@DavidJ751990 So you know "because".Maybe if you checkj out the facts like ,on high rise firers,high rise engineering ect .you will not find any that have coolaped. Before you make a fool out of yourself,consider the facts
The whole reason terrorists chose flights leaving from the east coast to California was because there would be a lot of jet fuel in it, making the fire spread more, causing the building to collapse. The iron steal wasn't strong enough to sustain the heat.
@DavidJ751990 3 buildings all fall into the most resistance, they all fell at speeds with NO RESISTANCE. 10 floors per second, how can that be, how could all 3 buildings blow all it's contents to dust, except for the steel beams? Common sense tells you there was more than just a failure and collapse. Common sense says these 3 buildings were taken down on purpose. Now, look at what has happened since 9/11 and becomes totally clear that 9/11 is a big fat lie. PNAC, the new pearl harbor, read it.
Marriott was inbetween the towers & it didnt collapse. WTC 5 and 6 were closer than 7. They didnt collapse. The big black hotel to east was as far as WTC 7 and it didnt collapse. IT COULD HAPPEN THOUGH, it could of been damaged more than others somehow......but cant you atleast try to see everything these people are saying when they ask questions about all this? Debunkers always..and i repeat..always, repeat the Govt story word for word. IF you dont think Govt lies, then you will never see.
Dying is bad. Being murdered to benefit the murderer is worse,
But being murdered so the murderer can exploit your death & commit barbaric genocide upon millions more INNOCENT civilization, is far worse than any death one can die
The Military-Industrial Complex (see Operation Northwoods) is that FACELESS, MURDERING COWARD Which is fulfilling It's plan effortlessly. Continuing to reap into horrific twists
On top of that, there is video shot from the New Jersey side of the river from sometime earlier in the afternoon shown on, I think Fox, that show the Trade Center area including the side of Tower 7 you do not see here, and man, if was all messed up. The HBO documentary on 9/11 home videos of the event shows workers coming from near WTC 7 saying that building was about to go, because they saw it, heard it creaking, and it was on fire. All these WTC7 explosion crap is exactly that, crap. No proof.
@dsmcclellan geez, why didn't they expect 10 buildings to collapse, they saw the towers do it, why didn't the whole damn city collapse, I swear, some people are really dumb.
Ummmm...the NYFD predicted the possibility of collapse. So they made the decision to pull their men out. From that point on, it was a "let-it-burn" situation. Then they create a safe zone around the structure in case of collapse. Standard operating procedure (SOP), but not a common occurrence for a high-rise fire.
hm.. seems like it was really damaged from this angle. I just saw a video that falling WTC actually hit it so it makes sense that they were evacuating the place.
WTC7 was the CIA nerve center in NY funny that it should go down the same day as the buildings, which they told their employees (who were all evacuated resulting in no injuries, thank goodness) would be destroyed for "safety" reasons, the charges were already set.. conveniently.
The only reason i can say beyond a doubt, as a teaching physicist, that the question of the two towers could be called into doubt is the river of molten metal that flowed under the area for days.
@Halo4Lyf temps in the thousands of degrees for 3 months, pulling out metal beams that were glowing orange from the debris piles. It's all on film, you just have to have the courage to look for it. Don't worry if someone says you are wearing a tinfoil hat, their opinion doesn't mean a damn thing. if you want truth, you have to look for it, you won't see it on your TV.
@Halo4Lyf I couldn't careless what reaction caused it, fact is, it was there. PROVEN. Ya, this is YT, so get off your coward ass and find the vids yourself. Obviously you just want to piss all over the truth for your own selfish reasons. nyccan dot org..jersey girls.These are families of VICTIMS, first responders, those who made it out.THEY ALL HAVE SIGNED A PETITION for a new investigation because they KNOW the 'official' story is a LIE. USE your own abilities and LOOK. I'm not your mind maker.
@Halo4Lyf Yup, you are too much of a coward to look, so you take the easy way out and believe your TV and call people like myself crank's. You have NO guts, no balls, you are a scared rabbit that cannot fathom reality. I pity you, I really do. They will expose the truth, this is the reason for the release of all this new material they are now releasing. They will announce that 9/11 was a lie and you will be strung up by your balls for treason. Good luck with that.
Ya'know the more Lame comparisons like your's are made the more pissed off actual structural engineneers, Architechs and Physicists get . It is going to take time but pretty soon everyone of them will look at the evidence and respond accordingly by joining the growing list that already have. You can go back to watching "THE ( re-writing ) HISTORY CHANNEL" now.
Look idiot; steel beams and concrete tends to maintain their physical integrity unless some external force is applied to them. And a carbon based Fire does not meet the requisite force to change that . Are you going to argue with that ? Dipshit.
"look idiot" I love that - when you get angry because your whako theories aren't accepted by people with common sense call them an idiot.
In terms of steel beams and fire - We had a fire at a strip mall not far from where I live and the steel beams were warped to the point that it was obvious that they were severely weakened.
So keep throwing out your "expert" arguments all you want. The bottom line is people with common sense aren't going to fall for this agenda you whack jobs have.
Just wondering if you can explain to me how debris from Flight 93 (the one that crashed in the field in Pennsylvania) was found scattered in an eight mile radius?
LOL! That's it ?! that's your proof? Against the mountain of physical and video evidence supporting CD. I tell you what; there's a guy you should look into; his name was NEWTON He identified these little things called "THE LAWS OF PHYSICS" one of the first was called I'll say it slowly "The conservation of ENERGY" He was kind of a stickler about it!
"the mountain of physical and video evidence supporting CD."
There is no mountain.
"NEWTON He identified these little things called "THE LAWS OF PHYSICS" one of the first was called I'll say it slowly "The conservation of ENERGY" He was kind of a stickler about it!"
Newton's first law is the law of inertia, you are thinking of the first law of thermodynamics which is not broken here so I don't know why you are bringing it up.
Most conspiracy theorists are family members and scientists. So f#ck off. You couldn't come close to their experiences or their qualifications. Flip your burgers and stay out of areas where you peon brain can't keep up.
Actually, you are the brainwashed one...running those videos of terrorists crashing into buildings over and over again...terrorists that couldn't fly Cessnas. Yes, lets talk about the engineers,scientists and architects world wide who know that only the U.S. gov't., Israel and the CIA could have orchestrated this. Family members? Yes, they hate people like you who hide in a hole and refuse to look at the truth. You have clearly been blindsided.
I guess once you become a whack job, there's not much hope for you.
Hey cateran - You're right you're goverment is out to get you.....BOO!!!
It's just so amusing to watch a bunch of idiots with their agendas act like they are smarter than everyone else while the normal people roll their eyes at them.
No plane would have had to hit that building. Just the shockwaves from the impacts of the planes on the WTC and the shockwaves from the collapse of the WTC would probably do considerable structural damage.
Did you see the video posted where the BBC reporter is reporting at 4:55 (around then) that the building has fallen when the building is clearly behind her and the WTC 7 didn't coDid you see the video posted where the BBC reporter is reporting at 4:55 (around then) that the building has fallen when the building was behind her and didn't implode until 5:20. Its on youtube (try BBC reports wtc7 falls).
Who, these reporters, unconcerned? I went to school with Dan (college.) He grew up in Manhatan, and is a very decent guy. There is NO WAY he would be 'unconcerned' about this happening in his hometown. Having known him, I don't beieve it. He's not capable of such callousness.
@DavidJ751990 So you know "because".Maybe if you checkj out the facts like ,on high rise firers,high rise engineering ect .you will not find any that have coolaped. Before you make a fool out of yourself,consider the facts
TheJamminjeff 1 year ago
The whole reason terrorists chose flights leaving from the east coast to California was because there would be a lot of jet fuel in it, making the fire spread more, causing the building to collapse. The iron steal wasn't strong enough to sustain the heat.
TheLaurenkent 1 year ago
9/11 was a Black Pope Job !!!!!!
*This message sponsored by AIPAC
euro944t 1 year ago
@DavidJ751990 3 buildings all fall into the most resistance, they all fell at speeds with NO RESISTANCE. 10 floors per second, how can that be, how could all 3 buildings blow all it's contents to dust, except for the steel beams? Common sense tells you there was more than just a failure and collapse. Common sense says these 3 buildings were taken down on purpose. Now, look at what has happened since 9/11 and becomes totally clear that 9/11 is a big fat lie. PNAC, the new pearl harbor, read it.
blite13 1 year ago
if this is ever proven beyond the shadow of doubt that our or one of our allies govt. had something to do with this........my ancestors will avenge
stinkdad 1 year ago
Seems that many people knew in advance it was going to "come down". How could they know? Was it planned?
gggfausto 1 year ago
Marriott was inbetween the towers & it didnt collapse. WTC 5 and 6 were closer than 7. They didnt collapse. The big black hotel to east was as far as WTC 7 and it didnt collapse. IT COULD HAPPEN THOUGH, it could of been damaged more than others somehow......but cant you atleast try to see everything these people are saying when they ask questions about all this? Debunkers always..and i repeat..always, repeat the Govt story word for word. IF you dont think Govt lies, then you will never see.
nath8282 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
-
I feel so much grief for the 9-11 victims.
Dying is bad. Being murdered to benefit the murderer is worse,
But being murdered so the murderer can exploit your death & commit barbaric genocide upon millions more INNOCENT civilization, is far worse than any death one can die
The Military-Industrial Complex (see Operation Northwoods) is that FACELESS, MURDERING COWARD Which is fulfilling It's plan effortlessly. Continuing to reap into horrific twists
& THE SHEEP KEEP LOOKING THE OTHER WAY
4aaaaa4 2 years ago
On top of that, there is video shot from the New Jersey side of the river from sometime earlier in the afternoon shown on, I think Fox, that show the Trade Center area including the side of Tower 7 you do not see here, and man, if was all messed up. The HBO documentary on 9/11 home videos of the event shows workers coming from near WTC 7 saying that building was about to go, because they saw it, heard it creaking, and it was on fire. All these WTC7 explosion crap is exactly that, crap. No proof.
CArchivist 2 years ago
Shit. Another bullshit conspiracy. They'd just watched 2 buildings fall. So why wouldn't they think it'd fall? Geez. Get out a little bit more idiot.
dsmcclellan 3 years ago
@dsmcclellan geez, why didn't they expect 10 buildings to collapse, they saw the towers do it, why didn't the whole damn city collapse, I swear, some people are really dumb.
blite13 1 year ago
Ummmm...the NYFD predicted the possibility of collapse. So they made the decision to pull their men out. From that point on, it was a "let-it-burn" situation. Then they create a safe zone around the structure in case of collapse. Standard operating procedure (SOP), but not a common occurrence for a high-rise fire.
There is nothing strange about their S.O.P.
FreqBand 3 years ago
hm.. seems like it was really damaged from this angle. I just saw a video that falling WTC actually hit it so it makes sense that they were evacuating the place.
kakaokaka 3 years ago
WTC7 was the CIA nerve center in NY funny that it should go down the same day as the buildings, which they told their employees (who were all evacuated resulting in no injuries, thank goodness) would be destroyed for "safety" reasons, the charges were already set.. conveniently.
The only reason i can say beyond a doubt, as a teaching physicist, that the question of the two towers could be called into doubt is the river of molten metal that flowed under the area for days.
Puabond 3 years ago 2
The river of molten metal that flowed for DAYS?
Seriously? Days? You're sticking with that?
Halo4Lyf 2 years ago
@Halo4Lyf temps in the thousands of degrees for 3 months, pulling out metal beams that were glowing orange from the debris piles. It's all on film, you just have to have the courage to look for it. Don't worry if someone says you are wearing a tinfoil hat, their opinion doesn't mean a damn thing. if you want truth, you have to look for it, you won't see it on your TV.
blite13 1 year ago 2
@blite13 You're talking about levels of energy sustained over an amount of time that just isn't possible for chemical reactions.
This is YouTube. Find some video and send it to me if you think da troof is that important.
Halo4Lyf 1 year ago
@Halo4Lyf I couldn't careless what reaction caused it, fact is, it was there. PROVEN. Ya, this is YT, so get off your coward ass and find the vids yourself. Obviously you just want to piss all over the truth for your own selfish reasons. nyccan dot org..jersey girls.These are families of VICTIMS, first responders, those who made it out.THEY ALL HAVE SIGNED A PETITION for a new investigation because they KNOW the 'official' story is a LIE. USE your own abilities and LOOK. I'm not your mind maker.
blite13 1 year ago
@blite13 No, no, you're just crank.
Halo4Lyf 1 year ago
@Halo4Lyf Yup, you are too much of a coward to look, so you take the easy way out and believe your TV and call people like myself crank's. You have NO guts, no balls, you are a scared rabbit that cannot fathom reality. I pity you, I really do. They will expose the truth, this is the reason for the release of all this new material they are now releasing. They will announce that 9/11 was a lie and you will be strung up by your balls for treason. Good luck with that.
blite13 1 year ago
@blite13 You'll find it rather hard to get across my front lawn while under accurate rifle fire from the house. Good luck with that.
Halo4Lyf 1 year ago
@Halo4Lyf It won't be me buddy, good luck.
blite13 1 year ago
OK, so now you conspiracy nuts think that the news media were in on it?
srdale17 3 years ago
wow dan abrams looked so different back then.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago 2
I know!
Bhana18 3 years ago 2
"the way the wind has been moving"
hilarious
impeach, indict, convict, imprison not just the bush regime but the corporate-controlled, 9/11 cover-up media!!!!
steelersrulenyc23 4 years ago 10
Goddamn idiot. Yes, YOU.
theOlLineRebel 3 years ago
Ya'know the more Lame comparisons like your's are made the more pissed off actual structural engineneers, Architechs and Physicists get . It is going to take time but pretty soon everyone of them will look at the evidence and respond accordingly by joining the growing list that already have. You can go back to watching "THE ( re-writing ) HISTORY CHANNEL" now.
z8it 4 years ago
How did you manage to spell "physicists" correctly?
tjm7077 4 years ago 2
I got lucky... What can I tell you it was late and I was pissed.
z8it 4 years ago
Look idiot; steel beams and concrete tends to maintain their physical integrity unless some external force is applied to them. And a carbon based Fire does not meet the requisite force to change that . Are you going to argue with that ? Dipshit.
z8it 4 years ago
"look idiot" I love that - when you get angry because your whako theories aren't accepted by people with common sense call them an idiot.
In terms of steel beams and fire - We had a fire at a strip mall not far from where I live and the steel beams were warped to the point that it was obvious that they were severely weakened.
So keep throwing out your "expert" arguments all you want. The bottom line is people with common sense aren't going to fall for this agenda you whack jobs have.
Phillymike77 4 years ago
Just wondering if you can explain to me how debris from Flight 93 (the one that crashed in the field in Pennsylvania) was found scattered in an eight mile radius?
lastnymleft 4 years ago
"Nobody could have predicted this building was to fall."
That's weird because ALL of the firemen said it was going to fall hours before it did.
macman13 4 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No; Wrong; LIAR they said it was going to BLOW UP! You bootlicking apologist Nazi!
z8it 4 years ago
"No; Wrong; LIAR they said it was going to BLOW UP!"
So then the firemen are all in on it? Here, watch this
watch?v=3HLDgjYuRHk
macman13 4 years ago 3
LOL! That's it ?! that's your proof? Against the mountain of physical and video evidence supporting CD. I tell you what; there's a guy you should look into; his name was NEWTON He identified these little things called "THE LAWS OF PHYSICS" one of the first was called I'll say it slowly "The conservation of ENERGY" He was kind of a stickler about it!
z8it 4 years ago
"the mountain of physical and video evidence supporting CD."
There is no mountain.
"NEWTON He identified these little things called "THE LAWS OF PHYSICS" one of the first was called I'll say it slowly "The conservation of ENERGY" He was kind of a stickler about it!"
Newton's first law is the law of inertia, you are thinking of the first law of thermodynamics which is not broken here so I don't know why you are bringing it up.
macman13 4 years ago
@macman13
BBC predicted it 20min prior
their source (un-named Senior Pentagon Official)
same source Popular Mechanics used for "Debunking 911 myths" (editor is Mossad Chertoff's family)
PM mag fired entire staff months before this hit piece
euro944t 1 year ago
911missinglinksDOTcom
It was the Catholic Pope !!!!!!!!
Please send more American blood and treasure to secure IsraHell
Shalom
euro944t 1 year ago
This is posted to prove a conspiracy theory? LMAO - These people are so pathetic it's unbelievable.
It is incredibly sad that these people continue to use the deaths of 3,000 some odd people for some whacked out agenda they have.
Phillymike77 4 years ago
Yout got it. The conspiracy theorists are laughable.
raiders1967 4 years ago
Most conspiracy theorists are family members and scientists. So f#ck off. You couldn't come close to their experiences or their qualifications. Flip your burgers and stay out of areas where you peon brain can't keep up.
cateran65 4 years ago 3
Another idiot brainwashed by this crap acting like he's smarter than the rest.
Scientist? Let's talk about engineers. I have seen engineer after engineer discredit your whacked out theories.
Families? I know several people who lost family that day and they can't stand people like you who use their loved ones for this agenda of yours.
MikeJL1977 4 years ago
Actually, you are the brainwashed one...running those videos of terrorists crashing into buildings over and over again...terrorists that couldn't fly Cessnas. Yes, lets talk about the engineers,scientists and architects world wide who know that only the U.S. gov't., Israel and the CIA could have orchestrated this. Family members? Yes, they hate people like you who hide in a hole and refuse to look at the truth. You have clearly been blindsided.
cateran65 4 years ago
I guess once you become a whack job, there's not much hope for you.
Hey cateran - You're right you're goverment is out to get you.....BOO!!!
It's just so amusing to watch a bunch of idiots with their agendas act like they are smarter than everyone else while the normal people roll their eyes at them.
MikeJL1977 4 years ago
Cite them! you LIAR! And there are thousands more that DEMAND real answers to legitimate questions.
z8it 4 years ago
C.T. losers.
pissoff1994 4 years ago
Sorry..meant MANHATTAN...hate this laptop...
meredumais 4 years ago
so wait, because two building have already fallen. they should let everyone on site go near the building that is on fire?
MessyCans 4 years ago
No plane would have had to hit that building. Just the shockwaves from the impacts of the planes on the WTC and the shockwaves from the collapse of the WTC would probably do considerable structural damage.
rickyfan3956 4 years ago
But not collapse at free fall speed. No building can ever collapse at free fall speed unless dynamite is involved.
cateran65 4 years ago
right, they where pushin them back because they knew what was bout to happen not because it was unstoppable but because they where doin it.
getrichyoung 5 years ago
they're not concered.. they're preparing for that building to fall...
ccosborn 5 years ago
Did you see the video posted where the BBC reporter is reporting at 4:55 (around then) that the building has fallen when the building is clearly behind her and the WTC 7 didn't coDid you see the video posted where the BBC reporter is reporting at 4:55 (around then) that the building has fallen when the building was behind her and didn't implode until 5:20. Its on youtube (try BBC reports wtc7 falls).
linda254 5 years ago
Who, these reporters, unconcerned? I went to school with Dan (college.) He grew up in Manhatan, and is a very decent guy. There is NO WAY he would be 'unconcerned' about this happening in his hometown. Having known him, I don't beieve it. He's not capable of such callousness.
meredumais 4 years ago