I was at Al Asad for both of my deployments because I was in the airwing and if this guy was there he probably wasn't infantry, if I had to guess security forces FAP, if he was CI he wouldn't be doing this interview, and Al Asad WAS R&R for a lot of Infantry based Marine's that I spoke with when they came through there. From the prospective of being on that base it felt like no combat was happening but it was.
Those two conspiracy theorists are nuts. There has not been any proof whatsoever of a planned demolition at the WTC. Conspiracy theory websites and creative imaginations are NOT proof. It has been nine years since the 9/11 attacks and not one person brought forth legitimate proof of a planned demolition. Thoughts and opinions mean nothing- you need factual proof that there was a supposed "planned demolition". Why isn't the proof out there if you 'know' of it? Why is it still waiting? Bullshit!
Actually there HAS been proof, beyond reasonable doubt. Have you looked for it or read the NIST's report? No! Scientists from all over the globe have analyzed the pulverized concrete debris and found thermate residue. Hundreds of witnesses heard explosions in the basement levels of all 3 buildings. WTC7 had fire on a few floors and implodes w/out structural damage just like the towers. It's not from fire! The steel built Windsor burned for 23 hours and didn't collapse. Nice try!
@brown55061 Let me quote from the NIST WTC7 report; "The extensive three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation found that the fires on multiple floors in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event. Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down"
@brown55061 Is that your "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"?
As someone who works in the history field, let me be the one to tell you one thing and another very important thing: 1. If a conspiracy is proven, everybody knows about it that same day it's been proven. 2. WHEN PEOPLE WANT TO BELIEVE, THEY STOP THINKING. That's what you're doing right now. Number two is a very important tool that us, people in the history field of study and work, know very, very well, and work with over and over again.
I resent the fact that you think I want to believe in a conspiracy just to prove I'm right. I've done 1000+ hours of research. You sir are a jackhole. Being a history genius, tell us why the gulf of tonkin lies went unnoticed for 40 years after being admitted and leading to war! We went into Iraq under false pretenses too yet people aren't exposing this. Considering all those negligent on 911 were PROMOTED, we will never the truth w/out a public scientific investigation.
@brown55061 Stay on topic. We are not talking about Iraq or Vietnam. You were wrong and that's where it ends. It doesn't need to go on and on. The smart thing to do on your part would have been not to respond to my original response at all. Now you're all over the place and you're not making sense.
You are one smug piece. You made gross accusations about my character and history of conspiracy. We've proven your history is dead wrong concerning 'conspiracy' and your assumptions about me are off. I defended myself clearly and concisely answering your last claims.
For the record, I can copy & paste from NIST too, but that hardly makes it fact. Their faulty models were wrong and those who exposed it were fired immediately. You are not helping your cause. Leave me in peace!
@brown55061 Wait- weren't you the one who asked me if I read the NIST report in the first place? So you first said the report supported your nut ideas, and now you're saying they're hurting your case. So you're basically contradicting yourself and are now helping my case. You're cutting your own throat.
Also, how do you know the people who wrote the report were fired? Did you know them individually? No. Of course you want to be left alone- you've come to a dead end. You've proven yourself dumb.
I asked if you read the NIST report, knowing it was an impossible flop. I've read it so I know it contradicts physics. I just wanted to see how quick you would Google the NIST's report and copy & paste some tripe here pretending you've investigated it.
I don't want to be left alone, I just don't like arguing online jackhole. The good news is the molten metal and thermate don't lie, only jackholes like you and NIST do. You have not investigated anything so I'm done with you.
NUMEROUS high level foreign policy officials stated in writing in 2000 and before that they NEEDED a BLOODBATH on American soil. My count is around 2 dozen.
Besides PNAC, several books were published advocating the NEED for such a bloodbath, incl Grand Chessboard.
9-11 was fairly explicitly, a foreign policy and domestic policy GOAL. Yes, GOAL. Shock and Awe. It worked great.
On my page, Ron Paul quotes one example, even tho Congressman says it is not proof of a conspiracy.
Apparently you are unaware of how many former military personal abuse substances to get them through the day to combat their anxiety and ppd. Who says this guy is messed up on drugs anyway? How many wars have you been in? That's what I thought!
@brown55061 since iraq ive failed 2 field sobriety tests completely sober. one of the times my first sargeant showed up and tweaked on the mp's about how many times ive been blow up and of course i dont have good balance. I cant remeber things the way i used to be able to either. i dont use drugs alot. but i also cant sleep most nights mabye 2 hours every other day
That marine is thinking how the fuck can I kill these guys.
polishpio0neer1 7 months ago
Conspiracy Theorists ..
MissBreBerry 10 months ago
I was at Al Asad for both of my deployments because I was in the airwing and if this guy was there he probably wasn't infantry, if I had to guess security forces FAP, if he was CI he wouldn't be doing this interview, and Al Asad WAS R&R for a lot of Infantry based Marine's that I spoke with when they came through there. From the prospective of being on that base it felt like no combat was happening but it was.
TheGldnSldr 1 year ago
Those two conspiracy theorists are nuts. There has not been any proof whatsoever of a planned demolition at the WTC. Conspiracy theory websites and creative imaginations are NOT proof. It has been nine years since the 9/11 attacks and not one person brought forth legitimate proof of a planned demolition. Thoughts and opinions mean nothing- you need factual proof that there was a supposed "planned demolition". Why isn't the proof out there if you 'know' of it? Why is it still waiting? Bullshit!
dror91 1 year ago
@dror91
Actually there HAS been proof, beyond reasonable doubt. Have you looked for it or read the NIST's report? No! Scientists from all over the globe have analyzed the pulverized concrete debris and found thermate residue. Hundreds of witnesses heard explosions in the basement levels of all 3 buildings. WTC7 had fire on a few floors and implodes w/out structural damage just like the towers. It's not from fire! The steel built Windsor burned for 23 hours and didn't collapse. Nice try!
brown55061 1 year ago
@brown55061 Let me quote from the NIST WTC7 report; "The extensive three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation found that the fires on multiple floors in WTC 7, which were uncontrolled but otherwise similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event. Heating of floor beams and girders caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down"
dror91 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@brown55061 you can read it yourself at :nist.gov/el/wtc7final_112508.cfm
dror91 1 year ago
@brown55061 Is that your "proof beyond a reasonable doubt"?
As someone who works in the history field, let me be the one to tell you one thing and another very important thing: 1. If a conspiracy is proven, everybody knows about it that same day it's been proven. 2. WHEN PEOPLE WANT TO BELIEVE, THEY STOP THINKING. That's what you're doing right now. Number two is a very important tool that us, people in the history field of study and work, know very, very well, and work with over and over again.
dror91 1 year ago
@dror91
I resent the fact that you think I want to believe in a conspiracy just to prove I'm right. I've done 1000+ hours of research. You sir are a jackhole. Being a history genius, tell us why the gulf of tonkin lies went unnoticed for 40 years after being admitted and leading to war! We went into Iraq under false pretenses too yet people aren't exposing this. Considering all those negligent on 911 were PROMOTED, we will never the truth w/out a public scientific investigation.
brown55061 1 year ago
@brown55061 Stay on topic. We are not talking about Iraq or Vietnam. You were wrong and that's where it ends. It doesn't need to go on and on. The smart thing to do on your part would have been not to respond to my original response at all. Now you're all over the place and you're not making sense.
dror91 1 year ago
You are one smug piece. You made gross accusations about my character and history of conspiracy. We've proven your history is dead wrong concerning 'conspiracy' and your assumptions about me are off. I defended myself clearly and concisely answering your last claims.
For the record, I can copy & paste from NIST too, but that hardly makes it fact. Their faulty models were wrong and those who exposed it were fired immediately. You are not helping your cause. Leave me in peace!
brown55061 1 year ago
@brown55061 Wait- weren't you the one who asked me if I read the NIST report in the first place? So you first said the report supported your nut ideas, and now you're saying they're hurting your case. So you're basically contradicting yourself and are now helping my case. You're cutting your own throat.
Also, how do you know the people who wrote the report were fired? Did you know them individually? No. Of course you want to be left alone- you've come to a dead end. You've proven yourself dumb.
dror91 1 year ago
@dror91
I asked if you read the NIST report, knowing it was an impossible flop. I've read it so I know it contradicts physics. I just wanted to see how quick you would Google the NIST's report and copy & paste some tripe here pretending you've investigated it.
I don't want to be left alone, I just don't like arguing online jackhole. The good news is the molten metal and thermate don't lie, only jackholes like you and NIST do. You have not investigated anything so I'm done with you.
brown55061 1 year ago
@brown55061 Of course
dror91 1 year ago
this guy is a former marine POG, thats how it is for the airwingers/POG's in the marine corps
oneofthefew52090 1 year ago
Then Who the hell can tell me how the planes got there if this shit was all planed.
USMCMarineForceRecon 1 year ago
is this in cleveland
Irm6001 2 years ago
who is this guy what is his name
Irm6001 2 years ago
Is that really a Marine?
MrPaulieskoalz 2 years ago
NUMEROUS high level foreign policy officials stated in writing in 2000 and before that they NEEDED a BLOODBATH on American soil. My count is around 2 dozen.
Besides PNAC, several books were published advocating the NEED for such a bloodbath, incl Grand Chessboard.
9-11 was fairly explicitly, a foreign policy and domestic policy GOAL. Yes, GOAL. Shock and Awe. It worked great.
On my page, Ron Paul quotes one example, even tho Congressman says it is not proof of a conspiracy.
dilbertgeg 2 years ago 4
we ARE change!
maryannesbuds 2 years ago
this is some scary stuff. favorited.
wachman 2 years ago
Mushrooms for the masses. well done lads, geat job!!!!
61shirley 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's not right to show a marine all messed up on drugs!!!!!!!!!! I would like this video removed it's not fair to this poor guy nor our country.
naturalrootlawn 2 years ago
I agree 100%!
xesiria 2 years ago
Apparently you are unaware of how many former military personal abuse substances to get them through the day to combat their anxiety and ppd. Who says this guy is messed up on drugs anyway? How many wars have you been in? That's what I thought!
brown55061 2 years ago 8
@brown55061 since iraq ive failed 2 field sobriety tests completely sober. one of the times my first sargeant showed up and tweaked on the mp's about how many times ive been blow up and of course i dont have good balance. I cant remeber things the way i used to be able to either. i dont use drugs alot. but i also cant sleep most nights mabye 2 hours every other day
insulatedmemory 1 year ago
I would like you removed!!!!
cdimmm 2 years ago
why?
lenndogg 2 years ago
that is fucked up,
1pigslayer 2 years ago 2