@sw1000xg catch up to what? the people buying in to physx are the ones being locked out... no physx cards work any more even tho' they're more than capable of this stuff and you can't mix ATI+nV just because nV said so. Physx is nV's walled garden. nV needs to catch up with everyone else... and release some hardware that doesn't self destruct with heat cycles (google: nvidia oven) and has more than 5% yield (google: nvidia fermi yield). Closed standards and proprietary languages always lose.
@moozaad Well how about Asus simulating Creative oh what so ATI can't do the same with physx? That's because they can't NV uses Physx and Cuda Ati is just a graphics card thats it!!! it can't do anything else...
suky gfx
QOQO19 1 year ago
looks nice, shame it was done in physx instead of an industry wide standard like Bullet
moozaad 1 year ago
@moozaad Then ATI needs to catch up!!!!
sw1000xg 1 year ago
@sw1000xg catch up to what? the people buying in to physx are the ones being locked out... no physx cards work any more even tho' they're more than capable of this stuff and you can't mix ATI+nV just because nV said so. Physx is nV's walled garden. nV needs to catch up with everyone else... and release some hardware that doesn't self destruct with heat cycles (google: nvidia oven) and has more than 5% yield (google: nvidia fermi yield). Closed standards and proprietary languages always lose.
moozaad 1 year ago
@moozaad Well how about Asus simulating Creative oh what so ATI can't do the same with physx? That's because they can't NV uses Physx and Cuda Ati is just a graphics card thats it!!! it can't do anything else...
sw1000xg 1 year ago