let's face it, this guy's music might be incredibly expressive, but it sounds like shit... downfall of jazz. I'll say that it's pretty awesome, but in a completely different way.
very good interpretation. I love the variations of the original melody. I think Monk would have loved your version. The interplay of traditional with post modern reminds me of jelly roll mortons stride piano meets stockhausen's tone row.
It was actually Schoenberg who's known for the twelve-tone row. Haas' playing here sounds more classical to me (and tame, but I've listened to him a lot).
the haters got nothing on this. They sound great!
conguero76 3 years ago
im not sure of this version. but yer intresting i like listening to diffrent versions of things
arrowdan 3 years ago
That´s a way of playing "I Mean You" which is only "enjoyable" for really specialized people if you know what I mean.
Common "friends of Jazz" will find it hard to listen to it - no, actually not to listen but to LOOK at the piano player ^^.
No doubt he´s really great but... seriously...
I mean, you can´t watch this for a long time?
LL99LL 3 years ago
Try a little Keith Jarrett if you can't stand this!!
pjustusxi 3 years ago
You can't expect jazz today to sound like jazz from the 40s or even 60s...
I'm not a musician and I liked this version of Monk's classic.
BCKBCK 3 years ago
let's face it, this guy's music might be incredibly expressive, but it sounds like shit... downfall of jazz. I'll say that it's pretty awesome, but in a completely different way.
pianoanimal09 3 years ago
very good interpretation. I love the variations of the original melody. I think Monk would have loved your version. The interplay of traditional with post modern reminds me of jelly roll mortons stride piano meets stockhausen's tone row.
joetighe 4 years ago
It was actually Schoenberg who's known for the twelve-tone row. Haas' playing here sounds more classical to me (and tame, but I've listened to him a lot).
pjustusxi 3 years ago