My folks bought an 1986 240gl when i was one week old, i have had it for the last 5 yrs. i just bought a 2011 navara but i just can't part with my old tank, in the 25yrs that the car has been in my family i has broken down once. it just wont die......i Still take it out once a week.
You are probably right, mij garagist is always saying just stay driving your 18 years old 940, dont buy newer volvo's, because they have more problems.
@gend501 Yeah, and they spoke the truth at the time. These old beaters don't quit and are the easiest & cheapest to keep on the road. Front wheel drive and multi-overhead cam engine design have turned the car industry from one that used to live the words of this ad, to one that just sadly, has killed itself. Unfortunately everybody just has to change to newer cars every few years,just to feel good about themselves. Volvo should bring back the real 4 cyl RWD cars. They always GO!
Saab was superb before GM took it over and ruined it. Volvo, in my opinion, was better before Ford took it over. At least a Volvo was a Volvo and not a Focus or Mondeo with a different shell and Volvo badge. I would have an old Volvo, but would fit a modern engine to get good economy. An old 244 or 345 sounds good to me.
They do last, I've owned my twice and it shows 218000 miles on the clock. It does not use water or oil. They were made from 1974 to 1993, the model was made for so long because there was still demand for the 240 even when they introduced the 740 to replace it.
aww that sucks , i moved from ireland to canada and my wife had a huge dodge dakota she was always complaining about gas milage so i suggested she look at a volvo 240 .....we bought it on the spot and have never looked back
what do you mean? old cars pollute more than 3 times then modern cars? but volvo cars pollute less then others, but a volvo from back then is polluting way more than daily cars.
Thats strange, as the owner of 4 245's, when ever they have the emission test they always pass. New cars in for the test always need repairs or adjustements. Tester always informs me they are cleaner then new cars. It's about servicing, and how well it is carried out. New cars are not run in as older cars were. It is just another tale to sell cars.
yes but you are wrong. it´s a -77 year model then it not have a catalysator, or what you will call it, that cleans out all gases/emissions that is even worse than co2. i don´t know what the name of the gas is in english.. but noway the car is cleaner.. you know back then, global warming was not an issue the same way it is today. sure, scientist had noticed it but not many cared. so the cars did´nt build to be "clean" except for volvos.
1977? Well thats handy, as my DL is a 1977. With cleaner emissions than newer cars. As I said before, if the car is maintained well, using quality parts, it will be more cleaner than a newer car. I am not wrong. It is called a Catalyser, with a Lambda Sond unit. This was used on Volvo's in the U.S., and other none E.U. countries, or though I gather Germany requested this as well.
most old cars actually pollute a lot. i read somewhere that the majority of air pollution from cars is from cars older than 1985 or something, and that's in my province where hardly anybody drives cars older than that
well if you think about it, the higher the mileage on a car, the more likely it is to have bad rings, carbon buildup, faulty cat converter etc.
but i agree with you that many old cars are very clean, my '91 mustang passes our local emissions tests really well and my '91 civic did until the cat. con. failed
i agree with you for the most part, but nobody i know replaces worn engine internals as part of "servicing", and cat converters cost like a grand so it is likely that a lot of older cars pollute badly
not saying it's based just on age, more on # of kilometers etc.
but also emissions controls have been changed a lot in the last couple of decades, and high outputs of CO (not CO2) and NOX can be reduced by computer adjustments
If you own a Volvo, you will be aware that Volvo state that good servicing is an investment to prolonging the life span of engine internals. This is why, I have 245's with high miles and clean emissions.
When they are tested, the tester always informs me the engines are cleaner than new cars with less miles on.
The fact is, a new car push is being forced upon people, to stimulate economies. And since when did a cat cost a grand? A genuine is only £200
you're right, a volvo one is cheaper, i just found that out
i guess it's more how stressful the miles were on the car than the # of them.
usually when i see them with bad emissions it's the ones with high mileage but i guess i'm used to seeing ones that have been revved high and poorly maintained and attributed too much of it to mileage rather than to taking a beating during the miles it drove
Yes Japanese cars are very expensive for parts in the UK. And do not last to well either. I heard from someone that lived in Japan briefly, every 4 years cars are stripped and either rebuilt or scrapped.
A car is an investement, my view, and will depreciate heavily, and loose it's quality if abused and not kept well.
i've also heard that cars are reconditioned often in japan, but my friend who's japanese said part of that is that they have really strict safety inspections every couple years
personally my friends/family and i have all had way better luck with japanese cars than with other ones, except for minor body rust on older models if they're kept outsde and exposed to the road salt
16.2 years? that doesn't seem that long, but I'm sure it is as an average. Got a 740 GL that is nothing but trouble at the moment, BUT it has been left standing for years and there's no rust apart from round the sunroof and the misfiring just needs to be sorted out
It's average. Cars gets scrapped after accidents aswell etc. So it's not only 'natural causes'. As a comparison the Swedish postal service uses Renaults which they scrap after 2 years of service and numerous transmission replacements. In the 'good old days' they had Volvos which were well over 10 years old still running. Ford have washed away the 'workhorse' image of Volvo and thus don't sell to fleets etc. anymore.
I own a rusty '75 estate, got it for 500 dollars, says 271,710 miles on the clock, but the last time the odometer worked was 1999. It still putters along. Putt putt putt.
All cars could be made to last like that. And nowdays they could make cars that last for 100 years, literally.
But then 90% of the car companies would go broke since people would buy way less cars. And then of course the price would skyrocket so you had do save for 20 years before you could buy one.
Some trivia. The ad was shot on the Great Salt Lake in Utah! They couldn't bury the vehicles in the salt so they cut off the front ends and used the driveshaft to prop them up.
Cool thing is is that they AINT lying. I have three volvos, 145 -73 745 -87 and 760 -90.
More or less problem less ownership (had the first one since 87), and the two newer ones you can hardly see or feel that theyve been used as much as they have. Quality at its best.
Dayum, this is a great commercial. Something is eerie about it, but it's very true! My '85 240 was an excellent car. "...built to last." They ain't kiddin'!
i like the 2x4's holding every other car up...
xcody38x 2 months ago
My folks bought an 1986 240gl when i was one week old, i have had it for the last 5 yrs. i just bought a 2011 navara but i just can't part with my old tank, in the 25yrs that the car has been in my family i has broken down once. it just wont die......i Still take it out once a week.
baconbits07bacon 5 months ago in playlist Volvo
You are probably right, mij garagist is always saying just stay driving your 18 years old 940, dont buy newer volvo's, because they have more problems.
gend501 8 months ago
Advertisement by fear. Probely worked in the cold war era.
gend501 1 year ago
@gend501 Yeah, and they spoke the truth at the time. These old beaters don't quit and are the easiest & cheapest to keep on the road. Front wheel drive and multi-overhead cam engine design have turned the car industry from one that used to live the words of this ad, to one that just sadly, has killed itself. Unfortunately everybody just has to change to newer cars every few years,just to feel good about themselves. Volvo should bring back the real 4 cyl RWD cars. They always GO!
perltech 8 months ago
nice old commercial...Volvo Rules.....from puerto rico
unirex86 1 year ago
Saab was superb before GM took it over and ruined it. Volvo, in my opinion, was better before Ford took it over. At least a Volvo was a Volvo and not a Focus or Mondeo with a different shell and Volvo badge. I would have an old Volvo, but would fit a modern engine to get good economy. An old 244 or 345 sounds good to me.
1100HondaCB 1 year ago
They do last, I've owned my twice and it shows 218000 miles on the clock. It does not use water or oil. They were made from 1974 to 1993, the model was made for so long because there was still demand for the 240 even when they introduced the 740 to replace it.
brettandcol 1 year ago
That car ,That colour . love them..............
SuperGogo34 1 year ago
volvo is the best safty car
MichaelBethlehem 1 year ago
If only Volvos were still Volvos nowadays and not just Mondeos with a Volvo badge.
perkele0079 2 years ago 17
aww that sucks , i moved from ireland to canada and my wife had a huge dodge dakota she was always complaining about gas milage so i suggested she look at a volvo 240 .....we bought it on the spot and have never looked back
BREN70S 2 years ago 3
My 92 240 is invincible. Some times wish i had a wagon, but the sedan is kinda sporty =p
dougie88is 2 years ago
why not have both ? there are still plenty out there , we bought a 240 wagon last year and we love it , hope you have many years in yours too :)
BREN70S 2 years ago 2
If only car registration wasnt so much where i live!
dougie88is 2 years ago
I drive a 1996 Volvo 850 GLT. My parent brought it in.....1996!! We still have it and I will say it will still run like forever. VOLVOS NEVER DIE!!!!
Xcensis 2 years ago
Have a 1977 245 DL , still going strong, engine is the cleanest on emissions. Old cars do not pollute, specially if it is a Volvo.
smogglez 2 years ago
what do you mean? old cars pollute more than 3 times then modern cars? but volvo cars pollute less then others, but a volvo from back then is polluting way more than daily cars.
WeAllGonnaDieAlive 2 years ago
Thats strange, as the owner of 4 245's, when ever they have the emission test they always pass. New cars in for the test always need repairs or adjustements. Tester always informs me they are cleaner then new cars. It's about servicing, and how well it is carried out. New cars are not run in as older cars were. It is just another tale to sell cars.
smogglez 2 years ago
yes but you are wrong. it´s a -77 year model then it not have a catalysator, or what you will call it, that cleans out all gases/emissions that is even worse than co2. i don´t know what the name of the gas is in english.. but noway the car is cleaner.. you know back then, global warming was not an issue the same way it is today. sure, scientist had noticed it but not many cared. so the cars did´nt build to be "clean" except for volvos.
WeAllGonnaDieAlive 2 years ago
but volvo has for a very long time maked clean cars so they has been better since 1977..
WeAllGonnaDieAlive 2 years ago
1977? Well thats handy, as my DL is a 1977. With cleaner emissions than newer cars. As I said before, if the car is maintained well, using quality parts, it will be more cleaner than a newer car. I am not wrong. It is called a Catalyser, with a Lambda Sond unit. This was used on Volvo's in the U.S., and other none E.U. countries, or though I gather Germany requested this as well.
smogglez 2 years ago
most old cars actually pollute a lot. i read somewhere that the majority of air pollution from cars is from cars older than 1985 or something, and that's in my province where hardly anybody drives cars older than that
trucksoner 2 years ago
It has nothing to do with the age, it is all about how well it is kept.
smogglez 2 years ago
well if you think about it, the higher the mileage on a car, the more likely it is to have bad rings, carbon buildup, faulty cat converter etc.
but i agree with you that many old cars are very clean, my '91 mustang passes our local emissions tests really well and my '91 civic did until the cat. con. failed
trucksoner 2 years ago
Ref my previous comment. Regular servicing = clean emissions.
smogglez 2 years ago
i agree with you for the most part, but nobody i know replaces worn engine internals as part of "servicing", and cat converters cost like a grand so it is likely that a lot of older cars pollute badly
not saying it's based just on age, more on # of kilometers etc.
but also emissions controls have been changed a lot in the last couple of decades, and high outputs of CO (not CO2) and NOX can be reduced by computer adjustments
trucksoner 2 years ago
If you own a Volvo, you will be aware that Volvo state that good servicing is an investment to prolonging the life span of engine internals. This is why, I have 245's with high miles and clean emissions.
When they are tested, the tester always informs me the engines are cleaner than new cars with less miles on.
The fact is, a new car push is being forced upon people, to stimulate economies. And since when did a cat cost a grand? A genuine is only £200
smogglez 2 years ago
i'm thinking of a honda cat, here in canada
it's about $900
you're right, a volvo one is cheaper, i just found that out
i guess it's more how stressful the miles were on the car than the # of them.
usually when i see them with bad emissions it's the ones with high mileage but i guess i'm used to seeing ones that have been revved high and poorly maintained and attributed too much of it to mileage rather than to taking a beating during the miles it drove
trucksoner 2 years ago
Yes Japanese cars are very expensive for parts in the UK. And do not last to well either. I heard from someone that lived in Japan briefly, every 4 years cars are stripped and either rebuilt or scrapped.
A car is an investement, my view, and will depreciate heavily, and loose it's quality if abused and not kept well.
smogglez 2 years ago
i've also heard that cars are reconditioned often in japan, but my friend who's japanese said part of that is that they have really strict safety inspections every couple years
personally my friends/family and i have all had way better luck with japanese cars than with other ones, except for minor body rust on older models if they're kept outsde and exposed to the road salt
trucksoner 2 years ago
music sounds like it's from The Never Ending Story
mrhosehose 2 years ago
16.2 years? that doesn't seem that long, but I'm sure it is as an average. Got a 740 GL that is nothing but trouble at the moment, BUT it has been left standing for years and there's no rust apart from round the sunroof and the misfiring just needs to be sorted out
mrhosehose 2 years ago
It's average. Cars gets scrapped after accidents aswell etc. So it's not only 'natural causes'. As a comparison the Swedish postal service uses Renaults which they scrap after 2 years of service and numerous transmission replacements. In the 'good old days' they had Volvos which were well over 10 years old still running. Ford have washed away the 'workhorse' image of Volvo and thus don't sell to fleets etc. anymore.
haardkaar 2 years ago
scary commercial !
bilalahmed2123 3 years ago 3
the only car you can trust
karimxwoods 3 years ago 14
I own a rusty '75 estate, got it for 500 dollars, says 271,710 miles on the clock, but the last time the odometer worked was 1999. It still putters along. Putt putt putt.
Sofar2 3 years ago
OMG, I had an '81 240 DL and it would go like 85 on the freeway. Too bad I totalled it :( Best car to crash in though, LOL
isainathan 3 years ago
i drive my 21 year old 1987 240 dl, and it still runs great.
t2m253 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Volvo. An investment in swedish boredom.
raVen670 3 years ago
i'm driving my 1990 740 turbo still.. 18 years later.. looks brand new still..
jonnyboyca 3 years ago 3
I like this AD with all the other crapy cars sticking in the snow. ----Volvo For Life----
revolution1one 3 years ago 5
Last I read the life expectancy of a 240 was 19.5 years.
I still see plenty 30 years on.
AaronJohnson1 4 years ago 2
All cars could be made to last like that. And nowdays they could make cars that last for 100 years, literally.
But then 90% of the car companies would go broke since people would buy way less cars. And then of course the price would skyrocket so you had do save for 20 years before you could buy one.
Scurck 4 years ago 3
Viva Volvo indeed!
jonboycity1967 4 years ago
Volvo for life! they certainly ain't kidding!
jonboycity1967 4 years ago
my S40 is the best car i have ever owned! Built to last!
jonboycity1967 4 years ago
S40 doesnt make mileages 600 000 km like series 200
dragonvlv 4 years ago 4
My 244 dl is from 1975. It's DOUBLED it's average life. DAMN good car. You can't argue with its longevity
derrro 4 years ago 5
PaulJonnes?
sjokoland1 4 years ago
this are a real car´s i had 3 of them 2 diesel and 2 petrol they are the best
m77arcopf 4 years ago
2+2=3?
steemtv 4 years ago
You make a good point but your math isn`t any better than my shoes.
revolution1one 3 years ago
utah looks like the worlds biggest crap hole
AusseSurf3r 4 years ago
Some trivia. The ad was shot on the Great Salt Lake in Utah! They couldn't bury the vehicles in the salt so they cut off the front ends and used the driveshaft to prop them up.
smurftums 4 years ago
Man, this is one's awsome! Drive a 90' 740 my self. But the 240 is a better car...
psykotanks 4 years ago 2
what a classic...
josatinho 4 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
20 year old hotties ready to date adults like you at WEBFLINGTODAY dot COM
brandyhotgirlo 4 years ago
viva volvos
praskovia13 4 years ago
Cool thing is is that they AINT lying. I have three volvos, 145 -73 745 -87 and 760 -90.
More or less problem less ownership (had the first one since 87), and the two newer ones you can hardly see or feel that theyve been used as much as they have. Quality at its best.
volvo145 4 years ago
Dayum, this is a great commercial. Something is eerie about it, but it's very true! My '85 240 was an excellent car. "...built to last." They ain't kiddin'!
palebeachbum 4 years ago
Nuts man, pretty sweet commercial.
kidd2k1 4 years ago
16.2 years...a tad longer than that i think. more like....FOREVER. volvo for life!
majorgeneralmckay 4 years ago 2
good ad! really true too- my 240 still looks and drives great.
IggyM 4 years ago
thanks for posting!
malamolo 4 years ago
Still using a volvo 340!!!!
anthony100uk 4 years ago
lol so true
pitbullo 5 years ago