Howard Stern IQ test Wrap Up Show, Sal Governale vs Sam Simon

[joecugo]

If that there score theyre grading their own tests

[couchwanker]

i dont lol at the simpsons ,cheers or that other bull shit that guy worked on, sal is funny as fuck!

[mistax2k]

wow, sal delivered it to sam.

[mjccmc82]

102 is average

[vladster7272]

fuck the sam and the simpsons that should was only good for 9 seasons.

[CQ1981331]

@vladster7272 only 9 seasons?most shows dont even last on the air half that

[vladster7272]

@CQ1981331 I'll give simon and matt that the simpson have gone this far and congrats to them. That said the show and writing just don't seem as funny, but thats kinda like all shows, it's lost its steam. Plus simon has a whole staff to write things sal just has his life partner richard :P

[styles8888]

@vladster7272 only huh

[vladster7272]

@styles8888 Come on even you gotta admit the older episodes were the best :)

[Mistermax30]

How did this guy know the iq levels of the people he worked with...

[truriot]

its the truth sal is fucked when its over. most of sals bits are lame and gay

[einsteinslies]

That Sam is a pompous hebe, but Sal is moronic.

[penguinworm]

Who are all of these stupid fucking people that don't understand that 100 is average intelligence, and that it's not a setback to be average intelligence.

[codylawrence100]

the thing is, sal really comes across as an imbecile basically all of the time.

[penguinworm]

@codylawrence100  True.

[spockmcqueen]

The major criticism with IQ tests, is that it is not a complete measure of a persons intelligence. There are several different types of intelligence, social, musical, physcial, creative that your standard IQ test does not test for. These types of intelligence are hard to measure, so the standard IQ test does not include them. I would argue that Sals creative intelligence score would much higher than BaBa Booeys

[HGeneAnthony]

@spockmcqueen, your points are valid however one thing I'd like to point out is that standard iq tests traditionally, but not always, have questions based on learned knowledge. This is also BS because people focus their time and energy into other fields that aren't tested. A better form of an IQ test would limit the test to problem solving abilities like the mensa test supposedly does.

[ritter89]

@HGeneAnthony Properly designed intelligence tests are free of cultural and educational bias (like learned information). The WAIS, (most popular test in the US), devotes only a small section to general knowledge. Point values for that section are so minimal that they rarely effect overall performance scores. The Raven's Matrices (measures abstract reasoning) doesn't even require reading and writing skills. U might be thinking of online tests--most of which are poorly designed and bogus 

[ritter89]

@spockmcqueen Professionally administered and standardized intelligence tests are only measuring raw intelligence. Nobody has ever claimed they measure something else (like music appreciation, sense of humor, etc). However, raw intelligence does correlate with abilities that are valued in most developed cultures like the US (problem solving, logical reasoning, visual-spatial skills, etc).. I don't understand why people criticize IQ tests for things that the tests never claim to measure