These were actually in place before my work remodeled the bathrooms in '07. They were '92 models. They've now been replaced with the Cadet 3s shown on my channel.
Not a mismatch at all - both tank and bowl were made for a short time from around 1989 to 1993-94. When federal mandates called for 1.6 gpf, Am Std had to come up with a different Cadet. And there have been several that were terrible.
1989 - 1 year away from the 90's, they obviously just printed their "new" logo on it, wouldn't say it's mismatched. Plus logo's can be different to the cistern ones at times.
Interesting, considering I've only seen the red, vertical American Standard calligraphy on models from the 90's. But still, I feel something here is mismatched, whatever it might be.
Exactly! I remember from when I was a kid, we had a really crappy (no pun intended) toilet. So we had it (maybe) partially replaced but kept the tank.
this looks strange in the trapway, never seen anything like it in my life..
sgrahn66 10 months ago
These aren't rare actually, the last version of cadet before it went low flow.
maroonloo 1 year ago
Happy birthday to your toilet. LOL
gusherb94 2 years ago
this is probably 1993
Fun4Toilets 2 years ago
That's impossible; the toilet tank indicates that it was made on April 23, 1989.
mrKRW 2 years ago
April 23rd is my moms birthday. lol
gusherb94 2 years ago
Might as well bake her a cake modeled after this toilet, lol.
mrKRW 2 years ago
lol ok
Fun4Toilets 2 years ago
I have the same one. I don't know any one else that has one they are so rare.
meeloothekid 2 years ago
Well now you found out about someone else who has this rare toilet :).
mrKRW 2 years ago
These were actually in place before my work remodeled the bathrooms in '07. They were '92 models. They've now been replaced with the Cadet 3s shown on my channel.
sanders8323 2 years ago
I've experienced this toilet. It's definitely the worst flushing Cadet they make aside from the low flow models.
sanders8323 2 years ago
This one's not that bad
mrKRW 2 years ago
True. They actually still make this toilet in Canada since 3.5 gpf is still legal there.
sanders8323 2 years ago
So you're saying that this toilet uses 3.5 gallons of water per flush?
mrKRW 2 years ago
Yes
sanders8323 2 years ago
Thanks :)
mrKRW 2 years ago
awesome toilet........definitely a great flush and nice ending!!
flushboyaz 2 years ago
hmm looks like american standard managed to make a non sluggish elongated model at the end their. it flushes like the 1980s gerber's did.
gusherb94 2 years ago
Not a mismatch at all - both tank and bowl were made for a short time from around 1989 to 1993-94. When federal mandates called for 1.6 gpf, Am Std had to come up with a different Cadet. And there have been several that were terrible.
thesmart67 2 years ago
It is the short-lived Cadet toilet common from about 1989-93 before the 1.6 gpf mandate came in from Uncle Sam. It is not a mismatch.
thesmart67 2 years ago
Not a mismatch you say? Well, I guess I must have a pretty obscure toilet, according to you. You're also saying this is a 3.5 gpf?
mrKRW 2 years ago
1989 - 1 year away from the 90's, they obviously just printed their "new" logo on it, wouldn't say it's mismatched. Plus logo's can be different to the cistern ones at times.
ramdomness453 2 years ago
So you're saying the logo on the bowl might be from the late 80's?
mrKRW 2 years ago
Yep
ramdomness453 2 years ago
Interesting, considering I've only seen the red, vertical American Standard calligraphy on models from the 90's. But still, I feel something here is mismatched, whatever it might be.
mrKRW 2 years ago
Could be the models, but also another possibility is that that bowl is replaced, and the cistern is original. I've seen it happen here.
ramdomness453 2 years ago
Exactly! I remember from when I was a kid, we had a really crappy (no pun intended) toilet. So we had it (maybe) partially replaced but kept the tank.
mrKRW 2 years ago
Very interesting.. I think you are right and its just mismatched.
toiletfanextreme 2 years ago