white, there had to be more than one reason why the west didn't give the shah the support when he most needed it, for that the west has failed and iran paid the price for it. i couldn't disagree more when you say he was a puppet. besides you contradict yourself. why would the west take a "puppet" out of power hmm? it's only to their own benifit. shah was clearly not a puppet.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@laylafrackiewicz continue: as for reza cyrus pahlavi. i don't know if he would be a puppet or not. because quit frankly i don't think there will ever be a monarchy again in iran. i'm a monarchist so i prefer that system, but i'm realistic enough to know that most iranian don't want the monarchy again.what i want is freedom human rights and secularism in iran. no matter what argument you come up with you can never convice that democracy can excist under an islamic goverment.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz it is better to have a non-secular nation, ok you cant hold hands or flash your tits at every unexpecting guy, but it also raises the tier of thought and society.

what you speak of are western ideologies, and they serve little purpose except to justify the prostitution alcohol and gambling they stirred in iraq. these are things to keep people occupied, so that the government can slowly be occupied, and well, the people are easy to control.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz secularism in iran is useless again, it just further allows both to be infiltrated.

currently there is a democracy in iran, equivalent to the west's democracy, however, you see the people who are in power above the government, in the west, they fear to show their faces.

democracy as it stands in the world, does not work, it does not give the people what they want, not even western democracy.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen okay i admitt that western democracy isn't flawless, yes there is corruption. but i would rather live in a western democracy than in iran where there is a " so called democracy". but im not agreeing that secularism is useless in iran, look at neiboring turkey, they have secularism there, so why can't iran?

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz western democracy IS a so called democracy, infact all democracies are such. however, ahmadinejad tells you this openly, western democracy requires enforcement of its political beliefs by military force. can you understand the difference?

iran can, iran did, and it left iran open to have the shah ousted. dont fear islam just because western-cultural propoganda has 'blended' politics/religion/race/culture­, into one, "terrorist-sand-niggers", do you understand?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen yes but most "terrorist-sand-niggers" are muslims. you speak about islam, what about khomeini and the thousands of children he made so called martyrs in iran-iraq war. this could never happend when the shah was still in place. he strugled for years to keep peace with iraq.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz and his peace keeping turned him into a zionist supporter, they made him eat his words. iran has always saught to protect jews, but zionism is a political movement hell bent on world domination, through economic stranglehold, distraction and military might.

would you rather your country was taken by an arabic puppet dictator, or die for the independence of your country?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen shah was not arabic a puppet or a dictator.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz he wasnt, but he lost his power because he sided with the zionists, and they used that to infiltrate his rule, and because he spoke out against them, they sullied his reputation, by inflating him as "the king of kings" etc etc, and then at the same time mocked him.

[daenumen]

@daenumen do you think that because in the US you can choose between republican and democratic that it gives you any greater rites to influence what either/or party does whilst in power? the answer is no.

you vote away your rites to influence in any democracy. democracy is a stones throw from a dictatorship, only you get to choose who represents the country politically, you do not decide what plans they undertake.

[daenumen]

@daenumen the green movement in iran was a zionist attempt to allow america straight into iranian government.

the youth in iran believe they know all about iran, but they are not listening to their parents, they are listening to western influences, that seek, as they have sought, only to supress iran, which at current they are struggling to do, the green party would have handed iran over to zion.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen the green movement was there because the youth is fed up with its medieval government.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz medieval government?! its that government that provided the democratic system that allowed the green movement to even represent itself as a political entity!

the green movement would have gotten rid of iran, it was set up by the british.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen yes that fucking amazing goverment that hangs people in the street for beeing homosexual!

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz homosexuality is wrong. it does not produce children, men believing they can give men something a woman cant? its a fallacy.

you think sex and lust is more important than having children?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen humanity is most important. sex and lust are just as important as children. i do not say as 'having children' because some people do not choose to have them. why so fixated at producing children? most sexual intercouses between men and women are for pleasure and love. feelings homosexuals also have.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz are you sure homosexual acts are humain? if i was to use a shoe as a cup, is that a positive lesson for humanity?

do you not see that the pleasures of sex are for the purpose of promoting the process of having children? to encourage that?

what good does homosexuality do to society? you think homosexual sex education at the age of 10-11 is good? and healthy? to teach children of sodomy as acceptable?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen yes homosexual are human because it involves love or lust ore pleasure, the same feelings that are know between man and women are known to homosexuals too. some of the greatest men in history were homosexuals, i don't have to tell you the names you google it, they are so known! pleasure of sex is not only for producing children. what about childless couples, don't you they enjoy their sexlife? so if some famous people were homosexuals then they did a lot of good for society.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz im sure you are aware then firstly, that the majority of the notable homosexuals are 'modern' 1900s, and involved in the media industries, and i include politics under that group, and again, that they were predominantly English and American.

This is not a question of pleasure, many things in life are pleasurable but that does not condone them as positive wrt the influence on society.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz what makes you think there work was any better than a hetrosexuals, or even comparable?? are modern writers and musicians as eloquent and elegant in their arts than the hetrosexual greats that preceeded them?

should we then also permit pedophiles? they believe it is natural too, are we persecuting them also? both are sexual perversions, from what nature dictates as being naturally reproductive. breathing is pleasurable, though you only realise when you loose your breathe.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz are you sure homosexuals feel the same pleasure? they do not feel the pleasure of natural sex. are you suggesting that a rectum is equivalent to a womans sexual organs?

do you think that the prostate is not stimulated in natural sex? have you looked at male sexual anatomy?

has their promotion of homosexuality been productive for people? or has it complicated sex, sexual education, and legitimised a perversion and abuse of anatomy?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen homosexuality is natural because it excists as long as heterosexualtity. even among animals it happens. anyway this discussion has taken a weird turn. i don't want to get in any more further details with you. i don't see the point. sorry, closed.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz well ok, but the occurences in animals have only occured in captivity, and in controlled social groups, ie they were not natural circumstances.

also, everytime a people have become homosexual, they have either died out, or being wiped out by disease, yes medical intervention may help, but even HIV requires medication and children to be born.

bye!

[daenumen]

@daenumen can you not see, they could not take iraq or afghanistan without bombing and war, subversively placing puppet governments in power that only appease the people by helping to reduce the lawlessness they caused. they commited war crimes, as do the israelis (exclusion zone, occupation of territory, undeclared wmd), but they do not act to prevent these crimes.

they pictorally presented muslims as "devils", in the crusades, that were initiated by the byzantine empire, not the pope or god.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen on this i do agree

[daenumen]

@daenumen have you seen the films of bulldozers piling bodies into mass graves? they were british bulldozers, burying bodies of typhus victims. they presented this, along with the black propoganda leaflets dropped over germany and fake radio stations, that depicted the nazis as terrible people. 'germans' are still seen as nazis (it was a political party). despite the nazi party until 1942 searching for a land to deport the jews to.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen i hope you don't support the nazi party now. i don't regard germans as nazis. my mother lived in germany for 14 years.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz how could i support the nazi party?! it doesnt exist? do you understand now???

[daenumen]

@daenumen have you seen the pictures of the first zionist meeting 1897? it wasnt anything like you would expect a persecuted people to be meeting like. the marble floor they met on costs more than perhaps your house does.

do you remember the british captured palestine in 1915? that they had a jewish legion? that the zionists fled from russia before the bolshevics lost power and planned the biasing of the british mandate of palestine? that stirred the conflict with the arabs initially?

[daenumen]

@daenumen do you realise america is founded by the freemasons? the george washington inaugural bible is what the presidents swear their alligance to.

that the sephardic jews, who appeared in spain, after the collapse of the islamic empire, without records of origins, who then moved on to found america?

do you know of the judaizers? who inflitrated christianity, removed jesus' gospel and depicted christians as 'a bud' of gentiles whos perpose is to serve the "chosen people"?

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen as for america to be founded by freemasons. that's not really a big secret is it? look at the history or discovery channel.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz its the only secret society, and it had the power to enact that legislation, and found a nation.

it is not as innocent as rituals and gatherings.

[daenumen]

@daenumen please learn on what is going on in the western government before believing the mass media that tells you what to believe, that tells you islam is evil, but does not tell you that saddam and osama were arabic (not native to iraq or afghanistan) and both were in close ties with western zionist governments through the saudi royals, and the buisness relations they share. that both were funded by USD, and the chemical weapons they found in iraq were american, from the iran-iraq war??

[daenumen]

@daenumen do you even remember that bush called war on iraq before WTC incident even happened? that the planes blew up before either the engines, or fuel in the wings hit the buildings? that they were both unmarked planes? that the flight control radar had been 'switched off' for practice tests that morning, hence the planes were not shot down, when it was off course and out of radio contact for long enough to be intercepted? that no WMD's were used in the attack?

[daenumen]

@daenumen that 'terrorism' is not defined in international law? that bush called america a christian nation (it is secular) an called a war against 'muslims'? that the UN prohibited the "war on iraq/afghanistan", but careful wording ie "war on terror" allowed the legal grey area to be used to 'legitamise' the invasions and occupations of these countries? that this happened before in the late 1970's when saddam and osama came into power? as they cut a path through the middle east?

[daenumen]

@daenumen barrack obama when he was coming to power called for and promised an end to all war, and within a few days of swearing his alligance to the inaugural bible, then called war on iran, who at this point was asking for diplomatic relations? and sent more troops to afghanistan?

the western democracy gives the people what they have been told to want, no more, and paints the entire world outside of its reach as evil satanic and must be destroyed.

[daenumen]

@daenumen that these attacks they label terror attacks, were all as a response to the 7million USD a day USA supports israelis illegal war with? and blots out any comments from the other side, and now because they are all called "terrorists" it is as though one should not even listen to a fair argument, ie take one side only, what the western government is telling you, acting as the worlds judge jury and prosecution, hence 'must' be right (in reality their 5000+ nuclear arsenal.)

[daenumen]

@daenumen you realise america is in direct breach of both the IAEA and NPT because of its support of both india and israelis with undeclared nuclear weapons? that if america was to attempt to join now, as a non signed nation, they would be rejected?

that the terror attacks each time, occured after israeli military advances, yet they cannot see that a people who 'blow themselves up' are fighting tanks, air strikes, armed troops with 7mill USD funding a day!

[daenumen]

@daenumen if you want to learn about all of this you can, look up the history, but you cannot trust opinions, as they are always biased. events are the only solid things, when they are admitted.

you realise america is now no longer obliged to release enemy kill counts? as though they were giving true data before. they carpet bombed afghanistan, and displaced more people than slobodan milosevic (after the US bombing of public utilities)

[daenumen]

@daenumen that more people have been displaced from palestine than in the holocaust.

that typhus killed people from western europe to iran, it was a huge pandemic, millions and millions of people died.

that if you can do maths, a population 1905 ~10mil - 11mil = -1 mil, today, 13+ mil

[daenumen]

@daenumen that genetic tests on people from many of the mass graves reveal the ashkenazi jews to be very closely related to germans, ie. either it was a civil war (the germans wanted control of their economy, a similar thing happened to the russians- economic collapse unless they obeyed), or they were german soldiers, who had their ID tags stolen from the graves (now officially determined as happening), german/russian death toll was HUGE. divide and conquer? let your enemies kill each other?

[daenumen]

@daenumen do you realise both world wars were for the sake of the zionists? that WWI and II are the same war? the war that WILL end all wars, once the zionists are so far in power, that the rest of the world are dying or dead.

that they are the ones who have sort for thousands of years blood purity? that they disregard the lost israelite tribes because they are consider "no longer pure enough"?

[daenumen]

@daenumen that this racial theory is evident in their genetic diseases? and despite the archeological evidence, cannot come to accept that the bible which bares no dates in it, and the small highland settlements found that comprised judea, found with no pig bones in the remains were all that they had in palestine? it was so small alexander the great didnt even bother when he conquered all of palestine? no government does what you want, but iran is truthful, and acts for iran.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz his son would be put into power as a puppet, his father, well, he trusted the west too much. afterall, look at the iranian youth, they are becoming 'grebbos', thanks to 'western culture', or rather an absence and gouging of the rich iranian culture, with hair gel and jewelry to fill the gaps.

iran is the biggest resistance to the expansion of the zionist nation. remember, it would have bordered iran by the 1980's had they been sucessful.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen glad you admitt that the shah trusted the west too much because we betrayed him. if we would have more balls the shah could have crushed the islamic revolution. i think but i'm no expert that iranian youth with "hair gel and jewlery" is just an act of defiance against their government. i don't blame them. hey, if i lived there i would do the same damned thing! but i do think its a shame that they are growing "abscent of the rich iranian culture" as you call it.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@laylafrackiewicz iran has the most amazing ancient culture, art and history! that's why i'm going there to see for myself this year.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz should you succeed in your ignorant intentions, intentions that the shah opposed though began to loose control over due to westernisational influences that consume dilute and decapitate the native cultures and people. look at history if you do not believe me. this is even happening in england since the british shook hands with the zionists.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz we did not betray the shah, this was as he wished, he would rather be in exile, than see iran fall into the hands of the zionists.

i am sorry to here you support and would actively engage in the infiltration of "western pseudo culture" into iran. you betray iran doing so. for sake of "fashion-consumerism" you are the hand of zionism reaching into irans heart.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz the west is pro-zionist. period. the shah was anti zionist. the zionists want iran gone, or under their control for the expansion of their occupied territories from egypt to irans borders (ie majority of world resources, thus enslaving the world).

the shah's son would be a puppet if he were put into power, his father, the shah, was put under increasing pressure, and the mistakes of trusting them.

[laylafrackiewicz]

@daenumen i once saw a video on youtube of shah and mike wallace, of the shah speaking of zionism. so i now what you say is partialy true. but also iran was one of the first midle easter countries to give diplomatical recognisition to israel.

[daenumen]

@laylafrackiewicz unfortunately due to the pahlavis closing ties with western governments, which eventually ousted him, were due to zionist influences in those countries. it is like the PLO- they were forced to accept the existance of israel and their occupation of palestine, otherwise they were to be 'extruded' as terrorists, hence in order to survive, they now must fight for the rights of what they saught to end.

[sandelf]

@Persiian1: one loved Iran the others hate Iran and u say they're the same, shame on u

[ZEITGEISTism]

What an embarrassment Barbra walters is ! WOW talk about a sell out! She is clearly demonstrating that she is NOT a real journalist ! Just.. (yawn) Yet another Typical propagandist She has the nerve to say "with all due respect" lol !

WHAT respect you bitch?

[CryingTruth]

Iran for long genegrations has rejected Islam in its pure form, she always tends to distort it in a way which suits her pre-Islamic teachings, case in point, Shiasm, and its going to turn us into slaves who's lives are dedicated to a mere human.

Secularism is never the answer, neither for Iran or Turkey, a Sharia religious law in a pure form without distortion will drive the country superior, but then again, Iran wasn't made to be motivated by pure religion, IT WAS MADE TO DESTORY IT.

[CryingTruth]

The Mahammeden world should keep an eye on Iran, she's a trouble maker, not in the west's case or anythng, but in the case of the Mahammeden Middle East.

The whole controversy is about pure Mahammeden law and Shiasm, not Mahammeden law vs secularism.

The Mahammeden religious law isn't just a script given 1400 years ago, because while it has principles which do not change, it also has legislation which do change, develop and grow as time moves on and concepts change.

[CryingTruth]

Anyway, no political revolution is going to fix Iran's main problem, Shiasm, what we need is a social uprising, an uprising navigated by the people not by political communities, Shiasm must dissapear, for it only set its foot on Iran by extreeme force and opression under the regime of Shah Ismail.

Remember Iranians, we are after all Mahammedens, lets just be ourselves.

[CryingTruth]

We Iranians would never understand, and you know why? Its because we are being treated like slaves under the current regime , worshiping Ali and Hussein through maniac Ayah's like Khomeini and Khaminai, to us, this is how Sharia law is presented, and owing to this fact do we hate Shria law.

No wonder why a secular Ira is allot more better then a religously motivated one, its because religion in Iran is Shiasm not Islam, in fact, the principles of Islam reject Shiams in an bsolute manner.

[honeysweetkiss1]

EVERY ONE WHOO SPEAKS BAD ABOUT OUR SHAAH AND HIS FAMILY ---> SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!! YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHIIING!!!!!! I HATE PEOPLES WHO SPEAK ABOUT A THINK BUT THEY DONT KNOOOW ANYTHIIING!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(excuse my english )

26.10.1919-27.07.1980 †

PEDAR DOOSET DARIM!!!!!!!!!

[laylafrackiewicz]

in case you didn't notice, i'm pro-pahlavi, so you're opinion is not welcome here.

at least not with the words you are using!

[donovanbailey96]

fuck you barbra walters! why don't u want to kiss the king of England's ass yourself- stupid hypocrite. Yet you entertain the thought of a monarchist in Iran?!

[aidiero]

kings!? dont that happen in fairy tales??

[o0tinerz0o]

stupid jew barbara walters!

[99999999988888888]

Reza Pahlavi has no balls. A disgrace to his grandfather.

[KhomeinisGhost]

Just tell us what to do your majesty

Hail to the king of kings

Death to the mullahs

[Diznab90]

he is very smart man

[Anthropology3000]

@KhomeinisGhost Death to the Shahs, Kings, Cesars, and despots of every kind. And mullahs too. Long live the communist egalitarian society. It will come back. Just wait, my friend, just wait. 

[shitonMOHAMMAD]

@Anthropology3000

i piss and shit in the mouth of your whore mother and your entire progeny you communist piece of shit. Fuck communism and that faggot Karl Marx, you fucking retard. Egalitarian? Pol Pot, Ho Chi Mihnn, Stlain, Mao Tse Tung, Castro, Ceaucescu, Honnecker...egalitarian? FUCK You communist son of a worthless whore

[sunbul2]

@shitonMOHAMMAD every inch the persian royalist.. well.. if you call it royalty.. i call it tinpot dictator.. what do you think?

[shitonMOHAMMAD]

@sunbul2

I am not a royalist

[brettishfan]

@shitonMOHAMMAD Then why are you watching this?

[machohead16]

The so called Green revolution is simply going to turn Red if the minority does not respect the will of majority. This is a universal rule. But the problem is some of those loser participants in the contract of $400 mil working to get their share. Of course there are some simple and naive followers who become the victims.

[machohead16]

The Anglo-Zionist sponsored so-called "green revolution" is nothing but a dream. I support Ahmedinejad.

[kataboa]

AHAHAHAHAH. 1st wtf is the green revolution, stop talking fucking bullshit, mousavi is pro islamic republic so there is no fucking revolution. And Fuck you with your support to ahmadinejad. With this you show that you have no knowledge about iran whatsoever. So go and hate israel and do your daily bullshit and don't give your opinion on iran cocksucker.

[sabinal01]

I Think that he is Iranian version of Obama, and I think that he would bring a good change in Iran,

I hope with everything that is going on that he will be able to return to the peacock throne

[Aryamehrbozorg]

long live pahlavi dynasty we persians dont want this islamic regime terrorist goverment in iran we dont want no mullahs in iran we want freedom and democracy we want monarchy in iran again we want our king cyrus reza pahlavi back to iran as our king

[machohead16]

We Iranians don't want an Islamic Republic? Iran is an Islamic country with an overwhelmingly Muslim majority, you will never change it. But what you can do is ponder the imponderable, hope and become hopeless, and recant the uneventful.

No more turning my country into a lapdog to hostile countries.The Shah was a puppet, and this son of his will never sport the crown. Hasn't someone told you that their dynasty was over. He is forgotten and never will be forgiven.

Long live the Revolution!

[99999999988888888]

Just because the people are Muslim does not mean we must become have theocratic dictators implementing the stupid laws of Sharia. The vast majority of Americans and Europeans are Christian; where are the theocratic American and European countries? Secularism is the answer. The idea of following the exact words of a book written 1400 years ago and ironically spread by an illiterate Arab is just mind-boggling. Stupidity and paranoia are the only reasons a theocratic government can take control.

[brayankharazi]

we support you

iran

[Minuvash]

جشن های شاهنشاهی ایران 2568 کورش بزرگ

را با کشتی های آسمانی هلیومی ، برقی و بادی انگلیسی

برای بازگشت شما خانواده نیکنام و سرافراز به ایران

برگزار نمائیم

[baluchistan]

shut up you fukkkkkin moran. big nose monkey

[KavaAhangar]

What has the size of his nose to do with what he has said?  And what has he said to upset you? You dont want democracy and seeing people to vote? With this kind of reasoning, I think its you who is the "moran".

[shahvishtasp]

we support you

children of cyrus movement

[shahvishtasp]

javid shah

zendeh bad kurosh r. pahlavi

[laylafrackiewicz]

i will not tolerate anyone insulting me on my own video's!

[mafiahamid]

HaHA so if i say long live Shah, will it also insult you?

[mafiahamid]

HaHa Reza shah is a slave of USA

[laylafrackiewicz]

hmm sound to me like you have very little to say because your comments are allways so short. There hasn't been a day that H.I.M Reza Pahlavi didn't think about the Iranian people! That's his sole purpose in live!

[KavaAhangar]

Great video. I liked the way Reza introduced himself as a new leader & admitting that his dad make some mistakes and that himself had a new vision. I like this transparency and I think we need that. One reason why probably not everyone believes in Reza yet, is because the monarchist media censors the truth about the mistakes of the past. For the first time I see that stupid remark of Shah that no one insults the King. It is better to close the past by being honest and being transparent 4 future

[ruuuz]

We love you so much Reza Pahlavi....

You are The One we can be proud of because your aim is to achieve a secular goverment which works for the interests of Iranian people and global peace.

PERSIENS let's realise this sweet dream together.

[Atusamihan]

Javid Reza Shah ||

Payandeh v Azaad Baad Iran v Irani

God Bless King Cyrus Reza Pahlavi

Great Speech,Many Thanks!!!!

[Pasargadae500BC]

Thanks for your effort, nice video :-D

[saeedo2000]

javid shah

payandeh iran e shahanshahi

javid shah