Would love to split this guy's lip and knock that ironic smirk off his face. This clueless tool is not qualified to be a music journalist. This guy promotes trash and doesn't know a thing outside his hipster circle of goons and fashion dead-beats. Watch your back Miller, you're going to hit the pavement and it's not going to be pretty.
This guy is a total douche bag and he doesn't know shit about music journalism. I would very much like to bust his lip open and knock that pretentious smirk off his clueless face. As a matter of factly, if I see this guy on the street I'm going to do just that. Watch your back you slimy turd of a cavity. People like you need to go down.
This guy is a total douche bag and he doesn't know shit about music journalism. I would very much like to bust his lip open and knock that pretentious smirk off his clueless face. As a matter of factly, if I see this guy on the street I'm going to do just that. Watch your back you slimy turd of a cavity. People like you need to go down.
it's not just about nme it's about this whole part of the music industry. what they do isn't what music should be about. this whole competing-each-other-charts-and-prizes shit. music should connect the people and you can't connect with competing and rivalling.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow alex miller....what a twat, i guess he has to be to write for nme, maybe thats harsh especially if he was pissed and hadnt slept but he does come off badly in the interview, like the klaxons most probably did deserve the award, they fall short live though which is a shame
klaxons original? best in decades? i guess no one hear has listened to godpseed you black emperor! f#a#0o or iFoward Russia! give me a wall or even iLiKETRAiNS progress reform ep now those are bands with new ideas
yeah, but GYBE! are "on hiatus", forward russia couldn't follow "give me a wall" and no-one's ever heard of iLIKETRAINS - so I guess Klaxons are all we've got...
not really theres plenty of original bands in britian and the world try jeniferever! just cause a band are unknown doesnt mean there not worth listening to!
A talented journalist, but Klaxons are one of the most over-rated bands of the 00's. I've listened to that album many times and although there are new ideas, the songs are horribly average. "What British music has been waiting for, for the past 15 years"? What a joke.
klaxsons was better on the night?! they worn fucking old school Greek armor there nothing but art school ponses there albums shit, there shit live, and the NME have bin tools for years who love to plug shit bands.
I didnt like the klaxons record as much as winehouses. It all mushed into the same stuff. It makes sense that it got mediocre reviews from other newspapers. Oh well. Amy has a bit of a chance at the grammys for album of the year.
Klaxons are always referred to as a three piece band... I don't think they count Stef as a member, seeing as he only plays drumss on one of the album tracks.
klaxons aside i think that nme should think very carefully about who they let appear on television, because this alex miller fellow is a prat. style over substance is mostly prevalent in nme it used to be a magazine of some credibility well written, and far reaching. Conor mcnicholas is the problem.
frenchkids, judging by your remark "style over substance is mostly prevalent in NME", you read nme regularly. If this is this case, then surely you have read their immense slagging off of Alex Millers performance on telly, even advising readers to watch it on youtube because they would find it funny?? (im not saying i agree with everything NME does, and this reply has nothing at all to do with whether or not i like the klaxons)...
i once read nme however i stopped when it became bullshit (about 4 years ago) sorry if i offended you. My opinion on the matter does not seem to be shared on this particular page. By any chance do you own any glowsticks. Merry xmasxx
NME is a poor magazine, every new band is "the next big band" but I agree with them on the Klaxons front, they did deserve to win and very true comment about their music being something new rather than amy winehouse who just sings songs that could have been out in the 60s/70s
cliched scenesters? Does anybody talk like that apart from contrived middle class NME writers. Your campaign to get the Sex Pistols to number one didn't do very well did it - shows that NME has no relevance anymore on popular culture.
stupid nme cunt. the truly "forward-thinking" musicians dont get covered by your glorified-smash-hits of a rag because the 15-year-old retards that buy it wouldn't be able to handle it. nme is haircuts, clothing styles (they had a fucking "how to dress like brandon flowers, sponsored by topshop" feature once) and idiotic "scenes" that these cockends invent for themselves.
no, in fact he's right...media poisons everything that's good, specially NME, so yaa, the Klaxons are fucked, or they'll be like that soon. They'll launch the indie rave genre into fame...the price? just think of the Emo kids of today and the Emo kids ten years ago.
Don't get me wrong, i like the Klaxons. But saying they deserved to win over winehouse because they made a "Forward thinking record", in a genre that uses the word "Rave" to describe itself. C'mon wtf? They're a pack of indie chancers.
I was at first very put off Klaxons by this "new-rave" thing i heard bandied about. But its not actually them that call themselves that, its a shit genre that NME have invented up to sell magazines and set a new trend, and they have just happened to use Klaxons to be the figurehead of this new genre because they are young and talented. I then listened to Klaxons without thinking of this NME bullshit and realised they are a truly gifted band and really did deserve to win this by quite a long way.
I think that hair and cloths comment is very justified especially considering that cunt works for NME proably the worst culprit of makeing music not about the music, but nevermind.
Is this bloke for real. Klaxon's record was ok but Back to Black IS the defining album of the past year and Amy wiped the floor with everyone performance wise. W***er!
Ha! I don't know what to laugh louder at - Klaxon's winning the Mercury which has to be the biggest joke of the year - or Alex Miller proving that all NME writers are total cunts
I think Bat for Lashes should have won. I see what Alex's point is about The Klaxons being more on the tip of where music has been for the last 12 months, but thats mainly because NME put them there by promoting this shambolic "new rave" genre. The Klaxons are ace, new-rave is just a term coined by NME to set a new trend which will soon be forgotton, although the Klaxons won't. Good on you guys.
After listening extensively to both albums i retract the comment that bat for lashes should have won. Klaxons deserve this by a long long way. Bat for lashes main strength in the production, Klaxons have it all!
Actually, I think it was Klaxons that called it new rave first. They then decided that it wasn't a very good idea and said that their album would just be pop, and have since banned glowsticks at their concerts, which is a minor tragedy. Oh well.
I'm glad they won. I like the fact they get their awards drunk and probably hight on MDMA. They might be arty pretentious wankers (good on them, who wants to be boring twats like Futureheads?) but at least they're not arrogant heinous pricks like Johnny Borel from Razorlight. And to all the people who thinks Bat For The Lashes should have won it, I tell them Wrong, The Horrors should have won it!
sockironer your a mug, they dont even like being under the nu-rave genre. some idiot made it up and stuck it in a magazine and people followed. klaxons acctually say there not nu-rave and dont wanna be. they only dress illuminous cause they like to put on a good show and stand out as they say in there interviews.
I'm pretty sure that the term was coined by some feller at Kitsune - to describe them - they openly embraced the term until it was adopted by the mainstream. Fair enough if you like them, you like them, and if you don't, you don't - but c'mon - they don't come much more hypocritical than the NME, thats something that no one can deny...
the comments seem to point to the fact that the pretentious fuckwits embraced the term till it became popular (wot clever art rockers),as for being a mug,fair enough, Im a mug for not buying how great the fucking klaxons are, they still need a good kick in the head (before being carted off to a BUPA hospital on the back of mumsy wumsys medical insurance),and having to resort to illuminous clothes to stand out/put on a good show? err,dig your own hole mate,lol
"Rave" band (Nu-Rave being new wave music/old rave fashion - obviously forward thinking) win "prestigious" award, keyboard player chewing it up like Pac Man, NME sucks up to big time - you can even see a little fleck of shit on his nose (surprise). How left-field...
I cant watch, its like crawling thru shit to get to your mums funeral,even the NME editor is trying not to say how fucking abhorrent these pricks are,,how can you make a 'forward thinking album' whilst simultaneously trying to con old ravers into thinking your 'new rave',,Im sorry to spew such hate but these lads are pretensious wankers
HAHAHHAHAHA i love Klaxons...Love Jamie..lol too drunk
DanijelaKretena 4 months ago
oh shut up I love him!
pafculka 1 year ago
He's a dick, she's stupid
Pookie4795 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
v v v Raging
GodhandXo 1 year ago
Would love to split this guy's lip and knock that ironic smirk off his face. This clueless tool is not qualified to be a music journalist. This guy promotes trash and doesn't know a thing outside his hipster circle of goons and fashion dead-beats. Watch your back Miller, you're going to hit the pavement and it's not going to be pretty.
MrComingtogetyouable 1 year ago
This guy is a total douche bag and he doesn't know shit about music journalism. I would very much like to bust his lip open and knock that pretentious smirk off his clueless face. As a matter of factly, if I see this guy on the street I'm going to do just that. Watch your back you slimy turd of a cavity. People like you need to go down.
MrComingtogetyouable 1 year ago
This guy is a total douche bag and he doesn't know shit about music journalism. I would very much like to bust his lip open and knock that pretentious smirk off his clueless face. As a matter of factly, if I see this guy on the street I'm going to do just that. Watch your back you slimy turd of a cavity. People like you need to go down.
MrComingtogetyouable 1 year ago
hahahahahahah
benjaminrichardshoop 1 year ago
it's like the newsreaders are proud of being total squares
andydsmith 2 years ago 2
nme is gash as fuck, but that was funny.
Ryn2k8 2 years ago
in some awkward way, that was one of the greatest things I've ever seen.
soigeneration 2 years ago
he slaughtered her!
daveboy2810 2 years ago
lmao @ the presenter laughing at 2:32.
angularstudios 2 years ago
gosh. alex miller is a class prat. if i liked him i might laugh but he's such a boring, morbid cunt.
VeeDubTom04 3 years ago
is jamies the lead singer? I though it was james
dykeeniesloveu 3 years ago
you can tell by how much the other news guy is laughing that he thinks the womans a bitch hahaha
todaysgrey 3 years ago
how pilled up were klaxons
did u see jamie trying to knaw off his face
lol
x
adsmylie 3 years ago
lol gurning away:D
FraterO 3 years ago
nme sucks dick
IGotProducedIn1989 3 years ago
why does nme suck dick? i've never read it, just wondering
Fran100 3 years ago
it's not just about nme it's about this whole part of the music industry. what they do isn't what music should be about. this whole competing-each-other-charts-and-prizes shit. music should connect the people and you can't connect with competing and rivalling.
IGotProducedIn1989 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow alex miller....what a twat, i guess he has to be to write for nme, maybe thats harsh especially if he was pissed and hadnt slept but he does come off badly in the interview, like the klaxons most probably did deserve the award, they fall short live though which is a shame
pissoffIsthistaken 3 years ago
klaxons original? best in decades? i guess no one hear has listened to godpseed you black emperor! f#a#0o or iFoward Russia! give me a wall or even iLiKETRAiNS progress reform ep now those are bands with new ideas
mrcat1990 3 years ago
yeah, but GYBE! are "on hiatus", forward russia couldn't follow "give me a wall" and no-one's ever heard of iLIKETRAINS - so I guess Klaxons are all we've got...
mAttthhheaLy 3 years ago
not really theres plenty of original bands in britian and the world try jeniferever! just cause a band are unknown doesnt mean there not worth listening to!
mrcat1990 2 years ago
dude, i never said iLiKETRAiNS were bad because they were unknown. i fucking love them haha.
mAttthhheaLy 2 years ago
tbh he seems to have it spot on
Grahamh18 3 years ago
A talented journalist, but Klaxons are one of the most over-rated bands of the 00's. I've listened to that album many times and although there are new ideas, the songs are horribly average. "What British music has been waiting for, for the past 15 years"? What a joke.
sebbster2000 3 years ago
'horribly average' - are you serious? then what music is not average according to you?
ouchdoesithurt 3 years ago
Not average? The Beatles.
Chillax dude, I'm entitled to my own opinions and if you don't agree then fair enough.
sebbster2000 3 years ago
But The Beatles are not from the 00's.
I'm not being agressive, just wondering really. Over the internet it's hard to see.
ouchdoesithurt 3 years ago
Ok, Portugal. The man
sebbster2000 3 years ago
klaxsons was better on the night?! they worn fucking old school Greek armor there nothing but art school ponses there albums shit, there shit live, and the NME have bin tools for years who love to plug shit bands.
shinzu12 3 years ago
awh hes such a prick lol
iheartmusicXx 3 years ago
what a n00b that reporter is...
and aye, 3 peice? what about Steffan?
amy winehouse and klaxons cant be compared. No way. They are both different and Klaxons are everything that horseface is not.
NathanvanH 3 years ago
Alex Miller is a sad condesceding twat. She was right look at his fuckin ponce hair! And he is what? a music journo?
pajo1981 3 years ago
that guy has balls
edwetenhall123 3 years ago
amy winehouse is pants
emsrose92 4 years ago 2
I didnt like the klaxons record as much as winehouses. It all mushed into the same stuff. It makes sense that it got mediocre reviews from other newspapers. Oh well. Amy has a bit of a chance at the grammys for album of the year.
ChrisLovesGreys 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AlEx MiLLeR is SuCh a jEr"K LoLz i HaTe tHe KaCkSOnz dEy iZ WeLL ShiT YeH dAt `GuY' LoOkz LiKe a GaY aNne RoBiNsOn
dantract 4 years ago
brilliant!
thefezbrigade 4 years ago 6
That's funny. That news reader is a bit mean,isn't she?
mathstextbook45 4 years ago 3
alex miller is jokes and shes a toss pot for thinking all modern music is all hair and clothes.
rawskins 4 years ago 12
HAHA holy fuck, Alex Miller = Genius.
emzdiz 4 years ago 3
THREE piece band?
she's no done her research then!
downinallbion 4 years ago
Klaxons are always referred to as a three piece band... I don't think they count Stef as a member, seeing as he only plays drumss on one of the album tracks.
eskimogirl 4 years ago
haha :)
ANDYphoenix1993 4 years ago
ALEX MILLER es EL TIO MAS GUAY DEL MUNDO DE CARA
bahiakids 4 years ago
klaxons aside i think that nme should think very carefully about who they let appear on television, because this alex miller fellow is a prat. style over substance is mostly prevalent in nme it used to be a magazine of some credibility well written, and far reaching. Conor mcnicholas is the problem.
frenchkids 4 years ago
frenchkids, judging by your remark "style over substance is mostly prevalent in NME", you read nme regularly. If this is this case, then surely you have read their immense slagging off of Alex Millers performance on telly, even advising readers to watch it on youtube because they would find it funny?? (im not saying i agree with everything NME does, and this reply has nothing at all to do with whether or not i like the klaxons)...
PrincessKaty 4 years ago 2
i once read nme however i stopped when it became bullshit (about 4 years ago) sorry if i offended you. My opinion on the matter does not seem to be shared on this particular page. By any chance do you own any glowsticks. Merry xmasxx
frenchkids 4 years ago
i dont own any glowsticks, i am not a big klaxons fan if thats what u mean... nor am i one of those wankers who takes everything NME writes as gospel
PrincessKaty 4 years ago
haha, i owned some
but they ran out of glow :(
ANDYphoenix1993 4 years ago
freeze them.
AndrewBagel 4 years ago
NME is a poor magazine, every new band is "the next big band" but I agree with them on the Klaxons front, they did deserve to win and very true comment about their music being something new rather than amy winehouse who just sings songs that could have been out in the 60s/70s
michaelbuckley 4 years ago
god i sound like an arselicker on that last comment...no klaxons are good though
loowish 4 years ago
hah that was good... alex miller is smart...
anyone who says nme has no revelance to popular culture has obviously not read the magazine for the past 3 years at least
loowish 4 years ago
cliched scenesters? Does anybody talk like that apart from contrived middle class NME writers. Your campaign to get the Sex Pistols to number one didn't do very well did it - shows that NME has no relevance anymore on popular culture.
timmaximo 4 years ago
hahaa
i love naive middle aged people!!!
emathebrave 4 years ago 2
NME sucks the scrot and only knows about the shitty indie genre, idiotic cunts
andymc32 4 years ago
you can f*ck of too
psipsina7 4 years ago
yay! klaxons won!
FUNandBRi 4 years ago
Alex Miller is SO pretentious
doctoroddity 4 years ago 4
ah fack off
psipsina7 4 years ago
stupid nme cunt. the truly "forward-thinking" musicians dont get covered by your glorified-smash-hits of a rag because the 15-year-old retards that buy it wouldn't be able to handle it. nme is haircuts, clothing styles (they had a fucking "how to dress like brandon flowers, sponsored by topshop" feature once) and idiotic "scenes" that these cockends invent for themselves.
khalithistle 4 years ago
How pretentious of you.
PsychoSurreal 4 years ago
no, in fact he's right...media poisons everything that's good, specially NME, so yaa, the Klaxons are fucked, or they'll be like that soon. They'll launch the indie rave genre into fame...the price? just think of the Emo kids of today and the Emo kids ten years ago.
xNelsx 4 years ago 2
PWNT
volcanoofsushi 4 years ago 3
xD amy totally got pwned didnt she xD
simionTheOne 4 years ago
KLAXONS R DA SIKKLEST BAND YEH
AND R WAY BETTR THAN AMY WINEHOUSE
she is prety sik but klaxons desurv
it she won bare lodes of de prize tings
yeh and NME r zikeds!!!!
MCbrapzzz 4 years ago
hell yea
simionTheOne 4 years ago
Don't get me wrong, i like the Klaxons. But saying they deserved to win over winehouse because they made a "Forward thinking record", in a genre that uses the word "Rave" to describe itself. C'mon wtf? They're a pack of indie chancers.
ianfleming3264 4 years ago
I was at first very put off Klaxons by this "new-rave" thing i heard bandied about. But its not actually them that call themselves that, its a shit genre that NME have invented up to sell magazines and set a new trend, and they have just happened to use Klaxons to be the figurehead of this new genre because they are young and talented. I then listened to Klaxons without thinking of this NME bullshit and realised they are a truly gifted band and really did deserve to win this by quite a long way.
samnectar 4 years ago 2
I think that hair and cloths comment is very justified especially considering that cunt works for NME proably the worst culprit of makeing music not about the music, but nevermind.
xoxoxox
andymc32 4 years ago
ha! tell that bitch
cerpinTHEmute 4 years ago
Is this bloke for real. Klaxon's record was ok but Back to Black IS the defining album of the past year and Amy wiped the floor with everyone performance wise. W***er!
PaulIsbe 4 years ago
all haircut and clothes?!?!?!?
she needs a slap in the face with Myths...
klaxons completely deserved to win...huzzah boys, well done!
extraordinarygirl0 4 years ago 3
Oh God, what a middle-class cock!
Noonday100 4 years ago
klaxons deserved tht prize im over the moon they got it.
shrimple 4 years ago
Ha! I don't know what to laugh louder at - Klaxon's winning the Mercury which has to be the biggest joke of the year - or Alex Miller proving that all NME writers are total cunts
LPK101 4 years ago
that guy looks like seth myers
and klaxons completely deserved this.
abzechi 4 years ago
aww they look so adorableee n_n
they totally deserve it. =D
...and Jamie was too drunk. o.o
betterthinktwice 4 years ago 2
fuck this musta been a slow day at the newsrooms.
abbylolol 4 years ago 2
Brilliant. Glad the news lady pointed out that AM's hair is suspiciously similar to the Klaxon's alleged 'scenester hair' Hee hee.
icehaven3 4 years ago
klaxons are not a great band at all. The NME has also gone so so far downhill.
euro456 4 years ago
I couldn't agree more, the album was so hyped up and over-rated. It's so average!
sebbster2000 4 years ago
I think Bat for Lashes should have won. I see what Alex's point is about The Klaxons being more on the tip of where music has been for the last 12 months, but thats mainly because NME put them there by promoting this shambolic "new rave" genre. The Klaxons are ace, new-rave is just a term coined by NME to set a new trend which will soon be forgotton, although the Klaxons won't. Good on you guys.
samnectar 4 years ago
After listening extensively to both albums i retract the comment that bat for lashes should have won. Klaxons deserve this by a long long way. Bat for lashes main strength in the production, Klaxons have it all!
samnectar 4 years ago
Actually, I think it was Klaxons that called it new rave first. They then decided that it wasn't a very good idea and said that their album would just be pop, and have since banned glowsticks at their concerts, which is a minor tragedy. Oh well.
LifeDoesGoOn 4 years ago
I was sooo happy they won; how on earth did the view get nominated ahead of the good, the bad and the queen?
asabovesobellow 4 years ago
I'm glad they won. I like the fact they get their awards drunk and probably hight on MDMA. They might be arty pretentious wankers (good on them, who wants to be boring twats like Futureheads?) but at least they're not arrogant heinous pricks like Johnny Borel from Razorlight. And to all the people who thinks Bat For The Lashes should have won it, I tell them Wrong, The Horrors should have won it!
rodolphefleury 4 years ago
AGREED!
laurenHORROR 4 years ago
ah sory if your not but are you claire?
psipsina7 4 years ago
I hate the NME, but that was funny.
didzz 4 years ago
why do you hate NME?
ZOMBxE 4 years ago
Actully Jamie Has Said The Band Are 'Nu-Rave' In An Interview Before...But It's A Bit Of Indie/Pop/Rock/Dance :]
So There We Are...
Klaxons SO Deserved The Prize !!!
I
Love
Them
<3
BarkingMadWoOf 4 years ago
haha! despite being sh*t, they made me laugh by being pilled up
troboider 4 years ago
the term was coined by Joe Daniel, he is the head of angular records and plays guitar for the violets, but atm the klaxons since jamie broke his leg
blocandy 4 years ago
lol @ 2:15
bugpowderdust 4 years ago
"And im talking about toes thismorning"
wheeliebinn 4 years ago 3
sockironer your a mug, they dont even like being under the nu-rave genre. some idiot made it up and stuck it in a magazine and people followed. klaxons acctually say there not nu-rave and dont wanna be. they only dress illuminous cause they like to put on a good show and stand out as they say in there interviews.
joboy2k 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure that the term was coined by some feller at Kitsune - to describe them - they openly embraced the term until it was adopted by the mainstream. Fair enough if you like them, you like them, and if you don't, you don't - but c'mon - they don't come much more hypocritical than the NME, thats something that no one can deny...
XTRMJZZTRRR 4 years ago
the comments seem to point to the fact that the pretentious fuckwits embraced the term till it became popular (wot clever art rockers),as for being a mug,fair enough, Im a mug for not buying how great the fucking klaxons are, they still need a good kick in the head (before being carted off to a BUPA hospital on the back of mumsy wumsys medical insurance),and having to resort to illuminous clothes to stand out/put on a good show? err,dig your own hole mate,lol
sockironer 4 years ago
arent the klaxons a four piece band
stellaiss 4 years ago
"Rave" band (Nu-Rave being new wave music/old rave fashion - obviously forward thinking) win "prestigious" award, keyboard player chewing it up like Pac Man, NME sucks up to big time - you can even see a little fleck of shit on his nose (surprise). How left-field...
XTRMJZZTRRR 4 years ago
maybe they just deserved it?....
Balsch 4 years ago 3
Tut tut. They could have at least waited until after the awards before they took MDMA.
theGanj 4 years ago 4
haha best ever interview i have ever seen haha love the cheap dig you got in :D
markoos123 4 years ago 2
I cant watch, its like crawling thru shit to get to your mums funeral,even the NME editor is trying not to say how fucking abhorrent these pricks are,,how can you make a 'forward thinking album' whilst simultaneously trying to con old ravers into thinking your 'new rave',,Im sorry to spew such hate but these lads are pretensious wankers
sockironer 4 years ago
Go on Alex you lad!!!
JohnnyFlorida2000 4 years ago