Thank you so much. I am an A student but my teacher is extremely confusing. Im reading the book but I do need some explanation. You are very clear and made understand a lot.
My proffesor spent 2 weeks explaining this and i still didnt get it. I watched this once and feel like i can be tested over this, thanks for cutting out the bull shit that comes with classroom style teaching.
@freeze4real What you describe is called a "corner solution." It is possible in theory and in these contrived situations. In practice, it is rarely observed. To literally only choose one good and none of "other goods," a person would have to go without a lot of essentials. For example, suppose you maximize utility by having as much ice cream as possible. A corner solution here would mean that you would have *only* ice cream... no shoes, no water, no housing, no television, etc.
@freeze4real Yes, that's possible. At a corner solution, the indifference curve and a budget constraint are not necessarily tangent. To see why, consider a graph. Graphically, a corner solution on the Y-axis would involve an indifference curve that is flatter than the budget line.
@Jaiyo17 I agree that is an important question. That is why I address this question in Lecture 9a using calculus. But, the calculus doesn't make much sense without the conceptual foundation given in this video. Check it out if you are curious.
Without calculus, use the slopes equal condition (MRS = price ratio) and the budget constraint to provide yourself with two equation for the two unknowns: X and Y.
I have a question. Say the question says any two goods, (e.g. food and housing). Should we get the same result irrespective of whether we put food on the Y axis or housing? Is there a rule of thumb to follow which one goes onto which?
@samarthc For the conclusions you draw from the problem, it shouldn't matter which good you put on the horizontal/vertical axis. My usual default is to put the good whose price changes on the horizontal axis. If you do this, the graphs are usually easier to draw (and understand).
@samarthc In this case, take your pick for how to draw it. It shouldn't matter. My preference is to put the first price change on the horizontal axis, but that's a quirk in how I set things up.
@zaincool20 Yes. My book has the math, graphs, and written discussions (at this level, the math is just algebra, no calculus). I produced the videos as a supplement to the book, so they work better together.
Dynamite and whiskey; I love it! My public econ professor got his PhD from UC and spent ten years there doing papers, research, teaching etc. You have made things SO much more clean and simple. If you ever want to learn to snap somebody's arm off, just let me know. We can trade knowledge. Ha. Thanks!!
When I can relate new info to what I do myself or already understand, I get it! You have a way of doing this for my head every time. (You might like whiskey and tnt, I prefer coffee and cake). Applause Applause.
Thanks! The videos where I include calculus are denoted with an A (for "Advanced") next to the lecture number.
In my utility maximization with calculus video (Lecture 9A), I use a Cobb-like utility function (U=XY). Now technically, it isn't the usual Cobb-Douglas form, but it is the square of one. Perhaps, I'll do a video on monotone transformations that makes this point.
person spends all their money on whisky and dynamite =)
annie4170 2 days ago in playlist Intromediate Microeconomics
how is it that i spend 3 hours learning this in lectures and don't get it but understand it within 3 minutes of this video? thank you so much!
noneelse1 1 month ago
bravo..i love it.
makeiteasyable 2 months ago
stick of dynamite and shots HAHA
immortality64 2 months ago
I love you.
TYDiMaria 3 months ago
Thank you! Majorly helpful.
vshel1988 3 months ago
will you be doing these lectures in foreign languages?
wishythenwashy 3 months ago
awesome video! Great help!
Thanks a lot!
rrlu 4 months ago
Thank
270103023 4 months ago
Thank you so much. I am an A student but my teacher is extremely confusing. Im reading the book but I do need some explanation. You are very clear and made understand a lot.
johannaariz 5 months ago
Wow thanks so much for putting this on Youtube! You have no idea how helpful this is to me!
Agemrepus 6 months ago
you are a genious i say, and i wish were my prof
youngindian 7 months ago
thanx a lot
haseebahmed07518 10 months ago
My proffesor spent 2 weeks explaining this and i still didnt get it. I watched this once and feel like i can be tested over this, thanks for cutting out the bull shit that comes with classroom style teaching.
Theogrn 10 months ago
Great job, but get a camera stand or a more steady hand.
galindogirl84 11 months ago
@galindogirl84 Thanks. It won't help this video, but my more recent videos (after vid 20) use a tripod (and my R tutorials use screen capture).
intromediateecon 10 months ago 3
must a consumer choose two goods. if i were to maximise utility by picking only a good that i like is that possible.
freeze4real 1 year ago
@freeze4real What you describe is called a "corner solution." It is possible in theory and in these contrived situations. In practice, it is rarely observed. To literally only choose one good and none of "other goods," a person would have to go without a lot of essentials. For example, suppose you maximize utility by having as much ice cream as possible. A corner solution here would mean that you would have *only* ice cream... no shoes, no water, no housing, no television, etc.
intromediateecon 1 year ago 2
@intromediateecon
in this situation could a consumer maximize his utility buy buying only a product that's useful to him.
On a graph would a corner situation have a tangency condition?
thanks
freeze4real 1 year ago
@freeze4real Yes, that's possible. At a corner solution, the indifference curve and a budget constraint are not necessarily tangent. To see why, consider a graph. Graphically, a corner solution on the Y-axis would involve an indifference curve that is flatter than the budget line.
intromediateecon 1 year ago
Next time I plan on getting drunk and blowing shit up, this will come in handy.
Xasew 1 year ago
by the way..i like subtitles...it helps a lot...
debomiralha 1 year ago
this video saved my life...hihi
debomiralha 1 year ago
TNT and Whiskey kept me interested
Bergieberg28 1 year ago
A more important question is how do you derive the points (x,y) of the maximum utility??????????????
Jaiyo17 1 year ago
@Jaiyo17 I agree that is an important question. That is why I address this question in Lecture 9a using calculus. But, the calculus doesn't make much sense without the conceptual foundation given in this video. Check it out if you are curious.
Without calculus, use the slopes equal condition (MRS = price ratio) and the budget constraint to provide yourself with two equation for the two unknowns: X and Y.
intromediateecon 1 year ago
Thank you so much but I wish there were no subtitles
Afsoon2009 1 year ago
I have a question. Say the question says any two goods, (e.g. food and housing). Should we get the same result irrespective of whether we put food on the Y axis or housing? Is there a rule of thumb to follow which one goes onto which?
samarthc 1 year ago
@samarthc For the conclusions you draw from the problem, it shouldn't matter which good you put on the horizontal/vertical axis. My usual default is to put the good whose price changes on the horizontal axis. If you do this, the graphs are usually easier to draw (and understand).
intromediateecon 1 year ago
Thank you for your response. But, what if both prices are changing?
samarthc 1 year ago
@samarthc In this case, take your pick for how to draw it. It shouldn't matter. My preference is to put the first price change on the horizontal axis, but that's a quirk in how I set things up.
intromediateecon 1 year ago
Perfect
ny1fanta 1 year ago
Thank you SOOOO MUCH! I have a final tomorrow in Micro and I was crapping my pants until I saw your vid.
JoeDaPlumber 1 year ago
um is the math that you do for all these economic concepts included in the book that occurs on the side of ur video ??
zaincool20 1 year ago
@zaincool20 Yes. My book has the math, graphs, and written discussions (at this level, the math is just algebra, no calculus). I produced the videos as a supplement to the book, so they work better together.
intromediateecon 1 year ago
Dude! you are RAD! I wish my online prof was as solid as you!
lamesurfer101 1 year ago
Dynamite and whiskey; I love it! My public econ professor got his PhD from UC and spent ten years there doing papers, research, teaching etc. You have made things SO much more clean and simple. If you ever want to learn to snap somebody's arm off, just let me know. We can trade knowledge. Ha. Thanks!!
adamish1134 2 years ago
wow. thanks
sweetserenity12 2 years ago
great work, thank you!!!
liganizer9 2 years ago
Dyanmite and whiskey sounds like a Tom Waits song ;-D
damselnat 2 years ago
Dynamite and whiskey? Sounds like a great rock song.
mediblue9 2 years ago
When I can relate new info to what I do myself or already understand, I get it! You have a way of doing this for my head every time. (You might like whiskey and tnt, I prefer coffee and cake). Applause Applause.
uklizanon 2 years ago
Thanks for the compliment. I'll have to do an example with coffee and cake in the near future.
intromediateecon 2 years ago
Thankyou so much, I was totally lost before this :)
2scotland1 2 years ago
very well explained ... keep up the voluntary work...it was a very detailed and explanatory video
urrasberry 2 years ago
Great vid! Can you go over monotonic functions and maybe include more calculus applications (The Cobb function etc..)
mvho1 2 years ago
Thanks! The videos where I include calculus are denoted with an A (for "Advanced") next to the lecture number.
In my utility maximization with calculus video (Lecture 9A), I use a Cobb-like utility function (U=XY). Now technically, it isn't the usual Cobb-Douglas form, but it is the square of one. Perhaps, I'll do a video on monotone transformations that makes this point.
intromediateecon 2 years ago