Added: 6 months ago
From: TheYoungTurks
Views: 17,170
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (283)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The new paymasters of America, China, wont allow GOP policies that destroy their US assets, regarding the balance of payments deficit, mainly caused by oil imports & artificially quadrupling of oil prices, in turn caused by global warming deniers.

    As Jesus put it “Go and say to that fox, behold I cast out obsessions”. “Foxes have holes”. “Foxes that spoil”. “Foxes in the waste passages”.

    Can asinine leaven deniers go and commit suicide in private rather dragging America down to their hellhole?

  • wait wait wait wait wait.....did he just say "and it's gaining traction, facts are not"?

    You can't even say anything to this because they don't even try and hide that they're ignoring facts. Speechlessssss

  • @adda241 See? This is a great example of just how dumb the left is, including the idiots on the Turks Dopes Show. A news guy said 'seems' and then later 'facts'. Hilarious......you bozos use people on the enemy network who say your stoopid rhetorical keywords, and then say "that's proof". Absolutely hilarious. You won't even notice it happening, you're so full of kool aid.

    Please finish your GED and then tackle an easier issue.

  • @cr500blur I totally agree with you. They're such libtards using ''facts" to make their arguments. They should make real arguments like, ''because Jonah got swallowed by a whale.''

  • standard turks garbage, typical of the idiot left...

  • @cr500blur you can't be serious...did you watch the video?!

  • @adda241 - Duuuhhhh. Fox News is not in the business of proving or disproving the massive global warming myth. Scientists are.

    Again.......duuhhhhh.

  • @cr500blur Thank you for your insight...I give up.

  • @adda241 - Actually you shouldn't give up. You should go see what scientists have to say on the other side of the fence. For example, the founder of the Weather Channel, and thousands of others. Doesn't that make you stop and think at all? In the 70's it was global cooling. The weather runs in cycles and man can't cause it or stop it.

  • @cr500blur The founder of the weather channel, John Coleman, was a meteorologist (TV weatherman) who happened to team up with another entrepreneur to start the weather channel. They are far from sufficiently educated in the area of long-term CLIMATE change. 97% of climate scientists agree on the man-made cause of global warming. Also, MUCH of the things he's said about the topic has absolutely no science backing it up. Check his credentials before giving him credibility.

  • @adda241 - I'm sure you would take the time to vet every other name instead of just learning the FACTS for yourself. This link oughta be right up your alley for proof, by your way of thinking. i choose to learn about it myself...

    petitionproject dotta org

    The real data suggests different results than your so-called scientists believe. Hey...they have mortgages too.

  • @cr500blur Listen to yourself, not that it will make a difference. I HAVE done the research...that's why I have the opinion I do. You want me to ignore climate scientists and a near perfect consensus and chase some bullshit fitting a ridiculous right-wing agenda...based on what? Some baseless conspiracy theory you guys concocted for political reasons saying uhh yea...the scientists...and uhhhh...oh yea, facts are uhhhh....just wrong. It really is a shame there are people out there like you.

  • @adda241 - I'm sorry, but it's hard to keep from laughing at your ridiculous and arrogant comments. Neanderthals like yourself who think that the case is settled because YOU did the research are an example of frickin' retarded you leftist schmucks are.

    Newsflash simpleton...it's the data that matters, not what some group of scientists say or your political party. Morons can't think outside the box and will swallow lotsa kool-aid given the agenda. Funny thing, you say the same garbage...LOL..

  • @cr500blur Actually I have had a look at scientists on the OTHER side of the fence and came to the conclusion that they are waxers (like a waxing moon these people make the facts larger than what they really are, stretching the truth).

    Axe the Wax not the Carbon Tax!

  • co2 is .039% of the atmosphere

  • @mastapho - It's called "radiative forcing". Different gasses have different impacts on the greenhouse effect.

  • @A86 thanks, i learned something new

  • @Hughganaught - By 97% of climatologists in the field. What data are these other "scientists" basing their claims on?

  • I am sick and tired of you Faggot fucking Liberals trying to defame the only truth tellers left in the Mainstream Media, Fox News.

    If you don't watch Fox, you are NOT a Patriot. Fucking period, Libtards. My boys up there have set up the ONLY News outlet that respects the Constitution instead of glorifying Socialism like MSNBShit does.

    You can not beat us in a debate because you are simply not as informed as us, so refrain from even trying and embarrassing yourselves.

    Perry 2012 and 2016.

  • @FoxNewsFanatic4Life dude, perry was al gore's campaign manager

  • @thekoollemon That is a TOTAL LIE and merely a rumor fabricated by none other than ALEX JONES, that treasonous Enemy-of-America.

  • @FoxNewsFanatic4Life no, it's well documented just search rick perry al gore

  • The world has been cooling naturally for 13 years

  • TURKS = MUslims in suits..keep voting for liberals and you'll have higher taxes higher food costs and a lower standard of living..

  • If they have a brain room, that must mean all of the robot presenters aren't having to use theirs. :P

  • is palin in your brain room

  • Fuck Fox!

  • @datniggami6 u furry??

  • You have to have a brain to have a Brain Room.

  • If 'God holds the keys' than he's doing a sh!t poor job of managing things.

  • "brain room", matchbox, whatever.

  • global warming? God did it because we elected a muslim socialist marxist kenyan, PERRY/BACHMANN 2012!

  • @ImmaDwarfKicker why wasnt god mad at the retarded coke sniffing chimp we elected last time?

  • @snoop11080 ... i'm joking 

  • @ImmaDwarfKicker so was i really.

  • MOTHER BRAIN RUNS FOX NEWS??????????????

  • 0:41

    If the Brain Room held water then surerly it would be a Brain Tank.

  • Man-made global warming is a fraud. Al Gore wants to swindle us out of our freedom and pay him a lot of money.

    How arragant are you to think that man's activities can effect the planet. The earth's thermostadt is in heaven. And God has the keys.

  • @Hughganaught well even if humans aren't causing it to warm

    they're still causing pollution/acidrain/deforestati­on/mass extinction!!

  • @LobsterPotsticker Those issues have been addressed. With the legleslation of the last 40 years, acid rain is non-exicent and today we have more trees than we had in 1600AD. With the environmental leglesaltion of the last 40 years, much has improved.  The air is clean. Polliton is gone. Rivers don't burn and trash is picked up.

  • @Hughganaught everything you said is false.

    & if u were an archeologist you'd know how HUGE of a problem acid rainnn isssss

  • @LobsterPotsticker I don't like juck science or scams . And espceally swindelers from Tenneesee. The world is not over populsted. People are not locust. For the last 40 years, we have done nothing but pass more & more clean air standards & they still call for more. The ESA has shut down farming and free enterprize. It's where you can't live off the land anymore. It's not about the environment, All they want is control.

  • @Hughganaught - "we have done nothing but pass more & more clean air standards & they still call for more"

    Because, FYI, the world's largest polluters (the US and China) are polluting at higher rates than ever and now emerging countries like India and Indonesia are catching up. Globally we're putting out 29 gigatons of CO2 per/year. That's several times more than all the world's volcanoes combined going off at once. We've already almost doubled atmospheric CO2 in less than 300 years.

  • @A86 That's absurd. You environmentalists are dislusional. The more you get, the more you want. Untill your nit picky your way into the stone age. Besides God is in control. He allows all those gigatons of CO2 into the air and it won't kill the planet.. If you REALLY want to do something about global warming, repent.

  • @Hughganaught - You can't even spell "delusional", I'm supposed to believe you know more than scientists? If you're going to attmpet to call me "delusional" then use some facts to prove HOW I'm supposedly wrong. What am I supposedly wrong about?

    "Besides God is in control"

    Jesus H. Christ. BTW, no one said it will kill the planet. The planet will be fine. WE (humans) are fucked.

  • @A86 What's delusional is the concept that man is destructive enough to destroy the planet. Man is not that powerful to destroy his own nest through burning fossel fuels and such. What' delusional is the pagan religon of invironmentalism. Where you place man as more powerful than God. That nature is a shrine and must be worshiped. When God created nature as man's oyster. I can't point to facts, because it's all based on opposeing worldviews.

  • @Hughganaught - If man is putting out 29 Gigatons of CO2/year (which is more than 300 times all of the world's volcanic output of CO2 combined), yes, man is destructive enough to destroy himself (it's not destroying the Earth, dumbass). Man already proved himself more than capable of destroying himself and even harming the planet to a degree with the use of the atom bomb in 1945.

    "man as more powerful than God"

    Who says your "god" exists? If a god exists who says it will save man?

  • @A86 I don't belive you. I don't belive that 29 x29 gigations of CO2 will not harm the planet in any way. Just because your worldview says so. Because it's what you belive in your enviironmental religon. dosn't make it so.

  • @Hughganaught - I don't care what you BELIEVE, I care about what science KNOWS. We KNOW it harms us because global temperature has steadily increased, the number of catastrophic storms have steadily increased and the number of floods have increased. The polar caps are steadily melting and the ocean levels are rising. This isn't just a bunch of random coincidences, this is scientific FACT.

    Burying your head in the ground like a damn ostritch won't make it go away.

  • @A86 True science is based on Fact. True science concurs with the Bible. True science is not based on lies and fraud. As is Darwinism, Global warming is a lie and a fraud. emails have exposed this. I wouldn't care, except that morons like you will force stupid laws down my throat that imfringes on my properity rights

  • @Hughganaught - True science is based on facts. If the Bible does not concur with the facts then the Bible is not scientific.

    "As is Darwinism, Global warming is a lie and a fraud"

    Evolution is established scientific fact. Might as well deny the Theory or Gravitation. Global warming is a scientific fact established by 97% of climatologists worldwide.

  • @A86 "Established fact" by whom? There are plenty in the scientific community who do not follow Al Gore's line. Al Gore is out to get rich through fraud and control the world through this hoax.. He's a SWINDLER a LIAR and a FRAUD. No way will I belive that burning fossel fuels is causeing these problems. Do you actually belive that oil comes from fermented dinsaour guts?

  • @Hughganaught - Gore did not invent the global warming theory. Turn off the Fox and Chris Monckton. Chris Monckton is on the dole of oil companies which makes billions per year not having to clean up their waste and keeping uninformed people like you on Big Oil/Col.

  • @Hughganaught - Established by 97% of the climatologists in the field. What data are these other so-called "scientists" basing their claims on?

  • @A86 Facts. That you "97% climatoligists" is bogus. a lie. Your data is a lie and mine isn't.

  • @Hughganaught - Nope, it's quite accurate:

    content (.) usatoday (.) com / communities / sciencefair / post / 2010 / 06 / scientists - overwhelmingly - believe - in- man- made - climate - change / 1

    Try listening to climate scientists instead of pundits and politicians.

  • @A86 "Scientists" from liberal left leaning colleges and universities? Evolution, Climate change and Environmentalism are nothing more than a belif system. A Pagan belife system, a reliogn where superstition trumpts scientific fact. It is you who are wrong

  • @Hughganaught - Lol So scientists are only correct if they're right-wing? What is your evidence all climatologists are "liberal"?

    "Evolution, Climate change and Environmentalism are nothing more than a belif system"

    Evolution and Climate Change are scientific FACT. Christianity is nothing more than a belief system with almost no evidence.

  • @A86 The waters have been muddied to where we don't know up from down. The worldview of a left leaning environmentalists is far diffrent from a conservetave Christian creationists. Look at the big picture, who made the greatest discoveries? Christians or pagans?

  • @Hughganaught = "The worldview of a left leaning environmentalists is far diffrent from a conservetave Christian creationists"

    Yes, the former is based on facts while the latter is based on fiction.

  • @Hughganaught - "emails have exposed this"

    Are you referring to that stupid "Climategate" hoax? Please take your head of your ass and learn something:

    /watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg

    Learn what you're talking about before repeating some rumors you heard on Fox News or whatever Tea Party website. Listen to scientists instead of corporate shills. If you insist on talking out of your ass send me a report of the so-called "real figures".

  • @Hughganaught - "If you REALLY want to do something about global warming, repent"

    You are a fucking moron. Now sin is causing CO2 output rates to increase?

    Well, maybe you're right in a sense. The sin of corporate greed certainly is by polluting at fantastic rates and paying off government officials to kill regulation that would slow or cut pollution rates.

  • @A86 CO2 output is irrevelant.

  • Fox news scientists? Isn't that an oxymoron?

  • Hmmm scientists or fox news, who is a more credible source regarding scientific data? You lose Fox.

  • they right global warming is not real

  • I envision their "Brain Room" as an empty closet with a lot of cobwebs.

  • Heres a breakdown of fox and friends

    1. on your left you have your silver spoon fed, high functioning retard, with a glaze over perpetual deer in the headlights look....occasionaly you have to poke him with a stick so he remembers to breath

    2. in the middle you have your pyscho babble bullshit spewing blond bimbo...with the ability to change its facial appearence like a chameleon yet keep the same personality

    3. and lastly on the right a typical closet homosexual yesman

  • LOL, I love how they just redirected the whole segment. Global warming to Peryy, bloody retards

  • I think FOX news should bring in Pat Robertson concerning this 'global warming' debacle. He'll set things straight. Pollution is gods way of weeding out the Muslims and homosexuals and people that watch pornography create pollution. Pray the CO2 away!!!

  • @mrselfdestruct23 not sure if troll or just hilarious troll.

  • @mrselfdestruct23

    Hallelujah brother.

  • Brain room?! Ha. That's an oxymoron for FOX news. Since when do 'facts' and conservatives ever coincide?! Their sugar daddy is the industrial complexes and oil companies that are belching contaminents into the atmosphere every day. That's why they're opposed to green energy and call people that want to go green, 'tree hugging freaks'. What, do they honestly think there will be no consequences. Don't they get that the world and all its properties are symbiotic? Arrogance and ignorance.

  • ecuuuuuse me correlation

  • "brain room" seems just about right, because everyone on fox news share the same brain.

  • @OmieBearMegaHead001 and the left doesn't?

  • @hopeurforfreedom fuck the left too! happy?

  • 330 ppm is not much CO2 compared to earths past. In fact, it is pretty damned low historically. When we had over 1,000 ppm, how come we cooled and didn't have runaway heating?

  • @hopeurforfreedom , we did have very hot temps when the CO2 levels were high, arctic areas were not arctic then. The point is man has interfered with a natural cycle by emptying carbon syncs that took millions of years to from. We are returning carbon to the atmosphere in a matter of decades that has been locked up for millions of years. Please, lets not have an argument that the earth is not billions of years old.

  • I gotta give Huntsman some credit. The few times he's gotten some national attention I've liked what he has to say.

  • Stupid jerks!!!

  • Off subject, but why do right wankers disown right wankers running for office and fail. For instance, the buttfuck who called Mccain a liberal on this channel. On subject, even fox comedy admits g.w. is real in their own little comedic way. But you buttfucks still deny it. Before you were just ignorant. Now we know you guys are really stupid. As hell. Really, really stupid.

  • @nalani005 The Fox Television Network and the Fox News Channel are two seperate entities. Everybody knows that there was only one Conservative on the Republican ticket in 2008 and it wasn't McCain.

  • FOX's "brain room" is actually a broom closet where their on-air personalities store their brains in jam jars for the duration of their employment.

  • @Capng123 Kinda gotta wonder what else might be in that closet...

  • @Packerd01 Except that I don't see so much willingness in america these days. You bring a subject to show a part of the problem: voting, just voting... Just how many person are ready to spend 15 minutes of one day and vote for a president? 55%. Obesity rate? This is what, 35%? And 60% of overweight? As a parody of my view, take Grand-pa Simpson asking Homer Simpson to do something... And, now, take me as Liza, looking at that "yeah, grand-pa is not a really good one, but what Homer will do?"

  • Nobody realized that it's real because it's not..

  • Your closed caption spelled out "brain tumor" when you said brain room!

    XD

  • @Packerd01 I think you don't get what I'm saying: he can only do that much since Ron Paul is human... The actual situation is such that nothing will make the USA work really well.

    Let's compare that to something else, let say Nascar: if the V8 is working on 5 cylinders, that there is water in the carburetor, that the front break does not work, and there is a flat tire on a rear wheel, and we are 2 laps behind and 25 to go. Do you really think that any drivers could won a race with such a car?

  • @Packerd01 I tell you what is wrong with is plan: as nice as it sound, the monetary and fiscal policy he advocate give a favor the one who are already saving. In other word, not the boomer and most eldery. Sure, they will have the choice, to work or have their home taken away by the bank can't take that risk anymore. The sad thing is, he is the only candidate who got a brain, but if it to finish in some sort of banana republic at the place of a failed state...

  • when i hear "fox's brain room" i think of a big empty room with like an empty peanut shell sitting on a tabel

  • It is a 107 degrees at 8pm here in Central Tx., it was 111 dergrees a few hours ago! I have never seen it this hot here, that I can remember. The friggin North and South poles are melting, freak storms and earthquakes everywhere happening on a consistent basis, the mother-loving magnetic field around the earth is going haywire, it is dryer than a camels ass here in the south central US because of no rain in ? day's, and some non-scientist pundit says there is no Global Warming? FMTT's.

  • @007HubbaBubba Lions and Tigers and Bears oh my. Lions and Tigers and Bears oh my. Hey Dorthy you might want to look to see who's behind the curtain of your Global Warming hoax.

  • @chaumont20 "who's behind the curtain of your Global Warming hoax"  its called the laws of physics....

  • @antipyrene You should know their your buddies. The anti oil, anti capitalist and anti corporation crowd. Basically your friends but you already know that.

  • @chaumont20 Facts and the laws of physics know no ideology...we can argue about what to do about them, but arguing against verifiable reality is just delusional and self destructive

  • @antipyrene Well then I guess I will let you get you get back to your anti oil, anti capitalist and anti corporation friends in your bubble of group think. Enjoy but remember to never question your facts, your laws of physics or your ideology.

  • @chaumont20 What facts do you dispute underlying global warming, the fact that Co2 traps heat, the fact the planet is getting warmer, or the fact we pumping far more CO2 into the atmosphere than the biosphere can absorb, through the burning of fossil fuels?...or you just spewing ideological driven bullshit?

  • @antipyrene I dispute any science which is funded and advanced by anti oil, anti capitalist and anti corporation Ideologists but by all means feel free to keep chasing your tail about it. I will be listening closely for a Presidential candidate who will seriously defund the EPA.

  • @chaumont20 Ah spewing ideologically driven bullshit, I see

  • @antipyrene " Ah spewing ideologically driven bullshit, I see " Really, that's exactly what you've been posting all day long. You could be talking to your family about these subjects but they abandoned you long ago.

  • @chaumont20

    The subject of global warming is being researched by scientists all over the world with many different backgrounds and ideologies. This has nothing to do with political opinions. Yes, the left tends to promote it a lot, but they're simply repeating the facts as presented by scientists. If this was all based on politics, you wouldn't have the vast majority of scientists agreeing with each other on the issue.

  • @123BlueKnight OK but 97% of scientists who agree on global warming are anti oil, anti capitalists and anti corporation but we're are all supposed to believe that the global warming science has no bias. My common sense sees all sorts of red flags flying.

  • @chaumont20 Why is it so important to you that we like oil and corporations. Do you contest that oil does not pollute? Also, a lot of the middle class and lower class conservatives believe that buying local and from family owned businesses is a great thing.

  • @123BlueKnight Not all scientists, even those from NASA agree with AGW.

  • @hopeurforfreedom should have had a (?) at the end of that sentence, sorry..

  • @123BlueKnight It has lots to do with political opinion.  By the way, do you know what affects the winds on Mars?

  • @antipyrene I might believe your bullshit if you can tell me why Mars is warming up, without man-made emissions...

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    The activity of Martian winds causing dust storms is perhaps a reason? Seriously a five minute Google search can do wonders. There is an interesting National Geographic article on it. It's not like scientists are saying it's impossible for a planet to warm up without human interference. The point is that humans are making it worse.

  • @123BlueKnight  Winds? I believe winds are also one reason Antarctica ice caps are melting, are they not? Ever thought about the sun?

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    The sun is not warming. We can measure that and ITS NOT HAPPENING.

    Good god, what kind of moron do you have to be to think Climatologist somehow forget to include sun activity in their findings that GW man made.

    Climatologist know about the influence of the sun...ITS THEIR JOB.

  • @todoke We don't know much about the Sun, we are just beginning to study i closely. You might want to read up on that.

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    You dont have to know alot about the sun to see if its warming or not. All you need is to monitor the heat radiation, which we are doing for decades with satellites. You point a satellite with a infrared sensor to the sun, you mesure if it gets hotter (while taking distance and orbital changes into account) DONE

    The sun has not gotten hottern. Its a fact, look it up

  • @todoke Do you know what a sunspot is? Are you that simple?

  • @todoke energy from the sun constantly varies. The sun is not static...

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    Yea and the Earth kept on warming as solar activity recently dropped...

  • @sdrawkcabgnipytmi , solar activity is increasing, we are heading toward maximum.

  • @zaurakdigis

    Actually you're wrong.

    I suggest you watch this: watch?v=_Sf_UIQYc20

  • @sdrawkcabgnipytmi , wrong about what? Are you saying we are not coming out of solar minimum and heading toward solar maximum. IE, increased sun spot and solar flare activity. I assure you we are and our sun is a variable star. I watched the video I fail to see that proves my statement wrong. Our planets albeido interacts with the sun, that is what effects temperature. BTW, I am not a man caused climate change skeptic, mans impact on the climate is profound through carbon and deforestation..

  • @zaurakdigis

    Oh sorry, I got you mixed up with someone else there.

    You're right, we are heading for a solar max. That said, we've gone through a minimum over the last 40 years or so all the while the globe kept warming. So it's not like the sun can be used to explain the current changes.

  • @123BlueKnight Certainly you don't believe the sun is static....

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    Oh thats easy, just watch this:

    watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM

    What other Global Warming "skeptics" myth do you have?

  • @todoke no, you tell me the facts.

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    Well the facts are:

    We produce alot of greenhouse gases

    Greenhouse gases trap heat

    The earth is observably warming.

    The sun is not getting warmer

    Scientist have been researching the warming for over 50 years

    They concluded that the warming we are seeing is not natural and is caused by humans

  • @todoke If CO2 is the problem, then why did we not have runaway warming when the earth had 500 ppm?

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    There are parts of earths climate history which are not fully understood. What scientist are arguing is that the heating we are seeing NOW(like the last 250 years) seems very likely to not be natural. We have way better data and models for this recent climate period simply because we have been there, observing and mesuring it.

  • @todoke you might want to say some conclude, instead of all. You look silly saying that...

  • @hopeurforfreedom

    97% of active and publishing climatologist agree that human are causing the warming. Thats not "some" thats the vast majority, very close to all. You are the one looking silly saying its just "some"

    btw i didn't say "all", i said "they".. because 97% reflects a heavy consensus

  • @todoke The sun is heating, you might want to look it up, I have, you haven't.

  • @todoke  climatologist? You might also find they are mostly leftists...

  • @todoke ever check the corellation between CO2 levels and the oceans temperatures? 1940's we had about the same CO2 levels as now.... How is that?

  • @todoke Before you get to believing some of the crap you spew, you might learn a thing or two about the sun and about pre-industrial CO2 amounts. Ice coring, which your crowd loves to use is a piss poor method of gathering the data. You might want to read how they did their testing. If you need help on how coring is done, I'll get you some info...

  • @todoke heating and cooling of the the earth from the sun depends mostly on sunspots... though the sun does have other patterns we are just learning about.

  • @todoke Do you think CO2 is constantly increasing in our atmosphere?

  • @hopeurforfreedom You might want to actually read those articles you are taking out of context...Mars is warming slightly because dust storms have uncovered darker ground, which holds onto heat

  • @antipyrene and what causes the increase in winds? An increase in energy from the sun, which is burning hotter.

  • @hopeurforfreed (1/4)

    If you wonder about the sun's effect, it would be a good idea to look the question up on reputable scientific web sites or in a science text instead of posting here. Try the Stanford Solar Center. But the short answer is that the sun cannot be the major factor. According to a NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), "...the solar increases do not have the ability to cause large global temperature increases...greenhouse gases are indeed playing the dominant role.."

  • @hopeurforfreedom (2/4)

    "Since the last solar minimum of 1996, the Sun's brightness has decreased by 0.02% at visible wavelengths, and 6% at extreme UV wavelengths, representing a 12-year low in solar irradiance, according to this NASA news article (April 1, 2009)." Ibid

  • @hopeurforfreedom (3/4)

    "“The small measured changes in solar output and variations from one decade to the next are only on the order of a fraction of a percent, and if you do the calculations not even large enough to really provide a detectable signal in the surface temperature record,” said Penn State meteorologist Michael Mann.

    The link between solar activity and global warming is just another scapegoat for human-caused warming, Mann told LiveScience."

  • @hopeurforfreedom (4/4)

    And you are wrong on all accounts and even the regular press has reported the scientific findings that debunk the Solar claim.

    "... a new analysis of data on the sun's output in the last 25 years of the 20th century has firmly put the notion to rest. The data shows that even though the sun's activity has been decreasing since 1985, global temperatures have continued to rise at an accelerating rate." The Guardian

  • @hopeurforfreedom Its part of the normal weather cycles of Mars...there is zero, repeat ZERO evidence of increased solar output

  • @antipyrene Are you that stupid? Zero evidence of increased solar output? You might educate yourself. Google "sun heating up". Problem with AGW folks, they do not study the sun much, too busy trying to shut down capitalism. We know very little about the sun, only in the last few years has it been well studied.

  • @antipyrene leftist putz, you might try arguing with NASA and UCLA, for you are so stupid you'll never believe me. The sun is heating up, you dolt.

  • @antipyrene uh, give me your evidence of zero increased solar output.  this ought to be good......

  • @antipyrene  My evidence is NASA and confirmed by UCLA, what is yours, some leftist site?

  • @hopeurforfreedom Didn't you get the shit owned out of you by @Rundstedt1a few posts back? Looks like he/she covered every point needed and even cited specific articles. The sun heating up in 2011 has nothing to do with global warming; in fact it was in its deepest minimum in over a century for several years prior. Also, we know rather a great deal about the sun as we've been studying it for quite some time longer than "a few years." I'd like to see your evidence to the contrary.

  • @AletheianAeon Sorry, dumb ass, you better learn the new facts about the sun. Try learning what we've learned in the last few years, you dope. Right we had the longest minimum in well over a century, however, if you knew what the fuck you were talking about the sun had been heating well before that. Sunspots, you moron, allow the heat to escape you fucking shit head.

  • @AletheianAeon dumb ass, sunspots don't make the sun hotter, they simply allow the sun to release more energy. So much for being owned.... As for evidence to the contrary, read what we've learned about the sun in the last few years so you won't look so stupid. the sun is a hard thing to study, but you wouldn't know that because you don't know crap. Most of what we've learned about how the sun works has been learned in the last decade you nimrod.

  • @hopeurforfreedom You go read about what we've learned about the sun, you shit shooting little skunk. You claim NASA backs you up, but a five second Google search reveals the following NASA source regarding the mechanisms of global warming: climate(dot)nasa(dot)gov/cause­s/ Oh look, things we already knew but wannabe intellectual knicker stains like yourself seems hellbent to deny. Satellite studies of the sun since 1978? You're wrong: NASA says you're wrong; stop using NASA as a source.

  • Fox knows 3 important things about Climate Change.

    1.) That is true & they have seen all the evidence that supports

    2.) It's bad for business as usual & hurts most of their traditional right-wing, big-business supporters bottom line

    3.) Fox knows that the vast majority of its viewers are too unsophisticated, uneducated, unread, and are so emotionally invested in the authority of Fox News pundits that they will not dare question the "global warming is a hoax" mantra that Fox feeds them daily.

  • @Packerd01 Also "it show how stupid and misinformed you are about libetarianism and real conservatism" -> no, it show how you are misinformed... There is 130 million person born before 1965 in USA, 52 million before 1945. Do you really thing they want to put their shirt on and work for 55 hours a week for another 25 years? Or they want to stay at home, at some point in their life? Do you really think Dr. Strangelove is still relevant today?

  • @Packerd01 Oh cock! You compare Ron Paul to whom? Ueli Maurer of the SVP/UDC? He is one among seven leader in a directory system, and he is some sort of center-right conservative (UDC is the French name, it mean the union of the center). I never ear Ron Paul wanted to cut the taxes of only 5 to 10%, get a better train system, pass law to have less noise near airport, pushing hydropower and green energies including production at home or even have more sport at school (these are SVP's position).

  • "Well the facts are against Rick Perry, but since conservative voters don't care about facts...score one for Rick Perry!"

    Disgusting

  • Extreme weather is here to stay!

    Everyone should look forward to all of the hurricanes, blizzards, tornadoes, droughts and famine coming our way. We won't see the end of it in our lifetimes.

  • gosh fox news is fucking stupid

  • If conservatives have any altruism it shouldn't matter if they believe in global warming or not. They would want to be good stewards of our God given resources. They are supposed to be conservative, why not conserve our resources so the next generation can share in our blessings. There is no logical reason to not reduce reuse recycle , study to limit emissions etc. the only reason is laziness and too much attachment to money. money that could greatly improve or world into the future