Added: 2 years ago
From: FukutenshiYoufan
Views: 241,692
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (724)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wish he were not a kurd he did bad job

  • There are a lot of Islamic Warriors/Commander in history. Some of their history is changed in other languages. But in Arabic we know their strong history: 1- Khalid bin alwaled (1st & best Commander in Islamic history) 2- Amro bin alas 3- Qutayba bin muslim 4- Fatih sultan mohammed 5- Salah addin ayyub 6- Alp arslan 7- Baibars 8- Saif addin qutuz 9- Uqba bin nafi 10- Mahmud alghazni 11- Musa bin nusayr 12- Yusef bin tashfin
  • buetiful song

  • no one no nothing in my school in also in our class about salahuin and now i told them about this great fighter he is like phatan

  • Salah ad-Din is a man who, while he was not one of twelve Imams, tried to emulate the Prophet in every way. And not just the Prophet but Imam Ali, Imam Hassan, and Imam Husayn in every way. He was a man of character and principle in an age where men had lost all principle and all character. Opponents of Islam say that Islam has always been a violent religion who's leaders ruled through bloodshed. I say, look at Salah ad-Din, look at Mehmed II, look at Ali ibn abi Talib.

  • @Killzoneguy117 These are not men who ruled through fear and oppression, they ruled through mercy and compassion. They ruled through honor, valor, truthfulness and respect, even towards their enemies. And yet scoundrels like Muammar Gaddafi, Osama bin Laden, Bashir Al-Assad, Ali Abdullah Saleh, Saddam Hussein, and Ben Ali dare to compare themselves Salah-ad Din and Mehmed II.

  • Another Salahuddin will come shall wipe these european out of the holy land !! It is and always has been muslim land !

  • @1newconcept No. We need Khalid Ibn Al Walid!

  • @tigerrc221 Khalid ibn Al Walid was a man for an age that required Militancy for Islam. That age has passed. That age passes 800 years ago after the last Crusade. Now, we need a man who was a diplomat, a chivalrous man, a man who could show the enemy that Muslims are not mindless savages through peaceful action and words rather than war. We need Salah ad-Din. And if not Salah-ad-Din, then Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib. Or literally any of the twelve Imams.

  • You dont care if he was kurd, turk or an arab? If he was a Turk or an Arab you would proudly present him as such. But he is a Kurd. From a nation that is nowadays being butchered by other muslims. If he was not seeing himself as Kurdish, how do we know that he was kurdish if he did not present himself as kurdish and a muslim?

    There were no records like today in the modernworld were we could check up eachothers information. If he never said he was kurdish history would not known him as kurdish.

  • @allforable i dnt think its just oil they r doing these dirty works for their pussy frds israel and wants them to have power all over the world but nonetheless my muslims brothers are fighting and kicking the amercians allover like in iraq and afghanistan bcoz u will never the word we won against these countries from an american

  • Hazrat Ali,Hazrat Omar,Hazrat Khalid bin Waleed,Salaudin Ayubi RAI,Tipu Sultan RAI, I wish u were here next to me!!!!!!The Ummah needs you!!!!

  • Türkiye - Ottoman Empires.

  • ISLAM IS BIG SHIT AND LIE! ISLAM=UNION OF TERRORISTS WITHOUT BRAIN OR IQ!

  • @XTadej It appears you are without a brain, too.

  • ISLAM IS STRONG. I HOPE HOLY WAR WILL HAPPEN AGAIN, SO I CAN JOIN IT. OR IF I CAN, I WANT TO BE NEXT SALAHUDDIN TO TEACH THE WEST HOW TO RESPECT OUR BELOVED ISLAM. ALLAHUAKHBAR !!! DEATH TO CHRISTIAN !!!

  • @10WalkerNight Why do you want to force people to respect islam? Respect is not something you take, it is something you earn.

  • @Northern85Star Rightly said Respect is something which is earned and cannot be forced and I being a muslim tell you that same applies to Islam. But I also want you to differentiate between Islam and muslims. Islam should be judged based on the Quranic teachings whereas the muslims should be judged according to their deeds. Yet I see many people blaming Islam just because some idiotic "so-called" muslims do disgusting things in the name of Islam. Islam cannot be wrong muslims can be...

  • @irshaad86 Problem is, all religions are good if perceived in such a way. I can judge Islam upon how it affect its followers. For example, i see no terror by buddhists or christians (i know there's a war, but 99% of westerners does not see it as a crusade, but a response to 9/11). So if there's terror done in the name of Allah, and it causes no revolt by the "true" muslims - then it is consent by silence. True muslims need to fight the wrong muslims, if what you say is true.

  • .. because THAT will earn islam respect!

  • @Northern85Star You judge Islam by the actions of muslims. and you get to know about those actions through media which sometimes are true and sometimes not. I and muslims like have always criticized actions which were wrong but they are never highlighted in mainstream media atleast the western media. Do you know when 9/11 took place, all major Islamic institutions reacted strongly against it but they were never shown in the mainstream media. Every country's media have their own interests..

  • @Northern85Star Western media tries to create a perception that all terrorists are muslims whereas in reality it is bullshit. According to FBI’s official website, 94% of terror attacks on America between 1980 to 2005 were done by non-muslims in which Jews contributed 7% nd right wing groups 24% compared to 6% muslims yet I notice the disparity in media coverage between them. You said 99% of westerners does not see it as a crusade. Well your very President Bush invoked God before invading Afghans

  • @Northern85Star I have seen many christians, I would rather call them Islamophobes as they equate present war on terror as crusade. When Breivik bombed and killed innocents, the headline of many newspapers were Islamic terrorists strike yet again without even confirming what the truth was. As soon as it became evident that this attack was carried out by a christian radical the newspapers and media houses simply stopped highlighting it...

  • @irshaad86 I'm scandinavian, and yes, media was fast to judge muslims because muslims is by far responsible for most terrorism (as it is defined). Media (atleast here) were just as quick to label Brevik a radical christian, so there were no doubt here. One of the reasons for this label, is that police have stopped many muslims with plans of terror in time - the latest was new years eve, where muslims planned killing people at JP, the paper responsible for the cartoons.

  • You have to remember, that terrorism is not merely sabotage or killing militants - it is killing innocents to instill fear. I have no recollection of non-muslim terrorism in recent time, except Brevik.

    What would really benefit non-militant muslims, is to counter demonstrate when people demonstrate for the implementation of sharia, where there's often very harsh messages towards non-muslims. Which in turn causes actions like Brevik or organisations like defence leagues.

  • @Northern85Star I clearly know what terrorism means. According to EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report(2007-09), a whopping 99.6% of terror attacks in Europe were by non-Muslim groups and still you don't know about any other terrorist attacks. Can I know the reason why? Well Media is the answer. Many muslims in Europe criticized radical muslims for their illogical acts. Do you really know what Sharia is? If you present me a version of Geert Wilder's Sharia or of any Mullah then I'm against it

  • @Northern85Star So are you trying to justify the acts of Breivik or the right wing organisations? Well these ignorant fools do make excuses for their own fallacy but common I don't expect this from a tolerant and civilized individual. Even the muslim terrorists justify their acts by speaking about West's imperialism and their occupation of muslim lands, creation of Israel etc. But does that wash away their sins? Probably not.

  • @irshaad86 Yes, the muslim individuals who become militant due to israel, and then want to break down western countries creates big tension in society, which is growing, due to a paranoia that most muslims consent by silence.

    I read the report, and the attacks i dont hear about are seperatist groups in Spain and France that have nothing to do with other countries. There have been many plans of terror stopped in other countries, due to the police being very keen on islamic groups.

  • .. but for example, the person that i commented on regarding respect - a true muslim should have responded back to him harsly, because his kind of messages gives all muslim a very bad image. But i never see that kind of reaction.. which leads to the conspiracy that muslims ultimately agree with those kind of messages.

  • @Northern85Star If you hadn't noticed I answered his misgivings immediately as soon as I saw it. But I agree that not many would do that i.e. criticize him for his comments but I don't think that means his views are shared by them. Its just that these fools should be ignored. Even I see many pricks insulting and badmouthing Islam and muslims and yet the tolerant non-muslims over here did not reprimand them.

  • @Northern85Star The western media like Jyllands-Posten's post insults Prophet Mohammad in the name of free speech to provoke muslims and some radical muslims behave in the most shameful manner and bring bad name to Islam. Criticizing and insulting are totally different. If I use foul language against you and then say that I was criticizing you. How would you react? Calling someone bastard in UK may be ok but if the same is said in India, it is offensive so you need to understand that...

  • @irshaad86 Ok, i think many does not know the real reason to the cartoons. A danish author wrote a childrens book on the life of Muhammed - it was not disrespectful at all - but there was a picture of Muhammed riding a horse in the sky, and there were some muslims who were outraged. So Jyllands Posten wanted to see challenge muslim tolerance and see if muslims believed islamic rules should be obeyed by non-muslims too... and then came the cartoons.

  • had muslims not reacted to the cartoons, it would have been a sign of tolerance and would have created respect. There would have been no reprinting of the cartoons. Instead, danish imams went travelling around the middle east with drawings (even fake ones) to create hatred. This is where the tension really began in Denmark, there were very little tension even after 9/11. We saw that at an American problem.

  • ... and for the record, i think the drawings were disrespectful - but the general muslim reaction was outrageous. Just like i think the creation of israel was one of the biggest mistakes of recent history.

  • @Northern85Star Well even I believed that the muslim reaction at some places were outrageous. I believe it all depended in the place you are. In my country India which has third highest muslim population in the world, the cartoon protests were peaceful but if you go to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq etc where people already had grievances against West, this cartoon act added more fuel to their hatred and so their acts went out of hand...

  • @Northern85Star The Danish author did it unintentionally so he was not wrong. But if some muslims did not understand this then they are wrong. But why did JP post these stuff? Well if their intention was to challenge tolerance then their were other ways to do so? Well a christian may not be offended when Jesus is insulted but how do you expect others to do the same. Muslims hold Prophet Mohammad at high esteem and insulting him would definitely cause furore...

  • @irshaad86 JP wanted to see whether danish muslims want to impose their laws on us, whether they share danish values (in the west, nothing is sacred in the name of comedy - especially not in Denmark). The answer was yes, we are by treat of violence forced not to make fun of the prophet. Actually, no one makes fun of islam or muslims at all, due to this treat.

  • I didnt notice you reprimand him sorry, but i am grateful that you are have a bigger perspective! Non-muslims don't reprimand people badmouthing islam because we honestly are confused at what islam is. There are many militant actions done in the name of islam, yet others say it is not islam... reading the hadiths, i understand the motive for militant actions, yet the koran alone shows a message of tolerance and peace.

  • @Northern85Star Thats allright, you don't need to be sorry. This is what I am trying to say, you are confused about Islam because you keep hearing of how evil Islam is through mainstream media. I saw many a times how Islamophobes are given so much air time on western media channels but I don't see these same channels present the views of others i.e. some one who can explain what Islam is all about.. You either see Wilders speaking about how bad Islam is or radical muslims killing and burning...

  • @irshaad86 The word of an islamophobe weights nothing compared to that of a radical muslim.. which are the people creating the islamophobes... and the islamophobes probably creates radical muslims.

  • @Northern85Star I believe that hate mongers of all religions are responsible for the present faith of this planet earth. Let the like minded people get rid of these idiots... It was nice speaking to you and I hope you have a great year... Cheers :-)

  • @Northern85Star Anyways thanks for your good words. Whenever I hear some muslim militant organisation killing and bombing, I am first person to get angry at this. What good are they doing to my people? Nothing.

    1. They are killing innocents.

    2. They bring bad name to my religion.

    3. They invite retaliation and that retaliation is again going to make the innocents suffer.

  • @irshaad86 Likewise friend! If moderate muslims oppose the radicals, and non-muslims oppose the islamophobes, we can avoid conflict and instead unite. :)

  • by "no one" i mean, no public figure.

  • @Northern85Star In the name of freedom of expression western media insults Prophet Mohammad but why is it illegal to deny holocaust in west. Why shouldn't there be a freedom for denying holocaust. Rules are meant to be equal for everyone but why is that not the case in West. Bullying a nerd could be fun and comedy for some people but will that nerd take that bullying in a good sense.

  • @irshaad86 Denying holocaust is only illegal if there is a racial motive - racism is illegal. Besides that, painting a cartoon and denying the historical fact of the death of over 6 million jews, gipsies and others are completely different things, don't you think?

    In your example, the nerd will have to tolerate it, because it is humor - it isn't serious. One of the Muhammed drawings even had an arabic message critisizing JP.

  • @Northern85Star You say it is a historical fact, it may be a fact but why are people not allowed to question it. Common you 9/11 conspiracy theories but its not a crime to question the official version but why is questioning holocaust a crime. Its because it hurts the sentiments of the victims. So if the sentiments of the jews are taken into consideration why not the muslim?? I saw a comedian who was criticized because he made fun of holocaust and he even received death threats...

  • @irshaad86 Because denying the holocaust almost always has a racist motive, why else would you deny something that is certain? I can send you photos if you want. I have grandparents who saw the jews in KZ camps at the liberation, and other who saw them being taken away in trains like cattle. Some non-jewish resistance fighters were also sent to kz-camps where they witnessed it. Denying tthe death of 6 million people and drawing cartoons can hardly be compared, can it?

  • @saifialig Common dude chill out... There are bad and good people every where.

  • @saifialig There is a difference between Zionists and jews. Please understand that...

  • @saifialig Holocaust is correct and Palestine is nothing compared to it sorry. Jews mass-immigrated to Palestine around WW2, creating settlements. They started arming themselves, creating the IDF, because they had already been negotiating with the british about the balfour declaration. This ofcourse led to hostility and attacks from muslim on the settlements (who wouldnt when people plan on taking your ground), and the violence was what made the decision final for the british.

  • So i do believe that the palestinians stuck first, but i think it's a very natural reaction. I think everyone would have reacted in that manner, it's human nature.

  • @Northern85Star and the one who made holocaust were christian... u fucked and u blind with it...

  • @TheOnlyCoolestGuy111 What is your point?

  • @Northern85Star u blind that ur own religion made fucked up this world, even tough your a jews

  • @TheOnlyCoolestGuy111 I'm not religious, so your point is invalid.

  • @Northern85Star your not religious ? Then ur LIFE IS INVALID

  • @TheOnlyCoolestGuy111 I'm pretty sure your god says, that only he can judge people. You better apologize to him for your rude behaviour.

  • @Northern85Star yep, but not now... i can judge u now... rude behaviour ? u deserve it mamals... u think that is right to not believe in ur creater, Allah SWT ? U think after u die u only sleep forever ??? Just like animals ??? In Islam u gonna be asked for what u have done in this world. If u still dont think about that then u deserve rude behaviour for that ! Just like animal u are

  • @Northern85Star oh yeah... FYI my god is also ur god... everyone god... theres only ONE GOD, ALLAH The Greatest... The creator of all, heaven and earth

  • @TheOnlyCoolestGuy111 Well, 5.5 billion people disagrees with you.

  • @Northern85Star Then prepare for to suffer, look at this world already

  • @TheOnlyCoolestGuy111 That is because mankind is still primitive, we still hold on to superstition regarding what we down know, just like cavemen. We have just organized those superstitions, which makes it easier to fight about. We still hold a tribal culture, with borders and nations - man-made lines all over the world. Get rid of those things, and we have much less to fight about. The last thing would be to get rid of the monetary system, capitalism.

  • @Northern85Star Primitive ? Then Allah the most gracious bless us with Quran for guide us to the right path and Prophet Muhammad SAW his way of life (AL HADIS) ?

    Why u didnt think about that ?

    Why Allah made guide from our own kind ? so we could understand what the purpose in this world ? not only live eat and die like an animal

  • @TheOnlyCoolestGuy111 That's the perception of 1.5 billion people, while 5.5 disagrees. I have a humble approach to what i don't know. I take an existenialist approach, meaning we live in a world which no apparant meaning, a world which isn't always fair - but people create their own meanings and mankind tries to create justice and fairness through legal systems, among other things.

  • ... this let's me strive for knowledge, to discover more about the essence of existence, so that mankind may reveal through proof whether life has purpose or we are the result of random chance. But i believe this question is the very last mankind will ever answer. I believe that IF there is a God, he follows no known scriptures and my human nature wants him to reward every good person. But that again is human wish for fairness in a seemingly unfair world.

  • @Northern85Star holocaust was a hoax

  • @yos1994 So Hitler was right?

  • @Northern85Star He wanted to free egypt from the British.^^ i dont have a problem with that. Germany was allied with Ottoman empire. I have no problem with Hitler ^^

  • @yos1994 I see where you're going. So Hitler uncovered the truth about the ashkenazi jews, but the Rothschilds of Britain and USA were too wealthy and funded the war engine that let to the downfall of nazism. The victor writes history, which is why holocaust was invented and nazism stigmatized as pure evil. That must be why they're called ashkeNAZI jews.. :b

  • @Northern85Star Its all a part of The zionist idea of world domination

  • @yos1994 I don't like zionism or the Rothschilds either - due to that they are simply too influential, but that doesnt make holocaust a hoax. There are thousands of witnesses still alive today, EVEN german soldiers. Google Einsatzgruppen, for example. It's very possible that there a lots of exaggerations about holocaust, but it definitly DID happen.

    The question is whether you agree with the reasons for holocaust or not.

  • @Northern85Star They are all actors my friend. The real 1ns might be the polonians that was killed pre to the war or during the war. The holocaust was under 1 million.

  • @yos1994 So I guess the rest of the 5 million disappeared, right? You are an embarressment to the human race. Fuck you.

  • @MrBigBEARHUNTER what other 5 million? They never existed. 6 million jews emigrated from germany before ww2. Go do research before coming here and confronting me with manstream bullcrap please.

  • @yos1994 Really? Nazi war veterans admit that there six million, idiot. In 1938, the nazis chased jews out of Germany, and into Poland. Then invaded.

  • @MrBigBEARHUNTER Sources or gtfo.Idiot you got weak information from national geographic channel which is why you are defending the jews. You stupid moron do more research than prove my facts wrong.

  • @yos1994 Sourses? Theres sourses and videos all over the internet about the holocaust.

  • @MrBigBEARHUNTER ever heard of actors? Are you fammilar with that word? Im not gonna debate the holocaust with you. If you want real information on it search the internet, and search in a way that dont favour you

  • @yos1994 Nazi war trials are not acting, you asshole.

  • @Northern85Star Drawing cartoons can be trivial issue for you but not for the muslims as Prophet Mohammad in his will wished that he shouldn't be portrayed physically. Even movies made on him did not have his character played. So it is painful for us muslims when some one tries to insult a revered figure in Islam..

  • @irshaad86 That is clear, but it must never come to violence - even if he is portrayed by non-muslims. Non-believers cant and shouldnt be forced to live under the laws of all other religions. Then again, there would be no reason to draw the cartoons to begin with, had there been no reaction to the first. There would have been much less cartoons around than there is now (on youtube for example), due to the anti-islamic icon those cartoons have become.

  • @Northern85Star Yes it shouldn't have resulted in violence, Technically you may be right in saying non-believers cant and shouldnt be forced to live under the laws of all other religions but isn't respecting other's sentiment a moral duty. When you know that certain action may be atrocious to others then why do them but then JP and other media outlets were insensible towards it, They maliciously did it on purpose.

  • @irshaad86 You're absolutely right, it was insensible and malicious and most non-muslims agree on that aswell. It is not a duty though, to respect others. An extreme example would be, if hindus said that muslims have to respect the cow, and not eat it, because it is holy to them. Is this the case in india?

  • @Northern85Star Well it depends on the perspective of an individual in a society where you live. In Europe, respecting other's sentiment may not be a duty but in my country, it is indeed a duty. I can illustrate this with the same example you have given me. Cow is holy to most of the hindus. Keeping this in view many a times muslims don't slaughter cows just so to not hurt the feelings of their compatriots. I share my flat with some hindu friends and I avoid eating beef just not to hurt them...

  • Comment removed

  • @10WalkerNight Salahauddin NEVER wanted to bring death to christians instead his first option was always peace that is the reason he and his religion was respected by even his sworn enemies...

  • @10WalkerNight death to chritsian.. Salahudin never preached this.. when king richard 3rd fell ill, salahuddin sent him medics.. its about principle and belief.. many christiansactually majority respect muslims and vice versa.. saying death to chritians and then saying u want to be salahuddin.. please.. u r oman in way too low to achieve his greatness

  • I AM SALAHUDDIN. I WARN TO ENEMY OF ISLAM TO STOP THEIR CRUEL ON MUSLIM OR THEY ALL WILL REGRET IT.

  • Oh Allah send another Sallahadin to us agin, we need him

  • Comment removed

  • @zayihe "do you know wether this hadith is sahih or not? most of muslim will say this hadith come from unreliable source"

    Of course they will.

    "ISLAM is not racist"

    The words are there for all to read.

  • Song name?

  • yes i know he was kurd but is not important where hes come from important thing he was hero muslim.

  • what is the song pleas??

  • Comment removed

  • @Oyrad58 You are a complete idiot if you think racism was "invented by the west", people invented racism, not a select group of people.

  • i am muslim and i am proud

    you r christian and you r proud

    he is jewish and he is proud

    we r human and we r proud

    earth is enough for all of us ...

    peace is my greeting and its my message

    PEACE,,,,,

  • no need this silly music

  • Next time choose other song....

  • Those people who become Muslims, it is not a CONVERSION but in fact it is a REVERSION. Don't forget that every human being is born as a MUSLIM.

  • we miss u salahuddin ( the real hero of islam

    )

  • BRAVE MUSLIM COMMANDER

  • A MUSLIM IS A believer in the one god we r not trukish knower do we want to be arab natiolist we r muslims black and white and brawon we r one the west has injicted us with rascism we need to rise back we need an islamic state undivde couse we serive the same GOD amen

  • Rascism comes from the west? Muslims are just as human as Westerners. It is human nature to be rascist and destroy one another. The residual animalistic predation that resides within the human sub-conscious is the root of this. We all strive to be higher than others. So don't fool yourselves by taking stance on some false moral high ground. In the end Muslims are just as backward as Westerners. We are all branches of the same tree. The same termite infested tree....

  • today we need 1 more sulah ud deen...

  • @sohail5360  ...and Europe needs one more Adolf Hitler to clean the house!

  • @railboy77 Hmmmn

  • i really really really really wish sometimes that we had Hazrat Ali ra, Hazrat Khalid bin Walid ra, Hazrat Umar ra, Salahudin Ayubi rehmutallah, Tipu Sultan rehmatullah and all major muslim generals in this day and age with us!!!I wish they were here..here next to us..i dont know abt others but i miss them!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Yuh ulan Selahattin Eyyubiyide arap yaptılarya 40bin haclını karşısında bozguna uğrayanlar araplar kudusü kaptıran araplar bide kalkmış Türk oğlu türk Selahatin dedemizi arap yapıyorlar.Arap olduğundan oğlunun ismi Turanşah arap ismi ya. kkardeşinin ismide Börte oda arap ismi ya.

  • Racism Comes From The Western my muslim Brothers

  • @MichaelMyerSick Ask your self why! Search for the video - EXECUTION - Islam murders a young mother! 

  • anyway he was russian.

  • Oh, I have an idea! Everyone shut the fuck up and watch the video! : )

    Done? Congratulations, you're officially half a brain smarter.

  • OMG everyone talking about genetics, races.. etc...

    Salahaddin was great commander of all muslims! his army was made up by arabs, turks, kurds etc.

    hey muslims, our ancestors were not racists, racism invented by west. now i see that racism infected muslims. dont forget that its forbidden for our religion. you can love your nation , country, people, but dont be racist. we came from earth, and we will turn back to earth.

    greetings.

  • @Oyrad58 Say that to the arab/muslim slave trade.

  • @KingAfro88

    The "Arab/Slave" trade wasn't what you think and the general know it to be.

    Watch this lecture by Abdullah Hakim Quick, his lecture is on the topic.

    /watch?v=h5gJ4e0bV1o

  • @Oyrad58 yes your ancestors were racist look at the arab caliphate at around 7-8 century waging holy war against the christian populace and converting the rest against their free will

  • @nemurad

    Converting people against their will ?

    No one was forced to convert , the biggest proof is that jews lived in Al-Madina with Muslims

  • @DrKMaTaaDoR where are they now?yeah terminated.

  • @msam67 No , they we're kicked out after breaking the truce repeatedly , """kicked out"" not slaughtered

  • @nemurad im a Turk :)) not an arab.

  • @Oyrad58 (Hadith, Mishkat ul-Masabih, translated by Karim, v. iii, p. 117): "Abu Darda reported that the Holy Prophet said: Allah created Adam when he created him. Then He stroke his right shoulder and took out a white race as if they were seeds, and He stroke his left shoulder andtook out a black race as if they were coals. Then He said to those who were in his right side: Towards paradise and I don't care. He said to those who were on his left shoulder: Towards Hell and I don't care."

  • @MegaTech09 Hadith, Mishkat ul-Masabih, translated by Karim, v. iii, p. 117: "Abu Darda reported that the Holy Prophet said:"

    It is clear who reportedly said that.

  • @Oyrad58 No one should love their nation and think theres is better than anothers. Nationalism is haraam, all the so called "Muslim" nations should join up together and form a caliphate and implement shariah law. By doing that racism would diminish and all the nations infrastructure, trading, economy, power will increase so much. The West divided us, it is up to us to get back together and form a great Ummah.

  • @Oyrad58 Coming from a people that enslaved blacks before white men did that is priceless.

  • @ZackFairBMT Think again, islam permits owning slaves - it's in the koran (although, you have to treat them well). Slavery wasn't banned in the Ottoman empire up until the 19th century

  • @EmilReiko I know, human empathy and moral has evolved beyond any religon, atheism is our common ground, and the only way to make earth a bit more peaceful for us all.

  • @UltraEpicLoser Atheism is defined as a lack of belief, so no, you cannot have faith in any god.

    Atheism will make all wars based upon religion go away, our religious identity has no purpose. Thus a world of atheist would be better than a world of different religions - or even one religion (as even different branches of islam is fighting each other). Atheism is the future.

  • @Northern85Star Atheism is the lack of belief in a God. Religion is a set of doctrines and beliefs, morals and values. So if you follow a "code of honor" that is your religion. You can change the word or delete it but people will still have values, morals and a belief system. Even an atheist can have morals and a code they live by. Buddhism is a religion, it is also atheistic. Buddhists do not believe in a God.

  • @UltraEpicLoser But one key aspect to religion, is that it is defined as having a public image, because it's moral and values are absolute - to islamists, throwing homosexuals off of mountains will always be morally right, even if some feel sorry for them. To the atheist, moral and ethics are reasoned and argued to. And that is exactly the point: because values are not absolute to the atheist, there's no point fighting for them.

  • By the way, many buddhists do believe in gods - you're referring to the philosophical branches of buddhism.

  • @Northern85Star Same thing can be said about theists then. Theism is not a religion. The view points of atheism can be manipulated too. If you look at Stalin and his regime, he went after the religious and hurt a lot of people. He even threatened the educated, he used his power and reasoned the torture of these people. It is not religion that is harmful, its is us, the individuals that can manipulate anything, for our own goals. Stalin manipulated through fear and reason the things that he did.

  • @UltraEpicLoser You have to understand, that unlike people of different beliefs, atheists do not create groups, organisations or similar, so there is no public image. I agree that it is human nature that creates pain upon others, but religion gives them reasons to do it. You see, the human is expert at creating group mentality, and group mentalities are exactly why conflict erupts. We need to stop identifying ourselves as christian, muslim, jew, black or white - but simply human.

  • @Northern85Star Kaliph Abu bakar RA banned it during his reign.....

  • @Northern85Star true, i take that back, but the way the west enslaved the black people is different to how Muslims did,we did not torture them-we are not ALLOWED to torture them even...

  • @saifialig Examples of what exactly? :)