winback 1 was my hero waiting to get a ps2 to play the second i cant wait...never followed reviews after seeeing silent hill 2 got like 7/10 lol...no kidding the game had no gameplay
i"there is a multiplayer mode but the problem with that is that youll have to find several people who actually enjoy this game" -i'm one of them hahaha
I loved winback 1 so much that when I saw this I just had to get it. Let me tell you, everything he says in this review is completely accurate. They wanted to have mgs-like gameplay but failed horribly. The multiplayer wouldn't be half bad, in fact it would be a reason to pick this up, if every map wasn't a box, I kid you not every map is a damn box that is no bigger than a few feet. If you're too close to your opponent you can't melee, but to escape being shot you can run circles around them..
I hate these people. Don't understand games! Don't like Kirby or Earthbound. DOn't like cool games. Only games like Black Ops and Halo Reach. They are good games though.
@VictorTheSuperHero It's not just them. It's the same problem with mainstream reviewers in general whether its IGN, GameSpot, or Game Informer. And DON'T even think about getting me started with G4 who is probably dead now. If any mainstream reviewer these days that can appreciate games such as Kirby and/or Earthbound is Nintendo Power. Why? Despite the fact that NP is the ONLY mainstream source where you can find complete UNBIASED reviews, at the least bit, they have 100% dedication.
running and shooting is SO OVERRATED! Really now, all it does is make games way to easy. I swear, it ruined the MGS franchise for me. I'm so sick of reviewers wanting every single game to be exactly the same thing
@FlameAdder sorry let me reword that, By run and shoot I meant be able to aim and shoot (like a max payne style game). Basically what I saying is no one seems to like games like MGS2 and 3, syphon filter, and dead to rights were you need to stop in place to do percise aiming (I'm not encluding the atuo that you can move and shoot in)
@FlameAdder never said that either. All i'm saying is it seems what was loved 4 years ago is now hated in todays market, and i don't find that to be right.
wow, this game looks like it sucks so bad! Number one is the shit though. By the way, how the hell can you suck on voice overs?! I might take up on it because you get paid to just change your voice. That's easy as hell !
"Their attributes are completely identical, which begs the question, why even have multiple characters?"
Oblivious reviewer is oblivious!
How ironic that the makes such a stupid statement under the 'story' section of the review.... Uhh, I dunno... Maybe the story? Because different characters add to the depth and ambience of the game regardless of what they fucking perform. Sheva doesn't run any quicker than Chris, I guess RE5 gets a -450,000 out of 10 for story according to this idiot.
Whoever reviewed this game was serious coming off of a serious high,hitting an all time low and happened upon this game and decided to rip it to shreds.
I've played Koei games, and they all have a production value, although limited, is not quiet perfect, but for KOEI's humbled beginnings would make it an honorable attempt at making a decent game.
Considering KOEI's humbled beginnings.
Koei should seriously look into some business management hiring and become the next ubisoft.
@BillyCauseyjr I meant RE4 wasnt survival horror. But Ill agree with you about RE3, it was atleast still fun to kill zombies, instead of knife wielding spaniards.
"Okay, watch this video... you can't do any of that"... I'm giving a good 'ole' fuck you to that! When was the last time you could EVER fucking do even one forth of the shit characters do in action scenes during the actual game play in any god damn game. DICK!!!
i don't really give a shit if i can't do the things they show in cinema, i can't do the cinema things they show in resident evil and it dosen't frustrate me. I appreciate simple tactical games like this, whithout alot of hype. but this dick wants to compare it to his favorite games. reviewing games is bullshit, at least ripping it like this anyway. reviews are for people who can't make a game or don't know what they want, or its just a money thing.
I know what you mean, those thumbs downs you got DIDNT matter and still dont. You are 100% right, I saw this and bought it because its very similar to MGS type gameplay, and it has multiplayer which MGS doesnt, this game sucks with everything except multiplayer
You missed the point entirely. I know this game sucks. But Kane and Lynch ALSO sucks, but is almost the exact same game that this one is just with better graphics and repetitive use of the word "fuck", yet they give that game a good score, which makes them hypocrites.
hold on now that i look back on this, the reviewer who critiqed this game is actually pretty stupid, the games based on tactical movements, cover shooting is what you do and the opening movie was just an over exaggeration, just something to make it look cool, the graphics are good and if you run out without looking or getting cover you deserve to get shot, fucking critics....
The critics are partly right though. It's hard with the controls to move from cover to cover. It's sad that you can't use grenades and enemy AL is "too smart for you"! Also, no checkpoints? The original game had checkpoints but this one didn't? The voice acting sounded more like that annoying Microsoft Sam does. My last remark is this, the story is the same. They just tossed in some more details that might not have been necessary.
I agree with sukotu that this is a cover shoot game because that's one of the reason this game was very cool to begin with. I think the problem was is that it didn't use creative ways to cover and shoot. For example, shooting in close and wide range areas allowing for sniper gun battles, levels with different landscapes, destructible cover areas like thin boxes,etc.
winback 1 was my hero waiting to get a ps2 to play the second i cant wait...never followed reviews after seeeing silent hill 2 got like 7/10 lol...no kidding the game had no gameplay
ReaLSorrY 3 weeks ago
the way characters are explained "they all play the same way not one is faster or better sniper" sounds a lot like call of duty
lokalllize 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"how is this a sequel there is no real connection between it and the first one "
That's a very good question. This review is right about everything on this game
AmbassadorJediSpock 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i"there is a multiplayer mode but the problem with that is that youll have to find several people who actually enjoy this game" -i'm one of them hahaha
erick308058 3 months ago
how is this a sequel there is no real connection between it and the first one
GeneralCodeBlue 5 months ago 2
@echocompany666 The ps2 version did, but it was pretty bad(like most games from that time). I like the original on N64.
Metaldisciple666999 6 months ago
3:21 Snake? SNAAAAAAAKKKKEEE!!!!!!!! oh wait... wrong game
stfanani 7 months ago 2
I loved winback 1 so much that when I saw this I just had to get it. Let me tell you, everything he says in this review is completely accurate. They wanted to have mgs-like gameplay but failed horribly. The multiplayer wouldn't be half bad, in fact it would be a reason to pick this up, if every map wasn't a box, I kid you not every map is a damn box that is no bigger than a few feet. If you're too close to your opponent you can't melee, but to escape being shot you can run circles around them..
KnapyPuppy 8 months ago 2
no not much when you choose multiplayer and you just use 1 joystick it will say 3 com 2 com 1 com
MrFantasyn 8 months ago
The first winback was one of the most underrated games I've ever seen.
DiSimoes 10 months ago 2
Wait till winback 3 suckers.....
fpsologist 11 months ago
pretty much the first winback with better graphics
kenseisato1989 11 months ago
I hate these people. Don't understand games! Don't like Kirby or Earthbound. DOn't like cool games. Only games like Black Ops and Halo Reach. They are good games though.
VictorTheSuperHero 11 months ago
@VictorTheSuperHero It's not just them. It's the same problem with mainstream reviewers in general whether its IGN, GameSpot, or Game Informer. And DON'T even think about getting me started with G4 who is probably dead now. If any mainstream reviewer these days that can appreciate games such as Kirby and/or Earthbound is Nintendo Power. Why? Despite the fact that NP is the ONLY mainstream source where you can find complete UNBIASED reviews, at the least bit, they have 100% dedication.
-KT
kibjohn 11 months ago
@kibjohn amen, and this game wasnt so good, but not that bad i like it
VictorTheSuperHero 11 months ago
running and shooting is SO OVERRATED! Really now, all it does is make games way to easy. I swear, it ruined the MGS franchise for me. I'm so sick of reviewers wanting every single game to be exactly the same thing
noideac 1 year ago
You've been able to run and shoot ever since the original Metal Gear, hope that helps.
FlameAdder 10 months ago
@FlameAdder sorry let me reword that, By run and shoot I meant be able to aim and shoot (like a max payne style game). Basically what I saying is no one seems to like games like MGS2 and 3, syphon filter, and dead to rights were you need to stop in place to do percise aiming (I'm not encluding the atuo that you can move and shoot in)
noideac 10 months ago
That's right, nobody liked MGS2 or 3.
FlameAdder 10 months ago
@FlameAdder never said that either. All i'm saying is it seems what was loved 4 years ago is now hated in todays market, and i don't find that to be right.
noideac 10 months ago
"Basically what I saying is no one seems to like games like MGS2 and 3"
You fail at both grammar and backpedaling.
FlameAdder 10 months ago
@noideac What are you talking about lol, MGS2 and MGS3 were big games.
TrueSin12 10 months ago
what happened to jean-luc :( is craig taking over as him now? dont forget this came our like 3 or 4 years ago so its not there fault
iamjuniorduh 1 year ago
what happened to jean-luc :( is craig taking over as him now?
iamjuniorduh 1 year ago
I have the original on N64 and PS2. I have not played this yet, and don't plan on either.
oldfartguy 1 year ago
im gonna buy this gam!!! :D
MJfan101ism 1 year ago
it's ridiculous how the old gametrailers was actually better than the new one...
Majsz 1 year ago
wat a waste lol jajajaja
part 1 is better den this
pecker92 1 year ago
wow, this game looks like it sucks so bad! Number one is the shit though. By the way, how the hell can you suck on voice overs?! I might take up on it because you get paid to just change your voice. That's easy as hell !
1992824K 1 year ago
DAMMIT DON'T DO THIS! NOT NOW NICK!
Zain844 1 year ago
"Their attributes are completely identical, which begs the question, why even have multiple characters?"
Oblivious reviewer is oblivious!
How ironic that the makes such a stupid statement under the 'story' section of the review.... Uhh, I dunno... Maybe the story? Because different characters add to the depth and ambience of the game regardless of what they fucking perform. Sheva doesn't run any quicker than Chris, I guess RE5 gets a -450,000 out of 10 for story according to this idiot.
UberToober 1 year ago 2
i bought this game for 3 bucks at game stop it iz shitty but ima try to beat it for shits and giggles.
noobthizz33 1 year ago
The reviewer is so funny xD
Aloverssoulz 1 year ago
Whoever reviewed this game was serious coming off of a serious high,hitting an all time low and happened upon this game and decided to rip it to shreds.
I've played Koei games, and they all have a production value, although limited, is not quiet perfect, but for KOEI's humbled beginnings would make it an honorable attempt at making a decent game.
Considering KOEI's humbled beginnings.
Koei should seriously look into some business management hiring and become the next ubisoft.
Nexstarcrazyness 1 year ago 2
why is that i like games like this...
no matter how bad the rating is i still play it and actually enjoy it i probably got a fucked up taste in games :P
RW00632 1 year ago 2
They paid em to be bad at it.
TronDevlin 2 years ago
This game is like....... ugh.
Rly repatitive...... and just very bland.
metalsnake27 2 years ago
Most Japanese games, even the good ones cant do "run & gun" very well. (remember RE5?)
samthing
STOP
AIM
SHOOT
REPEAT
Thus why I'm glad that Blue Castle dev team brought this up about CapCom games CEO, and why I'm glad that Blue Castle is making "Dead Rising 2"
ACTORnSCREENWRITER 2 years ago
RE5 isn't meant to be a "run & gun" type of game. It's supposed to be survival-horror....
Damail 1 year ago
@Damail
It hasnt been survival horror since RE4.
Darien331 1 year ago
@Darien331 I'll dissagree, since RE2. 3 gave you so much ammo and 4 was just a zombie killing fest.
BillyCauseyjr 1 year ago
@BillyCauseyjr I meant RE4 wasnt survival horror. But Ill agree with you about RE3, it was atleast still fun to kill zombies, instead of knife wielding spaniards.
Darien331 1 year ago
I loved Winback 1 as a kid, never bought this one....never will.
inksuckeye1 2 years ago 6
@inksuckeye1 how come
lokalllize 1 month ago
bbad game
MrMatu2t 2 years ago
Blatant MGS clone. Koei sucks monkey nuts. They haven't made a single decent game.
XionXi 2 years ago
"Okay, watch this video... you can't do any of that"... I'm giving a good 'ole' fuck you to that! When was the last time you could EVER fucking do even one forth of the shit characters do in action scenes during the actual game play in any god damn game. DICK!!!
muertopordentro 2 years ago 3
Why? WHY?! Why Is The Voice Acting So DAMN HORRIBLE?!?!?!?!??!?!
bcoz7264 2 years ago
Its KOEI c'mon
Look for Dynasty Warriors 3 "maaaaaaaagic" video clip
Feijoada1 2 years ago
Whats that have to do with anything?
bcoz7264 2 years ago
It means its commonplace for Koei games to have horrible dubbing
Feijoada1 2 years ago
"You can't do any of that" lmfao. Winback 1 had the coolest soundtrack.
xAS5ASSINx 2 years ago
The game over screen is definitely ripped off from Metal Gear. It's an okay game, the original is one of my fave N64 games.
KazuoKiriyama666 2 years ago
Agreed. The first one was the original and BEST
-kidThunder
kibjohn 2 years ago
Are there any bots in the multiplayer?
CineRecon 2 years ago
I loved this and the first one.
higarashimangaman85 2 years ago
i don't really give a shit if i can't do the things they show in cinema, i can't do the cinema things they show in resident evil and it dosen't frustrate me. I appreciate simple tactical games like this, whithout alot of hype. but this dick wants to compare it to his favorite games. reviewing games is bullshit, at least ripping it like this anyway. reviews are for people who can't make a game or don't know what they want, or its just a money thing.
zekestevens 2 years ago
Rofl, these older GT reviews are so much funnier than the new ones.
Raidou10k 2 years ago
apperently this game sux if you even look it up theres a review and trailer thats it and its 2009
ares5566 2 years ago
Comment removed
CyberNinja7 2 years ago
I haven't played this one but it looks crap! Winback 1 is well better!
davidwellard 2 years ago
Bastard!
-flee-
Xenocidal 2 years ago
Well, in my opinion, I think Winback 1 was WAY better. Though the graphics didn't have much, the remake makes up for that, right?
Winback 2, it's just the same thing over and over. I mean, it's stupid, you shoot a bomb to defuse it.
The interface looks a BIT better, but almost the same.
TheNinjaBrothers 3 years ago
LMAO 2:23
clipsahoii 3 years ago 2
WOW. . .
well - people say that both are rips of metal gear.
well - not really - winback and mg were both out at the basically the same time.
and winback on 64 was much better.
this winback . . . . .
dissapointed - i almost bought this crap just because i was big fan on the first one.
they should have Epic remake this game - see what they can come up with.
don't get me started on the Tonka truck voice acting.
wow
talltness 3 years ago
yep you're so right metal gear solid and winback came out at the same time. '97 and '99 aren't that far apart no sir 'e bob
TimeSpliTT 3 years ago
Man, I just agree with you 100%
DiSimoes 2 years ago
both win backs are mgs rip offs. the protagonist in both of them even looks like snake!
tEkToNiK 3 years ago
I know what you mean, those thumbs downs you got DIDNT matter and still dont. You are 100% right, I saw this and bought it because its very similar to MGS type gameplay, and it has multiplayer which MGS doesnt, this game sucks with everything except multiplayer
MGS forever
MaxiMachine 2 years ago
winback 1 is better....i beat it like 9 times...its awesome!!
thugftw 3 years ago 3
this game sucked i didnt even finish it. you guys know this is basically where gears of war got their style from
casketgrind 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
fzerogx7 3 years ago
the narrator is funny. :)
excelkid99 3 years ago
Tottaly agreed Winback 1 is soooooooo much better!!!!!!!!
Tesshu2288 3 years ago 5
Man, Winback 1 is was so good...
NonDairyYogurt 3 years ago
I find it funny how they rate this shit, but gave Kane and Lynch a fucking 8/10.
fuckallnazislol 3 years ago 9
Every website gave this game a low rating. Why? Because it SUCKS! Get over it.
anthonygamer 3 years ago
You missed the point entirely. I know this game sucks. But Kane and Lynch ALSO sucks, but is almost the exact same game that this one is just with better graphics and repetitive use of the word "fuck", yet they give that game a good score, which makes them hypocrites.
fuckallnazislol 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
thats just an opinion
NejiKusa 3 years ago
win i got a n64 this game was my favorite but they really screwed up the 2 one numbnuts srewing w/ a good game
planbtechdeckgod 3 years ago
I loved the first, but, this one made me sad.
illogicalexistence 3 years ago 2
"there is a multiplayer mode but the problem with that is that youll have to find several people who actually enjoy this game"
hahaha!!!
NtudaI 3 years ago 11
Koei is definitely the worst developer to be moderately successful at creating franchises.
sugreev2001 3 years ago
the narrarator sounds like davedays
dontplaycreate 4 years ago
bad
murillobolentine 4 years ago
this game is fukn shit i hate it.
part 1 was soo good y did they have to ruin it? i hope they can make up 4 it if they decide to make part 3 wich i hope they do
italianb0y01 4 years ago 5
hold on now that i look back on this, the reviewer who critiqed this game is actually pretty stupid, the games based on tactical movements, cover shooting is what you do and the opening movie was just an over exaggeration, just something to make it look cool, the graphics are good and if you run out without looking or getting cover you deserve to get shot, fucking critics....
Sukotu 4 years ago
The critics are partly right though. It's hard with the controls to move from cover to cover. It's sad that you can't use grenades and enemy AL is "too smart for you"! Also, no checkpoints? The original game had checkpoints but this one didn't? The voice acting sounded more like that annoying Microsoft Sam does. My last remark is this, the story is the same. They just tossed in some more details that might not have been necessary.
dessertmonkeyjk 4 years ago 2
I agree with sukotu that this is a cover shoot game because that's one of the reason this game was very cool to begin with. I think the problem was is that it didn't use creative ways to cover and shoot. For example, shooting in close and wide range areas allowing for sniper gun battles, levels with different landscapes, destructible cover areas like thin boxes,etc.
AgentCell 4 years ago
i see the sequel is as hard as ever, the changes seem to have made it worse?
Sukotu 4 years ago
I hate that u have to play each lvl twice it sucks
metalsnake27 4 years ago 2
really D:;?
Sukotu 4 years ago