The Climate is Constantly Changing

[nman48]

The scientific method does not use consensus to cut off debate. One outcome gives you government funding, one outcome does not, which one will be chosen. Use of alarmism to create a consensus, not the scientific method. Only scientists who accept the global warming argument are considered "relevant". Totally stacked deck.

[MattsonGriffiths]

The Fraser Institute needs to show some research rather than putting together a straight up propagandist video like this without ANY backing. They exaggerate all of their claims to turn environmentalism into a movement that transforms society into a dirty and poor place. This stuff disgusts me.

[jamieson55]

I can see this video has all you bedwetters rattled. Must be hard for you when someone dares question "the Gorical".

[wilbert1755]

How about this?

a decline in average temperature by a Kelvin each decade, or normal weather change before I turn 40? (34 years' time). see how easy that was. No Emotion no Hysteria.

[wilbert1755]

But how can a child do that? when they are being indoctrinated in believing a non event.

[pg0666]

I am ignorant myself when it comes to global warming. Whenever there is so much frenzied hype about an issue I do have to question the blind faith people have in following a cause that most have no idea about, this includes our leaders. I don't think the video was very well done or hit on some of the points I would have liked it to. Seems to me that most of you just don't get it. The reason for the video is not to tell you you're wrong, it's telling you to think for yourself and stop following.

[MattsonGriffiths]

We're not following out of blind 'faith'. Hard evidence and absolute agreement among the relevant scientists is what this "following" is based off of. Don't let the skeptic's tactics obscure the proper science!

[wilbert1755]

"There are ecological limits to growth, and it doesn't matter if you're "free" if you can no longer grow food to eat."

we have all heard that crap before!

" The battle to feed humanity is over. In the 1970s, the world will undergo famines. Hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. Paul Ehrlich, in The Population Bomb (1968)

[wilbert1755]

"I have done research, I am doing the research, and everything I have found points to anthropogenic climate change, caused by an increase in greenhouse gases, and feedback loops that occur due to that." Bovine Dropping ! show the "research" My bet is ..speculative nonsense!

[wilbert1755]

Congress rejected Kyoto 95 to 0 and that was during the Clinton administration. "I'm doing a Ph.D. right now in climate change, both physical and human." Hope you get a refund.

[longsaber]

human beings are causing enormous negative impacts to our world, and the life supporting systems. There are ecological limits to growth, and it doesn't matter if you're "free" if you can no longer grow food to eat.

[longsaber]

when you look at the people who fund

the "major" climate change skeptics, you will not have to scratch the surface very hard before oil starts pouring it.

if climate change was some elitist plot to subvert freedoms, then Bush would have signed on to Kyoto, and he would support the world government of the UN. he he didn't, that theory is stupid.

[Unhindered]

jdeazy400m wrote: "you're one of the few people that fail to recognize the overwhelming evidence supporting climate change. Go back to your trailer and continue watching Glen Beck you hick."

That's right, carrying on the good ol' tradition of condemning those who dare question the scientific and political power holders. Galileo was condemned for daring to question, and those who dare to question today will be treated likewise by those in power.

Flat-earthers couldn't accept challenges either.

[wilbert1755]

A glitch in satellite sensors caused scientists to underestimate the extent of Arctic sea ice by 500,000 square kilometers (193,000 square miles)... what was reported? " Sea ice in the Arctic Ocean has melted to its lowest volume in recorded history, according to new measurements." Of course anyone who dare ask a question is to be vilified insulted and attacked instantly by the likes of crank and desmutblog. They are not scientists just some hacks from the David Suzuki Foundation.

[ellijulie]

You wish!

What a stunning video. Irrefutable logic, really?

[bill127234]

News flash, the sun has entered a prolonged quite period, not seen since 1913, ending the modern maxima. The world is cooling.

The sun ended the hoax.

[frankbi]

News Flash #1 for the Fraser "irrefutable logic and common sense" Institute:

THERE IS SUCH A THING AS A NON-ELECTRIC TOOTHBRUSH.

News Flash #2 for the Fraser Institute:

People die naturally; always have; always will. But it's still possible for someone to be murdered.

The climate changes naturally; always has; always will. But [fill in the blank here]

"Irrefutable logic" my foot. QUESTION THE FRASER INSTITUTE'S HYPE, PEOPLE.

[7thEraMan]

Anyone who unquestioningly listens to this is an ignoramous of the highest degree.

I won't deny that the climate changes: Antarctica was once a tropical jungle - But the world should be COOLING, NOT WARMING.

If we didn't have that effect counteracting our actions, we'd be even more inundated with our own mistakes.

and to "AlbertaGamer" please be quiet. I live in Canada too, it SNOWS here. and you're an hour away from GLACIERS in those mountains, so expect a bit of cold stuff.

[Unhindered]

7thEraMan wrote: "I won't deny that the climate changes: Antarctica was once a tropical jungle - But the world should be COOLING, NOT WARMING."

Why SHOULD the world be cooling, not warming? Would it be better if we had an ice age? Really?

[7thEraMan]

The hype in the 70's was that the world was cooling, and the theory I see the most logic in is that our solar system orbits into a dust cloud on a regular basis, lowering rays that strike the earth.

And I'll answer your question with another question: which is better? a decline in average temperature by a Kelvin each decade, or cataclysmic weather changes before I turn 40? (34 years' time)

[caldude]

The global elite are pushing the global warming hoax because they want to tax you and control you. They won't be changing their lifestyle however.

[AlbertaGamer]

AGREEMENT

Why hasn't this video gotten more views?

- because it has never been featured.

Why is it never featured?

That is the question.

I was born in southern Alberta in the early 70's. The first time I saw snow in June, July, or August was in 1990. It then proceeded to happen again in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1999, 2000, and 2002. That's 7 times in 12 years.

And sometimes (like August 1992 and July 1999) this meant one to two FEET of snow - an hour EAST of the mountains.

[aerobatic]

Bravo! Now, we need to question the hype surrounding the other government-created crises, like housing busts, bank failures, and soaring health care costs.

[designwrite]

Question the hype -- bang on! Excellent video. Way to go Fraser Institute.

[11mc22]

Best Fraser institute video so far

5stars