Are you a truth seeker? Search for "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then click on "The Present" to open it. What it says will blow your mind.
Not bad, but I object to your depiction of atoms as looking like little solar systems. We both know that is inaccurate and misleading, and I wish you'd change those electrons to the probability clouds that they are.
Stardrive explains EVERYTHING using only simple mechanics.
I state CERN hardly has a clue about the inner works of our universe, and I CHALLENGE THEM to debunk the unified theory STARDRIVE. I claim Stardrive is superior to Newtons, Einsteins and CERNs work!
If you think I'm boasting and you want to silence me, just debunk Stardrive =D
@St00sh13 Believe it or not, but I've created perpetual motion by accident in 1982, proving my theory. However to demonstrate it on purpose I have to modify atom crystals...
So it's the other way around: CERN cannot prove their model; their theory is just a theory. Plus they are bogged down in the mud using incoherent and false assumptions, whilst Stardrive explains everything using simple mechanics.
It's not my problem if people focus on CERN instead of VEDODER.EU.
@St00sh13 Keep on thinking the world is as flat as a pancake. It's just a matter of time before I win you over.
Perpetual motion of the first kind means tapping power from the aether (dark matter if you will). It COMPLIES with the first law of thermodynamics. Einstein's SPACETIME DOES NOT COMPLY, since it turns energy into matter and vice versa. So who's the dokey now? (hint: rethorical =D).
I dunno.... I believe in science in all of its aspects but I do believe a higher power (i.e. God) created all of it..... kinda calming and beautiful really - it's like we're working our way closer to shaking His hand :)
@drche420 why are you confused. the way that God designed this universe is amazing to me. i dont have to be feeble minded and call myself an athiest just because i study a science.
Could it be that, where science is exposing so much detail, complexity, insight etc., that God wished that he would have known all this (he didn/t; the Great Books would have told us), and therefore couldn't have created such a exquisite universe?
religious people have no idea just how amazing our universe is. why settle for a primitive fairy tale when you see how mind blowing our actual universe is?
@ahmedshinwari depends on how you got to that conclusion. if you just pulled it out of your ass and called it a conclusion, then anyone could claim anything. but if you have research and study and actual verifiable evidence behind your conclusion, then it should hold up. why do you think science is so awesome? cause it actually fucking WORKS!
@ahmedshinwari so actually knowing about the world and actually being able to shape and control the world in any way we see fit is second class knowledge to things that people make up in their heads? i dont think so. if anything, philosophy is subordinate knowledge to science because you actually have to know whats going on in the world around you before you can make a philosophical judgement about it.
@ahmedshinwari my question to that is, what allowed einstein to even discover the fundemental forces in the world? the answer is science, you have to know what something is before you can form an opinion of it. thats what im saying. so to me, science comes before philosophy because you need to start with something before you can philophosize about it. science gives us that "something",
@TheMaggotdick look dude, its not my fault that you choose to believe in something that you have no good reason to believe. i stick with science because i know it works, i dont have to "pray" it works. if you get your feelings hurt because someone makes fun of your imaginary friend, you probably shouldnt have an imaginary friend in the first place. i could see if i was making fun of a disability or something, then i would be in the wrong. but, religion is clearly a joke, a bad one.
@mattakudesu Can you say for sure that religion is a bad joke, can you be 100% certain? Maybe you are, but is it justified?
Just like science, we can never be certain of anything.
Although there is no evidence, in favor or otherwise, of the existence of religion or god, it doesn't mean you can discredit it, although you can choose to.
What I'm saying is that you don't have to put religion and science together, you can't draw any conclusions. Not pissed or anything.
@TheMaggotdick i didnt really mean to sound rude, you seem like a reasonable guy. and really, i dont mind religion, i think its kind of cool (some of the mythology and shit) but only when the practictioners dont abandon reason and try to get their irrational and dangerous dogma inserted into world law. that is where i get pissed.
@mattakudesu you're saying that religious teachings are irrational and dangerous. christian teachings basically involve being kind, peaceful and loving to others and, in general, not screwing other people over. other religions usually follow the same values, such as buddhism, which involves doing good to others coexisting peacefully. it's not just that the mythology that can be cool, but also that the rules work well as social guidelines in many scenarios
You are a bit wrong....its how you interpret Christianity that makes you think it all about love, being kind and peaceful.....from another's man scope he can justify genocide, murder, retaliation etc. ( no need to remind you Noah story, Abraham story, Sodoma and Gomora story, an eye for eye etc).
science has no scope of interpretation thats the argument here.
@arthurbulan i think its primitive and ignorant when creationists say that the world is only 6 to 10 thousand years old despite the archives of evidence that say otherwise. i think its primitive and ignorant when creationists deny evolution even though we reap the benefits of evolution study (medicine and such) and we can even control it to a very small degree. how about this, would you consider it primitive and ignorant if i said that creationists have very little understanding about the world?
@mattakudesu I think we should collectively vote to evolve beyond letting religitards troll us around. The topics are about science, not religion. We need to start showing an example and simply tell them to fuck off, and then make efforts to stay on topic.
@a1mint wow okay, so you're calling any religious person a retard. that's not a prejudice generalisation at all. /sarcasm. but really, there are many people in the world who are religious and who love science and knowledge, and who truly enjoy the wonders of science that are explored in videos such as this
One cannot deny the beauty of our universe, whether it is deterministic or probabilistic, whether God created the whole thing or if it just appeared out of thin air, I DONT GIVE A CRAP.
Physics is amazing, no matter what you believe in. I would simply like to add that Albert Einstein, this great physicist who revolutionized our concept of space and time, is in fact deeply religious (not creationist I concur, but religious nonetheless).
@kotofu THAT IS NOT TRUE. Please at least research facts before you report them as such. Einstein did not believe in a personal god at all. He did believe in an abstract and impersonal god however. However, he often called himself an agnostic.
@mattakudesu My Physics teacher who has a PHD in astro-physics has decided to become a vicar and is going to Oxford University next year to study Religious Education. He knows his stuff when it comes to Physics!
@ismelloftoothpaste im sure he knows physics quite well. but not all scientists are atheist, most of them are, but not all. when it comes to religion, people have a tendency to put it in a special place in their brain, away from all logic and reasoning. they almost refuse to question it for fear of some supernatural consequences and/or loss of the comfort that it brings them. your teacher knows physics well, but he needs to work on logic.
@mattakudesu What are you talking about? My faith increases every single second when I study science as I am AWED by the working of this universe I am living in, Awed at God's effortless preservation of all of this I'm seeing, awed at his majesty.
With your approach, the Universe is a sad, cold, decrepit, devoid and dischanted place where my actions are meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
After studying Physics, I cannot hold that narrow world-view.
@muslimgiga You can call it sad all you want, but that's merely an emotional problem of yours. Why do you insist that there is "no meaning" just because nothing lasts forever? To me that is a very sad way of seeing things.
@hznfrst You obviously did not at all comprehend what I just said. Moral choice would be inconsequential in you universe. It is not an emotional argument. Science is not a set of beliefs, it is not morality or a lifestyle. It is consists of facts you interpret in you world view.
@muslimgiga Moral choice is *not* inconsequential during anyone's lifetime! And we get our morals from evolving in social groups where individuals had to care for each other, not from some spook in the sky.
@hznfrst if morals are gained through naturalistic means, that means that they exist only as a belief and/or a concept in our mind. it means that they have no meaning outside of how it affects what we do or say, and how we act. do you see how that description of morality is similar to the description that an athiest would give of the concept of a deity? if atheism is true, then what intrinsic value does morality have?
@daviatu This is an argument? You make a lot of assumptions in those few sentences, such as that "meaning" has some metaphysical importance and that atheism is something that can be described as true or false. Atheism is simply the conditional conclusion that the existence of deities is an incoherent concept with no supporting evidence and therefore not worth wasting much time on. "Morality" is a set of behaviors built into us because it has survival value.
@muslimgiga not at all, i marvel at the complexity and beauty of the world. i love the fact that things are never as normal as we think they are. i love the fact that we can actually learn about this universe by observing how it works and then controlling it to the point where we do things are pretty much natural magic. i see no god or jesus or jehova or yahweh or allah or vishnu or shiva or thor or any fake gods in this world except for in the stories of classic literature, just like the rest.
@mattakudesu People are scared of what they do not know and there are so many unknowns out there. Religion is comfort of the unknown, in a way. I respect religion at its core for at its core it teaches peace, love and respect for all things living. But I don't see that message being lived up to anymore. We need to be in perfect harmony/balance with nature through science. God = Nature = Evolution
@ghsty9 i completely agree with you. i think we humans should pour all of our resources into science and technology and merge with nature on a whole new level.
@mattakudesu you're implying that religious people can't love science. it doesn't make sense. i'm a christian, but i enjoy watching videos like these, and i love to learn more about the astounding complexities of the universe around us. i don't understand why you have to create this conflict where there is none
@raydredX I couldn't read it, but it looks like it might be representative of the one of the multiverse theories that says our universe is like a bubble floating around in a much bigger "bulk" & there are many other universe bubbles out there & the collision/fission of bubbles creates big bang events. A similar theory says that a universe is like a big membrane in the bulk floating very close to other universe "branes". Similar ideas, just different logistics.
@ALackOfLife General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are totally irreconcilable at the moment. How the theory of gravity formulated by Einstein can be described by quantum mechanics is probably the greatest question in physics.
Science has nothing to do with religion and it does not contradict it in any way unless you believe in the childish notion that there are written texts that contain the Literal word of god. Sadly millions do believe in this and it is so revolting that it causes otherwise intelligent people to completely dismiss all religious thought as irrational. Religion is all that involves the unknowable core of our being that cannot be pierced by reason. It makes some irrational, but it will never go away.
@tristbjorn Ant that's what I would like to see stop. I could never convince say “The Pope” of Hawkings' theories and The Pope will probably not get Hawking's to mass next Sunday. But does that make either less valuable in their own right. Both parties should stop wasting time and resources on the bickering and pursue their paths. Religion is a valuable part of our society and is of great value, likewise for the sciences. We can attest to that as we tap out our discussion here. Live and let live
@emptybookreader Exactly, but why fuss about it. All Religions are faith based. Rational is not required. Some say that religion is bad because of all the deaths over the years but Science ?? take a look at Hiroshima .. that wasn't religion. I'm saying let people believe as they wish. Scientist delve into matter, believers into spirit .. live and let live. Stop wasting resources arguing with those you can't change.
Not all scientists are bad and not all believers are stupid.
please send donations ! LOL ...neato man, but there are some falsehoods. The sun in not a reactor, this has been proven. A reactor cannot account for the temperature differences. Also, a reactor model cannot hold itself together in free space. Also, higgs boson has been predicted many,many times. Each time it fails to be where it was predicted. This REEKS of a failed theory.Then you run into matter blinking into and out of existance,entanglement, it all falls apart fairly quickly. Nice, but,meh
What I don't understand is why Science and Religion have to be at odds with each other. So many from each side post to these excellent videos as tho one side is right and the other wrong. I believe the two can live side by side and should, in support of each other. As I see it science studies "How" and religion explains "Why" . Science has never claimed to say why things happen only what happened and how. Seems to me we could all better spend time enjoying life than fussing about nothing.
@RDYS While religion doesn't have to conflict with science per se, then a literal view of a holy book written ages ago will, and the people who are indoctrinated to never doubt the holy book, will then be in a dilemma. Some digg deeper trenches and want the science corrupted or the society to accomodate their views. That's where the people, not wanting religions to influence such important areas, comeinto the debate.
@RDYS its still not rational to say god did it when i could say "pink fairies are responsible for why things work" and have equal validity compared to your claim. it doesn't matter if science and religion can coexist its just not a healthy thought process to think that religion or god can explain things with no supporting evidence. science admits we dont know. religion claims we do. so they do contradict in that way.
i don't believe in particles. how do you explain attraction with particles? by adding a negative sign to the momentum quantity in an equation? come on now.
i think we can explain the universe rationally with electromagnetic ropes. every atom in the universe is physically connected to every other atom, there is no other way to explain the pervasiveness of gravity or the properties of light. an atom then is a tiny cosmic knot with a coiled thread as the e-shell and a proton dandelion.
So, there are those three kinds of particles that like to lump together to form elements - protons, electrons, neutrons - and then there are those gazillions of other particles that are too cool - or fast, i.e. photons - for this bs and prefer to stay on their own, travelling the universe like lone wolves, eating canned food near the fire...
What is it about protons, electrons and neutrons that makes them all bff like? I mean, they can't be the only ones effected by strong nuclear, weak nuclear and electromagnetic force, can they?
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
@sandustanBrasov Whenever videos about science I notice an enormous amount of religious people explaning and justifying their beliefs trying to use the science that is being discussed. However, when I watch videos (and I do) about religion, theology, and faith I only see religious people talking with other religious people about theology and faith. Seems to me that people of faith feel the need to constantly justify themselves. Science collects, analyzes and reports. What do they need to defend?
@the81stviewer They need nothing to defend (theres nothing to defend in my opinion).sciences never needed "god or gods" and i never saw that science was in need of "faiths" - but i saw how "faiths" got revised (and sometimes dismantled) by sciences.faith's are dangerous things for human minds..they block instantly after beeing "contaminated" thinking and the progression of our species.
we found it in quran but after the science discovered it because we couldn't explain until we have this modern science but why don't study it and may be we found the answers we need
@BEmuslimBE scientific facts founded by scientists at those times.greek,egyptian and,at better times,arabic scholars etc. knowed that long times ago before this "science facts" (i would say:hear and say tales) find their ways into these books - and please dont interpret to much into vague or inaccurate formulated verses.but this was before many of them got hunted,slaughtered and beheaded by inquisitions,religious trials or forced to cease their great works..
..but i dont want to be respectless.believe what ever u want to believe..its your right.but its a simple equation: religion have no future..and if - then science will not.
@YorulmazIhsan Science will always have a future. It's religion that needs to be worried. Hopefully within a century, those dark-ages fairy tales will be done with.
@torrobinson bronze age gods and fairy tails actually.. the dark ages just used that shit to conquer and oppress... you will never get rid of religion as long as there are gullible people around who live scared anxious lives and fear the world or death even and as long as religion provides a stream of tax free wealth to the morons wielding it not to mention it provides a good excuse for war these days and a place for lots of paedophiles to hide and get protected.
islam always encourages people to get science and knowledge and prophet mohammad peace be upon him said its a way to paradise , un qurab we have clearly verses talking about black holes,bing bang , the expansion of the universe..... , and i am sure there are more verses we could't find the scientific fact which it told us about so we again will wait for the science to develop more and more
@the81stviewer why do you people feel such a need to go out of your way and say religion is stupid? I won't hate you for believing in nothing, let me have my something in peace.
@BrandonFound you would be right if it wasn't the exact opposite! it is always people of religion who wouldn't let other people(including people of other religions) have their beliefs in peace! Humanity would have been way more developed if it wasn't for religions' dogmas forced upon people over the history. 'stupid' is too innocent a description for religions. Religions can be evil sometimes. Science is the only "SAVIOR" of humanity ! Science is where we should invest !
@BrandonFound we R all particles. there4 the universe is god & god is energy & we are all part of that energy. religious idiots attempt 2 personify this energy & give it human traits like anger, jealousy love etc & lend it bias so that their version of god they r preaching is the right version. when we die our energy is never created nor is it destroyed the universe will take it back & in its own time our energy will become something else. we may B concious 2 it or we may not be who knows. do u
@the81stviewer Sagan,Shermer,Penn "Amazing" Randi, etc do alot of defending also. Ever heard of Skeptic Magazine?.......A whole lot of defending there too. They defend a closed minded position seeing ONLY WHAT THEY WANT TO SEE. The High Priests of "science" in this video have FAITH in the God particle and use it in thier calculations even it they HAVE NO PROOF OF IT'S EXISTENCE!!!! That makes science just another faith-religion.
@kdc43 The Higgs Boson or "God Particle" as you refer to it, is a predicted particle as are all the other particles in the Standard Model...this is the point that you clearly missedabout this video!! The elegance of The Standard Model is that it has been so absolutely accurate at predicting the existence of all the particles within it. The "faith" of scientists you refer to is better characterised as Confidence in the Predictions of The Standard Model. Good science is predictive science
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Unuverse let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you a truth seeker? Search for "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then click on "The Present" to open it. What it says will blow your mind.
jzs1501 2 hours ago
Not bad, but I object to your depiction of atoms as looking like little solar systems. We both know that is inaccurate and misleading, and I wish you'd change those electrons to the probability clouds that they are.
hznfrst 3 days ago
All of you shut the fuck up! How about an educational comment instead of religious fighting. It's on every fucking video!
STZK1127 3 days ago
@STZK1127 If you read those threads you will see that it is almost always the religious starting it. Go yell at them.
TheAnubisDrake 3 days ago
Well, quark my barge!
TheSoulDoubt 4 days ago
IT'S NAHT A TOOMAH
Yebisu22 1 week ago
There's only one particle: The graviton.
Stardrive explains EVERYTHING using only simple mechanics.
I state CERN hardly has a clue about the inner works of our universe, and I CHALLENGE THEM to debunk the unified theory STARDRIVE. I claim Stardrive is superior to Newtons, Einsteins and CERNs work!
If you think I'm boasting and you want to silence me, just debunk Stardrive =D
Nomasain 1 week ago
@Nomasain No one has to debunk it. You are claiming it exists. You need to demonstrate that it does.
St00sh13 1 week ago
@St00sh13 Believe it or not, but I've created perpetual motion by accident in 1982, proving my theory. However to demonstrate it on purpose I have to modify atom crystals...
So it's the other way around: CERN cannot prove their model; their theory is just a theory. Plus they are bogged down in the mud using incoherent and false assumptions, whilst Stardrive explains everything using simple mechanics.
It's not my problem if people focus on CERN instead of VEDODER.EU.
Nomasain 1 week ago
@Nomasain " ... I've created perpetual motion ... "
Okey dokey.
St00sh13 1 week ago
@St00sh13 Keep on thinking the world is as flat as a pancake. It's just a matter of time before I win you over.
Perpetual motion of the first kind means tapping power from the aether (dark matter if you will). It COMPLIES with the first law of thermodynamics. Einstein's SPACETIME DOES NOT COMPLY, since it turns energy into matter and vice versa. So who's the dokey now? (hint: rethorical =D).
Nomasain 1 week ago
I dunno.... I believe in science in all of its aspects but I do believe a higher power (i.e. God) created all of it..... kinda calming and beautiful really - it's like we're working our way closer to shaking His hand :)
aliofisher 1 week ago
@aliofisher It's one thing to believe a higher power exist, but it is another thing to believe religion...
FearIsSuicide 1 week ago
Where's the muzak off button?
ebutemetube 1 week ago
@drche420 why are you confused. the way that God designed this universe is amazing to me. i dont have to be feeble minded and call myself an athiest just because i study a science.
Tommybotham 2 weeks ago
:) Hello in your channel
Lion911199 2 weeks ago
@ 4:22 Holy Shit..!!!!
bhsolanki 2 weeks ago
images.4channel.org/f/src/589217_scale_of_universe_enhanced.swf"
bhsolanki 2 weeks ago
whats that tune in the background ?
snuseren 3 weeks ago
My gut tells me this is Mozart's music, can anyone verify?
GwinKingofNorway 3 weeks ago
@GwinKingofNorway Or possibly Haydn?
St00sh13 1 week ago
finally not the kuran
hegemoniuspiper 3 weeks ago
I disagree with the idea of different dimensions. I think the multiverse theory is what we will discover is fact.
This was an excellent video. Very nice models. XD
adamx20 3 weeks ago
S.Brasov has a point. I like his analysis.
Could it be that, where science is exposing so much detail, complexity, insight etc., that God wished that he would have known all this (he didn/t; the Great Books would have told us), and therefore couldn't have created such a exquisite universe?
pha003 3 weeks ago
religious people have no idea just how amazing our universe is. why settle for a primitive fairy tale when you see how mind blowing our actual universe is?
mattakudesu 4 weeks ago 85
@mattakudesu Because learning takes work, which religious people seem to suck at.
inconsp1cuous1515 3 weeks ago
@mattakudesu And, what if, arrive to the same conclusion?
ahmedshinwari 2 weeks ago
@ahmedshinwari depends on how you got to that conclusion. if you just pulled it out of your ass and called it a conclusion, then anyone could claim anything. but if you have research and study and actual verifiable evidence behind your conclusion, then it should hold up. why do you think science is so awesome? cause it actually fucking WORKS!
mattakudesu 2 weeks ago
@mattakudesu It is called philosophy, my friend. Science is subordinate knowledge to Philosophy.
ahmedshinwari 3 days ago
@ahmedshinwari so actually knowing about the world and actually being able to shape and control the world in any way we see fit is second class knowledge to things that people make up in their heads? i dont think so. if anything, philosophy is subordinate knowledge to science because you actually have to know whats going on in the world around you before you can make a philosophical judgement about it.
mattakudesu 3 days ago
@mattakudesu I said subordinate, not unnecessary.
What made Einstein to think that all of the fundamental forces can be a single force? Science or Philosophy?
ahmedshinwari 3 days ago
@ahmedshinwari my question to that is, what allowed einstein to even discover the fundemental forces in the world? the answer is science, you have to know what something is before you can form an opinion of it. thats what im saying. so to me, science comes before philosophy because you need to start with something before you can philophosize about it. science gives us that "something",
mattakudesu 3 days ago
@mattakudesu May be.
Besides, for philosophy, science is not the only 'something', it is one of many.
ahmedshinwari 3 days ago
@ahmedshinwari and on that point, i agree with you.
mattakudesu 2 days ago
@mattakudesu You just had to bring religion into this didnt you
MrSteamteam 2 weeks ago
@MrSteamteam it was bound to happen.
mattakudesu 2 weeks ago
@mattakudesu I believe in God and I study Physics at University - mad?
Tommybotham 2 weeks ago
@Tommybotham
Mad? Nah. Confused? Yep.
drche420 2 weeks ago
@mattakudesu Why be an asshole to people who believe differently than you do? -_-
TherinAndHisBongos 2 weeks ago
@TherinAndHisBongos its not that im being an asshole, im just separating fact from fiction.
mattakudesu 1 week ago
@mattakudesu i know right
ege1993 2 weeks ago
@mattakudesu stop bringing up religion and science together. i'm a research scientist and i go to church every sunday.
TheMaggotdick 2 weeks ago
@TheMaggotdick look dude, its not my fault that you choose to believe in something that you have no good reason to believe. i stick with science because i know it works, i dont have to "pray" it works. if you get your feelings hurt because someone makes fun of your imaginary friend, you probably shouldnt have an imaginary friend in the first place. i could see if i was making fun of a disability or something, then i would be in the wrong. but, religion is clearly a joke, a bad one.
mattakudesu 2 weeks ago 29
@mattakudesu Can you say for sure that religion is a bad joke, can you be 100% certain? Maybe you are, but is it justified?
Just like science, we can never be certain of anything.
Although there is no evidence, in favor or otherwise, of the existence of religion or god, it doesn't mean you can discredit it, although you can choose to.
What I'm saying is that you don't have to put religion and science together, you can't draw any conclusions. Not pissed or anything.
TheMaggotdick 2 weeks ago
@TheMaggotdick i didnt really mean to sound rude, you seem like a reasonable guy. and really, i dont mind religion, i think its kind of cool (some of the mythology and shit) but only when the practictioners dont abandon reason and try to get their irrational and dangerous dogma inserted into world law. that is where i get pissed.
mattakudesu 1 week ago
@mattakudesu you're saying that religious teachings are irrational and dangerous. christian teachings basically involve being kind, peaceful and loving to others and, in general, not screwing other people over. other religions usually follow the same values, such as buddhism, which involves doing good to others coexisting peacefully. it's not just that the mythology that can be cool, but also that the rules work well as social guidelines in many scenarios
daviatu 13 hours ago
@daviatu
You are a bit wrong....its how you interpret Christianity that makes you think it all about love, being kind and peaceful.....from another's man scope he can justify genocide, murder, retaliation etc. ( no need to remind you Noah story, Abraham story, Sodoma and Gomora story, an eye for eye etc).
science has no scope of interpretation thats the argument here.
Drsorab 6 hours ago
@TheMaggotdick Who cares?
RichtoffenRoach 1 week ago
@RichtoffenRoach i care =) ahaha i don't know why I said that. stop being pathetic and say something worth reading
exposer1997 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@exposer1997 "Stop being pathetic and say something worth reading." Apply it, stranger :))
RichtoffenRoach 1 week ago
@mattakudesu It is quite primitive and ignorant of you to say that creationists have no understanding of our marvelous universe
arthurbulan 1 week ago
@arthurbulan i think its primitive and ignorant when creationists say that the world is only 6 to 10 thousand years old despite the archives of evidence that say otherwise. i think its primitive and ignorant when creationists deny evolution even though we reap the benefits of evolution study (medicine and such) and we can even control it to a very small degree. how about this, would you consider it primitive and ignorant if i said that creationists have very little understanding about the world?
mattakudesu 1 week ago
@mattakudesu I think we should collectively vote to evolve beyond letting religitards troll us around. The topics are about science, not religion. We need to start showing an example and simply tell them to fuck off, and then make efforts to stay on topic.
a1mint 1 week ago 2
@a1mint wow okay, so you're calling any religious person a retard. that's not a prejudice generalisation at all. /sarcasm. but really, there are many people in the world who are religious and who love science and knowledge, and who truly enjoy the wonders of science that are explored in videos such as this
daviatu 13 hours ago
@arthurbulan Wow, that's clearly a contradiction. Creationists and "understanding of universe" don't go together in one sentence.
Orbitusx 1 week ago
One cannot deny the beauty of our universe, whether it is deterministic or probabilistic, whether God created the whole thing or if it just appeared out of thin air, I DONT GIVE A CRAP.
Physics is amazing, no matter what you believe in. I would simply like to add that Albert Einstein, this great physicist who revolutionized our concept of space and time, is in fact deeply religious (not creationist I concur, but religious nonetheless).
PEACE
kotofu 1 week ago
@kotofu i completely agree with you.
mattakudesu 1 week ago
@kotofu THAT IS NOT TRUE. Please at least research facts before you report them as such. Einstein did not believe in a personal god at all. He did believe in an abstract and impersonal god however. However, he often called himself an agnostic.
Hinduspy 1 week ago
@mattakudesu My Physics teacher who has a PHD in astro-physics has decided to become a vicar and is going to Oxford University next year to study Religious Education. He knows his stuff when it comes to Physics!
ismelloftoothpaste 6 days ago
@ismelloftoothpaste im sure he knows physics quite well. but not all scientists are atheist, most of them are, but not all. when it comes to religion, people have a tendency to put it in a special place in their brain, away from all logic and reasoning. they almost refuse to question it for fear of some supernatural consequences and/or loss of the comfort that it brings them. your teacher knows physics well, but he needs to work on logic.
mattakudesu 6 days ago
@mattakudesu What are you talking about? My faith increases every single second when I study science as I am AWED by the working of this universe I am living in, Awed at God's effortless preservation of all of this I'm seeing, awed at his majesty.
With your approach, the Universe is a sad, cold, decrepit, devoid and dischanted place where my actions are meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
After studying Physics, I cannot hold that narrow world-view.
muslimgiga 3 days ago
@muslimgiga You can call it sad all you want, but that's merely an emotional problem of yours. Why do you insist that there is "no meaning" just because nothing lasts forever? To me that is a very sad way of seeing things.
hznfrst 3 days ago
@hznfrst You obviously did not at all comprehend what I just said. Moral choice would be inconsequential in you universe. It is not an emotional argument. Science is not a set of beliefs, it is not morality or a lifestyle. It is consists of facts you interpret in you world view.
muslimgiga 3 days ago
@muslimgiga Moral choice is *not* inconsequential during anyone's lifetime! And we get our morals from evolving in social groups where individuals had to care for each other, not from some spook in the sky.
hznfrst 3 days ago
@hznfrst if morals are gained through naturalistic means, that means that they exist only as a belief and/or a concept in our mind. it means that they have no meaning outside of how it affects what we do or say, and how we act. do you see how that description of morality is similar to the description that an athiest would give of the concept of a deity? if atheism is true, then what intrinsic value does morality have?
daviatu 13 hours ago
@daviatu This is an argument? You make a lot of assumptions in those few sentences, such as that "meaning" has some metaphysical importance and that atheism is something that can be described as true or false. Atheism is simply the conditional conclusion that the existence of deities is an incoherent concept with no supporting evidence and therefore not worth wasting much time on. "Morality" is a set of behaviors built into us because it has survival value.
hznfrst 4 hours ago
@muslimgiga not at all, i marvel at the complexity and beauty of the world. i love the fact that things are never as normal as we think they are. i love the fact that we can actually learn about this universe by observing how it works and then controlling it to the point where we do things are pretty much natural magic. i see no god or jesus or jehova or yahweh or allah or vishnu or shiva or thor or any fake gods in this world except for in the stories of classic literature, just like the rest.
mattakudesu 3 days ago
Comment removed
ghsty9 1 day ago
Comment removed
ghsty9 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mattakudesu People are scared of what they do not know and there are so many unknowns out there. Religion is comfort of the unknown, in a way. I respect religion at its core for at its core it teaches peace, love and respect for all things living. But I don't see that message being lived up to anymore. We need to be in perfect harmony/balance with nature through science. God = Nature = Evolution
ghsty9 1 day ago
@ghsty9 i completely agree with you. i think we humans should pour all of our resources into science and technology and merge with nature on a whole new level.
mattakudesu 1 day ago
@mattakudesu Satan has decieved you brother I will pray for you tonight.
God speed.
/not
CamNM1991 14 hours ago
@mattakudesu you're implying that religious people can't love science. it doesn't make sense. i'm a christian, but i enjoy watching videos like these, and i love to learn more about the astounding complexities of the universe around us. i don't understand why you have to create this conflict where there is none
daviatu 13 hours ago
notice the lack of gravity. when we find out how that works we're fucked
leothelion634 1 month ago
Can anyone tell me what are the many colored balls at the right-top corner at 4:24 please?
raydredX 1 month ago
@raydredX I couldn't read it, but it looks like it might be representative of the one of the multiverse theories that says our universe is like a bubble floating around in a much bigger "bulk" & there are many other universe bubbles out there & the collision/fission of bubbles creates big bang events. A similar theory says that a universe is like a big membrane in the bulk floating very close to other universe "branes". Similar ideas, just different logistics.
ScienceofWinning 1 month ago
@ScienceofWinning Thanks for solving the last one.
raydredX 1 month ago
rubbish like omar
goodmmann123 1 month ago
Your primary tube channel is very large don't you think
roofrepairhq 1 month ago
Your own videos help make earth superior spot .
hatfieldlainall 1 month ago
One Atom is one universe. QUANTITY of universes is QUANTITY of atoms in one
universe!
Dark matter from black holes making field behind mass of universe = electron
- this power prevent connect universe with the others universes. (to connect
univesrses you need biger power (temp and pressure) than pressure produce
black holes)
sciencist examind pixel or enviroment, in mathematical simulation, and see
in pixel enviroment or enviroment look like pixel
mirrco1 1 month ago
I am not sure if you ever however your site is fantastic .
TurboBusinessPro 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your new work is actually enthusiasm for me .
OlleFayettev38 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How much time would it decide to modify video such as you are doing
acswaterproofing 1 month ago
How much time would it decide to modify video such as you are doing
acswaterproofing 1 month ago
What about gravity?
ALackOfLife 1 month ago
@ALackOfLife General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are totally irreconcilable at the moment. How the theory of gravity formulated by Einstein can be described by quantum mechanics is probably the greatest question in physics.
stupidmonkey246 1 month ago
Science has nothing to do with religion and it does not contradict it in any way unless you believe in the childish notion that there are written texts that contain the Literal word of god. Sadly millions do believe in this and it is so revolting that it causes otherwise intelligent people to completely dismiss all religious thought as irrational. Religion is all that involves the unknowable core of our being that cannot be pierced by reason. It makes some irrational, but it will never go away.
version191 1 month ago
Advantageous video
howmuchforroof 1 month ago
Your entire sound is so great :d
Kirakonea 1 month ago
This is extremely strange but I personally enjoy your current yt channel ...
Kirakonea 1 month ago
@tristbjorn Ant that's what I would like to see stop. I could never convince say “The Pope” of Hawkings' theories and The Pope will probably not get Hawking's to mass next Sunday. But does that make either less valuable in their own right. Both parties should stop wasting time and resources on the bickering and pursue their paths. Religion is a valuable part of our society and is of great value, likewise for the sciences. We can attest to that as we tap out our discussion here. Live and let live
RDYS 1 month ago
@emptybookreader Exactly, but why fuss about it. All Religions are faith based. Rational is not required. Some say that religion is bad because of all the deaths over the years but Science ?? take a look at Hiroshima .. that wasn't religion. I'm saying let people believe as they wish. Scientist delve into matter, believers into spirit .. live and let live. Stop wasting resources arguing with those you can't change.
Not all scientists are bad and not all believers are stupid.
RDYS 1 month ago
Really are your new film croping and editing or you edit alone
nutridopolska 1 month ago
please send donations ! LOL ...neato man, but there are some falsehoods. The sun in not a reactor, this has been proven. A reactor cannot account for the temperature differences. Also, a reactor model cannot hold itself together in free space. Also, higgs boson has been predicted many,many times. Each time it fails to be where it was predicted. This REEKS of a failed theory.Then you run into matter blinking into and out of existance,entanglement, it all falls apart fairly quickly. Nice, but,meh
nodice4me 1 month ago
What I don't understand is why Science and Religion have to be at odds with each other. So many from each side post to these excellent videos as tho one side is right and the other wrong. I believe the two can live side by side and should, in support of each other. As I see it science studies "How" and religion explains "Why" . Science has never claimed to say why things happen only what happened and how. Seems to me we could all better spend time enjoying life than fussing about nothing.
RDYS 1 month ago
@RDYS Thank you for coming out and saying this! Its something ive been trying to get thru to people for a while now.
zestydude87 1 month ago
@RDYS While religion doesn't have to conflict with science per se, then a literal view of a holy book written ages ago will, and the people who are indoctrinated to never doubt the holy book, will then be in a dilemma. Some digg deeper trenches and want the science corrupted or the society to accomodate their views. That's where the people, not wanting religions to influence such important areas, comeinto the debate.
tristbjorn 1 month ago
@RDYS its still not rational to say god did it when i could say "pink fairies are responsible for why things work" and have equal validity compared to your claim. it doesn't matter if science and religion can coexist its just not a healthy thought process to think that religion or god can explain things with no supporting evidence. science admits we dont know. religion claims we do. so they do contradict in that way.
emptybookreader 1 month ago
FINE JOB KEEP LOOKING.
GIANFRANCO FRONZI. JAN.18/ 12
9493760 1 month ago
CERN does amazing job nowadays... Timer from Gdans is good example. Keep up great work!
Brittanionf529 1 month ago
why is there always some classical music in the background of these videos? u never see metal or rap or something like that in the background. :)
igorkra11 1 month ago
@igorkra11 do a video see how it works out..
YooTubeCritc 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why do people call the higgs bosen the God particle?
truthseeker010101 1 month ago
@Bestofscience (lol) Preons is actually spelt: Prions
MuziKFreak009 1 month ago
Mantap!!, Gw suka ini video. Thanks for shared
Spasatcom 2 months ago
For love of Christ! How can this receive the dislike votes? Are these people retarded?
robertoppenheimer 2 months ago in playlist Standard Model of Particle Physics
@robertoppenheimer Man, you're right! This video is awesome! Can't wait till they find the higgs boson.
I want to fly on my rug. The sooner the better.
clapton79 1 month ago
Good Video!! Very-Very Infomative. Thanks
directorygod 2 months ago
Comment removed
Spasatcom 2 months ago
Cool Video!! Thanks..
ngeliatduit 2 months ago 4
Where does the graviton fit into all this? How does the graviton fit into Einstein's theory that gravity is caused by the warping of space-time?
BJ219 2 months ago
The best video ever seen talking bout this model
Thanks guys
o0professional0o 2 months ago
Why doesn't the Standard Model include Gravity?
gwendance 2 months ago
@gwendance
Because gravity is one of the four forces that act within the confines of physical reality.
If the goal of the standard model is to acuratly depict the physical reality, gravity has to be a part of it.
smackbabie 2 months ago
i don't believe in particles. how do you explain attraction with particles? by adding a negative sign to the momentum quantity in an equation? come on now.
i think we can explain the universe rationally with electromagnetic ropes. every atom in the universe is physically connected to every other atom, there is no other way to explain the pervasiveness of gravity or the properties of light. an atom then is a tiny cosmic knot with a coiled thread as the e-shell and a proton dandelion.
junior00bacon00chee 2 months ago
Oh... Oh! Holy sh*t, now I get it.
So, there are those three kinds of particles that like to lump together to form elements - protons, electrons, neutrons - and then there are those gazillions of other particles that are too cool - or fast, i.e. photons - for this bs and prefer to stay on their own, travelling the universe like lone wolves, eating canned food near the fire...
Is it kind of like that?
janeyanna 2 months ago
What is it about protons, electrons and neutrons that makes them all bff like? I mean, they can't be the only ones effected by strong nuclear, weak nuclear and electromagnetic force, can they?
*scratches head*
janeyanna 2 months ago
Okay, ignore this last question :D I should've waited with my little outburst of wonder till the end of the video.
*sigh* I love physics.
janeyanna 2 months ago
@janeyanna I really love your take on particle physics.
Fuglebolle 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
@sandustanBrasov Whenever videos about science I notice an enormous amount of religious people explaning and justifying their beliefs trying to use the science that is being discussed. However, when I watch videos (and I do) about religion, theology, and faith I only see religious people talking with other religious people about theology and faith. Seems to me that people of faith feel the need to constantly justify themselves. Science collects, analyzes and reports. What do they need to defend?
the81stviewer 2 months ago 86
@the81stviewer They need nothing to defend (theres nothing to defend in my opinion).sciences never needed "god or gods" and i never saw that science was in need of "faiths" - but i saw how "faiths" got revised (and sometimes dismantled) by sciences.faith's are dangerous things for human minds..they block instantly after beeing "contaminated" thinking and the progression of our species.
YorulmazIhsan 2 months ago
@YorulmazIhsan
you are wrong, so many scientific facts
we found it in quran but after the science discovered it because we couldn't explain until we have this modern science but why don't study it and may be we found the answers we need
BEmuslimBE 2 months ago
@BEmuslimBE scientific facts founded by scientists at those times.greek,egyptian and,at better times,arabic scholars etc. knowed that long times ago before this "science facts" (i would say:hear and say tales) find their ways into these books - and please dont interpret to much into vague or inaccurate formulated verses.but this was before many of them got hunted,slaughtered and beheaded by inquisitions,religious trials or forced to cease their great works..
YorulmazIhsan 2 months ago
..but i dont want to be respectless.believe what ever u want to believe..its your right.but its a simple equation: religion have no future..and if - then science will not.
YorulmazIhsan 2 months ago
@YorulmazIhsan Science will always have a future. It's religion that needs to be worried. Hopefully within a century, those dark-ages fairy tales will be done with.
torrobinson 2 months ago
@torrobinson bronze age gods and fairy tails actually.. the dark ages just used that shit to conquer and oppress... you will never get rid of religion as long as there are gullible people around who live scared anxious lives and fear the world or death even and as long as religion provides a stream of tax free wealth to the morons wielding it not to mention it provides a good excuse for war these days and a place for lots of paedophiles to hide and get protected.
YooTubeCritc 1 month ago
@YorulmazIhsan what does religion do for us?
20ZZ20 1 month ago
@YorulmazIhsan
islam always encourages people to get science and knowledge and prophet mohammad peace be upon him said its a way to paradise , un qurab we have clearly verses talking about black holes,bing bang , the expansion of the universe..... , and i am sure there are more verses we could't find the scientific fact which it told us about so we again will wait for the science to develop more and more
BEmuslimBE 2 months ago
@BEmuslimBE did it also mention schizophrenia and delusions? how about gullibility and anxiety? Maybe religious books tend to dodge those topics?
YooTubeCritc 1 month ago
@the81stviewer why do you people feel such a need to go out of your way and say religion is stupid? I won't hate you for believing in nothing, let me have my something in peace.
BrandonFound 1 month ago
@BrandonFound you would be right if it wasn't the exact opposite! it is always people of religion who wouldn't let other people(including people of other religions) have their beliefs in peace! Humanity would have been way more developed if it wasn't for religions' dogmas forced upon people over the history. 'stupid' is too innocent a description for religions. Religions can be evil sometimes. Science is the only "SAVIOR" of humanity ! Science is where we should invest !
relhage100 1 month ago
@relhage100 money and religion.. the two biggest murderers on this planet
YooTubeCritc 1 month ago
@BrandonFound we R all particles. there4 the universe is god & god is energy & we are all part of that energy. religious idiots attempt 2 personify this energy & give it human traits like anger, jealousy love etc & lend it bias so that their version of god they r preaching is the right version. when we die our energy is never created nor is it destroyed the universe will take it back & in its own time our energy will become something else. we may B concious 2 it or we may not be who knows. do u
YooTubeCritc 1 month ago
@the81stviewer Sagan,Shermer,Penn "Amazing" Randi, etc do alot of defending also. Ever heard of Skeptic Magazine?.......A whole lot of defending there too. They defend a closed minded position seeing ONLY WHAT THEY WANT TO SEE. The High Priests of "science" in this video have FAITH in the God particle and use it in thier calculations even it they HAVE NO PROOF OF IT'S EXISTENCE!!!! That makes science just another faith-religion.
kdc43 2 weeks ago
@kdc43 The Higgs Boson or "God Particle" as you refer to it, is a predicted particle as are all the other particles in the Standard Model...this is the point that you clearly missedabout this video!! The elegance of The Standard Model is that it has been so absolutely accurate at predicting the existence of all the particles within it. The "faith" of scientists you refer to is better characterised as Confidence in the Predictions of The Standard Model. Good science is predictive science
TheCaptCol 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Unuverse let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am on the odd a part of Youtube once more.
dallasrichar26 2 months ago
This is so fascinating.
CaptainShmiggles 2 months ago