if genesis says all people were of 1 language, then the modern scholarly concept of "proto indo-iranian" culture is a BUNCH OF BUNK. just like the big bang contradicts G-d as the "existing one" YHVH who always has existed and always will.big bang makes NO SENSE at all. Carbon dating is the main pillar of modern scholastics in evolution. its also HIGHLY UNRELIABLE.
in the end everyone will listen to the type of person his spirit is attracted to. and end up with the worldview he is worthy of...
What a load of bullshit. If you allow any vowels to be used interchangeably, if you allow all bilabials to be used interchangeably; if you allow random elisions, clippings and insertions of phonemes and syllables; and if you consider this a valid attempt at reconstructing a proto-language, you have no idea whatsoever about how language change works. With such loose "rules", any two languages can be shown to be "related". Complete, utter bullcrap.
Just saying "the evidence is overwhelming" doesn't make it so.
Of course, now I need to back up my claim that "any two languages can be shown to be related". So there: google "How likely are chance resemblances between languages?" for an article by M. Rosenfelder.
I still call bullshit. The parameters invoked here are so wide and unsystematic (both of which go against the comparative method) that they can be applied to any two languages. The statistics in that article prove it.
@Bizarrepetroglyph You're technically correct - merely saying something doesn't make it so. Were it not for your vehement denunciation of Mozeson's work, it might be possible to think you're trying to be objective. But because of your vehemence and insults, I can't believe that objectivity is your goal.
What is it about Edenics that evokes such rage in you and others? A rhetorical question, the answer to which is too well known.
If you have truly objective critique, share it with Mozeson.
@Bizarrepetroglyph Thanks for the tip. Interesting results - mostly doubletalk bouncing between the poles of the postmodern nihilistic-relativistic dichotomy.
Still - In what way can the "resemblance between languages" be explained?
Mozeson's is the simplest (but not simplistic) answer.
It might help if you were to read his books, sift through the several thousand examples he and his colleagues have documented, and communicate your thoughts in a more professional way.
@Bizarrepetroglyph Ahhhh... bullshit = blah it + shh it defined as; meaningless talk and please be quiet. Thanks for the confirmation addition to Mozeson's great work!.
why do you think theres only 30 million jews and 7 billion drones ? cuz most nations are serving a lower spiritual being than the creator. thats why their language, culture and thinking are twisted and the original perfect way has been diluted and distorted. the study of Isaac Mozezon shows this very well. modern universities are indoctrination bunkers for masonic "enlightenment", and you graduate with a "mortarboard" on the head. then you wonder why you cannot understand the obvious.LRD HV MRCY
This is complete nonsense.
ArrakeenSandChigger 4 months ago
if genesis says all people were of 1 language, then the modern scholarly concept of "proto indo-iranian" culture is a BUNCH OF BUNK. just like the big bang contradicts G-d as the "existing one" YHVH who always has existed and always will.big bang makes NO SENSE at all. Carbon dating is the main pillar of modern scholastics in evolution. its also HIGHLY UNRELIABLE.
in the end everyone will listen to the type of person his spirit is attracted to. and end up with the worldview he is worthy of...
bluemarkus 6 months ago
What a load of bullshit. If you allow any vowels to be used interchangeably, if you allow all bilabials to be used interchangeably; if you allow random elisions, clippings and insertions of phonemes and syllables; and if you consider this a valid attempt at reconstructing a proto-language, you have no idea whatsoever about how language change works. With such loose "rules", any two languages can be shown to be "related". Complete, utter bullcrap.
Bizarrepetroglyph 1 year ago 2
@Bizarrepetroglyph
The only bullcrap is your babbling accusations.
The evidence is OVERWHELMING and growing every day.
Isaac Mozeson is to be commended for his devotion to this important work.
BobMartin5613 1 year ago
@BobMartin5613
Just saying "the evidence is overwhelming" doesn't make it so.
Of course, now I need to back up my claim that "any two languages can be shown to be related". So there: google "How likely are chance resemblances between languages?" for an article by M. Rosenfelder.
I still call bullshit. The parameters invoked here are so wide and unsystematic (both of which go against the comparative method) that they can be applied to any two languages. The statistics in that article prove it.
Bizarrepetroglyph 1 year ago
@Bizarrepetroglyph You're technically correct - merely saying something doesn't make it so. Were it not for your vehement denunciation of Mozeson's work, it might be possible to think you're trying to be objective. But because of your vehemence and insults, I can't believe that objectivity is your goal.
What is it about Edenics that evokes such rage in you and others? A rhetorical question, the answer to which is too well known.
If you have truly objective critique, share it with Mozeson.
BobMartin5613 1 year ago
@Bizarrepetroglyph Thanks for the tip. Interesting results - mostly doubletalk bouncing between the poles of the postmodern nihilistic-relativistic dichotomy.
Still - In what way can the "resemblance between languages" be explained?
Mozeson's is the simplest (but not simplistic) answer.
It might help if you were to read his books, sift through the several thousand examples he and his colleagues have documented, and communicate your thoughts in a more professional way.
BobMartin5613 1 year ago
@Bizarrepetroglyph Ahhhh... bullshit = blah it + shh it defined as; meaningless talk and please be quiet. Thanks for the confirmation addition to Mozeson's great work!.
veeveevenn 1 year ago
why do you think theres only 30 million jews and 7 billion drones ? cuz most nations are serving a lower spiritual being than the creator. thats why their language, culture and thinking are twisted and the original perfect way has been diluted and distorted. the study of Isaac Mozezon shows this very well. modern universities are indoctrination bunkers for masonic "enlightenment", and you graduate with a "mortarboard" on the head. then you wonder why you cannot understand the obvious.LRD HV MRCY
bluemarkus 6 months ago