so we could end up having another 3 earths kinda by trying to terraform venus/ mars & the moon into earthlike worlds? Mmm... Me thinks lets look after our planet first & all its people lets all fair go before we go heading of into the unknown.
It is possible to terraform both Venus and Mars and if we were able to change them we could fix anything that may be wrong with the Earth i.e. Global Warming. The moon however would be the greatest challenge think how the moon effects earth and its oceans. Now imagine that except the Earth effecting the moon and any bodies of water. And it may have effects on the Earth magnetic field as well.
@RollTideFootball global warming is a natural oscillatory phenomenon, happened hundreds of times exactly the same way during just the past few million years. We do have a contribution to greenhousa gases, but our contribution compares to, say, the effect of the giant bog in syberia exiting the state of permafrost, approx 1 to a 100 during the process of the next century, an there is absolutely nothing you can do about THAT, currently. There is no hippie way of survival either.
@DuPuieproductions I love the universe, and my planet. I hate religion and any kind of government. I have all my life thought of being a planet not countries... if any one else would get it... but just a few get it... bah, I'll just smoke some bowls for the moment.. :(
there are possible solution perhaps in the far future, we could create a transparent "bubble".
I'm not sure what it would be made out of, perhaps carbon nanotubes, or a clear hydrocarbon self-healing polymer, it will help keep atmosphere for the newly terraformed moon from being eroded.
Terraforming the moon will present it's own challenges, the moon does not have a powerful magnetosphere, and its 1/6th surface gravity allows solar winds to strip it's newly formed atmosphere much faster then Mars, Mars you can continuously replenish, since it would take millions of years for solar winds to strip away, replenishment would easily compete with the atmospheric erosion. However on moon, what I'd like to know is how long would it take for it to have its atmosphere stripped.
@aletool Staying on earth is a bad idea if you want to enssure that humanity lives on. Every year we dont do anything the chance of increases of a comet or asteroid hitting the earth and killing us all
what this video fails to tell you is that none of these planets has magnetic field to stop their atmosphere being blown away by the suns solar wind FAIL
@TheHemsworthboy perhaps in the next 10s of thousands of years, humanity would be advanced enough to create some sort of artificial magnetic field to keep shit from being blown off.
Mars would be the first experiment to test that.
If we teraformed Mars but were too lazy to build this artificial magnetic field to protect entire world, Mars would loose most it's atmosphere in only 10s of millions of years.
What I find funny is how if we were to do this, we would probably have to use so much eenergy that we would create an atmosphere on those planets that is in no better condition than that of today's earth
at least with unlimited atmospheric energy i.e. static lightning. to run all your industrial plants enormous orbital solar potential, and vast amounts of chemical resources with no need to worry about global warming from your industry we could turn venus into the industrial heart of the solar system
Apparently 99% of Earth's atmosphere was created by life. Some scientists hold the view that introducing basic life forms - ones designed specifically for that planet's environment - on other planets is the only feasible way to ensure terraforming would work.
The process would of course take millions of years.
LOVED the presentation! Question: if Venus provides radiation shielding simply by virtue of the atmosphere, wouldn't Mars fans argue that "all" we have to do is cook up enough regolith and change the albedo of Mars to create some atmosphere? (Imagine the sheer ENERGY requirements to do that.) Some imagine releasing gigatons of super-greenhouse gases 17thousand times more powerful than Co2. Who knows what robot terraforming machines of the future might do?
i dont get it? on mars is a lot of carbondioxide right? and plants turn that to oxygen right? we only have to put plants on the middle of mars and after a few years we could live on mars, jeez... in my pants lol
@siperdellyeer wait though you forget it is rather cold on mars the plants would freeze and die but if there was a way we could warm up mars then we may just be able to live on it it would be difficult to transfer humans though... MAYBE many 100 years forward we will try or succeed in trying
@siperdellyeer: Yes but the atmosphere is not thick enough. I don't think there's *enough* Co2 on Mars, it's not even 1 atmosphere in pressure, so you might convert some of it to oxygen but there would not be enough. That's why in the Kim Stanley Robinson Red/Green/Blue Mars trilogy they spend a lot of time explaining how robot droid rocket ships hurl asteroids into Mars just to thicken the atmosphere a bit.
@TheEclipsenow so if we can make a thicker atmosphere and put some factory's that produce Co2 it would be possible to live on mars right? + NASA found fossils on mars from bacteria, maybe that would mean that it would be easier to terraform mars... we will see over 20 years if something is changed
@ZarukaCamoran we will have mapped out the human brain and have total brain prosthesis within 50 years
once you can upload consciousness into a more efficient medium than our biology there will be no reason to colonize anything other than a vast number of super computers and back ups floating across space.
Of course if we augment our intelligence infinitely to a godlike sentience, with no biology to provide motivation, we'd be a collective vegetable unless we limited ourselves with simulation.
If the relentless solar winds eventually blow all that sufuric acid off planet Venus then just maybe we could settle in the polar regions of our sister planet.
@HeartStrikerz by the next billion years the sun would be 10% brighter, the average temperature would be well over 100 degrees F, i suppose by then we could move earth 5% farther, figure out a economical and technical way to do so.
gliese 581 and its other planet planets b,c,d, and g away from us sure that the planets orbit around the gliese 581 and its away to its trillion trillion miles away to us its so far i want to go from it all is green to planet of gliese 581 its called superearth or extra solar planets its so ugly planets to glise with super blue i dont like it its other earth family to us sun and its partner star gliese 581 is the same but different colors gliese 581 is red dwarf and sun
@Spacefrisian Terraforming is a long term solution that requires no maintenance, gives humans a natural (Earth-like) environment to live in (avoiding possible psychological and physical damage), has much more potential for expansion (unaided), and is entirely self sufficient from the start.
Not to mention we need to concern ourselves with what's going on right here, before looking elsewhere, because before too long, there won't be any resources to do diddly squat.
Wouldn't it be illogical to attempt to terraform the moon, as it is tidally locked? I can see colonies, but terraforming would be wasteful by half, really. Not to mention it's difficult to create an atmosphere, versus modifying an existing one. I would, if it were plausible, and up to me, start with Mars first. then try to develop a way to do it to Venus. That way we can ship the religious fanatics, criminals and other miscreants to Mars, leaving Earth & Venus to be plentiful and peaceful. heh
Terraforming venus would be a waste of time for multiple reasons... and I'm not sure the moon would have enough gravity.... maybe but we'd have to replenish it like a mofo...
Mars on the other hand would be (relatively) easy to terraform, not take too long either... and If we survive long enough as a species will be necessary in about 400-500 million years.
Love the idea of making life on other planets but it's so far away my grandchilds, grandchild...grandchild wont see it. but we need to sort out a few 1000's of problems first. first been fuel, if we put as much money into finding a viable source to replace it as we do drilling it and buying it we'd have one by now haha (maybe not but you get my point) as many other problems.
Anyone seen the film Terra? knaff film but great concept and so on.
We're gonna run out of fuel a long, long, long, long, LONG time before we've successfully terraformed Marrs, and it's not like Mars is gonna have any fuel for us.
@Darko2625 /facepalm, No, but it is DAMN expensive. Transporting people from Earth to Mars Alone would not be worth the trip. Plus, who would want to live on Mars? Some scientist might, but really? It would be like Antarktika, only a thousand times worse.
And humanity maybe will give the lots of money for this but after all will be done,humanity will be so proud of Blue-Green Mars And people will realize that terraformed Mars wasn't wasted time and money.
@Darko2625 Seriously, Humans do not work like that, we're Greedy. We do not care about the majority. And I still say that we Do not simply have the technology, it will take Many Centuries before we're even close. The only thing I think that has a chance of this is Quantum Physics (teleportation Ect.). A Constant Portal between Earth and Mars might make it worth it, but else I don't really see it.
@DHGameStudios You need to more study quantum physics. if you want to teleportate,you need to be ripped in atoms and if you are ripped in atoms you will be dead. This is science fiction,but terraforming is science fact.
I think people should look more into setting up bases in the upper atmosphere of Venus. Perhaps from there terraforming would be easy. Since the atmosphere is so thick, it would be easier to stay afloat in an airship.
@MrC0MPUT3R thats the problem they would have to make floating city's we dont have that technology yet and a airship needs somebody and something to keep it in the air like gaz or energy and using a machine to do that kinda job would take forever
venus is still active but it is too hot. the moon has no atmosphere and is to small. in the summer mars can get as warm as 20 degrees near the equator. so i pick mars best candidate for this process.
@crib1981 actually the highest record mars has gotten was 70 degrees, and Venus's runaway Greenhouse effect is the cause of the heat so if we can stabilize or possibly get rid of it , Mars and Venus would both be eligible for life
Id say Mars is the only one possible to terraform. no point in moon because its right next to us and to small. and Venus well..... you would be dead :L
@CrownChanel The atmosphere is too small and we can't build an atmosphere there because it would get blown away by the solar wind. And if we got the atmosphere thick enough we would plant plants to make the oxygen.
@Salien1999 We could build domes on the planet while it's being terraformed although we don't have the technology for it YET. And we would have to wait thousands of years for it to be terraformed though.
@Donutz0wnu Apparently you don't understand. The atmosphere is NEEDED I'm not saying we won't live long enough to build one, I'm saying that we can't. There's no magnetic field to protect the atmosphere, so it would be blown off the planet.
It would be FAR cheaper to research ideas for space warp and ideas we haven't even thought of yet to get to other planets all most instantly and colonize those planets.
Ships at light speed is no good,..it's painfully slow compared to the size of the universe,..just to get to the nearest star is 4.5 years. We need an alternative.
Think about this. How long would the population put up with the cost of such a task.
Especially for something that will not affect them in their life time.
Interest would be lost quickly, look how fast the population lost interest in the Apollo program.
It would cost pretty much every person on earth their paycheck for life to cover the cost. To put JUST Armstrong in space it cost his body weight in gold.
@Illuminati10101 but If we can set up a permenant base or what ever you want to call it on the moon we could harvest the helium 3 which is used in nuclear fusion thus solving the worlds energy shortage and making it alot cheaper in the long run
@Illuminati10101 These are the reasons why Mars is not naturally habitable. However, we can re-engineer the planet to fit our needs. The technologies to do this aren't there yet, but there is reason to believe we'll have the means by the end of this century if not sooner.
@Illuminati10101 Mars once did have an atmosphere and water, it has been proven. But it has vicious winds as such that violently have destroyed the water and atmosphere.
@benp2207 I'm aware that Mars once had an atmosphere, it still does actually but mostly Carbon Dioxide. We need air which is like 78% Nitrogen and 21% oxygen with traces of mixed gasses like Carbon. How engineers plan on getting the right balance of gasses and maintaining them is beyond me. We cannot survive on oxygen or Nitrogen alone,.It's a mixture.
All these hurdles doesn't make it feasible, the cost would be too great.
@RuleTwilightPrincess Pluto? What you talking about. Pluto is ball of frozen gas,it's completely wasteland. Maybe colony can be built on Pluto,but terraforming...never! Study the things,then teach others!
@commandplay The moon cannot support an atmosphere for long periods of times because of this, but if we continually create the atmosphere it wouldn't be a problem. Remember these places are dead for a reason; the influence of human engineering however could solve these problems left us by nature.
Luna's gained distance from Earth caused tidle forces to weaken too much in which it could not sustain volcanic activity to produce and sustain an atmosphere. For Mars, if it had one or more moons it could have slowed the cooling down enough for Mars to still have volcanic activity which would have sustained a dense atmosphere to trap enough heat to keep water in liquid state, if the moons stay close to Mars to sustain warmth, they could have sustained a dense atmosphere and give birth to life.
This is a beautiful video. Venus, Earth, Earth's one single moon "Luna" in it's Earthian moon system, and Mars, are all in the habital temperature zone. It's sad that only one body out of 4 ended up with the proper characteristics to give birth to life. I think Venus formed a rotatation speed that's to slow (about 58 Earth days just to go from sunrise to sunset) and got too hot on the daytime side causing it's water to turn to gas faster than it turns back to liquid through precipitation.
Most scientists believe that Mars's core cooled down faster than Terra's because Mars is much smaller. Therefore much of the liquid iron in the Martian core solidified and stopped spinning, causing the Martian magnetic field to disappear. This allows solar winds to gradually strip away the ionized upper atmosphere of Mars.
@iOnlySignIn But these two moons orbiting Mars are not "true" moons they're two small astroids that got caught by Mars' gravity. Real moons are sphere shaped worlds orbiting a planet like Luna, IO, Europa, Charon, Enceledus, Miranda ext. If we can't concider Pluto, Makemake, Eries, ect. planets then how can an astroid be concidered a moon? Mars may have cooled faster because of it's smaller size but tidle heating from moons would keep each other internally hot.
@wiseye61 We can terraform Earth's moon "Luna" if we can find a way to cause Luna's internal temperature to rise. This will cause internal pressure to rise and reactivate Luna's volcanoes which can help bring back a Lunar atmosphere. This may also cause Luna to develope it's own magnetic field as well. One way this can be done is to bring it back much closer to Earth so it can receive tidle heating, though that would be a very difficult task, but would not say it's impossible.
the moon doesn't have sufficient mass to hold its own atmosphere, and it might disrupt its unique balance with earth if you were to increase it's mass by smashing asteroids onto it.
we can still increase mars by smashing asteroids onto it though :]
@wiseye61 Luna has more than enough gravity to hold an atmosphere. The problem is that it's volcanoes have not erupted in so long, that the Lunar atmosphere has been long gone. If Luna stayed much closer to Earth, the Earthian gravitational pull along with Luna's would cause permanent tidle heating (as long as it stays in place) and may have ended up being a world thriving with life.
@wiseye61 Venus has about 11% less gravity than Earth but still holds an atmosphere 90 times denser than Earth's. Mars lost volcanic activity a very long time ago or has it but millions of years apart, has 37% gravity and still has enough atmosphere left that our ships need heat shield tiles or they would burn up entering Mars' atmosphere. Uranus has 10% less gravity but still ended up becoming a gas giant. Titan has less gravity than Luna but has an atmosphere more than double of Earth's.
@wiseye61 Also Pluto with between 6% and 7% of Earth's gravity and less than half of Luna's gravity is believed to have a thin atmosphere. When New Horizons arrives to Pluto we may possibly end up discovering that the Plutonian atmosphere is much denser than we thought, maybe even very close to being as dense as the Earthian atmosphere.
@EarthianLifeForm Yea, we don't want to screw with our moon. Provided, it'd be lovely, and nay, 'tis not impossible to terraform the moon I bet, I just don't think there's a way to do it without causing negative impacts for earth unless we give the entire moon a biodome.
@Gregourii In the long term, yes, but the atmosphere would remain life supporting for a million years or so. It's a problem, but not an immediate "solve it or it won't work" problem.
here's what you do for mars, add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, causing a green house effect, and raising the temperature melting the ice caps, then you plant trees where the water is, which eats up the extra carbon dioxide, and naturally adds oxygen to the atmosphere. After about 100 years it should be inhabitable.
drastically. So in the first place its not about reducing air pressure etc. If you would approuc terraforming that way it would be "mopping with the tap opening" (which "previous text" is a saying in my language, not sure if its a saying in english aswell, but you probably know the drift of that saying.
So first we need to make venus spinning more rapidly. What a much bigger challenge then actualy reducing pressure that is.
biggest problem about venus is that it barely spins. To make a eco climate similar to eath we need to make it rotate. Right now its a boiler on one side creating severe climates and winds. Therefore (apart from the dense atmosphere) it doesnt matter if your on the nightside or not. in 10hours the air that has located on the suns side has blown to the night side and in 10 more hours returned to the day sight of venus. if it rotated similar to earth (24hours per rotation) the climate would change
@Armigo91 Finally someone has thought of the most probable reason Venus failed to be a world thriving with life. It is so obvious that it has to do with rotation. Both Venus and Mars are within the habitable temperature zone. If you rotate a marshmellow over a fire too slowly it will catch on fire, if you increased the distance a little to mimic that of Earth or Mars, it would still catch on fire, it would just take a little longer. Even Mercury's poles don't go beyond habitable temperatures.
Terraforming is a little far, but can install kind of big tent and reduce the proportion of azote to fit the need in oxygen, and start extracting with more inteligent and competent tools, machinery and vehicle
like the most sick industrial and spacial age ever imagined that have production reduced to almost nothing on large bulk.. and that start, but later with Ai we can kind of teleport humanity on anything that a machine orbit and land and that is also already terraformed..)
If we developed some sort of teleportation (Disapearing from a place, and then reapearing in another) technology, then I would start believing in space a lot more.
However, transmitting matter can't exactly be cheap in resources, but it would without a doubt change everything. So guys, if you wanna be a scientist and wanna make space "Explorable", do Quantum Physics, it's the future! -From what I heard.
Sorry guys, but space just don't pay off at all. The amount of money, resources and time is all impossible.
1. Space explorations doesn't give any profit
2. The amount of money/resources needed just to get a space station in orbit around the earth is so damn high, that it would be cheaper (even in the long run) to just do it the old fashioned way.
3. Even if we successfully Terraformed a planet, what then? Nothing, because moving people to populate it would also cost tons of resources/money.
@DHGameStudios And how the hell you know that? How many valuable items are in asteroids or other planets? Who knows... And what you think,what you will do when you suck up all resources of fossil fuels from Earth? Space exploration and colonization is our destiny,if humanity just stick to the Earth,we are dead. Period.
@Darko2625 It's pretty damn common knowledge, we simply do NOT have the technology to do it, and it would take centuries to figure out atleast some of the small things they do in science fictions. It costs Millions to launch a rocket for Mars with 5 people onboard, who can only stay there for a day or so. Colonies would never be able to be independent, they would constantly need raw materials from Earth, which would again cost MORE money....
@DHGameStudios Terraforming tech. is atm in "theory testing" and once more metamaterials and nanothecnology advance in next "few" years, this will be common and cheap for us. Also try investigating more about stuff before writing.
@Metalmaxm FYI. I have collected knowledge thru documentaries and general public media. We've barely started on Nanotechnology. We're not much futher with Metamaterials.
Again, proving my point, we're NOT ready, and we will not be for MANY years.
@DHGameStudios Yes there are a lot of things that you are right about. Remember when Neil Armstrong and other two astronauts from Apollo 11 mission landed on the Moon and when Neil said this beautiful words: It's small step for a man,but giant one for the mankind. And technology for terraforming Mars is here,but question is,who's gonna pay for this.it's so expensive. If some "good" person with lot of many can start paying for terraforming now ,Mars could be blue-green in few hundred years.
@Darko2625 There're two problems with mars: 1. It doesn't have an magnetic field protecting it against dangerous solar waves. 2. Mars has these sort of geyser-things that spew up tons of dust into the atmosphere, making downfall. (dangerous)
And not even Bill Gates would be able to finance such a thing.
@DHGameStudios I know that two things. First in 100-200 years it will be possible to create artificial magnetic field(maybe even now but I'm not sure). Second,this geysers only occur in south polar region of Mars. And they will be less dangerous if they could be covered with water!
so we could end up having another 3 earths kinda by trying to terraform venus/ mars & the moon into earthlike worlds? Mmm... Me thinks lets look after our planet first & all its people lets all fair go before we go heading of into the unknown.
1958peter1958 1 month ago
we cant terraform shit till we build a space elavator
Austinq1998 1 month ago
@Austinq1998 whats a space elevator?
jsharps1000 1 month ago
the moon is hopeless
screwdriver121212 1 month ago
The human race just won't band together... eh??
SpartanKratos001 2 months ago
It is possible to terraform both Venus and Mars and if we were able to change them we could fix anything that may be wrong with the Earth i.e. Global Warming. The moon however would be the greatest challenge think how the moon effects earth and its oceans. Now imagine that except the Earth effecting the moon and any bodies of water. And it may have effects on the Earth magnetic field as well.
RollTideFootball 3 months ago
@RollTideFootball global warming is a natural oscillatory phenomenon, happened hundreds of times exactly the same way during just the past few million years. We do have a contribution to greenhousa gases, but our contribution compares to, say, the effect of the giant bog in syberia exiting the state of permafrost, approx 1 to a 100 during the process of the next century, an there is absolutely nothing you can do about THAT, currently. There is no hippie way of survival either.
decemberthirtytwo 1 month ago
@DuPuieproductions I love the universe, and my planet. I hate religion and any kind of government. I have all my life thought of being a planet not countries... if any one else would get it... but just a few get it... bah, I'll just smoke some bowls for the moment.. :(
HomeRushable 3 months ago
imagine this would be real (now in 2011) just if there was never religon
C00LX100 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there are possible solution perhaps in the far future, we could create a transparent "bubble".
I'm not sure what it would be made out of, perhaps carbon nanotubes, or a clear hydrocarbon self-healing polymer, it will help keep atmosphere for the newly terraformed moon from being eroded.
curingaging00 4 months ago
Comment removed
curingaging00 4 months ago
Comment removed
curingaging00 4 months ago
Comment removed
curingaging00 4 months ago
Comment removed
curingaging00 4 months ago
Terraforming the moon will present it's own challenges, the moon does not have a powerful magnetosphere, and its 1/6th surface gravity allows solar winds to strip it's newly formed atmosphere much faster then Mars, Mars you can continuously replenish, since it would take millions of years for solar winds to strip away, replenishment would easily compete with the atmospheric erosion. However on moon, what I'd like to know is how long would it take for it to have its atmosphere stripped.
curingaging00 4 months ago
i like how there will be many places to swim on mars
5uphiKaner 5 months ago
Why dont take care of Our planet before is too late?
aletool 5 months ago
@aletool Staying on earth is a bad idea if you want to enssure that humanity lives on. Every year we dont do anything the chance of increases of a comet or asteroid hitting the earth and killing us all
gruntlover2 5 months ago
so lets go melt the ice on mars
Terfew 5 months ago
this music is so gay
SereneiBE 6 months ago
@SereneiBE we are here for terraforming no for how is that song
adoskonig 5 months ago
one problem with teraforming mars, is that it has no magnetosphere.
Shockszzbyyous 6 months ago
what this video fails to tell you is that none of these planets has magnetic field to stop their atmosphere being blown away by the suns solar wind FAIL
TheHemsworthboy 6 months ago
@TheHemsworthboy perhaps in the next 10s of thousands of years, humanity would be advanced enough to create some sort of artificial magnetic field to keep shit from being blown off.
Mars would be the first experiment to test that.
If we teraformed Mars but were too lazy to build this artificial magnetic field to protect entire world, Mars would loose most it's atmosphere in only 10s of millions of years.
SereneiBE 6 months ago
We need to Unify as a race instead of colonizing these planets as Americans or Chinese or Russians or w/e.
DuPuieproductions 7 months ago 19
@DuPuieproductions Nice to know someone else realizes the truth of things
TheDeviousSniper 3 months ago
@DuPuieproductions I bet globalization will never been accomplish, which is sad.
SpartanKratos001 2 months ago
@DuPuieproductions I agree
thesomebody3 2 months ago
What I find funny is how if we were to do this, we would probably have to use so much eenergy that we would create an atmosphere on those planets that is in no better condition than that of today's earth
JumpCatmonkey 7 months ago
at least with unlimited atmospheric energy i.e. static lightning. to run all your industrial plants enormous orbital solar potential, and vast amounts of chemical resources with no need to worry about global warming from your industry we could turn venus into the industrial heart of the solar system
Vuaviator 8 months ago
Apparently 99% of Earth's atmosphere was created by life. Some scientists hold the view that introducing basic life forms - ones designed specifically for that planet's environment - on other planets is the only feasible way to ensure terraforming would work.
The process would of course take millions of years.
Robscrob1 8 months ago
shit only mars looks like it has enough land venus looks like it would be full of water
dazjah00 9 months ago
LOVED the presentation! Question: if Venus provides radiation shielding simply by virtue of the atmosphere, wouldn't Mars fans argue that "all" we have to do is cook up enough regolith and change the albedo of Mars to create some atmosphere? (Imagine the sheer ENERGY requirements to do that.) Some imagine releasing gigatons of super-greenhouse gases 17thousand times more powerful than Co2. Who knows what robot terraforming machines of the future might do?
TheEclipsenow 9 months ago
How will the atmosphere be kept on the moon?
arandaspis112 9 months ago
How do you keep the atmosphere on the moon?
arandaspis112 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Terraforming Moon would be bad idea.
SmokNiszczyciel 9 months ago
14 ppl alienformed 14 ppl is now martian ppl
wengneuda13 9 months ago
MOON IS STILL WHITE
wengneuda13 9 months ago
Beautiful. For once on Youtube, the music actually complements --and enhances, the video. Well done! Congrats!
hotboyclarence 10 months ago
i dont get it? on mars is a lot of carbondioxide right? and plants turn that to oxygen right? we only have to put plants on the middle of mars and after a few years we could live on mars, jeez... in my pants lol
siperdellyeer 10 months ago
@siperdellyeer wait though you forget it is rather cold on mars the plants would freeze and die but if there was a way we could warm up mars then we may just be able to live on it it would be difficult to transfer humans though... MAYBE many 100 years forward we will try or succeed in trying
anostrichkilledyou 10 months ago
@anostrichkilledyou i always love it when people say 100 years and then it takes 2 years :D but when they say 2 years it takes 100 years >:(
siperdellyeer 10 months ago
@siperdellyeer: Yes but the atmosphere is not thick enough. I don't think there's *enough* Co2 on Mars, it's not even 1 atmosphere in pressure, so you might convert some of it to oxygen but there would not be enough. That's why in the Kim Stanley Robinson Red/Green/Blue Mars trilogy they spend a lot of time explaining how robot droid rocket ships hurl asteroids into Mars just to thicken the atmosphere a bit.
TheEclipsenow 9 months ago
@TheEclipsenow so if we can make a thicker atmosphere and put some factory's that produce Co2 it would be possible to live on mars right? + NASA found fossils on mars from bacteria, maybe that would mean that it would be easier to terraform mars... we will see over 20 years if something is changed
siperdellyeer 9 months ago
we will never explore galaxy or live at mars. born too early
ZarukaCamoran 1 year ago
@ZarukaCamoran we will have mapped out the human brain and have total brain prosthesis within 50 years
once you can upload consciousness into a more efficient medium than our biology there will be no reason to colonize anything other than a vast number of super computers and back ups floating across space.
Of course if we augment our intelligence infinitely to a godlike sentience, with no biology to provide motivation, we'd be a collective vegetable unless we limited ourselves with simulation.
MaxAC40 1 year ago
If the relentless solar winds eventually blow all that sufuric acid off planet Venus then just maybe we could settle in the polar regions of our sister planet.
WPGS25041941 1 year ago
It would be amazing, we would abandon earth, but ofcoarse if we could terra form we could fix earth
HeartStrikerz 1 year ago 27
@HeartStrikerz Earth's situation is a little bit more complicated... It is not naturally fucked up, but yes synthetically.
DeathScytheBR 8 months ago
@DeathScytheBR Well, Because its synthetically fucked up, Earth will be a bit more recognizible(if we dont terraform) and ... stuff
killer1171100 7 months ago
@HeartStrikerz We can but with modern tech it'll take millons of years
plzwork100 8 months ago
@HeartStrikerz by the next billion years the sun would be 10% brighter, the average temperature would be well over 100 degrees F, i suppose by then we could move earth 5% farther, figure out a economical and technical way to do so.
SereneiBE 6 months ago
@HeartStrikerz it would take more time to fix earth than terraform an other planet....
DevasionX 1 month ago
It would be amazing, we would abandon earth
HeartStrikerz 1 year ago
imagine: about 5 "earth" planets in our galaxy
rapolast 1 year ago
@rapolast imagine all the planets are like EARTH
Matej1the1dinosaur22 11 months ago
gliese 581 and its other planet planets b,c,d, and g away from us sure that the planets orbit around the gliese 581 and its away to its trillion trillion miles away to us its so far i want to go from it all is green to planet of gliese 581 its called superearth or extra solar planets its so ugly planets to glise with super blue i dont like it its other earth family to us sun and its partner star gliese 581 is the same but different colors gliese 581 is red dwarf and sun
wengneuda13 1 year ago
Wouldnt it be easier and faster just to make spacecolonies like those in the Gundam series than to terraform a planet.
Spacefrisian 1 year ago
@Spacefrisian Terraforming is a long term solution that requires no maintenance, gives humans a natural (Earth-like) environment to live in (avoiding possible psychological and physical damage), has much more potential for expansion (unaided), and is entirely self sufficient from the start.
RobLucci3 1 year ago
@PivotDemon548: Better yet, we could have all the planets and send them to Pluto!
CarlosMarti123 1 year ago
pluto is dead
wengneuda13 1 year ago
@wengneuda13 Nope, it's still there. It's just classified as a Dwarf Planet now.
CarlosMarti123 1 year ago
Not to mention we need to concern ourselves with what's going on right here, before looking elsewhere, because before too long, there won't be any resources to do diddly squat.
DreadStorm 1 year ago
Wouldn't it be illogical to attempt to terraform the moon, as it is tidally locked? I can see colonies, but terraforming would be wasteful by half, really. Not to mention it's difficult to create an atmosphere, versus modifying an existing one. I would, if it were plausible, and up to me, start with Mars first. then try to develop a way to do it to Venus. That way we can ship the religious fanatics, criminals and other miscreants to Mars, leaving Earth & Venus to be plentiful and peaceful. heh
DreadStorm 1 year ago
@DreadStorm Or, we could have Earth, Venus AND Mars, and just send all those people to Jupiter. :D
PivotDemon548 1 year ago
@PivotDemon548 LOL Definitely.
DreadStorm 1 year ago
the video would have been great if it weren't for the music
toadsEATbugs 1 year ago
Terraforming venus would be a waste of time for multiple reasons... and I'm not sure the moon would have enough gravity.... maybe but we'd have to replenish it like a mofo...
Mars on the other hand would be (relatively) easy to terraform, not take too long either... and If we survive long enough as a species will be necessary in about 400-500 million years.
Moirera 1 year ago
song imao
littshepkid 1 year ago
Love the idea of making life on other planets but it's so far away my grandchilds, grandchild...grandchild wont see it. but we need to sort out a few 1000's of problems first. first been fuel, if we put as much money into finding a viable source to replace it as we do drilling it and buying it we'd have one by now haha (maybe not but you get my point) as many other problems.
Anyone seen the film Terra? knaff film but great concept and so on.
DeanGetYourWings 1 year ago
and several *trillion dollars
littshepkid 1 year ago
@littshepkid
And that too.
It was included in my 1000's of problems and it will more likely be more than trillion :s
DeanGetYourWings 1 year ago
ZILLions?
littshepkid 1 year ago
We're gonna run out of fuel a long, long, long, long, LONG time before we've successfully terraformed Marrs, and it's not like Mars is gonna have any fuel for us.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios It's not need to much fuel. Do you heard for VASIMR rocket propulsion? Or cryogenic propulsion?
Darko2625 1 year ago
And one more thing,terraforming is simple as 2+2. Don't make it complicated.,study things and you will see :)
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Darko2625 /facepalm, No, but it is DAMN expensive. Transporting people from Earth to Mars Alone would not be worth the trip. Plus, who would want to live on Mars? Some scientist might, but really? It would be like Antarktika, only a thousand times worse.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
And humanity maybe will give the lots of money for this but after all will be done,humanity will be so proud of Blue-Green Mars And people will realize that terraformed Mars wasn't wasted time and money.
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Darko2625 Seriously, Humans do not work like that, we're Greedy. We do not care about the majority. And I still say that we Do not simply have the technology, it will take Many Centuries before we're even close. The only thing I think that has a chance of this is Quantum Physics (teleportation Ect.). A Constant Portal between Earth and Mars might make it worth it, but else I don't really see it.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios You need to more study quantum physics. if you want to teleportate,you need to be ripped in atoms and if you are ripped in atoms you will be dead. This is science fiction,but terraforming is science fact.
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Darko2625 How can you be so sure we won't find a way of fixing this and how do you know that the soul won't follow the body?
But you're right, it would take a Very long time.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios Now when you talking about soul,you probably realize that this guy who financed terraforming will be there again :)
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Darko2625 Okay, let's say it is possible, but what would we gain from it?
More space for our growing population, crops... Aaaand... Dirt?
I don't really think it would be much worth for a guy who died 200 years ago financing this thing.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
Who are 13 morons who dislike this?
Darko2625 1 year ago
0:14 moon looks like a death star (im no star wars fan)
nonody1 1 year ago
I think people should look more into setting up bases in the upper atmosphere of Venus. Perhaps from there terraforming would be easy. Since the atmosphere is so thick, it would be easier to stay afloat in an airship.
MrC0MPUT3R 1 year ago
@MrC0MPUT3R thats the problem they would have to make floating city's we dont have that technology yet and a airship needs somebody and something to keep it in the air like gaz or energy and using a machine to do that kinda job would take forever
NOKAZAN 1 year ago
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr i thought this was spore
TheEveryoneFAILS 1 year ago
venus is still active but it is too hot. the moon has no atmosphere and is to small. in the summer mars can get as warm as 20 degrees near the equator. so i pick mars best candidate for this process.
crib1981 1 year ago
@crib1981 actually the highest record mars has gotten was 70 degrees, and Venus's runaway Greenhouse effect is the cause of the heat so if we can stabilize or possibly get rid of it , Mars and Venus would both be eligible for life
kbabyco 1 year ago
This is the first video that I've watched with that song that isn't in any way depressing :D
XxD1EAN0TH3RD4YxX 1 year ago
nice song
littshepkid 1 year ago
Your have the temperatures wrong. And that's not a true picture of Venus.
An3ggPlant1 1 year ago
@An3ggPlant1 Possible picture of Venus without atmosphere :)
Darko2625 1 year ago
your going to need alot of A/C to terraform Venus lol
Georgeqaws 1 year ago 26
@Georgeqaws well and something to deal with the fact that Venus's atmosphere is basically a sulfuric acid compound. :D
emlmm88 6 months ago
all these pictures are off wikipedia, great video. terraforming needs to be more well known.
Nazoropazable 1 year ago
Atmopshere plays a big role... it protects the planet and make it suitable for life. and Mars seem nice ^_^...
vanchunyin 1 year ago
Id say Mars is the only one possible to terraform. no point in moon because its right next to us and to small. and Venus well..... you would be dead :L
23Arshaviin 1 year ago
@23Arshaviin I guess you COuld terraform it but our sun is too small and/or is too far away :/
ammefan 1 year ago
And what will happen to the earth?? DUMP SITE?
Vikzor30 1 year ago
mars atmospshere is amazingly similar to earth's but does it has enough oxygen to breath wwithoug masks ?
CrownChanel 1 year ago
@CrownChanel No. Plus there's something about its pressure that would make you die if you DID take off your mask.
notessimodude 1 year ago
@CrownChanel Planting Plants!=D
Salien1999 1 year ago
@CrownChanel The atmosphere is too small and we can't build an atmosphere there because it would get blown away by the solar wind. And if we got the atmosphere thick enough we would plant plants to make the oxygen.
Salien1999 1 year ago
@Salien1999 We could build domes on the planet while it's being terraformed although we don't have the technology for it YET. And we would have to wait thousands of years for it to be terraformed though.
Donutz0wnu 1 year ago
@Donutz0wnu Apparently you don't understand. The atmosphere is NEEDED I'm not saying we won't live long enough to build one, I'm saying that we can't. There's no magnetic field to protect the atmosphere, so it would be blown off the planet.
Salien1999 1 year ago
@Salien1999 That may be so but it still doesn't rule out domes being built.
Donutz0wnu 1 year ago
It would be FAR cheaper to research ideas for space warp and ideas we haven't even thought of yet to get to other planets all most instantly and colonize those planets.
Ships at light speed is no good,..it's painfully slow compared to the size of the universe,..just to get to the nearest star is 4.5 years. We need an alternative.
Illuminati10101 1 year ago
Think about this. How long would the population put up with the cost of such a task.
Especially for something that will not affect them in their life time.
Interest would be lost quickly, look how fast the population lost interest in the Apollo program.
It would cost pretty much every person on earth their paycheck for life to cover the cost. To put JUST Armstrong in space it cost his body weight in gold.
Illuminati10101 1 year ago
@Illuminati10101 but If we can set up a permenant base or what ever you want to call it on the moon we could harvest the helium 3 which is used in nuclear fusion thus solving the worlds energy shortage and making it alot cheaper in the long run
timelordcreation 1 year ago
Mars can never be terraformed.
1. No real moon to create tides.(The 2 so called moons Mars has are more like big rocks and far too small to stabilize Mars axes )
2.Planet is too small to hold onto an atmosphere or water.
3.If the polar ice caps were melted for terra forming the planet would not be able to cool itself.
4.No molten iron core,no magnetic field...so you will roast under radiation.
End of story.
Illuminati10101 1 year ago
@Illuminati10101 These are the reasons why Mars is not naturally habitable. However, we can re-engineer the planet to fit our needs. The technologies to do this aren't there yet, but there is reason to believe we'll have the means by the end of this century if not sooner.
AuxentiusZ 1 year ago
@AuxentiusZ Technology is there,but it will be so damn expensive. Who's gonna pay for it?
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Illuminati10101 Mars once did have an atmosphere and water, it has been proven. But it has vicious winds as such that violently have destroyed the water and atmosphere.
benp2207 1 year ago
@benp2207 I'm aware that Mars once had an atmosphere, it still does actually but mostly Carbon Dioxide. We need air which is like 78% Nitrogen and 21% oxygen with traces of mixed gasses like Carbon. How engineers plan on getting the right balance of gasses and maintaining them is beyond me. We cannot survive on oxygen or Nitrogen alone,.It's a mixture.
All these hurdles doesn't make it feasible, the cost would be too great.
Illuminati10101 1 year ago
@Illuminati10101 1) Mars already had liquid water on surface. There was seas and oceans on surface.
2) Planet is not to small. Again,there already was water,and it can hold enough atmosphere for life.
3) Mars have seasons like Earth,seasons will maintain balance on planet.
4) Ever heard for artificial magnetic field or ozone layer?
Darko2625 1 year ago
the moon can't support an atmosphere due to its low gravity, so the air would just escape into space
commandplay 1 year ago
@commandplay that's the point of terraforming. If we can make venus habitable, we make pluto habitable.
RuleTwilightPrincess 1 year ago
@RuleTwilightPrincess Pluto? What you talking about. Pluto is ball of frozen gas,it's completely wasteland. Maybe colony can be built on Pluto,but terraforming...never! Study the things,then teach others!
Darko2625 1 year ago
@commandplay The moon cannot support an atmosphere for long periods of times because of this, but if we continually create the atmosphere it wouldn't be a problem. Remember these places are dead for a reason; the influence of human engineering however could solve these problems left us by nature.
AuxentiusZ 1 year ago
bitch
sasuke5626 1 year ago
i like this song
sasuke5626 1 year ago
what wonderfull worlds :D ohja i love this ... i just love it <333333
KingWilliamMB 1 year ago
for the moon it is not possible to terraform it but we could build manmade stations and facilities
tufnaman 1 year ago
the moon couldn't even support an atmosphere. not enough gravity.
TheAttackRat 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
MrAndersohn 1 year ago
Luna's gained distance from Earth caused tidle forces to weaken too much in which it could not sustain volcanic activity to produce and sustain an atmosphere. For Mars, if it had one or more moons it could have slowed the cooling down enough for Mars to still have volcanic activity which would have sustained a dense atmosphere to trap enough heat to keep water in liquid state, if the moons stay close to Mars to sustain warmth, they could have sustained a dense atmosphere and give birth to life.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
This is a beautiful video. Venus, Earth, Earth's one single moon "Luna" in it's Earthian moon system, and Mars, are all in the habital temperature zone. It's sad that only one body out of 4 ended up with the proper characteristics to give birth to life. I think Venus formed a rotatation speed that's to slow (about 58 Earth days just to go from sunrise to sunset) and got too hot on the daytime side causing it's water to turn to gas faster than it turns back to liquid through precipitation.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
@EarthianLifeForm Mars has two known moons.
Most scientists believe that Mars's core cooled down faster than Terra's because Mars is much smaller. Therefore much of the liquid iron in the Martian core solidified and stopped spinning, causing the Martian magnetic field to disappear. This allows solar winds to gradually strip away the ionized upper atmosphere of Mars.
iOnlySignIn 1 year ago
@iOnlySignIn But these two moons orbiting Mars are not "true" moons they're two small astroids that got caught by Mars' gravity. Real moons are sphere shaped worlds orbiting a planet like Luna, IO, Europa, Charon, Enceledus, Miranda ext. If we can't concider Pluto, Makemake, Eries, ect. planets then how can an astroid be concidered a moon? Mars may have cooled faster because of it's smaller size but tidle heating from moons would keep each other internally hot.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
we cant terraform the moon, but i wish it were possible
wiseye61 1 year ago
@wiseye61 We can terraform Earth's moon "Luna" if we can find a way to cause Luna's internal temperature to rise. This will cause internal pressure to rise and reactivate Luna's volcanoes which can help bring back a Lunar atmosphere. This may also cause Luna to develope it's own magnetic field as well. One way this can be done is to bring it back much closer to Earth so it can receive tidle heating, though that would be a very difficult task, but would not say it's impossible.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
@EarthianLifeForm
the moon doesn't have sufficient mass to hold its own atmosphere, and it might disrupt its unique balance with earth if you were to increase it's mass by smashing asteroids onto it.
we can still increase mars by smashing asteroids onto it though :]
wiseye61 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wiseye61 Luna has more than enough gravity to hold an atmosphere. The problem is that it's volcanoes have not erupted in so long, that the Lunar atmosphere has been long gone. If Luna stayed much closer to Earth, the Earthian gravitational pull along with Luna's would cause permanent tidle heating (as long as it stays in place) and may have ended up being a world thriving with life.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wiseye61 Venus has about 11% less gravity than Earth but still holds an atmosphere 90 times denser than Earth's. Mars lost volcanic activity a very long time ago or has it but millions of years apart, has 37% gravity and still has enough atmosphere left that our ships need heat shield tiles or they would burn up entering Mars' atmosphere. Uranus has 10% less gravity but still ended up becoming a gas giant. Titan has less gravity than Luna but has an atmosphere more than double of Earth's.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wiseye61 Also Pluto with between 6% and 7% of Earth's gravity and less than half of Luna's gravity is believed to have a thin atmosphere. When New Horizons arrives to Pluto we may possibly end up discovering that the Plutonian atmosphere is much denser than we thought, maybe even very close to being as dense as the Earthian atmosphere.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
@EarthianLifeForm Yea, we don't want to screw with our moon. Provided, it'd be lovely, and nay, 'tis not impossible to terraform the moon I bet, I just don't think there's a way to do it without causing negative impacts for earth unless we give the entire moon a biodome.
SpadesNeil 1 year ago
not to mention that we need strong magnetic fields to keep said atmosphere....
Gregourii 1 year ago
@Gregourii In the long term, yes, but the atmosphere would remain life supporting for a million years or so. It's a problem, but not an immediate "solve it or it won't work" problem.
starsquid 1 year ago
here's what you do for mars, add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, causing a green house effect, and raising the temperature melting the ice caps, then you plant trees where the water is, which eats up the extra carbon dioxide, and naturally adds oxygen to the atmosphere. After about 100 years it should be inhabitable.
miniwars123 1 year ago
drastically. So in the first place its not about reducing air pressure etc. If you would approuc terraforming that way it would be "mopping with the tap opening" (which "previous text" is a saying in my language, not sure if its a saying in english aswell, but you probably know the drift of that saying.
So first we need to make venus spinning more rapidly. What a much bigger challenge then actualy reducing pressure that is.
Armigo91 1 year ago
biggest problem about venus is that it barely spins. To make a eco climate similar to eath we need to make it rotate. Right now its a boiler on one side creating severe climates and winds. Therefore (apart from the dense atmosphere) it doesnt matter if your on the nightside or not. in 10hours the air that has located on the suns side has blown to the night side and in 10 more hours returned to the day sight of venus. if it rotated similar to earth (24hours per rotation) the climate would change
Armigo91 1 year ago
@Armigo91 Finally someone has thought of the most probable reason Venus failed to be a world thriving with life. It is so obvious that it has to do with rotation. Both Venus and Mars are within the habitable temperature zone. If you rotate a marshmellow over a fire too slowly it will catch on fire, if you increased the distance a little to mimic that of Earth or Mars, it would still catch on fire, it would just take a little longer. Even Mercury's poles don't go beyond habitable temperatures.
EarthianLifeForm 1 year ago
Great, after the moon is terraformed, Earth will truly get mooned.
Salien1999 1 year ago
we true hunters want a new rock.. and some dinosaures ..muahhah
MrSh1nob1 1 year ago 2
lol we could terraform mars, and it would show those creationists up.
Science FTW, religion for the loose
conman2317 1 year ago
it would be so cool to look up at the moon at night and see a big blue world knowing that there are orgonisms on it
loltweet3 1 year ago
all mars needs is a molten core and a thicker atmosphere and BAM! you got a copy of earth (H2O and oxegen is in the ice caps).
jdbubby96 1 year ago
Hi, the resources are out there ,but we don't have the knowledge.. or the will to do it.
shotbakerrr 1 year ago
well at least have a collony on mars in the next fifty years
XxslimchickenxX 1 year ago
This wouldnt be easy.
The planets have different tempatures, They'll have to change it constantly.
I say its possible if we did it on mars or the moon, But I cant imagine it on other planets
SuperSnorlaxForums 1 year ago
Terraforming is a little far, but can install kind of big tent and reduce the proportion of azote to fit the need in oxygen, and start extracting with more inteligent and competent tools, machinery and vehicle
like the most sick industrial and spacial age ever imagined that have production reduced to almost nothing on large bulk.. and that start, but later with Ai we can kind of teleport humanity on anything that a machine orbit and land and that is also already terraformed..)
poweressen 1 year ago
Comment removed
poweressen 1 year ago
If we developed some sort of teleportation (Disapearing from a place, and then reapearing in another) technology, then I would start believing in space a lot more.
However, transmitting matter can't exactly be cheap in resources, but it would without a doubt change everything. So guys, if you wanna be a scientist and wanna make space "Explorable", do Quantum Physics, it's the future! -From what I heard.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
Sorry guys, but space just don't pay off at all. The amount of money, resources and time is all impossible.
1. Space explorations doesn't give any profit
2. The amount of money/resources needed just to get a space station in orbit around the earth is so damn high, that it would be cheaper (even in the long run) to just do it the old fashioned way.
3. Even if we successfully Terraformed a planet, what then? Nothing, because moving people to populate it would also cost tons of resources/money.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios You are right, but if there are some resurces like dimonds or metals or even gold then it gives lots of profit.
ggoggelis 1 year ago
@ggoggelis BUt nothing compared to the resources used to get there in the first place, and bringing them back to Earth.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios And how the hell you know that? How many valuable items are in asteroids or other planets? Who knows... And what you think,what you will do when you suck up all resources of fossil fuels from Earth? Space exploration and colonization is our destiny,if humanity just stick to the Earth,we are dead. Period.
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Darko2625 It's pretty damn common knowledge, we simply do NOT have the technology to do it, and it would take centuries to figure out atleast some of the small things they do in science fictions. It costs Millions to launch a rocket for Mars with 5 people onboard, who can only stay there for a day or so. Colonies would never be able to be independent, they would constantly need raw materials from Earth, which would again cost MORE money....
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios Terraforming tech. is atm in "theory testing" and once more metamaterials and nanothecnology advance in next "few" years, this will be common and cheap for us. Also try investigating more about stuff before writing.
Metalmaxm 1 year ago
@Metalmaxm FYI. I have collected knowledge thru documentaries and general public media. We've barely started on Nanotechnology. We're not much futher with Metamaterials.
Again, proving my point, we're NOT ready, and we will not be for MANY years.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@Darko2625 I'd actually say it's more expensive (in money and resources) to do space exploration with our current technology than going green.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@Darko2625 Plus, there are other forms of energy on Earth, and if they're not good enough, then we wait till we have the technology (+1000 years)
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@Darko2625 We can't even make it out of our own damn Solarsystem.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios Yes there are a lot of things that you are right about. Remember when Neil Armstrong and other two astronauts from Apollo 11 mission landed on the Moon and when Neil said this beautiful words: It's small step for a man,but giant one for the mankind. And technology for terraforming Mars is here,but question is,who's gonna pay for this.it's so expensive. If some "good" person with lot of many can start paying for terraforming now ,Mars could be blue-green in few hundred years.
Darko2625 1 year ago
@Darko2625 There're two problems with mars: 1. It doesn't have an magnetic field protecting it against dangerous solar waves. 2. Mars has these sort of geyser-things that spew up tons of dust into the atmosphere, making downfall. (dangerous)
And not even Bill Gates would be able to finance such a thing.
DHGameStudios 1 year ago
@DHGameStudios I know that two things. First in 100-200 years it will be possible to create artificial magnetic field(maybe even now but I'm not sure). Second,this geysers only occur in south polar region of Mars. And they will be less dangerous if they could be covered with water!
Darko2625 1 year ago