I don't know about that, but do they have most advanced crash test center in the world? Oh wait... I answered my own question.... Check this: j1Wy4tO9azo
i love how volvo does their homework on vehicle safety. look closely at how the front end absorbs all the shock and the rest of the car shows little to no signs of bending. fabulous
my car s80 t6-99 looked exactly like this car in the front, and also looked like a tiny golf in the rear after a crash into the woods:P No problems afterwards, just to open the door and step out:P Very nice car to crash in!
i have `99 s80 and im happy about it.i have chance only normal parts like brake pads,discs,timingbelt etc.so who had a problem with 99 models its only ur bad luck.so buy a ford or opel and compair how happy u r after that and how much u spend money for repair it weekly!!
s80's fucing suck. this is probly the worst car volvo ever made. i have one, PIECE OF SHIT. the fucker has a mind of its own. leaks oil randomly, the climate control turns on wen the car is completely off and kills my battery. not to mention the tranny makes weird noises becuz its a GM transmission AND it needs THOUSANDS of dollars worth of front end work. DO NOT EVER BUY THESE CARSSSS. not to mention y seatbelt doesnt even work anymore
@alexc3589 no sorry s80 is the safest car in the world. and they dont normaly do what yours is. i dont know whats wrong with yours. but yeah look it up its the safesest on the road the 2000- 2006 volvo s80
@jmichael1holmes i never said it wasnt the SAFEST but the one i have "1999 s80 2.9 volvo" is a complete problem ridden piece of garbage. look it up, the 1999 s80 volvo is the WORST money pit volvo u can buy. thanks
@alexc3589 I have to disagree - the Volvo S80 is one of the finest, best-assembled upscale cars ever made. I should know because I'm a diehard Volvo enthusiast. They just need plenty of TLC. I'd take any '99 S80 (supposedly the worst year for the cars) over even the worst Toyota.
@alexc3589 Than you don't have volvo. I have Volvo s80 2003 2.4 125kW and NO PROBLEMS you mentioned. A friend of mine also drives s80 2001 2.4 120kW diesel and no problems. Take care of your car and don't ruin it , dumbass.
My girlfriend's FIRST car was a 2000 Volvo S80 that she paid $10,000 in 2008. WHAT A MONEY-PIT VOLVO'S ARE!!! The high-price means high-failure. These cars suck! The engine compartment is extremely cramped even in a non-turbo. To get a single part you need to take 4 other things out. They break down constantly and the parts are extremely expensive. My Girlfriend has replaced Transmission $3,500. Alternator $800. Axel shaft $700. ABS module $700. O2 Sensor $400. All within 16,000 miles.
@mrjustin5 You have to factor in how the previous owner took care of the car. Like was it up to date in oil changes, services, etc. I know my mom had a volvo that she bought and it lasted above 350k miles. Trust man, these cars are great cars as long as you keep in in well-maintained position!!
@bigswol34 Bigswol34 - Well maintained means: Replace those things that should not break more than once. Look at Kelly Blue Book website. The Volvo S80 gets 3.6 Stars out of 5. On the otherhand, a 1996 Toyota Camry gets 4.6 stars out of 5. Changing the oil regularly or not, does not effect transmission, alternator, ABS module. Read the KBB website and see all of the people complaining about how they dump thousands of dollars into these junkers to keep them running.
@mrjustin5 They might be complaining, but this is from experience. Not trying to be rude or anything, but I could care less about what a the book says. This is just from experience......That's better than any book in my opinion.
@mrjustin5 That's because you bought the worst year for Volvo ever. And paid too much.
GM trans? Yep.
ETM? Yep.
ABS module that is garbage? Yep
I hope that ETM has been replaced under warranty because with a delivery date in the 2000's, you're running up on the end of your extended warranty fast.
@KLowD9x The Volvo Stealership (Dealership) swears up and down that the computer history shows that her car had the ETM replaced and I was sure to have it checked out before the 10-year recall warranty. Yes, the GM transmission blew. ABS module went out and caused numerous errors codes that was completely unrelated to the ABS. Its a time bomb. I'm wondering what is going to go next. Cant sell it without a hassle because the bank owns the car.
Well all I can say is having crashed my s-80 last week quite badly I got out and walked away. I am also about to walk into a garage here in the uk and buy another one.
On those model year S80's, you could've gotten some burns from the gasses in the drivers airbag. That is why it wasn't a best pick that year. Also, the airbag sensors weren't adjusted correctly. During the 5 mph bumper test, the airbags had deployed. The same thing happened during the bumper test of the 2002 Kia Sedona.
I was scared of Volvos from 1998-January 14, 2004, thank God that fear is over :) I rode in a Volvo on Sept 8, 2009 for the first time in 11 years LOL.
Compared to new cars, yes their is less roof collapse. But you have to keep in mind that this is nearly 10 years ago when this car came/ VERY good for the time
Exactly. Also, Swedish Folksam, that conducts statistical observations through actual accidents rather than crash tests, has proven that this is indeed a very, very safe car.
why do all you shitheads (no offence thats just how i put things) look at crash tests you need to look at real world results and that means that in the real world a 9-5 is safer
1) Both cars scored identical marks in Folksam's investigations of real-life accidents
2) As I recall, SAAB's head airbags didn't cover the rear-seat passengers aorund 1998. Of course, side collisions happen much more rarely than offset frontal ones (hence the presumably modest weight in the Folksam investigations), but that still didn't help those who sat in the backseat back then. Volvo's side curtain airbags covered both seat rows.
3) As I recall, the 9-5 didn't come with ESP as standard equipment in 1998, whereas the Volvo S80 did. ESP has proven extremely important when it comes to avoiding accidents - something that's very, very hard for Folksam-like investigations to take into account, inasmuch as these investations consider the damages WHEN they have occured.
To sum it up, my point is that the Volvo, in its standard version incarnation, scored slightly less points in the EuroNCAP crash test, idendical marks in the Folksam test - and had better active safety to avoid accidents from even happening. That makes the Volvo the safer choice of the two cars. But please correct me if my assumptions are incorrect, and my arguments (in casu) of course fall flat. :-)
i 100% agree with you, for the same reason, i only drive volvo cars, which is the safest car for my family. the only car which since 1991 has unique sips system, later unique prignet dummy, unique whips system and since 2008 unique city safety system. it is a pitty that most people looking only for beautiful and cool cars but they do not think about safety.
Mate...Im a really big fat of a BMW, and I drive a BMW, and I LOVE it....i mean it is a safe car, but honestly, Volvo is really safe car...safer than the BMW....I mean, im nto saying its not a safe car.....it is safe, but volvo is just safer....
good but i expected better as this is a volvo..suprised that the main chassis bent a little and the driver door out of its original position...nice video btw
This has been flagged as spam show
@LPFan3118
I don't know about that, but do they have most advanced crash test center in the world? Oh wait... I answered my own question.... Check this: j1Wy4tO9azo
NoMercy1900 1 week ago
Both the S80 and the Saab 9-5 have similar results. Gotta love those Swedes, always looking out for us.
jacketman22 3 weeks ago
Volvo was the first car that actually had seatbelts, not bad.
TheJacobski 3 months ago
i love how volvo does their homework on vehicle safety. look closely at how the front end absorbs all the shock and the rest of the car shows little to no signs of bending. fabulous
thewhofan99 5 months ago
Volvo is one of the safest cars in the whole wide universe! :)
hoteliwinshowcases 7 months ago
until 2005 this was the safest car in the world. for 5 years. volvo definitely earns its safety reputation
Areoplane7 11 months ago
@Areoplane7 safest car in the world?How about the BMW E65 (from 2002) or Audi D3 (from 2002)?Are these cars under the S80?
LPFan3118 1 month ago
@LPFan3118 since when are 7 series and a8 in s80 class?
Areoplane7 1 month ago
Comment removed
NoMercy1900 1 week ago
Comment removed
NoMercy1900 1 week ago
my car s80 t6-99 looked exactly like this car in the front, and also looked like a tiny golf in the rear after a crash into the woods:P No problems afterwards, just to open the door and step out:P Very nice car to crash in!
plastmaskin1 1 year ago 2
i have `99 s80 and im happy about it.i have chance only normal parts like brake pads,discs,timingbelt etc.so who had a problem with 99 models its only ur bad luck.so buy a ford or opel and compair how happy u r after that and how much u spend money for repair it weekly!!
TheJuutupee 1 year ago
Ha
dats mah boy ;)
Latvietis96 1 year ago
s80's fucing suck. this is probly the worst car volvo ever made. i have one, PIECE OF SHIT. the fucker has a mind of its own. leaks oil randomly, the climate control turns on wen the car is completely off and kills my battery. not to mention the tranny makes weird noises becuz its a GM transmission AND it needs THOUSANDS of dollars worth of front end work. DO NOT EVER BUY THESE CARSSSS. not to mention y seatbelt doesnt even work anymore
alexc3589 1 year ago
@alexc3589 no sorry s80 is the safest car in the world. and they dont normaly do what yours is. i dont know whats wrong with yours. but yeah look it up its the safesest on the road the 2000- 2006 volvo s80
jmichael1holmes 1 year ago
@jmichael1holmes i never said it wasnt the SAFEST but the one i have "1999 s80 2.9 volvo" is a complete problem ridden piece of garbage. look it up, the 1999 s80 volvo is the WORST money pit volvo u can buy. thanks
alexc3589 1 year ago
@alexc3589 I have to disagree - the Volvo S80 is one of the finest, best-assembled upscale cars ever made. I should know because I'm a diehard Volvo enthusiast. They just need plenty of TLC. I'd take any '99 S80 (supposedly the worst year for the cars) over even the worst Toyota.
jsrosa1282 1 year ago
@jsrosa1282 Because you're mentally ill.
OranjeEINS 1 year ago
@OranjeEINS Actually, I'm saying it's real. I love the S80s - they rock!!
jsrosa1282 1 year ago
@alexc3589 Than you don't have volvo. I have Volvo s80 2003 2.4 125kW and NO PROBLEMS you mentioned. A friend of mine also drives s80 2001 2.4 120kW diesel and no problems. Take care of your car and don't ruin it , dumbass.
Helldarkie 1 year ago
@alexc3589 The climate fan turns on when the car is off to dry the evaporator. It is normal. And get a new battery.
volvosweden 2 months ago
i drive this lol didnt know people appreciated these that much i feel more proud driving one
Capwonder 1 year ago
Volvo is, in fact, for life....
pacificanairways 1 year ago
Im from SWEDEN the swedish pride ! :D my mum is going to buy 1 volvo s80 to my birthday i cant fucking WAIT !!!
jimiboy97 1 year ago
My girlfriend's FIRST car was a 2000 Volvo S80 that she paid $10,000 in 2008. WHAT A MONEY-PIT VOLVO'S ARE!!! The high-price means high-failure. These cars suck! The engine compartment is extremely cramped even in a non-turbo. To get a single part you need to take 4 other things out. They break down constantly and the parts are extremely expensive. My Girlfriend has replaced Transmission $3,500. Alternator $800. Axel shaft $700. ABS module $700. O2 Sensor $400. All within 16,000 miles.
mrjustin5 1 year ago
@mrjustin5 You have to factor in how the previous owner took care of the car. Like was it up to date in oil changes, services, etc. I know my mom had a volvo that she bought and it lasted above 350k miles. Trust man, these cars are great cars as long as you keep in in well-maintained position!!
bigswol34 1 year ago
@bigswol34 Bigswol34 - Well maintained means: Replace those things that should not break more than once. Look at Kelly Blue Book website. The Volvo S80 gets 3.6 Stars out of 5. On the otherhand, a 1996 Toyota Camry gets 4.6 stars out of 5. Changing the oil regularly or not, does not effect transmission, alternator, ABS module. Read the KBB website and see all of the people complaining about how they dump thousands of dollars into these junkers to keep them running.
mrjustin5 1 year ago
@mrjustin5 They might be complaining, but this is from experience. Not trying to be rude or anything, but I could care less about what a the book says. This is just from experience......That's better than any book in my opinion.
bigswol34 1 year ago
@mrjustin5 That's because you bought the worst year for Volvo ever. And paid too much.
GM trans? Yep.
ETM? Yep.
ABS module that is garbage? Yep
I hope that ETM has been replaced under warranty because with a delivery date in the 2000's, you're running up on the end of your extended warranty fast.
KLowD9x 1 year ago
@KLowD9x The Volvo Stealership (Dealership) swears up and down that the computer history shows that her car had the ETM replaced and I was sure to have it checked out before the 10-year recall warranty. Yes, the GM transmission blew. ABS module went out and caused numerous errors codes that was completely unrelated to the ABS. Its a time bomb. I'm wondering what is going to go next. Cant sell it without a hassle because the bank owns the car.
mrjustin5 1 year ago
my grand dad: Volvo
my dad: Volvo
me hehe: Volvo
and my kids(lol) : Volvo
Volvo For Life
VolvoEP 1 year ago 2
its a frontal impact hence no side airbags you douchebag...
tk66066 1 year ago 2
front tire still rolls after impact... TANK!!!
chicoloco341 1 year ago
Doesn't really look that safe really, I've seen Ford's safer than that! And no side airbags for a Volvo? That's bad.
talldude123 1 year ago
@talldude123 yea, but still Volvo makes worlds safest cars so fuck Ford :D
BlueMoonTM 1 year ago
Well all I can say is having crashed my s-80 last week quite badly I got out and walked away. I am also about to walk into a garage here in the uk and buy another one.
stigsfatcousin 1 year ago
On those model year S80's, you could've gotten some burns from the gasses in the drivers airbag. That is why it wasn't a best pick that year. Also, the airbag sensors weren't adjusted correctly. During the 5 mph bumper test, the airbags had deployed. The same thing happened during the bumper test of the 2002 Kia Sedona.
raejaybigpapi 2 years ago
it doesnt look very safety to me
bmw51952 2 years ago
ye? what about this?
/watch?v=BOFIt9iw1Fs&NR=1
orbdnb 2 years ago
yes that car was safety ahhah
bmw51952 2 years ago
so u stay allive if u are this kind of accident what is the speed?
JazZzi88 2 years ago
I was scared of Volvos from 1998-January 14, 2004, thank God that fear is over :) I rode in a Volvo on Sept 8, 2009 for the first time in 11 years LOL.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
A-pillar looked a little weak.
4MATICbenz 2 years ago 2
Yes, there was some rupture. But the design goes back to 1998...
felsner1 2 years ago
tak je to volvo
zavinaczprahy 2 years ago
stiffness can be a bad attribute. Stiffness transfers forces, while bending and plastic action dampen.
JDankens 2 years ago
Compared to new cars, yes their is less roof collapse. But you have to keep in mind that this is nearly 10 years ago when this car came/ VERY good for the time
shellshock940T 2 years ago 3
I totally agree. But this is a 2000 volvo S80. For the time it was verry safe.
Zwaverd 2 years ago 4
Exactly. Also, Swedish Folksam, that conducts statistical observations through actual accidents rather than crash tests, has proven that this is indeed a very, very safe car.
felsner1 2 years ago
yet the saab 9-5 is safer and is on a much older platform
FantomLightning 2 years ago
Yeah, the 9-5 acutally was very impressive when tested back in the late '90'ies. I'm sure it did well in the Folksam tests, too.
felsner1 2 years ago
hell it still is
FantomLightning 2 years ago
I have to disagree on that one. Four stars don't impress me these days, when five stars is practically the standard.
felsner1 2 years ago
why do all you shitheads (no offence thats just how i put things) look at crash tests you need to look at real world results and that means that in the real world a 9-5 is safer
FantomLightning 2 years ago
This is an interesting discussion - and one that I was hoping could be conducted without the use of abusive language and the like.
Anyway - you're right about the real-word results, to a certain degree. But I have a number of counter-arguments on that account:
felsner1 2 years ago
1) Both cars scored identical marks in Folksam's investigations of real-life accidents
2) As I recall, SAAB's head airbags didn't cover the rear-seat passengers aorund 1998. Of course, side collisions happen much more rarely than offset frontal ones (hence the presumably modest weight in the Folksam investigations), but that still didn't help those who sat in the backseat back then. Volvo's side curtain airbags covered both seat rows.
felsner1 2 years ago
3) As I recall, the 9-5 didn't come with ESP as standard equipment in 1998, whereas the Volvo S80 did. ESP has proven extremely important when it comes to avoiding accidents - something that's very, very hard for Folksam-like investigations to take into account, inasmuch as these investations consider the damages WHEN they have occured.
felsner1 2 years ago
To sum it up, my point is that the Volvo, in its standard version incarnation, scored slightly less points in the EuroNCAP crash test, idendical marks in the Folksam test - and had better active safety to avoid accidents from even happening. That makes the Volvo the safer choice of the two cars. But please correct me if my assumptions are incorrect, and my arguments (in casu) of course fall flat. :-)
felsner1 2 years ago
If he had a seatbelt and no airbag he probably would survive..
Ericosproduction 2 years ago 31
Hoorah for Volvo's!!!
glengibson1973 2 years ago 2
volvo is the safest car in the world and that why i only buy that car
toyotasennia911 2 years ago 39
Comment removed
dj3alwan 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i 100% agree with you, for the same reason, i only drive volvo cars, which is the safest car for my family. the only car which since 1991 has unique sips system, later unique prignet dummy, unique whips system and since 2008 unique city safety system. it is a pitty that most people looking only for beautiful and cool cars but they do not think about safety.
dj3alwan 2 years ago
@toyotasennia911
then why the fuck are you calling yourself toyota-sennia?
obaidCarkey 11 months ago 3
@toyotasennia911, used to be, like 15 years ago lol
shred5 6 months ago
and the score?
sprito4 3 years ago
pause at 0:11 and look at where the top of the windshield ends! LOL!
ericstranne 3 years ago
Volvo has been safe since the start making it...
sweetmossi 3 years ago
check the new volvo xc60 worlds safest SUV!
i really like it ;D
hgfrjkgfjjj 3 years ago
the BMW ITS NOT BETHER in safty test
raxmo 3 years ago
Thats how looks my T6 now :( All i can say is that my next car will be VOLVO again.
Atus123456 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the BMW are beter than the volvo
SDRYC 3 years ago
is this a joke hahah?
tell me categories that bmw are better then volvo please.
then i going to tell you what volvo has.
i can just tell you that volvo kill the bmw easy
hgfrjkgfjjj 3 years ago
Mate...Im a really big fat of a BMW, and I drive a BMW, and I LOVE it....i mean it is a safe car, but honestly, Volvo is really safe car...safer than the BMW....I mean, im nto saying its not a safe car.....it is safe, but volvo is just safer....
sweetmossi 3 years ago
WOW you maze me with the word safe
itrod123 3 years ago 3
This model is 2001 I think. Looks very good for that year.
EmpirePersian 3 years ago
It's a 2000...there's a small white-on-black sticker on the driver's side door that says "2000 Volvo S80" and I'm a proud owner of this car 8-)
GeetarGuy211 3 years ago
good but i expected better as this is a volvo..suprised that the main chassis bent a little and the driver door out of its original position...nice video btw
gaj3n 3 years ago 3
couldnt agree more :/
bigvanilla27 3 years ago
couldn't agree more as well...
sweetmossi 3 years ago
pretty good
nAyGiNi 3 years ago
2005 - 2006 model alınabilir çok şuh bi yapısı var.
yvzkrgz34 3 years ago
wonderful!!!!
CarboY1994 3 years ago
Very good!
canonpowershotseries 3 years ago 3