Without blood it looks unrealistic and childish. I'm not some violent monger who loves to see that stuff, it just looks better. Then again it is Nintendo..
Blood is overrated, FPS's with it exaggerate it way too much anyway, it just shows how sick our culture is becoming. Thank goodness for Nintendo or else there would only be violent blood spewing M rated games.
So you think that you can't have a good game if it doesn't have blood nor multilayer, There are countless of games that were rated E or T and they badly beat any Mature game?
You're just like my friend, if a movie or game or whatever doens't blood or cursing and such, he won't even bother taking a look. All your excuses are just plain childish and stupid.
Yeah actually I do think that a game centered around GUNS and SWORDFIGHTING needs blood, and multiplayer. Without those I feel it will lack in game play.
Does Boom Blox need explosions of guts whenever a tower topples? No, but this type of game, a game based on murdering people, needs to have the elements of a violent game. The ONLY reason there is no blood is so they can rate it teen; they want to sell more of the game while expecting to ride on the laurels of the first.
I agree with the multiplayer part, but I don't think its necessary to have blood and gore. Its superficial. It has no effect on the actual gameplay. Its effect is more in the setting, and blood in certain cases may enhance or detract from the world they created. Violence doesn't necessarily call for lots of blood. The Good the Bad and the Ugly (which this game's main character was inspired from) doesn't have much gore. Its more *BANG* *Clutches chest* *dead*. Not shooting blood everywhere.
really good games doesnt need multiplayer and a lot of triple A titles wont make sense with multiplayer. metroid prime 3 and super mario galaxy didnt have multiplayer but looks at their success, same with zelda..lol zelda with multiplayer?? and the games that are comming out are good without multiplayer super mario galaxy 2, metroid other m, pikmin3, new zelda, redsteel2, no more heroes 2, and super mario bros wii.
ya and the same with assassins creed, it had no live capabilities but still totaly epic game! and the good thing is that these games are so good WITH OUT live or miltiplayer, but the creators are still making it possible for multiplayer and live, now that is what an epic game truly is, not just some game where the live gameplay is pretty good.
True with those types of games, but a first person shooter, with a linear story line, needs multiplayer to produce replayablity.
Those games mentioned above have such interactive worlds that the multiplayer feeling is almost replaced by NPCs; no multiplayer needed. But in this type of game with only cut scenes and NPCs that you kill (based of the first game), you need something to bring you back; to say "im going to play red steel 2 again" after a year. You see what im saying?
Well, I've seen actual gameplay footage, and it seems that it finally is one on one tracking of the Wii remote. Will be interesting to see if they use it effectively. The first game was a definite let-down.
super trailer sad that we dont have games with that quality yet,.
azaxYyYyY 1 year ago
at super mario galaxy they said
"the game puches the wii to it´s limits"
they might say the same at reident of evel darkside cronicles, this game and super mario galaxy 2 which look WAAAAY BETTER
adolf512 2 years ago
I hope it's an improvement over the first
SimonRivas 2 years ago
Without blood it looks unrealistic and childish. I'm not some violent monger who loves to see that stuff, it just looks better. Then again it is Nintendo..
noyan000 2 years ago
its not nintendo, this is developer decision not nintendo
Jonki408 1 year ago
Blood is overrated, FPS's with it exaggerate it way too much anyway, it just shows how sick our culture is becoming. Thank goodness for Nintendo or else there would only be violent blood spewing M rated games.
kuhlguy 2 years ago 2
OMFG SO FUCKING EPIC
xlostxmemoryx01x 2 years ago 2
Damn, the graphics look great! With Wii MotionPlus the controls will be perfect!! Finally, they are showing the true power of the Wii!!!!!
pmmers 2 years ago
In case you haven't notice, the graphics look different than in this trailer. It's not the actually game play.
dinmagic 2 years ago
Doesn't matter. Still gonna buy it :-D
pmmers 2 years ago
if any of you people had bothered to read previews of this you will discover that the controls are incredible
they say it doesnt even compare to the first game in that this one has unprecedented control with wm+
and its not a game geared towards multiplayer
its more along the lines of metroid where you're all on your own
damnumah 2 years ago
i like cartoony style. hope the real games looks and plays as good as trailer.
RabbidMonkee 2 years ago
Did I mention it's rated TEEN, with no blood? Yeah, what a waste.
And there is no way in hell it will play this good or easily. Sorry I wish I could get excited about this too.
TheSunGodRa 2 years ago
whats wrong with teen? i couldnt get it if it was rated M!!!
gameboy100894 2 years ago
Its not going to be memorable if the enemies just fall down now is it?
TheSunGodRa 2 years ago
007 goldeneye was memorable wasnt it?
gameboy100894 2 years ago
So you think that you can't have a good game if it doesn't have blood nor multilayer, There are countless of games that were rated E or T and they badly beat any Mature game?
You're just like my friend, if a movie or game or whatever doens't blood or cursing and such, he won't even bother taking a look. All your excuses are just plain childish and stupid.
dinmagic 2 years ago
Yeah actually I do think that a game centered around GUNS and SWORDFIGHTING needs blood, and multiplayer. Without those I feel it will lack in game play.
Does Boom Blox need explosions of guts whenever a tower topples? No, but this type of game, a game based on murdering people, needs to have the elements of a violent game. The ONLY reason there is no blood is so they can rate it teen; they want to sell more of the game while expecting to ride on the laurels of the first.
TheSunGodRa 2 years ago
I agree with the multiplayer part, but I don't think its necessary to have blood and gore. Its superficial. It has no effect on the actual gameplay. Its effect is more in the setting, and blood in certain cases may enhance or detract from the world they created. Violence doesn't necessarily call for lots of blood. The Good the Bad and the Ugly (which this game's main character was inspired from) doesn't have much gore. Its more *BANG* *Clutches chest* *dead*. Not shooting blood everywhere.
gassygunslinger 2 years ago
Look at Bioshock and the Metroid Prime series.Those are both great hits.Yet neither has multiplayer.Although this game could use a little blood....
mustachio31 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It has NO MULTIPLAYER, you can hold me to this. = FAIL NO MATTER HOW GOOD IT LOOKS.
TheSunGodRa 2 years ago
really good games doesnt need multiplayer and a lot of triple A titles wont make sense with multiplayer. metroid prime 3 and super mario galaxy didnt have multiplayer but looks at their success, same with zelda..lol zelda with multiplayer?? and the games that are comming out are good without multiplayer super mario galaxy 2, metroid other m, pikmin3, new zelda, redsteel2, no more heroes 2, and super mario bros wii.
bigdaddyfranchise 2 years ago
ya and the same with assassins creed, it had no live capabilities but still totaly epic game! and the good thing is that these games are so good WITH OUT live or miltiplayer, but the creators are still making it possible for multiplayer and live, now that is what an epic game truly is, not just some game where the live gameplay is pretty good.
qasim2000218 2 years ago
True with those types of games, but a first person shooter, with a linear story line, needs multiplayer to produce replayablity.
Those games mentioned above have such interactive worlds that the multiplayer feeling is almost replaced by NPCs; no multiplayer needed. But in this type of game with only cut scenes and NPCs that you kill (based of the first game), you need something to bring you back; to say "im going to play red steel 2 again" after a year. You see what im saying?
TheSunGodRa 2 years ago
yea i so get you.
qasim2000218 2 years ago 2
we hae call of duty 5 for that
xibbox 2 years ago
are those actual graphics?
jellytroid 2 years ago
yeah... "red" steel Loooots of red -_-
polarlarve 2 years ago
looks great and if Wii Motion Plus is that great as nintendo says its going to kick ass!!!!!
1linkgb1 2 years ago 2
si c comme sa dans le jeu , ce sera du bon
niconintendo 2 years ago
looks like bullshit hype to me.
Anyone remember the trailerr for the first red steel?
it was a complete exaggeration of the actual game.
but still, nice trailer
dexsmith99 2 years ago
Well, I've seen actual gameplay footage, and it seems that it finally is one on one tracking of the Wii remote. Will be interesting to see if they use it effectively. The first game was a definite let-down.
gassygunslinger 2 years ago
i just shat myself....HOLY SHIT!
DarthRoy1292 2 years ago
damned! O.o good game
HoweHomie 2 years ago