'On The Trail Of And At The Trial Of James Maybrick Pt 1'

[comityofspiders]

Great stuff Tony, really nice to see enthusiasts, not armchair ripperologists.

Most of the houses that were on Riversdale Road were destroyed in WWII save Battlecrease. Most of the land about Battlecrease were it's grounds and Maybrick walked to the station thru' the garden.

Tumblety the American quack doctor was over 6ft tall with a ridiculous moustache, well known and recognisable. He was a homosexual paedophiliac - no interest in women, not JTR!

[WINDTALKER300]

there was two rippers prince albert victor and james maybrick niether of them were associated

[splicer45]

I suggest anyone who has doubts about Maybrick read Paul Feldman's The Final Chapter.There are simply too many coincidences to reach any other conclusion that he was indeed the ripper.

[rainbowpride76]

The James Maybrick diary was a forgery! He didn't do any of these things!

[rainbowpride76]

@rainbowpride76 Thanks for posting though, good vid, love hearing your commentary as you walk along.

[LRon2009]

@rainbowpride76...there is a differance between forgery and copy...its more of a ''second edition''.

[rainbowpride76]

@LRon2009 No! It was all a fabrication. The actual author admitted it!

[LRon2009]

@rainbowpride76 ..i agree he or somebody he knew wrote it..my point is it was copied from another book...i realized it was a copy after cross checking the last few days of the ''diary'' against the book ''the trial of florence maybrick''..all he or another individual did was to alter some names and dates to put his mark on it,when he was questioned about this he always had to have a few days to think about it leading to the most likely conclusion he was getting his knowledge from a third party.

[LRon2009]

@rainbowpride76..my guess is the old guy he claims gave it to him was asked to make a copy of the ''real'' diary and kept a draught with a few added mistakes as is normal ( to prevent later misidentification) and when he passed it on he failed to tell M.Barrett what they were..MB claims his wife wrote it ''at my dictation'' meaning he told her what to write from a draught and she did....verbatim.

[rainbowpride76]

@LRon2009 I do agree with you there.

[LRon2009]

@rainbowpride76 . by checking every topic on this suspect on youtube and your posts in them its blattently obvious you have never read either book,and as all your posts say exactly the same thing you are either a troll or an idiot.

[rainbowpride76]

@LRon2009 Wow, aren't you a charmer! I own the book actually. It has several pictures of James Meybrick himself, the diary printed as written (in the author's script, not typed) and also a typed version for ease of reading. Do not accuse someone of something when you have no way of proving it..

[LRon2009]

@rainbowpride76 ...laughable.If you had bothered to read it or ToFM you would have noticed the family name was actually Maybrick (nice to see a detective on the trail) ,its the content that should be examined not the alleged author.....wikipedia/Plagiaris­m

[rainbowpride76]

@LRon2009 For goodness sake that was a spelling mistake on my part! Wow!! That must mean everything you said is true, and I was lying because I typed an 'E' instead of an 'A'...

[LRon2009]

@rainbowpride76 lol..on reflection you could have pointed out i spelt ''draft'' as''draught''...notwithstandin­g,anybody could claim they wrote something (J Archer) and later deny it ,which is exactly what MB did if you check his affidavits.

[Mrevil999]

call me sick - but im kinda happy my ancestor gets so much publicity about being jack the ripper and the poisoning case. yes, james is my great great great grandfathers brother - im harry maybrick :P

[ROCKSLIDZ]

Interesting to actually see the places I hear referred to by theorists... thanks for posting this.