@Fartsurmonde The UK supported the tyrants of Louis XVI, Alexander I, Nicholas II and Leopold II. The UK oppressed and tyrannized the Scottish, Irish, Indians, Boers, Zulu, Afrikaners, Chinese and many others. While the UK cleaned up a bit with their actions against the Fascist regimes of Europe it's hands are far from clean.
I'd really much rather listen to the French version, with English subtitles. After a couple viewings and knowing what is being said, then I'd just turn the subtitles off and watch it in the original French version. How else? - But I think the only version like that is made in Canada. Damn. Why an English speaking version with French subtitles?
France should investigate its own "dirty and bloody history instead of other nations France was responsible for the deaths of 45,000 people in Algeria in 1945 and for the massacre of up to 800,000 people in Rwanda in 1994.PLEASE CHECK WIKIPEDIA
Fuck those English Parlamentary filthy rats. Nothing but the USA of two centuries ago. Trading gold for german and russian blood, they had a pathetic army in general and could not even dream of beating the Grand Armee on their own. Pretty much like Germany on both world wars, more than ten countries sweting their balls out to overpower a single powerful enemy. The revolutionary ideias of back then could have changed this shitty world where money is way more valued than lives. Vive L'Empereur!
@febertotti -But you ask the impossible , as history has shown the English have faced all the tyrants of Europe Napoleon, Hitler,Mussolini, Franco and have defeated them all -it is the will of God and God is an Englishman :)
@SenhorPesoPesado dont ever compare the two. without napoleon europe would still be ruled by the holy roman empire and he gave jews citizenship unheard of the times. i admit he did lust for power but he also changed military tactics and wasnt a bad man. hitler was in it for genocide napoleon for GLORY
@seminoleboy96 Well, i tought very bad, i didn't studied the history of napoleon, But he killed portuguese, lot of portuguese, and I'm angry about it, but thinking by the good side, he did good to europe :D
Napoleon granted religious freedom to the Jews, Hitler killed them. Napoleon felt his Civil Code was his greatest work, Hitler felt cleansing the world of "sub-races" was his greatest work. Napoleon on his own was a military genius; Hitler was not. Napoleon loved his family, Hitler despised his. Napoleon inherited France's wars, Hitler initiated his wars. But, Hitler was much worse then Napoleon.
ancien para je suis aujourd hui policier, j'aime mon pays , je suis triste aujourd hui , car je me demande où sont passés de tels hommes de tels soldats de tels generaux...de tels patriotes.nous ne sommes même plus l'ombre de nous même.
This scence is much better in Waterloo with Rod Steiger.
Out oif books I read not Ney gave directly the command to fire......but an officer in the 1st line..and Napoleon didnt blame hime later for this command
Nous avons assassiné des millions de paysans illettrés et démunis, de pauvres noirs, de pauvres arabes que nous avons rendus en esclavage, pour mieux exploiter leurs richesses naturelles.
Nous avons du sang plein les mains et nous donnons des leçons à tout le monde.
Nous avons agressé du temps des Louis et des Bonaparte nos voisins, dont les Allemands et les Italiens, et le pire, nous jouons les victimes.
@MRjlouis3131 mais tu es vraiment un raciste ! C'est pas possible.
nous sommes blancs depuis des générations. mais MOI monsieur, je suis assez courageux pour affronter tout le mal que nous avons fait sur la terre, abusant des plus faibles et les réduisant pour plusieurs en esclavage.
Mois toi, tu as tes lunettes roses, et en plus tu fais l'autruche.
Aies le courage de demander pardon aux autres nations pour nos crimes abominables.
Ne te voiles pas la face comme le suggère Sarkozy.
@mrktyb arrête un peu ... on est les seuls à avoir fait du mal sur terre? Ce n'est pas nous qui avons inventé les camps de concentration (mais les anglais en afrique du sud), ce n'est pas nous qui vons inventé les camps d'extermination (mais les allemands) ce n'est pas nous qui avons exterminé les amériendiens (encore les rosebeef)... pour une nation comme pour un homme la vie est un combat... Il n'y a que les français pour s'autoflagélé comme ça...
@gyrofoam1 I like how you failed to answer my question, probably because you have no idea who any of these people actually were, and tried to cover it up with an incredibly old pun.
@gyrofoam1 Why should he have shot him? Napoleon was a far better leader than Louis XVIII, he had the army's support, if only the English and Prussians had stayed out of it (or if the ground at Waterloo had been dry) history would have been much different.
@Bernstein1917 Agree. Napoleon was a legend. And this scene just goes to show how great he was, in that an entire army of men sent to kill him refused to shoot him and instead joined him. Not a single man out of all of them. That is just amazing.
@Bernstein1917 -But you ask the impossible , as history has shown the English have faced all the tyrants of Europe Napoleon, Hitler,Mussolini, Franco and have defeated them all -it is the will of God and God is an Englishman :)
@Fartsurmonde Napoleon was not a tyrant because he was elected by the French people to become emperor, in a democratic vote (even if only rich people could vote). But it was the prelude to future elections. The King of England was a tyrant because he inherited the crown without being elected by the people of Britain, unlike the French sovereign.
@manfred898 -Very different -was not enslaving them -was pulling them into the modern world.Napoleon on the other hand was attacking equally developed countries and trying to enslave them like Hitler tried in the 20th Century.
That's a very imperialistic thing to say. Millions died from engineered famines, revolts were violently surpressed, native peoples became third class citizens in their own land, by any other ruling that's enslaving. it's supremely arrogant to suggest that countries can't develop in their own way. If that was the case it would have been better for China to rule Europe up until the ( European ) renaissance.
@manfred898 -Yes it may not be "PC" and sound imperialistic nowadays but it is never the less true.The British Empire was no different from the other european empires of the time but it did have a aim not so prevalent in many of those other empires and that it is it aimed to educate the people it conquered to British standards and virtues.So hospitals were set up in deepest India and Africa to British standards yes the "natives" were not allowed necessarily to progress to top jobs
@manfred898 But, the seeds of the standards was set so later those countries were in a position to have a similar standard of medical service. Kenya and Nigeria are now throwing that in turmoil in recent years but they are independent they can not blame anyone but themselves.India has very good hospitals which could be improved upon if they stopped wasting money on space exploration.Education helped them too and India was brought together by the use of English as second language.
@manfred898 -Also look at America,Canada, New Zealand, Australia and South Africa all vibrant successful countries -if they had not been part of the British Empire they would have probably been open to eventual conquering by China,Russia or perhaps even North Korea! -but because they were dragged up to the standards of the UK they are too strong to be taken over through War -THAT IS FREEDOM
THAT IS NONSENSE :) In the countries you mention, the indigenous populations were at best marginalised, and they still are to a large degree. As for 'open to invasion by China, Russia, or, ahem, North Korea ;), that is fanciful bullshit, you don't really know what you're taking about do you? Read a little more, you're arrogance borders on racism.
@manfred898 -No Manfred, my teenage years are long behind me, but I received an education that is unsurpassed -the education of life and the of reading good books instead of Wikipedia which I suspect is your main sponsor for your lacking education :)
@manfred898 Britain opposed Franco as they opposed all the other tyrants -there were many Britons who joined the International fighters including George Orwell who wrote "1984" as a warning of future dangers in a dictatorship,
Haha! Those fighters were independant citizens, they were nothing to do with British policy, infact they were mainly Socialist in ideology, certainly not what the British regime would have encouraged :) If you'd actually read 'Homage to Catalonia', you'd understand. Desperate pleas by the Spanish Republican government for assistance from the European democracies of Britain and France fell, overwhelmingly, on deaf ears....
.....British policy of the time was all about appeasing facists in Europe, or have you conveniently forgotten that fact? You're really grasping at straws! :)
@manfred898 -No you are grabbing at straws as if you really read history you would know Britain rejected the peace offer from Hitler and went to War -the appeasers were ignored.Please get an education and stop relying on movies,TV and Wiki for your educational information which is made up drivel.
@Fartsurmonde -marginalised indigenous people?-British did not do that the new Americans and Australians did that.The British in India made the "sooty" ritual of those indigenous people outlawed so that the wives of the dead were no longer thrown ALIVE on the funeral pyre husband.They also tried to breakdown the "caste" system in India which kept sections of the population in the gutter through just been born in the wrong "caste" Sorry mate it is you who need to do some reading.
Whilst at the same time hanging children for stealing bread, and subjugating the Irish for being a different religion; and allowing more than a million Irish to die of starvation to protect their economic system. They did that in India too, even in the 1940s ;) Fine arbitrators of moral code I must say ;)
@manfred898 -Britain was not the only country who punished children in such a way but at least we did not guillotine them as they did in France. It is a common myth which is projected by the Irish that Britain starved them, when in fact it was because as it does today it rained and flooded wiping out two harvests that caused the famine. In India it was not caused by the British either,any starvation problems were there way before the British landed there.So what you carping on about
I thought you'd gone ;) You still haven't explained to me how the English defeated Franco, we'll just ignore that one will we? ;) Of course Britain wasn't the only country to do that, though I draw no distinction between hanging and the guillotine, I'd rather be guillotined to be honest. My point is, you can't really comment on barbaric practice peculiar to some Indian tribes of the period......
....as justification for their subjugation when equally barbaric practices existed in England. As for the famines of Ireland, again, read proper history, not just your jingoistic back slapping English sort, the fact is, a blight struck the potato crops ( a virulent fungus ) spread by the wind, (where you got this flood nonsense I don't know!) and the English did virtually nothing to relieve it, they let 1 million of who were supposedly their own citizens starve....
......even though they were the wealthiest society on earth, simply to protect their markets. Enlightened enough to spread moral code to India? Do you think? As for the Bengal famines of the 1940s, Basically England occupied a hugely material rich land, yet did nothing to alleviate a famine that killed millions, again for economic reasons, that was your great man Winston Churchill...
@Fartsurmonde ....Moral bench marks? Hardly. You skim history my friend, to suit your Nationalistic ideals, to make you feel somehow superior through a chance of birth, you don't really grasp it at all.
@Fartsurmonde -marginalised indigenous people?-British did not do that the new Americans and Australians did that.The British in India made the "sooty" ritual of those indigenous people outlawed so that the wives of the dead were no longer thrown ALIVE on the funeral pyre husband.They also tried to breakdown the "caste" system in India which kept sections of the population in the gutter through just been born in the wrong "caste" Sorry mate it is you who need to do some reading!.
@Fartsurmonde Put - Napoleon - on the same line as hitler, mussolini or franco when he reigned over a century and a half before, at times totally different, it is of great stupidity. And if you want an ultimate argument, Napoleon was not racist, he was educated by the great ideals of the " LUMIERES" . He has done great things for the emancipation of the Jews and to promote their integration in France when Hitler exterminated the Jews .
@ROME59 -I was only making the link because they were all tyrants that England has helped remove from power.In this context it is irrelevant and ridiculous to argue "he was not a racist" "he done great things in emancipation of Jews" -On that argument that Hitler built great autobahns & did a lot for the sale of smart black uniforms! Napoleon was a tyrant he had helped in the killing of human beings right across Europe.England stood in his way as it did with all the other tyrants I list.
England (Britain btw) defeated Franco, really, when was that? Russia, or at least their weather defeated Napoleon. That leaves Mussolini, and you'll find an awful lot of other nations played a part in that, and lets face it, he wasn't very hard to defeat was he?
@manfred898 -I was not meaning necessarily only UK involvement in their over throw of these tyrants but that the UK opposed all the tyrants of Franco,Mussolini, Hitler,the Argentina Junta,and the Soviets and Napoleon and helped defeat them all for the wider world's freedom. How many countries can claim that?
Il y a une statue de Napoléon à côté du lac de Laffrey, l'endroit de la rencontre avec le maréchal Ney, suis souvent passé par là étant Grenoblois.
Napoléon n'aurait jamais du revenir en 1815, pouvait-il ignorer que son retour déclencherait une nième coalition contre nous ? bien sûr que non !
C'est un homme qui aimait les batailles et les conquêtes, il aura fait bcp de mal à la France dans le sillage de la révolution (dont le musée se trouve à Vizille, encore une ville proche de Grenoble ! )
Il fallait arrêter Napoléon à ce moment là: assez de malheurs à son palmarès pour pas en rajouter ...
Napoléon n'a pas su s'arrêter à temps, ses maréchaux lui ont souvent dit, il n'a rien entendu car je crois qu'il aimait trop la guerre, les batailles, le son du canon : il aurait du rester un général au service de la nation .
Vu plusieurs fois la statue (toute noire) de Napoléon à l'endroit de la rencontre de Laffrey, il y a un magnifique lac (du même nom) à côté.
J'adore. Et Christian Clavier fait un bon petit Napoléon qui enlève ce stéréotype de l'empereur égocentrique et machiavélique que tout les incultes lui colle au visage.
C'était pas un enfant de coeur non plus, mais c'était loin d'être un monstre.
@seabornegrad, Napoleon and his personal guard of 1000 men invaded the mainland of Europe. Marshal Ney was in command of a battalion of men to arrest or kill Napoleon. The French emperor stood before the soldiers of the fifth and awaited their decision to kill him or not, fortunately, they all joined him including the Marshal.
Napoleon who was Exiled in a small island off the french coast landed back in south france and took back its throne whitout blood his army welcoming him back
@jeje6868 J'ai dit ça parce que certains prétendent qu'il aurait réussi cet exploit en leur racontant que les Bourbons étaient déjà en fuite... sauf que pour dire tout ça, il n'aurait pas eu assez de temps avant que Randon ne dise "Feu !"
Et c'est bien le même Randon qui est devenu maréchal sous Napoléon III !
Ca alors.. Je ne savais pas.. Comment a-t-il pu se faire elver a lad ignite de Marechal apres ca... Avait-il donne l'ordre d'ouvrir le feu sur Napo Ier??
Si oui, c'est plutot encourageant de voir que de telles erreurs ne nuisent pas a une belle carriere :-)
à la decharge des derniers Bourbons , on peut avouer tout de même que s'il y a des gens qui ont des bonnes raisons d'être rancunier c bien eux ! Les trahisons et le destin c'est assez acharné sur eux ( les decennies precedentes) pour effacer en eux tout sentimentalisme et doutes envers les personnes qui les servent . Quand on les a trahis c fini , on les reprend pas 2 fois a faire les mêmes erreurs ... sauf pour les révolutions ( Ok , je sors ... lol )
@ROME59 Louis XVI a fait l'erreur fatale de vouloir récupérer la totalité de son pouvoir (qui n'était finalement pas si amoindri) en laissant les armées étrangères envahir la France... Il ne faisait plus un avec la nation et les gens ont préféré cette dernière à leur souverain.
Parce que Napoléon ne fut pas trahi plus d'une fois et la France aussi par bon nombre d'immigrés qui ne l'aimaient pas elle mais n'aimaient que leur honteux privilèges en méprisant le peuple de France ?
Le monde avait changé et les peuples aspirès à l'émancipation et l'égalité des chances !!
Après le rétablissement de la monarchie en 1814 avant "Les 100 Jours", la noblesse arrogante et prétentieuse envers le peuple ne l'avait toujours pas compris, ce qui expliqua d'ailleurs la joie du peuple et son adhésion totale à Napoléon et à la nouvelle société qu'il avait érigée durant les 100 jours
Elle ne le compris pas non plus en 1815 après a défaite de Waterloo et son nouveau rétablissement forcé...
L'ancien régime sclérosé par des siècles de mépris et de haine même, pour le peuple de France n'a donc eu par la suite que ce qu'il mérité et a semé...
Vive la République et le 1er Empire, son logique descendant :-)
En 26 ans (de la Révolution de 1789 en passant par la 1ère République et jusqu'à la fin définitive du 1er Empire en 1815), la France "créa" et eu (et donc offrit à l'Europe et au monde) plus de brillants savants, de grands orateurs et hommes politiques, de grands généraux et maréchaux, de grands militaires (car je n'oublies pas les autres, officiers, sous-officiers et militaire du rang ^^) que durant les 1700 ans qui précédèrent !!! ^^
Sur ce point là ce ne serait pas plus mal si c'était vrai, car cela voudrait dire moins de guerre et de larmes et ce n'est pas plus mal, je ne suis pas un va-t-en-guerre à tous va et pour rien, et pourtant ("parce que" en fait devrais-je dire) je sais ce que c'est une guerre, je peux donc me permettre de dire cela, mais c'est faux puisque la 1ère GM par exemple nous apporta aussi de glorieux anciens : Avec nos 1.700.000 soldats tués on compte pour moi 1.700.000 héros de la France :-)
@cumbas Je n'avais pas l'intention d'insulter les braves qui sont morts pour la France au cours des deux guerres mondiales, d'autant que ma famille compte quelques croix de bois et quelques croix de guerre. Je voulais parler de la gloire inégalée que se sont acquis les généraux et maréchaux de Napoléon.
Tu as le commentaire comme si je défendais le contraire ?
Je te convie à chercher mes commentaires sur ce site ou d'aller faire un tour sur ma chaine
Et sur ce point donc je ne te contredirai pas puisque c'est aussi mon point de vue et mon opinion et sans doutes même depuis bien plus longtemps que toi vue nos ages
@cumbas je ne te contredis pas non plus, ce n'était pas mon intention. Tu parlais des hommes politiques, ces hommes politiques ont apporté des idées au monde, idées qui sont encore présentes, même si ces hommes sont mort. C'est ça la plus grande contribution selon moi.
I see your point, mais je pense que Louis XVIII a ete relativement indulgent pendant les 100 jours. En tout cas pour le haut du panier (jusqu'e et y compris Ney). Pas pour les demis-soldes, c'est sur
@Fartsurmonde The UK supported the tyrants of Louis XVI, Alexander I, Nicholas II and Leopold II. The UK oppressed and tyrannized the Scottish, Irish, Indians, Boers, Zulu, Afrikaners, Chinese and many others. While the UK cleaned up a bit with their actions against the Fascist regimes of Europe it's hands are far from clean.
nstwelvegauge 2 weeks ago
I'd really much rather listen to the French version, with English subtitles. After a couple viewings and knowing what is being said, then I'd just turn the subtitles off and watch it in the original French version. How else? - But I think the only version like that is made in Canada. Damn. Why an English speaking version with French subtitles?
19XWyomingGrizFan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
France should investigate its own "dirty and bloody history instead of other nations France was responsible for the deaths of 45,000 people in Algeria in 1945 and for the massacre of up to 800,000 people in Rwanda in 1994.PLEASE CHECK WIKIPEDIA
edcboatman 1 month ago
Fuck those English Parlamentary filthy rats. Nothing but the USA of two centuries ago. Trading gold for german and russian blood, they had a pathetic army in general and could not even dream of beating the Grand Armee on their own. Pretty much like Germany on both world wars, more than ten countries sweting their balls out to overpower a single powerful enemy. The revolutionary ideias of back then could have changed this shitty world where money is way more valued than lives. Vive L'Empereur!
febertotti 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@febertotti -But you ask the impossible , as history has shown the English have faced all the tyrants of Europe Napoleon, Hitler,Mussolini, Franco and have defeated them all -it is the will of God and God is an Englishman :)
Fartsurmonde 1 month ago
This scene is one of the most striking and moving event in the french history that we learn at school
MRjlouis3131 4 months ago 3
The last european Empire, the last european dream of Brotherhood.
You have given us the first "Reign of Italy", from the fall of the Roman Empire, merci beaucoup Napoléon. Vive l'Empereur!
Greetings from Italy
GreenDevil4 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this scene in this movie made me smile and happy :D
1236sason 6 months ago
Senhorpesopesado no ! He was trying to do the revolution and democraty in Europe !
Aldario74 6 months ago
he was trying to conquer the europe -.-'
SenhorPesoPesado 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
guys, he was like hitler
SenhorPesoPesado 6 months ago
@SenhorPesoPesado dont ever compare the two. without napoleon europe would still be ruled by the holy roman empire and he gave jews citizenship unheard of the times. i admit he did lust for power but he also changed military tactics and wasnt a bad man. hitler was in it for genocide napoleon for GLORY
seminoleboy96 6 months ago
@seminoleboy96 Well, i tought very bad, i didn't studied the history of napoleon, But he killed portuguese, lot of portuguese, and I'm angry about it, but thinking by the good side, he did good to europe :D
SenhorPesoPesado 4 months ago
@SenhorPesoPesado spanish killed alot more portugese... and he didnt lead the campaigns in the iberian penisula
seminoleboy96 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SenhorPesoPesado
Napoleon granted religious freedom to the Jews, Hitler killed them. Napoleon felt his Civil Code was his greatest work, Hitler felt cleansing the world of "sub-races" was his greatest work. Napoleon on his own was a military genius; Hitler was not. Napoleon loved his family, Hitler despised his. Napoleon inherited France's wars, Hitler initiated his wars. But, Hitler was much worse then Napoleon.
donga33260 5 months ago
Ney avait promis de ramener Napoleon dans une cage de fer. Pour s'etre rallié à lui, il sera fusillé...
flownet07 8 months ago
Napoleon was great.really was great
arslan7189 10 months ago 4
ancien para je suis aujourd hui policier, j'aime mon pays , je suis triste aujourd hui , car je me demande où sont passés de tels hommes de tels soldats de tels generaux...de tels patriotes.nous ne sommes même plus l'ombre de nous même.
austerlitz1805fr 10 months ago 2
This scence is much better in Waterloo with Rod Steiger.
Out oif books I read not Ney gave directly the command to fire......but an officer in the 1st line..and Napoleon didnt blame hime later for this command
JediFerdi 10 months ago
God, who WOULDNT join him? LOL
stringerboi 11 months ago 3
Vive la France, vive la Liberte.
ledermann7 11 months ago 12
@ledermann7
shadedness 9 months ago
@ledermann7 And fuck all dirty muslims and niggers, who make dirty your GREAT countrey !!!
nolt2004 8 months ago 2
@ledermann7 AMEN to that! we need a second American Revolution now! this country is going to the shits... :(
dicorsini 4 months ago 2
@ledermann7 l
France ? Liberté ?
Quelle farce.
Nous avons assassiné des millions de paysans illettrés et démunis, de pauvres noirs, de pauvres arabes que nous avons rendus en esclavage, pour mieux exploiter leurs richesses naturelles.
Nous avons du sang plein les mains et nous donnons des leçons à tout le monde.
Nous avons agressé du temps des Louis et des Bonaparte nos voisins, dont les Allemands et les Italiens, et le pire, nous jouons les victimes.
mrktyb 1 month ago
@mrktyb Si tu n'aimes pas la france, va avoir ailleurs
MRjlouis3131 1 month ago
@MRjlouis3131 mais tu es vraiment un raciste ! C'est pas possible.
nous sommes blancs depuis des générations. mais MOI monsieur, je suis assez courageux pour affronter tout le mal que nous avons fait sur la terre, abusant des plus faibles et les réduisant pour plusieurs en esclavage.
Mois toi, tu as tes lunettes roses, et en plus tu fais l'autruche.
Aies le courage de demander pardon aux autres nations pour nos crimes abominables.
Ne te voiles pas la face comme le suggère Sarkozy.
mrktyb 1 month ago
@mrktyb arrête un peu ... on est les seuls à avoir fait du mal sur terre? Ce n'est pas nous qui avons inventé les camps de concentration (mais les anglais en afrique du sud), ce n'est pas nous qui vons inventé les camps d'extermination (mais les allemands) ce n'est pas nous qui avons exterminé les amériendiens (encore les rosebeef)... pour une nation comme pour un homme la vie est un combat... Il n'y a que les français pour s'autoflagélé comme ça...
francophilebreton 3 weeks ago
VIVE L EMPEREUR A JAMAIS IMMORTEL VIVE LA FRANCE!
gauthierguillaume 11 months ago 3
Christian Clavier is the best Napoleon ever!!!!!
Kuddel64 1 year ago 3
@gyrofoam1 Thanks for this valuable contribution
Treyppa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gyrofoam1 I like how you failed to answer my question, probably because you have no idea who any of these people actually were, and tried to cover it up with an incredibly old pun.
Bernstein1917 1 year ago
Cette scène est poignante!
elite32predator 1 year ago
Belles retrouvailles!
Soult57180 1 year ago
le fameux'' mot de Cambrone''..... ''merde''!
DOWSER68 1 year ago
Vive Napoleon
Vive la France
Jean - Brasil
BloodEHonour 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
People love those to who take them to massacre.
shoshenkis 1 year ago
The commander should've just pulled out a pistol and shot the shitsack himself.
gyrofoam1 1 year ago 2
@gyrofoam1 It's Ney, why would he do this
Treyppa 1 year ago
@gyrofoam1 Why should he have shot him? Napoleon was a far better leader than Louis XVIII, he had the army's support, if only the English and Prussians had stayed out of it (or if the ground at Waterloo had been dry) history would have been much different.
Bernstein1917 1 year ago 16
@Bernstein1917 Agree. Napoleon was a legend. And this scene just goes to show how great he was, in that an entire army of men sent to kill him refused to shoot him and instead joined him. Not a single man out of all of them. That is just amazing.
jizzinmypants191919 1 year ago
@Bernstein1917 -But you ask the impossible , as history has shown the English have faced all the tyrants of Europe Napoleon, Hitler,Mussolini, Franco and have defeated them all -it is the will of God and God is an Englishman :)
Fartsurmonde 1 month ago
@Fartsurmonde Napoleon was not a tyrant because he was elected by the French people to become emperor, in a democratic vote (even if only rich people could vote). But it was the prelude to future elections. The King of England was a tyrant because he inherited the crown without being elected by the people of Britain, unlike the French sovereign.
ROME59 1 month ago
@ROME59 -The King of England was not trying to enslave all of Europe under his rule.
Also it should not be forgot he named himself emperor having helped remove the Monarchy of France!
Fartsurmonde 1 month ago
@Fartsurmonde
Hmmmm, well, just Africa and Asia then.
manfred898 3 weeks ago
@manfred898 -Sorry Manfred I do not know what you are remarking about on this thread.
Fartsurmonde 2 weeks ago
@Fartsurmonde
I'm suggesting that the King of England was busily enslaving the rest of the world.
manfred898 2 weeks ago
@manfred898 -Very different -was not enslaving them -was pulling them into the modern world.Napoleon on the other hand was attacking equally developed countries and trying to enslave them like Hitler tried in the 20th Century.
Fartsurmonde 2 weeks ago
@Fartsurmonde
That's a very imperialistic thing to say. Millions died from engineered famines, revolts were violently surpressed, native peoples became third class citizens in their own land, by any other ruling that's enslaving. it's supremely arrogant to suggest that countries can't develop in their own way. If that was the case it would have been better for China to rule Europe up until the ( European ) renaissance.
manfred898 2 weeks ago
@manfred898 -Yes it may not be "PC" and sound imperialistic nowadays but it is never the less true.The British Empire was no different from the other european empires of the time but it did have a aim not so prevalent in many of those other empires and that it is it aimed to educate the people it conquered to British standards and virtues.So hospitals were set up in deepest India and Africa to British standards yes the "natives" were not allowed necessarily to progress to top jobs
Fartsurmonde 2 weeks ago
@manfred898 But, the seeds of the standards was set so later those countries were in a position to have a similar standard of medical service. Kenya and Nigeria are now throwing that in turmoil in recent years but they are independent they can not blame anyone but themselves.India has very good hospitals which could be improved upon if they stopped wasting money on space exploration.Education helped them too and India was brought together by the use of English as second language.
Fartsurmonde 2 weeks ago
@manfred898 -Also look at America,Canada, New Zealand, Australia and South Africa all vibrant successful countries -if they had not been part of the British Empire they would have probably been open to eventual conquering by China,Russia or perhaps even North Korea! -but because they were dragged up to the standards of the UK they are too strong to be taken over through War -THAT IS FREEDOM
Fartsurmonde 2 weeks ago
@Fartsurmonde
THAT IS NONSENSE :) In the countries you mention, the indigenous populations were at best marginalised, and they still are to a large degree. As for 'open to invasion by China, Russia, or, ahem, North Korea ;), that is fanciful bullshit, you don't really know what you're taking about do you? Read a little more, you're arrogance borders on racism.
manfred898 2 weeks ago
@Fartsurmonde
*Your* arrogance.
manfred898 2 weeks ago
@manfred898 Same arrogance as Napoleon maybe? -no he was a tyrant, I just speak the truth
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
No, the arrogance of an ignorant teenager, a few history classes and he thinks he understands the world. That's what I'm guessing here.
manfred898 1 week ago
@manfred898 -No Manfred, my teenage years are long behind me, but I received an education that is unsurpassed -the education of life and the of reading good books instead of Wikipedia which I suspect is your main sponsor for your lacking education :)
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
Was it that education that explained Britains heroic role in the defeat of Franco then? ;)
manfred898 1 week ago
@manfred898 Britain opposed Franco as they opposed all the other tyrants -there were many Britons who joined the International fighters including George Orwell who wrote "1984" as a warning of future dangers in a dictatorship,
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
Haha! Those fighters were independant citizens, they were nothing to do with British policy, infact they were mainly Socialist in ideology, certainly not what the British regime would have encouraged :) If you'd actually read 'Homage to Catalonia', you'd understand. Desperate pleas by the Spanish Republican government for assistance from the European democracies of Britain and France fell, overwhelmingly, on deaf ears....
manfred898 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
.....British policy of the time was all about appeasing facists in Europe, or have you conveniently forgotten that fact? You're really grasping at straws! :)
manfred898 1 week ago
@manfred898 -No you are grabbing at straws as if you really read history you would know Britain rejected the peace offer from Hitler and went to War -the appeasers were ignored.Please get an education and stop relying on movies,TV and Wiki for your educational information which is made up drivel.
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
Yep, I must have got my Irish famine 'facts' from Wiki too, hmmm? ;)
manfred898 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde -marginalised indigenous people?-British did not do that the new Americans and Australians did that.The British in India made the "sooty" ritual of those indigenous people outlawed so that the wives of the dead were no longer thrown ALIVE on the funeral pyre husband.They also tried to breakdown the "caste" system in India which kept sections of the population in the gutter through just been born in the wrong "caste" Sorry mate it is you who need to do some reading.
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
Whilst at the same time hanging children for stealing bread, and subjugating the Irish for being a different religion; and allowing more than a million Irish to die of starvation to protect their economic system. They did that in India too, even in the 1940s ;) Fine arbitrators of moral code I must say ;)
manfred898 1 week ago
@manfred898 -Britain was not the only country who punished children in such a way but at least we did not guillotine them as they did in France. It is a common myth which is projected by the Irish that Britain starved them, when in fact it was because as it does today it rained and flooded wiping out two harvests that caused the famine. In India it was not caused by the British either,any starvation problems were there way before the British landed there.So what you carping on about
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
I thought you'd gone ;) You still haven't explained to me how the English defeated Franco, we'll just ignore that one will we? ;) Of course Britain wasn't the only country to do that, though I draw no distinction between hanging and the guillotine, I'd rather be guillotined to be honest. My point is, you can't really comment on barbaric practice peculiar to some Indian tribes of the period......
manfred898 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
....as justification for their subjugation when equally barbaric practices existed in England. As for the famines of Ireland, again, read proper history, not just your jingoistic back slapping English sort, the fact is, a blight struck the potato crops ( a virulent fungus ) spread by the wind, (where you got this flood nonsense I don't know!) and the English did virtually nothing to relieve it, they let 1 million of who were supposedly their own citizens starve....
manfred898 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde
......even though they were the wealthiest society on earth, simply to protect their markets. Enlightened enough to spread moral code to India? Do you think? As for the Bengal famines of the 1940s, Basically England occupied a hugely material rich land, yet did nothing to alleviate a famine that killed millions, again for economic reasons, that was your great man Winston Churchill...
manfred898 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde ....Moral bench marks? Hardly. You skim history my friend, to suit your Nationalistic ideals, to make you feel somehow superior through a chance of birth, you don't really grasp it at all.
manfred898 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fartsurmonde -marginalised indigenous people?-British did not do that the new Americans and Australians did that.The British in India made the "sooty" ritual of those indigenous people outlawed so that the wives of the dead were no longer thrown ALIVE on the funeral pyre husband.They also tried to breakdown the "caste" system in India which kept sections of the population in the gutter through just been born in the wrong "caste" Sorry mate it is you who need to do some reading!.
Fartsurmonde 1 week ago
@Fartsurmonde Put - Napoleon - on the same line as hitler, mussolini or franco when he reigned over a century and a half before, at times totally different, it is of great stupidity. And if you want an ultimate argument, Napoleon was not racist, he was educated by the great ideals of the " LUMIERES" . He has done great things for the emancipation of the Jews and to promote their integration in France when Hitler exterminated the Jews .
ROME59 1 month ago
@ROME59 -I was only making the link because they were all tyrants that England has helped remove from power.In this context it is irrelevant and ridiculous to argue "he was not a racist" "he done great things in emancipation of Jews" -On that argument that Hitler built great autobahns & did a lot for the sale of smart black uniforms! Napoleon was a tyrant he had helped in the killing of human beings right across Europe.England stood in his way as it did with all the other tyrants I list.
Fartsurmonde 1 month ago
@Fartsurmonde
England (Britain btw) defeated Franco, really, when was that? Russia, or at least their weather defeated Napoleon. That leaves Mussolini, and you'll find an awful lot of other nations played a part in that, and lets face it, he wasn't very hard to defeat was he?
manfred898 2 weeks ago
@manfred898 -I was not meaning necessarily only UK involvement in their over throw of these tyrants but that the UK opposed all the tyrants of Franco,Mussolini, Hitler,the Argentina Junta,and the Soviets and Napoleon and helped defeat them all for the wider world's freedom. How many countries can claim that?
Fartsurmonde 2 weeks ago
The same, but in a better quality /watch?v=L4OMvv-oqcw
nicoon59 1 year ago
vive l'empereur
guitoulio62 1 year ago
3:44 epic!!!
MetallicAwwf316 1 year ago 2
Napoléon un des plus grands hommes de tout les temps je suis un de ses plus fervents admirateurs
Vive le France vive l'empereur
xXPr1nceDEATHXx 1 year ago
uhhh....what happened here?
ghostmarines 1 year ago
@ghostmarines ya, looks fantastic!
bungPanporto 1 year ago
Le maréchal Ney était roux en réalité
seahawkwhite 1 year ago
Vive l'empereur!
JoeDurobot 1 year ago
Marshal Ney was sentenced to death by the british for this :(
Treyppa 1 year ago
haha I like when he said : '' keep your sword imbecile , otherwise with what would you protect your emperor '' :')
Vive la France ! La plus grande nation ! :))
MarioDumont 1 year ago
Bel épisode du 1er empire !
mallocny 1 year ago
The Anglo-Saxons had never shot a good movie abt Naponeon.
The Russians really did it better
haochuan3333 1 year ago
napoleon à berlin . hitler à paris . qui sème le vent ...
TheWa3r 1 year ago
Il y a une statue de Napoléon à côté du lac de Laffrey, l'endroit de la rencontre avec le maréchal Ney, suis souvent passé par là étant Grenoblois.
Napoléon n'aurait jamais du revenir en 1815, pouvait-il ignorer que son retour déclencherait une nième coalition contre nous ? bien sûr que non !
C'est un homme qui aimait les batailles et les conquêtes, il aura fait bcp de mal à la France dans le sillage de la révolution (dont le musée se trouve à Vizille, encore une ville proche de Grenoble ! )
MrBilbo13 1 year ago
badly made
spoiledkid999 1 year ago
I love France and it's culture!
lunizzodessa 1 year ago
Of all the people in France, the army was the most loyal. They coldnt kill his emperor, his General.
Even though I couldnt actually understand what they say, the images speak for themselves. This was a beautiful scene.
Long Live Napoleon.!!
oortiz915 1 year ago
scène magistrale et qui plus est réele... Vive l'empereur!!
Jabthecat 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Le drapeau tricolor ou rien !!! Vive la France !!!
joe2035 1 year ago
Le drapeau tricolor ou rien !!! quelle ferveur patriotique, mais disparue aujourd'hui ...
seahawkwhite 1 year ago
Not blood.Oh Napoleon!
huuhoang990 1 year ago
Vive l'Empereur !
Marin1991100 1 year ago
beautiful scene
HolyGK 1 year ago
Il fallait arrêter Napoléon à ce moment là: assez de malheurs à son palmarès pour pas en rajouter ...
Napoléon n'a pas su s'arrêter à temps, ses maréchaux lui ont souvent dit, il n'a rien entendu car je crois qu'il aimait trop la guerre, les batailles, le son du canon : il aurait du rester un général au service de la nation .
Vu plusieurs fois la statue (toute noire) de Napoléon à l'endroit de la rencontre de Laffrey, il y a un magnifique lac (du même nom) à côté.
MrBilbo13 1 year ago
c'est quoi le film ?
ikichi1 1 year ago
This was a serie called Napoleon.Main character:Christian Clavier avec:
Isabella Rossellini as Josephine,Jhon Malkovich et Gerard Depardieu.
Impecable!
QueenAlexandra2007 1 year ago
"Le drapeau tri-colors, ou rien !"
J'adore. Et Christian Clavier fait un bon petit Napoléon qui enlève ce stéréotype de l'empereur égocentrique et machiavélique que tout les incultes lui colle au visage.
C'était pas un enfant de coeur non plus, mais c'était loin d'être un monstre.
Vive la France ! Vive l'empereur !
thelordnazgul76 1 year ago 3
Non! Not as this did happen! Mon Ami. I was there and the like was not as such.
RasMajnouni 1 year ago
J'adore le:
MAis garde ton sabre imbécile, avec quoi tu va défendre ton empereur ^^
VIVE LA FRANCE, vive NAPOLEON
kentheking59 1 year ago
Vive l'Empereur! Assez de comunistes et islamistes en France!
Lepantus 1 year ago
Can anyone tell me what movie this is from?
spartanbasileus 1 year ago
The TV show called "Napoleon". This episode is done in a mcuh better way in de Laurentiis' Waterloo.
brutuscassius1 1 year ago
Can Someone please enlighten me as to what happened here?
seabornegrad 1 year ago
@seabornegrad, Napoleon and his personal guard of 1000 men invaded the mainland of Europe. Marshal Ney was in command of a battalion of men to arrest or kill Napoleon. The French emperor stood before the soldiers of the fifth and awaited their decision to kill him or not, fortunately, they all joined him including the Marshal.
expertstrategy 1 year ago
Napoleon who was Exiled in a small island off the french coast landed back in south france and took back its throne whitout blood his army welcoming him back
seb2455 1 year ago
Viva por Siempre el Más Grande Emperador que ha visto la humanidad.
cesarvilela 1 year ago 26
Excellent . Napoleon was a great Emperor. No doubt about it.
johnmichaelbaloch 1 year ago 33
@johnmichaelbaloch Mais il pouvait pas battre L'Empire Ottoman ! :)
sacridofus1 11 months ago
@sacridofus1 Oh putain tu m'as bien fait rire.
L'empire ottoman était pitoyable.
Regarde la bataille du mont thabor, Napoléon a battu les ottomans avec 4000 soldats alors qu'eux étaient 25 000.
LeHappiste 7 months ago
@LeHappiste roh c des connerie ...
sacridofus1 7 months ago
@johnmichaelbaloch Where are you from friend?
SenhorPesoPesado 6 months ago
@johnmichaelbaloch
Nope.
tcpgblizzard 5 months ago
whats the name of the movie?
froget86 1 year ago
Celui qui a commandé (sans résultat) le feu s'appelait RANDON! Il est devenu quelqu'un sous le second empire!
miguelmoutoy 2 years ago 3
dans le film dont est extrait ce passage, il s'agit du maréchal Ney, juste pour info, tu as peut etre raison, honnetement je n'en sais rien
TooShortfeatNWA 1 year ago
NEY était à LONS le SAUNIER, c'est la même erreur que dans le Waterloo de BONDARTCHOUK!
C'est dira-t-il à son procès le général BERTRAND (ou un de ses émissaires) qui est venu le "relancer"!!! ;-)
miguelmoutoy 1 year ago
merci de cette précision, je suis maintenant fixé ;)
TooShortfeatNWA 1 year ago
C'est quand même super classe.
Killerjsa 2 years ago 2
-Oh Merde !
-Qui a t-il?
-Non rien
MDR
VIVE LA FRANCE ! <3
Scratator 2 years ago 3
La classe
Porodiziateur 2 years ago
NEY n'était pas là! Il était à LONS-LE-SAUNIER!
miguelmoutoy 2 years ago 2
oui c'est vrai, mais ce mensonge est tellement beau....
jeje6868 2 years ago
@jeje6868 Sauf que ça s'est réellement passé comme ça (avec Randon à la place du maréchal Ney).
Une victoire plus belle encore qu'Austerlitz... pas de morts !
NapoleonCalland 1 year ago
Oui oui, je ne dis pas le contraire. Le "mensonge" fesait allusion a la presence de Ney, pas la scene en general....
Randon... C'est bien le marechal Jacques Louis Randon?????
jeje6868 1 year ago
@jeje6868 J'ai dit ça parce que certains prétendent qu'il aurait réussi cet exploit en leur racontant que les Bourbons étaient déjà en fuite... sauf que pour dire tout ça, il n'aurait pas eu assez de temps avant que Randon ne dise "Feu !"
Et c'est bien le même Randon qui est devenu maréchal sous Napoléon III !
NapoleonCalland 1 year ago
Ca alors.. Je ne savais pas.. Comment a-t-il pu se faire elver a lad ignite de Marechal apres ca... Avait-il donne l'ordre d'ouvrir le feu sur Napo Ier??
Si oui, c'est plutot encourageant de voir que de telles erreurs ne nuisent pas a une belle carriere :-)
jeje6868 1 year ago
@jeje6868
Ça s'appelle le sens du pardon. Les Bourbons n'en ont pas fait autant ;)
NapoleonCalland 1 year ago
à la decharge des derniers Bourbons , on peut avouer tout de même que s'il y a des gens qui ont des bonnes raisons d'être rancunier c bien eux ! Les trahisons et le destin c'est assez acharné sur eux ( les decennies precedentes) pour effacer en eux tout sentimentalisme et doutes envers les personnes qui les servent . Quand on les a trahis c fini , on les reprend pas 2 fois a faire les mêmes erreurs ... sauf pour les révolutions ( Ok , je sors ... lol )
ROME59 1 year ago
@ROME59 Louis XVI a fait l'erreur fatale de vouloir récupérer la totalité de son pouvoir (qui n'était finalement pas si amoindri) en laissant les armées étrangères envahir la France... Il ne faisait plus un avec la nation et les gens ont préféré cette dernière à leur souverain.
Hogartumineo 1 year ago
@Hogartumineo , Louis XVI, tu es sûre? Louis XVI était guillotiné depuis belle lurette. Tu confonds avec Louis XVIII qui est le frère de Louis XVI
230987fr 10 months ago
@ROME59
Parce que Napoléon ne fut pas trahi plus d'une fois et la France aussi par bon nombre d'immigrés qui ne l'aimaient pas elle mais n'aimaient que leur honteux privilèges en méprisant le peuple de France ?
Le monde avait changé et les peuples aspirès à l'émancipation et l'égalité des chances !!
cumbas 1 year ago
Après le rétablissement de la monarchie en 1814 avant "Les 100 Jours", la noblesse arrogante et prétentieuse envers le peuple ne l'avait toujours pas compris, ce qui expliqua d'ailleurs la joie du peuple et son adhésion totale à Napoléon et à la nouvelle société qu'il avait érigée durant les 100 jours
Elle ne le compris pas non plus en 1815 après a défaite de Waterloo et son nouveau rétablissement forcé...
cumbas 1 year ago
L'ancien régime sclérosé par des siècles de mépris et de haine même, pour le peuple de France n'a donc eu par la suite que ce qu'il mérité et a semé...
Vive la République et le 1er Empire, son logique descendant :-)
cumbas 1 year ago
@cumbas Les plus glorieux généraux et maréchaux que la France aie jamais eu étaient tous issus du peuple...
1piazzola 1 year ago
@1piazzola
Je dirai même plus :
En 26 ans (de la Révolution de 1789 en passant par la 1ère République et jusqu'à la fin définitive du 1er Empire en 1815), la France "créa" et eu (et donc offrit à l'Europe et au monde) plus de brillants savants, de grands orateurs et hommes politiques, de grands généraux et maréchaux, de grands militaires (car je n'oublies pas les autres, officiers, sous-officiers et militaire du rang ^^) que durant les 1700 ans qui précédèrent !!! ^^
:-)
cumbas 1 year ago
@cumbas ... et les siècles qui suivirent (du moins en ce qui concerne les guerriers)
1piazzola 1 year ago
@1piazzola
Sur ce point là ce ne serait pas plus mal si c'était vrai, car cela voudrait dire moins de guerre et de larmes et ce n'est pas plus mal, je ne suis pas un va-t-en-guerre à tous va et pour rien, et pourtant ("parce que" en fait devrais-je dire) je sais ce que c'est une guerre, je peux donc me permettre de dire cela, mais c'est faux puisque la 1ère GM par exemple nous apporta aussi de glorieux anciens : Avec nos 1.700.000 soldats tués on compte pour moi 1.700.000 héros de la France :-)
cumbas 1 year ago
@cumbas Je n'avais pas l'intention d'insulter les braves qui sont morts pour la France au cours des deux guerres mondiales, d'autant que ma famille compte quelques croix de bois et quelques croix de guerre. Je voulais parler de la gloire inégalée que se sont acquis les généraux et maréchaux de Napoléon.
1piazzola 1 year ago
@cumbas la France n'a pas offert au monde des hommes politiques et des militaires, mais des idées. Les idées ne meurt jamais.
philbox17 1 year ago
@philbox17
Et ??
Tu as le commentaire comme si je défendais le contraire ?
Je te convie à chercher mes commentaires sur ce site ou d'aller faire un tour sur ma chaine
Et sur ce point donc je ne te contredirai pas puisque c'est aussi mon point de vue et mon opinion et sans doutes même depuis bien plus longtemps que toi vue nos ages
cumbas 1 year ago
@cumbas je ne te contredis pas non plus, ce n'était pas mon intention. Tu parlais des hommes politiques, ces hommes politiques ont apporté des idées au monde, idées qui sont encore présentes, même si ces hommes sont mort. C'est ça la plus grande contribution selon moi.
philbox17 1 year ago
@philbox17
ok mais avoue qu'on peut le comprendre ainsi à te lire :-)
cumbas 1 year ago
I see your point, mais je pense que Louis XVIII a ete relativement indulgent pendant les 100 jours. En tout cas pour le haut du panier (jusqu'e et y compris Ney). Pas pour les demis-soldes, c'est sur
jeje6868 1 year ago
Il n'était pas au pouvoir pendant les Cent Jours ! C'est quand il est revenu après les Cent Jours que la Terreur Blanche s'est abattu sur le pays !
Ney, Labédoyère et bien d'autres fusillés !
Brune et des milliers de Bonapartistes, de mamelouks et de "Libéraux" assassinés !
Elle était belle l'indulgence de Louis XVIII !
NapoleonCalland 1 year ago
test
archiebunkerville 2 years ago 2
super super
123systemlord 2 years ago
je suis napoleon ...moi voila .....grnde bella fiction!!!!!!!!
babbonatale1996 2 years ago
napoleon said, we will not fire on french soldiers, nay gave order to open fire, nobody did,
sillyg900 2 years ago 3
WTF Just happend?! can someone explain to me in english please!!!!!!!!! iits pretty obvious what happend but i didnt understand WTF they said!!!!
OCintoM21 2 years ago
someone founded the subtitle for this film?
I only found romenian/dutch/spanish o-o
LeozinhoPlaybass 2 years ago
Napoleon is just awesome...
:,>
KayVoorhees 2 years ago 3
bonaparte est un des plus gran homme de ces 2 derniers milleneres
gloire a horus
MrAleistercrowley666 2 years ago
Je ne parles fraincais ho ho ho, vive l'America! oui oui. sip sip poo poo ca ca
BazzBrother 2 years ago
its amerique not america, dont mix french and spanish please
occi31 2 years ago
@occi31 did the poo poo ca ca give me away?
BazzBrother 2 years ago
@BazzBrother caca
occi31 2 years ago
@occi31 damn, should of gone with 'doo doo'
BazzBrother 2 years ago
@occi31 why only spanish, it could have been italian
froget86 1 year ago
@occi31 "l'america" l' does not exist in spanish
froget86 1 year ago
Bonaparte avait fait l' europe
bien avant , un exemple !
giguane 2 years ago 2
Sauf que, sauf mon respect pour lui, on peut tout faire avec des baionettes sauf s'assoir dessus, comme disais Clemenceau...
jeje6868 1 year ago
c vrai c une scène forte
VIVE NAPOLEON (dans lotre vie) lol
BlackDreamNB1 2 years ago
Napoleon a été une grande homme
FlashCharizard 2 years ago
français contre français après la révolution, fallait avoir des c........pour faire ça nabulio forever !
gaf1943 2 years ago
vive la france ! la france des DROITS DE L HOMMES voila ma devise !
lewarriordu78 2 years ago 3
Long live the emperor of europe!
Hugs from germany.
Eric0816 2 years ago 4
Классный эпизод!
GP1739 2 years ago
Napoleon is Europe!
xr1983kr 2 years ago 3
The actor playing Napoleon is PERFECT. He's exactly how I imagine the real Napoleon looked.
iceheart920 2 years ago 13
yes, but he's older than true Napoleon !
<