To understand You only have to understand how the energy transfers from Up & Down to Rotary. And how HHO boosting (increasing the flame speed) can help this energy transfer.
So stop trying to explain how it works or does not work until you understand the ICE. Rant over Thank YOU
Forget about the "Mech to Elec" (=E loss) "Elec to Chem" (=E loss also) Chem to Chem (Not relevant, even if this was a small point of gain or loss) the chemical to mechanical and the Mechanical to Mechanical are the only places you should look to Explain how HHO Boosting can/does work.
For everyone else. WAKE UP CALL HERE! STOP looking at the Electrical to chemical energy transfer of Energy to support or deni "How HHO can or can't work". THAT HAS ***NOTHING*** TO DUE WITH IT !!!!!
Look at the mechanical to mechanical transfer of energy points of the ICE. JUST LOOK HERE!
There is a groups of guys who are rabidly opposed to HHO research and spam comment various researchers videos. I deleted several comments that were not appropriate and the negative votes are left over from that.
cannot wait for the next one,you gave the energies and the motive to continue on this and to complete perfecting my cell and to install it in my truck .
But the question I guess is what was the energy source to create the hudrogen? Some say that the fact that the HHO device takes its energy from the alternator is a bad thing and increases the fuel consumption? i had a theory that if the hydrogen was generated from electricity produced by the thermoelectrc effect and took heat energy from the exhaust and the engine cooling system that might work better? just a thought. i dunno . . .
Watch part 2. There are papers that covered that. The idea is that we are improving the combustion efficiency to a point where it "pays" for the electricity need for electrolysis.
@jakerwall ... Is is proper to term it as "Catalytic Combustion Effect"? Clearly, the combustion character contributes greatly in making slow burn fuels burn a bit faster - thereby increasing it's BTU potential. - just a thought. Thanks for posting these videos. Good work!
@BespokeGroupUK With the study done on this video...it showed that by increasing the voltage you can offset the drain on the alternator...one of the studies said it used 3 amps of power...that is fuck all...it's almost the same as a portable dvd player...and just a fifth of the power of air conditioning...so the study is pretty much a proof that anyone opposing hho is a liar and a salesman.
Here's a link to a whitepaper with PROOF links:
eagle-research(dot)com/cms/node/443
ecopegasus 5 days ago
Here is another article from 1989 to look for, but you will have to pay for it :
IEEE Article 899403
FUEL CONSUMPTION AND EMISSION OF SI ENGINE FUELED WITH H2-ENRICHED GASOLINE
Y. Hacohen and E. Sher
The Pearlstone Center for Aeronautical Engineering Studies
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer Sheva. Israel
It concludes a 10-15% fuel economy gain with a 2.3 carbureted engine, but an increase in NOx. It states a hydrogen to fuel mass ratio of 2-6%.
cfg83 1 year ago
this is an extremely important topic. This simple technology will save you tons of money individuallly, and will make important changes globally.
georgehenryify 1 year ago
Rant Part 3
To understand You only have to understand how the energy transfers from Up & Down to Rotary. And how HHO boosting (increasing the flame speed) can help this energy transfer.
So stop trying to explain how it works or does not work until you understand the ICE. Rant over Thank YOU
Yourfishman 1 year ago
Rant Part 2
Forget about the "Mech to Elec" (=E loss) "Elec to Chem" (=E loss also) Chem to Chem (Not relevant, even if this was a small point of gain or loss) the chemical to mechanical and the Mechanical to Mechanical are the only places you should look to Explain how HHO Boosting can/does work.
Yourfishman 1 year ago
Jakerwall,
Nice video,
For everyone else. WAKE UP CALL HERE! STOP looking at the Electrical to chemical energy transfer of Energy to support or deni "How HHO can or can't work". THAT HAS ***NOTHING*** TO DUE WITH IT !!!!!
Look at the mechanical to mechanical transfer of energy points of the ICE. JUST LOOK HERE!
Yourfishman 1 year ago
whats with all the negative comment votes..?
slade420 2 years ago
There is a groups of guys who are rabidly opposed to HHO research and spam comment various researchers videos. I deleted several comments that were not appropriate and the negative votes are left over from that.
jakerwall 2 years ago
Deleting the truth will not make it go away. HHO devices do not decrease fuel consumption in cars.
2ericmyers2 2 years ago
I just turn the comment voting off. Makes for a easier read when people cant downrate comments off the thread.
pat1huey 2 years ago
Thanks for posting these videos. I also have these documents posted on my site
EletrikRide 2 years ago
You really did your homework... Much appreciated. It is these opposing studies that aid us in our ultimate goal.
Keep up the good work
whiterican74 2 years ago
What are the dates of these studies?
jjenson2006 2 years ago
TEN OUT OF TEN ADDED TO ALL DOCUMENTS
ashtweth 2 years ago
cannot wait for the next one,you gave the energies and the motive to continue on this and to complete perfecting my cell and to install it in my truck .
thank you
najman100 2 years ago
Keep me posted on your results!!!
jakerwall 2 years ago
Nice job Jake..glad to see you are still at it.. Scuffy
scuffy44 2 years ago
But the question I guess is what was the energy source to create the hudrogen? Some say that the fact that the HHO device takes its energy from the alternator is a bad thing and increases the fuel consumption? i had a theory that if the hydrogen was generated from electricity produced by the thermoelectrc effect and took heat energy from the exhaust and the engine cooling system that might work better? just a thought. i dunno . . .
BespokeGroupUK 2 years ago 2
Watch part 2. There are papers that covered that. The idea is that we are improving the combustion efficiency to a point where it "pays" for the electricity need for electrolysis.
jakerwall 2 years ago
@jakerwall ... Is is proper to term it as "Catalytic Combustion Effect"? Clearly, the combustion character contributes greatly in making slow burn fuels burn a bit faster - thereby increasing it's BTU potential. - just a thought. Thanks for posting these videos. Good work!
ehnriko 2 years ago
@BespokeGroupUK With the study done on this video...it showed that by increasing the voltage you can offset the drain on the alternator...one of the studies said it used 3 amps of power...that is fuck all...it's almost the same as a portable dvd player...and just a fifth of the power of air conditioning...so the study is pretty much a proof that anyone opposing hho is a liar and a salesman.
magicyte 1 year ago