@Philip88888888 a black hole pulls infinity hard at point blank range. Fission and fusion reaction can infinity generate power. So yes it is real and only the blind & brainwashed don't see it.
@leaualorin According to quantum physics, empty space is seething with almost unfathomable amounts of energy and everywhere there are particles which inexplicably blip in and out of existence. Given that, I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that we may be able to harness that energy.
@terracethornhill 1. According to Richard Feynman, no one understands quantum physics. 2. While there may be unfathomable energy in the quantum field, it is currently impractical and inefficient to extract this energy, as it is not radiated energy, like solar energy, nor is it propagated using an electromagnetic means. It is strong force and electroweak, which is hard to use and far more expensive than current technology and knowledge allows. And forget about gravity energy.
@chaosopher23 I'm just saying that the situation isn't cut and dry, we live in a vast sea of energy and I don't think it's that big of a stretch to think it might be possible to tap into some of that energy using technology.
Plus, that heater isn't necessarily doing anything that exotic, I just think they found a more efficient method of converting electricity into hot water than electrical resistance. It vibrates the water to heat it. I think of it as kind of a mechanical microwave effect.
Throw out the law of conservation of energy on the word of a fireman? Lets use Occam's razor on this dilemma; the firemen here are duped (or simply liers) OR long standing scientific laws are being broken?
Did anyone see anyplace on that company website where THEY are making such claims? You know it may be a big deal to the nobel prize for physics nominating committee -- IDK there may be some free advertising in it too.
@AMilitantAgnostic this video is part of a docu called "it runs on water", the company who made the machine you've seen in this vid has a website and is w w w (dot) hydrodynamics (dot) com
Nothing is more than 100% efficient but if you are using a heat pump then you can get more heat since you move the heat from one place to another you do not produce that amount of heat as with a heat element.
So a heat pump similar to the one in air conditioning unit but with the cycle inverted can provide more heat using the same amount of electricity than a normal heat element even 3 to 5 times more.
So generating heat is not the same as moving ( pumping ) heat.
Similarly star scientific limited has found a legitimate very efficient means of producing energy. Search for star scientific limited. Watch the video in the footsteps of fusion. If you are already familiar with alternative clean energies then skip ahead to 10min and 30 seconds.
wow freeenrgydebunker you are such a douche bag. do you work for the electric company or something an you just dont wana loose your job lol. you obviously dont no what you are talking about those are fireman backing that up an you wana say it not true.
@oldhippy111 Like I said, it depends on what you're talking about. It's a shame we can't provide links to other sites here, the proof is all over the net. Google heat pump efficiency and learn something. If you can put the proper codes back in, this is a good one.
For all the silly naysayers, and braindead....this product is already in production within the marketplace. get your head out of the sand and wake up to the 21st century....The Earth is not flat!
if it were more than 100% efficient it would start a nuclear reaction and destroy the earth, as it would only get hotter and never cool down. They have a reverse entropy device.
So what does a heater have to do with two grown men showering together? Is that where they are getting the heat from? Are they using the black guys or the white guys certified measuring device?
To hell with the so called skeptics, they never leave the house.
True skepticism creates questions which the skeptic answers by formulating theory and experiment to prove or disprove.
The academic expectation for someone else to do all the thinking and experimenting isn't skepticism it's just plain old fashioned dumb laziness of the weak mind.
...The beer bottle armchair academic philosophers arguing the construct of their imaginary book world and never conducting the simplest experiments lol
buy or build one if you want proof. learn to do it if you want skillz. if you just want to know....what for? so you can talk about it and pretend to have skills.
academics are soooo goddamn worthless I get tired of their drivel. If your going to be an egghead at least get your hands dirty and be a real egghead not an academic poser
the easily-est way to test efficiency is to take the exhausted steam and use it to power the motor the make the steam and see if it runs after being started to begin with if it continued to run indefinitely that it would be 100% efficient i don't see them trying that also if its the claimed 170% efficient it should run itself as well as something else with it free energy this is stupid and complete bullshit
if people like flashtoorov would stop suvking dick and use the talent to build devices like these to see if they work we would live in a new world. get your head out of your crotch and see the world, im building one of these .
I have recently had experience with what may be zero point energy. My latest psychokinesis video demonstrates me causing unexplainable movements to 2 ping pong balls.
Please view the video on my channel. THIS IS NOT SPAM, this is for real, and I would encourage any scientists out there to view my video too.
I know I am tapping an unseen energy source with my mind, and with time & practice, I should develop to more advanced levels, including levitation of objects.
They are for sale in domestic form in Moldova, the Yusmar. Quite cheap as well. Strange that we do not see them elsewhere, except the US commercial job who only make large units. Griggs say it not suitable for domestic , yet Yusmar make one, operating slightly different to the US one. They look very useful indeed. Only one electric motor and an on-demand hot water. The same for the heating system. Simple and easy, just a few controls around it like a gas boiler/furnace has
This is cavitation heating of water. It's not special. It's not over unity.
Your certified instruments are being used by someone who doesn't know what they are doing when it comes to measuring all the inputs and outputs. For a start, have a look at the electric motor driving the pump. Pretty beafy isn't it. Bet it requires a fair whack of electricity to start and run.
yes it use less electricity then any other steam generator, but it is not more then 100%... and plain and simple, prove it! i never take any one word at anything, i look at facts and facts only, and i yet to see any facts the prove its more then 100%, this tech is not new its been around for a long time, and the fact point to a great steam generator but no where close to 100%
one must remember that if you can speed up the process of state change or even do it economically, you get to release that latent heat energy elswhere. If there is any doubt, consider the heat pump or ammonia based refirgeration. Both devices are COP>1. Overunity if you want to call it that. So is a sailboat, more energy in, than effort by the sailor. It's not rocket science its just clever use of available energies using phenomenons already known.
You take the ambient pressure of the city water inflow, and you take the concept of a Vortex (Tesla et others) and you take hydrodynamics and friction and voila, you have more BTU of heat, than electricity in. If the math of all phenomenons could be worked into it,likely, no physical laws would be violated. In other words, its not free energy, its just real smart is what it is.
So to answer your question "Why wouldn't they..." It's simple. They wouldn't because: 1. The want heat as efficiently as possible. 2. They don't want to incorporate a grossly inefficient turbine into the equation as x-thousands of dollars, ruining their ROI. 3. The total cost of creating heat this way is costing them less than if they did it "the old way" so they KNOW they are winning. There would be no video, if they weren't. They'd be embarassed, and silent.
There is no self running unit because doing so would involve the inefficiencies of the said turbine to create electricity. This creates steam for heat. At a lower cost than combustion of fossil fuels. Using Electricity, but no heat. Why ruin the COP>1 with power generation? Your comment makes no sense whatsoever, you are missing the entire point here. Nobody said they needed to spend an additional 10,000 on a steam turbine, think about it!
it uses cavitation to bail water into steam, there are videos on youtube about it and how it works. but if it was truely more then 100% and this idea has been in use for over 70 years why is there no self running one? (because its not over 100%)and the electricity they use to power the motor is most likely from a none green source, NY gets its power from 30% Natural Gas, 10% Oil, 20% Coal, 21% Nuclear, and 19% Hydro Electricity
However the Title is wrong the "heater" engine is powered by electricity with a big motor which is still mostly produced by burning fuel. So it's no more a fuel less heater than any electric heater kettle, immersion, fan convector, etc.
A heat pump can be over 300% "efficient" as regards electricity in and heat out thats why they are used in heating applications. It's just that you have to figure out where the extra energy is coming from. At present the Griggs engine (shockwave engine) seems to do something similar It's just that noone can work out where the extra energy comes from.
A heat pump can be over 300% "efficient" as regards electricity in and heat out thats why they are used in heating applications. It's just that you have to figure out where the extra energy is coming from. At present the Griggs engine (shockwave engine) seems to do something similar It's just that no one can work out where the extra energy comes from.
@evidenceonly Ignorance... look at you cunts, blinded a brick wall established in a physics text book hahaha. Dont you fucks understand that science can be written, disproved, rewritten, altered, and written again?
More than 100% efficient??? That guy is fooling no one but himself. I don't care if his measurement equipment has been certified. The METHODS they used to run their measurements are flawed if they think they are getting >100% efficiency. He's just another one of those "free energy morons".
REAL Free energy technology exists!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
This is only a clip from the UK TV series Equinox entitled "It runs on water" first airing in 1995. The company that makes the device mentioned is "Hydro Dynamics, Inc" and they have a website that you can google.
Hi , any body know where we can buying this fuelless water heater, is no address, some body please send me where can i buying one ! My address: csak1@bigpond.com Regards Joe
@EnglishTurbines yup. and looked like footage from the 1950s, and trucks from the 40s... u know its bonafide pseudoscience when the media breaks the story, just like over unity stan, and the radiowave/burning water man, all of which the world is still awaiting evidence for...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jeebersjumpincryst Thats a very large electric motor turning that drum to make hot water on demand. ...Glad I aint paying the electric bill thats for sure...LOL....These people are just deluding themselves.
@EnglishTurbines Yeah - I totally agree. After looking at quite a few of these claims on youtube and net, I think I'd say that people who claim this are just totally unaware of many of the definitions and concepts, and also the laws of physics that govern the universe we inhabit. Magnets seem a real favourite, as does electrolysis to produce H2 gas. I'd love to see the casimir effect being harnessed in a usable quantity and way, but I think we are still a ways off yet... ;-)
if they had actually created such a device, they sure as HELL wouldn't be working as firemen any longer..........they'd all be driving Lambos. What a LOAD.
Why so much noise with free power? This is the trick: Put 2 big tires on the rear axle of your car. Now put 2 small tires at the front axle and there you go, YOUR CAR IS ALREADY GOING DOWN HILL without having to take it to the top of the hill. (learned from the silly gardener when studing engineering. Damn me, shouldn't have studied that shit)
yes I would bet that they are using the water pressure to run a generator of some sort. Its kinda like when duche bags say that electric cars use no fuel. Nobody talks about the coal that it takes to charge it..........dumb asses.
@jesuriah they probably calculated the energy added to the water incorrectly. Stupid firemen. its a simple calculation like: Δq = m • Δt • cp and of course (Δq /energy consumed by machine)*100 = less than 100%.
@aradioactivedonut, I believe that this device were actually given output more than 100% because as the water heat up inside the device, the device also taken heat from ambient heat(surrounding heat) to heat up the water. As the input, which measure by the electrical motor, the lost count was the extra heat taken from ambient heat. The device were actually cold during operation and heat from outside were taken inside the device while operating -Malaysian Born Physics-
@deackenz Don't be ignorant. The law of the conservation of mater and energy clearly defines this as impossible. Since when do we issue scientific credibility to firemen?
@aradioactivedonut Mmmm...I'm not actually imply that the fireman or scientific discovery of any sort, I did built this device myself in Mar2008 for educational propose and yes, the power of 160watt electric motor compare with the output joule of the water that been heated were increase nearly 200%. But I notice myself that the Hydrosonic® pump or the device were cold (not just cool) during operation.
@aradioactivedonut I’m a physics graduate (BSc. Hon), work as Oil & Gas Offshore Planning & Engineering for living and do Reverse Engineering in my spare time. My conclusion after examine this device, yes, the other heat source was been taken from ambient heat energy anywhere near the device. This device now as one part of my swimming pool filters to make me a cheap hot water dipping. Don’t worry, the energy law still conserve and the universe still in balance during operational of this device
@deackenz If it absorbs all of the excess energy from ambient heat, then your not generating energy, your delegating consumption to the earths atmosphere or your heating bill. Its not some miraculous free energy device, its not even viable for a power plant design, it wont produce net energy in the form of electricity, its just a big refrigerator running backwards. The only reason I am criticizing this video and marginalizing its credibility is because of the description, which is a load of bs.
@aradioactivedonut I like your thinking ability to understand the law of the universe, as to free energy; I don’t think this device was related to any free energy. They (as I am) just used it to heat up water as to save bill. If actual bill should be $300 for normal electric filament heater per month, using this device will cut the bill in half monthly. Just imagine how my bill looks like if I wanted to heat up my swimming pool water using conventional electric water heater? :)
@aradioactivedonut and yeah...I agree, based on the descriptions, was total BS. I think "theoneagain" did not know the different between free energy (zero point energy) heater and cavitation water heater... hehehehe...just look at him...so shame...
Naked men, and some pipes...Do you think would could include some actual information too please. Testimonials are nice but what the heck are they talking about. I left this vid learning nothing.
Hmmm why would someone even need to use an instrument to prove something is over 100% efficient....Such a device should be able to simply run itself with no additional imput....and that would be proof enough!
I was shown about 20 ears ago a unit like what is shown. I did not build one as I thought it would not work. It seemed so simple , I was thinking why has no-one made these before.Thanks for showing the generator and the setup.
The electric motor that spins the cavitator is provided with electricity, the generation of said electricity is where the fuel is used. It is similar to saying that an electric heater "doesn't use fuel". A agree with everone else...what happens if you stop supplying it with a high water pressure...does the energy output fall to less than unity?
Ive seen this so many times, people always focus so blindly on the instruments, "this is newly calibrated" "this is a cerified instrument" "this is the most accurate and expensive instrument there is" but there is more to instruments than hooking it up and reading the digits.
u guys out there still believing in your goverment, scientist, doctor go and believe the 911 lies, fill your body with flourides and get your mercury FLU shots and pay your energybill every month, meanwhile we build our own free energy devices, disconnect our homes from the grid and have 12KW/h ready to use dayin dayout.
even the best bearings on the planet cause friction so there is no way 100% is ever possible ...unless this guy has a fusion reactor to heat the water lol
They should just rename this video proof of God, since it is about nothing, you can call it anything. Maybe the flying fire truck, or water people from planet 9. I wish we could vote on deleting videos. This one would get my vote.
@sliderglider - Get a clue, dude. The rotor with the holes in it is VERY close to the outer casing and spins the water through the holes so fast it heats it up. How simple does it have to be explained? What ARE you, a Democrat?!
Oh the rotor is VERY close to the outer casing? well why didn't they say so, that explains everything! Someone call Al Gore.
I have been making biodiesel and ethanol over the years and one thing I know is that there are no "simple" alternatives to fossil fuels. Nothing is free except bullshit, conspiracy theories, and voodoo. Ideas like overunity are nice concepts- prove them with good science, or the public will continue to call any alternative to fossil fuels BS.
@sliderglider This is not a fuel alternative, this is bogus. It breaks the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It seems they arent trying to create a fuel alternative, but instead want to create a perpetual motion machine...
The day someone makes a machine that can run its self and put out energy, ill believe (and doesnt sap energy from changes in atmospheric pressure or heat differences).
@TheWater911 I agree that the second law of thermodynamics still stands, however world economies currently rely mainly on fossil fuels to function, so any overunity or perpetual motion machine concepts are a direct challenge to the fossil fuel dilemma in my view. Not to mention a tempting boondoggle for profit, as you know many have tried and all have failed so far.
"This is not a fuel alternative, this is bogus. It breaks the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It seems they arent trying to create a fuel alternative, but instead want to create a perpetual motion machine..."
You are wrong on both points. It works and is for sale in the US and Moldova (Yusmar)
@sliderglider we could very easily power the whole world with one geothermic power plant. we have the technology to do so, all the resources, and all the man power. but whos gonna build it? Also whos going to fight off all the power plant owners? The US gov. has all the means necessary, but you think they will ever actually do it? F**k no. They have their hands too far in your pockets doing it the old fashioned way.
@Ravalat I agree, Want to change the way the governments sanction fossil fuel powered economies? Join the debt revolt. Use No credit, make NO payments, barter,trade and pay for goods and services directly It's legal, non violent and will be very effective. Money is the real power and the people control that power collectively, without it the banks cannot foster debt slavery and the petrodollar crashes. It would also end the Federal Reserve if the revolt is sustained long enough. WE CAN DO THIS!
@sliderglider the fed is on its way out soon anyway i think.. ron paul became chairman of the dept, and he hates the fed.. hes been in chair for 1 week and already dug up TONS of stuff on them that they have been doing behind our backs. such as (bailing out foreign banks with US dollars, which diminishes our currency) they've done it more than a few times.. and they'll only show him 1/2 the records. shes now he is sopeanaing them clear to the supreme court for the rest. cant wait to see it :)
@sliderglider you really believe in the infinity of the universe there doesnt somewhere exist something better? Look at history and invention. In decades to come people will be amazed that we used fossil fuels and they will be regarded as a poor option. Just because an alternative hasnt been discovered yet doesnt mean one doesnt exist. I hate when because of having limited knowledge in a certain field people think they know everything when really we as humans understand very little
@clintdelicious If by "better" you mean a scientifically verifiable new means of useful energy production then yes I think that there are viable alternatives to currently known energy sources and systems. However if one decides to publish material illustrating a new miracle machine which breaks or bends the known laws of physics without scientific proof...expect that publication to get flamed and pwned. All we skeptics ask for is reproducible definitive proof.
@Fiercefighter2 yea nuclears great ile pay your ticket to go to fukushima and do a month long study on its awesomness ; \ surprised to see theres still retards saying its good energy, its not even clean far from it
@smiles1969able You probably only think that because of the medias influence. So many naive people automatically turn against anything with the word nuclear in it. You think Hydro power sounds nice? or even most other energy sources. They are all statistically more dangerous than nuclear power. And in comparison to coal its very clean.
@mattymuck NO im not naive i live in New Zealand we have an anti nuclear policy for good reason, you need to do your home work before you say nuclear energy is cleaner than coal you total dumb ass, look into spent fuel rods you fucking moron, and hydro power is safe and clean, why the fuck do you think Russia is discontinuing its nuclear plants? because its clean NO because its safe NO because they have seen what its done in the past and is still doing now. once again look into spent fuel rods!
@smiles1969able LOL fail, hydro is safe and clean? When its actually been the most dangerous type of energy production in the past. You obviously have no idea what the affects of burning coal are. No energy production is clean, but some are better than others... The amount of energy you get from the small amount of waste created in nuclear power is multiple fold greater than coal. It's a joke to even compare them, do YOUR homework you've been brainwashed.
Very enjoyable thank you
jayejayeee 2 days ago
Don't know what to think.
albedran2 4 days ago
This is a superb video..
If you want to get the Plans for the Magnetic Generator.
Just go to Google search for "Best Magnetic Generator Review"
Select the First Results (just avoid the Ads)
JackSmith898989 1 week ago 4
This is so stupid. The only measuring device you should be using, i-...
ah screw it. I've had a long day. I don't feel like thinking of something witty.
craphappychinesepapy 2 weeks ago
I can prove it's not 100% efficient with the simplest argument... it's making a noise.
Panthur6502 3 weeks ago
I think those 2 guys are whats making the water HOT.
jonnyasprin 4 weeks ago
I would't want to have an engineers degree from the college or university that did the measurments on this BS.
GDplusEng 1 month ago
Why did you take me into the bathroom when they were having a shower?
Riot454di 1 month ago
The stupidity of the world, think what over 100 percent efficient means. Infinite energy is not real.
Philip88888888 2 months ago
@Philip88888888 doesn't mean infinite energy, cus the conversion to heat is easy, but not the other way around.
Sebbofc 1 month ago
@Philip88888888 a black hole pulls infinity hard at point blank range. Fission and fusion reaction can infinity generate power. So yes it is real and only the blind & brainwashed don't see it.
starknight97 10 hours ago
@leaualorin According to quantum physics, empty space is seething with almost unfathomable amounts of energy and everywhere there are particles which inexplicably blip in and out of existence. Given that, I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that we may be able to harness that energy.
terracethornhill 2 months ago
@terracethornhill 1. According to Richard Feynman, no one understands quantum physics. 2. While there may be unfathomable energy in the quantum field, it is currently impractical and inefficient to extract this energy, as it is not radiated energy, like solar energy, nor is it propagated using an electromagnetic means. It is strong force and electroweak, which is hard to use and far more expensive than current technology and knowledge allows. And forget about gravity energy.
chaosopher23 2 months ago
@chaosopher23 I'm just saying that the situation isn't cut and dry, we live in a vast sea of energy and I don't think it's that big of a stretch to think it might be possible to tap into some of that energy using technology.
Plus, that heater isn't necessarily doing anything that exotic, I just think they found a more efficient method of converting electricity into hot water than electrical resistance. It vibrates the water to heat it. I think of it as kind of a mechanical microwave effect.
terracethornhill 2 months ago
As efficient as that device is, it's not "fuelless" as it runs on electricity.
terracethornhill 2 months ago
Throw out the law of conservation of energy on the word of a fireman? Lets use Occam's razor on this dilemma; the firemen here are duped (or simply liers) OR long standing scientific laws are being broken?
Did anyone see anyplace on that company website where THEY are making such claims? You know it may be a big deal to the nobel prize for physics nominating committee -- IDK there may be some free advertising in it too.
AMilitantAgnostic 3 months ago
@AMilitantAgnostic this video is part of a docu called "it runs on water", the company who made the machine you've seen in this vid has a website and is w w w (dot) hydrodynamics (dot) com
brightmannn 3 months ago
@brightmannn Yes I know about the website - They make no such claims -
If they did the law suit would go like this:
Attorney: "You say your machine here produces more energy than it consumes, for a net gain in energy?"
Defendant: "Yes"
Attorney: Judge I would like to call (any physics or engineering authority in the world)
Attorney: Sir, (authority ) is this BS or what?"
Authority: "Beyond BS its a total scam pulled on the ignorant"
Judge: (to the defendant) "give em lots 'O money"
AMilitantAgnostic 3 months ago
If you want to get the Magnetic-Generator plans
Just search Google for "Top Magnetic Generator"
Click the First result (Skip the Advertisements) TopMagneticGenerator(dot)Com
I found it to be a great resource
FlowersAll 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anyone tried___ w w w diymagneticmotor com ?
70pda 4 months ago in playlist magnetic motor and electric vehicles
Nothing is more than 100% efficient but if you are using a heat pump then you can get more heat since you move the heat from one place to another you do not produce that amount of heat as with a heat element.
So a heat pump similar to the one in air conditioning unit but with the cycle inverted can provide more heat using the same amount of electricity than a normal heat element even 3 to 5 times more.
So generating heat is not the same as moving ( pumping ) heat.
electrodacus 5 months ago
Similarly star scientific limited has found a legitimate very efficient means of producing energy. Search for star scientific limited. Watch the video in the footsteps of fusion. If you are already familiar with alternative clean energies then skip ahead to 10min and 30 seconds.
Dwvose1 5 months ago
once you reach a critical mass of BS, it spontaneously heats itself.
LifesVoyager 5 months ago 6
____ w w w diymagneticmotor com has FREE energy INFO ____
tyuiwas 6 months ago
wow freeenrgydebunker you are such a douche bag. do you work for the electric company or something an you just dont wana loose your job lol. you obviously dont no what you are talking about those are fireman backing that up an you wana say it not true.
jpyz450f 6 months ago
laws of physics need to be re written^^
ironjudas666 7 months ago
more than 100% is bullshit
oldhippy111 7 months ago
@oldhippy111 Not necessarily, the space shuttle throttles up to 104% while achieving orbit. It's just a matter of what standard you choose to use.
LarryH54 7 months ago
@LarryH54 sorry man no such thing as more than 100%
and we aint talking abou the space shuttle
so much bull WHU cant people just be real............its a shame such abuse of a good thing
oldhippy111 7 months ago
@oldhippy111 Like I said, it depends on what you're talking about. It's a shame we can't provide links to other sites here, the proof is all over the net. Google heat pump efficiency and learn something. If you can put the proper codes back in, this is a good one.
worldchanging com archives 007844
LarryH54 7 months ago
@oldhippy111 2 be more than 100% bullshit is bullshit isnt it lol?
smiles1969able 7 months ago
Scam scam scam scam scam scam.... quality scaaamm....
a1mint 8 months ago
the average person would day baloney!
The average physicist would also say baloney!
Idea if these things really work then:
1. Hook on up to a generator
2. Feed the electricity back into the grid
3. Repeat ad-nausium until you rich
But of course it doesn't work so you would never actually make any money with the above method.
pandapup9001 8 months ago
For all the silly naysayers, and braindead....this product is already in production within the marketplace. get your head out of the sand and wake up to the 21st century....The Earth is not flat!
hydrodynamics*com/technology/
clbackus 9 months ago
This video is fake. It's taken from a porn movie called "Flaming Fire Fighters". They just dubbed in a fake voice over.
Nomoreidsleft 9 months ago
if it were more than 100% efficient it would start a nuclear reaction and destroy the earth, as it would only get hotter and never cool down. They have a reverse entropy device.
bastian74 9 months ago
So what does a heater have to do with two grown men showering together? Is that where they are getting the heat from? Are they using the black guys or the white guys certified measuring device?
nordis2001 9 months ago
@nordis2001 LOL!!!!!
valleart 9 months ago
To hell with the so called skeptics, they never leave the house.
True skepticism creates questions which the skeptic answers by formulating theory and experiment to prove or disprove.
The academic expectation for someone else to do all the thinking and experimenting isn't skepticism it's just plain old fashioned dumb laziness of the weak mind.
...The beer bottle armchair academic philosophers arguing the construct of their imaginary book world and never conducting the simplest experiments lol
lostbuffalo 9 months ago
buy or build one if you want proof. learn to do it if you want skillz. if you just want to know....what for? so you can talk about it and pretend to have skills.
academics are soooo goddamn worthless I get tired of their drivel. If your going to be an egghead at least get your hands dirty and be a real egghead not an academic poser
lostbuffalo 9 months ago
the easily-est way to test efficiency is to take the exhausted steam and use it to power the motor the make the steam and see if it runs after being started to begin with if it continued to run indefinitely that it would be 100% efficient i don't see them trying that also if its the claimed 170% efficient it should run itself as well as something else with it free energy this is stupid and complete bullshit
yesac101 10 months ago
@yesac101
"the easily-est way to test efficiency is to take the exhausted steam and use it to power the motor"
Too many state conversions. All these days is measured in kilowatts. It is easy to measure the Kw in the motor to the kW out in steam.
NearAbbeyRoad 7 months ago
fake
xarmxrave 10 months ago
This is bullshit, look at the size of that motor!
mmaaxx1198 10 months ago
if people like flashtoorov would stop suvking dick and use the talent to build devices like these to see if they work we would live in a new world. get your head out of your crotch and see the world, im building one of these .
vernch777 10 months ago
There is not any explanation for this "engine" if it is one, and how it functions.
72Yonatan 11 months ago
@72Yonatan
Look up "hydrosonic pump"
NearAbbeyRoad 7 months ago
IDIOTS
90flyer2223 11 months ago
It's a miracle...halleluja.
ammerudgrenda 11 months ago
More than 100% efficient? Wow, where can I invest!!!!
tabhorian 11 months ago
I have recently had experience with what may be zero point energy. My latest psychokinesis video demonstrates me causing unexplainable movements to 2 ping pong balls.
Please view the video on my channel. THIS IS NOT SPAM, this is for real, and I would encourage any scientists out there to view my video too.
I know I am tapping an unseen energy source with my mind, and with time & practice, I should develop to more advanced levels, including levitation of objects.
Thank you.
ChrisZanetti 11 months ago
More than 100% efficient? Suck more dick.
Flashtoorev 11 months ago
So you spend 5 million for this to save 30 bucks a month. Sounds great.
cooldog60 11 months ago
@cooldog60
They are for sale in domestic form in Moldova, the Yusmar. Quite cheap as well. Strange that we do not see them elsewhere, except the US commercial job who only make large units. Griggs say it not suitable for domestic , yet Yusmar make one, operating slightly different to the US one. They look very useful indeed. Only one electric motor and an on-demand hot water. The same for the heating system. Simple and easy, just a few controls around it like a gas boiler/furnace has
NearAbbeyRoad 7 months ago
the dolts didnt say one word about how it works as usual
aacrowley897 11 months ago
could anyone please give me the adress of the supplier of this system ??
Thank you
R.Chemayel
email : chemayel2@yahoo.com
Rajachemayel 11 months ago
could anyone please pass me on the adress of the manufacturers of this system ??
R. Chemayel
Amsterdam , The Netherlands
chemayelě@yahoo.com
Rajachemayel 11 months ago
This is cavitation heating of water. It's not special. It's not over unity.
Your certified instruments are being used by someone who doesn't know what they are doing when it comes to measuring all the inputs and outputs. For a start, have a look at the electric motor driving the pump. Pretty beafy isn't it. Bet it requires a fair whack of electricity to start and run.
bunjit1 1 year ago
yes it use less electricity then any other steam generator, but it is not more then 100%... and plain and simple, prove it! i never take any one word at anything, i look at facts and facts only, and i yet to see any facts the prove its more then 100%, this tech is not new its been around for a long time, and the fact point to a great steam generator but no where close to 100%
1crazyfocker 1 year ago
one must remember that if you can speed up the process of state change or even do it economically, you get to release that latent heat energy elswhere. If there is any doubt, consider the heat pump or ammonia based refirgeration. Both devices are COP>1. Overunity if you want to call it that. So is a sailboat, more energy in, than effort by the sailor. It's not rocket science its just clever use of available energies using phenomenons already known.
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
You take the ambient pressure of the city water inflow, and you take the concept of a Vortex (Tesla et others) and you take hydrodynamics and friction and voila, you have more BTU of heat, than electricity in. If the math of all phenomenons could be worked into it,likely, no physical laws would be violated. In other words, its not free energy, its just real smart is what it is.
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
Comment removed
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
So to answer your question "Why wouldn't they..." It's simple. They wouldn't because: 1. The want heat as efficiently as possible. 2. They don't want to incorporate a grossly inefficient turbine into the equation as x-thousands of dollars, ruining their ROI. 3. The total cost of creating heat this way is costing them less than if they did it "the old way" so they KNOW they are winning. There would be no video, if they weren't. They'd be embarassed, and silent.
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is no self running unit because doing so would involve the inefficiencies of the said turbine to create electricity. This creates steam for heat. At a lower cost than combustion of fossil fuels. Using Electricity, but no heat. Why ruin the COP>1 with power generation? Your comment makes no sense whatsoever, you are missing the entire point here. Nobody said they needed to spend an additional 10,000 on a steam turbine, think about it!
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
"our measurments said it's more than 100% efficient"
Well, time to check your measurements again, it's making you look like a horses ass.
daw162 1 year ago
it uses cavitation to bail water into steam, there are videos on youtube about it and how it works. but if it was truely more then 100% and this idea has been in use for over 70 years why is there no self running one? (because its not over 100%)and the electricity they use to power the motor is most likely from a none green source, NY gets its power from 30% Natural Gas, 10% Oil, 20% Coal, 21% Nuclear, and 19% Hydro Electricity
1crazyfocker 1 year ago
Comment removed
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
Comment removed
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
Comment removed
KyleCarrington 1 year ago
How to build fuel less heater
fugi2002bx 1 year ago
Hmm, I wonder why heat pumps aren't measured in "efficiency" but as "performance"...
krap101 1 year ago
Bravo!!!! very informative video. I'm buildin one one.
uncageable 1 year ago
However the Title is wrong the "heater" engine is powered by electricity with a big motor which is still mostly produced by burning fuel. So it's no more a fuel less heater than any electric heater kettle, immersion, fan convector, etc.
bobvar69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A heat pump can be over 300% "efficient" as regards electricity in and heat out thats why they are used in heating applications. It's just that you have to figure out where the extra energy is coming from. At present the Griggs engine (shockwave engine) seems to do something similar It's just that noone can work out where the extra energy comes from.
bobvar69 1 year ago
A heat pump can be over 300% "efficient" as regards electricity in and heat out thats why they are used in heating applications. It's just that you have to figure out where the extra energy is coming from. At present the Griggs engine (shockwave engine) seems to do something similar It's just that no one can work out where the extra energy comes from.
bobvar69 1 year ago 3
well its nice of ya to show us whats its about geeeeeee
frank0067 1 year ago
come on over 100%
bunybread 1 year ago
if it is so good then why is it not on the market, or at least give the manufacturing company's name
steglitz100 1 year ago
@steglitz100
James L Griggs Hydrosonic pump.
Hydro Dynamics, Inc.
8 Redmond Ct NW
Rome, GA 30165
Phone: 706 234-4111
Fax: 706 234-0702
thinkdifferent2765 1 year ago
So if I wanted one of these in my house, I would have a big ass noisy generator, naked fireman, and a guy that doesn't know shit. Well done everyone.
musclekid13 1 year ago
Great few men in shower. guess thats all the heat they needed
svlion1977 1 year ago
They don't know how to measure output correctly. Lame.
ZoeMarks 1 year ago
Powered by hot air of the creators
heatflash888 1 year ago
if that was true then u could hook up an steam engine to a electric generator and power the world for free
moecat1000 1 year ago
He is wasting his steam to prove ---------
shiva4k60 1 year ago
WI-FI with fooltooth .
shiva4k60 1 year ago
dumbasses.
rocr62 1 year ago
I'm an average engineer . And guess what I say ? .......B-AL--ONY
evidenceonly 1 year ago
SURE you're measuring devices , were certified , but were you ? What measuring devices did you use ? A bucket of kerosene and a piece of string ?
evidenceonly 1 year ago 11
@evidenceonly har har d har
briddle2 10 months ago
@evidenceonly Ignorance... look at you cunts, blinded a brick wall established in a physics text book hahaha. Dont you fucks understand that science can be written, disproved, rewritten, altered, and written again?
Stevenwilliams11 9 months ago
@evidenceonly
He said the local "university" tested it.
NearAbbeyRoad 7 months ago
More than 100% efficient??? That guy is fooling no one but himself. I don't care if his measurement equipment has been certified. The METHODS they used to run their measurements are flawed if they think they are getting >100% efficiency. He's just another one of those "free energy morons".
xrayrep 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be a part of the energy revolution!
despinapjr 1 year ago
Why show a Shower scene??
xtaxplayer 1 year ago
what if this was just a giant production of a troll?
matasmal 1 year ago
there's a huge electric motor attached to that thing, how can it be 100% efficient?
ccmtor 1 year ago
@ccmtor the heat enegy out put is more than the electrical enegy in put.
cronauer1985 1 year ago
oh can you smell that yep thought so bull s@@t
marshgatelaneposse 1 year ago
This is only a clip from the UK TV series Equinox entitled "It runs on water" first airing in 1995. The company that makes the device mentioned is "Hydro Dynamics, Inc" and they have a website that you can google.
DracoXul 1 year ago 2
Bunch of fucking bullshit. The only thing that produces more energy than used to make it is nuclear. Over 100% pure bullshit.
lakewood85 1 year ago
@lakewood85 Fission obeys thermodynamics as well.
mynameissooriginal2 1 year ago
Fuck! what is it?
prentis45 1 year ago
The Oil companies are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity.
Look for the LT MAGNET MOTOR in youtube video search. Join the Revolution!!
buchananfibbing 1 year ago
@buchananfibbing You're dumb.
PlaguedMaggot 1 year ago
Hi , any body know where we can buying this fuelless water heater, is no address, some body please send me where can i buying one ! My address: csak1@bigpond.com Regards Joe
Joecsak1 1 year ago
Don't let the soap fell down, ladies!
Leopoldo888 1 year ago
I have a fueless engine too but the little cage really burns through the hamsters...
godslittlehelpa 1 year ago
I guess my blender, stove, microwave, and space heater are all "fuelless" too!
jib1000 1 year ago
more than 100 percent efficient is impossible. I call bullshit.
dieselwarriordotcom 1 year ago
Yay no fuel! (not counting that coal plant 5 miles down the road generating the electricity to run it) ;)
BlenderFreak777 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As soon as I heard an American accent, I knew it was going to be crap. Sure enough, when he said more out than in, I knew I wuz right...LOL
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
@EnglishTurbines yup. and looked like footage from the 1950s, and trucks from the 40s... u know its bonafide pseudoscience when the media breaks the story, just like over unity stan, and the radiowave/burning water man, all of which the world is still awaiting evidence for...
jeebersjumpincryst 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jeebersjumpincryst Thats a very large electric motor turning that drum to make hot water on demand. ...Glad I aint paying the electric bill thats for sure...LOL....These people are just deluding themselves.
EnglishTurbines 1 year ago
@EnglishTurbines Yeah - I totally agree. After looking at quite a few of these claims on youtube and net, I think I'd say that people who claim this are just totally unaware of many of the definitions and concepts, and also the laws of physics that govern the universe we inhabit. Magnets seem a real favourite, as does electrolysis to produce H2 gas. I'd love to see the casimir effect being harnessed in a usable quantity and way, but I think we are still a ways off yet... ;-)
jeebersjumpincryst 1 year ago
Yeah that's a sun water heater...
Rhinoch8 1 year ago
if they had actually created such a device, they sure as HELL wouldn't be working as firemen any longer..........they'd all be driving Lambos. What a LOAD.
foxchemdry1 1 year ago
Hmm fuel less? What are they doing, turning it by hand?
Rayden440 1 year ago
SO many free energy devices, so little time for TPTB
TrutherD1 1 year ago
Publish the name of the University, so that I can make up t-shirts to celebrate their retardation1
CommentClown 1 year ago
Why so much noise with free power? This is the trick: Put 2 big tires on the rear axle of your car. Now put 2 small tires at the front axle and there you go, YOUR CAR IS ALREADY GOING DOWN HILL without having to take it to the top of the hill. (learned from the silly gardener when studing engineering. Damn me, shouldn't have studied that shit)
lesliejonesmx 1 year ago
where can i get one?
spanglerangle 1 year ago
It's cool, i like how it works... but fuel-less? It still needs to be plugged into the wall. Get your facts straight.
Andyman395 1 year ago 2
what a load of shit ,100% shit more like
andyeynort1 1 year ago
no fuel, no gas, a lot of energy power.
jerejose 1 year ago
they should just stick to shower scenes
bachhell 1 year ago
yes I would bet that they are using the water pressure to run a generator of some sort. Its kinda like when duche bags say that electric cars use no fuel. Nobody talks about the coal that it takes to charge it..........dumb asses.
bachhell 1 year ago
nuclear weapons are 1000 percent efficient
kindlydragon 1 year ago
Some info would have been nice...Plus its impossible to have a machine with 100% efficiency. Someone messed up.
jesuriah 1 year ago
@jesuriah they probably calculated the energy added to the water incorrectly. Stupid firemen. its a simple calculation like: Δq = m • Δt • cp and of course (Δq /energy consumed by machine)*100 = less than 100%.
aradioactivedonut 1 year ago
@aradioactivedonut, I believe that this device were actually given output more than 100% because as the water heat up inside the device, the device also taken heat from ambient heat(surrounding heat) to heat up the water. As the input, which measure by the electrical motor, the lost count was the extra heat taken from ambient heat. The device were actually cold during operation and heat from outside were taken inside the device while operating -Malaysian Born Physics-
deackenz 1 year ago
@deackenz Don't be ignorant. The law of the conservation of mater and energy clearly defines this as impossible. Since when do we issue scientific credibility to firemen?
aradioactivedonut 1 year ago
@aradioactivedonut Mmmm...I'm not actually imply that the fireman or scientific discovery of any sort, I did built this device myself in Mar2008 for educational propose and yes, the power of 160watt electric motor compare with the output joule of the water that been heated were increase nearly 200%. But I notice myself that the Hydrosonic® pump or the device were cold (not just cool) during operation.
deackenz 1 year ago
@aradioactivedonut I’m a physics graduate (BSc. Hon), work as Oil & Gas Offshore Planning & Engineering for living and do Reverse Engineering in my spare time. My conclusion after examine this device, yes, the other heat source was been taken from ambient heat energy anywhere near the device. This device now as one part of my swimming pool filters to make me a cheap hot water dipping. Don’t worry, the energy law still conserve and the universe still in balance during operational of this device
deackenz 1 year ago
@deackenz If it absorbs all of the excess energy from ambient heat, then your not generating energy, your delegating consumption to the earths atmosphere or your heating bill. Its not some miraculous free energy device, its not even viable for a power plant design, it wont produce net energy in the form of electricity, its just a big refrigerator running backwards. The only reason I am criticizing this video and marginalizing its credibility is because of the description, which is a load of bs.
aradioactivedonut 1 year ago
@aradioactivedonut I like your thinking ability to understand the law of the universe, as to free energy; I don’t think this device was related to any free energy. They (as I am) just used it to heat up water as to save bill. If actual bill should be $300 for normal electric filament heater per month, using this device will cut the bill in half monthly. Just imagine how my bill looks like if I wanted to heat up my swimming pool water using conventional electric water heater? :)
deackenz 1 year ago
@aradioactivedonut and yeah...I agree, based on the descriptions, was total BS. I think "theoneagain" did not know the different between free energy (zero point energy) heater and cavitation water heater... hehehehe...just look at him...so shame...
deackenz 1 year ago
@deackenz
The worst part is that he probably does know the difference, and is taking advantage of ignorant people to get views, subscribers and comments.
aradioactivedonut 1 year ago
@aradioactivedonut Nice quote...and that's the worst...pity him...hahahaha
deackenz 1 year ago
Naked men, and some pipes...Do you think would could include some actual information too please. Testimonials are nice but what the heck are they talking about. I left this vid learning nothing.
nullbit88 1 year ago 3
Hmmm why would someone even need to use an instrument to prove something is over 100% efficient....Such a device should be able to simply run itself with no additional imput....and that would be proof enough!
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
I was shown about 20 ears ago a unit like what is shown. I did not build one as I thought it would not work. It seemed so simple , I was thinking why has no-one made these before.Thanks for showing the generator and the setup.
neillickfold 1 year ago
Maybe they generate the heat while taking a shower.Friction causes warmth ;-)UUUuuaaahhh
tyrefire 1 year ago
nothing is more than 100% efficient... your getting energy from other sources without realizing thats the only explanation
shorty40merza 1 year ago 2
The electric motor that spins the cavitator is provided with electricity, the generation of said electricity is where the fuel is used. It is similar to saying that an electric heater "doesn't use fuel". A agree with everone else...what happens if you stop supplying it with a high water pressure...does the energy output fall to less than unity?
lineswine 1 year ago
Ive seen this so many times, people always focus so blindly on the instruments, "this is newly calibrated" "this is a cerified instrument" "this is the most accurate and expensive instrument there is" but there is more to instruments than hooking it up and reading the digits.
swedishpirate 1 year ago
u guys out there still believing in your goverment, scientist, doctor go and believe the 911 lies, fill your body with flourides and get your mercury FLU shots and pay your energybill every month, meanwhile we build our own free energy devices, disconnect our homes from the grid and have 12KW/h ready to use dayin dayout.
ozelot 1 year ago
@ozelot whoa buddy, take it easy:D
TrevorMFTW 1 year ago
learn to spell!! "more energy out THAN in"
rich991980 1 year ago
even the best bearings on the planet cause friction so there is no way 100% is ever possible ...unless this guy has a fusion reactor to heat the water lol
Dragonstud 1 year ago
What a load of crap lol
pjaussiemovies 1 year ago
There goes the first law of thermodynamics blown to shit...
InfernoPL88 1 year ago
No fuel, no gas and no proof of anything. Completely forgettable.
dtecum 1 year ago
I volunteer to be the one to come along and 'prove you different'! let me know!
bspille 1 year ago
They should just rename this video proof of God, since it is about nothing, you can call it anything. Maybe the flying fire truck, or water people from planet 9. I wish we could vote on deleting videos. This one would get my vote.
MeTubeZero 1 year ago 2
hahaha
i have to agree with marcus3379
they didnt even show the fuckin generator
however we did get to see half naked firemen...
weird
gavinwhb 1 year ago 29
BWAHAHAHA
Fuel less heater, No fuel, No gas.......No content
Another excellent piece of journalism
rated five WTF's!!!
sliderglider 1 year ago 28
@sliderglider - Get a clue, dude. The rotor with the holes in it is VERY close to the outer casing and spins the water through the holes so fast it heats it up. How simple does it have to be explained? What ARE you, a Democrat?!
tubularguynine 1 year ago
@tubularguynine
Oh the rotor is VERY close to the outer casing? well why didn't they say so, that explains everything! Someone call Al Gore.
I have been making biodiesel and ethanol over the years and one thing I know is that there are no "simple" alternatives to fossil fuels. Nothing is free except bullshit, conspiracy theories, and voodoo. Ideas like overunity are nice concepts- prove them with good science, or the public will continue to call any alternative to fossil fuels BS.
sliderglider 1 year ago 7
@sliderglider This is not a fuel alternative, this is bogus. It breaks the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It seems they arent trying to create a fuel alternative, but instead want to create a perpetual motion machine...
The day someone makes a machine that can run its self and put out energy, ill believe (and doesnt sap energy from changes in atmospheric pressure or heat differences).
TheWater911 11 months ago
Please watch:
World's Greatest Amount of Compression Ratio Engine
TABAGfrancis 11 months ago
@TheWater911 I agree that the second law of thermodynamics still stands, however world economies currently rely mainly on fossil fuels to function, so any overunity or perpetual motion machine concepts are a direct challenge to the fossil fuel dilemma in my view. Not to mention a tempting boondoggle for profit, as you know many have tried and all have failed so far.
sliderglider 11 months ago
@TheWater911
So what would be wrong with a device that utilizes atmospheric pressure and heat differences? Would it not also be an alternative to fossil fuels?
72Yonatan 11 months ago
@TheWater911
"This is not a fuel alternative, this is bogus. It breaks the 2nd law of thermodynamics. It seems they arent trying to create a fuel alternative, but instead want to create a perpetual motion machine..."
You are wrong on both points. It works and is for sale in the US and Moldova (Yusmar)
NearAbbeyRoad 7 months ago
@sliderglider we could very easily power the whole world with one geothermic power plant. we have the technology to do so, all the resources, and all the man power. but whos gonna build it? Also whos going to fight off all the power plant owners? The US gov. has all the means necessary, but you think they will ever actually do it? F**k no. They have their hands too far in your pockets doing it the old fashioned way.
Ravalat 10 months ago
@Ravalat I agree, Want to change the way the governments sanction fossil fuel powered economies? Join the debt revolt. Use No credit, make NO payments, barter,trade and pay for goods and services directly It's legal, non violent and will be very effective. Money is the real power and the people control that power collectively, without it the banks cannot foster debt slavery and the petrodollar crashes. It would also end the Federal Reserve if the revolt is sustained long enough. WE CAN DO THIS!
sliderglider 10 months ago
@sliderglider the fed is on its way out soon anyway i think.. ron paul became chairman of the dept, and he hates the fed.. hes been in chair for 1 week and already dug up TONS of stuff on them that they have been doing behind our backs. such as (bailing out foreign banks with US dollars, which diminishes our currency) they've done it more than a few times.. and they'll only show him 1/2 the records. shes now he is sopeanaing them clear to the supreme court for the rest. cant wait to see it :)
Ravalat 10 months ago
@sliderglider you really believe in the infinity of the universe there doesnt somewhere exist something better? Look at history and invention. In decades to come people will be amazed that we used fossil fuels and they will be regarded as a poor option. Just because an alternative hasnt been discovered yet doesnt mean one doesnt exist. I hate when because of having limited knowledge in a certain field people think they know everything when really we as humans understand very little
clintdelicious 9 months ago
@clintdelicious If by "better" you mean a scientifically verifiable new means of useful energy production then yes I think that there are viable alternatives to currently known energy sources and systems. However if one decides to publish material illustrating a new miracle machine which breaks or bends the known laws of physics without scientific proof...expect that publication to get flamed and pwned. All we skeptics ask for is reproducible definitive proof.
sliderglider 9 months ago
@sliderglider Nuclear is a great alternative, more specifically the travelling wave reactor, very exciting technology.
Fiercefighter2 9 months ago
@Fiercefighter2 yea nuclears great ile pay your ticket to go to fukushima and do a month long study on its awesomness ; \ surprised to see theres still retards saying its good energy, its not even clean far from it
smiles1969able 8 months ago
@smiles1969able You probably only think that because of the medias influence. So many naive people automatically turn against anything with the word nuclear in it. You think Hydro power sounds nice? or even most other energy sources. They are all statistically more dangerous than nuclear power. And in comparison to coal its very clean.
mattymuck 7 months ago
@mattymuck NO im not naive i live in New Zealand we have an anti nuclear policy for good reason, you need to do your home work before you say nuclear energy is cleaner than coal you total dumb ass, look into spent fuel rods you fucking moron, and hydro power is safe and clean, why the fuck do you think Russia is discontinuing its nuclear plants? because its clean NO because its safe NO because they have seen what its done in the past and is still doing now. once again look into spent fuel rods!
smiles1969able 7 months ago
@smiles1969able LOL fail, hydro is safe and clean? When its actually been the most dangerous type of energy production in the past. You obviously have no idea what the affects of burning coal are. No energy production is clean, but some are better than others... The amount of energy you get from the small amount of waste created in nuclear power is multiple fold greater than coal. It's a joke to even compare them, do YOUR homework you've been brainwashed.
mattymuck 7 months ago
@mattymuck so damming water is dangerous? fuck off you stupid cunt eat your spent fuel rods
smiles1969able 7 months ago