of course GT graphics are so much better and so photo realistic, but looks at the speed sense! in GT you just can't feel how far is the corner and just brake in time just because you remember, but not feel!
but i still think between ACR and GT5 graphics is meanful similarity! even i feel Eutechnyx always trying to make it's games feel much japanese-like
As far as I have seen console game dev teams push the envelope not PC devs (this may change). Naughty Dog is usually at the front of the pack. Sure ragdolls were introduced to consoles in Jak 2 (possibly deved on PC) but, Texture Streaming was made on PS1 by Naughty Dog for Crash Bandicoot, new (sometimes better/worse) controllers were made for consoles & PC adopted them. Devs have to really optimize to make games like U3 & if they can do that on a console just imagine what they can do on PC! Hm
I quite frankly am glad to see PC games like "The Witcher 2" (2011) and "ACR" (1st I've heard of this idk) this means that developers are finally using PC's potential more. To Me it seems dev teams are mostly behind the curve look at PS3's "U3: Drake's Deception" (2011) vs "The Witcher 2". Course The Witcher 2 looks better but, Uncarted 3 comes very close in terms of graphics considering PS3's specs. If a 6 yr old console's games graphics can rival a NEW PC game's grafex somethings wrong! Right?
About sentence 3: "To Me it seems dev teams are mostly behind the curve look at PS3's 'U3: Drake's Deception' (2011) vs 'The Witcher 2'." I did mean PC devs seem to be behind the curve. To Me it seems [that PC] dev teams are mostly behind the curve look at PS3's "U3: Drake's Deception" (2011) vs "The Witcher 2".
Actually PC has been better in the GPU department for quite some time now but, the high end PC gaming rigs are now finally up to speed in the CPU department. Belive it or not some high end smartphones (like the NEW Droid RAZR by Motorola) have more RAM than BOTH the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 Combined.
PS Vita has as much RAM as PS3 and 10MB less than X360. Those are the indisputable facts! Technology moves forward, all the time.
Can't we all just agree that ACR (PC) Looks better than GT5 (PS3) & that GT5 looks better than FM4 (X360)? Can we agree that PC (On the high end 4 CPU cores at 3GHz 8GB RAM with a 2.4Ghz GPU & 2GB VRAM) is more powerful than PS3 (6 usable CPU cores at 3.2Ghz 256MB RAM with a 550Mhz GPU & 256MB VRAM) & PS3 is more powerful than X360 (3 CPU cores at 3.2GHz 512MB total shared RAM/VRAM & a 500Mhz GPU with 10MB EDRAM). So... FM4<GT5<ACR & X360<PS3<High end 2012 PCs! Do the math! PC is better.
@MrUppmas Your post: "ACR doesn't have limits on it's graphics, because it's a PC game"
It HAS limits because. A PC has limits. Whithout upgraded hardware its stuck on graphics we have now. And then fanboy says (you): But if we didn't had consoles the graphics would be better. False! I'f we didn't had console we didn't had Pong, Mario, Pac-man ETC. So the progress of graphics wouldn't be this far. Besides if a game hasn't limits it would be to expensive to play because of the price.
@dooder39 Eh... How should I put this... If you think I am a PC-elitist, you're wrong. The only gaming platform I own is a PS3. With that post I just mean, that you cant compare PC games and console games, because PC in theory has no limits. Of course PC DOES have it's limits, but the limit is way above the console limit. PC game developers don't have to look at the platform limits, that's why PC games have better textures and such.
@MrUppmas Good for you, I have a PS3 too. Anyway, if a game has to high-end graphics it wouldn't sale because:
- Many people have to low specs.
- It would cost to much to buy and let it run on a PC.
Besides, the reason why PC games looks better then console is because the PC is ALWAYS the lead platform. If a developer says we use a PS3 as lead platform, they actualy mean the lead platform of consoles. You seriously don't think the PS3 reached his limits do you?
@You know that you don't have to have high end PC to play gorgeous looking games? Like BF3, you need a super computer to have the maximum potential, but you can play it with an average PC player's PC. And no, PS3 hasn't reached it's limits, because people don't bother to try.
@MrUppmas I don't know about how strong your PC needs to be to play BF3, only thing i know is my PC can't... And you'r right about that people don't bother try to reach the max of a PS3. And thats why people shouldn't say PC is better, because we didn't saw what a PS3 really can.
@DrHouth A blind squirrel would no that that is incorrect. a sim on ps3, 360, or pc can be more realistic than another. You typed that paragraph to fail at logic
@LilProveInn No, I am a guy who hates all of this hate-shit on the internet. GT5 is badbecause blablabla... Forza 4 is better because blablabla... GT5 sucks because blablabla... Forza 4 is good because blablabla... And vice versa. Unnecessary hate is unnecessary and stupid.
@MrUppmas I am just stating the facts, because there is a lot of blind GT fanboys who hates Forza. There is more hate on Forza then GT, much more. And when they come with retarded "facts" that does not exist, then I say what is right.
Like it is a fact that Forza 4 has more realistic physics than GT5 and that GT5 way more popular than Forza.
@xdlugia1 I don't take part of this stupid fanboy war, so I don't have to prove/disprove anything. Just prove your own fact to me, and you will have my respect, I assure.
@xdlugia1 lol nope Forza is a very arcadish game in comparison to pc sims. Gt5 is the only console game that can be calles a semi realistic sim on consoles.
Auto Club Revolution looks better, sounds better and is more realistic. No doubt about that.
ACR is a simulation game, GT5 an arcade. You can't compare them in termes of physics.
Road and curb textures are much sweeter in ACR. But if you're ever been in Spa you'll see the version of Spa in GT5 is far more realistic: run-off zones, basic curve shapes, environment, ...
I play ACR Beta myself, it will be a very cool game but I hope the circuits get some changes when it will be released.
better physics? are you serious??? I really wanted to play ACR, so when a i received a my beta key i was pretty excited, but once i played, i was pretty desapointed. Sudenly it was 1999 all over again, and i was playing NFS3 o 4. ACR is a good game, but doesnt come near to GT5, or even older PC games like GT Legends!
graphics are good for ACR, but physics are dissapointing. It can't compare with GT5. Also since its beta the online servers are pretty slow and lag is everywhere.
GT5 has a laser-cast track as iRacing (a PC game that has madelaser tracks). And it can be seen on individual sections of the track, not to mention his true appearance, which also falls in favor of GT5. The game for the PC has better texture and is the only plus in comparison to GT5 on PS3.
Just look at Kimi Raikkonen's real F1 lap on Spa watch?v=tT09p51cfSI , and now tell me which one is better. Surely, ACR has higher detailed textures and scenery, but when it comes to accuracy, GT5 version is the closest to real as it will ever get. ACR has incorrect kerbs positioning, missing track lines, too wide sections (look at the straight after Eau Rouge, how much wider it is in ACR than in real life), lightning and scenery looking good, but nowhere near the real track.
Make a 'reality' check and GT5 wins. ACR has very detailed textures and details but the closest to reality is the GT5 version. With C.A.R.S version of SPA (not finished) happens the same, it looks amazing but is not as accurate as GT5 version.
Of course those tracks are going to 'look better' with more quality textures but as accurate as in GT5 compared with the real ones no. On GT5 you are in a virtual real track.
I have tons of games with SPA and Nurburgring and GT5 has the best versions
@Elguaygus Open your eyes. I love Gran Turismo just as you do, but look at the apex, ground. The ground have more detail and apex have skid marks on them. This makes sense since this game is gonna be for PC.
gt5's spa looks like today's spa and acr's looks lie the historic spa so they both are good in their own aspects... gt5's trees arent the best, and im not sure if those skid-marks in acr are correct... why cant we all appreciate the good parts on games instead of always taking out their small mistakes? it's much more fun then.. and isnt that the point of these?
ACR much better, quality sound, graphics much better...
fmmsss 1 hour ago
Forza 4 needs this track!
takenxtx 3 days ago
Somebody tell me what SPA is?
geepgeep567 2 weeks ago in playlist Comparison Videos
@geepgeep567 SPA Francorchams, famous circuit in Belgium, Europe.
MotoGamesTV 2 weeks ago
of course GT graphics are so much better and so photo realistic, but looks at the speed sense! in GT you just can't feel how far is the corner and just brake in time just because you remember, but not feel!
but i still think between ACR and GT5 graphics is meanful similarity! even i feel Eutechnyx always trying to make it's games feel much japanese-like
Takihiki 3 weeks ago
As far as I have seen console game dev teams push the envelope not PC devs (this may change). Naughty Dog is usually at the front of the pack. Sure ragdolls were introduced to consoles in Jak 2 (possibly deved on PC) but, Texture Streaming was made on PS1 by Naughty Dog for Crash Bandicoot, new (sometimes better/worse) controllers were made for consoles & PC adopted them. Devs have to really optimize to make games like U3 & if they can do that on a console just imagine what they can do on PC! Hm
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
I quite frankly am glad to see PC games like "The Witcher 2" (2011) and "ACR" (1st I've heard of this idk) this means that developers are finally using PC's potential more. To Me it seems dev teams are mostly behind the curve look at PS3's "U3: Drake's Deception" (2011) vs "The Witcher 2". Course The Witcher 2 looks better but, Uncarted 3 comes very close in terms of graphics considering PS3's specs. If a 6 yr old console's games graphics can rival a NEW PC game's grafex somethings wrong! Right?
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
At Myself
pay attention
To all
About sentence 3: "To Me it seems dev teams are mostly behind the curve look at PS3's 'U3: Drake's Deception' (2011) vs 'The Witcher 2'." I did mean PC devs seem to be behind the curve. To Me it seems [that PC] dev teams are mostly behind the curve look at PS3's "U3: Drake's Deception" (2011) vs "The Witcher 2".
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
Actually PC has been better in the GPU department for quite some time now but, the high end PC gaming rigs are now finally up to speed in the CPU department. Belive it or not some high end smartphones (like the NEW Droid RAZR by Motorola) have more RAM than BOTH the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 Combined.
PS Vita has as much RAM as PS3 and 10MB less than X360. Those are the indisputable facts! Technology moves forward, all the time.
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
At All
Can't we all just agree that ACR (PC) Looks better than GT5 (PS3) & that GT5 looks better than FM4 (X360)? Can we agree that PC (On the high end 4 CPU cores at 3GHz 8GB RAM with a 2.4Ghz GPU & 2GB VRAM) is more powerful than PS3 (6 usable CPU cores at 3.2Ghz 256MB RAM with a 550Mhz GPU & 256MB VRAM) & PS3 is more powerful than X360 (3 CPU cores at 3.2GHz 512MB total shared RAM/VRAM & a 500Mhz GPU with 10MB EDRAM). So... FM4<GT5<ACR & X360<PS3<High end 2012 PCs! Do the math! PC is better.
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
Holy f!! F2P beaten B2P!
dooder39 3 weeks ago
@MrUppmas Lol, most stupid reason ever!
dooder39 3 weeks ago
@dooder39 Or the most intelligent? I guess so.
MrUppmas 3 weeks ago
@MrUppmas LOLOL... If u had any idea what you said, you would kill your self because of your failness.
dooder39 3 weeks ago
@dooder39 Well.. then, tell me, why should I kill myself?
MrUppmas 3 weeks ago
@MrUppmas Your post: "ACR doesn't have limits on it's graphics, because it's a PC game"
It HAS limits because. A PC has limits. Whithout upgraded hardware its stuck on graphics we have now. And then fanboy says (you): But if we didn't had consoles the graphics would be better. False! I'f we didn't had console we didn't had Pong, Mario, Pac-man ETC. So the progress of graphics wouldn't be this far. Besides if a game hasn't limits it would be to expensive to play because of the price.
dooder39 3 weeks ago
@dooder39 Eh... How should I put this... If you think I am a PC-elitist, you're wrong. The only gaming platform I own is a PS3. With that post I just mean, that you cant compare PC games and console games, because PC in theory has no limits. Of course PC DOES have it's limits, but the limit is way above the console limit. PC game developers don't have to look at the platform limits, that's why PC games have better textures and such.
MrUppmas 3 weeks ago
@MrUppmas Good for you, I have a PS3 too. Anyway, if a game has to high-end graphics it wouldn't sale because:
- Many people have to low specs.
- It would cost to much to buy and let it run on a PC.
Besides, the reason why PC games looks better then console is because the PC is ALWAYS the lead platform. If a developer says we use a PS3 as lead platform, they actualy mean the lead platform of consoles. You seriously don't think the PS3 reached his limits do you?
dooder39 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
@You know that you don't have to have high end PC to play gorgeous looking games? Like BF3, you need a super computer to have the maximum potential, but you can play it with an average PC player's PC. And no, PS3 hasn't reached it's limits, because people don't bother to try.
MrUppmas 3 weeks ago
@MrUppmas I don't know about how strong your PC needs to be to play BF3, only thing i know is my PC can't... And you'r right about that people don't bother try to reach the max of a PS3. And thats why people shouldn't say PC is better, because we didn't saw what a PS3 really can.
dooder39 3 weeks ago
@dooder39 Agreed 100%
MrUppmas 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
since when does gt5 look so awful? try it next time with HD output
even thought acr looks pretty good. i saw other videos were it looked totally trash and they said they had everything on high settings
VxO4fame 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
VxO4fame 3 weeks ago
thats gt5 prologue not gt5
Jmoney1933 1 month ago in playlist Comparison Videos
@Jmoney1933 Yeah, go find SPA in GT5: Prologue.
MotoGamesTV 1 month ago 5
that is deff not gt5 gameplay!!!!!!! fucking idiots i swear gt5 is better than the auto club !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jmoney1933 1 month ago in playlist Comparison Videos
@Jmoney1933 Then what is it if it's not GT5?
MotoGamesTV 1 month ago
Spa
experiencebg 1 month ago in playlist Comparison Videos
Hey, open your eyes. This is not GT5 gameplay footage, this is low bitrate video with much video artefacts.
UltraZelan 1 month ago
@UltraZelan
Its GT5. I don't know what ACR is though looks nice.
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago in playlist Comparison Videos
@VariantAEC
I know how GT5 looks real, coz i have it. GT5 in this video looks like shit, not like real GT5.
UltraZelan 3 weeks ago
PC FTW !! im glad that i have a powerful PC :P
GRtroops 1 month ago
@DrHouth A blind squirrel would no that that is incorrect. a sim on ps3, 360, or pc can be more realistic than another. You typed that paragraph to fail at logic
SoulDarksydeItachi 1 month ago
Do a Forza 4 vs ACR please!
twindrags1 1 month ago
Not really much to say. just shows PC gaming makes for better visuals.
StewMM 1 month ago 2
I still prefer the GT5. ACR graphic looks much better, but I don't the yellowish effect.
kasou01 1 month ago
mmm.... In some parts GT5 looks better and viceversa :/
VictoReX11 1 month ago
Is this game gonna add cockpit view?
paterah 1 month ago
Thanks for making the exhaust note the main noise you hear. GT5 is such a disappointment
BlackSabbath370 1 month ago
Comment removed
rhei2vanz 1 month ago
GT5 looks PS2dish.
LilProveInn 1 month ago
@LilProveInn It looks like you have never seen PS2 graphics.
ChinatownWieners 1 month ago
@LilProveInn Hey, are you that GT5 hater?
MrUppmas 1 month ago in playlist Lisää videoita käyttäjältä MotoGamesTV
@MrUppmas are you that GT5 fanboy, that you need to defend the damn game? If you are sure about how good GT5 is, then why even bother defending it?
LilProveInn 1 month ago
@LilProveInn No, I am a guy who hates all of this hate-shit on the internet. GT5 is badbecause blablabla... Forza 4 is better because blablabla... GT5 sucks because blablabla... Forza 4 is good because blablabla... And vice versa. Unnecessary hate is unnecessary and stupid.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
ACR doesn't have 2D trees like GT5.
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 ACR doesn't have limits on it's graphics, because it's a PC game.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@MrUppmas No shit Sherlock!
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 Yes shit GT5 hater!
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@MrUppmas WTF dude? Did I ever say that I hated GT5? No, I did not.
But I Guess that makes you an ignorant GT fanboy, and those are really stupid, so GTFO!
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 I have seen you hating on GT5 on another vids. I never forget your name.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@MrUppmas Oh really? I always state the facts. So if the facts are negative about GT5, it is not exactly hate.
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 Somehow you have been only pointing out the negative facts... I've never seen you say anything good about GT5, that's the problem.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@MrUppmas I am just stating the facts, because there is a lot of blind GT fanboys who hates Forza. There is more hate on Forza then GT, much more. And when they come with retarded "facts" that does not exist, then I say what is right.
Like it is a fact that Forza 4 has more realistic physics than GT5 and that GT5 way more popular than Forza.
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 ''The fact that Forza 4 has more leastic physics than GT5'' Hah. I hear that a lot, have you actually got somethinng to prove that.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@MrUppmas Or more important; can you disprove it?
PS: GT5's rollovers are everything but realistic.
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 Again... hate hate hate hate... fuck it.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@MrUppmas I'll take that as a "No".
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1 I don't take part of this stupid fanboy war, so I don't have to prove/disprove anything. Just prove your own fact to me, and you will have my respect, I assure.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
@xdlugia1
Yea & FM4 rollovers make Me ROFL too!
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
@VariantAEC Yeah, me too! They make GT5 look like shit!
xdlugia1 3 weeks ago
@MrUppmas
He may not but I do stay tuned!
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
@VariantAEC What are you referring to?
MrUppmas 3 weeks ago
@xdlugia1 lol nope Forza is a very arcadish game in comparison to pc sims. Gt5 is the only console game that can be calles a semi realistic sim on consoles.
normalguyhere 1 month ago
@normalguyhere lol at the noobs who don't do their research.
xdlugia1 1 month ago
@xdlugia1
"Two Epic Fails in under 30 seconds Forza 4 Edition" Stay Tuned!
VariantAEC 3 weeks ago
ACR looks better, of course, but I went to the last Spa race, and the GT5 version is a lot more accurate...
bduddy55555 1 month ago
Auto Club Revolution looks better, sounds better and is more realistic. No doubt about that.
ACR is a simulation game, GT5 an arcade. You can't compare them in termes of physics.
Road and curb textures are much sweeter in ACR. But if you're ever been in Spa you'll see the version of Spa in GT5 is far more realistic: run-off zones, basic curve shapes, environment, ...
I play ACR Beta myself, it will be a very cool game but I hope the circuits get some changes when it will be released.
senne99 1 month ago
@senne99 did you just said GT5 is an arcade? what world do you live in?
mtm1988 1 month ago
@mtm1988 Yep,, there are not many simulation games. Well.. ACR is actually a "semi-simulation"
senne99 1 month ago
@senne99 Actually GT5 is more realistic somehow.
MrUppmas 1 month ago
better physics? are you serious??? I really wanted to play ACR, so when a i received a my beta key i was pretty excited, but once i played, i was pretty desapointed. Sudenly it was 1999 all over again, and i was playing NFS3 o 4. ACR is a good game, but doesnt come near to GT5, or even older PC games like GT Legends!
pulloa430 1 month ago 2
graphics are good for ACR, but physics are dissapointing. It can't compare with GT5. Also since its beta the online servers are pretty slow and lag is everywhere.
MistaSuh 1 month ago 2
Gran Turismo 5: $50 (at launch)
Auto Club Revolution: free
So you can get in and race Spa, just like that video, for $0.00... that's pretty cool
checkme331 1 month ago 8
muhahaha wtf is gt5!!?!?!?!? ^^
nullskill 1 month ago
GT5 has a laser-cast track as iRacing (a PC game that has madelaser tracks). And it can be seen on individual sections of the track, not to mention his true appearance, which also falls in favor of GT5. The game for the PC has better texture and is the only plus in comparison to GT5 on PS3.
TheDawidM 1 month ago 4
Auto Club Revolution"
-better textures
-better physics
-better sounds
Gran Turismo 5
-better cars but only premium
-better lighting
TheEryk03 1 month ago 2
Do you have the HDMI for your PS3 setup, because mine looks a lot cleaner and crisper.
TKO52286 1 month ago
@TKO52286
Not much of a comparison otherwise, since the CPU processing power is likely way more than the PS3
TKO52286 1 month ago
Just look at Kimi Raikkonen's real F1 lap on Spa watch?v=tT09p51cfSI , and now tell me which one is better. Surely, ACR has higher detailed textures and scenery, but when it comes to accuracy, GT5 version is the closest to real as it will ever get. ACR has incorrect kerbs positioning, missing track lines, too wide sections (look at the straight after Eau Rouge, how much wider it is in ACR than in real life), lightning and scenery looking good, but nowhere near the real track.
pendeho47 1 month ago 2
GT5 wins. But the road is not shiny so lol.
n00bm0de 1 month ago in playlist More videos from MotoGamesTV
autoclub looks realistic to!
plunderraar1 1 month ago
Which ever one is on pc is the one that wins
tank2g2 1 month ago
GT5 WIN!
sr2150 1 month ago
@supra1722 I agree about the trees in gt5 it's as if they're made of two cardboards but they're both very good
marioandgt5 1 month ago
GT5 miazdzy wykonaniem SPA
PeterMacPL 1 month ago
I wonder what.car he was using...
Domthebomb717 1 month ago
Track looks better then GT5 and GT5's scenery is better, but who looks at the scenery when driving. (unless your crashing).
wtccrules1 1 month ago
How are the physics of ACR in comparison to GT5?
PDAFreak14 1 month ago
Make a 'reality' check and GT5 wins. ACR has very detailed textures and details but the closest to reality is the GT5 version. With C.A.R.S version of SPA (not finished) happens the same, it looks amazing but is not as accurate as GT5 version.
Of course those tracks are going to 'look better' with more quality textures but as accurate as in GT5 compared with the real ones no. On GT5 you are in a virtual real track.
I have tons of games with SPA and Nurburgring and GT5 has the best versions
Foxiol 1 month ago 2
wow, nieźle to wygląda (ACR)
11adi 1 month ago
Gt5 have more realistic graphics.
Elguaygus 1 month ago
@Elguaygus Open your eyes. I love Gran Turismo just as you do, but look at the apex, ground. The ground have more detail and apex have skid marks on them. This makes sense since this game is gonna be for PC.
lourke123 1 month ago 13
@lourke123 Yes, GT5 has worse graphics but are more realistic.
Elguaygus 1 month ago
@lourke123 Gran Turismo 5 has way more jaggies..
This + Project cars = <3 PC!
BeastlyRig 1 month ago
@lourke123 The video doesn't give either game justice, terrible recording/transcoding quality for both of them.
GunnyW14 1 month ago
they both look nice and realistic to me o_O
FanatecSystem 1 month ago 2
gt5's spa looks like today's spa and acr's looks lie the historic spa so they both are good in their own aspects... gt5's trees arent the best, and im not sure if those skid-marks in acr are correct... why cant we all appreciate the good parts on games instead of always taking out their small mistakes? it's much more fun then.. and isnt that the point of these?
supra1722 1 month ago
gt5 has the worst sound ever.
madchris555 1 month ago
is auto club gonna be a pc exclusive or every platform?
lourke123 1 month ago
@lourke123 pc exclusive i think
TactfulValkyrie 1 month ago
Auto Club Revolution looks MILES better than that other game
SApcGUY 1 month ago
@SApcGUY It looks MILES Older than GT5.
o0CASHBOY0o 1 month ago
acr sounds better and also looks better
SAFFY7411 1 month ago
*video not loading*
*press refresh as video loads*
God dangit.
MagicalChickenWings 1 month ago 23