Haha. Im Indian and i too welcome it. I belive Russia and India should be the Superpowers of the World. Their should be no war between anybody,we have one enemy and thats Terrorism.
The Iraq invasion was terrible; Americans did not want it. It was driven by Bush and Cheney. It was a big mistake that the new administration is trying to undo, but it will take some time.
It wasn't terrorism, is hurting and killing people for no reason or a malicious reason, while what the American military did was in good intentions although un-needed. We went to Iraq under the misinterpretation that they had WMD's and history of Saddam being ruthless and gassing his own citizens in the northern provinces. We went their to defend all and free them and we ended up giving them democracy but unfortunately bad leadership and heavy civilian casualties were a trade off.
R u an idiot? Saddam atrocities were fully funded by the U.S.. All the chemical, military, etc. And after, once upon a time saddam became an utterly vicious dictator who had to be removed?
~
Are you that stupid that you don't realize how subjective the term "good" is? Anything that is good for you might be an opposite to the others?
~
Did you ask them whether they wanted your so-called "democracy" for the price of over one million dead?
Wow what a fool. Good obviously meant we didn't want Saddam to develop new weapons and destroy the middle east. Show me evidence that we fucking funded the Saddam Regime's military and I will actually acknowledge your pitiful reiterations. Iraqi's didn't get terrorized by the US, they got terrorized under the rule of Saddam. War's means war, civilians get killed, and if you're going to call it something else "terrorism" go back to the shit filled place you came from.
Is commiting "intentional acts", that are 100% sure to produce countless death's among civilian population any different from killing civilian's "unintentionally"?
~
Me, being a civilian, do I care whether or not you want my death if you're 100% aware of the fact that I'm going to die after you invade my country and it still doesn't stop you from doing that?
~
No, for me you're a fucking terrorist. Period, since you trigger terrorism itself by your own actions.
Then call every war ever fought an act of terrorism. The difference that is blind to you is terrorist mean to kill civilian and militaries like the United States try to limit the amount of civilian casualties as much as possible. If there was 100,000 terrorist invading my country I'm sure everyone would be dead but if it was a military they would work in the best interest of themselves which is typically not to kill civilians purposely which is terrorism.
Are you an idiot? Saddam's atrocities were fully funded by the U.S. Chemical, military, torture etc. And after that, for some unknown reason Hussein became "an utterly vicious dictateor" who had to be removed?
~
Don't you realize how subjective term "good" is? Anything that is good for you might be an opposite for the others?
~
Did you ask iraqi's whether they wanted your so-called "democracy" for the price of over one million dead?
~
Don't you feel that Iraqi's got literally "terrorised"?
New World Russian Order!!!)))))) Stupid news!)))
MaXXX1k 3 years ago
I welcome it. Im from Russia. We have common problems. For example, China ...
skrattar747 3 years ago
Haha. Im Indian and i too welcome it. I belive Russia and India should be the Superpowers of the World. Their should be no war between anybody,we have one enemy and thats Terrorism.
dudhala21 3 years ago
Is U.S. invading Iraq was an example of so-called "terrorism"? What is "terrorism"?
pplayer666 3 years ago
The Iraq invasion was terrible; Americans did not want it. It was driven by Bush and Cheney. It was a big mistake that the new administration is trying to undo, but it will take some time.
PERIZ99 3 years ago
You didn't answer the question. Is so-called "big mistake" equates so-called "terrorism" or not?
pplayer666 3 years ago
It wasn't terrorism, is hurting and killing people for no reason or a malicious reason, while what the American military did was in good intentions although un-needed. We went to Iraq under the misinterpretation that they had WMD's and history of Saddam being ruthless and gassing his own citizens in the northern provinces. We went their to defend all and free them and we ended up giving them democracy but unfortunately bad leadership and heavy civilian casualties were a trade off.
youcrazy91 3 years ago 2
R u an idiot? Saddam atrocities were fully funded by the U.S.. All the chemical, military, etc. And after, once upon a time saddam became an utterly vicious dictator who had to be removed?
~
Are you that stupid that you don't realize how subjective the term "good" is? Anything that is good for you might be an opposite to the others?
~
Did you ask them whether they wanted your so-called "democracy" for the price of over one million dead?
~
Don't you feel iraqi's got literally "terrorised"?
pplayer666 3 years ago
Wow what a fool. Good obviously meant we didn't want Saddam to develop new weapons and destroy the middle east. Show me evidence that we fucking funded the Saddam Regime's military and I will actually acknowledge your pitiful reiterations. Iraqi's didn't get terrorized by the US, they got terrorized under the rule of Saddam. War's means war, civilians get killed, and if you're going to call it something else "terrorism" go back to the shit filled place you came from.
youcrazy91 3 years ago
Terrorism is committing intentional acts of violence or threats against civilians.
The U.S. has never and will never intentionally kill civilians.
Point Made
Any Response will be ignored as it is mere Ignorance itself.
youcrazy91 3 years ago
Is commiting "intentional acts", that are 100% sure to produce countless death's among civilian population any different from killing civilian's "unintentionally"?
~
Me, being a civilian, do I care whether or not you want my death if you're 100% aware of the fact that I'm going to die after you invade my country and it still doesn't stop you from doing that?
~
No, for me you're a fucking terrorist. Period, since you trigger terrorism itself by your own actions.
pplayer666 3 years ago
Then call every war ever fought an act of terrorism. The difference that is blind to you is terrorist mean to kill civilian and militaries like the United States try to limit the amount of civilian casualties as much as possible. If there was 100,000 terrorist invading my country I'm sure everyone would be dead but if it was a military they would work in the best interest of themselves which is typically not to kill civilians purposely which is terrorism.
Terror = emotion
Terrorism = Action
youcrazy91 3 years ago
We are not currently at war right now =)
Iraq is not at war with the us but we are occupying their territory.
randall172 3 years ago
actually the police officers of detroit intentiolly killed several black citizens.....
take that
randall172 3 years ago
I'm pretty sure thats true, they need to go to prison for it.
youcrazy91 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you an idiot? Saddam's atrocities were fully funded by the U.S. Chemical, military, torture etc. And after that, for some unknown reason Hussein became "an utterly vicious dictateor" who had to be removed?
~
Don't you realize how subjective term "good" is? Anything that is good for you might be an opposite for the others?
~
Did you ask iraqi's whether they wanted your so-called "democracy" for the price of over one million dead?
~
Don't you feel that Iraqi's got literally "terrorised"?
pplayer666 3 years ago
STOP TALKING SO MUCH
randall172 3 years ago