Why not reduce nukes? The US could easily nuke every place on earth several times over, and you only need to nuke a place once before it will not support life, so, there's only so many nukes we would ever need, short of an alien invasion.
Yeah right cut all your nukes off so WE (USA) have more then you. Then we can bomb you and beat you at every war! So funny how USA make it sound like they are looking after the interest of everyone else by cutting 80% of it off.
Obama is not an average american. Just look into his past and his past and present friends. Tony Rezco, Rev. Wright and that wacky church he "preached" in. Nothing like putting in an earmark to give your wife a very hefty raise after you make it into the senate. He's a crook, just like the rest of them. The only difference is the media is in love with him...for now. It's like he can do no wrong and it's taboo to criticize him or just not like him.
That's not true. I'd have to look up the numbers but I believe since the Reagan or HW Bush era we've had treaties with USSR & later Russia where we agreed to reduce our nukes. I recall this because they used the plutonium from the war heads for nuclear power stations. Stop worshiping Obama and stop believing all the hype you read in the paper and watch on tv.
That was pure unadulterated sarcasm. Please explain to me how he's any better than past presidents. He appears to be a professional bullshit artist just like WJC. So far he's done nothing but run up the deficit like GWB, but he's off to an early start. More bailouts and bigger government. He took a hold of the reins from GWB Where's the change?? (other than more attempted assaults on our 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments)
I thought Obama was going to fix everything! You know, end poverty, racism, corruption, wars, etc. He's change the world for the better and utopia will become a reality.
If we suffer monetary collapse after runaway inflation we won't be powerful enough to keep ourselves fed, let alone to be able to bully around other nations anymore.
Haha... well I'm not American, but I'm interested to know how much you actually believe that. You honestly believe, 100% truthfully that in 6 years America will no longer exist? If youtube still exists then, I'll hold you to that statement. ;)
I can clearly see that you are retarded. Obama is trying to make world a more peaceful place to live. No one really cares that if you have lots of nukes. To be honest your soviet aged rockets couldn't even launch them. Nukes are bullshit.
))) You so stupid. An old rocket the Satan is much more powerful than the newest Russian or American rockets. It uses solid fuel therefore will work not years but centuries.
Nukes are the reason the superpowers do not fight with each-other. Mutually assured destruction IS the reason we're at peace.
This kind of move will not make the world a more peaceful place to live, if anything, getting rid of nukes would make this world a far more violent place to live if it triggers a war between the superpowers.
Good question!! Another good question is if Obama is against more nuclear power plants, what in the heck are we supposed to do with all the plutonium from the war heads?
no, Russia should not go that far with nuclear weapon reduction. Russia should always keep the capability of destroying NATO-US, otherwise the country is doomed once americans put their modernized AMDS in place.
lol zionist means that he is a supporter for jewish settlement u retard this has nothing to do with jews. it involves nukes a black guy, some bacon, and that russian guy
i say that any country that has nukes they should get rid of them by a certain time.and after the time is up,any country with nukes should be destroyed,because now they are breaking the law of earth.
lol..funny,i want Horus to fix it all..lol..lol well,in order to rid the world of nukes,the people need to be awaken from fear.the people of this planet have to believe in something rather believe in them self.there has to be an awaking of knowledge.but i have found out that most people dont care as long as someone tells them how to live.they cant make their own mind up someone has to lead them.Carl Sagan,Alan Watts,Robert A. Wilson,Terence McKenna these people type should have been more of
Our goal as Americans should be to eliminate our entire nuclear stockpile on one condition: we have proven, tested and hugely redundant ABS systems covering all our interests. If we have that, then we don't need to have indiscriminate death dealers like the h-bomb.
You are right that is the common acryonym, but to describe the entire system, which includes the projectile component as well as detection, you can use ABS. If you web search ABS and anti-ballistic system you will find a board called physics forum.
Sounds like a pussy move, designed to appeal to his voter base.
To get rid of 100% of the nukes would be insane. A nuclear response is exactly what has kept this world at "peace" for this long. It's what keeps China out of the US, Russia out of Alaska, the US out of Russia, ect.
Mutually assured destruction IS the reason the superpowers do not fight amongst each-other anymore (although they still do underhandedly).
Well said, and I agree completely. These people calling for 100% disarming are living in a fantasy world, where everyone always gets along, and no one kills each at all anymore. It's an ultimate fantasy.
SatorKein it is one thing to not like the US and Obama, it is another thing to call him a n***er. That shows your racism , ignorance , and lack of education. I thought under the former Soviet Union ALL people all considered equal. I am sure Putin and Medvedev would dissapprove of Russians using that kind of degrading racial comments.
I am good all having considered have changed the opinion, reduction of the nuclear weapon is necessary. Russia to build tanks is much cheaper than nuclear bombs. That about my education - I the student of university.
Agree about nuclear weapons. Russia and American should lead the way in the effort to eliminate all nukes from the earth. Just have to be wise about it.
One step closer to proving WWIII/World's end theorist wrong, but not 100% No matter what happens in the future if Nuclear weapons are used the rest of the planet will suffer. 5 lbs of plutonium detonated in the Ionosphere is enough to kill every living thing on the planet. There is Currently 80 lbs orbiting the Globe in US Military Satelites alone. :( Risky but Mutual fear sometimes is the strongest proponent of Peace U.S.A. Forever!
Obama seems to be very smart. The running cost for the rockets are pretty high. Russia welcomes such a decision, because the Russian population does not want to spend a lot of money on shit (we have good education).
USA spends 10x as much as Russia and still can not overtake and beat us. Don't you ask yourself why? I can tell you....you are genetically a bunch of barbarians. Remember that Anglosaxons were barbarians to the Roman Empire. Nothing has changed!
ConOrder , the only true Americans are the Native American Indians who were massacred and almost annhilated by disease by white European settlers. PS - not all Americans are of AngloSaxon heritage.
Is it really in Russia's interest to get on the bad side of president Obama, he willing to have better relations with Russia and the Russians must seize this oppurtunity don't you think so?
Better I dont know if it is so. He offered to stop mounting THAAD in EU wich are being deployed there against IRAN if we agrree to cut .WTF?So against whom are they created?
If Obama does this, he may then require some extra special protection from any capitalist extremist rogue elements in the Pentagon.
Those rogue elements are run by the big defense contractors who will greatly dislike
losing billions of dollars with Obama's big weapons reduction. They may spread rumors claiming Obama is a communist, which is what they said about President Kennedy before they killed him. After JFK was assassinated, the arms build-up went back into full production. Greed.
Why not reduce nukes? The US could easily nuke every place on earth several times over, and you only need to nuke a place once before it will not support life, so, there's only so many nukes we would ever need, short of an alien invasion.
Dacadvid 2 years ago
Yeah right cut all your nukes off so WE (USA) have more then you. Then we can bomb you and beat you at every war! So funny how USA make it sound like they are looking after the interest of everyone else by cutting 80% of it off.
siu16 2 years ago
i wouldnt do it
youyouboy12 2 years ago
dont do it
youyouboy12 2 years ago
Why not?
stankomi 2 years ago
Hmm NUTS !
hornborgdk 2 years ago
Obama is not an average american. Just look into his past and his past and present friends. Tony Rezco, Rev. Wright and that wacky church he "preached" in. Nothing like putting in an earmark to give your wife a very hefty raise after you make it into the senate. He's a crook, just like the rest of them. The only difference is the media is in love with him...for now. It's like he can do no wrong and it's taboo to criticize him or just not like him.
packrat76 2 years ago
That's not true. I'd have to look up the numbers but I believe since the Reagan or HW Bush era we've had treaties with USSR & later Russia where we agreed to reduce our nukes. I recall this because they used the plutonium from the war heads for nuclear power stations. Stop worshiping Obama and stop believing all the hype you read in the paper and watch on tv.
packrat76 2 years ago
That was pure unadulterated sarcasm. Please explain to me how he's any better than past presidents. He appears to be a professional bullshit artist just like WJC. So far he's done nothing but run up the deficit like GWB, but he's off to an early start. More bailouts and bigger government. He took a hold of the reins from GWB Where's the change?? (other than more attempted assaults on our 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments)
packrat76 2 years ago
I thought Obama was going to fix everything! You know, end poverty, racism, corruption, wars, etc. He's change the world for the better and utopia will become a reality.
packrat76 2 years ago
If we suffer monetary collapse after runaway inflation we won't be powerful enough to keep ourselves fed, let alone to be able to bully around other nations anymore.
packrat76 2 years ago
We won't do it.
GrandAdmiralGilad 3 years ago
Haha... well I'm not American, but I'm interested to know how much you actually believe that. You honestly believe, 100% truthfully that in 6 years America will no longer exist? If youtube still exists then, I'll hold you to that statement. ;)
robbibt 3 years ago
It is correct. But, as well as at all politicians it only conversations and is no more!
Anahay777 3 years ago
I can clearly see that you are retarded. Obama is trying to make world a more peaceful place to live. No one really cares that if you have lots of nukes. To be honest your soviet aged rockets couldn't even launch them. Nukes are bullshit.
kunQQ 3 years ago
))) You so stupid. An old rocket the Satan is much more powerful than the newest Russian or American rockets. It uses solid fuel therefore will work not years but centuries.
SatorKein 3 years ago
Never estimate the weapon on its age. The modern plastic trash is much worse than that weapon that did 30-40 years ago.
SatorKein 3 years ago
Nukes are the reason the superpowers do not fight with each-other. Mutually assured destruction IS the reason we're at peace.
This kind of move will not make the world a more peaceful place to live, if anything, getting rid of nukes would make this world a far more violent place to live if it triggers a war between the superpowers.
AnduinX 2 years ago
i c a point there
Rasul316 2 years ago
You took the words right out of my mouth...well fingers.
ChrissnKiss16 2 years ago
Nukes are the reason superpowers haven't yet fought with each other. Just though I would correct that for you.
Glasya666 2 years ago
Nice to see that anti-Americanism has not fallen out of fashion here despite the fact that Bush is out of office. Ha ha ha XD
abarzilai664 3 years ago
Yo Man real NIGGA!Obama beats 50 cent in pomposity of cars, cortege,innaguration.
Globalizator1 3 years ago
Russia got its nukes pointed at the New World Order.
barlog20 3 years ago
I think Putin`s response is going to be:"Negro please"
barlog20 3 years ago
призывы изменить звук с моно-стерео
MoonlightSonata1977 3 years ago
how about israel
shoyod 3 years ago
Good question!! Another good question is if Obama is against more nuclear power plants, what in the heck are we supposed to do with all the plutonium from the war heads?
packrat76 3 years ago
no, Russia should not go that far with nuclear weapon reduction. Russia should always keep the capability of destroying NATO-US, otherwise the country is doomed once americans put their modernized AMDS in place.
mikkitiny 3 years ago
lol zionist means that he is a supporter for jewish settlement u retard this has nothing to do with jews. it involves nukes a black guy, some bacon, and that russian guy
PS3ROCK2509 3 years ago
WTH! Im getting sound but only one 3 of my speakers. Only the right ones. Hmm, Thats wierd!
NorthWestSimulations 3 years ago
Obama is the American Gorbachev! In six years time, you'll be divded into seperate states and your people spread throughout the world.
MoskvaPeterburg 3 years ago
Zionist trick! I hope Putin doesn't fall for it
minatorus 3 years ago
Putin is far too intelligent to fall for a zionist plant.
barlog20 3 years ago
i say that any country that has nukes they should get rid of them by a certain time.and after the time is up,any country with nukes should be destroyed,because now they are breaking the law of earth.
eromnoops1 3 years ago
If everyone else gets rid of theirs, who and how would a country destroy a country that kept their nukes??
packrat76 3 years ago
with all the nukes left over...lol..well that a good question.i will get back with you on that
eromnoops1 2 years ago
OK, let me know what you come up with. Don't worry about anything people. Obama is our messiah. He'll fix everything!
packrat76 2 years ago
lol..funny,i want Horus to fix it all..lol..lol well,in order to rid the world of nukes,the people need to be awaken from fear.the people of this planet have to believe in something rather believe in them self.there has to be an awaking of knowledge.but i have found out that most people dont care as long as someone tells them how to live.they cant make their own mind up someone has to lead them.Carl Sagan,Alan Watts,Robert A. Wilson,Terence McKenna these people type should have been more of
eromnoops1 2 years ago
I am having the same problem no sound =/
filetitan 3 years ago
No idea maybe its your Sound card or sound drivers playing up
trignite 3 years ago
yeah, prob my sound drivers since I could watch other RussianToday videos (they might of used a different codec set for this one)
Thanks for the advise.
filetitan 3 years ago
I am not getting any sound anyone know what's going on?
filetitan 3 years ago
Our goal as Americans should be to eliminate our entire nuclear stockpile on one condition: we have proven, tested and hugely redundant ABS systems covering all our interests. If we have that, then we don't need to have indiscriminate death dealers like the h-bomb.
mattlewis66 3 years ago
Oh please. you must be one of those American cnn zombies.America is the biggest terrorist in the world.
barlog20 3 years ago
Yeah, ABS works great on my car, especially in the snow, ice and wet pavement, but what does ABS have to do with H-bombs?
packrat76 3 years ago
Anti-Ballistic Systems -- Lol.
mattlewis66 3 years ago
I think you mean ABM, not ABS.
packrat76 3 years ago
You are right that is the common acryonym, but to describe the entire system, which includes the projectile component as well as detection, you can use ABS. If you web search ABS and anti-ballistic system you will find a board called physics forum.
mattlewis66 3 years ago
Sounds like a pussy move, designed to appeal to his voter base.
To get rid of 100% of the nukes would be insane. A nuclear response is exactly what has kept this world at "peace" for this long. It's what keeps China out of the US, Russia out of Alaska, the US out of Russia, ect.
Mutually assured destruction IS the reason the superpowers do not fight amongst each-other anymore (although they still do underhandedly).
AnduinX 3 years ago
very well said
asadinhogaucho 3 years ago
Well said, and I agree completely. These people calling for 100% disarming are living in a fantasy world, where everyone always gets along, and no one kills each at all anymore. It's an ultimate fantasy.
packrat76 2 years ago
Russia should tell to it nigger - NOT!
SatorKein 3 years ago
SatorKein it is one thing to not like the US and Obama, it is another thing to call him a n***er. That shows your racism , ignorance , and lack of education. I thought under the former Soviet Union ALL people all considered equal. I am sure Putin and Medvedev would dissapprove of Russians using that kind of degrading racial comments.
yaspeedyrn1975 3 years ago
@yaspeedyrn1975
I am good all having considered have changed the opinion, reduction of the nuclear weapon is necessary. Russia to build tanks is much cheaper than nuclear bombs. That about my education - I the student of university.
SatorKein 3 years ago
Agree about nuclear weapons. Russia and American should lead the way in the effort to eliminate all nukes from the earth. Just have to be wise about it.
mattlewis66 3 years ago
В БАНЮ ОБАНЮ!
LuvArtem 3 years ago 2
One step closer to proving WWIII/World's end theorist wrong, but not 100% No matter what happens in the future if Nuclear weapons are used the rest of the planet will suffer. 5 lbs of plutonium detonated in the Ionosphere is enough to kill every living thing on the planet. There is Currently 80 lbs orbiting the Globe in US Military Satelites alone. :( Risky but Mutual fear sometimes is the strongest proponent of Peace U.S.A. Forever!
MindsUnleashed 3 years ago
5 lbs detonated is enough to kill every living thing on the planet?? What about bunch of rubbish.
packrat76 2 years ago
Nuclear blasts are very beatiful!!! Whu we must cut this beaty=) We must nuke them all and watch this beaty=)))
Vel1al 3 years ago
thats not going to happen
nobody is gonna surrender thier nukes
kreigsmann 3 years ago
Obama seems to be very smart. The running cost for the rockets are pretty high. Russia welcomes such a decision, because the Russian population does not want to spend a lot of money on shit (we have good education).
USA spends 10x as much as Russia and still can not overtake and beat us. Don't you ask yourself why? I can tell you....you are genetically a bunch of barbarians. Remember that Anglosaxons were barbarians to the Roman Empire. Nothing has changed!
ConOrder 3 years ago
ConOrder , the only true Americans are the Native American Indians who were massacred and almost annhilated by disease by white European settlers. PS - not all Americans are of AngloSaxon heritage.
yaspeedyrn1975 3 years ago
Where is the sound?
derigid 3 years ago
yeah the bastard wants to take away your guns and your nukes XD
CRX35E 3 years ago
I wants nukes cut by 100%
80% sill pretty awesome !
14842 3 years ago
Sounds like sheer populism.
wladorost 3 years ago
Nuklear blasts are so beautifull how we can cut 80% of nukes.
Globalizator1 3 years ago 3
Besides, how will we defend the Earth when aliens invade??
wladorost 3 years ago 5
we will defend Earth from now on, not poor america.
VictorWasechkin 3 years ago
@wladorost HAARP can destroy a planet. /watch?v=MnRPZOUVhJ4
HeadSHOT604 3 weeks ago
It is fake he knows we will reject it.He wants Russia to look like monster.
Globalizator1 3 years ago
Is it really in Russia's interest to get on the bad side of president Obama, he willing to have better relations with Russia and the Russians must seize this oppurtunity don't you think so?
abarzilai664 3 years ago
Better I dont know if it is so. He offered to stop mounting THAAD in EU wich are being deployed there against IRAN if we agrree to cut .WTF?So against whom are they created?
Globalizator1 3 years ago
If Obama does this, he may then require some extra special protection from any capitalist extremist rogue elements in the Pentagon.
Those rogue elements are run by the big defense contractors who will greatly dislike
losing billions of dollars with Obama's big weapons reduction. They may spread rumors claiming Obama is a communist, which is what they said about President Kennedy before they killed him. After JFK was assassinated, the arms build-up went back into full production. Greed.
Rockguitarnow 3 years ago 2
so you think Obama will be assasinated as well? or at least a kind of such plot will be possible?
VictorWasechkin 3 years ago
Obama is very short sighted in some matters.
santan25 3 years ago