here the thing if its anty gravity why does it have thrust if its antygravity it will work in a vacume also it might be gravity sheilding but i really dought it
I believe in an aether but this guy doesn't know what he is talking about. This is not anti-gravity, it is simply are moving cause life. This device doesn't work in a vacuum, if it was anti-gravity, it would work in a vacuum.
how do you explain the operation of the lifter in high vacuum. Aether was never disproven. The results of michelson moreley were not what they expected not a null result. See relativity challenge.
#1, There is no "aether". Science has proven it not to exist! This was an outmoded idea that was used to explain how light traveled through space, as it was thought light was a wave. Sounds do not travel in the vacuum of space because there is no medium to transfer the energy through.
@UnderManiac This guy doesn't know what he is talking about, it is simply air flow causing lift. However, I do believe in aether and I know all about the Michelson-Morley Experiment which made a wrong assumption about the characteristics of the aether. Atomic matter only corresponds to 5% of all the energy in the Universe, that is dark matter and dark energy make up the rest which might turn out to be an aether. You will find the aether makes a comeback very soon.
True Free energy devices exist,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Be the revolution!
The question of vacuum function was settled 55-years ago, by the inventor of theis technology, in Paris, King of Prussia, PA, Winston Salem, North Carolina, and More recently in the USA and Japan.
The charges in the lifter are both electric and magnetic because they are charged moving air molecules. The effective electrode size of the wire is really a 30mm radius tube of positively charged ions moving at the speed of sound. Aether will not flow in only a pure electric field. There must be both a magnetic and electric field between the charges for aether to flow.
Aether will flow in a magnetic charge field between a positive and negative magnetic charge. Thats called a magnetic dipole.
According to this man's explaination of how the device works if you turned the device side ways instead of going to the side it should still go up. I have personally tried this allready... It whent side ways and not up... So sir... try again.
@pmoneil Well according to the documents I procured directly from NASA which details thier own experiments on the devices they have concluded that it is just a simple ion wind effect and nothing more. Sorry but there is no antigravity here. And yes I would be more than happy to send you a copy of the documents if you like.
@pmoneil OMFG this is such a simple technology, The thin wire is charged with very high voltage, very low current and so ionises the air around the wire. These Ionised air particles are immediately attracted to the foil strip dragging neutral air particles with it and so producing thrust. The assembly (usually made of balsa wood frame or other light material) is sufficiently light for it to lift off. It will thrust in whatever direction u point it. there is no "anti-gravity" effect whatsoever...
@pmoneil Clearly no one has told you about the paper NASA put out in 2004. They did extensive testing with lifters and other asymetrical capacitors and found absolutely no evidence of an antigravitic effect being present at all. Their tests where quite thoroughly explained in the paper. Such detail was used that even a 10 year old could recreate some of the experiments. At least the ones not involving multi-million dollar equipment.
I agree there is an airflow caused by the high voltage, not an antigravity effect. I built a lifter and photographed it running in a Schlieren setup and you can see the airflow around the high voltage wire moving down toward the foil electrode. The video is on my blog if you are interested. It's clear that there is quite a bit of turbulent airflow. Does that account for all the lift? I'm not sure but I bet its most (all) of it. - Otto
Not to bash your lectures or anything but, I think alot of Browns work has been misunderstood... Alot has changed in the past 70 years and we understand things about subatomic particles that we didnt before. Ether is a term I think that is often used in the wrong context as well. Anyways great lecture, sound is kinda low XD
From ThomasTownsend Brown's paper "How I Control Gravitation", SCIENCE AND INVENTION, August, 1929: F = Vm1m2/r2
Where F is the electrokinetic force in newtons or dynes, V is Voltage, m1 is the primary electrode, the cathode- the Saucer (negatively charged), m2 is the anode (positively charged) that is the forward electrode, or upper electrode in the VTOL vertical lifting version, r is the radius or area of the device to be flown horizontally or degravitated.
If you guys see a TheBeamshipCaptain commenting on these videos, it's not really Beamshipcaptain, it's an imposter. He's trying to ruin Beamshipcaptains good name.
IMHO , the charge causes ionization of the air around the wire. The air moves around the wires , and pushes against the air below it .
It still depends on the movement of air. It will not work in a vacumn .
There is no change in gravity or mass decrease on the device. It's a cool device all the same. I don't believe there is such a thing as anti gravity though, but I hope I am proved wrong some day.
It does work in a vacuum, as tested for many decades, and works more efficiently in vacuum. Read the physics journals. Successful vauum tests 2 miles from me, exactly 50-years ago, 1959, at GE Space Center, King of Prussia, PA, right accrosss from the mall. Also at Societe construction Aeronautique du sud Oest, in Paris, France, 1955, successful tests of disc-airfils at less than a billionth of an Atmosphere. This is warp drive!
yes it does work in vacuum but will not work well in certain low vacuum ranges like 5 to 50 mm Hg. conductivity of gas increases with decreasing pressure to a minimum at 5mm. then below 5mm conductivity begins to drop again. so attempting to test lifter in low vacuum between 5 and 20 mm would cause the electrode to short out with the plate in this range. that is why some demostrations of evacuated lifter tests claim the lifter to be non functional in vacuum.
@Beamshipcaptain Watch the video from MythBusters. Do a simple YouTube search on "lifter anti gravity". Look for video " Lifter Anti-Gravity Myth has been BUSTED 1 of 2".
@krussellm Mythbusters are both actor KIDS, and corporate shills. THey could'nt get the Bedini free-energy motor to work either. Yet, a SCHOOLGIRL got one working, and its on YouTube. THe question of vacuum function was settle 50-years ago, and by one of my clients, John Fiala, who did vacuum chamber tests, and onboard power with a custom proproetary power-unit.
The nature of gravity and inertia is a separate lecture. But briefly, gravity can be viewed as a flow of aether in a downward diection. As it passes through mass it cause a drag effect. The lifter directs this flow around the mass which can be described as shielding similar to the way an umbrella shields one from the rain.
Exactly right. Gravitation is a PUSH, due to a converging-flux of Ether. The Casimir-effect on a huge scale! But there is a micro-gravity-filed within the device that causes the Cathode-plate to do the lifting.
here the thing if its anty gravity why does it have thrust if its antygravity it will work in a vacume also it might be gravity sheilding but i really dought it
TheSaltysack 3 months ago
not antygravity
TheSaltysack 6 months ago
I believe in an aether but this guy doesn't know what he is talking about. This is not anti-gravity, it is simply are moving cause life. This device doesn't work in a vacuum, if it was anti-gravity, it would work in a vacuum.
nikolayzou 1 year ago
how do you explain the operation of the lifter in high vacuum. Aether was never disproven. The results of michelson moreley were not what they expected not a null result. See relativity challenge.
pmoneil123 1 year ago
#1, There is no "aether". Science has proven it not to exist! This was an outmoded idea that was used to explain how light traveled through space, as it was thought light was a wave. Sounds do not travel in the vacuum of space because there is no medium to transfer the energy through.
Gravity doesn't travel down to the earth either.
UnderManiac 1 year ago
@UnderManiac This guy doesn't know what he is talking about, it is simply air flow causing lift. However, I do believe in aether and I know all about the Michelson-Morley Experiment which made a wrong assumption about the characteristics of the aether. Atomic matter only corresponds to 5% of all the energy in the Universe, that is dark matter and dark energy make up the rest which might turn out to be an aether. You will find the aether makes a comeback very soon.
nikolayzou 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
True Free energy devices exist,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Be the revolution!
ivylsp 1 year ago
The question of vacuum function was settled 55-years ago, by the inventor of theis technology, in Paris, King of Prussia, PA, Winston Salem, North Carolina, and More recently in the USA and Japan.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
Comment removed
krussellm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not anti-gravity. Try doing this in a vacuum. No air, no lift.
krussellm 1 year ago
The charges in the lifter are both electric and magnetic because they are charged moving air molecules. The effective electrode size of the wire is really a 30mm radius tube of positively charged ions moving at the speed of sound. Aether will not flow in only a pure electric field. There must be both a magnetic and electric field between the charges for aether to flow.
Aether will flow in a magnetic charge field between a positive and negative magnetic charge. Thats called a magnetic dipole.
pmoneil 1 year ago
According to this man's explaination of how the device works if you turned the device side ways instead of going to the side it should still go up. I have personally tried this allready... It whent side ways and not up... So sir... try again.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@MrAwsome514
The lifter actually moves aether through itself causing the lifting force.
F=sin(x)vCV^2/d
x is the average angle between the velocity of the charged particles and the electric field lines. x can be determined by experiment.
v is velocity of charges. C the capacitance. V is the voltage. d is the wire plate distance.
this can be derived from applying lorentz force eq with magnetic charges
F=q1(E + vXB) + q2( B - vXE)
q1 is electric charge q2 is magnetic charge
pmoneil 1 year ago
@pmoneil Well according to the documents I procured directly from NASA which details thier own experiments on the devices they have concluded that it is just a simple ion wind effect and nothing more. Sorry but there is no antigravity here. And yes I would be more than happy to send you a copy of the documents if you like.
MrAwsome514 1 year ago
@pmoneil OMFG this is such a simple technology, The thin wire is charged with very high voltage, very low current and so ionises the air around the wire. These Ionised air particles are immediately attracted to the foil strip dragging neutral air particles with it and so producing thrust. The assembly (usually made of balsa wood frame or other light material) is sufficiently light for it to lift off. It will thrust in whatever direction u point it. there is no "anti-gravity" effect whatsoever...
ak74u123 1 year ago
@pmoneil Clearly no one has told you about the paper NASA put out in 2004. They did extensive testing with lifters and other asymetrical capacitors and found absolutely no evidence of an antigravitic effect being present at all. Their tests where quite thoroughly explained in the paper. Such detail was used that even a 10 year old could recreate some of the experiments. At least the ones not involving multi-million dollar equipment.
MrAwsome514 10 months ago
@MrAwsome514
I agree there is an airflow caused by the high voltage, not an antigravity effect. I built a lifter and photographed it running in a Schlieren setup and you can see the airflow around the high voltage wire moving down toward the foil electrode. The video is on my blog if you are interested. It's clear that there is quite a bit of turbulent airflow. Does that account for all the lift? I'm not sure but I bet its most (all) of it. - Otto
OttoBelden 10 months ago
Not to bash your lectures or anything but, I think alot of Browns work has been misunderstood... Alot has changed in the past 70 years and we understand things about subatomic particles that we didnt before. Ether is a term I think that is often used in the wrong context as well. Anyways great lecture, sound is kinda low XD
Crus777 2 years ago
bb effect is weak that is true. but how can u explain the lifter anomaly? do you have the equations? please share them with us herr capitain.
pmoneil 2 years ago
you go balsa craft!
pmoneil 2 years ago
From ThomasTownsend Brown's paper "How I Control Gravitation", SCIENCE AND INVENTION, August, 1929: F = Vm1m2/r2
Where F is the electrokinetic force in newtons or dynes, V is Voltage, m1 is the primary electrode, the cathode- the Saucer (negatively charged), m2 is the anode (positively charged) that is the forward electrode, or upper electrode in the VTOL vertical lifting version, r is the radius or area of the device to be flown horizontally or degravitated.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
That would mean that V would have to have dimensions of L^3/[MT^2] for the equation to balance. Does that sound reasonable to you?
flowerbower 2 years ago
do you have a copy of the paper?
pmoneil 2 years ago
@pmoneil This Ion wind effect does not work without air and so was abandoned for a means of space travel decades ago.
ak74u123 1 year ago
@Beamshipcaptain Do a youtube search on "lifter anti gravity. Find the video" Lifter Anti-Gravity Myth has been BUSTED 1 of 2".
You have no idea what you are talking about.
krussellm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you guys see a TheBeamshipCaptain commenting on these videos, it's not really Beamshipcaptain, it's an imposter. He's trying to ruin Beamshipcaptains good name.
mechaghostman2 2 years ago
IMHO , the charge causes ionization of the air around the wire. The air moves around the wires , and pushes against the air below it .
It still depends on the movement of air. It will not work in a vacumn .
There is no change in gravity or mass decrease on the device. It's a cool device all the same. I don't believe there is such a thing as anti gravity though, but I hope I am proved wrong some day.
adastra123 2 years ago
It does work in a vacuum, as tested for many decades, and works more efficiently in vacuum. Read the physics journals. Successful vauum tests 2 miles from me, exactly 50-years ago, 1959, at GE Space Center, King of Prussia, PA, right accrosss from the mall. Also at Societe construction Aeronautique du sud Oest, in Paris, France, 1955, successful tests of disc-airfils at less than a billionth of an Atmosphere. This is warp drive!
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
yes it does work in vacuum but will not work well in certain low vacuum ranges like 5 to 50 mm Hg. conductivity of gas increases with decreasing pressure to a minimum at 5mm. then below 5mm conductivity begins to drop again. so attempting to test lifter in low vacuum between 5 and 20 mm would cause the electrode to short out with the plate in this range. that is why some demostrations of evacuated lifter tests claim the lifter to be non functional in vacuum.
pmoneil 2 years ago
@pmoneil Space is not a perfect vacuum.
luc59457 1 year ago
@Beamshipcaptain Watch the video from MythBusters. Do a simple YouTube search on "lifter anti gravity". Look for video " Lifter Anti-Gravity Myth has been BUSTED 1 of 2".
Hence, you are an idiot.
krussellm 1 year ago
@krussellm Mythbusters are both actor KIDS, and corporate shills. THey could'nt get the Bedini free-energy motor to work either. Yet, a SCHOOLGIRL got one working, and its on YouTube. THe question of vacuum function was settle 50-years ago, and by one of my clients, John Fiala, who did vacuum chamber tests, and onboard power with a custom proproetary power-unit.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
nice engine you guys built there at ad astra. u could use a little gravity shielding.
pmoneil 2 years ago
pmoneil, "free" energy is long been here. The elite threaten, bribe - murder the many who've tried to introduce it.
I swear, it's as if the ppl on this planet have been put to sleep w/poppies!
The last line I quote is IMPORTANT:
"The reason alternating current can travel great distances with little resistance is because it folds space-time.
AC wires are more like antennas which provide an axis for the folds.
IF THE FREQUENCY & VOLTAGE ARE HIGH ENOUGH, NO WIRE IS NEEDED"
[astrotometry channel]
Yoetah 2 years ago 4
What's gravity shielding?
Yoetah 2 years ago
The nature of gravity and inertia is a separate lecture. But briefly, gravity can be viewed as a flow of aether in a downward diection. As it passes through mass it cause a drag effect. The lifter directs this flow around the mass which can be described as shielding similar to the way an umbrella shields one from the rain.
pmoneil 2 years ago
pmoneil, thanks for the explanation
Yoetah 2 years ago
Exactly right. Gravitation is a PUSH, due to a converging-flux of Ether. The Casimir-effect on a huge scale! But there is a micro-gravity-filed within the device that causes the Cathode-plate to do the lifting.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
great :) any working model for demo?
farhad43 2 years ago
There are many working models built all over the world. Search for naudin and lifter
pmoneil 2 years ago