I'm glad he didn't get nominated for an oscar because he was too good for Hollywood. He always won at Venice and at Cannes and that is a testament to the man. If I was a director I would much rather european accolades than american ones.
"The artist exists because the world is not perfect." - My favorite Tarkovsky quote, and a recurring thought in my own pursuits. His was a singular brilliance, the kind that is fast becoming extinct.
Thanks for posting this. It will be nice to be able to come to this clip now and then and remember what it means to create fearlessly.
"Figures likes Tarkovsky have made some beautiful films but he is, I fear, too much the darling of French intellectuals, something I suspect he worked a little bit towards." - Werner Herzog
@bezoomyazure Herzog is a hack... Also, his OPINION is virtually worthless as it relates to Tarkovsky's artistic integrity, his motives, etc. Herzog is just jealous of a real genius...
I've put a Limited Edition DVD of my film, "Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky" onto Amazon. Only 300 singed and numbered copies available. Please help spread the word about this independent film dedicated to the maestro!
The problem I have with Tarkovsky (and most philosophical movies) is that since these films are different, hard to understand, and slow, viewers will automatically praise it as a masterpiece while more linear mainstream stories are just bashed as pieces of garbage. I love most Tarkosvky films but I personally found Stalker and Nostalgia to be totally overrated, beautiful imagery and symbolism but not much else. Tarkosvky himself praised The Terminator and his only complaint was the acting...
Symbolism is unimportant.The film as a whole with all your subjectivity makes it art.
''linear'' movies usually are made to look good, to entertain the mainstream and often have no real ideas behind. too straight, obvious, conventional- unreal.
I love Tarkovski... But f.ex. i also love ''Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas''
so i dont have to compare it and say what is garbage. It are two different things.
One is more Poetry the other Party... ;). Both can be ''masterpieces''
@bobb328 Id also laugh about people who talk about a ''masterpiece'' only because they have a clichee of what a masterpiece has to look like. ^^ in fact they wouldn't even understand the true spirit of that...
@malingsia Same here. I am stuck. Can't watch any other film for more than 5 minutes. And that includes bergman, kurosawa, italians... I bought a pass for an American Film Institute Festival and managed to watch one single film. No professional actors. Five plus a lamb and a baby. Forgot the name though.
Podemos decir quizás que Andrei hacía arte y por eso su cine sigue emocionando mientras que muchos otros directores de cine se han quedado ahí , simplemente en la denominación "director de cine" y poco más. De todas formas si algo distinto hay en su discurso es precisamente que éste es tan sumamente rico que no cabe el perder tiempo alguno tildando su ego ni adjetivándolo. Podemos dedicarnos a separar su discurso de su persona por más unido que se encuentre, y hablar sólo de la obra.
Tarkovsky is a poet, Instead of choosing each word carefuly, he looks for the perfect image. His films are perfect. He only made 7 feature films because he didn't work, he was creating a universe.
I agree, you cannot pass on experiences. But you can give advice on, prepare for or provide backup after certain ones. It is not as if life is meaningless to future generations, isn't it? Reminds me of that parable of a young tree in "Stalker", today I think it is one-sided and wrong.
I disagree that you cannot force people to feel suggested emotions, you can see that each day in the mass media. Emotion is evoked for certain purposes, as emotion is stronger than reason.
@Nyveg I do not believe it is neccessary or even right to manipulate others. All one can say is this is the way I see it. Only megalomaniacs claim to be other's gods and therefore know what others should or how they should behave. Nobody needs to be spoonfed by, teachers, preachers and other such creatures.
Four more screenings of the award-winning documentary 'Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky' in LA: Monica 4-Plex, Santa Monica (Feb. 6,7 at 11AM) and Playhouse 7, Pasadena (Feb. 6,7 at 11AM). See you there!
to that extent ('not taking in suggestet emotions'), I do belive this is the true nature of an artist, and it´s quite complicated to act and do things in those therms, life is complicated, but, I do belive he set an example, and maybe sacrificed himself, in the name of life. Just beutiful, not as a saint, but as a crazy guy with a lot of ideas and the energy to execute them. Celebrate Tarkovski, sometimes, he´s films makes us humans after all.
He is not the only, respect to other film makers such as Bunuel, Bresson, Antonioni, Vigo, Ozu, Kurosawa, Pasolini, Dreyer, Lang, Bergman and more... They are the people who influenced Tarkovsky. Tarkovsky is a great cinematographer bot there are also other masters and styles...
Oh, Please. A figure of speech, expressing my admiration for the guy. Cut the 'Masters of Film' polyanna bullshit, go to whatever academic valhalla you live in, stick a straw up your ass, suck on it and disappear.
...........Tarkovsky gets right, we struggle BECAUSE we have no control over anything..so as we try to understand our plight, the ceiling is falling, Fire, Apples, Wind, Fog and etc.. all
You are missing something "kingofskateop". Yes, there are other masters out there, certainly Kurosawa, Bergman, Ozu and etc... All other directors seem to subscribe to the old religion beliefs in which this world was created for us. Watch all the directors you have name and you will see a passive background. Nature is just there.
I've watched nearly every director's movie that I can, and I'm still watching them again and again. Tarkovsky is a strong director who showed us the real power of cinema: "the pure language of cinema" that can affect "the unconscious/existence" of all human... But he couldn't reached that true language too, (he was so close with the "Mirror" and the "Stalker" but a real cinema should reach from children to the adults (like Bazin said). The editing should flow with the same speed of heart beats..
I am fascinated. To my knowledge, he is the only one that succeeded in focusing on the mechanism of life in its relationships between single human beings and different generations. He is a real philosopher. Accordingly, he was a great director. Lov u, maestro Tarkovskij...
Tarkovsky's Sculpting in Time, best book ever. Should be standard reading in cinema and art classes. If you're at all interested in Tarkovsky, cinema or art in general it's a must read. Very simply and honestly written, but has much wisdom.
It is interesting to hear Tarkovski. I know his films and know that there are so much to think when watching them. I have, however, never seen a film where Tarkovski tells about his ideas.
He is definitely one of the men from the past I would like to discuss with.
The greatest since the 7th Art beginnings. Firt he was boring me...until I came to understand...then, he fascinated me, since I've realised his movies were living memories... but from the future! Thanks for posting the Poet own words. As a prophet, he stands alone.
I should like to say that Tarkovsky was most probably the best of directors; and yet I do prefer Pasolini as a film maker. I not sure why that is so. Much of Pasolini's stuff is indeed political and aesthetic pretension. Maybe Tarkovsky's films seem a little too constructed and precise (notwithstanding the fact that Pasolini hung over the shoulder of every cinematographer he ever met). I just don't understand myself.
tarkovsky gerçekten tanıdığım en büyük yönetmenlerden biri.çoğu çalışmamda bana ilham verdi.özellikle şu filmi demek istemiyorum.çünkü bütün filmleri birbirinden muhteşemdir.sovyet sineması değil de mesela isveç ya da hollywood'da yönetmenlik yapıyor olsaydı bu kadar değerli bir noktada olmazdı.bu da sovyetlere bok atıp duranlara cevap olsun...
Please check out the trailer to my short independent film-it's available on my channel. It's heavily influenced by Tarkovsky, although I do not claim to have achieved anywhere near his level of poignancy.
he said some really meaningful things there...it's true that you can't learn from someone else's experience, you need to experience everything first hand.
Yeah, poor souls who don't sound smart - that's what we are, as well as our dead and living compatriots, like Dostoevsky, Chekhov, Tolstoy, Tarkovsky etc etc
Andréï Roublev One of my favorite film and Tarkovski, my favorite films director. Purée, qu'est ce que je l'aime cet homme de génie, si fascinant, il faut absolument lire le Temps Scellé !
Great thanks for posting this video, youtube offers a great opportunity to communicate and share such videos, wich I'd harly see otherwise - not because of copyright, but the ignorance of they existence. Tarkovsky is one of the few who makes me feel proud that I'm russian.
Besides, if you interested in Tarkovsky's "Director's Lections Course" (in russian, sorry) -e-mail me.
Tarkovsky was closest to the notion of a genius in cinema. There were none before him, and unfortunately they won't be anymore... regretfully. Its my dream to see a film that approaches in importance and eloquence great novels of our and past centuries, but there are no such films. Tarkovsky was the only one to breach this barrier and was able to create body of work that paralleled in importance, eloquence, beauty, and mastery other bodies of work in such established art form as literature.
Well, I dunno man. Kubrick ranks high if not higher in my opinion. Actually, I dont rank, forget that. Its not fair to rank art. But seriously, Kubrick is a genius.
i've read that tarkovsky didn't think much of kubricks films - especially 2001 (often compared to solaris)... but i've never found any trace of what kubrick may have thought of tarkovsky's work... i reckon he would've loved it - and felt quite in awe of what tarkovsky was achieving... but he would not feel in any way inferior to him..
I first fell in love with film through Kubrick. However, I did not realize until I had seen all of Tarkovsky's films that while Kubrick is a technical master, Tarkovsky is one of the only true poets of film.
TARKOVSKY is the greatest filmmaker that ever lived. With only 7 films, he accomplished what many of today's directors don't even dream about. Stalker and Sacrifice are my favorite films.
I named my son Andrei after him. Tarkovski was put on this earth to make his 7 films and touch our souls.
I'm glad he didn't get nominated for an oscar because he was too good for Hollywood. He always won at Venice and at Cannes and that is a testament to the man. If I was a director I would much rather european accolades than american ones.
cedrictrent 1 month ago
The greatest film maker and a good human being
TimeAndTheImage 3 months ago
He is my favorite.
MikeAdupont 4 months ago
Tarkovsky is poetry film maker, no has comparision, Mirror or Zerkalo is one of marterpierce on 20th century.
dbnovaro 4 months ago 2
I am currently studying philosophy. I've learned more on aesthetics from him, then from many philosophers... Tarkovsky is a genius, period
Zosologospage 6 months ago 2
"The artist exists because the world is not perfect." - My favorite Tarkovsky quote, and a recurring thought in my own pursuits. His was a singular brilliance, the kind that is fast becoming extinct.
Thanks for posting this. It will be nice to be able to come to this clip now and then and remember what it means to create fearlessly.
TheWanderingPrimate 7 months ago 5
While I disagree with what Herzog said, the guy ain't no hack.
DoctorBenway101 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yaaaawn
HILLBILLYMORON 9 months ago
Tarkovsky and Kurosawa can be called geniuses of movie industry.
danijeelm8 9 months ago 2
@danijeelm8 damn right bro!agree100%
holicat098 5 months ago
I wonder what this is an excerpt from ;)
CompuGlobalHyper 9 months ago
Comment removed
earinsound 5 months ago
i love rublev....but yeah there is also wim wenders with wings of desire...
rajsingharora1 9 months ago
wow he is the best
artmiss7 10 months ago
Tarkovsky & Kubrick- no one else comes close
HungerCultFilms 10 months ago 3
My 3 out of 5 all time favorite films are by Tarkovsky. (And Rublev is not one of them!) A sage and a poet of the first water.
Mazurka1001 11 months ago
"Figures likes Tarkovsky have made some beautiful films but he is, I fear, too much the darling of French intellectuals, something I suspect he worked a little bit towards." - Werner Herzog
bezoomyazure 11 months ago 2
@bezoomyazure Herzog is a hack... Also, his OPINION is virtually worthless as it relates to Tarkovsky's artistic integrity, his motives, etc. Herzog is just jealous of a real genius...
rgs11 8 months ago
I LOVE THIS MAN. I AGREE WITH OTHERS, IN THAT TO ME HE IS IN A WORLD APART FROM OTHER FILMMAKERS.
cheminwey 11 months ago
Where is this from?
hellswinter 1 year ago
Tarkovsky is a cinematic miracle.
ateniense7 1 year ago 2
I've put a Limited Edition DVD of my film, "Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky" onto Amazon. Only 300 singed and numbered copies available. Please help spread the word about this independent film dedicated to the maestro!
trakovskyfilm 1 year ago
Tarkovsky is probably my overall favorite filmmaker. But Bresson is on par. Without Bresson, there'd be no Tarkovsky.
jpastuch 1 year ago
Greenaway?
TongueCathedral 1 year ago
The problem I have with Tarkovsky (and most philosophical movies) is that since these films are different, hard to understand, and slow, viewers will automatically praise it as a masterpiece while more linear mainstream stories are just bashed as pieces of garbage. I love most Tarkosvky films but I personally found Stalker and Nostalgia to be totally overrated, beautiful imagery and symbolism but not much else. Tarkosvky himself praised The Terminator and his only complaint was the acting...
bobb328 1 year ago
@bobb328
Symbolism is unimportant.The film as a whole with all your subjectivity makes it art.
''linear'' movies usually are made to look good, to entertain the mainstream and often have no real ideas behind. too straight, obvious, conventional- unreal.
I love Tarkovski... But f.ex. i also love ''Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas''
so i dont have to compare it and say what is garbage. It are two different things.
One is more Poetry the other Party... ;). Both can be ''masterpieces''
paranapoleon 1 year ago
@bobb328 Id also laugh about people who talk about a ''masterpiece'' only because they have a clichee of what a masterpiece has to look like. ^^ in fact they wouldn't even understand the true spirit of that...
paranapoleon 1 year ago
@paranapoleon Exactly!! But personally I like a mix of "poetry and party" like Kubrick.
bobb328 1 year ago 3
i hate Him for some reason, because he change my view of art and film, and i can't stand all of hollywood sh!t because of it.
malingsia 1 year ago 2
@malingsia Same here. I am stuck. Can't watch any other film for more than 5 minutes. And that includes bergman, kurosawa, italians... I bought a pass for an American Film Institute Festival and managed to watch one single film. No professional actors. Five plus a lamb and a baby. Forgot the name though.
openmindset 1 year ago
I hate the word "pretentious" when somebody pretends to do something good they call them pretencious.
niduba 1 year ago
He's a bit pretentious
miiwiiplay 1 year ago
@miiwiiplay not pretentious at all. This is passion
Vesters1 1 year ago
Genius of cinema !
Indoom11782 1 year ago
Podemos decir quizás que Andrei hacía arte y por eso su cine sigue emocionando mientras que muchos otros directores de cine se han quedado ahí , simplemente en la denominación "director de cine" y poco más. De todas formas si algo distinto hay en su discurso es precisamente que éste es tan sumamente rico que no cabe el perder tiempo alguno tildando su ego ni adjetivándolo. Podemos dedicarnos a separar su discurso de su persona por más unido que se encuentre, y hablar sólo de la obra.
sesherbes 1 year ago
Tarkovsky is a poet, Instead of choosing each word carefuly, he looks for the perfect image. His films are perfect. He only made 7 feature films because he didn't work, he was creating a universe.
He's the best.
antoine3070 1 year ago 3
The time was a key element for Andrei...An Image cant get the time.
His sound´s structures shows what I say...
We cant get this kind of movies easily here, in Argentine =(
PezEspalda 1 year ago
Tarkovsky is one of the very few artists who merits the word "genius".
zenonmarko 1 year ago
I agree, you cannot pass on experiences. But you can give advice on, prepare for or provide backup after certain ones. It is not as if life is meaningless to future generations, isn't it? Reminds me of that parable of a young tree in "Stalker", today I think it is one-sided and wrong.
I disagree that you cannot force people to feel suggested emotions, you can see that each day in the mass media. Emotion is evoked for certain purposes, as emotion is stronger than reason.
Nyveg 1 year ago
@Nyveg I do not believe it is neccessary or even right to manipulate others. All one can say is this is the way I see it. Only megalomaniacs claim to be other's gods and therefore know what others should or how they should behave. Nobody needs to be spoonfed by, teachers, preachers and other such creatures.
RonAlmeida 1 year ago
the man loved to film water
GoodFriendsForever 1 year ago
2:46 - Wow, it was Tarkovsy who knew the meaning of life all along!
wunglow 1 year ago
Four more screenings of the award-winning documentary 'Meeting Andrei Tarkovsky' in LA: Monica 4-Plex, Santa Monica (Feb. 6,7 at 11AM) and Playhouse 7, Pasadena (Feb. 6,7 at 11AM). See you there!
trakovskyfilm 2 years ago
to that extent ('not taking in suggestet emotions'), I do belive this is the true nature of an artist, and it´s quite complicated to act and do things in those therms, life is complicated, but, I do belive he set an example, and maybe sacrificed himself, in the name of life. Just beutiful, not as a saint, but as a crazy guy with a lot of ideas and the energy to execute them. Celebrate Tarkovski, sometimes, he´s films makes us humans after all.
jkhgsdhgdhgjklsdhfgj 2 years ago 2
Film maker lowers him down to all other guys. He is dream maker!
christo7105 2 years ago 2
The only film maker. Andrei Tarkovsky.
Orphaniel1 2 years ago 60
He is not the only, respect to other film makers such as Bunuel, Bresson, Antonioni, Vigo, Ozu, Kurosawa, Pasolini, Dreyer, Lang, Bergman and more... They are the people who influenced Tarkovsky. Tarkovsky is a great cinematographer bot there are also other masters and styles...
kingofskateop 2 years ago 3
Oh, Please. A figure of speech, expressing my admiration for the guy. Cut the 'Masters of Film' polyanna bullshit, go to whatever academic valhalla you live in, stick a straw up your ass, suck on it and disappear.
Orphaniel1 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
internet1965 2 years ago
AhAhahah! So true!
pseudonym1964 2 years ago
Comment removed
internet1965 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
...........Tarkovsky gets right, we struggle BECAUSE we have no control over anything..so as we try to understand our plight, the ceiling is falling, Fire, Apples, Wind, Fog and etc.. all
internet1965 2 years ago 2
You are missing something "kingofskateop". Yes, there are other masters out there, certainly Kurosawa, Bergman, Ozu and etc... All other directors seem to subscribe to the old religion beliefs in which this world was created for us. Watch all the directors you have name and you will see a passive background. Nature is just there.
internet1965 2 years ago
I've watched nearly every director's movie that I can, and I'm still watching them again and again. Tarkovsky is a strong director who showed us the real power of cinema: "the pure language of cinema" that can affect "the unconscious/existence" of all human... But he couldn't reached that true language too, (he was so close with the "Mirror" and the "Stalker" but a real cinema should reach from children to the adults (like Bazin said). The editing should flow with the same speed of heart beats..
kingofskateop 2 years ago
pretentius college obscuratist prick that you are...
jkhgsdhgdhgjklsdhfgj 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Solaris VS 2001, I think Kubrick wins.
Kikirimiau007 2 years ago
I think you stupid
russkiirap 2 years ago
@Orphaniel1 Really? The only?
JRR951 1 year ago
@Orphaniel1
don't be so extreme
DogfromReservoir 11 months ago
Comment removed
DogfromReservoir 11 months ago
I am fascinated. To my knowledge, he is the only one that succeeded in focusing on the mechanism of life in its relationships between single human beings and different generations. He is a real philosopher. Accordingly, he was a great director. Lov u, maestro Tarkovskij...
iperuranioangela 2 years ago 2
where does this interview come from
RALPHREDtheBOHEMIAN 3 years ago
!!!!!!
nunhov 3 years ago
Tarkovsky's Sculpting in Time, best book ever. Should be standard reading in cinema and art classes. If you're at all interested in Tarkovsky, cinema or art in general it's a must read. Very simply and honestly written, but has much wisdom.
TourRoyale 3 years ago 3
Yes, I completely agree with you.
nadenka874 2 years ago 2
Thanks for the suggestion
Cocheese0 2 years ago
Fascinating stuff! Thanks for posting. I had never heard Tarkovsky in an interview before. These are the wonders of the era of YouTube, I guess!
AsaNisiMasa7 3 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
Just split up with my boyfriend......come check me out on Play-Cam * COM
blinkplayah 3 years ago
Muy bueno !! Gracias ; desde buenos aires,argentina.
bellinivernon 3 years ago
It is interesting to hear Tarkovski. I know his films and know that there are so much to think when watching them. I have, however, never seen a film where Tarkovski tells about his ideas.
He is definitely one of the men from the past I would like to discuss with.
hundqvist 3 years ago 4
I agree. It seems like it would be a very wholesome experience talking with him.
aftermiles 3 years ago 2
The greatest since the 7th Art beginnings. Firt he was boring me...until I came to understand...then, he fascinated me, since I've realised his movies were living memories... but from the future! Thanks for posting the Poet own words. As a prophet, he stands alone.
eon1968 3 years ago 5
The Single Best Director ever...
zedehamechiz 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Come to see my Tarkovsky's parody : "Sacrifions nous"
Venez voir ma parodie de Tarkovski.
Ames sensibles, prenez garde.
LordGoreX 3 years ago
I should like to say that Tarkovsky was most probably the best of directors; and yet I do prefer Pasolini as a film maker. I not sure why that is so. Much of Pasolini's stuff is indeed political and aesthetic pretension. Maybe Tarkovsky's films seem a little too constructed and precise (notwithstanding the fact that Pasolini hung over the shoulder of every cinematographer he ever met). I just don't understand myself.
sssswwwsssss 3 years ago 2
tarkovsky gerçekten tanıdığım en büyük yönetmenlerden biri.çoğu çalışmamda bana ilham verdi.özellikle şu filmi demek istemiyorum.çünkü bütün filmleri birbirinden muhteşemdir.sovyet sineması değil de mesela isveç ya da hollywood'da yönetmenlik yapıyor olsaydı bu kadar değerli bir noktada olmazdı.bu da sovyetlere bok atıp duranlara cevap olsun...
mordfall 4 years ago
Good!
fabrizionewyork 4 years ago
bravo, excellent post
anula2 4 years ago
Please check out the trailer to my short independent film-it's available on my channel. It's heavily influenced by Tarkovsky, although I do not claim to have achieved anywhere near his level of poignancy.
SashaInChina 4 years ago
he said some really meaningful things there...it's true that you can't learn from someone else's experience, you need to experience everything first hand.
his movies are on my to-watch list now.
Gwenwhyfarr 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This director dude, did not sound smart at all, I guess thats the fate of all Russians.. poor, poor souls, they are. Those Russians, I mean..
recain 4 years ago
dumbass, this artist is a genius
Maija84 4 years ago 5
Yeah, poor souls who don't sound smart - that's what we are, as well as our dead and living compatriots, like Dostoevsky, Chekhov, Tolstoy, Tarkovsky etc etc
daffodilicious 4 years ago 5
Pushkin, Gogol, etc.
faraz1729 4 years ago
such a pity he died so young, imagine what films he would have made ..
jimmynitcher 4 years ago 3
Thank you for posting. Tarkosvsky is a genius.
gombro 4 years ago
Great thanks for posting this video!
ONUR YAZGAN.
onuryazgan 4 years ago
Andréï Roublev One of my favorite film and Tarkovski, my favorite films director. Purée, qu'est ce que je l'aime cet homme de génie, si fascinant, il faut absolument lire le Temps Scellé !
ARoublev68 4 years ago
Great thanks for posting this video, youtube offers a great opportunity to communicate and share such videos, wich I'd harly see otherwise - not because of copyright, but the ignorance of they existence. Tarkovsky is one of the few who makes me feel proud that I'm russian.
Besides, if you interested in Tarkovsky's "Director's Lections Course" (in russian, sorry) -e-mail me.
anershov 4 years ago
Tarkovsky was closest to the notion of a genius in cinema. There were none before him, and unfortunately they won't be anymore... regretfully. Its my dream to see a film that approaches in importance and eloquence great novels of our and past centuries, but there are no such films. Tarkovsky was the only one to breach this barrier and was able to create body of work that paralleled in importance, eloquence, beauty, and mastery other bodies of work in such established art form as literature.
mastroiani001 5 years ago
Well, I dunno man. Kubrick ranks high if not higher in my opinion. Actually, I dont rank, forget that. Its not fair to rank art. But seriously, Kubrick is a genius.
F33bs 4 years ago
i've read that tarkovsky didn't think much of kubricks films - especially 2001 (often compared to solaris)... but i've never found any trace of what kubrick may have thought of tarkovsky's work... i reckon he would've loved it - and felt quite in awe of what tarkovsky was achieving... but he would not feel in any way inferior to him..
underbelly69 4 years ago
I first fell in love with film through Kubrick. However, I did not realize until I had seen all of Tarkovsky's films that while Kubrick is a technical master, Tarkovsky is one of the only true poets of film.
Boudosaved 4 years ago 3
I don't compare Tarkovsky with other filmmakers. Tarkovsky, to me, becomes an imagemaker, while the rest make movies.
faraz1729 4 years ago 32
Tarkovsky said he always regarded himself more of a poet than a filmmaker. But I think I understand you too.
thechordmaster 4 years ago 4
imagemaker or, even better, motion icons maker
saskiul 4 years ago 2
TARKOVSKY is the greatest filmmaker that ever lived. With only 7 films, he accomplished what many of today's directors don't even dream about. Stalker and Sacrifice are my favorite films.
I named my son Andrei after him. Tarkovski was put on this earth to make his 7 films and touch our souls.
chemijazz 5 years ago
It's very good to see this.
elgado 5 years ago
Many thanks for posting this! More please
therealkostenkoper 5 years ago
Very nice. Hope to see part 2 soon.
SinsOfArcadia 5 years ago