@tonyg0123 Great Idea!! I can't understand why the hell we Repubs/Conservatives are limited to this weak ass field, we have superstars in the GOP that would wipe the floor with obummers ass!!
Allen West - Marco Rubio - Eric Cantor, Just to name a few!!
@pianomanroc ya, good choices, I would also like Mike Pence or Jim DeMint as president. As a veteran, I gotta say I currently like Ron Paul. He makes the most sense to me although he is probably 180 degrees from Allen West on foreign policy. The rest of them seem like they have flip-flopped on basically every issue. With these 4 current canidates it's almost like the GOP is not even trying to defeat Obama. Something tells me the game is rigged...hmmm? lol
@uncircumcisedCH0DE You live in a drug riddled world with unicorns and homo boys running around!! Plus you cannot put together a coherent sentence!! Dear God help us!!!!
Also, Clinton worked directly with Newt and they passed a lot of good legislature so of course he'll praise Newt based on his accomplishments but I have a hard time making the connection that Savage has made where he thinks Clinton doesn't think Newt is electable. Savage is a pathological distortionist.
Savage is an ass. Being obese doesn't mean you're not too poor to eat. I worked in downtown Sacramento and there's plenty of hungry homeless people. Some look like they're starving.
Back in 2008, Michael Savage would preach about the need for smaller government, respecting and defending the Constitution, etc, and then he would turn around and bash the most small-government, most defender of the Constitution in Congress, Ron Paul.
Coincidentally, 2008 is when I stopped listening to Michael Savage.
@pianomanroc It's easy to do a search on here to find videos of Savage bashing Paul for all sorts of things. ...and then, later, he sometimes would praise Paul, and then, later, bash Paul. Savage is a schizo flip flopper.
S Myrick NC, Ron Paul TX, P Roe TN, B Posey FL, C Mack FL, T McClintock CA, R Labrador ID, T Huelskamp KS, T Johnson IL, W Jones NC, A Harris MD, T Graves GA, John Duncan, JR TN, Jeffery Duncan SC, J Campbell CA, J Chaffetz UT, J Amash MI, Rand Paul KY What a pitiful record...18 out of 535 members of Congress are on your side 100% of the time in the 112th Congress (Freedom Index 8-8-11 sans those who voted for ndaa)
U tube vid's. RP Puts Rep.Establishment Supported Propaganda Lobbyist in their place. See vid's 4 yourselves: "Ron Paul Educates McCain" (atleast from 1:00-1:35), ***"Ron Paul Pwns Sean Hannity after the latest Fox News debate" (during Seans own Debate), along with: ""Intelligence Officer: Ron Paul Is Right on Iran", "Breaking News Ron Paul "NOT" the author of "racist" newsletters", "RON PAUL: Why Blacks & People Of Color Should Vote For Him", "A black man's view on Ron Paul being racist
Savage is a lying Hypocrite. All Savage has been doing for last 3yrs is complaining about how Obama is turning this into a socialist nation with his marxist friends and now he is saying all he cares about is an incoming missle. Not to mention Savage has been whinning about being banned from England. Boo hoo. Savage is a worthless piece of SHIT!
@pettyofficer30 The fact that he would ever consider voting for Romney which is the republican equivelent of Obama... Ever wonder why the democrats haven't launched any attacks on Romney???
Nope Romney better hide in a cave if he thinks his electible. Newt, well Mr. Savage would now better then I how unelectible he is. Back to flip flopper Romney, satan himself (Bush) senior is endorsing him. Funk that. RON PAUL, BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!
White House used Mitt Romney health-care law as blueprint for federal law , When it comes to government-mandated health care, there is no difference between Mitt Romney and President Obama,” R-D =SAME
@vic4rp you people choose to believe liars but not those who tell the truth. time and time again Romney has said the plan they passed in MA is only design for their state not federal gov't. they didn't have to raise tax in MA, just moved money around. Obama had to raise tax and cut medicare for his federal mandate plan. how are they the same plan? please don't spread stupidity. people are already so dumb.
@ElJefer What numbers? He lost in Iowa, he'll lose in New Hampshire, he'll lose in South Carolina, he'll lose in Florida, etc. Where's the electability? All he can do is when small time straw polls and caucuses...
@MrGreenPoop1000 He got second place in New Hampshire, hardly unelectable. But if you keep watching the mainstream media, maybe you can convince yourself that he's in 3rd or 4th
@ElJefer It's about wins and losses. He's going to lose 4 in a row in a few short weeks (Florida included). He even said that he'll only be focusing on the minor caucuses that no one else will hardly campaign for.
He's not as bad as Huntsman, but he has little chance of being the nominee (unless all the candidates happen to die).
@MrGreenPoop1000 You also have to consider delegates and percentage of people who wake up to the fact that Romney is essentially the same as Obama. It's hard to predict, but unelectable does not follow from the percentage of voters who like Ron Paul and the crossover he has displayed.
lol savage...I wanted to like him, but he just lost respect with me....lets not support Newt because typically hardcore leftists would never vote for him.
I mean Savage is entitled to his opinion, but who the hell is he to throw his money around and try to interfere with process.
@Alexn1067 because Michael cares about America. Republican leaders know Romney is the most electable going against Obama. that's why Republican establishments are endorsing Romney. The most important thing to Conservatives should be preventing an Obama re-election. They're flirting with disaster playing this stupid anybody but Mitt game. Gingrich is a great debater but that doesn't mean he can beat Obama or even be a leader. his record is that of a failure like Obama.
@dhom100 I think you give Obama waaaayyyy tooo much credit....I think anyone who has thought this through....would say that either Gingrich or Romney would fair well against obama....look at the polls....really I think too many republicans are given to panic
@Alexn1067 not at all. I think Obama could be the most incompetent President ever in the history of our country. he's a good public speaker but not much else. what Obama has that the Republicans don't is the support of the media which is very useful. If conservatives could buy out all the media networks, then I wouldn't worry so much. this election is too important. It needs to go to the best candidate we have. smart people know Mitt is the real deal.
@Alexn1067 I agree and it is running its course. but bothers me that a lot of Republican voters are dumb enough to believe what the media is saying about Romney.
don't they know that libs control the media? libs don't want Obama vs Romney because then the election would be about failed economy vs ideas to fix it. Obama vs Gingrich means young handsome president vs old washed-up fat wife cheater. only Romney has a clear detailed plan to fix the economy. he knows exactly what to do.
@dhom100 I don't really find credence in your depiction of Gingrich. If things were fine and dandy then yes, trivial things like Gingrich's age might have more of a priority with the voters....however...Obama has been so horrible I think people won't care so much about Gingrich's age and weight, that is of little importance when you have a super power in a tailspin and horrific economy. When you're hungry you tend not to be as picky about how your food looks
@Alexn1067 your logic would be valid if most American see it as you do. I'm not that
optimistic about the intelligence of the average American voters. I'm with Savage on this, I think the years of brainwashing perpetrated by the liberal media have made people too dependent on the media. they believe what they're told. I think appearance is very important on influencing how people vote. it sticks in people's minds. how do you think JFK got elected?
@Alexn1067 then why didn't the established candidate won? by your logic, Nixon should've won. it's been documented and even admitted by Nixon himself that JFK won because he looked better on t.v. you can support the phony Newt Salamander if you want but my prediction is that the best candidate will win and that is Mitt Romney. of all the GOP candidate, he looks the most Presidential. even libs would admit to this.
@dhom100 like I said, back in 1960 the U.S. economy was strong, people were amply employed, Today it is quite the opposite, when people are hungry their priorities tend to be more in order that means looks matter less. Yes the best candidate will win thanks to the process. But when people try to skip the process and inject their pre-mature judgment...it does the process a disservice. Let the process carry out in that way we will get the best man for the job
@Alexn1067 how can anybody skip the process? talking about differences in each candidate and people showing support for who they think is best is all part of the process. spreading lies about the candidates like what the liberal media are doing about Romney and sabotaging the primary--that's what's ruining the process.
@dhom100 my whole point all along was that is what precisely Savage was doing by trying to entice Gingrich to leave...ultimately Gingrich is a big boy who knows when to go to bed.
like I said, let the process go through undisturbed....if Romney turns out to win the nomination, which there is a good possibility of that happening...I'll gladly vote for him over Obozo. I would feel the same way if Gingrich were to win. I like them both.
@Alexn1067 Making this offer to Gingrich is for publicity. Savage knows Gingrich wouldn't take it. he'd be a fool to do so. still there's nothing wrong with it. Michael is just making his argument, that's his constitutional right as a citizen. as long as people aren't spreading lies to support or attack certain candidates, arguments are ok. I don't like Gingrich at all base on his failed record, arrogance, and infidelity. Romney has fresh ideas for real change we need to fix the economy.
@pianomanroc You're probably right. But only because the people don't deserve him. They are lazy, stupid and deceived. America was founded as a constitutional republic, Now it is a socialist-fascist country. The people have no idea that most of their elected officials are traitors by definition. Many are even blatant criminals. The people whine and complain but they don't want to learn the law and how their government is selling them into slavery. Learn the real law not the BS "rules."
Wait. Do we go around waiting to see what an inner city person would vote for? They wouldn't vote for Romney either or Palin or Reagan. Geez these Beck/Savage folks are getting kooky.
Newt 2012. People Might not be hungry for food.....YET but we are getting closer to that day and everyone knows it, this is why NEWT has a good chance.
You want to know why this nation is going down the drain? Listen to what Savage just pointed out, accurately I might add: Romney's better looking...
There is two decent candidates in the GOP field that are smart, have integrity and are knowledgeable on the country's situation, Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman. Yet this clown is suggesting Romney because "he's better looking". they are actually the only two capable of beating Obama by bringing the indy vote, the polls prove it. Stop being dumbar$es!
Its simple to me. Newt has disgraced himself many times over several decades. He's paid over $300,000.00 in fines. He's been an INSIDE SHILL for huge corporations. He has been a corrupt politician his whole life. Most importantly his appetites are more important to him than the USA or its citizens. Simply put Newt is a CROOK. He should have gone to prison. It is idiotic to help him get onto the GOP ballot. Our nation is in DEEP trouble. GINGRICH IS NOT THE ANSWER
Governor Donny Osmond of Massachusetts may be a douchebag, but if he in the long-run has the best chance of winning, he has my support 1000%. It is very disheartening that by the time of the New York Primary, House Speaker Nikita Khrushchev may very well have the nomination wrapped up. He may do better than Sarah Palin, but that's like comparing Mondale's defeat to Dukakis'; one may not lose as badly, but a loss is a loss is a loss. If this wimp gets reelected, the USSA is in dire straits.
I can answer your question for you michael that the caller couldn't.Clinton is praising newt not because he thinks newt is easier for Obama, but because clinton is a political mischief maker and he knows his endorsement could do newt some harm amongst republican voters.He knows all about gingrich sitting with pelosi how that could harm gingrich and he is playing on it. Think deeper about it michael. You are not a stupid man so I do wonder if you are playing the media game as well....
This long TOOTH bastard says that, "Romney cares more about National Security than Obama."
Seriously, I shouldn't have to go here;
Somali Pirate
Ghadaffi
Mubarak
Al-Qaeda's #2 Man.....and the number 1 threat to the United States "National Security" Osama Bin Laden!
You clowns can say what you will about Obama and disrespect all him you want, but you can't get these terrorist to talk shit about him.They're literally scared to death of the man.
@dhom100 Trust me on this, but you're absolutely correct! These ppl. vote for certain members of their party as if they're rooting for a sports team. No matter how fucked-up the candidate is, they'll still support him them and take their word as the Gospel. It's like they're brainwashed.
Again, you're right about the media playing 'two ends' against each other. The old "DIVIDE AND CONQUER."
Obama was the best thing to happen to America for a long time ...it is waking up American's. Bush was taking us on a cruise ship slowly, Obama same direction same ship but on steroids.
Gingrich is the worst possible choice to run against Obambam. Another cronie capitalist and corrupt career politician, bought and paid for by corporate lobbyist.. And cheating on all 3 wives? If a man can't be trusted with loyalty to his loved one's, will he not betray my friendship also? Say one thing, but do another? Nevermind the moral issue, common sense throws a huge red flag! Running this bloated tic will only hand the election to Obambam.
Unfortunately, in this world where the superficial trumps the substance, appearance is half the battle, and in that sense Gingrich loses big time to Obama. However, it should be noted that Herman Cain, which has been Savage's favorite, thus far, is hardly any better. So if electability has a lot to do with appearance both Cain and Gingrich are out. Who does that leave? Romney. It's an unfortunate choice, but in terms of electability, in a shallow electorate, he has the best stage presence.
If Obama is electable...who the hell isn't??? The presidency is nothing more than a friggin popularity contest. My country is a joke. One giant mass of stupidity.
@GrandFunker The student council elections at my school are more mature and educated than this attack ad/smear campaign war between an elephant and a donkey.
@GrandFunker George W Bush was the epitomy of a white male American, and yet he got elected 2x. Savage is way off on this one. I fully agree with you.
@abaskcasckbackj I don't know about way off...there are a lot more blacks, especially poorer inner city ones who may have never voted before who did and will again for Obama. My neighborhood is mostly black, and in the days before election day, there were Obama operatives all over the place here. Registering people to vote and handing out fliers explaininng the whole "right to vote" concept. I think Newt can beat Obama, but it will definitely take some work.
@GrandFunker I hear what youre saying, bit here is my point again: If Obama ran against Gingrich, the blacks who voted for him would not increase, would stay the same most likely. Against Gingrich 90-10%. Cain at best would get 30% of the black vote, where as hed lose a cnsiderable greater amount of whites than Ginrich would lose from the black vote.
I subscribe to liberal shows too. Ron Paul is the favored candidate on the left as well as the right. He appears to be the most electable for either side.
Progressivism / Liberalism / Keynesian Statism advocates change or reform through GOV'T action.
Give ANY politician or bureaucrat power to "redistribute & regulate" OTHER people’s money & choices and they will ALWAYS benefit THEIR “special interest” campaign backers; Financial-Industrial Complex, Military-Industrial Complex, Marxist Unions, Giant "Green" Corps, Big Oil, Pharma, Insurance etc.
Statism = Corrupt Political Cronyism.
Fed’s FIAT (counterfeit) debt-currency FUELS THE FIRE!
Ron Paul is NOT-Electable....even if you agree with him...people will NOT vote for him he looks like a tired, beat up, Old white guy from the South...Newt is very smart but a phony conservative, he beleives in immigration reform!!! Perry was my pick but he dumbed down in that debate...Cain is good but as a Treasury or Defense Secretary....As long as OBAMA is OUT..i really dont care..
@akrivosdiavolos73 thats the problem. obama is the same as bush, republicans same as democrats. there all the same. obama gave us obamacare bush gave us prescription drug program, they both gave us bailouts, wars all over the place. fox news makes you think theres a difference but there really isnt
@tillman40 no. msnbc does it for the democrat , and fox does it for the republican. and most of us fall for it like there really is a difference. both msnbc and fox hate ron paul though...that says alot
I like the way this caller turned Michael savage with his petty compliment on dems and repubs working together. Savage went from calling him an idiot to sending him a book!
1. Savage's analysis of the Bill Clinton endorsement assumes that Clinton wants Obama to win a second term . . .
2. Newt Gingrich is much improved over his 1996 self, but he still has enough combativeness to put up a good fight, which is sorely needed this time. Romney has been on both sides of every issue, and he practically stutters whenever he's confronted about it. Newt can take control of the debate.
3. All of Savage's points are a strong argument for Herman Cain. LOOKS matter.
@EconomicLiteracyNow If looks matter, then how in the hell is Cain going to appeal to the vast white majority in this country? he LOOKS ans SOUNDS like a bumbling idiot. If you want a polished appearnce as well as an articulate speaker, the candidate from Utah is pronbably the best of both worlds (John Huntsman), but wont win.
Mitt Romney is fucking terrible, and Newt Gingrich is another false conservative. Ron Paul is a true conservative. Mitt Romney is a flip flopper, I can't believe that Savage supports him. He should know better.
Newt Romney or any other candidate except for Ron Paul they are just a bunch of war mongering scum. The only guy that doesn't flip flop is Dr. Paul. No scandals with Dr.Paul. I'm sick of the war mongerers and want peace. and sanity in foreign policy.
NEWT will lose savage was right urban areas and independent voters will not flock to him are u people fuckin crazy?.ROMNEY maybe. Ron Paul is a better choice then both those guys I really wanted Cain but he's damaged his run is over so I'm goin with Paul the libertarian conservative
Savage makes a decent point, but I do believe Gingrich could tear apart Obama better than Romney can. And since when did Obama look presidential? That lanky, ugly, huge-eared bastard. I think that what Savage is saying is you have to be 'not-white' to be elected nowadays, because it's associated with Bush who the Libs despised. I'm not sure.
I think Gingrich would make Obama look like a laughingstock, and it should be easy, Obama's been a HORRIBLE president.
@Illumirage Obama is horrendous, horrible and unqualified but Newt Gingrich will be the same kind of president.
They are both globalist sock puppets. He supports carbon credit schemes, believes in the global warming fraud, NAFTA, GATT, he's written the forward to a book supporting socialism saying it's the best third way. He's horrible, as a conservative.
We don't need globalists like Obozo, Clintongue or Newtick - we need Dr. Ron Paul to cure the private Fed infection.
I agree with you 100%, however thats not his point. We all know that Gingrich can eat Obama alive, the problem is the lemings that fallow Obama would never jump ship for him, or Ron Paul.
Arguable...you're kind of right. I'd like to see Newt take on Obama face to face. It would be interesting to say the least. Newt seems to have the best presence of mind in debates.
But the part you're right about is that the Libs, whether Obama gets verbally fisted in the ass by Newt or not will claim victory by spinning it to suit their needs. And all the Jon Stewart audience member dipshits will lap it up without thinking twice.
@Illumirage Excluding Ron Paul...If any of these other fools get elected you will get the same monster wrapped into the same package and the end result will be the same...dig deep into their backgrounds and you see that they share the same affiliation with a certain powerful organization.
You're just speculating on most of that. When in actuality many of the stances they take are the polar opposite of that of Obama & Co. And a Ron Paul supporter has no credibility in my book. Sorry, enabling methheads and blaming America for Islamic terrorism (on America) isn't my picture of competent leader. Ron Paul is a Liberal.
@Illumirage Excluding Ron Paul...If any of these other fools get elected you will get the same monster wrapped into a different package and the end result will be the same...dig deep into their backgrounds and you see that they share the same affiliation with a certain powerful organization.
@Illumirage The problem with Savages argument is he seems to implay that black-inner city folk vote at a high percentage. I dont recall W getting those votes either. Blacks make up 13% of the populace. Why cant Newt get 10% and win????? Seems quite easy considering the moron and failure hed be running against.
@Illumirage you people are all morons. what makes you think you're all smarter than Michael Savage. he's absolutely right about Gingrich being unelectable. the liberals are trying to sabotage this Republican primary. just look at all the attack Romney ads. at the same time, they're praising Gingrich. that' helps him with the polls. I promise you elect anybody but Romney and we have 4 more years of Obama.
As much as I despise this clown, Savage, he is definitely a true jester. He called Leroy a " old, fat white man." LOL
What is a "Old fat white man?" Some fat bastard who stands in his yard wearing a WIFE BEATER T-SHIRT, eating POTTED MEAT and yelling, "get off my damn grass?
@Illumirage How old are you, 8? Why should I care if some you-tube character "don't like me?"
Just respond to my comment about Leroy "tearing apart Obama," or, view the POTUS ripping the republican congress asshole apart. That's really all the proof I need.
Even Leroy's own party doesn't like him. The same goes for Willard. Now you have Trump exposing these clowns as a bunch of circus freaks!
Btw, not that I'm a Jon Stewart fan, but I have seen him "tear FOX NEWS apart!" LOL
Why do you insist on calling people by names they don't go by?
He meant just that (old, fat white man). Not some character from the film 'deliverance'.
Were you sitting in the crowd when Jon 'ripped them Fox news apart? After all, Stewart is notorious for harboring about the dumbest crowd on television (or maybe The View). Add to that the fact that he takes a bunch of chopped up soundbites & uses them out of context. Yeah, real clever, inventive stuff there Jon.
Don't bother. whiteliberal1 is a notorious troll here. All he does is pick fights, then he will go on continuously insulting you while ignoring anything that you happen to say, regardless of how factual or accurate. Best thing to do is completely ignore him. He gets off on pointless argument.
I should have known that going in, anyone who touts the fact that they're a liberal is a little off their rocker from the get-go. When in actuality the moniker 'liberal' is something of a badge of shame....
I'm not even sure which speech you're referring to. What does it matter, Obama doesn't rip anyone a new one, he gets ripped a new one by everyone, because he has done maybe one thing right since he took office. Your liberal president is a complete hack.
Jon puts up a fight when he's on O'Reilly, he never wins though.
@moviesforrandy Gingrich wrote the forward for a book "Creating a New Civilization" by Alvin and Heidi Tofler, who are "ex" Marxists and "futurists" that Newt calls friends. "The Constitution of the United States needs to be reconsidered and altered.....The system that served us so well must, in its turn, die and be replaced. "-- Sure sounds like UN Agenda 21 to me! Learn about it before you vote!
Ironically his book is named Abuse of Power yet he refuses to see the abuse of power America exerts over smaller nations. If Savage was really worried about national security, he'd support a candidate that wants to bring the troops home and quit antagonizing other countries to attack us by occupying their country. You can call him "Ron crazy Paul" all you want you neocon shill, but we are on to your bitch ass Savage. Ron Paul 2012!
Savage is an idiot! Gingrich is a bought and sold piece of trash. Romney puppet just like Obama and the only one who can do the next right thing is RON PAUL!
@KingDingaLing090 bitch this asswad!..public channel lets me be capable of expressing myself. what the fuck is your issue king dumb ass?... You want Gingrich I wanna divorce while youre dying ass as President? Are you serious? So what is his foreign policy....(tapping foot) same as the ass hole that is there now. Military wife sick to death of taking our poor to go and kill their poor, are we clear? Or are you too busy using your lack of communication skills to get off your dead ass?
@MsJustanotherhuman Why don't you comment intelligently about the video? Instead you and a dozen other people just said "RU PAUL 2012!" I am sick of you. Shut the hell up. You are going to plaster your stupid slogans on every political video until the elections anyways, so fuck it, I am going to do the same thing to you.
@Illumirage Me 2. And look at this bastard below with his rant on hunger in America. His proof that Americans are starving is this direct quote: "Feeding America is annually providing food to 37 million Americans, including 14 million children. This is an increase of 46 percent over 2006, when we were feeding 25 million Americans, including 9 million children, each year." <---- Look at how retarded this person is!! His proof that children are starving is a fact that we are feeding them! LOL
I dont care anymore .. have it your way .. you will find out how your going to die du to ndaa or sopa or just obama trying to fuck your mamma
..or maby you like it that way... i dont even know how i responded to such a stupid video anyway .. fuck savage fuck newt fuck you ....k by
alicia4buchanan 3 hours ago
Newt?
a guy who has been through like 5 marriages must have a pretty fucked up view on the meaning of life.
LOL no woman especially would even think for a second about voting for Newt.
glasspig 1 day ago
Comment removed
glasspig 1 day ago
who would vote for newt ginrich? that fat old troll
thehotsixer 2 days ago
RON PAUL 2012
NeoConNation 4 days ago
Allen West 2012 ...write in
tonyg0123 1 week ago
@tonyg0123 Great Idea!! I can't understand why the hell we Repubs/Conservatives are limited to this weak ass field, we have superstars in the GOP that would wipe the floor with obummers ass!!
Allen West - Marco Rubio - Eric Cantor, Just to name a few!!
pianomanroc 2 days ago
@pianomanroc ya, good choices, I would also like Mike Pence or Jim DeMint as president. As a veteran, I gotta say I currently like Ron Paul. He makes the most sense to me although he is probably 180 degrees from Allen West on foreign policy. The rest of them seem like they have flip-flopped on basically every issue. With these 4 current canidates it's almost like the GOP is not even trying to defeat Obama. Something tells me the game is rigged...hmmm? lol
tonyg0123 2 days ago
Newt is electable.
DartmouthAlum96 2 weeks ago
Michael is dick sucking Zionist rat.. He knows it he would sell out to liberals any day
uncircumcisedCH0DE 3 weeks ago
@uncircumcisedCH0DE You live in a drug riddled world with unicorns and homo boys running around!! Plus you cannot put together a coherent sentence!! Dear God help us!!!!
pianomanroc 2 weeks ago
@uncircumcisedCH0DE Yeah because he sells out to your coward ass kind every day!! You fucken racist liberal piece of rat shit nigga!!
pianomanroc 2 days ago
FUCK SAVAGE GO RON PAUL 2012 BITCHES
cathunter79 3 weeks ago
ron paul same message 30 years. see him if u can
TheGoat1954 3 weeks ago
Sux but I have to agree.
TakeDetour 3 weeks ago
Sad, but painfully true. People don't give 2 shits about principles or debates.
Fox News highest ratings are about 1% of the population, and they lead in news channel ratings.
Romney probably has the right ideas, but knows they don't fly politically so he's painting himself as more Liberal.
LibertyDownUnder 3 weeks ago
Savage just loves to argue. It doesn't matter who it's with.
VitalSigns1 3 weeks ago
Anyone is better than Osama!
I'll even vote for Shawn Paul.
crusaderforever 4 weeks ago
basically he cares about israel, yea national security bullshit
MusicIzMySavior 4 weeks ago
God damn FUCK RON PAUL
BMunich16 4 weeks ago
@BMunich16 No f u
DizziNY1 2 weeks ago
@DizziNY1 No, fuck you.
BMunich16 2 weeks ago
Herman Cain, the nominee that Michael Savage was endorsing, is now endorsing Newt. I wonder if Michael Savage will change his mind lol.
JudeCJV 4 weeks ago
Also, Clinton worked directly with Newt and they passed a lot of good legislature so of course he'll praise Newt based on his accomplishments but I have a hard time making the connection that Savage has made where he thinks Clinton doesn't think Newt is electable. Savage is a pathological distortionist.
motox3rider13 4 weeks ago
Savage is an ass. Being obese doesn't mean you're not too poor to eat. I worked in downtown Sacramento and there's plenty of hungry homeless people. Some look like they're starving.
motox3rider13 4 weeks ago
@motox3rider13 Wow go smoke another joint and try to come up with a better, more coherent sentence!
pianomanroc 2 days ago
Newt 2012
artifact98 1 month ago
Back in 2008, Michael Savage would preach about the need for smaller government, respecting and defending the Constitution, etc, and then he would turn around and bash the most small-government, most defender of the Constitution in Congress, Ron Paul.
Coincidentally, 2008 is when I stopped listening to Michael Savage.
WesSeid 1 month ago
@WesSeid Please reference one time with evidence to back it up when Michael did this!
pianomanroc 2 days ago
@pianomanroc It's easy to do a search on here to find videos of Savage bashing Paul for all sorts of things. ...and then, later, he sometimes would praise Paul, and then, later, bash Paul. Savage is a schizo flip flopper.
WesSeid 2 days ago
0:08 to 0:11 - powned
paulffraser 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
S Myrick NC, Ron Paul TX, P Roe TN, B Posey FL, C Mack FL, T McClintock CA, R Labrador ID, T Huelskamp KS, T Johnson IL, W Jones NC, A Harris MD, T Graves GA, John Duncan, JR TN, Jeffery Duncan SC, J Campbell CA, J Chaffetz UT, J Amash MI, Rand Paul KY What a pitiful record...18 out of 535 members of Congress are on your side 100% of the time in the 112th Congress (Freedom Index 8-8-11 sans those who voted for ndaa)
possumpistol 1 month ago
RP 2012
zoomee65 1 month ago
Well as far as the ham goes if I don't get dinner then why the hell do i care about a missile blowing me up for if i cant eat any way!
The85matt1 1 month ago
U tube vid's. RP Puts Rep.Establishment Supported Propaganda Lobbyist in their place. See vid's 4 yourselves: "Ron Paul Educates McCain" (atleast from 1:00-1:35), ***"Ron Paul Pwns Sean Hannity after the latest Fox News debate" (during Seans own Debate), along with: ""Intelligence Officer: Ron Paul Is Right on Iran", "Breaking News Ron Paul "NOT" the author of "racist" newsletters", "RON PAUL: Why Blacks & People Of Color Should Vote For Him", "A black man's view on Ron Paul being racist
rob80nikki 1 month ago
Savage = Israel Firster.
BassmanSW 1 month ago
Savage is a lying Hypocrite. All Savage has been doing for last 3yrs is complaining about how Obama is turning this into a socialist nation with his marxist friends and now he is saying all he cares about is an incoming missle. Not to mention Savage has been whinning about being banned from England. Boo hoo. Savage is a worthless piece of SHIT!
truthout911 1 month ago
SAVAGE YOU IZ A BITCH WEST SIDE FOOL 107 HOOVER CRIP
cathunter79 1 month ago
savage = tool = fake conservative
StigRossi 1 month ago
Just lost a lot of respect for mike.... sad day
jakeslife79 1 month ago
@jakeslife79 Point?
pettyofficer30 1 month ago
@pettyofficer30 The fact that he would ever consider voting for Romney which is the republican equivelent of Obama... Ever wonder why the democrats haven't launched any attacks on Romney???
jakeslife79 1 month ago
@jakeslife79 Romney is electable. Gingrich is not. Savage is right.
MrGreenPoop1000 1 month ago
Nope Romney better hide in a cave if he thinks his electible. Newt, well Mr. Savage would now better then I how unelectible he is. Back to flip flopper Romney, satan himself (Bush) senior is endorsing him. Funk that. RON PAUL, BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!
wisefulone 2 months ago
Ron Paul 2012
swazymaq 2 months ago 2
Not even Romney can tell the difference between himself and Newtered.
watch?v=fz8grUP19O8&
Ron Paul 2012
FreedomsReigning 2 months ago
White House used Mitt Romney health-care law as blueprint for federal law , When it comes to government-mandated health care, there is no difference between Mitt Romney and President Obama,” R-D =SAME
vic4rp 2 months ago
@vic4rp you people choose to believe liars but not those who tell the truth. time and time again Romney has said the plan they passed in MA is only design for their state not federal gov't. they didn't have to raise tax in MA, just moved money around. Obama had to raise tax and cut medicare for his federal mandate plan. how are they the same plan? please don't spread stupidity. people are already so dumb.
dhom100 2 months ago
Ron Paul 2012
ElJefer 2 months ago 16
@ElJefer Ron Paul SUCKS! He's UNELECTABLE! Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional!
MrGreenPoop1000 1 month ago
@MrGreenPoop1000 Keep telling yourself that, I bet the media agrees with you, but numbers say otherwise
ElJefer 1 month ago
@ElJefer What numbers? He lost in Iowa, he'll lose in New Hampshire, he'll lose in South Carolina, he'll lose in Florida, etc. Where's the electability? All he can do is when small time straw polls and caucuses...
MrGreenPoop1000 1 month ago
@MrGreenPoop1000 He got second place in New Hampshire, hardly unelectable. But if you keep watching the mainstream media, maybe you can convince yourself that he's in 3rd or 4th
ElJefer 1 month ago
@ElJefer It's about wins and losses. He's going to lose 4 in a row in a few short weeks (Florida included). He even said that he'll only be focusing on the minor caucuses that no one else will hardly campaign for.
He's not as bad as Huntsman, but he has little chance of being the nominee (unless all the candidates happen to die).
MrGreenPoop1000 1 month ago
@MrGreenPoop1000 You also have to consider delegates and percentage of people who wake up to the fact that Romney is essentially the same as Obama. It's hard to predict, but unelectable does not follow from the percentage of voters who like Ron Paul and the crossover he has displayed.
ElJefer 1 month ago
@ElJefer Ron Paul, never going to happen.
MaxamillianArturo 1 month ago
@MaxamillianArturo Keep telling yourself that, evidence shows that such a bold prediction is unwarranted.
ElJefer 1 month ago
@ElJefer Well, you'll be saying something different in November.
MaxamillianArturo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MaxamillianArturo Well, you'll be saying something different in November. See what I did there? I can make claims without evidence too
ElJefer 1 month ago
@ElJefer Ron Paul sucks.
thejimmyzshow 1 month ago
damm jew dont know shit, damm you ugly jew
scarynight63 2 months ago
lol savage...I wanted to like him, but he just lost respect with me....lets not support Newt because typically hardcore leftists would never vote for him.
I mean Savage is entitled to his opinion, but who the hell is he to throw his money around and try to interfere with process.
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 because Michael cares about America. Republican leaders know Romney is the most electable going against Obama. that's why Republican establishments are endorsing Romney. The most important thing to Conservatives should be preventing an Obama re-election. They're flirting with disaster playing this stupid anybody but Mitt game. Gingrich is a great debater but that doesn't mean he can beat Obama or even be a leader. his record is that of a failure like Obama.
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 I think you give Obama waaaayyyy tooo much credit....I think anyone who has thought this through....would say that either Gingrich or Romney would fair well against obama....look at the polls....really I think too many republicans are given to panic
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 not at all. I think Obama could be the most incompetent President ever in the history of our country. he's a good public speaker but not much else. what Obama has that the Republicans don't is the support of the media which is very useful. If conservatives could buy out all the media networks, then I wouldn't worry so much. this election is too important. It needs to go to the best candidate we have. smart people know Mitt is the real deal.
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 mitt is a good choice, he isn't the only choice. and I think its best to let the nomination process run its course
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 I agree and it is running its course. but bothers me that a lot of Republican voters are dumb enough to believe what the media is saying about Romney.
don't they know that libs control the media? libs don't want Obama vs Romney because then the election would be about failed economy vs ideas to fix it. Obama vs Gingrich means young handsome president vs old washed-up fat wife cheater. only Romney has a clear detailed plan to fix the economy. he knows exactly what to do.
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 I don't really find credence in your depiction of Gingrich. If things were fine and dandy then yes, trivial things like Gingrich's age might have more of a priority with the voters....however...Obama has been so horrible I think people won't care so much about Gingrich's age and weight, that is of little importance when you have a super power in a tailspin and horrific economy. When you're hungry you tend not to be as picky about how your food looks
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 your logic would be valid if most American see it as you do. I'm not that
optimistic about the intelligence of the average American voters. I'm with Savage on this, I think the years of brainwashing perpetrated by the liberal media have made people too dependent on the media. they believe what they're told. I think appearance is very important on influencing how people vote. it sticks in people's minds. how do you think JFK got elected?
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 the country was in much better shape when JFK got elected....
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 then why didn't the established candidate won? by your logic, Nixon should've won. it's been documented and even admitted by Nixon himself that JFK won because he looked better on t.v. you can support the phony Newt Salamander if you want but my prediction is that the best candidate will win and that is Mitt Romney. of all the GOP candidate, he looks the most Presidential. even libs would admit to this.
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 like I said, back in 1960 the U.S. economy was strong, people were amply employed, Today it is quite the opposite, when people are hungry their priorities tend to be more in order that means looks matter less. Yes the best candidate will win thanks to the process. But when people try to skip the process and inject their pre-mature judgment...it does the process a disservice. Let the process carry out in that way we will get the best man for the job
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 how can anybody skip the process? talking about differences in each candidate and people showing support for who they think is best is all part of the process. spreading lies about the candidates like what the liberal media are doing about Romney and sabotaging the primary--that's what's ruining the process.
Romney
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 my whole point all along was that is what precisely Savage was doing by trying to entice Gingrich to leave...ultimately Gingrich is a big boy who knows when to go to bed.
like I said, let the process go through undisturbed....if Romney turns out to win the nomination, which there is a good possibility of that happening...I'll gladly vote for him over Obozo. I would feel the same way if Gingrich were to win. I like them both.
Alexn1067 2 months ago
@Alexn1067 Making this offer to Gingrich is for publicity. Savage knows Gingrich wouldn't take it. he'd be a fool to do so. still there's nothing wrong with it. Michael is just making his argument, that's his constitutional right as a citizen. as long as people aren't spreading lies to support or attack certain candidates, arguments are ok. I don't like Gingrich at all base on his failed record, arrogance, and infidelity. Romney has fresh ideas for real change we need to fix the economy.
dhom100 2 months ago
Ron Paul
alicia4buchanan 2 months ago 19
@alicia4buchanan RON PAUL WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT!! YOU FUCKING DRONES GET OVER IT!!!
pianomanroc 2 weeks ago 4
@pianomanroc bravo
tom9154 1 week ago
@pianomanroc yes He will you dumb fuck.
alicia4buchanan 3 days ago
@alicia4buchanan Hahaha such an impressive argument!! Perfect example of a mindless Paul bot you are ma'am! ;)
pianomanroc 2 days ago
@pianomanroc You're probably right. But only because the people don't deserve him. They are lazy, stupid and deceived. America was founded as a constitutional republic, Now it is a socialist-fascist country. The people have no idea that most of their elected officials are traitors by definition. Many are even blatant criminals. The people whine and complain but they don't want to learn the law and how their government is selling them into slavery. Learn the real law not the BS "rules."
provc 2 days ago
@provc
you forgot about the part where america was founded by slave owners who wanted to be free.
glasspig 1 day ago
@pianomanroc Ron's a good man, but he hasn't won a single state.
tinman24601 1 day ago
we the ppl run our country not you
alicia4buchanan 2 months ago
How about this, would any of you argue image isn't a big thing that helped Obama win in 2008??
Patriotman1990 2 months ago
Wait. Do we go around waiting to see what an inner city person would vote for? They wouldn't vote for Romney either or Palin or Reagan. Geez these Beck/Savage folks are getting kooky.
snorp73 2 months ago
@snorp73 I agree 100% Beck and Savage complete kooks
cpenn5476 2 months ago
Newt 2012. People Might not be hungry for food.....YET but we are getting closer to that day and everyone knows it, this is why NEWT has a good chance.
ZionistIDF 2 months ago
Old fat white men don't have a chance. Even the people who worked with Newt over the years DON'T endorse him.
ACORNSUCKS 2 months ago
You want to know why this nation is going down the drain? Listen to what Savage just pointed out, accurately I might add: Romney's better looking...
There is two decent candidates in the GOP field that are smart, have integrity and are knowledgeable on the country's situation, Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman. Yet this clown is suggesting Romney because "he's better looking". they are actually the only two capable of beating Obama by bringing the indy vote, the polls prove it. Stop being dumbar$es!
manniman82 2 months ago
@manniman82 You are a left-wing democrap.
ACORNSUCKS 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its simple to me. Newt has disgraced himself many times over several decades. He's paid over $300,000.00 in fines. He's been an INSIDE SHILL for huge corporations. He has been a corrupt politician his whole life. Most importantly his appetites are more important to him than the USA or its citizens. Simply put Newt is a CROOK. He should have gone to prison. It is idiotic to help him get onto the GOP ballot. Our nation is in DEEP trouble. GINGRICH IS NOT THE ANSWER
charles43110 2 months ago
Governor Donny Osmond of Massachusetts may be a douchebag, but if he in the long-run has the best chance of winning, he has my support 1000%. It is very disheartening that by the time of the New York Primary, House Speaker Nikita Khrushchev may very well have the nomination wrapped up. He may do better than Sarah Palin, but that's like comparing Mondale's defeat to Dukakis'; one may not lose as badly, but a loss is a loss is a loss. If this wimp gets reelected, the USSA is in dire straits.
grungefreak10 2 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAH OBAMA HAS THIS ELECTION IN THE BAG. THIS CALLER IS A MORON.
MADDKNOCKER 2 months ago
I can answer your question for you michael that the caller couldn't.Clinton is praising newt not because he thinks newt is easier for Obama, but because clinton is a political mischief maker and he knows his endorsement could do newt some harm amongst republican voters.He knows all about gingrich sitting with pelosi how that could harm gingrich and he is playing on it. Think deeper about it michael. You are not a stupid man so I do wonder if you are playing the media game as well....
arnie666 2 months ago
This is how I know you people are nutts!
This long TOOTH bastard says that, "Romney cares more about National Security than Obama."
Seriously, I shouldn't have to go here;
Somali Pirate
Ghadaffi
Mubarak
Al-Qaeda's #2 Man.....and the number 1 threat to the United States "National Security" Osama Bin Laden!
You clowns can say what you will about Obama and disrespect all him you want, but you can't get these terrorist to talk shit about him.They're literally scared to death of the man.
whiteliberal1 2 months ago
@SuperStormyLynn you are exactly right! You couldn't have said it better.. Newt and mitt are mussolini, by definition. Just look it up
coleman2586 2 months ago
Ron Paul is the only one. Newt is a Mussolini
coleman2586 2 months ago
Am I the only one who refuse to believe what the liberal media is saying about Romney? Wake Up AMERICA!!!!
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100 Trust me on this, but you're absolutely correct! These ppl. vote for certain members of their party as if they're rooting for a sports team. No matter how fucked-up the candidate is, they'll still support him them and take their word as the Gospel. It's like they're brainwashed.
Again, you're right about the media playing 'two ends' against each other. The old "DIVIDE AND CONQUER."
whiteliberal1 2 months ago
Women hate Gingrich. Perhaps not his positions, but his personal life offends many ladies.
lecagot2 2 months ago
bush = obama = mitt = newt = Same End Game.
In times like these, America doesn't need a Pizza Man, or a Flip Flopper, a Community Organizer, or a Lobbyist. I'm voting for the Doctor.
SuperStormyLynn 2 months ago
Obama was the best thing to happen to America for a long time ...it is waking up American's. Bush was taking us on a cruise ship slowly, Obama same direction same ship but on steroids.
videopaul1 2 months ago
Gingrich is the worst possible choice to run against Obambam. Another cronie capitalist and corrupt career politician, bought and paid for by corporate lobbyist.. And cheating on all 3 wives? If a man can't be trusted with loyalty to his loved one's, will he not betray my friendship also? Say one thing, but do another? Nevermind the moral issue, common sense throws a huge red flag! Running this bloated tic will only hand the election to Obambam.
SpinCage 2 months ago
1. America is poor 2. Obama is a doll 3. The guy tackles the slaves too much. He's not even right! LOL
Ruttie2 2 months ago
TEAM`S OF TAKE OVER
endbrainwashing 2 months ago
Unfortunately, in this world where the superficial trumps the substance, appearance is half the battle, and in that sense Gingrich loses big time to Obama. However, it should be noted that Herman Cain, which has been Savage's favorite, thus far, is hardly any better. So if electability has a lot to do with appearance both Cain and Gingrich are out. Who does that leave? Romney. It's an unfortunate choice, but in terms of electability, in a shallow electorate, he has the best stage presence.
alphacause 2 months ago
If Obama is electable...who the hell isn't??? The presidency is nothing more than a friggin popularity contest. My country is a joke. One giant mass of stupidity.
GrandFunker 3 months ago
@GrandFunker The student council elections at my school are more mature and educated than this attack ad/smear campaign war between an elephant and a donkey.
MIKON8ERISBACK 2 months ago
@GrandFunker George W Bush was the epitomy of a white male American, and yet he got elected 2x. Savage is way off on this one. I fully agree with you.
abaskcasckbackj 2 months ago
@abaskcasckbackj I don't know about way off...there are a lot more blacks, especially poorer inner city ones who may have never voted before who did and will again for Obama. My neighborhood is mostly black, and in the days before election day, there were Obama operatives all over the place here. Registering people to vote and handing out fliers explaininng the whole "right to vote" concept. I think Newt can beat Obama, but it will definitely take some work.
GrandFunker 2 months ago
@GrandFunker I hear what youre saying, bit here is my point again: If Obama ran against Gingrich, the blacks who voted for him would not increase, would stay the same most likely. Against Gingrich 90-10%. Cain at best would get 30% of the black vote, where as hed lose a cnsiderable greater amount of whites than Ginrich would lose from the black vote.
abaskcasckbackj 2 months ago
a good debater is your qualifications? this isnt American Idol idiots
PREZofUSSA 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who is the 1% does anyone even care?
Google - H.R. 4646 - Obama's 1% Transaction Tax - Urban Legends -----
Obamawarmongers 3 months ago
Michael Savage went downhill back in 2004, so good luck ya noobs.
DrWrongPaul 3 months ago
unfortunately, the medium is the message.
3rdEyeSpeaks 3 months ago
I subscribe to liberal shows too. Ron Paul is the favored candidate on the left as well as the right. He appears to be the most electable for either side.
OgreMECH 3 months ago
The ONLY person worth voting FOR is Ron Paul!
All the others are just different speeds towards the cliff of Collapse!
yakyakyak69 3 months ago 5
Progressivism / Liberalism / Keynesian Statism advocates change or reform through GOV'T action.
Give ANY politician or bureaucrat power to "redistribute & regulate" OTHER people’s money & choices and they will ALWAYS benefit THEIR “special interest” campaign backers; Financial-Industrial Complex, Military-Industrial Complex, Marxist Unions, Giant "Green" Corps, Big Oil, Pharma, Insurance etc.
Statism = Corrupt Political Cronyism.
Fed’s FIAT (counterfeit) debt-currency FUELS THE FIRE!
yakyakyak69 3 months ago
Ron Paul is NOT-Electable....even if you agree with him...people will NOT vote for him he looks like a tired, beat up, Old white guy from the South...Newt is very smart but a phony conservative, he beleives in immigration reform!!! Perry was my pick but he dumbed down in that debate...Cain is good but as a Treasury or Defense Secretary....As long as OBAMA is OUT..i really dont care..
akrivosdiavolos73 3 months ago
@akrivosdiavolos73 thats the problem. obama is the same as bush, republicans same as democrats. there all the same. obama gave us obamacare bush gave us prescription drug program, they both gave us bailouts, wars all over the place. fox news makes you think theres a difference but there really isnt
PREZofUSSA 3 months ago
@PREZofUSSA only Fox does that? MSNBC?
tillman40 2 months ago
@tillman40 no. msnbc does it for the democrat , and fox does it for the republican. and most of us fall for it like there really is a difference. both msnbc and fox hate ron paul though...that says alot
PREZofUSSA 2 months ago
done peace out loser Kingdingaling wtf ever you are rude and have nothing of value to add to my existence
MsJustanotherhuman 3 months ago
I like the way this caller turned Michael savage with his petty compliment on dems and repubs working together. Savage went from calling him an idiot to sending him a book!
dduras 3 months ago
1. Savage's analysis of the Bill Clinton endorsement assumes that Clinton wants Obama to win a second term . . .
2. Newt Gingrich is much improved over his 1996 self, but he still has enough combativeness to put up a good fight, which is sorely needed this time. Romney has been on both sides of every issue, and he practically stutters whenever he's confronted about it. Newt can take control of the debate.
3. All of Savage's points are a strong argument for Herman Cain. LOOKS matter.
EconomicLiteracyNow 3 months ago
@EconomicLiteracyNow If looks matter, then how in the hell is Cain going to appeal to the vast white majority in this country? he LOOKS ans SOUNDS like a bumbling idiot. If you want a polished appearnce as well as an articulate speaker, the candidate from Utah is pronbably the best of both worlds (John Huntsman), but wont win.
abaskcasckbackj 2 months ago
Newt Gingrich is a long time Neo-con. He is a bohemian Grove member, as well as the CFR. Newt is status quo.
buyred 3 months ago
Mitt Romney is fucking terrible, and Newt Gingrich is another false conservative. Ron Paul is a true conservative. Mitt Romney is a flip flopper, I can't believe that Savage supports him. He should know better.
LogSNES 3 months ago
Newt Romney or any other candidate except for Ron Paul they are just a bunch of war mongering scum. The only guy that doesn't flip flop is Dr. Paul. No scandals with Dr.Paul. I'm sick of the war mongerers and want peace. and sanity in foreign policy.
duxinarowe0 3 months ago
NEWT will lose savage was right urban areas and independent voters will not flock to him are u people fuckin crazy?.ROMNEY maybe. Ron Paul is a better choice then both those guys I really wanted Cain but he's damaged his run is over so I'm goin with Paul the libertarian conservative
TEAPARTYGUY84 3 months ago
Savage makes a decent point, but I do believe Gingrich could tear apart Obama better than Romney can. And since when did Obama look presidential? That lanky, ugly, huge-eared bastard. I think that what Savage is saying is you have to be 'not-white' to be elected nowadays, because it's associated with Bush who the Libs despised. I'm not sure.
I think Gingrich would make Obama look like a laughingstock, and it should be easy, Obama's been a HORRIBLE president.
Horrible, horrendous, unqualified.
Illumirage 3 months ago 14
@Illumirage Obama is horrendous, horrible and unqualified but Newt Gingrich will be the same kind of president.
They are both globalist sock puppets. He supports carbon credit schemes, believes in the global warming fraud, NAFTA, GATT, he's written the forward to a book supporting socialism saying it's the best third way. He's horrible, as a conservative.
We don't need globalists like Obozo, Clintongue or Newtick - we need Dr. Ron Paul to cure the private Fed infection.
abcmole 3 months ago
@Illumirage
I agree with you 100%, however thats not his point. We all know that Gingrich can eat Obama alive, the problem is the lemings that fallow Obama would never jump ship for him, or Ron Paul.
Skybaby79 3 months ago
@Skybaby79
Arguable...you're kind of right. I'd like to see Newt take on Obama face to face. It would be interesting to say the least. Newt seems to have the best presence of mind in debates.
But the part you're right about is that the Libs, whether Obama gets verbally fisted in the ass by Newt or not will claim victory by spinning it to suit their needs. And all the Jon Stewart audience member dipshits will lap it up without thinking twice.
Illumirage 2 months ago
@Illumirage Excluding Ron Paul...If any of these other fools get elected you will get the same monster wrapped into the same package and the end result will be the same...dig deep into their backgrounds and you see that they share the same affiliation with a certain powerful organization.
makun16 2 months ago
@makun16
You're just speculating on most of that. When in actuality many of the stances they take are the polar opposite of that of Obama & Co. And a Ron Paul supporter has no credibility in my book. Sorry, enabling methheads and blaming America for Islamic terrorism (on America) isn't my picture of competent leader. Ron Paul is a Liberal.
Illumirage 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Illumirage Excluding Ron Paul...If any of these other fools get elected you will get the same monster wrapped into a different package and the end result will be the same...dig deep into their backgrounds and you see that they share the same affiliation with a certain powerful organization.
makun16 2 months ago
@Illumirage The problem with Savages argument is he seems to implay that black-inner city folk vote at a high percentage. I dont recall W getting those votes either. Blacks make up 13% of the populace. Why cant Newt get 10% and win????? Seems quite easy considering the moron and failure hed be running against.
abaskcasckbackj 2 months ago
@Illumirage you people are all morons. what makes you think you're all smarter than Michael Savage. he's absolutely right about Gingrich being unelectable. the liberals are trying to sabotage this Republican primary. just look at all the attack Romney ads. at the same time, they're praising Gingrich. that' helps him with the polls. I promise you elect anybody but Romney and we have 4 more years of Obama.
dhom100 2 months ago
@dhom100
And hello to you too.....
Illumirage 2 months ago
As much as I despise this clown, Savage, he is definitely a true jester. He called Leroy a " old, fat white man." LOL
What is a "Old fat white man?" Some fat bastard who stands in his yard wearing a WIFE BEATER T-SHIRT, eating POTTED MEAT and yelling, "get off my damn grass?
whiteliberal1 2 months ago
@whiteliberal1
Who do you look to for insightful, sound political rhetoric then, Mr. White Liberal? Jon Stewart?
I can already tell I don't like you.
Illumirage 2 months ago
@Illumirage How old are you, 8? Why should I care if some you-tube character "don't like me?"
Just respond to my comment about Leroy "tearing apart Obama," or, view the POTUS ripping the republican congress asshole apart. That's really all the proof I need.
Even Leroy's own party doesn't like him. The same goes for Willard. Now you have Trump exposing these clowns as a bunch of circus freaks!
Btw, not that I'm a Jon Stewart fan, but I have seen him "tear FOX NEWS apart!" LOL
whiteliberal1 2 months ago
@whiteliberal1
I'm actually 27.
Why do you insist on calling people by names they don't go by?
He meant just that (old, fat white man). Not some character from the film 'deliverance'.
Were you sitting in the crowd when Jon 'ripped them Fox news apart? After all, Stewart is notorious for harboring about the dumbest crowd on television (or maybe The View). Add to that the fact that he takes a bunch of chopped up soundbites & uses them out of context. Yeah, real clever, inventive stuff there Jon.
Illumirage 2 months ago
@Illumirage
Don't bother. whiteliberal1 is a notorious troll here. All he does is pick fights, then he will go on continuously insulting you while ignoring anything that you happen to say, regardless of how factual or accurate. Best thing to do is completely ignore him. He gets off on pointless argument.
mcdonalsuny 2 months ago
@mcdonalsuny
That sounds about right. Thanks for the heads up.
I should have known that going in, anyone who touts the fact that they're a liberal is a little off their rocker from the get-go. When in actuality the moniker 'liberal' is something of a badge of shame....
Illumirage 2 months ago
@Illumirage Um, I saw Jon rip fox news up on the "O'really factor." Fox even had the nerves to try and edit the Ass Whoopin! LOL
Besides, get to the part where Obama ripped the republican congress a new one as well. I see you still haven't adressed that yet.
Again, "we shouldn't have allowed cameras in this meeting today!" A republican congressman who wanted to remain annonymous.
whiteliberal1 2 months ago
@whiteliberal1
I'm not even sure which speech you're referring to. What does it matter, Obama doesn't rip anyone a new one, he gets ripped a new one by everyone, because he has done maybe one thing right since he took office. Your liberal president is a complete hack.
Jon puts up a fight when he's on O'Reilly, he never wins though.
Illumirage 2 months ago
@Illumirage Why does he have to be ugly?
He looks better than those ugly ass old white guys who are running for president
AgrivatedKillah 2 months ago
@AgrivatedKillah
Why does he have to be? I'm not sure, he just is.
Look, I'm 100% straight. But Romney has Obama beat by a lightyear. And since when is 'white' an insult? Old usually also equates to wisdom.
Illumirage 2 months ago
@Illumirage I never said white was an insult.
And I was going to put, except romney, because I agree he is better looking.
Obama isn't bad looking.
I personally think JFK was the most handsome president.
But also, being old means wisdom..but every old person has wisdom.. I rather have someone with intelligence...[which not every old person has]
AgrivatedKillah 2 months ago
"You're a young Latino citizen would you vote for Newt?" No I'd vote for Ron Paul.
Norie92 3 months ago
4 more years of obama and america is over.
moviesforrandy 3 months ago 21
This has been flagged as spam show
@moviesforrandy Gingrich wrote the forward for a book "Creating a New Civilization" by Alvin and Heidi Tofler, who are "ex" Marxists and "futurists" that Newt calls friends. "The Constitution of the United States needs to be reconsidered and altered.....The system that served us so well must, in its turn, die and be replaced. "-- Sure sounds like UN Agenda 21 to me! Learn about it before you vote!
vechorik 3 months ago
Ironically his book is named Abuse of Power yet he refuses to see the abuse of power America exerts over smaller nations. If Savage was really worried about national security, he'd support a candidate that wants to bring the troops home and quit antagonizing other countries to attack us by occupying their country. You can call him "Ron crazy Paul" all you want you neocon shill, but we are on to your bitch ass Savage. Ron Paul 2012!
fightphreak 3 months ago
Kleptocrats gone wild! Ron Paul is or even Gary Johnson are the only options.
slhines7 3 months ago
Ron Paul's dad is a lizard
KampfgruppePeiper 3 months ago
The only hope we have is Ron Paul. All these global banks are ruining every country they can there greedy little paws on.
E2ekiel555 3 months ago 3
romney? I rather have oboma, at least it will wake more people. he's a neocon.
mike1988123 3 months ago
Savage is an idiot! Gingrich is a bought and sold piece of trash. Romney puppet just like Obama and the only one who can do the next right thing is RON PAUL!
MsJustanotherhuman 3 months ago
@MsJustanotherhuman RU PAUL DURRRR!! 201012
Bitch shut the fuck up.
KingDingaLing090 3 months ago
@KingDingaLing090 bitch this asswad!..public channel lets me be capable of expressing myself. what the fuck is your issue king dumb ass?... You want Gingrich I wanna divorce while youre dying ass as President? Are you serious? So what is his foreign policy....(tapping foot) same as the ass hole that is there now. Military wife sick to death of taking our poor to go and kill their poor, are we clear? Or are you too busy using your lack of communication skills to get off your dead ass?
MsJustanotherhuman 3 months ago
@MsJustanotherhuman Why don't you comment intelligently about the video? Instead you and a dozen other people just said "RU PAUL 2012!" I am sick of you. Shut the hell up. You are going to plaster your stupid slogans on every political video until the elections anyways, so fuck it, I am going to do the same thing to you.
FUCK RON PAUL AND FUCK HIS CULT.<--- You
KingDingaLing090 3 months ago
@KingDingaLing090
Thank you, I agree. These idiots parrot that shit off everywhere they go, I kind of half-believe some of them want to go down on that old geezer.
Illumirage 3 months ago
@Illumirage Me 2. And look at this bastard below with his rant on hunger in America. His proof that Americans are starving is this direct quote: "Feeding America is annually providing food to 37 million Americans, including 14 million children. This is an increase of 46 percent over 2006, when we were feeding 25 million Americans, including 9 million children, each year." <---- Look at how retarded this person is!! His proof that children are starving is a fact that we are feeding them! LOL
KingDingaLing090 3 months ago
@KingDingaLing090