When Cardinal Ratzinger was asked whether a U.S. led war on Iraq would be “just war” he replied before it started: ”Certainly not… the damage would be greater than the values one hopes to save.”
When Cardinal Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI, he said during his Easter message in 2008: “Nothing positive comes from Iraq, torn apart by continual slaughter as the civil population flees…”
Maybe this guy needs to listen to his big daddy a little better.
Spin. These were never the weapons the US was looking for. In fact, almost every country in the area of the middle east, Europe, and North America have these weapons. They actually came from Western countries. O'reilly is a joke. He is a terrorist at times and a terrorist-sympathizer the rest of the time.
No it's not, a wmd creates massive devastation over a large area, like a biological agent or an extremely powerful explosive or radioactive material. You'd have to include CS gas in that category if you include mustard gas. It would only be a wmd if you made an impractically large bomb out of it. Not all illegal weapons are wmd's.
CS gas doesnt give you internal blistering as dos mustard.
But the real point is has someone got or not wmd, when whats relly important is has he the means to deliver it. Some types of wmd are relatively easy to make. the problem is taking it somewere
|GOVERMENT--Red China| |Dates--1949-1952,1957-1960,1966-1976| |Targets--Political opponents, Rural population, Enemies of the state| |"Gun Control Laws"--{ Act of Feb. 20, 1951} {Act of Oct. 22, 1957}|
|Features of Over-all "Gun Control" scheme---
Prison or death to "counter-revolutionary criminals" and anyone resisting any government program. Death penalty for suppling guns to such "criminals".|
Which nations are allowed to have weapons of mass destruction and what nations are not allowed. Is there a list or consensus? Should we make the U.N. sovereign over us?
these right wingers lie all the time it is unbelieveable they still argue there are wmds yet there aren't any they still argue the war was a good thing how can it be a good thing if innocent people die?
maybe buried near the 5-7 luxury cars, from saddams personal collection, just unearthed 2 months ago... can u imagine, hiding multiple cars(each car larger than the bombs we dropped on japan), for over 5 years...amazing.
hey, i'm gonna hide a semi-truck, here in michigan, and you and 50,000 friends, come find it.keep in mind i have access to heavy equipment,and michigan is less than half iraq
Ofcourse the ISG didn`t really want to find those WMDs. That could make the president look bad. Yeah right. You know there are more reliable sources than NewsMax which is the Pravda of the right-wing.
Proof that WMDs existed the liberals cant stand it. If a nulcear soaked chemical weapon were stuck up every liberals ass they would still say no WMDs. But then again liberals like hard dangerous things up thier asses
And conservatives still clinge to the hope that there were WMDs even when none is found. And by the way we all know that it is the conservatives who are closeted homosexuals. That is why they go out of their way with all the anti-gay initiatives to prove they are not.
What are you going to do in 3, 5 10 years when documents come out that Saddam hid and transferred his WMDs. Yes they didnt find any but nobody can account for his supposed destroyed wmds. So where are they?
this might be the first time i've seen sharpton make a good point. doesn't look like o'reilly will get the apology he was fishing for because as we all know, there were no wmd's. i think bill should apologize how about THAT? he's been sucking bush's dick but it's funny because now all of a sudden he's trying to distance himself from war support. fucking jerkoff.
I think Newt and O'Reilly are probably getting ready to go on a Sasquatch hunt. Because we all know the New York Times is lying about the beast's existence. Then O'Reilly (T-Warrior) can then demand that the "Paper of Record" apologize to those people who have always believed it exists. I can so see O'Reilly running Witch Trials with Newt as the prosecution. Witches and Sasquatches make as much sense as finding WMD after 3 years of occupying a country like Iraq.
Thanks for these clips!! OReilly is so scarey. This clip would be so much more precious if you HAD been able to clip onto the end the NEXT DAY'S NEWS proving OReilly WAS misinformed, as usual.
Even North Korea and Iran have WMD...probably much more than Saddam did, why was Iraq so special? All the war has done now is reduce Iraq to civil war - the Iraqi government can't deal with the ethnic cleansing, and the Iraqi army in some places is not properly managed...what's more, we now have a situation where Iran has a clear field in the middle east, with it's top enemy gone...
Whatever happened to diplomacy and intelligent leadership that understands reality? Or is that too "liberal"?
I didn't say once in any of my posts that older weapons justified the invasion did I? I said if its true, they were in violation(UN rules/laws). I never said, because of these findings it was justified that we went into Iraq. Don't put words in my mouth?Oh, & I wasn't talking about Bill being gutsy, I meant Santorum
What's your point? Gotcha Saddam on a technicality? There's no MD in these WMD. They're odds & ends picked up in 2s or 3s over the years by us. The UN resolution was always a Bush pretense for war. Even the US can't account for all our WMD. But if all this hooey isn't about justifying Bush's war then who cares?
@dawl23face The older weapons found were outdated munitions from the Iraq-Iran war and inncapeble of use as a chemical weapon, they had a usage life of about 3-5 years before they became outdated. The justification of war was that Saddam posesed chemical weapons and continued to attempt to aquire nuclear weapons. Because the "WMD" that were found could not actually be used as weapons, and were inncapeble of causing any destruction, let alone mass destruction, they cannot be in violation of 1441
Funny Bill calls this the "real deal". O'Really? The next day he dropped it. Pre-1991 is the key because we're not talking an on-going weapons program to justify Bush's invasion. Yeah, dawl23face, it takes a lot of "balls" for Bill to shill this line of bull.
Democrats do not apologize... they hide and go read with their little goofy glasses they wear and drink starbucks coffee and wait til they can make fun of the next move a leader makes...(cause God knows they can't create a true leader)
He needed to come out because no one else had the balls to do it. If no one came out and told us, and the democrats got word about it a few months later the Republican Party would be ripped to shreds. I'm not saying I agree 100% with everything my party does, maybe not even 80%. The bottom line is, no matter what they do, it's ALWAYS wrong.
The Pentagon has completely dismissed Santorum's 'new evidence' of WMD. http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--us-iraq0621jun21,0,1889258.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut
No one from the Pentagon dismissed the claims in that article?? What they ARE saying is that the WMD are probably old...but that doesn't matter. If it is true, which as of right now it is, then they are in violation. If you look at Rick's press release he never said the WMD are active or something.Part of his job is informing the American people of things/findings just like this. I don't believe he should be criticized for DOING HIS JOB.
Ugh....either I'm looking at a different article or you're illiterate...
"Santorum and Hoekstra released a newly declassified military intelligence report that said coalition forces have found 500 munitions in Iraq that contained degraded sarin or mustard nerve agents, produced before the 1991 Gulf War. But a defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the weapons were not considered likely to be dangerous because of their age."
It's like Fox/Santorum are upping the ante on their own Planet Bizzaro logic. They don't even mind that their breathless "reports" are immediately debunked, even by other conservatives. As long as they have something to blather about in front of those REALLY TIRED welcome-to-the-Nineties video graphics they're chill.
Tell me how O'Reilly is trying to "spin" this one?Five hundred chemical weapons have been found so me thinks the far left"Bush lied" crowd owe the president an apology.
O'Reilly never mentions that they were unuseable, or that Saddam posed no threat to the United States, as was the justification for the war. Plus there is the fact that Bush definitely did lie about Iraq trying to acquire WMD's from Africa in his State of the Union, even after the intelligence community told the White House that it wasn't true. When a president lies to his country, he deserves no apology.
Bill O'Reilly calls himself an "analyst". "I believe...""I think..." "I think the important thing..." "I don't think so..." "I think this is the real deal" are phrases telegraphing editorial, not analytical fact. By the time his show broadcast the Pentagon had already stated for the record these were not the WMD we went to war for. Bill couldn't be bothered to check with his Pentagon sources before his spew? It's interesting to note the next show O'Reilly dropped the topic entirely.
Methinks, smut1nz, that you owe the YT users an apology for maintaining sexploitative, race-exploitative, pathetic teen-smut videos in your "favorites" and expecting to be taken seriously by anyone.
This has been flagged as spam show
O'really a Catholic?
When Cardinal Ratzinger was asked whether a U.S. led war on Iraq would be “just war” he replied before it started: ”Certainly not… the damage would be greater than the values one hopes to save.”
When Cardinal Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI, he said during his Easter message in 2008: “Nothing positive comes from Iraq, torn apart by continual slaughter as the civil population flees…”
Maybe this guy needs to listen to his big daddy a little better.
LIBERTYALONE 3 weeks ago
Anyone else notice that when Bill started to describe what Rick Santorum said, Newt starting coughing? lol coincidence?
Carguy3492 3 weeks ago
Does anybody know when this aired? Any help would be great I'm referencing it for a uni assignment
Ksteve90 8 months ago
Liberals want it both way's!
When Clinton and Albright we're shouting from the U.N. roof top, that Saddam had WMD, the media drank it up.
Bush cleans up Clintons mess, and all you here is, "but, but...he ah, but, we ah..I never...ah...it wasn't...ah..."
kanukster 9 months ago
Spin. These were never the weapons the US was looking for. In fact, almost every country in the area of the middle east, Europe, and North America have these weapons. They actually came from Western countries. O'reilly is a joke. He is a terrorist at times and a terrorist-sympathizer the rest of the time.
SuperBunyon 1 year ago
Mustard gas is not a wmd, Bill
tacopylas 2 years ago
@tacopylas
yes it is.
paladinee 2 years ago
No it's not, a wmd creates massive devastation over a large area, like a biological agent or an extremely powerful explosive or radioactive material. You'd have to include CS gas in that category if you include mustard gas. It would only be a wmd if you made an impractically large bomb out of it. Not all illegal weapons are wmd's.
tacopylas 2 years ago
@tacopylas
them irak never had any wmd since it had used sarin , mustard, etc.
paladinee 2 years ago
@tacopylas
CS gas doesnt give you internal blistering as dos mustard.
But the real point is has someone got or not wmd, when whats relly important is has he the means to deliver it. Some types of wmd are relatively easy to make. the problem is taking it somewere
paladinee 2 years ago
America stop selling chemical weapons to those countries
dave777blaster 3 years ago
america, its time. lets restore the republic.
gyco7 3 years ago
the olny way to restore the republic,is to have another revolution.maby thats why they want guns "controled"
thegovamint 2 years ago
those who profit from war, can predict it.
gyco7 3 years ago
Did you know WMDs have been found in Iraq?
* 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
* 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents
* 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas)(5/06)
* Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas
* Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas,
assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency
This is only a PARTIAL LIST
arkivx1 3 years ago
DEATH BY GUN CONTROL
|GOVERMENT--Red China| |Dates--1949-1952,1957-1960,1966-1976| |Targets--Political opponents, Rural population, Enemies of the state| |"Gun Control Laws"--{ Act of Feb. 20, 1951} {Act of Oct. 22, 1957}|
|Features of Over-all "Gun Control" scheme---
Prison or death to "counter-revolutionary criminals" and anyone resisting any government program. Death penalty for suppling guns to such "criminals".|
|Civilans Killed---20-35 million|
AB12AC321 3 years ago
Which nations are allowed to have weapons of mass destruction and what nations are not allowed. Is there a list or consensus? Should we make the U.N. sovereign over us?
AB12AC321 3 years ago
this ass hole is CIA
natdrip 4 years ago
where are the weapons???
these right wingers lie all the time it is unbelieveable they still argue there are wmds yet there aren't any they still argue the war was a good thing how can it be a good thing if innocent people die?
RJWooller 4 years ago
Read Sada's book and you'll find out. You can't hide behind "Bush Lied" anymore. Get educate and do your own research.
dyamarick 3 years ago
maybe buried near the 5-7 luxury cars, from saddams personal collection, just unearthed 2 months ago... can u imagine, hiding multiple cars(each car larger than the bombs we dropped on japan), for over 5 years...amazing.
hey, i'm gonna hide a semi-truck, here in michigan, and you and 50,000 friends, come find it.keep in mind i have access to heavy equipment,and michigan is less than half iraq
dishdog215 3 years ago
More fake facts from O'Reilly! Shocking!!!
c692 4 years ago
Bill O' just pulls shit out of his ass, 24/7 on his show. Its practically a comedy show.
lazerous47 4 years ago
EVERYBODY!! Please watch this - the ULTIMATE clip on the WMD lies:
watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o
punkie999 4 years ago
THE "NO SPIN ZONE"
yeah sure.
ommmonet 4 years ago
Hehe. Seems Al Sharpton didn`t have to apologize after all.
ludd3di 4 years ago
Ofcourse the ISG didn`t really want to find those WMDs. That could make the president look bad. Yeah right. You know there are more reliable sources than NewsMax which is the Pravda of the right-wing.
ludd3di 4 years ago
Proof that WMDs existed the liberals cant stand it. If a nulcear soaked chemical weapon were stuck up every liberals ass they would still say no WMDs. But then again liberals like hard dangerous things up thier asses
leopold82 4 years ago
And conservatives still clinge to the hope that there were WMDs even when none is found. And by the way we all know that it is the conservatives who are closeted homosexuals. That is why they go out of their way with all the anti-gay initiatives to prove they are not.
ludd3di 4 years ago
What are you going to do in 3, 5 10 years when documents come out that Saddam hid and transferred his WMDs. Yes they didnt find any but nobody can account for his supposed destroyed wmds. So where are they?
leopold82 4 years ago
Fantasy land.
Spin land?
ommmonet 4 years ago
this might be the first time i've seen sharpton make a good point. doesn't look like o'reilly will get the apology he was fishing for because as we all know, there were no wmd's. i think bill should apologize how about THAT? he's been sucking bush's dick but it's funny because now all of a sudden he's trying to distance himself from war support. fucking jerkoff.
southyr6 4 years ago
THERE WERE NO WMD'S FOX = NAZI BUSH CHANNEL.
COME TO JULY 2007 on my site and you hear every evidents by the official testimonies and Scott Ritter Iraq wmd inspector.
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
THERE WERE NO WMD'S FOX = NAZI BUSH CHANNEL.
COME TO JULY 2007 on my site and you hear every evidents by the official testimonies and Scott Ritter Iraq wmd inspector.
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
eat shit and die...
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
GO FUCK YOUR SELF!
wwwPNACATTACKcom 4 years ago
100% BULLSHIT
wwwPNACATTACKcom 5 years ago
Bill is a hero to us! He is what we should model ourselves after! Anybody know where I can get a mistress that wont tell my wife and kids from?
yssarah 5 years ago
GO FUCK YOUR SELF!
wwwPNACATTACKcom 5 years ago
OREILLY IS A CULTURE WARRIOR!!! (and a sexual deviant)
daryoontdp 5 years ago
HE IS MORAN AND WAR MONGER like all neo-con and republivcan BUSH supporter scumms
wwwPNACATTACKcom 5 years ago
I think Newt and O'Reilly are probably getting ready to go on a Sasquatch hunt. Because we all know the New York Times is lying about the beast's existence. Then O'Reilly (T-Warrior) can then demand that the "Paper of Record" apologize to those people who have always believed it exists. I can so see O'Reilly running Witch Trials with Newt as the prosecution. Witches and Sasquatches make as much sense as finding WMD after 3 years of occupying a country like Iraq.
westphalianprinz 5 years ago
Thanks for these clips!! OReilly is so scarey. This clip would be so much more precious if you HAD been able to clip onto the end the NEXT DAY'S NEWS proving OReilly WAS misinformed, as usual.
tigerlily46514 5 years ago
Even North Korea and Iran have WMD...probably much more than Saddam did, why was Iraq so special? All the war has done now is reduce Iraq to civil war - the Iraqi government can't deal with the ethnic cleansing, and the Iraqi army in some places is not properly managed...what's more, we now have a situation where Iran has a clear field in the middle east, with it's top enemy gone...
Whatever happened to diplomacy and intelligent leadership that understands reality? Or is that too "liberal"?
adi87tya 5 years ago
People like him make me wish there really was a hell so that he could be sent to it.
BuckeyeNick09 5 years ago
I didn't say once in any of my posts that older weapons justified the invasion did I? I said if its true, they were in violation(UN rules/laws). I never said, because of these findings it was justified that we went into Iraq. Don't put words in my mouth?Oh, & I wasn't talking about Bill being gutsy, I meant Santorum
dawl23face 5 years ago
What's your point? Gotcha Saddam on a technicality? There's no MD in these WMD. They're odds & ends picked up in 2s or 3s over the years by us. The UN resolution was always a Bush pretense for war. Even the US can't account for all our WMD. But if all this hooey isn't about justifying Bush's war then who cares?
sknabt 5 years ago
@dawl23face The older weapons found were outdated munitions from the Iraq-Iran war and inncapeble of use as a chemical weapon, they had a usage life of about 3-5 years before they became outdated. The justification of war was that Saddam posesed chemical weapons and continued to attempt to aquire nuclear weapons. Because the "WMD" that were found could not actually be used as weapons, and were inncapeble of causing any destruction, let alone mass destruction, they cannot be in violation of 1441
iraqiblaze 6 months ago
Funny Bill calls this the "real deal". O'Really? The next day he dropped it. Pre-1991 is the key because we're not talking an on-going weapons program to justify Bush's invasion. Yeah, dawl23face, it takes a lot of "balls" for Bill to shill this line of bull.
sknabt 5 years ago
Democrats do not apologize... they hide and go read with their little goofy glasses they wear and drink starbucks coffee and wait til they can make fun of the next move a leader makes...(cause God knows they can't create a true leader)
mysteriowc 5 years ago
this is the 2nd addition to my comment below:
He needed to come out because no one else had the balls to do it. If no one came out and told us, and the democrats got word about it a few months later the Republican Party would be ripped to shreds. I'm not saying I agree 100% with everything my party does, maybe not even 80%. The bottom line is, no matter what they do, it's ALWAYS wrong.
dawl23face 5 years ago
The Pentagon has completely dismissed Santorum's 'new evidence' of WMD. http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--us-iraq0621jun21,0,1889258.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut
sknabt 5 years ago
No one from the Pentagon dismissed the claims in that article?? What they ARE saying is that the WMD are probably old...but that doesn't matter. If it is true, which as of right now it is, then they are in violation. If you look at Rick's press release he never said the WMD are active or something.Part of his job is informing the American people of things/findings just like this. I don't believe he should be criticized for DOING HIS JOB.
dawl23face 5 years ago
that was all for sknabt:
Ugh....either I'm looking at a different article or you're illiterate...
"Santorum and Hoekstra released a newly declassified military intelligence report that said coalition forces have found 500 munitions in Iraq that contained degraded sarin or mustard nerve agents, produced before the 1991 Gulf War. But a defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the weapons were not considered likely to be dangerous because of their age."
dawl23face 5 years ago
Hmm page not found.
dslmattman 5 years ago
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/14796363.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp
http://70.168.46.200/
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49297
These documents are all real and found right after the war.
Mo0ive1Us3er 5 years ago
BigOrangeTitan do you believe EVERY WORD THAT BULLSHIT
msnbc SAYS??? DO You Know that msnbc is a far left news network?
Mo0ive1Us3er 5 years ago
It's like Fox/Santorum are upping the ante on their own Planet Bizzaro logic. They don't even mind that their breathless "reports" are immediately debunked, even by other conservatives. As long as they have something to blather about in front of those REALLY TIRED welcome-to-the-Nineties video graphics they're chill.
friendlier 5 years ago
Tell me how O'Reilly is trying to "spin" this one?Five hundred chemical weapons have been found so me thinks the far left"Bush lied" crowd owe the president an apology.
smooth1nz 5 years ago
O'Reilly never mentions that they were unuseable, or that Saddam posed no threat to the United States, as was the justification for the war. Plus there is the fact that Bush definitely did lie about Iraq trying to acquire WMD's from Africa in his State of the Union, even after the intelligence community told the White House that it wasn't true. When a president lies to his country, he deserves no apology.
russman588 5 years ago
Bill O'Reilly calls himself an "analyst". "I believe...""I think..." "I think the important thing..." "I don't think so..." "I think this is the real deal" are phrases telegraphing editorial, not analytical fact. By the time his show broadcast the Pentagon had already stated for the record these were not the WMD we went to war for. Bill couldn't be bothered to check with his Pentagon sources before his spew? It's interesting to note the next show O'Reilly dropped the topic entirely.
sknabt 5 years ago
No, they dont owe Bush an apology after an intelligence official says "The U.S. didn't find WMD despite claims."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13480264/
BigOrangeTitan 5 years ago
Methinks, smut1nz, that you owe the YT users an apology for maintaining sexploitative, race-exploitative, pathetic teen-smut videos in your "favorites" and expecting to be taken seriously by anyone.
budavol 5 years ago
Three and a half years after this mistake commenced the cherry-picking continues. Have they no shame?
wonderfunk 5 years ago