its obvious the ethical is not made by man, in so much as man is not himself but a specter in the 'environment'; the question arises in zizek because he is simple minded and uses bad coordinates; if man made the ethical laws would be truth. Zizek is simple minedly stuck on a system of thinking that build 'hemicenters' (shorthand for the abyss of a bad model) Zizek is guilty of being stuck in imbicility
A face gone gray, devoid of its particoloured luster, is still a face. In fact it is a face covered over with the ashes and soot of the World (in a Heideggerian sense). If it appears 'faceless' it is become in-face (in-human); an undead face (nota bene, this is already considered by Levinas). Those who return never really do; it is however another level of para-consistent movement (to put it in crude language accessible to Zizek). Zizek stays with his own metaphysics and so misses Levinas.
its obvious the ethical is not made by man, in so much as man is not himself but a specter in the 'environment'; the question arises in zizek because he is simple minded and uses bad coordinates; if man made the ethical laws would be truth. Zizek is simple minedly stuck on a system of thinking that build 'hemicenters' (shorthand for the abyss of a bad model) Zizek is guilty of being stuck in imbicility
RonneltheHypocrite 5 months ago
A face gone gray, devoid of its particoloured luster, is still a face. In fact it is a face covered over with the ashes and soot of the World (in a Heideggerian sense). If it appears 'faceless' it is become in-face (in-human); an undead face (nota bene, this is already considered by Levinas). Those who return never really do; it is however another level of para-consistent movement (to put it in crude language accessible to Zizek). Zizek stays with his own metaphysics and so misses Levinas.
FannyPagnol 5 months ago