The UN Security Council should reform so that one nation's vote would not veto a decision supported by the majority of the Council's members. Divide the veto power by half, or make the veto a matter of majority, so that it would take at least 3 or more nations agreeing with one another before a decision, such as setting up a no-fly zone over Libya, would not be vetoed so easily
The entire premise of UNSC is that the major victors of WW2 got to carve up the world into their own security spheres of influence. If it was based on majority, then Western countries would not have the authority from the UN to invade anyone. The smaller, yet more numerous countries will simply challenge it, and win :D
The UN Security Council should reform so that one nation's vote would not veto a decision supported by the majority of the Council's members. Divide the veto power by half, or make the veto a matter of majority, so that it would take at least 3 or more nations agreeing with one another before a decision, such as setting up a no-fly zone over Libya, would not be vetoed so easily
TheVoiceOfReason93 10 months ago
@TheVoiceOfReason93
The entire premise of UNSC is that the major victors of WW2 got to carve up the world into their own security spheres of influence. If it was based on majority, then Western countries would not have the authority from the UN to invade anyone. The smaller, yet more numerous countries will simply challenge it, and win :D
Phead128 6 months ago