it's called virtualization technology, it's where you combine a network of computers and configure them to access the same programs and also utilize the systems RAM, processors, hdds etc through a linuix server. Here's some simple math for you idiots: Each quad core has 4 cores. Hence the name quad. So you would take 4 (#of cores) x2.66 (2.66ghz from ea core)=10.64. Then you would take 10.64x5 (number of systems) which equals 53.2. Simple math.
@Ptro001 It's amazing what people don't know and yet are still able to do with that lack of knowledge isn't it? He should have added the F.L.O.P.S. instead of the GHz.... Some people don't realize the difference between power and speed... It's like Torque vs. HP, They're closely related but not the same damn thing.
Theoretically it is 53Ghz worth of clockcycles, but in practice processors never scale 100% so you will not get anywhere near 53 ghz worth of computingpower...
@LiquidNitrogen2010 I don't care what you use to cool that trinity box, you're not going to eclipse a 20 core machine with 6 cores. Gulftown is good, but it isn't that good. Not to mention those systems are INSANELY overpriced. $8,000?! Seriously, some custom builders are so fucking pretentious in their pricing. I can build that same machine for nowhere NEAR 8g's! I guess it's OK for rich people who don't know how to build a machine, but not anyone else.
and my computer is still more powerful....just because theres 5 systems does mean you hav 5x the power, ESPECIALLY because your running windows, i suggest using freebsd and making a cluster, THEN you have some fucking serious power.
the most you can do with this setup is type on word..... maybe runescape... on low.... hmmm 10 fps sooo good. i love to see you put 5 6890s in there and see how hot it gets in the case........ nvm you cant even put them in the slot on the boards. no pci express
you can run all 5 boards as one system using linux. One board as control and the other boards running as noads to share the workload.
It the same way they make super computers. Hard disk and network speeds could be a bottle neck. You'd want to use SSD drives and have room for a high grade graphics card on the master board, other 4 would just use the cpu and ram ssd drives.
good idea for a work office terminals. Don't really need quad cores for office terminals :)
@Wabbit0789 hey wabbit, I have been trying to do this, but all I have found on clustering is to run one individual program that has been made to run on clustering, not an overall boost in performance. So if you have any information on what you mentioned, several systems working together as one single unit, and that could boost performance in such a way that not only one specified program runs using the cluster, please contact me.
The naming of the vid is off yes, but regardless this is an impressive build. Not sure how useful it is, other than saving space... but still impressive.
@MrTpengineer Each quad core has 4 cores. Hence the name quad. So you would take 4x2.66=10.64. Then you would take 10.64x5 which equals 53.2. Simple math.
I agree with @MISTERAMD, THIS IS RETARDED, AND ONE OF THE FUNNIEST VIDEOS I'VE EVER SEEN ABOUT COMPUTERS AHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! HOW STUPID!!!!!!!!
Oh yea, my system runs on AIR which is SAFER, what happens to the 5 "systems" in "one gigantic case" if system one water block cracks and leaks onto the other FOUR SYSTEMS BELOW, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LLLLLOOOOOOLLLLLZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!! LASTLY, THIS 5 in one system HAD TO COST MORE THAN MY 980X, HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW STUPID! The 5 monitors combined with 1000 watts must eat up quite a hefty amount of electric!!!!!!!!!!!!
What wasteful outdated system, my SINGLE Core 980X overclocked to 5.0 GHZ does what those FIVE systems do in one SYSTEM! Furthermore I only consume 700 watts to do it!!! HAHA Plus I don't have to turn on my computer FIVE TIMES TO GET IT RUNNING LOLZ!!! My temps are a little higher though, however, this is pretty dumb when you can get similar performance out of a mid-tower that's easier to carry, seriously though I HAVE TURN IT ON FIVE TIMES???
Regardless if the CPU's work together or not, it's still a combined total of 53.2 GHz in one case.
Like Canadiancanable said. Compare it to a garage. In this situation each car has four 266 horsepower engines combined and working together. (Kinda like the Bugatti Veyron which actually has two engines combined rather than a single 16 cylinder engine)
And you have 5 of those cars in your garage, you end up with a total capacity of 5320 horsepower worth of engine.
Okay to end the BS lies and the ridiculous comments.... First off when you clock a quad core CPU the GHz is per core meaning if you have a quad core overclocked at 4.0GHz that is per core not total output power so for you ppl saying 2.66GHz is overall output power get a clue that's why Intel says PER CORE DUH! Now this thing is not 53GHz because none of the CPUs are working together as ONE system hence it is just five computers inside one case that can't even cross communicate with each other.
Thats a lie. I know Aps which wouldnt work faster on your PC than on 1 CPU which has the same speed in ghz, since some programs really only work good on FAST PCs. You got a really "big" PC, lets say you got like 20 times more transistors than I got and i got the same speed per core, that doesnt mean that programs run 20 times faster on yours.
@wuselpuff yes but the title says 53 ghz in one pc ***CASE*** in other terms 1 ferrari = 500 horsepower now put 3 of those into a garage, you can now rightful say my garage contains a total of 1500 horsepower.
What is that little thing with the 5 buttons that lets you boot the 5 systems, I'd like to come up with something with buttons like that but one system, like some sort of cool kiddy idea
The world's fastest CPU is a silicon-germanium based CPU made by IBM that can run at about 350GHZ at room temperature and 500GHZ when cooled by liquid nitrogen.
yeah okay. but this is far away from anything useful. for scientific research it is something. but the really fastest cpu in clock speed is the Power 6 CPU with 4.7 Ghz Stock. The fastest Overcloxked one was an Intel Celeron D clocked at over 8 Ghz.
how in the hell do you figure your running 53ghz?? the worlds fastest cpu was clocked at like 7ghz even if you had 5 of those, which you dont, especially sense your not running dry ice, or even water for that matter.
Questions: How they'd derived to 53GHz??? Isn't it to by 5 CPUs X 2.66GHz = 13.3GHz? Or, definately RAM speeds at 1066MHz x 5 = 53GHz. Not till I saw those RAM slots were empty makes me wonder.
I'm no expert on hardware, software's more my thing... can someone explain the processing power of a multiple core processor? does it work as (in this example) 4 cores with a processing power 1/4 of 2.66GHz each, TOTALLING 2.66GHz?
I used to be under the impression that it was 4 sets of 2.66GHz
@andrewk1979 Learn More about computers before you try to be smart its 5 Quad Cores/quad core means the computer operates like it was 4, and with 5 of those things in there he can push out 53Ghz...It might cost an Arm and a Leg but its not Impossible
@Dafidd actually, for 3d rendering, it would be nice. xeons and core series arent THAT different. this can still render images quite quickly, HOWEVER, ur beter off with ONE overclocked core i7 980x...for 3d rendering, 12x4.5ghz shud beat 5x4x2.66, giving that u will still have money to get a decent watercooling system for the cpu...in this build, i doubt u can overclock the q6700 too much cause of lack of ventilation.
thatsmjust for show this system isnt working like a cluster its just a showcase about cooling only if you want a powerfull system in one case put a asus workstation place nvdia tesla cuda intel i7 core and velociraptor hdd's in raid 0 way better and smoke this one at the blank of an eye xD obviosly that cant be working 53,2 GHZ or you mean 2,66 x 20 times faster thats a whole bullshit :D
@jeanforthewin you are correct sir. to add more to your point. GHz is how fast the cores react. there reaction speed. a quad core at 2.66 will react slower than a dual core at 3.00 the reason people still chose quadcores, is because they catch up very quicky, the lower Ghz reacts much slower, but there are double the ammount of cores, so basically in that case the quad core would over take the sual straight away.
@jeanforthewin hey im confused as well but my bro finished uni and just before he did he made me a pc and it has intel cor i7 920 @ 2.67GHZ, he says its 2.67GHZ per core so i would have 10.68GHZ ! thats wat he says.....
@askloglog no it just means I can run 8 threads. but here is what is confusing then. So my cpu is 2.93 divided into 4 cores and then hyperthreading makes each of those cores virtually divided in 2. and then turbo boost overclocks cores when others arent running.
@piet10113 ffs, i can't believe how many people don't get this. to calculate your cpu speed you take the front side bus x multiplier x number of cores. for intel cpus like this one the multiplier is usually 9 so for example for 2.4 ghz (a standard Q6600) it would be 666x9x4=>2.4ghz. not 9.6 or something stupid
@jeanforthewin Don't you know how this works? You don't actually have to know anything to be an "internet expert". All you need is some vague knowlege of how to put letters together to form what could pass as words, as well as the ability to shit on your keyboard and call it knowledge.
@jeanforthewin - Sounds like you got sold a single core CPU masked as a quad core. A CPU is measured by physical cores, so if you have a 2.66GHz quad core then YES that means it is 2.66GHz x 4 because there are actually four physical processing cores clocked at 2.66GHz each. I'm not sure where you got your information from but it is seriously outdated and incorrect.
@jeanforthewin - Sounds like you got sold a single core CPU masked as a quad core. A CPU is measured by physical cores, so if you have a 2.66GHz quad core then YES that means it is 2.66GHz x 4 because there are actually four physical processing cores clocked at 2.66GHz each. I'm not sure where you got your information from but it is seriously outdated and incorrect.
@jeanforthewin actually that depends on the running environment. If your running this as a vmware server It counts each cpu's clock cycles and adds them together giving you a total ghz rating and how much is left after you start loading it up no there is not one cpu running at 53ghz but in a virtualization standpoint you have 53ghz worth of clock cycles.
Yeah, One PC with 20x 2,66 GHz (NOT with 53GHz). But impressive with that PSU. How did you manage using one PSU and starting each system separately? What parts did you use for that? Cause i wanna buld a sys like that too.
@TheLittleWorldofGaz more cores to less frequency is generally better then less cores to more freqency, having a total of 10 or so Ghz is alot better then having only 6Ghz
they did 2.66ghz and multiplied it by the number of cores (like many noobs do, although if they can do this theyre obviously no a noob...) and then multiplied it by the number of cpus
Thats like 5 separate pcs, right? Why putting it together then? The processing power is not a sum of all 5 pcs when you are using one terminal, am i right? If im right, then thats one lousy pc, and if im wrong, than congratulations.
i also can't imagine it'd be very heat efficient if all 5 were under heavy load from gaming. or heck, even if 1 of those was under heavy load from gaming. not much space or room for air flow in that crowded case.
what exactly is the point of it unless you have a household with several people wanting to use a computer at once. and even then it's not to worthwhile.
@monkfurts
math nazi reportin' for duty
4*2.65 = 10.6
5*10.6 = 53
jarcyk111 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's called virtualization technology, it's where you combine a network of computers and configure them to access the same programs and also utilize the systems RAM, processors, hdds etc through a linuix server. Here's some simple math for you idiots: Each quad core has 4 cores. Hence the name quad. So you would take 4 (#of cores) x2.66 (2.66ghz from ea core)=10.64. Then you would take 10.64x5 (number of systems) which equals 53.2. Simple math.
CMCAshadowens 1 month ago
Comment removed
CMCAshadowens 1 month ago
5 2.66 Ghz processors does not mean 53 Ghz in total. Ghz is not an object, it is a measurement. You cannot say that you have 53 of it your case.
caial145 1 month ago 2
was that an unused gym in the back? i thought so.
DevilFromNorth 1 month ago
its not 53 ghz
you kant multiplay ghz
maby there are 5 systems with quad core and each of them hafe 2.65 ghz
but you cant make 5*4*2.65=52
monkfurts 1 month ago
What is your GC
faris5578 3 months ago
wow
bull3tbutler 3 months ago
you cant add up each CPU core at 2.66 GHz and call it 53 GHz, fact of the matter is, they ALL still run at 2.66 GHz per clock cycle,
Ptro001 5 months ago
@Ptro001 It's amazing what people don't know and yet are still able to do with that lack of knowledge isn't it? He should have added the F.L.O.P.S. instead of the GHz.... Some people don't realize the difference between power and speed... It's like Torque vs. HP, They're closely related but not the same damn thing.
y2k3100 4 months ago 7
@y2k3100 EXACTLY!!!!!
Ptro001 4 months ago
5,000$ in processors?
Use 30$ mainboards.
ganymedeIV4 6 months ago
this is impossible
move along people
ventHARAS 7 months ago
Theoretically it is 53Ghz worth of clockcycles, but in practice processors never scale 100% so you will not get anywhere near 53 ghz worth of computingpower...
pioneerz450 7 months ago
@pioneerz450 its not you cant put all those core's together
all core's get diffrent calculating task
wether its scaled or not you can not ever ever put clockcycles together
klote2314 6 months ago
Well the 5.27 GHz x 6 core i7-990X by Liquid Nitrogen Overclocking (dot com) would still crush that system.
LiquidNitrogen2010 7 months ago
@LiquidNitrogen2010 I don't care what you use to cool that trinity box, you're not going to eclipse a 20 core machine with 6 cores. Gulftown is good, but it isn't that good. Not to mention those systems are INSANELY overpriced. $8,000?! Seriously, some custom builders are so fucking pretentious in their pricing. I can build that same machine for nowhere NEAR 8g's! I guess it's OK for rich people who don't know how to build a machine, but not anyone else.
xilix 7 months ago
I would hate to see the electric bill..
DragonL33t 8 months ago
and my computer is still more powerful....just because theres 5 systems does mean you hav 5x the power, ESPECIALLY because your running windows, i suggest using freebsd and making a cluster, THEN you have some fucking serious power.
jamieplaysdrums 8 months ago
y so many um... y so many drives? lol.. OH.. the different systems! just realized that.
sciman001 8 months ago
interesting only if you harnest the power of beowulf....Moro's!
silverfearn 9 months ago
no ram in slots. you fail
Arjoonmoal 10 months ago
@jeanforthewin
Just to reiterate on that quote, you don't times the Giga-hertz by 4 but you divid it to find the Giga-hertz of one processor in the quad core.
zSIlentNinjaz 10 months ago
i know you put 5 motherboard with all quadcore 2.66ghz so mean 2.66ghz x5 in one case with 1000w psu i think the psu very tired
19atiq98 10 months ago
I'll wait 5 yrs and see one in my living room
sebastian869 10 months ago
the most you can do with this setup is type on word..... maybe runescape... on low.... hmmm 10 fps sooo good. i love to see you put 5 6890s in there and see how hot it gets in the case........ nvm you cant even put them in the slot on the boards. no pci express
u4eagun 11 months ago
you can run all 5 boards as one system using linux. One board as control and the other boards running as noads to share the workload.
It the same way they make super computers. Hard disk and network speeds could be a bottle neck. You'd want to use SSD drives and have room for a high grade graphics card on the master board, other 4 would just use the cpu and ram ssd drives.
good idea for a work office terminals. Don't really need quad cores for office terminals :)
Wabbit0789 11 months ago 23
@Wabbit0789 hey wabbit, I have been trying to do this, but all I have found on clustering is to run one individual program that has been made to run on clustering, not an overall boost in performance. So if you have any information on what you mentioned, several systems working together as one single unit, and that could boost performance in such a way that not only one specified program runs using the cluster, please contact me.
Thanks
macacoman 1 month ago
The naming of the vid is off yes, but regardless this is an impressive build. Not sure how useful it is, other than saving space... but still impressive.
UltraVert 1 year ago
you fucking tweaker
account0skeptic 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrTpengineer 1 year ago
@MrTpengineer Each quad core has 4 cores. Hence the name quad. So you would take 4x2.66=10.64. Then you would take 10.64x5 which equals 53.2. Simple math.
TH3GOD88 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrTpengineer 1 year ago
@MrTpengineer Noob...
05bowdenm 10 months ago
Comment removed
MrTpengineer 10 months ago
@MrTpengineer I could... but i dont want too.
05bowdenm 10 months ago
Comment removed
MrTpengineer 1 year ago
I agree with @MISTERAMD, THIS IS RETARDED, AND ONE OF THE FUNNIEST VIDEOS I'VE EVER SEEN ABOUT COMPUTERS AHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! HOW STUPID!!!!!!!!
robotica62 1 year ago
You should call yourself doodoomaster.....heehee
robotica62 1 year ago
Oh yea, my system runs on AIR which is SAFER, what happens to the 5 "systems" in "one gigantic case" if system one water block cracks and leaks onto the other FOUR SYSTEMS BELOW, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LLLLLOOOOOOLLLLLZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!! LASTLY, THIS 5 in one system HAD TO COST MORE THAN MY 980X, HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW STUPID! The 5 monitors combined with 1000 watts must eat up quite a hefty amount of electric!!!!!!!!!!!!
robotica62 1 year ago
What wasteful outdated system, my SINGLE Core 980X overclocked to 5.0 GHZ does what those FIVE systems do in one SYSTEM! Furthermore I only consume 700 watts to do it!!! HAHA Plus I don't have to turn on my computer FIVE TIMES TO GET IT RUNNING LOLZ!!! My temps are a little higher though, however, this is pretty dumb when you can get similar performance out of a mid-tower that's easier to carry, seriously though I HAVE TURN IT ON FIVE TIMES???
robotica62 1 year ago
13,3 GHz is the sys running!!! a q Core with 3.4 GHz has not 4x3,4, thats a mistake, lot people do!!!
Alka222222 1 year ago
1:36
DC --> DC converter?
@piet10113
go back to play cod4 ty
BrucieWayne 1 year ago
all you haters are real dumb asses... stop hating man , if u dont agree with , or like the vid dont watch it!!
piet10113 1 year ago
Regardless if the CPU's work together or not, it's still a combined total of 53.2 GHz in one case.
Like Canadiancanable said. Compare it to a garage. In this situation each car has four 266 horsepower engines combined and working together. (Kinda like the Bugatti Veyron which actually has two engines combined rather than a single 16 cylinder engine)
And you have 5 of those cars in your garage, you end up with a total capacity of 5320 horsepower worth of engine.
Not difficult to grasp right?
DaniWesNL 1 year ago
if you have 4 cores, at 2.66ghz that is 4 * 2.66ghz, one for every core.
savortech 1 year ago
13.3Ghz. . . .
Yeorgeypoo 1 year ago
Okay to end the BS lies and the ridiculous comments.... First off when you clock a quad core CPU the GHz is per core meaning if you have a quad core overclocked at 4.0GHz that is per core not total output power so for you ppl saying 2.66GHz is overall output power get a clue that's why Intel says PER CORE DUH! Now this thing is not 53GHz because none of the CPUs are working together as ONE system hence it is just five computers inside one case that can't even cross communicate with each other.
clabszero 1 year ago
if you network them then it is one 53ghz with a shit lot of core
but if all are on there one's then its 2.66ghz x 4
ps you should network them?
still cool
SuperAaron969 1 year ago
Thats a lie. I know Aps which wouldnt work faster on your PC than on 1 CPU which has the same speed in ghz, since some programs really only work good on FAST PCs. You got a really "big" PC, lets say you got like 20 times more transistors than I got and i got the same speed per core, that doesnt mean that programs run 20 times faster on yours.
xxBlackpspxx 1 year ago
1 ferrari drives 320 kph
3 ferraris drive 320 kph, still each doing 320 kph
1 cpu doing 3 ghz
3 cpu cores doing 3 ghz, still each doing 3 ghz
cannot be summed
wuselpuff 1 year ago 2
@wuselpuff yes but the title says 53 ghz in one pc ***CASE*** in other terms 1 ferrari = 500 horsepower now put 3 of those into a garage, you can now rightful say my garage contains a total of 1500 horsepower.
canadiancanable 1 year ago
But will it blend?
PSNdomgul58 1 year ago
What is that little thing with the 5 buttons that lets you boot the 5 systems, I'd like to come up with something with buttons like that but one system, like some sort of cool kiddy idea
DJdotMATRIX 1 year ago
The world's fastest CPU is a silicon-germanium based CPU made by IBM that can run at about 350GHZ at room temperature and 500GHZ when cooled by liquid nitrogen.
thefifthlord1 1 year ago
@thefifthlord1
oh shut the fuck up. don't tell bullshit. and even if this was true you have to show me...
Loosertroete 1 year ago
@Loosertroete
techspotdotcom/news/21961-ibm-produces-500ghz-silicongermanium-cpu.html
thefifthlord1 1 year ago
@thefifthlord1
yeah okay. but this is far away from anything useful. for scientific research it is something. but the really fastest cpu in clock speed is the Power 6 CPU with 4.7 Ghz Stock. The fastest Overcloxked one was an Intel Celeron D clocked at over 8 Ghz.
Loosertroete 1 year ago
@Loosertroete
Actually, the fastest one is the IBM z196 Processor.
thefifthlord1 1 year ago
@thefifthlord1
oh yeah forgot about that one.
Loosertroete 1 year ago
Comment removed
thefifthlord1 1 year ago
how in the hell do you figure your running 53ghz?? the worlds fastest cpu was clocked at like 7ghz even if you had 5 of those, which you dont, especially sense your not running dry ice, or even water for that matter.
askloglog 1 year ago
Questions: How they'd derived to 53GHz??? Isn't it to by 5 CPUs X 2.66GHz = 13.3GHz? Or, definately RAM speeds at 1066MHz x 5 = 53GHz. Not till I saw those RAM slots were empty makes me wonder.
geraldlkc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Questions: How they'd derived to 53GHz??? Isn't it 5 CPUs X 2.66GHz = 13.3GHz? Or, definately RAM speeds at 1066MHz each x 5 = 53GHz.
Misleading here though, and good enuf for us to crack our heads...lol. Not until the RAM slot were left empty makes me wonder.
geraldlkc 1 year ago
Comment removed
geraldlkc 1 year ago
so you have to switch you keyboard and mouse every time??
robinbob56 1 year ago
I'm no expert on hardware, software's more my thing... can someone explain the processing power of a multiple core processor? does it work as (in this example) 4 cores with a processing power 1/4 of 2.66GHz each, TOTALLING 2.66GHz?
I used to be under the impression that it was 4 sets of 2.66GHz
p3rs0n42 1 year ago
250 years from now ppl wll hav a good laff at dis
deteru 1 year ago
@deteru let's say 10 years, max 15 until this system is "low-end" :D
beckerdaniel89 1 year ago
Coolermaster made this mistake with 53GHz instead of 5x 2,66 GHz? OMG! So noobs! But maybe it's not the official channel of Coolermaster...
GamerAndReviewer 1 year ago
HA!
if it was 53GHz Per Core, your Pc would of blown in seconds
daplayer 1 year ago
It's not per core you noobs :(
Lagaaja 1 year ago
so you have 5 pcs in one each running at 2.66ghz. NOT 53GHz...Video Title FAIL!!!
andrewk1979 1 year ago
@andrewk1979 Learn More about computers before you try to be smart its 5 Quad Cores/quad core means the computer operates like it was 4, and with 5 of those things in there he can push out 53Ghz...It might cost an Arm and a Leg but its not Impossible
305G00NZ 1 year ago
must have been a pain to plug everything in :P
Rice2816 1 year ago
for this rig is need about 6600 watt power suplly not 1000 watt LOL
djlexist 1 year ago
Comment removed
nazurea 1 year ago
Where the hell do you guys get the money for this?!
reixo 1 year ago
I don't see the point of this it’s just a expensive inefficient rack system plus a rack looks way better
WatchmenDrManhattan 1 year ago
holy thats out runs my 12 core mac pro
Armaangandevia1 1 year ago
@Armaangandevia1 no cause ur mac pro is one computer... thats 5 computers in one case
xmodrock 1 year ago
@xmodrock i know
Armaangandevia1 1 year ago
shame it is really 5 different PCs running a 2.66GHz each not one system running at 53GHz
man some people are retards :/
pccomponetreviewer 1 year ago
you can't call 5 sets of 2.66ghz quad cores 53ghz. That's just a fact.
railfan844 1 year ago 59
@railfan844 he totals them up:P
ypoora1 11 months ago
What about running worldcommunitygrid projects on those cpu's ?
smoke489 1 year ago
Cool, but can it run Crysis ?
smoke489 1 year ago
this is really stupid.... it's five systems in one box... not sure why anyone would want this as a PC... i vote that this build is a FAIL!
WhiteTrashDna 1 year ago
BEST for watching PORN lol :P
lapulapu12345 1 year ago
Gotta love small Motherboards.
522viper 1 year ago
hardly practical. for gaming it's useless since the power comes from the GPU, for rendering too (your better off with xeon's) and a solid MB.
what i really dislike is the naming of the vid :-/
this is more like a tree based computer (logical) than a supercomputer (physical)
and 2.66GHz x 5? pfff! it's like saying that the total of intel's processors come to 1billion Hz's
Dafidd 1 year ago
@Dafidd actually, for 3d rendering, it would be nice. xeons and core series arent THAT different. this can still render images quite quickly, HOWEVER, ur beter off with ONE overclocked core i7 980x...for 3d rendering, 12x4.5ghz shud beat 5x4x2.66, giving that u will still have money to get a decent watercooling system for the cpu...in this build, i doubt u can overclock the q6700 too much cause of lack of ventilation.
driftingnfsc 1 year ago
Each cpu is clocked 2.66Ghz X4 even if you had five of them you couldn't class it as a 53Ghz PC...
uncommoncarp 1 year ago
i think 5 logical processors would result in x 5 the speed if use together so it should be 2.66ghz x5 cuz theres 5 main board and 5 processors
shermanlee85856 1 year ago
I want this
rysliv 1 year ago
2.5" drive are garbage
deluxedookie 1 year ago
why?
kadillacking 1 year ago
wow that would be nice for rendering like models or big movies with 100+ effects
KontererClean 1 year ago
this thing hasn´t 53GHZ!!!!!!!
just think about 2 cars driving with 50km/h... they wouldn´t be too fast because they drive 2x50km/h and not 100km/h
Messerschmitt262a2a 1 year ago
@Messerschmitt262a2a It's a case, containing 53Ghz
Duhhhh
BlueBajs 1 year ago
@BlueBajs you don´t understand me :-)
this case holds many "slow" cpus and not a 53ghz cpu
Messerschmitt262a2a 1 year ago
@Messerschmitt262a2a *facepalm*
Duuuuhhhhhhh!
BlueBajs 1 year ago
@BlueBajs what means facepalm?
+ i just say the truth xD
Messerschmitt262a2a 1 year ago
thatsmjust for show this system isnt working like a cluster its just a showcase about cooling only if you want a powerfull system in one case put a asus workstation place nvdia tesla cuda intel i7 core and velociraptor hdd's in raid 0 way better and smoke this one at the blank of an eye xD obviosly that cant be working 53,2 GHZ or you mean 2,66 x 20 times faster thats a whole bullshit :D
streetlevel84 1 year ago
retard
acer0169 1 year ago
5x2.66 is not 53 ghz?
you're not one of those people who thinks a quad core at 2.66 ghz means it has 4x2.66ghz right?
jeanforthewin 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin No offense but I just think the title is a little confusing to attract many videoviews. However (4x2,66Ghz) x 5 = 53,2 Ghz
MISTERAMD 1 year ago
@MISTERAMD that is NOT how cpus work!
a quad core running at 2.66 ghz is running at 2.66ghz, not 4x2.66
this is so retarded!
jeanforthewin 1 year ago 55
@jeanforthewin you are correct sir. to add more to your point. GHz is how fast the cores react. there reaction speed. a quad core at 2.66 will react slower than a dual core at 3.00 the reason people still chose quadcores, is because they catch up very quicky, the lower Ghz reacts much slower, but there are double the ammount of cores, so basically in that case the quad core would over take the sual straight away.
jeremya5 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin hey im confused as well but my bro finished uni and just before he did he made me a pc and it has intel cor i7 920 @ 2.67GHZ, he says its 2.67GHZ per core so i would have 10.68GHZ ! thats wat he says.....
trancemaster1996 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trancemaster1996 each Core runs at 2.66ghz so its 4@2.6ghz.
not 4 x 2.66ghz its so many peoples that make that mistake.
but threads is another thing....
nazurea 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trancemaster1996 each Core runs at 2.66ghz so its 4@2.6ghz.
not 4 x 2.66ghz its so many peoples that make that mistake.
but threads is another thing....
nazurea 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin its calculated at 4x2.66 ghz u idiot. DOnt comment if u dont know anything
1337Buylken 1 year ago
@1337Buylken unless you're trolling, you're an idiot
jeanforthewin 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin ur the idiot here fucktard.Dont try to be smart
1337Buylken 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin really? my computer says "core 0 2.93ghz" "core 1 2.93ghz" "core 2 2.93 ghz" "core 3 2.93 ghz" well hmm you learn something new every day.
megamindstorm101 1 year ago
@megamindstorm101 so your telling me that your cpu is clocked at 11.72 ghz.... please dont tell me your that stupid
askloglog 1 year ago
@askloglog no it just means I can run 8 threads. but here is what is confusing then. So my cpu is 2.93 divided into 4 cores and then hyperthreading makes each of those cores virtually divided in 2. and then turbo boost overclocks cores when others arent running.
megamindstorm101 1 year ago
Comment removed
askloglog 1 year ago
@megamindstorm101 ill send you a link to better understand the idea of ghz and cores of cpu
askloglog 1 year ago
dude, ive got the core 2 quad q9505 2.83 ghz, and it reads 2834.2 mhz per core. so his pc is running 53 ghz, .... check up on ur facts man.
piet10113 1 year ago
@piet10113 ffs, i can't believe how many people don't get this. to calculate your cpu speed you take the front side bus x multiplier x number of cores. for intel cpus like this one the multiplier is usually 9 so for example for 2.4 ghz (a standard Q6600) it would be 666x9x4=>2.4ghz. not 9.6 or something stupid
jeanforthewin 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin Don't you know how this works? You don't actually have to know anything to be an "internet expert". All you need is some vague knowlege of how to put letters together to form what could pass as words, as well as the ability to shit on your keyboard and call it knowledge.
Spectre426 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin Sad enough that a company like coolermaster doesnt know that....
SOSFreezer 1 year ago
Comment removed
clabszero 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jeanforthewin - Sounds like you got sold a single core CPU masked as a quad core. A CPU is measured by physical cores, so if you have a 2.66GHz quad core then YES that means it is 2.66GHz x 4 because there are actually four physical processing cores clocked at 2.66GHz each. I'm not sure where you got your information from but it is seriously outdated and incorrect.
clabszero 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jeanforthewin - Sounds like you got sold a single core CPU masked as a quad core. A CPU is measured by physical cores, so if you have a 2.66GHz quad core then YES that means it is 2.66GHz x 4 because there are actually four physical processing cores clocked at 2.66GHz each. I'm not sure where you got your information from but it is seriously outdated and incorrect.
clabszero 1 year ago
@jeanforthewin actually that depends on the running environment. If your running this as a vmware server It counts each cpu's clock cycles and adds them together giving you a total ghz rating and how much is left after you start loading it up no there is not one cpu running at 53ghz but in a virtualization standpoint you have 53ghz worth of clock cycles.
xgeko2 1 year ago
the cable management is awesome!
Elastane 1 year ago
could you use folding at home on this system please?
LizzyAston 1 year ago
i saw a main board that can take 4 prozesors at once -.-
De2t3ny 1 year ago
wit the rite sofwayre u cold make this into a cluster server in one box
cluster server= mutiple server spredind the load but acting ass one
croquis24 1 year ago
wow ... i didnt even thinnk that is possiable ... 5 out of 5 +)
CDLEGO 1 year ago
kuttay k bachay
pionloin 1 year ago
not so impressive if each system is seperate :(
QlimaxUK 1 year ago
i thought 1 pc with 53 GHz.. but, its 5 in 1 pc's.
siripuramrk 1 year ago
What are the motherboards mounted to ?
TheLittleWorldofGaz 1 year ago
-the computer for badasses-
ylkee 1 year ago
wow this has to be the most awesome-st computer I've ever seen!!!!!! Ihope to see more projects from you!
lewisvz 1 year ago
BTW at 2:41 that's not a coolermaster M1000
TheLittleWorldofGaz 2 years ago
it would be nice if you put all those 5 quadcores on one system :)
xxl606 2 years ago
Yeah, One PC with 20x 2,66 GHz (NOT with 53GHz). But impressive with that PSU. How did you manage using one PSU and starting each system separately? What parts did you use for that? Cause i wanna buld a sys like that too.
xpectthedeath 2 years ago
where are you from ??
Domeeee911 2 years ago
you do know youre not supposed to take the frequency and multiply it by the number of cores right?
q62fm 2 years ago
wow,, awesome case,,
bigdima3 2 years ago
I am extremely impressed. Great work! No get that thing Crunching for WCG/BOINC :)
CyberDruidtheModGod 2 years ago
Cabling management: STATE OF ART!
fokkeddie 2 years ago
thats sweet but im a bit confused on why u would want 5 systems in one case if ur not running them as one?
uwanaugoda 2 years ago
how is it 53ghz there is only 5 cpus at 2.66
hootis8 2 years ago
@hootis8 cant you do simple calculations?
4x2.66 per CPU = 10,64 Ghz
5 Systems, so there are 5 CPUs
5x10,64Ghz tatatataaaa :53,2Ghz ;)
SOSFreezer 2 years ago
It's 5 quad core so : 4x2.66x5=53Ghz
zagogame 2 years ago
NO...
SeanBondWBB 2 years ago
Why ?
zagogame 2 years ago
Because the CPU speed is still 2.66, it doesnt add it up and make it faster. its just better at multitasking
a fast dual core is better than a slow quad.
SeanBondWBB 2 years ago
For game yes but, for folding no ...
zagogame 2 years ago
folding with CPU is pointless, GPU performs much much better.
SeanBondWBB 2 years ago
Now i'm agree with you ;)
zagogame 2 years ago
games? at 2.66ghz?
TheLittleWorldofGaz 2 years ago
@TheLittleWorldofGaz do you know what cores are? =D
Eskmm1 1 year ago
@Eskmm1 yes why?
TheLittleWorldofGaz 1 year ago
@TheLittleWorldofGaz more cores to less frequency is generally better then less cores to more freqency, having a total of 10 or so Ghz is alot better then having only 6Ghz
Eskmm1 1 year ago
@Eskmm1 What are you on about? why are you saying this to me?
TheLittleWorldofGaz 1 year ago
@Eskmm1 depends actually. only if you were to utilise all cores would it be better.
LizzyAston 1 year ago
your talking about siries procesing but they can also do paralel processing so yes they do and dont add up if you catch my drift
cunijoeme 2 years ago
they did 2.66ghz and multiplied it by the number of cores (like many noobs do, although if they can do this theyre obviously no a noob...) and then multiplied it by the number of cpus
q62fm 2 years ago
Thats like 5 separate pcs, right? Why putting it together then? The processing power is not a sum of all 5 pcs when you are using one terminal, am i right? If im right, then thats one lousy pc, and if im wrong, than congratulations.
srsloth 2 years ago
The cable management on that case is nice. :)
stryeker 2 years ago 34
@stryeker
LauxHawk 1 year ago
Nice system. Ever consider donating some of that processor usage to F@H? Help scientist find out cures for diseases.
guit4rmaster 2 years ago
i also can't imagine it'd be very heat efficient if all 5 were under heavy load from gaming. or heck, even if 1 of those was under heavy load from gaming. not much space or room for air flow in that crowded case.
zaroba 2 years ago
5 computers in 1 case.
what exactly is the point of it unless you have a household with several people wanting to use a computer at once. and even then it's not to worthwhile.
zaroba 2 years ago
Awesome and F@H
Also heat would not be an issue since they are all on water.
TonkatrainHONKHONK 2 years ago
that case must be a beast