Principles That Makes My Engine SUPER-EFFICIENT ( Part 4 , please read below)

[calcdn]

I'm amazed at how many idiots are out there, trying to look smart....replying with their comments that are as bad as the author.

any thing that has to STOP and go the other direction is Not efficient. every showing part one to part three proves that this is a play thing of someones imagination not reality.

[died4hislove]

Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( PART 3)

[died4hislove]

Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( PART 3)

[sheepborg]

Ideally the concept of applying force in a linear direction would be more efficient. However, the force that is lost simply by adding your geartrain more than cancels out the gained efficiency. Consider that you can lose a good bit of horsepower in a drivetrain alone, just by going through a few gears and bearings of ideal shape, and then you realize the shear loss of the sliding and gears.

Good idea in an ideal world, but you lose to much in the gears and sliders no matter what.

[grandexandi]

stop the music. you have to speak.

[MrRallyArt]

You make a good point in eliminating the forces on the side of the cilinder and eliminating the crankshaft bearings. But you create friction forces on the wall of the oscillating centerpiece. It would be nice to know if this design is more efficient.

Did you try to make a working model for performance evaluating?

[pjaxy]

@MrRallyArt friction on the oscillating centerpiece is the biggest hurdle this engine has to solve