Like they say, "Any landing you can walk away from is a good one!" lol $22 million USD. The Cessna Citation X is a long-range medium business jet aircraft.
The ones recorded this video ,as can be guessed from their comments(eg 'i think he made it'),were expecting some one to land in such a way?
1was it a test to land in that condition(downwind,wet runway.etc) and the ones recorded this video were among the organizers of that test.2was the plane undercontrol of unskilled ones(young or kids as they do with their parent cars,hijackers.etc)who could'nt follow/disobeying normal landing procedures/instructions(engines)and were been followed by officials
The pilot made some very bad decisions... a tailwind landing on a runway which some claim didn't meet minimums for his equipment is the biggie. Failing to shut off electrical and fuel upon ditching the other. I can't see how the engine would restart unless both these conditions were on.
very expensive Jet Ski. The passengers and crew very lucky to be alive, however, hitting water is just like hitting the ground. Nosing in would have killed them all.
I stopped flying a few years back but always thought that pilots who get jobs flying business jets are really really good at thier chosen carreer. The fact that this asshat broke soo many basic rules of flying is absolutely ridiculous. One of the things you learn very early on in your flying career is how to go through your shutdown drills in the event of a flight failure.
I am gobsmacked at how many failures in proceedure this pilot managed to accomplish.
So my question is; Since he made so many mistakes i.e.: Landing at a "no jet" airport, landing in tailwind, landing 2/3rd's short on runway, not reporting his position, etc. Did the insurance co. pay for loss/damage of plane & passengers? And did his pilot's license get revoked?
............and he was Waaaaaayyyyyy to fast over the numbers. shit, looked like about 140 kts, maybe a bit more. what was this idiot thinking? he should have been configured, and MUCH slower. wow..........amazes me the guys who can get a Jet Rating and be behind the controls of one of these machines. they're all lucky to be alive.
The runway was wet, he landed directly into a 10 knot tailwind, the runway wasn't rated for jet aircraft anyway, The NTSB report showed throttle at 20% thrust setting after they fished the aircraft out of the bay. He overflew the airfield at 100 feet AGL. He landed about 2/3rd down the runway, this was just recipe for crash. WHERE DID THEY FIND THIS GUY?
Jets need to be two pilot crews, all of them. If for no other reason than to disagree with the captain on a decision like this. What an idiot. At least he lost his ticket.
My take is that the pilot(s) tried to salvage the engines because once in contact with salt water, they are lost. So since they knew the insurance will not cover for the accident, they thought they could at least save what's most valuable in the wreckage...
It's hard to believe this guy was a real pilot. He made no position reports on UNICOM though there was a 182 in the pattern for the opposite runway. He overflew the field at 100 feet AGL!!! he turned right to fly the pattern for 11 at 200 to 300 feet AGL!!! Landed 2/3's of the way down the runway in a tailwind when there was not enough room even if he hit the numbers!! It's as if someone's 15 year old kid stole a citation after flying one in MS flight simulator!
@kingneptune117 I lol @ u man...just cause the market is tough nowadays, it doesn't mean u won't get a job when ur done with ur atpl...cause I know this is what its all about:P and how the hell is that guy a charter pilot?..
I am not a jet pilot but I actually jest read in flying magazine today about the problem with go arounds in jets. Espically in a situation like this. They could have possibly not had enough runway or clear space ahead for a successfull go around. In that case, they would have plowed into that river at a much faster speed then if they just hit the breaks as fast as they could. Though I'm not claiming to know for sure. 1st time I saw this I wondered the same thing. But that article made sense
If the pilot had secured the aircraft as he is supposed to do, he would have shut off the electricity and fuel supplies before getting out, - for exactly this reason. It also helps reduce the chance of an after-crash fire and when people are being evacuated. Most firefighters become less effective rescuing people from a downed aircraft when there's a screaming jet engine scaring the hell out of them. This pilot should have lost his license and been prosecuted no matter what country he's from.
The worst thing is that the Danish CEO didn't admit his foul flying skills but tried to blame the brakes. The Press had a field day because two passengers were young women... My guess was too is that he was showing off
The pilot didn't leave engines running. Water shorted the elec. system, & engaged the starter. All the engine needed then was something to ignite the fuel & there you go - a running jet engine.
According to NTSB, the plane needed more runway than was avail. - PLUS he landed 1000 ft long - PLUS he landed with a 10-15 kt tailwind - PLUS he landed @ an airport that specifically forbade jets to land, which was stated on the chart in his cockpit. He might have made it in the opposite direction.
Im not questioning your point about the water engaging the starter - however shouldnt it have short curcuited the system or something, and stopped it from working completely? Im not doubting you im just curious - cheers
I'm not certain of all the details, but the NTSB determined that water in the circuitry caused the malfunction that started the engine. I don't know exactly where to read the NTSB report, but it should be easy to find on the web.
Another interesting thing about this accident is that the pilot circled the airport before landing, so he got a view of the windsock before attempting his downwind landing. In the NTSB report, he blamed failed brakes, but it would have made no difference.
@PilotMusician But what i'd like to know is how the engine got fuel. As you probably know, the starters in a CJ only spin the fans to pull air into the engine. The fuel doesn't reach the engine until the N2 percentage reaches a certain point and the pilot pushes the throttles out of the "Cutoff" position into the "Idle" position. Maybe the crash wrecked the valve, allowing fuel to rush in?
@E240JA Well, all of this is supposition, but I doubt the throttles were in cutoff position. My guess is that the engines flamed out from the initial splash-in, and with the engines off, the pilot then concentrated on getting the passengers off the plane safely, without going through the shutdown (since the engines were already "shut down"). Again, just a guess.
i think the pilot is trying to use all the fuel so it will not float into the water and kill alot of life. and when a plane is emty for fuel its like a bomb without the explosive. anyway can any of u guys see the wings??
first of all, the pilot was going way too fast. second, he should've been landing on the other side of the runway. pilots need to learn to do things better, especially this one.
I couldn't agree more. But there is one thing disagree with here about the landing. He should not have landed at this airport in the first place. I just read in an article online that this airport is not designed to handle jets. The runway was far too short for this fast-moving plane. What the hell were those pilots thinking anyway? I don't understand why they didn't divert to another airport.
situations dictate... could have been a possible emergency landing, could have had other nearby runways closed due to weather, or could have had some insistent ritsy prick of a passenger that insisted on landing at this airport. I don't know, but I'm sure him being a pilot, he knew the potential risks before he even approached the runway. Something tells me there's more to this than a simple pilot error. I agree with everything you're saying tho, but there are alot of "what if's" here.
completely right there. what the hell was he thinking??? how do these guys get licences and then do something fundementally stupid like that?? utter madness and i hope he doesn't fly anymore
What the hell was the pilot trying to prove by driving around in the water? Did he think he could takeoff with the plane halfway in the water? No wonder he ended up in the lake.
The cut off shorted out. The funniest part of this video is that the girls on the plane are topless. Apparently this guy and his buddy would give girls rides but they had to be topless. I'm not sure if you can see it from the video or not.
why blame the pilot,u assholes if u slowed down it would be a hard landing which might have caused huge chaos!!the runaway is too short and planes land at different speeds,do u expect to land a mig29 on this runaway?
Hey Ding Dong, it is NOT the Atlanta Bay. It is actually called the "Inside Thorofare" and is the waterway between the Bader Field (now closed) airport and Atlantic City, NJ. If you look you will see the Atlantic City Casinos in the background. The accident was caused by the pilot attempting to land on a runway that was not long enough for his Jet. Strange thing is a few miles away is a much larger airport that he could have landed on safely.
Actually, he was landing downwind as sed in the vid, but i'm not sure about runway length. But the fact that he was way too fast, due to attpemting to land downwind was a major factor
The runway was WAY too short for any jet to land. The runway was only 2900 feet long, about 500 feet shorter than the MINIMUM length for a Cessna Citation X (what the jet was). The runway was designed for commuter traffic (prop planes) and for sea planes. The airport has since been closed, but it does have a lot of history.
Still, count that for TWO big mistakes on part of the pilot. Landing on a strip too short AND downwind. He'd have had a much better chance flying into the wind.
Amazing, you know how to read wikipedia. Good job. 3400 feet is not the MINIMUM distance required for landing. 3400 is for a given weight, and does not take tail/head wind into account. Point is, you don't help your chances of successfully landing on a short strip by flying WITH the wind.
What? Schmuck, was my local air strip and I knew about this the day it happened. Now the real point is DON'T LAND A JET AT AN AIRPORT THAT IS CLOSED TO JET TRAFFIC! This accident is 100% due to multiple errors on the part of the pilot.
The pilot was a dick .... at 1:45 onwards the narrator clearly shows the wind speed & direction.. The pilot was landing with a severe TAIL wind.. & NOT into wind as he should. what an ass!
The fact of the matter is, he chose to land on a runway already too short, with a tail wind which meant he made a potentially fatal decision right there. His incompetence was further amplified by his touching down 1/3 of the way down the runway. He gave himself only 1900 ft of stopping distance as opposed to the 3500+ feet that was necessary for a safe landing. Thats a quarter-mile difference. Finally, he is VERY LUCKY that the engine that relit did not explode, as it very well could have.
I was told it was some sort of auto-restart circuit. It may also have been an electrical short, as water may have flooded the Avionics compartment, depending on where this is located in the CitJet.
I personally, am surprised the engine actually caught on. Good selling point for the engine manufacturer... "100% starting guarantee, even when half-drowned!!!!"
Typically on the Citation series, the Ignitions are supposed to be turned on for landing as well as Fuel Pumps, and odds are that the pilot did not place the engines in the cut-off position once getting out.
Isn't this Bader Field, Atlantic City, NJ? I've landed their in some prop jobs. Its pretty short. All it takes to get behind the wheel of a jet is a whole lota money. Not skill, talent, or expierence. As a flight instructor we have a saying, "Whats the most dangerous thing in the air?"..."A doctor in a Bonanza!" I've flown with some of the richest, exec's, business leaders and owners, and even though they are great money makers, their flying skills suck and they think they are the shit.
The pilot attempted to land on a wet 2 948 foot runway at an airport which usually does not accept jets with a 10-knot tailwind. But the airplane would require 3 500 feet with that tailwind.
what an idiot. Not only did he run his jet into the river, he tried to GET IT OUT BY USING THE ENGINE. Yea dumbass... thats why theres something called a boat, you know... made for water.
Ok, the Runway was CLOSED TO JET A/C 525A rego OY-JET did a fly by, landed down wind, (2948 ft) the posted weight for 11,400 lb ac (which this was ) with a 10 mph tail wind was 3570 ft. The Closed to Jet traffic notice was TAPED on the Control collum, NTSB report states "PIC imporoper decision to plan a flt to a runway of insuff length. 2 imp inflt decision to land on that runway with a tail wind, failure to obtain proper touch down point. The RW being wet was No factor INJ 1 minor, 3 uninj"
thats a waste
pachodomi 1 day ago in playlist Aviación
WHAT THE HELL WENT WRONG ?
Skybolter 2 weeks ago
why the hell was he trying to land there if it was a closed runway and never open to jets in the first place?
foso130 1 month ago
Boat / Airplane with 2 high thrust engines!! :)
schildgen1 2 months ago
Comment removed
schildgen1 2 months ago
plane taking a swim
TheNinjaRichie 3 months ago
This is the world's slowest Sea-Doo.
joeyandsimon1 3 months ago
Cessna Citation Amphibian?
Marcus666Sund 4 months ago
And that's how you go from pilot to a mc donalds server :D
eamador83 5 months ago
Considering the findings of NTSB, the guy should be jailed.
crockett616 7 months ago
Nice commentary man.
nazo360 7 months ago
jetboat ?
kreepark1 7 months ago
7:22 if its not obvious - hmmmmmmmmm......
murderblade7 8 months ago
That engine restart was wild!! A real oh crap moment.
pixamite1 8 months ago
Like they say, "Any landing you can walk away from is a good one!" lol $22 million USD. The Cessna Citation X is a long-range medium business jet aircraft.
shroomduke 8 months ago
Like they say, "Any landing you can walk away from is a good one!" lol
shroomduke 8 months ago
That is one crazy son bitch!
rube740 10 months ago
Its too fast
p0lice999 10 months ago
He did not cut fuel what a moron thats first day rookie crap. dont care how panic you get follow safety rules or its all for not.
akula5151 10 months ago
The ones recorded this video ,as can be guessed from their comments(eg 'i think he made it'),were expecting some one to land in such a way?
1was it a test to land in that condition(downwind,wet runway.etc) and the ones recorded this video were among the organizers of that test.2was the plane undercontrol of unskilled ones(young or kids as they do with their parent cars,hijackers.etc)who could'nt follow/disobeying normal landing procedures/instructions(engines)and were been followed by officials
sdbuffer 10 months ago
2-was the plane undercontrol of unskilled ones(young or
kids as they do with their parent cars,hijackers.etc)who
could not follow and/or disobeying normal/safety landing
procedures/instructions(note:the engine running) and was
been followed by officials?
sdbuffer 10 months ago
Comment removed
sdbuffer 10 months ago
The pilot made some very bad decisions... a tailwind landing on a runway which some claim didn't meet minimums for his equipment is the biggie. Failing to shut off electrical and fuel upon ditching the other. I can't see how the engine would restart unless both these conditions were on.
kewlmynd99 10 months ago
5:18 is there sombody in there doing that? LOL fail...........
dominicwastaken 11 months ago
Wait....What? 0.o
bkm72 11 months ago
perfectly good equipment destroyed by a bad choice and negligence...
senikle 11 months ago
very expensive Jet Ski. The passengers and crew very lucky to be alive, however, hitting water is just like hitting the ground. Nosing in would have killed them all.
MNBluestater 1 year ago
very expensive Jet Ski
MNBluestater 1 year ago
Wtf! is that a jet in the water comeing towards are house...yes yes it is.
johnplayersstandard 1 year ago
Is their anybody in there doing that??? Lmao wtf?
johnplayersstandard 1 year ago
"maybe it'll taxi back on land we don't know." Hilarious
MrElfro89 1 year ago
The citation is a TRANSFORMER !!! lol
yahul25 1 year ago
Great engines though,,, to start and run in the water like that...amazing.
highvelocity123 1 year ago
nose gear wasnt locked and down
TeenFlyer95 1 year ago
@TeenFlyer95 OOOO yeah !!! lol
yahul25 1 year ago
so i landed in water im just guna leave all electrics and engines on okay take his licence man jesus!
xboxlivegstar11 1 year ago
I stopped flying a few years back but always thought that pilots who get jobs flying business jets are really really good at thier chosen carreer. The fact that this asshat broke soo many basic rules of flying is absolutely ridiculous. One of the things you learn very early on in your flying career is how to go through your shutdown drills in the event of a flight failure.
I am gobsmacked at how many failures in proceedure this pilot managed to accomplish.
darrindwp 1 year ago
Friend Tyler Kavoogian on facebook
Sharkfan77 1 year ago
So my question is; Since he made so many mistakes i.e.: Landing at a "no jet" airport, landing in tailwind, landing 2/3rd's short on runway, not reporting his position, etc. Did the insurance co. pay for loss/damage of plane & passengers? And did his pilot's license get revoked?
Does anyone know?
bruno2260 1 year ago
This guy is flying again with another citation with registration OY-WET
repsollenny 1 year ago 7
Wonder if this private jet was owned by the individual that was on board, or were they chartering it?
in2mobile 1 year ago
watertaxi :)
patmatSt 1 year ago
@patmatSt lol
shadowmorty 1 year ago
"Get there"-itis... realbad...
CEO of the company was probably in the pilots ear to "GET ME THERE and GET ME THERE NOW!"
bladedspokes 1 year ago
............and he was Waaaaaayyyyyy to fast over the numbers. shit, looked like about 140 kts, maybe a bit more. what was this idiot thinking? he should have been configured, and MUCH slower. wow..........amazes me the guys who can get a Jet Rating and be behind the controls of one of these machines. they're all lucky to be alive.
drumdude46 1 year ago
Apparently not sufficient training or just a plain Idiot or both.
Super3851 1 year ago
The OY prefix indicates it's from Denmark, fwiw.
altooname 1 year ago
What a complete muppett!! His registration number OY-JET should be changed to OY-WET!!
av8rdav 1 year ago
Comment removed
av8rdav 1 year ago
Expensive mistake, great footage of the jet moving thru the water! Gads. They were lucky!
venniey 1 year ago
The runway was wet, he landed directly into a 10 knot tailwind, the runway wasn't rated for jet aircraft anyway, The NTSB report showed throttle at 20% thrust setting after they fished the aircraft out of the bay. He overflew the airfield at 100 feet AGL. He landed about 2/3rd down the runway, this was just recipe for crash. WHERE DID THEY FIND THIS GUY?
umahuma4 1 year ago
@umahuma4 I'm still puzzled at how he missed the airport note "CLOSED TO JET TRAFFIC"
Belamom1 1 year ago
Comment removed
umahuma4 1 year ago
uma bela lancha; o unico erro foi do piloto e torre q altorizo aterragem da aeronave!!!
caralhoporra36 1 year ago
Jets need to be two pilot crews, all of them. If for no other reason than to disagree with the captain on a decision like this. What an idiot. At least he lost his ticket.
billandersonful 1 year ago
he didn't even cut the fuel from the engine before evacuating... what a pilot!!
maadvip 1 year ago
@maadvip Sometimes that won't cut it and you'll have to push the firewall shutoff. Water does funny things to airplanes.
billandersonful 1 year ago
*camera zooms in, plane is there*
*camera zooms out, pans around*
*camera zooms back in, plane is gone*
Classic.
AdamJLemon 2 years ago
shouldnt have landed downwind. Should have at least done landing distance calculations knowing that he was to land downwind
a0p0a070 2 years ago
Wow ! First time landing there?
cessnaworld 2 years ago
That's bizarre how the engine controller put the engine through a full start sequence up to full throttle.
jizzmonger 2 years ago
5:12 "oh boy" lol.
I love the anticlimatic commentary throughout the video
clof2001 2 years ago
Lmfao it's a personal jet/boat way to go.oh noes it's gonna take off
DIMATIF 2 years ago
V1 that bad boy was ready for take off lmao
OhMeMummah 2 years ago
very fast approach.
griposamayonst 2 years ago 2
My take is that the pilot(s) tried to salvage the engines because once in contact with salt water, they are lost. So since they knew the insurance will not cover for the accident, they thought they could at least save what's most valuable in the wreckage...
bdelatour 2 years ago
Amazing - thanks for posting this video!
Yabberfrat 2 years ago
Waste of a good aircraft...
Rolandhinio 2 years ago 2
They are lucky to have even gotten out alive. Plane could easily have broken up, people unconscious or drown.
MNBluestater 2 years ago 2
It's hard to believe this guy was a real pilot. He made no position reports on UNICOM though there was a 182 in the pattern for the opposite runway. He overflew the field at 100 feet AGL!!! he turned right to fly the pattern for 11 at 200 to 300 feet AGL!!! Landed 2/3's of the way down the runway in a tailwind when there was not enough room even if he hit the numbers!! It's as if someone's 15 year old kid stole a citation after flying one in MS flight simulator!
edomalley1 2 years ago 28
im 17 and play a crap load of fsx and have taken a flight lesson. I CLEARLY would not have done that. I would have gone around obviously.
This is a perfect example of how charter pilots are hired by their contacts, NOT their skill.
kingneptune117 2 years ago
@kingneptune117 I lol @ u man...just cause the market is tough nowadays, it doesn't mean u won't get a job when ur done with ur atpl...cause I know this is what its all about:P and how the hell is that guy a charter pilot?..
shortygasp 2 years ago
I am not a jet pilot but I actually jest read in flying magazine today about the problem with go arounds in jets. Espically in a situation like this. They could have possibly not had enough runway or clear space ahead for a successfull go around. In that case, they would have plowed into that river at a much faster speed then if they just hit the breaks as fast as they could. Though I'm not claiming to know for sure. 1st time I saw this I wondered the same thing. But that article made sense
gofastER 2 years ago
@edomalley1 I bet you it was some rich guy that bought the most expensive aircraft he can buy and (being a complete idiot) thinking he could fly it
bowlingwithzombies 1 year ago
@edomalley1 this means he is very lucky!
However this is the first time I see a plane (not amphibious) taxiing over the water :-). Amazing.
Another "strange" thing: it continue to float over and over and it doesn't sink!
Well, the best part is that nobody (I think) got injured, and the pilot (maybe) learned a lesson.
Tecnobingo 1 year ago
@edomalley1 How do you know he didn't say anything over the radio?
atvmaster281 1 year ago
If the pilot had secured the aircraft as he is supposed to do, he would have shut off the electricity and fuel supplies before getting out, - for exactly this reason. It also helps reduce the chance of an after-crash fire and when people are being evacuated. Most firefighters become less effective rescuing people from a downed aircraft when there's a screaming jet engine scaring the hell out of them. This pilot should have lost his license and been prosecuted no matter what country he's from.
sonadavinci 2 years ago 3
Apparently this owner of this aircraft has a sense of humor..
The new reg. number of this jet's replacement is "OY- WET"
haha...
I pulled this off FL330
OY-WET
Weibel Equipment A/S
Cessna 680 Citation Sovereign
(cn 680-0067)
Bremen (- Neuenland) (BRE / EDDW)
Germany, May 24, 2009
Tamaslammer 2 years ago 2
Wow... 3 years later and this video is still titled as happening in Atlanta Bay.... sheesh...
Some Americans are fucking lazy....
patton303 2 years ago
The worst thing is that the Danish CEO didn't admit his foul flying skills but tried to blame the brakes. The Press had a field day because two passengers were young women... My guess was too is that he was showing off
hrc1966 2 years ago
Nice, an 18 million dollar jet boat. Very fashionable.
MrBobsmith734 2 years ago
why he did not asked for a touch and go ?
it seems like a very fast landing
mjksoccer 2 years ago
The pilot didn't leave engines running. Water shorted the elec. system, & engaged the starter. All the engine needed then was something to ignite the fuel & there you go - a running jet engine.
According to NTSB, the plane needed more runway than was avail. - PLUS he landed 1000 ft long - PLUS he landed with a 10-15 kt tailwind - PLUS he landed @ an airport that specifically forbade jets to land, which was stated on the chart in his cockpit. He might have made it in the opposite direction.
PilotMusician 2 years ago 15
Im not questioning your point about the water engaging the starter - however shouldnt it have short curcuited the system or something, and stopped it from working completely? Im not doubting you im just curious - cheers
EIN771 2 years ago
EIN771:
I'm not certain of all the details, but the NTSB determined that water in the circuitry caused the malfunction that started the engine. I don't know exactly where to read the NTSB report, but it should be easy to find on the web.
Another interesting thing about this accident is that the pilot circled the airport before landing, so he got a view of the windsock before attempting his downwind landing. In the NTSB report, he blamed failed brakes, but it would have made no difference.
PilotMusician 2 years ago
thanks for the info!
EIN771 2 years ago
@PilotMusician But what i'd like to know is how the engine got fuel. As you probably know, the starters in a CJ only spin the fans to pull air into the engine. The fuel doesn't reach the engine until the N2 percentage reaches a certain point and the pilot pushes the throttles out of the "Cutoff" position into the "Idle" position. Maybe the crash wrecked the valve, allowing fuel to rush in?
E240JA 1 year ago
@E240JA Well, all of this is supposition, but I doubt the throttles were in cutoff position. My guess is that the engines flamed out from the initial splash-in, and with the engines off, the pilot then concentrated on getting the passengers off the plane safely, without going through the shutdown (since the engines were already "shut down"). Again, just a guess.
PilotMusician 1 year ago
@PilotMusician see the tail JOY-JET LoL understatement
akula5151 10 months ago
um why didn't the pilot cut the throttle b4 leaving his plane??
msav111 2 years ago
what the hell is pilot doing in the water?trying to rescue the plane by starting engines?OMG
Kezzap48 2 years ago
i think the pilot is trying to use all the fuel so it will not float into the water and kill alot of life. and when a plane is emty for fuel its like a bomb without the explosive. anyway can any of u guys see the wings??
nicora60 2 years ago
Nice boat
RaptureandZune 2 years ago
OY-JET(2) Weibel Scientific A/S. Damaged 15.5.2005 Atlantic City, Bader Field, New Jersey, N525SA, PR-WOB
jonathankochhougaard 2 years ago
How many things have to short out for an engine to spool up, start, and throttle up??? Seriously
Zepcono 2 years ago
what did the guy said on 0:04?
Davissiu 2 years ago
Your forgot his improper decision to leave the engines running when he exited the plane
PsuPepperoni 2 years ago
Looked like the jet was pretty pissed off that it had such a dumb pilot.
Adeon55 2 years ago 2
did re restart the engines to sail it out of the water
puttytogo 2 years ago
This happened on May 15, 2005. All four occuopants survived, airplane was a write off.
tubeyou443 2 years ago
eww nasty sound at 3:16
1whiteiphone 2 years ago
OOPS!!!!
twflightservicemgr78 2 years ago
"I think he made it."
"Where is he?! I lost him!"
hahahahahaha!!!
kunigas123 2 years ago 3
Airport Remarks section of the Atlantic City/Bader Field Airport entry,
"Arpt CLOSED to jet traffic." Additionally, runway 11 was a 2,948 foot-long, 100 foot-wide,
asphalt runway.
According to the Cessna 525A Landing Distance Chart, an airplane with a landing weight of 11,400
pounds required 3,000 feet of landing distance, in a no wind situation. With a 10 knot tailwind,
the airplane required 3,570 feet of landing distance.
nemo227 2 years ago 2
HAHAHAHA
SAB14N 2 years ago
first of all, the pilot was going way too fast. second, he should've been landing on the other side of the runway. pilots need to learn to do things better, especially this one.
tjisnumbaone 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
epopchock 2 years ago
I couldn't agree more. But there is one thing disagree with here about the landing. He should not have landed at this airport in the first place. I just read in an article online that this airport is not designed to handle jets. The runway was far too short for this fast-moving plane. What the hell were those pilots thinking anyway? I don't understand why they didn't divert to another airport.
epopchock 2 years ago
situations dictate... could have been a possible emergency landing, could have had other nearby runways closed due to weather, or could have had some insistent ritsy prick of a passenger that insisted on landing at this airport. I don't know, but I'm sure him being a pilot, he knew the potential risks before he even approached the runway. Something tells me there's more to this than a simple pilot error. I agree with everything you're saying tho, but there are alot of "what if's" here.
Spartan8531 2 years ago
completely right there. what the hell was he thinking??? how do these guys get licences and then do something fundementally stupid like that?? utter madness and i hope he doesn't fly anymore
supertuber97 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stupid cunt camera man blind idiot lost it when the plane was about to crash!!!
Toilu 2 years ago
This was just citation testing out their new submersible plane
powderkillr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow they guy speaking is a typical American moron.
xterrasesc 2 years ago
is there insurance for that shit?
stormthorgerson 2 years ago
What the hell was the pilot trying to prove by driving around in the water? Did he think he could takeoff with the plane halfway in the water? No wonder he ended up in the lake.
Permaglo 3 years ago
dude, your a knob. there is nobody in it when it spools up
o2fst4uo 3 years ago
Then the pilot is an idiot for not shutting the engines off.
Permaglo 3 years ago
they malfunctioned and turned on by themselves -.-
hellomotosux 3 years ago
The pilot IS INDEED still in the aircraft. I kid you not.
Look at the end, he opens the door for the police and admitted later he tried to "drive" to surface.
Hannoi 3 years ago
The cut off shorted out. The funniest part of this video is that the girls on the plane are topless. Apparently this guy and his buddy would give girls rides but they had to be topless. I'm not sure if you can see it from the video or not.
RobertGary1 3 years ago
What, are you like 14?
panictactics 3 years ago
You don't think the fact that he was flying around with topless women funny?
RobertGary1 3 years ago
Sure he was kid.
panictactics 3 years ago
"that guy,is one crazy son' a bitch"
Quinn509 3 years ago
looks like a battlefield 2 glitch
medicineman2100 3 years ago
why blame the pilot,u assholes if u slowed down it would be a hard landing which might have caused huge chaos!!the runaway is too short and planes land at different speeds,do u expect to land a mig29 on this runaway?
sshapewa 3 years ago
Planes are not made for water
erictall22 3 years ago
cessna amphibian is...
doormaneamons 3 years ago
when did this happen?
cantbefooled 3 years ago
where's a parachute brake when you need one.
jxwhee 3 years ago
Hey Ding Dong, it is NOT the Atlanta Bay. It is actually called the "Inside Thorofare" and is the waterway between the Bader Field (now closed) airport and Atlantic City, NJ. If you look you will see the Atlantic City Casinos in the background. The accident was caused by the pilot attempting to land on a runway that was not long enough for his Jet. Strange thing is a few miles away is a much larger airport that he could have landed on safely.
AceLockCo 3 years ago
Actually, he was landing downwind as sed in the vid, but i'm not sure about runway length. But the fact that he was way too fast, due to attpemting to land downwind was a major factor
rcheliboy 3 years ago
The runway was WAY too short for any jet to land. The runway was only 2900 feet long, about 500 feet shorter than the MINIMUM length for a Cessna Citation X (what the jet was). The runway was designed for commuter traffic (prop planes) and for sea planes. The airport has since been closed, but it does have a lot of history.
AceLockCo 3 years ago
Still, count that for TWO big mistakes on part of the pilot. Landing on a strip too short AND downwind. He'd have had a much better chance flying into the wind.
waddsworth 3 years ago
inspection of the pilot's charts after the accident showed that his chart clearly stated that the airport was a NO JET airport.
AceLockCo 3 years ago
Amazing, you know how to read wikipedia. Good job. 3400 feet is not the MINIMUM distance required for landing. 3400 is for a given weight, and does not take tail/head wind into account. Point is, you don't help your chances of successfully landing on a short strip by flying WITH the wind.
waddsworth 3 years ago
What? Schmuck, was my local air strip and I knew about this the day it happened. Now the real point is DON'T LAND A JET AT AN AIRPORT THAT IS CLOSED TO JET TRAFFIC! This accident is 100% due to multiple errors on the part of the pilot.
AceLockCo 3 years ago 3
AceLockCo, you are a full of shit asshole. How about a cup of shut the fuck up? Clown!
panictactics 3 years ago
Your mom is full of my dick.
I know the facts, you just don't want to hear them. If you want to argue, call the FAA, and tell them they are wrong.
AceLockCo 3 years ago
Give me their phone number then, asshole.
panictactics 3 years ago
Here you go dickhead 1-866-835-5322
AceLockCo 3 years ago
Thank you. I will call these bastards.
panictactics 3 years ago
Let me know what they say cocksmoker.
AceLockCo 3 years ago
Gear down, throttles up, master switch on. Yup, we're ready to go fishing.
CousinDupree 3 years ago 5
Pretty slow boat for being jet powered!
totingomes 3 years ago
"OY JET"
hehe..
udv11 3 years ago
augh the insurance bought them a new one nothing lost !
wisecracked2 3 years ago
he made an emergency landing and gone wrong, but no injuries at the end, so lucky.
farodkhaledmossad 3 years ago
The pilot was a dick .... at 1:45 onwards the narrator clearly shows the wind speed & direction.. The pilot was landing with a severe TAIL wind.. & NOT into wind as he should. what an ass!
xoio 3 years ago
Eight knots is not what anybody would call "severe"
artgoat 3 years ago
He was Still landing with a TAIL wind! which is idiotic when there IS the alternative of landing in the other direction.
xoio 3 years ago
The fact of the matter is, he chose to land on a runway already too short, with a tail wind which meant he made a potentially fatal decision right there. His incompetence was further amplified by his touching down 1/3 of the way down the runway. He gave himself only 1900 ft of stopping distance as opposed to the 3500+ feet that was necessary for a safe landing. Thats a quarter-mile difference. Finally, he is VERY LUCKY that the engine that relit did not explode, as it very well could have.
Historymaker2001 3 years ago 2
0 0
---.... oh my thats weird
iride3 3 years ago
What caused the engine to throttle up? computer controled??
Goldengoat23 3 years ago
I was told it was some sort of auto-restart circuit. It may also have been an electrical short, as water may have flooded the Avionics compartment, depending on where this is located in the CitJet.
I personally, am surprised the engine actually caught on. Good selling point for the engine manufacturer... "100% starting guarantee, even when half-drowned!!!!"
Historymaker2001 3 years ago
Typically on the Citation series, the Ignitions are supposed to be turned on for landing as well as Fuel Pumps, and odds are that the pilot did not place the engines in the cut-off position once getting out.
elbell206 3 years ago
There's a nice manual q from a fire engine there. Good to hear those.
Jerram89 3 years ago
That pilot's career is over, because that pilot just destroy a multi-million dollar jet.
pcmiler2000 3 years ago
that seems more like an ATC's fault.
swisscheeze13 3 years ago
Bader Field was uncontrolled by ATC, and as AeroplanumMaximum stated, the PIC has the final say in operation and direction of the aircraft.
Historymaker2001 3 years ago
"That pilot's career is over, because that pilot just destroy a multi-million dollar jet."
How about endangerment of human life, and negligence of published air traffic restrictions and regulations?
Historymaker2001 3 years ago
Wow good vid man!
*
>-->
BostonTrucker 3 years ago
By the way...NOW THAT IS WHAT I CALL A JET SKI!!
PIlotrcm 3 years ago 5
Isn't this Bader Field, Atlantic City, NJ? I've landed their in some prop jobs. Its pretty short. All it takes to get behind the wheel of a jet is a whole lota money. Not skill, talent, or expierence. As a flight instructor we have a saying, "Whats the most dangerous thing in the air?"..."A doctor in a Bonanza!" I've flown with some of the richest, exec's, business leaders and owners, and even though they are great money makers, their flying skills suck and they think they are the shit.
PIlotrcm 3 years ago
Are u saying that the pilot own this jet.
pcmiler2000 3 years ago
OY-JET dansish jet :D
mattec2 3 years ago
did someone forget to turn the engine off
cschin11 3 years ago
Pretty slow boat for being jet powered!
MalcolmXcrement 3 years ago 3
The pilot attempted to land on a wet 2 948 foot runway at an airport which usually does not accept jets with a 10-knot tailwind. But the airplane would require 3 500 feet with that tailwind.
rama767 3 years ago
gotta be drunk!
djfrenzy69 3 years ago
not drunk, just danish
tesla120 3 years ago
what an idiot. Not only did he run his jet into the river, he tried to GET IT OUT BY USING THE ENGINE. Yea dumbass... thats why theres something called a boat, you know... made for water.
largephAtman 3 years ago
Ok, the Runway was CLOSED TO JET A/C 525A rego OY-JET did a fly by, landed down wind, (2948 ft) the posted weight for 11,400 lb ac (which this was ) with a 10 mph tail wind was 3570 ft. The Closed to Jet traffic notice was TAPED on the Control collum, NTSB report states "PIC imporoper decision to plan a flt to a runway of insuff length. 2 imp inflt decision to land on that runway with a tail wind, failure to obtain proper touch down point. The RW being wet was No factor INJ 1 minor, 3 uninj"
usmctanks1 3 years ago