Added: 5 years ago
From: ladycblack1
Views: 36,561
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (39)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • fukin shit

  • Them compared to well ...Bill Gates

  • richard farely was miles better than that new asian guy

  • amen

  • apparently each interview lasts 6 hours or so, but they only show ten minutes for obvious reasons.... isnt that interesting.

  • no because its a load of bullshit! it isnt 6 hours at all!!!

  • yeh because they need to examine every possible business strategy to make sure they arent going to lose money by investing. its impossible to do that in a ten minute slot.

  • no! it fuckin isnt 6 hours though!! its about half an hour MAX!!

  • But we're agreed it isn't an hour?

    therefore I've won.

    MWAHAHAHA

  • your an idiot its not 6 hours you mug, u dont have a clue about buisness

  • Well I'm a Law student at Cambridge, so no business isn't my specialist subject.

    Business studies seemed a huge waste of time.

    and you clearly missed the word 'apparently'. that one delightful word suggests it could or could not be true.

    And it's 'You're' and 'You' and 'Business'.

  • EVERYTHING you do will have business invloved, so business is imprtant and should be studied.

  • Comment removed

  • I meant, 10 minutes.

  • Can someone please tell me who are the singers of this song and whats it called?

  • These people seem, largely, proof that you've generally got to be a ruthless arsehole to make alot of money from business..

  • Its a tv show . Its would hav probably been best to research wot they are like in real life before coming up with stupid assumptions.

    In business im sure they would hav to of strong character to get where they are , but i wouldnt say " ruthless arseholes "

    U seem largely proof that people believe anything that they see on tv without questioning it.

  • Firstly, if you're making patronising arguments don't use "U" instead of "You", "Wot" instead of "What", or even 'Its' instead of "It's".

    In terms of me "seeming largely proof that people believe anything that they see on TV without questioning it", you couldn't have said it to a worse person: I've spent the last three years at Birmingham university studying Chomsky, Foucault, Baudrillard, McLuhan, Gramsci, Althusser, and all the other leading socio-political media theorists!

    Like wot eva.

  • No " like woteva " im not a chav son . Im just abbreviating my words. I never patronised you in the first place.

    " These people seem, largely, proof that you've generally got to be a ruthless arsehole to make alot of money from business.. " was your statement.

    There is no proof of this. Its all panto on the show and shows nothing about real business character.

    Is it possible for you to get a refund on that University??

  • Clearly you want to look superior with a fantastic education and yet on the other hand seem to be void of common sense???

    Money wasted???

    ..................... i'll have large fries with that please.

    ( sure spelling wont matter as much for that )

  • I wasn't trying to look superior mentioning my education it's just you ironically tried to patronise me on the one topic that I'm particularly well-informed in!

  • Also, when you say "Its a tv show.. you should research what they're like in real life before coming to assumptions"

    ..You only benefit my point: It IS a TV show, they WOULD have researched what these people are like in real life, and therefore they would have been after the biggest arseholes they could find - for good television. It's 'Dragons den' not 'Lovely Yuppies'.

    That being said, James Caan seems like a nice guy.

  • Im not benifiting your point , your point is way of the mark. These guys are far from the biggest aresholes in business You think Rachael or Richard were chosen in previous series because they were arseholes??

    Dragons have a proven track records in various fields and each have very different personalities, making for an entertaining show

    Dont find any of them "ruthless areseholes" they just play up to an image of tough business men / women .

    All panto man.

  • I don't think it's panto so much. Certainly their 'nastier' moments are the ones that make the edit, but otherwise they are really looking for business opportunities, and you can see them genuinely get angry and nasty.

    I'm not denying their business acumen, but certain characteristics, such as being ethical or timid or 'nice', undeniably run against what it often takes to be an excellent capitalist. That's not true in every case, but I wouldn't want to share a drink with these people.

  • Deborah Meaden-can you upload more of her plz? thnx 4 this

  • My favourite tv program ever.

  • There all about of douchebags, listen to adam and joes last podcast where they try to pitch ideas to the dragons and say that debra looks like a fish from findin nemo lol

  • Thanks for sharing that wisdom but no i won't be listen to that

  • did u know they are not even real dragons?

  • noo richard farley!!

  • Peter Jones is the best... come on now.

  • Okay maybe Peter is like the 3rd best lol; Theo & Duncan are way hotter tho! ;)

  • hell yes !!

  • hehe ;)

  • ...Theo Paphitis is my fave, closely followed by Duncan... actually, I love them all!!!

  • Lol cool i loove theo !!! and yeah duncan is so funny !

  • yeh lol I love his dry sense of wit!

  • I LOVE DRAGONS DEN!!!! This is awesome :-D

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more