Sony Kapoor is wrong about people avoiding taxes by setting up financial accounts in tax havens. U.S. citizens and residents are taxable on their worldwide income. There is tax deferral for active business income until the money is brought back into the U.S. -- i.e., income from active business operations in a foreign country. But, there is no tax deferral on the types of passive investment income about which he speaks.
Isn't the FTC supposed to regulate abuse of financial transactions?
I had respect for TRNN with some other videos that I saw, but this seems like a bleeding heart agenda. Why do we want to burden honest people because of the crooks?
Do you guys realize that taxes are revenue for the govt which is a business model in itself?
They should be penalized for running the govt like they do. More bureaucrats mean more problems. More taxes hurts our economy.
In a global economy where everyone is competing against everyone else for limited resources, a limited number of jobs, and a limited amount of prestige, influence, and status abuses will be the norm, not the exception. Frankly if you examine much of the ethnic conflict that exists around the world you will find that the majority of these clashes are rooted in economic inequality between groups of people. Global capitalism doesn't just lead to abuse, it can lead to barbarism.
By believing regulation always works? Yea look how the fed regulated the money supply to their advantage and there cronies only devaluing the money of everyone who is saving and living within their means...!
Now imagine a congressman in control of this money supply. Do you not think he would use it to get re-elected?
I am not saying all regulation is bad, there is no absolute in any argument.
Look up the history of larry summers and president clintons relationship.
i.e. "If this loan fails, we agree to give you money, AND we are charging enough money for this insurance to actually pay it out"
Then giving them a AAA rating would be appropriate.
Unfortunately, credit default swaps, unlike all other forms of insurance, were completely unregulated. Especially on the issue of being required to hold enough reserve capital to actually pay out claims.
Exactly, but those CDO's would have, without the AAA rating, failed to attract prospective buyers, thus the rating agencies played a fundamental role in the credit crunch of 08-? Peace
wow .. what this guy summed up up to 2:49 is exactly what i've been thinking but no one has put it into exact words till now... i guess everyone that can think can expect that to happen.. very sad shit
Globalization is hurting everyone, and I mean here in the USA and elsewhere.
In a fantasy world, all countries should prohibit borrowing for what I call 'Money for Money' transactions. Only those borrowing transactions that generate products or services should be allowed.
However, we live in the real world and Nationalism is a joke to the Financial Moguls.
They don't want to own one country, they want them all and have the resources to do it.
US makes about $1.4 trilllion in tax revenue. The federal budget is $2.5 trillion. Most of the budget goes to paying interest on US treasuries 75% held by the FED. All our taxes goes to the FED.
Taxing markets is not a way to recover anything, because the revenue doesn't go back to the people. In a fractional banking system goverments use taxes to borrow money from cetnral banks. How about we get rid of fractional banking where banks have to lend out maoney they actually have.
Just get rid of personal income tax. The more money gov gets the more havoc it causes. Small gov means small taxes. The progressive mindset is that those who earn are obliged to support those who don't. And the only way they justify this ignorance is some skewed sense of morality. It's wrong now, and has always been wrong.
I agree, that would essentially eliminate tax havens.
People talk about getting more taxes, or we need more money, but they rarely talk about decreasing spending. With the perpetual spending increases. There's little point in talking about taxes (as they will have to go up indefinitely) unless you talk about spending.
Well the "progressive mindset" is that money gained from speculative banking (i.e. Gambling) is not as worthy of compensation as money gained through providing goods and services.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The progressive mindset is that what others earn should not be theirs to spend or save as they see fit. Banking is the red herring. Banking is not the free market.
No, the "progressive mindset" is that if you're a leeching middleman, then you're not actually EARNING a DAMNED THING.
Investment and raising capital are important and valid parts of a functional market, but without tight regulations, speculators and other scum will suck money out without contributing to the productive economy.
Must have been a bitter pill for US citizens to learn that the prime tax haven globally is neither Monaco, the Bermuda or Virgin Islands nor the dreaded Swiss vaults. It´s Delaware, USA.
There's no question that the tax code is filled with bullshit that allows those (who can bribe congress) to avoid taxes.
The solution isn't taking it out on those of us who invest/trade, and pay our fair share. The solution is simplification of the tax code so that a) an ARMY of intelligent people (lawyers/acctnts) don't spend LIFETIMES scheming to avoid taxes (a waste of productivity), b) everyone REALLY DOES pay their fair share.
Ramonet was not the first to notice the problem of international finance .....
"The fight against international finance and loan capital became the most important point in the program of the German nation's struggle for its economic independence and freedom."
Having the ability to punish those who caused the crisis would take getting passsed the hordes of people who enjoyed the party and their employees...The truth to tell, liars can say it all just as well and are very well rewarded for their lies... They honestly know that they work much harder a do more for the world than anyone else...who else would build the monuments to their achievements
The Tobin tax would be extremely counterproductive because it would kill the trading volume in the products where it's implemented. This would eliminate intraday trading, which does NOT have a significant impact on the magnitude of bubbles. In fact, sometimes it can reduce intraday volatility. Destroying trading volume decreases value because investors prefer investments they can dispose of quickly. This is why private corporations trade at a significant discount to public corporations.
There is no place for statesmen any more. People are too busy to think, too destracted to care and too fat and lasy to act.. Inorder for anyone to do something about this corporate Government is first to care and then stop eating the Garbage its producing. We are not obese because we are worried about who.
- Continued from previous comment -
It is illegal to set up an offshore account and fail to report investment income, like he is suggesting people do all the time.
I also disagree with his general theme of taxing the economy to death.
TaxMaverick 1 year ago
Sony Kapoor is wrong about people avoiding taxes by setting up financial accounts in tax havens. U.S. citizens and residents are taxable on their worldwide income. There is tax deferral for active business income until the money is brought back into the U.S. -- i.e., income from active business operations in a foreign country. But, there is no tax deferral on the types of passive investment income about which he speaks.
TaxMaverick 1 year ago
My favorite part of the interview was the last line where paul jay says "it all seems rather obvious so now lets talk about why its not being done."
aaa10247 2 years ago 2
Paper money has the effect to ruin commerce,oppress the honest, and open the door to every species of fraud and injustice ~GEORGE WASHINGTON
ttj1776 2 years ago
Isn't the FTC supposed to regulate abuse of financial transactions?
I had respect for TRNN with some other videos that I saw, but this seems like a bleeding heart agenda. Why do we want to burden honest people because of the crooks?
Do you guys realize that taxes are revenue for the govt which is a business model in itself?
They should be penalized for running the govt like they do. More bureaucrats mean more problems. More taxes hurts our economy.
wealthmentor 2 years ago
GOLD & SILVER COINTS BETTER THAN RATES
DAV93 2 years ago
In a global economy where everyone is competing against everyone else for limited resources, a limited number of jobs, and a limited amount of prestige, influence, and status abuses will be the norm, not the exception. Frankly if you examine much of the ethnic conflict that exists around the world you will find that the majority of these clashes are rooted in economic inequality between groups of people. Global capitalism doesn't just lead to abuse, it can lead to barbarism.
blackiron60 2 years ago
You cannot regulate fraud.
PersianPaladin 2 years ago
I think american regulators giving toxic assets AAA ratings proves regulation doesnt always work you know.
martinaoe2 2 years ago
I've been to a rodeo, a picnic and a world fair and that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
You need to go back to your high school and demand that you be better prepared to go out into the world.
CollateralSandwich 2 years ago
By believing regulation always works? Yea look how the fed regulated the money supply to their advantage and there cronies only devaluing the money of everyone who is saving and living within their means...!
Now imagine a congressman in control of this money supply. Do you not think he would use it to get re-elected?
I am not saying all regulation is bad, there is no absolute in any argument.
Look up the history of larry summers and president clintons relationship.
martinaoe2 2 years ago
@martinaeoe2
Except that th reason those AAA ratings happened is because of TOTAL DEREGULATION of credit default swaps. (aka Loan Failure Insurance)
greyfalcon. net/ cds3
greyfalcon. net/ cds
And those Ratings were issued by entirely private ratings agencies.
greyfalcon. net/ cds2
If anything, that's evidence that regulation is required.
Especially when it comes to insurance markets.
greyflcn 2 years ago
@grey
I didnt know that, I thought they were a gov agency, honestly.
Could you give me a name of one of those private agencies you speak of as I would like to know alittle more.
Thanks, I like your movie. I wish they could punish these people for fraud to send out a clear signal to people who do this.
What is your view on the federal reserve? do you think there inflating of the economy perpetuated this bubble and are the root cause?
martinaoe2 2 years ago
@martinaoe2
Well there's lots of rating agencies.
But some of the more well known ones in the US are Standard&Poor, and Moody's
wikipedia. org/ wiki/Credit_rating_agency
As for the Federal Reserve.
I agree that it's bad.
But I take the Kucinich approach, rather than the Paul approach.
The Federal Reserve should be a federal program.
As is implied by Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution.
Congress shouldn't be outsourcing it's control of money to a secretive private entity.
greyflcn 2 years ago 2
Yup, and these rating companies just say it was their OPINION (and nothing more) that these toxic assets were AAA.
hiphopsocnroc 2 years ago
@hiphopsocnroc
Well if the Credit Default Swaps were REAL.
i.e. "If this loan fails, we agree to give you money, AND we are charging enough money for this insurance to actually pay it out"
Then giving them a AAA rating would be appropriate.
Unfortunately, credit default swaps, unlike all other forms of insurance, were completely unregulated. Especially on the issue of being required to hold enough reserve capital to actually pay out claims.
greyflcn 2 years ago
Exactly, but those CDO's would have, without the AAA rating, failed to attract prospective buyers, thus the rating agencies played a fundamental role in the credit crunch of 08-? Peace
hiphopsocnroc 2 years ago
wow .. what this guy summed up up to 2:49 is exactly what i've been thinking but no one has put it into exact words till now... i guess everyone that can think can expect that to happen.. very sad shit
zayadnay 2 years ago
Globalization is hurting everyone, and I mean here in the USA and elsewhere.
In a fantasy world, all countries should prohibit borrowing for what I call 'Money for Money' transactions. Only those borrowing transactions that generate products or services should be allowed.
However, we live in the real world and Nationalism is a joke to the Financial Moguls.
They don't want to own one country, they want them all and have the resources to do it.
topthickproducer 2 years ago 2
The answer is to move away from banks creating their own fiat currency.
agentj001 2 years ago
US makes about $1.4 trilllion in tax revenue. The federal budget is $2.5 trillion. Most of the budget goes to paying interest on US treasuries 75% held by the FED. All our taxes goes to the FED.
agentj001 2 years ago
Taxing markets is not a way to recover anything, because the revenue doesn't go back to the people. In a fractional banking system goverments use taxes to borrow money from cetnral banks. How about we get rid of fractional banking where banks have to lend out maoney they actually have.
agentj001 2 years ago
National boundaries are a barrier to free trade.
Who, but a criminal, a thief or an ignorant slave wants more taxes and more regulation.
Like someone here said, if spending is not addressed, then talking about taxes is futile.
Like talking in favor of socialized medicine(healthcare) and ignore the importance of war.
First things first.
asperin 2 years ago
Just get rid of personal income tax. The more money gov gets the more havoc it causes. Small gov means small taxes. The progressive mindset is that those who earn are obliged to support those who don't. And the only way they justify this ignorance is some skewed sense of morality. It's wrong now, and has always been wrong.
bbburton 2 years ago
I agree, that would essentially eliminate tax havens.
People talk about getting more taxes, or we need more money, but they rarely talk about decreasing spending. With the perpetual spending increases. There's little point in talking about taxes (as they will have to go up indefinitely) unless you talk about spending.
sirellyn 2 years ago
@bbburton
Well the "progressive mindset" is that money gained from speculative banking (i.e. Gambling) is not as worthy of compensation as money gained through providing goods and services.
greyfalcon. net/ teddy
greyflcn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The progressive mindset is that what others earn should not be theirs to spend or save as they see fit. Banking is the red herring. Banking is not the free market.
bbburton 2 years ago
No, the "progressive mindset" is that if you're a leeching middleman, then you're not actually EARNING a DAMNED THING.
Investment and raising capital are important and valid parts of a functional market, but without tight regulations, speculators and other scum will suck money out without contributing to the productive economy.
psychoholicmike 2 years ago 9
Fuck you asshole
rickbar123 1 year ago
You must have heard that from your father as he was ramming his penis up your ass.
bbburton 1 year ago
ps- your fucking stupid
rickbar123 1 year ago
You must have heard that from your mother as she was watching your father ram his penis up your ass.
bbburton 1 year ago
hahahaha
big talk over yt
rickbar123 1 year ago
Must have been a bitter pill for US citizens to learn that the prime tax haven globally is neither Monaco, the Bermuda or Virgin Islands nor the dreaded Swiss vaults. It´s Delaware, USA.
XD!
0PsycoDad0 2 years ago
Kapoor looks good with this non-corporate unshaven look. i'm straight.
mrzack888 2 years ago
Yes, it is "good for the majority of people" to take money from the minority.
Is it fair?
GetMeThere1 2 years ago
If the majority has money taken from them and the minority doesn't it is.
evacuationplanb 2 years ago
There's no question that the tax code is filled with bullshit that allows those (who can bribe congress) to avoid taxes.
The solution isn't taking it out on those of us who invest/trade, and pay our fair share. The solution is simplification of the tax code so that a) an ARMY of intelligent people (lawyers/acctnts) don't spend LIFETIMES scheming to avoid taxes (a waste of productivity), b) everyone REALLY DOES pay their fair share.
GetMeThere1 2 years ago
It´s legal and THAT´s an issue to be dealt with
0PsycoDad0 2 years ago
Ramonet was not the first to notice the problem of international finance .....
"The fight against international finance and loan capital became the most important point in the program of the German nation's struggle for its economic independence and freedom."
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Ch. 8
flimflamman 2 years ago
Godwin's law!
evacuationplanb 2 years ago
Having the ability to punish those who caused the crisis would take getting passsed the hordes of people who enjoyed the party and their employees...The truth to tell, liars can say it all just as well and are very well rewarded for their lies... They honestly know that they work much harder a do more for the world than anyone else...who else would build the monuments to their achievements
laurasIs2c 2 years ago
*****
ubuibiok 2 years ago
The Tobin tax would be extremely counterproductive because it would kill the trading volume in the products where it's implemented. This would eliminate intraday trading, which does NOT have a significant impact on the magnitude of bubbles. In fact, sometimes it can reduce intraday volatility. Destroying trading volume decreases value because investors prefer investments they can dispose of quickly. This is why private corporations trade at a significant discount to public corporations.
bfq3000 2 years ago
I like Sony, he's a good addition to the RealNews.
MarquisdeBarrabas 2 years ago
There is no place for statesmen any more. People are too busy to think, too destracted to care and too fat and lasy to act.. Inorder for anyone to do something about this corporate Government is first to care and then stop eating the Garbage its producing. We are not obese because we are worried about who.
btigtime2 2 years ago