This man died on august 19th 2008 under mysterious circumstances after he had given an interview for a BBC documentary about building 7( a `documentary´which - as they couldn´t change the eye witness´statements - was cut in a very misleading way, so that viewers who didn´t pay attention got the impression, the explosions he had heard were a result of the collapsing towers, although he had mentioned before that the towers were still standing when he finally could get out of building 7)
. . . the NIST director has determined that certain evidence . . is voluntarily provided . . not directly related to the building failure . . and that disclosure of that information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information.
In other words: they aren't telling you all of their information. Only what they feel like. We can't check their work because they're not providing us with all of their information.
This man died on august 19th 2008 under mysterious circumstances after he had given an interview for a BBC documentary about building 7( a `documentary´which - as they couldn´t change the eye witness´statements - was cut in a very misleading way, so that viewers who didn´t pay attention got the impression, the explosions he had heard were a result of the collapsing towers, although he had mentioned before that the towers were still standing when he finally could get out of building 7)
heimaheiner 3 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
NIST's WTC 7 report disclaimer No. 3:
. . . the NIST director has determined that certain evidence . . is voluntarily provided . . not directly related to the building failure . . and that disclosure of that information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information.
In other words: they aren't telling you all of their information. Only what they feel like. We can't check their work because they're not providing us with all of their information.
Criminal investigation.
bobbygnosis 3 years ago 4