Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (264)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • /watch?v=42dINy58Wik&feature=e­ndscreen&NR=1

    first few seconds you see the old gray and blue livery of united airlines. you have to be crazy or ignorant to ignore that it was a civilian airliner.

  • Patriotsquestion911(dot)com

    300+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members

    (blue background, 1st section): FIRE, police, and Emergency Medical Services

    (pink background, scroll down a bit) FAMILY MEMBERS

    Learn the TRUTH about 9/11 from people who were there, in the buildings. Some of these heroes died, but their words from radio communication are there for all to 'hear'.

    Listen to the voices of people who lost loved ones on 9/11. They don't want lies, they want TRUTH and JUSTICE.

  • @ucancallmeOh So what does that have to do with this video? And the "pods" it claims were on the planes??

    So was it:

    1. Planes with missiles?

    2. Thermite/nanothermite?

    3. Demolition charges?

    w-w-w.questionsquestions.n et/WTC/pod.ht ml

    YT blocks urls so remove spaces and dashes

    This simple write up makes this video look very stupid.. Trust evidence/experts not highly modified videos

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ The point is that the OS (Official Story) is filled with LIES (not errors). If the OS is LIES, then we need a new, HONEST investigation or a criminal court case.

    You see the same videos that I see. I don't know if you check out the same websites and read the same articles, but you could. If you consider the most respected sources of the Truth Movement, the evidence is abundant.

    AE911truth(dot)org

    Patriotsquestion911(dot)com

    David Ray Griffin's research

  • @ucancallmeOh Your ignoring my questions. This is another strange truther tactic.

    So was it:

    1. Planes with missiles?

    2. Thermite/nanothermite?

    3. Demolition charges?

    You say you have done all kinds of research with ae/Griffin/Patrioits so it should be easy to tell me what the cause was.

    Unless as the psychology article says you started with the summary and are now trying to prop it up with ever changing theories.

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ All three WTC buildings were brought down by CD (Controlled Demolition). Nano-thermite was found in the dust of the WTC, so yes #2 Nanothermite. Nanothermite can be used for either an incendiary or an explosive, so yes, #3 apppears to be true. As for #1, I've never made this assertion nor have I read it in papers nor seen it in videos, so that would be a No, as far as I know.

    watch?v=x3zmEnwfc5s

    9/11 Firemen Testimonials of Explosions

  • @ucancallmeOh

    ae911truthcencors has been exposed as a CoIntel and a fraud posing as a Judy Woods-truther then coming forward with the real him under this video:

    watch?v=i6eMq5Rit1w

    He's a sad looser.

  • @ucancallmeOh so I viewed the video and they are talking about explosions not thermite intense heat, light, sparks.

    So do you understand you are commenting on a video that proclaims missiles under planes were fired at the WTC towers? Are you supporting this video or criticizing it?

    Do you know you are the first truth-er to actually settle on a cause in my experience? At least you have that going for you!

  • @ae911truthcensors and @Thetan1974 - I believe @Thetan1974. People who LIE in order to deceive the public about the events of 9/11 are the scum of the earth, as far as I'm concerned. I totally forgive the ignorant and the brainwashed, but those who deliberately lie should be charged with war crimes when all JUSTICE finally comes.

  • @ucancallmeOh So by your standard isn't @Thetan guilty of war crimes? He is spreading "lie"s according to you. You say it was Thermite and yet you say Thetan isn't wrong in promoting and professing the missile theory to be undeniably true?

    There is a pattern hear. Just like the psychology today article outlined. You start with the paranoid mistrust conclusions and the facts that try to prop it up don't matter.

    Simple logic if it was thermite it couldn't have been a missile.

  • @ucancallmeOh But you didn't answer the other questions.

    If it was thermite why didn't anyone see sparks bright light or heat damage on the steel.

    What were the planes then? Just a diversion?

    Was thermite used on Trade3 or 4 or 5? Why didn't Trade 6 fall?

    Have you ever seen thermite used in demolition? If it was so great the demolition industry surely would have adopted this 50 years ago right?

    And you are saying it was thermite and the missile theory of incorrect right?

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ You don't want the TRUTH; this is just a job to you.

    1. Thermite/ bright light: The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31 7 1874-4125/09 2009 Bentham Open

    "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" by Niels H. Harrit, et al.

    (Google the title -- easiest way to find it)

    And don't act like you haven't seen the "bright light" of the South Tower, 80th floor --it's on a ton of videos.

    watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

    AE: WTC 7

  • @ucancallmeOh A job? Eating brownies today?

    So don't you look silly commenting on a video that says it was missiles when you are 100% certain it wasn't?

    If it was thermite why was none seen around bldg. 7? Have you ever seen thermite burn?

    What were the planes then? Just a diversion?

    Was thermite used on Trade3 or 4 or 5? Why didn't Trade 6 fall? Was the Pentagon thermite? Makes no sense.

    If it is so cut-dried why won't Harrit/Jones share their samples/data with other scientists?

  • @ucancallmeOh No bight light and the video was Richard Gage information-less pile of doo-doo.

    Thermite looks like this watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw and only burns up/down not horizontally like to cut beams.

    So none of this was seen with Trade 7? or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6. What brought them down?

    So again no missiles/PODS right? So isn't this video you are commenting on dis-information by your definition? trying to convince people there were missiles involved? Criminal by your own words?

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ No, if this video is correct i.e., undoctored, then it should be submitted as evidence in a criminal court case.

    Gage is awesome; you are just being childish.

    WTC 3, 4, 5, 6, -- were not brought down by CD, therefore not topics for discussion.

    WTC 7 was brought down as an implosion. This can be proven in court. OS is therefore LIES. You FAIL!

  • @ucancallmeOh But your evidence is so convincing that it is thermite how is this possible to be missiles? If this could be so easily proven in court how come after 10 years no one has done that?

    So 3,4, and 5 were not thermite but "natural" collapses? How can explain that?

    Why is your thermite sparks example only on tower 2 and not 1 and 7?

    What about the pentagon? Thermite? Missiles? or a plane crash?

    You call me childish? Don't you see how foolish this makes you look?

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ Honestly, people like you literally make me sick. You act like it's a game or something. This country is morally and financially bankrupt as a result of 9/11. It's not a game. You are spinning and twisting people's words, but it's just a stupid waste of my time.

    As for the plane/ missle thing: I don't know. Is it a trick from the perpatraitors to lead the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false track to make it look foolish? Is is real? I don't know. I do know OS=LIES.

  • @ucancallmeOh I totally agree its not a game. That is why when people fabric facts with video tricks they turn it into a game.

    So if the "missile theory" is in doubt with you why is it less legitimate than the "airplanes and fire theory" or the "explosives" theory? Do you get how hypocritical you are?

    What about the pentagon? Thermite?

    Again like the psychologist say about truthers: You started with the premise that the govt. is behind it. Then fabricate reality to support this.

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ You are a PAID DISINFORMATION AGENT. You are not intellectually honest because you have an agenda of self-interest.

    All anyone has to know to be a truther is that the OS (Official Story) contains at least one lie. Like most (mass) murder cases, all the details are not known before a trial, but what is known is that the accused's story does not jibe with the evidence.

    Bring on a criminal court case! YOU are an accessory to mass murder.

  • Comment removed

  • @ucancallmeOh Wow "PAID DISINFORMATION AGENT" "YOU are an accessory to mass murder."

    So is this video a Lie? Criminal according to your definition?

    Wouldn't the Official story just be another cause to investigate like:

    Thermite

    Explosives

    Missiles (which you say it couldn't be right?)

    So if you are going to court what evidence are you bringing? You know Jones won't share his dust for anyone else to validate.

    Have you read the NIST report?

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ re: Missles: I never said "it couldn't be". The 9/11 Truth Movement has more than enough evidence for a mass murder trial and charges of starting wars without cause. That evidence is strongest regarding WTC 7's collapse and the nano-thermite and iron microspheres found in the dust of the WTC. We don't know all the facts, but we have that evidence. The full truth will come out in a trial.

    We need to overcome the obstacle of silence/ bias by the mainstream media.

  • @ucancallmeOh "We don't know all the facts, but we have that evidence." What does that mean?

    You said yourself it is thermite and all other theories are lies and criminal.

    Have you read the NIST report?

    If it is so cut-dried why won't Harrit/Jones share their samples/data with other scientists?

    They have proven the Microspheres existed in the concrete (in all concrete) before 9/11.

    You have no evidence.

  • @ucancallmeOh "We don't know all the facts, but we have that evidence." What does that mean?

    You said yourself it is thermite and all other theories are lies and criminal.

    Have you read the NIST report?

    If it is so cut-dried why won't Harrit/Jones share their samples/data with other scientists?

    Still thinking how to answer??

  • @ae911truthcensors ~ NIST, a subdivision of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Zelikow, from the Chamber headed the Official 9/11 Commission and controlled the content of their report. NIST did not check for explosives in the dust of the WTC even though there was a bomb blast from a terrorist in '93 and testimony of explosives on 9/11. NIST won't share its model of collapse, which only goes to "initiation". This is OBVIOUS cover-up.

  • @ucancallmeOh

    Harrit/Jones won't share their samples of Dust or Data that they say proves nano-thermite. Obvious cover-up.

    Do you check for explosives after a car crash? No because its obvious what happened.

    They did check the steel for general evidence. And found nothing that indicated temperatures over 1500C, explosive damage, cutting/etc.

    So by your definition isn't the author of this video committing a crime claiming it was a missile When you have evidence it was thermite?

  • @ucancallmeOh Go to this video called 9/11 Coincidences (11/19) Uploaded by @NuffRespect2 right now. This is a very big debate.

  • @ae911truthcensors You have seen massive amounts of evidence debunking the official conspiracy theory of 9/11. You have seen tons of proof that the official story is a mountain of outright lies.

  • @ae911truthcensors However you still can not believe that your beloved president or his administration would do anything that bad to Americans. Well meet the neocons! Understand their philosophy and you will understand why you should suspect these people of being involved in the events of September 11th, 2001.

  • @ae911truthcensors The official conspiracy theory that was told to us by the government about the 19 hijackers are lies and deceptions. You people don't even have the courage to stand up and think for yourselves. You are very good at believing in lies. You are very good at that aren't you?

  • @MrMelodia89 Wow so I did some word-matching. It looks like you are the same person as Azar/Hotters/Tricky1ish/AlexJo­nes/others.

    How sad the real deception and lies are from a "truther"

  • psychologytoday.co m/blog/the-narcissus-in-all-us­/200809/paranoia-and-the-roots­-conspiracy-theories

    Great article that explains to a tee how truthers think. The nastiness, belief in things that can't be proven, everything. Fits like a glove. So I guess this is some kind of mental illness..

  • @ae911truthcensors What the Hell are you talking about? What about the 2 extra bombs that were found in the Alfred P. Murrah Building during the Oklahoma City Boming in 1995? Yes Timothy McVeigh had bombs in the Riders truck, but what about the other 2 explosives devices that were found in the Alfred P. Murrah Building? That right there is another cover up!

  • questionsquestions.n et/WTC/pod.ht ml

    I can't believe people wast time trying to twist images to fit a fairy-tail of what happened.

    It is disgusting..

  • watch?v=trfCyvLAQd8

    Psychologists Help 9/11 Truth Deniers

  • Great insight on the psychology of truthers:

    psychologytoday.co m/blog/the-narcissus-in-all-us­/200809/paranoia-and-the-roots­-conspiracy-theories

    It really explains these characters insistence on believing something without proof. Fits Azar's behavior perfectly.

  • @ae911truthcensors Use your common sense. Do you think the global intelligence powers failed this badly? Do you think men who could barely pilot a 2 seat plane can navigate across several states and find their target? Are you that gullible? Have some self respect, and think before you believe what you are told.

  • @CNNFootage67 "Have some self respect"?

    Who bombed the towers in 1993? Did intelligence fail then?

    Khobar towers? Same question on intelligence.

    Looks like the US had a bad intelligence track record.

    So if it wasn't terrorist what was it? What is your fairy-tail of what happened?

    Can you provide 10 fact points to back this up? Time for you to use some common sense and stop believe lies from Griffin/Gage/etc.

  • Wow too bad you guys are all morons. United 767's had a stripe down the belly of the plain.

    How could you get so worked up over this and not do a simple google search to prove/disprove what you are looking at?

    ht tp://cdn-w ww.airliners.n et/aviation-photos/photos/6/4/­1/0395146.j pg

  • @ae911truthcensors What is your problem dude? Listen 9/11 was an inside job and the biggest deception in the world so why do you Fuckers continue to support the BullShit story told by the government?

    Why can't you people learn to think for yourselves? You believe in everything that people tell you instead of looking for answers. Jesus Christ dude you people will never learn.

  • @CNNFootage67 So did you look at the picture of a 767 belly?

    Did you start with the concept 911 was a conspiracy first and then fill in evidence to support it? Or did you find evidence first?

    Give me your top 10 evidence points that it wasn't airplanes and terrorists. Just 10. Not some video of the building falling or paint-chips people call nano-thermite but real evidence. One det-cord found. One piece of steel heated to 4000C. Anything..

  • @ae911truthcensors Well the conspiracy stories told by your government about the 19 hijackers and the collapse of the World Trade Center are lies. There is plenty of evidence to prove that we were never told the the truth about 9/11. I can't believe that 10 years later you people are still with the BullShit. Come on man get it through your skull that 9/11 was not what the government says it was.

  • @CNNFootage67 So here is the problem. Just because you say that doesn't come close to making it true. Can you show me any of this "plenty of evidence"? I am going to bet you can't/won't.

    10 years later and you people can't produce 5 points of evidence it wasn't terrorists.

    You still believe in fairy-tails told to you by master manipulators like Griffin/Gage. All without any facts. How silly this makes you look

  • @CNNFootage67 "Listen 9/11 was an inside job and the biggest deception in the world so why do you Fuckers continue to support the BullShit story told by the government?"

    You must be with Azar and His Fake Brothers. They write exactly like this, and your account was created yesterday. Coincidentally. Hmm

    What evidence? What can prove the government did this? NONE

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 I am not Azar so please don't go there. Why is it than when people don't agree with you guys, you accuse people of being something that they are not? I have my own account and this my friend is new. Azar closed his account a long ago so I don't know what you are talking about.

  • @CNNFootage67 Because it's very coindental that, Hotters, Superhero, Wildhawks,azar, mrmelodia, alexjones and you, 4 of which whom are brothers, all believe the same nonsense, all write the same? Wierd Huh?

    This is getting ridicilous, what evidence is there prove it?

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 So just because people on youtube agree on one thing does not mean that they are the same person. They can be different people with the same kinds of opinions. You are the one being ridicilous and stupid.

  • @CNNFootage67 I also said it was coincidental. You might not know this, But Azar, Hotters, Superhero, Mrmelodia(which i'm sure is azar) and the rest.

    All Like the same things, i've seen their channels before we all hid them from that dumb fuck that was impersonating people.

    1. They all want the twins rebuilt.

    2. All Like these trains called The Red's , or something like that

    3. All believe that 911 was planned.

    4. All are on at the same times.

    Call It a coincident, you may, but maybe not

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 No coincidence they are all one in the same. It is really scary someone is that psychotic to spend all their time inventing IDs/personalities/etc.

  • @ae911truthcensors They are. I've reported azar and hotters before, and they all go on mental rages. It's sad, that truthers have to create multipe accounts just to get their point across. That's why I only have a total of 3 truther friends that i can have a reasonable discussion with

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 You reported Azar and Garinagu92 because you are stupid. You used some profanity towards these 2 guys and than you want to cry like the baby that you are just because they are trying to defend themselves. If you don't have anything nice to say to people don't say anything at all.

  • @CNNFootage67 I reported them because they were retarded and annoying. When i said that the i wanted to end the debate, they followed me to different videos, stop taking their sides, they are retards

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 And you should not go around saying that Azar, Hotters, Supehero, and Alexjones67 are the same people. You should be ashamed of yourself for telling lies about these guys. So what if they all like the same things. What does it matter? And why do you even worry about people?

  • @CNNFootage67 "what does it matter"

    Be Honest, Wouldn't you be pissed if you suspected that multiple users were the same person?

    How Would You Feel?

    What's the purpose?

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 You know something it doesn't mean that just because everybody has the same opinion or agrees on the same thing that they are the same people. It doesn't work that way.

    I understand how you feel about these guys but they are brothers in real life. You have to understand that.

  • @CNNFootage67 That's hard to believe.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 I understand how you feel because all of us are human beings but you can't always think that people are the same just because they have similiar ideas or thoughts.

    That is the way life is. There are times when I have the same interest as another person does but does that mean that I am the same as him or her? NO of course not.

  • @CNNFootage67 Yeah, but the difference is , they are ALL BROTHERS.

    Wierd how they like the same things, take the same interest, write the same, have a extreme use of exclamation marks.

    Coincidence it might be.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Yes they are brothers and they have their own accounts. To each his own. So what if each of these guys have their own opinion about the same topic.

  • @CNNFootage67 Maybe so..

  • @CNNFootage67 Maybe so..

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Airplanes did crash into the World Trade Center, and we understand that. What we don't understand is why did the Twin Towers fall at free fall speed and building 7 collapsed like a controlled demolition. The government's story cannot be true because no skyscraper has ever collapsed because of fires or plane crashes.

  • @MrMelodia89 The Twin Towers did not fall down at free fall speeds. The Core of the North And South Tower remained almost 30 seconds after the collapse of the outer walls and and floors. Meaning that the complete collapse of the twins took almost 50 seconds.

    "No skyscraper has ever collapsed because of fires or plane crashes"

    What Building do you know was hit with a 767 at the speed of 590 mph? Get real dude.

    There is always a first to something, fires engulfed entire floors, seen in tower 1.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Osama Bin Laden had no involvement in the attacks of 9/11. Bin Laden and the 19 hijackers were just used as a cover up to the reality that these attacks were planned by the elements of the U.S. Government here in the United States.

  • @superhero6734100 Don't give me that. I want proof

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 ~ Okay, big guy.  Here's your proof. If I can understand this, you can!

    watch?v=-GUTmmqfmyg

    WTC 7 Freefall by David Chandler

    This is an updated version. I think he explains it really well. Please provide feedback. Thanks.

  • @ucancallmeOh Uh, You Do Know That This is BANTRUTHERS911?To prove so, i was discussing about my son's catholic school closing.

    One Thing I noticed with the David mentions the roofline to be 925 feet tall. Building 7 was 610 feet. Where did he get that number, maybe their is something i'm not understanding

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 ~ Yes, I knew that was you.

    "925 feet tall roofline" -- I don't know, man. I made an inquiry about it, but it might take a little time to find out. Good question!

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 A theory consistent with the evidence was revealed in March 2002 to Carol Valentine by an informant (as recounted in 9-11: The Flight of the Bumble Planes).

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 A plot was hatched, not by Arabs, but by so-called Americans (agents of the civilian "state security and intelligence" agencies and bureaus such as the CIA, top-ranking officers within the U.S. Air Force and high-level officials within the U.S. administration), perhaps with Israeli (Mossad) involvement:

  • @ucancallmeOh By the way, i said the twins didn't fall at free fall, not building 7.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 ~ Sorry about that. My bad. They were close, but not "free fall".

  • Comment removed

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Well AlexJones67s sent me a PM to this video so I am guessing he is the same as Azar/Hotters/etc. too. This is just weird.

  • Why has there not been justice for 9/11?

    Here is an interview with Mr. Ray McGovern, a former top CIA analyst who worked directly for four presidents. He speaks about the push to war with Iran, starting from Israel. What does this have to do with 9/11? Everything. Mossad was very involved in 9/11.

    Mr. McGovern's statements about 9/11 can be found on the website Patriotsquestion911(dot)com.

    watch?v=nG5xCDH6NLw

    Betrayal of the Founders (3 parts = 30 min. appx.)

  • This is BAN911TRUTHERS I decided there is no reason for controversial usernames. so this is me. Reply to all comments and inbox to me.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Check out some videos for the following 9/11 witnesses who were at the World Trade Center during the attacks.

    Philip Morale

    Marlene Cruz

    Mike Pecaroa

  • To Address something that many truthers keep mentioning. The "Pancake Theory" is incorrect,and was not in the Final Report. The Floor Trusses did not melt, and pull from their connections. They pulled on the outerwall and caused bowing as much as five feet . Seconds before the south tower collapse, the outer wall experinced severe bowing. We see in rare footage shot by a witness a line of columns snap, causing the collapse. The columns can't handle the weight and we see a progressive collapse.

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 Why did the 9/11 Commission Report omit the information about the drills, making only 1 mention of them in a single footnote. The report only mentioned 1 drill, and falsely described it as a drill to defend against Russian Bombers.

  • @Hotters706043 Asking Me why.......... Doesn't prove anything

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 All of us - individuals and nations - have fictitious myths that we create, believe, and weave our identities into. We have all invented some aspect of ourselves, or the world, that we desperately want to believe, often despite ample evidence pointing to the absurdity and falseness of the created myth.

  • @wild0hawks This Prove?

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 There is a massive amount of evidence that the World Trade Center Twin Towers and building 7 were destroyed with explosives. It is obvious that plane crashes no matter how serious the damage inside of a skycraper is, cannot do any demolition.

  • @CNNFootage67 Explosives makes noises bro.  Controlled demoltions do not damage surronding structures. Wtc 7 damaged 2 buildings that I'm aware of.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Building 7 has all of the characteristics of a controlled demolition. You people are too dumb to realize anything. Building 7 and the Twin Towers were all rigged for demolition.

  • @CNNFootage67 If we're going to start the insults, then this discussion will be over.

    "You people are to dumb......."

    Anyhow. Building 7 does not have all the characteristics of a controlled demoltion.

    I've showed you a demoltion and these two look nothing alike,

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 Oh my God please don't make this any difficult than what it already is. I am getting sick and tired of this. We can't even have a good conversation all because stupid people like @ravensfan2058 is interrupting us.

  • @CNNFootage67 Wait, Wait! I'm not ravensfan.

  • @EDuCaTIOniSkEy2012 I am not trying to insult you anymore. I am just here to talk 9/11 truth with you.

  • @CNNFootage67 Sure. Go right ahead.

  • @CNNFootage67 You Must Know This. I am ravensfan, and I've a change. I am not a truther. I've now see the evil in the government. I know realize that this was an attack by the US.

    I'm sorry ,and no longer want to fight with azar and his brothers.

  • @CNNFootage677 I don't believe a word you say ravensfan! You don't mean what you say. You are not sorry for what you did to azar or any of the brothers. You are lying and I won't fall for it.

  • @CNNFootage67 Well. Goodbye i'm not going to do anymore impersonations

  • @CNNFootage677 You are lying and will always be a liar. I will never fall for these kinds of tricks. I am not stupid for you or anybody out there. You are fooling yourself and wasting your time Ravensfan!

  • @CNNFootage67 Yes. I'll become friends with you

  • Comment removed

  • @Puppetmaster195skc Hey puppet friend me man! Friend me right now.

  • @superhero6734100 Unblock your channel.

    How ya been superhero?

  • @Puppetmaster195skc Ravensfan2058 is trying to follow me on this video because I made a comment to him today. Tomorrow morning I will unblock my channel so that you can friend me. I want to be friends with you.

    I had to block my channel because Ravensfan2058 is trying to follow us.

  • @Puppetmaster195skc You can friend me now puppet. My channel is unblocked now.

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 WTC Building 7, a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper located one block from the Twin Towers was not hit by any plane, but collapsed at 5:20 that evening, imploding in the exact manner of a professionally engineered demolition.

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 It fell suddenly, straight down, at near freefall speed, and landed in a compact pile of rubble, barely damaging any of the surrounding buildings. These are but a few of eleven characteristics of Building 7's collapse that are consistent only with controlled demolitions.

  • @Alexjones67s Controlled Demoltions are designed to not damage surronding structures.

    World Trade Center 7 Did Much Damage to Fittermans hall and the Verizon building.

    watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA Here is a video of world trade center 7's collapse. No explosives heard.

    watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ Here is a controlled demoltion. Flashes and explosives heard

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 It was not passenger jets that hit the World Trade Center. There are people who were in New York City who saw the airplane hit the South Tower close up and they said that the airplane appeared to be gray and black. That is what they witnessed @BAN9/11TRUTHERNOW890!

  • @MrMelodia89 Oh Really? So Your Going to say that the people on the planes and the viticms familes are lying about where they were at the morning of september 11.

    Ok , Good Luck proving that one

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 ~ If you can handle two discussions at once... I will absolutely check out your video or whatever you have about progressive collapse. But going to what @MrMelodia89 said about the planes being gray and black: That's in this video that we're on.  Please check it out.

    Also, Colonel Nelson, featured in this video, is one of the first entries on Patriotsquestion911(dot)com -- an amazing website.

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 ~ There was no "progressive collapse". Pancake Theory is progressive collapse.

    NIST: “NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers…"

    This is from this article: "Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction" by Steven E. Jones, et al.

    Google the title-- that's the easiest way to find it.

  • @ucancallmeOh A progressive collapse is when primary elements fail, causing a collapse. Pankcake collaspe is when the floors hit each other one by one.

    The Floors failed, which is a primary element. The pulled their columns.

    Let me find a video that shows when the moment of failure occured.

    BRB

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 Check out some videos of the following 9/11 survivors who were in the World Trade Center and try to tell the media that the story of 19 hijackers is a lie. Here are names of the following witnesses of the WTC attacks.

    Philip Morale

    Marlene Cruz

    Mike Pecaroa

  • @roquefortfiles Here is proof that thermite can cut steel, this is a video done by the Discovery Channel.

    At 50 seconds to 56 seconds into this video. You can clearly hear the narrator say that it's used for comercial demolitons and bombs

    Take a look for yourself

    watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ

  • Comment removed

  • Alrighty I'm Here. Didn't come back for Round Two of Tom Foolery and annoyance. So Truthers, what's up

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 To account for the damaged zone, let’s simulate the floor beams collapsing every 10th floor, as if something has destroyed 9 out of every 10 floors for the entire height of the building.

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 This assumes there is no resistance within each 10-floor interval. i.e. We use the conservative approach that there is no resistance between floor impacts. In reality there is, which would slow the collapse time further. Also, there was only damage in one 10-floor interval, not the entire height of the building.

  • @Alexjones67s This Proves what?

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 In the age of ICBMs, are we to believe that we have to practice defending the nation against Russian bombers in the north eastern portion of the US?

    Why have the news media neglected to inform the public of Cheney’s actions that day?

  • Comment removed

  • @BAN911TRUTHERNOW890 Osama Bin Laden was just used as a cover up to keep people from knowing the real truth behind the attacks of September 11, 2001.

  • @superhero6734100 OF FUCKING COURSE! He isn't going to admit he planned and carried out the biggest attacks on America. Killing 3000? Mass MURDER!! He'd never admit to something like that.

  • @roquefortfiles- Hey Man! Me and my Brothers came here to fight because someone keeps impersonating me and my brothers.So We Should Be Safe Here.

    Ready To Talk Some 911?

  • Hello Fellow Truthers and Debunkers.

  • @Puppetmaster195skc We are here to spread the truth brother. Lets spread the truth together so that we can get our country back. Lets not let the government ruin this for us.

    Do you want to become friends with me?

  • @CNNFootage67 YEAH!

  • @CNNFootage677 Stop impersonating me. Leave me the Fuck alone!

  • @CNNFootage67 911 was a false flag attempt to invade iraq and iran. But I'm gone.

  • How could FL 175 not have been a commercial airliner? one might ask.

    Google: Operation Northwoods, check out item# 8. There it is, from 50 years ago.

  • @ucancallmeOh Flight 175 was not a commercial airliner and it is seen that something was under the belly of that airplane. That is not shown on a normal commerical aircraft. How could people not see this?

  • @Hotters706043 What Proof is there that can prove that it was not a commercial aircraft?

  • FL175 = not a commercial airliner

    FL 77= no video footage from Pentagon (except 'the blur'); did not have activated air phones and high altitude phone calls did not happen

    FL93= Experts have stated that the black mark is too small for a commercial airliner; many have spoken of parts miles away; Rumsfeld slip of the tongue "shot down"

    WTC buildings= dust with unexploded nano-thermite and iron microspheres

    WTC7= not hit by plane; down in less than 7 seconds

    When will there be 9/11 JUSTICE?!?

  • Flight 11 and flight 175 were all military airplanes. The crash at the Pentagon site was done by a missle and not by flight 77! We are not being told the truth about the attacks of September 11, 2001. We need a new and independant investigation into these events. 9/11 was done so that we can go to war and kill innocent people and take their resources.

  • What about the people who were supposedly on that second plane?

    Do we not have their names to back the story that it was a commercial airline airplane?

  • @LadyCassandra00001 9/11 is not what the government says it is. Everything that we have been told about 9/11 are lies. Building 7 collapsed at free fall speed and the Pentagon was never hit flight 77.

  • United airlines boeing 767 and flight 175 are the same underneath. Passengers flown off to a millitary base and never heard of again? Yes very realistic. Dopes.

  • Now why would that lady have any reason to think that it was Arerican Airlines?

  • Its not E-10, the protruding object is real, but notice how on the E-10 its up near the front past the wings? Well on that plane its between the wings.

  • The original planes are laying in the bottom of the Atlantic ocean. The planes that hit were probably remote control dupes. Nearly impssible I know...but someone should do some sort of search of the atlantic ocean...lol I bet they'd find all the planes...at least whats left of em.

  • @Cap420 hmm...you think that's what happened? According to "911 Missing Links" the planes were remotely controlled o_O /watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4

  • eternal question:) where is the pasengers right:??

    well i will give the most sincerr answer an this..

    i dont know where is the passengers..

    and im realy sorry for the victims families:(

    whatever hapenned arabs or conspiracy..

    enythng y say i dont have those people came back in life.. the most beautiful dreams i will want ther be alive i want:X

  • is it just me,I hope not,but,,do I see three pods here?,I see the small pod that everyone is talking about,yes,also,it looks to me to be on top of a much bigger pod with another right beside it :O,that makes 3,right!,,,compare flight 175 to the normal Boeing 757 clip at 4;47,then count,there are 3 pods not just 1,,,does anyone else see this??

  • i think that this is entirely possible.....but im not at all convinced that this is what went down that day

    

  • just watched another video that showed the same scenes excepct one showing AIR FORCE ON THE SIDE and toward the end of the video it shows the back with a boom down refueling another aircraft it was a KC135 THESE VIDEOS ARE COMPLETE BULLSHIT

  • thats not airliner type in B763

  • they should re-do the whole 911 crash without people and see if the same thing happens