mattyabsley, you're comfortable playing semantics. Stay focused and acknowledge the existence of some "thing" responsible for the initial force/energy of the Big Bang. You won't state to yourself the necessity for the existence of this "thing." You don't search for the truth. Always a pedantic response to a true statement for some "thing" responsible for the existence of the universe.
Definitions of this "thing" will follow, sans any input this your obstinate frame of mind.
mergatroidal - Ignore the fact that all of your claims are nonsense and go for some random nonsense about whether or not i drink too much coffee/beer? Yeah, that furthers your moronic argument. You made some pretty big claims and when they are shown to be complete bullshit you resort to that? How very grown up of you. Also if you are attempting to be funny then at least fucking know what you are saying, it's aye, not eye! Dipshit.
A premise that things either exist or they do not. The question: the force/energy (f/e) of the universe at the moment of the Big Bang came from where? The f/e either came from something that exists or something that does not exist. Absurd to conclude the f/e originated from nonexistence, and so by consequence some "thing" is the origin of the f/e of the universe.
Defining this "thing" is another subject. Acknowledging It's existence is profound if no refutation can be found to the contrary.
"Absurd to conclude the f/e originated from nonexistence, and so by consequence some "thing" is the origin of the f/e of the universe." - And what is your point? Why does this have anything to do with atheism? Unless you want to claim that this "thing" is God, then i would say i don't believe you. "Absurd to conclude the f/e originated from nonexistence" - Why do i have to have an opinion, again, what does this have to do with atheism?
mergatroidal - You are either trying to say atheism leads to your way of thinking or that all atheists believe that something came from nothing when to be frank with you, only creationists say something came from nothing. It has nothing really to do with atheism at all, but for the purpose of your argument it needs to be related, otherwise you really have nothing to argue about, and so this is why you do it, you make a strawman to argue with.
mergatroidal - We already know that some particles dissapear and reappear from nowhere. Or exists in more than one place at the same time. So i put to you that your question is firstly dishonest to begin with, it's whole purpose is to demand one specific answer. We have no real reason to say that existence needs explaining at all. Only religious people demand finite answers to questions that may not even be able to be answered. Only the fool asks a wise man for answers that can't be given.
mergatroidal - So we are still looking for evidence to back up your claims, all you have is a little idol philosophy and a demand to choose between two answers which you provide. For example, you still haven't proved that the universe you say had to come from somewhere even exists. Past i think therefore I am, everything you are arguing about is based on presumptions. In other words, no matter how stupid this sounds, it is another option/answer to your question which you don't offer as a choice.
The reason why this contention between atheists and deists exists for so long is because the Western school systems don't teach critical thought processes. If they did this type of back and forth nonsense wouldn't be worth one's time to bother engaging in.
Theology and Deism would go neo-, and there would be those critical minds who would give logical explanation for the origin of the force/energy (f/e) of the Big Bang. The f/e transformed into the quarks, the quarks meld to atoms to molecules w/ some molecules eventually to become animate forms of life. Fraction of a second after the BB, two things exist: the f/e and expanding 3D volume of space. Two things in existence and the 3D v. of space doesn't turn into quarks, the f/e does. Magic, right?
mergatroidal - wow, another mighty claim, this is as bad as creationist claims without merit. What about the correlation between "any" education and religion. What about the cultural environment that says "having faith" is an honourable pastime? That "belief" is a much more noble pursuit than learning. Sorry, but your kind of comment is as bad as what you are complaining about.
As mattyabsley goes through his walk in life, he's prone to engage in discourse spouting doctrines claiming some type of things can originate from nonexistent things. "Positively," says mattyabsley to his atheist commrades, "the f/e of the Big Bang originated from some "thing" already in existence."
mattyabsley and DimBulbRaven0 are intelligent. And then the alarm clock went off, and I woke up.
With what modern science has brought to the table, Descartes and Newton would laugh at your atheism.
"With what modern science has brought to the table, Descartes and Newton would laugh at your atheism." - Probably, but then you would have to ask yourself whether or not i care and secondly whether or not what they had to say would mean anything. Which it wouldn't. Neither discovered anything that would call into question their faith. Now shhh. And for all they contributed they had enough mistakes, errors and plain downright stupidities to fill up the religious stupidity vacuum.
mergatroidal - Perhaps you would like to start again. You made a load of claims, now clarify them rather than create your own version of me in your head. And for your information, what modern science has brought to the table is pretty much EVERYTHING you can see in front of you. AND YOUR LIFE. Most of us would not even have food if it wasn't for modern science techniques so wisen up a little crackhead. I say crackhead because you really must be smoking something,
mergatroidal - And finally, the main claim that i had problems with was you stated that western schools don't teach critical thinking, without anything to back up your statement. I went to a western school and it's quite clear that i am offering more than enough critical thinking to question your dumb ass, therefore, your original claim is false. Someone had to teach me. Could that be a western school you condescending fucking prick?
hogtiechamp - He is not venomfangx 2.0, i did some calculations, adding the combined values of the various guises of venomfangx's and i came up with a value of venomfangx 0.82 . This was the combined total of both of them. As you can quite clearly see the combined value still doesn't make a complete value. We are still searching for the "missing link" between intelligence and both of these values, but to date NOTHING has ever been found.
BrightRaven0, just sub'd! (I can't believe I sub'd based on a vid with the fuckin' Rick Astley song playing!!! But you DO make the point amply well.)
The vid with GEERUP/VFX2.0 is painful. The guy argues with the TV while on pause... and he's losing!
I mentioned this is my vid "Expelled Dispelled" (watch?v=ILu-GAaq74Q). It's a response to similar crap from TheAtheistAntidote. Check it out please... Sub if your fancy is tickled!
The worst part is, i wasn't really going for pwnage, he just pwns himself basicly.
OK so i did Pwn him on purpose, but he yelled at me on a comments section after i said that i was going to be serious and not "pwn" him all the time. so he wanted this.
also fuck islam (it is illegal to say that in the netherlands)
mattyabsley, you're comfortable playing semantics. Stay focused and acknowledge the existence of some "thing" responsible for the initial force/energy of the Big Bang. You won't state to yourself the necessity for the existence of this "thing." You don't search for the truth. Always a pedantic response to a true statement for some "thing" responsible for the existence of the universe.
Definitions of this "thing" will follow, sans any input this your obstinate frame of mind.
mergatroidal 2 years ago
mergatroidal - Ignore the fact that all of your claims are nonsense and go for some random nonsense about whether or not i drink too much coffee/beer? Yeah, that furthers your moronic argument. You made some pretty big claims and when they are shown to be complete bullshit you resort to that? How very grown up of you. Also if you are attempting to be funny then at least fucking know what you are saying, it's aye, not eye! Dipshit.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
THE UNIVERSE IF FLAT!!! MEANING THE EARTH IS FLAT ASWELL!!!
PWNED
gg
DarkDragon187II 2 years ago
A premise that things either exist or they do not. The question: the force/energy (f/e) of the universe at the moment of the Big Bang came from where? The f/e either came from something that exists or something that does not exist. Absurd to conclude the f/e originated from nonexistence, and so by consequence some "thing" is the origin of the f/e of the universe.
Defining this "thing" is another subject. Acknowledging It's existence is profound if no refutation can be found to the contrary.
mergatroidal 2 years ago
"Absurd to conclude the f/e originated from nonexistence, and so by consequence some "thing" is the origin of the f/e of the universe." - And what is your point? Why does this have anything to do with atheism? Unless you want to claim that this "thing" is God, then i would say i don't believe you. "Absurd to conclude the f/e originated from nonexistence" - Why do i have to have an opinion, again, what does this have to do with atheism?
mattyabsley 2 years ago
mergatroidal - You are either trying to say atheism leads to your way of thinking or that all atheists believe that something came from nothing when to be frank with you, only creationists say something came from nothing. It has nothing really to do with atheism at all, but for the purpose of your argument it needs to be related, otherwise you really have nothing to argue about, and so this is why you do it, you make a strawman to argue with.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
mergatroidal - We already know that some particles dissapear and reappear from nowhere. Or exists in more than one place at the same time. So i put to you that your question is firstly dishonest to begin with, it's whole purpose is to demand one specific answer. We have no real reason to say that existence needs explaining at all. Only religious people demand finite answers to questions that may not even be able to be answered. Only the fool asks a wise man for answers that can't be given.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
mergatroidal - So we are still looking for evidence to back up your claims, all you have is a little idol philosophy and a demand to choose between two answers which you provide. For example, you still haven't proved that the universe you say had to come from somewhere even exists. Past i think therefore I am, everything you are arguing about is based on presumptions. In other words, no matter how stupid this sounds, it is another option/answer to your question which you don't offer as a choice.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
The reason why this contention between atheists and deists exists for so long is because the Western school systems don't teach critical thought processes. If they did this type of back and forth nonsense wouldn't be worth one's time to bother engaging in.
mergatroidal 2 years ago
Yes, if they thought critical thinking, Theology would be compleately gone and Deisum would be almolst non existant...
wait that post of your made sense...
On some type of new medication? if so, keep it up.
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
Theology and Deism would go neo-, and there would be those critical minds who would give logical explanation for the origin of the force/energy (f/e) of the Big Bang. The f/e transformed into the quarks, the quarks meld to atoms to molecules w/ some molecules eventually to become animate forms of life. Fraction of a second after the BB, two things exist: the f/e and expanding 3D volume of space. Two things in existence and the 3D v. of space doesn't turn into quarks, the f/e does. Magic, right?
mergatroidal 2 years ago
mergatroidal - wow, another mighty claim, this is as bad as creationist claims without merit. What about the correlation between "any" education and religion. What about the cultural environment that says "having faith" is an honourable pastime? That "belief" is a much more noble pursuit than learning. Sorry, but your kind of comment is as bad as what you are complaining about.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
As mattyabsley goes through his walk in life, he's prone to engage in discourse spouting doctrines claiming some type of things can originate from nonexistent things. "Positively," says mattyabsley to his atheist commrades, "the f/e of the Big Bang originated from some "thing" already in existence."
mattyabsley and DimBulbRaven0 are intelligent. And then the alarm clock went off, and I woke up.
With what modern science has brought to the table, Descartes and Newton would laugh at your atheism.
mergatroidal 2 years ago
"With what modern science has brought to the table, Descartes and Newton would laugh at your atheism." - Probably, but then you would have to ask yourself whether or not i care and secondly whether or not what they had to say would mean anything. Which it wouldn't. Neither discovered anything that would call into question their faith. Now shhh. And for all they contributed they had enough mistakes, errors and plain downright stupidities to fill up the religious stupidity vacuum.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
mergatroidal - Perhaps you would like to start again. You made a load of claims, now clarify them rather than create your own version of me in your head. And for your information, what modern science has brought to the table is pretty much EVERYTHING you can see in front of you. AND YOUR LIFE. Most of us would not even have food if it wasn't for modern science techniques so wisen up a little crackhead. I say crackhead because you really must be smoking something,
mattyabsley 2 years ago
mergatroidal - And finally, the main claim that i had problems with was you stated that western schools don't teach critical thinking, without anything to back up your statement. I went to a western school and it's quite clear that i am offering more than enough critical thinking to question your dumb ass, therefore, your original claim is false. Someone had to teach me. Could that be a western school you condescending fucking prick?
mattyabsley 2 years ago
Wow, mattyabsley drinks way too much coffee, or beer. The poor guy cannot stay focused ..., so it goes.
"Beam me up, Scotty."
"... 'eye, Captain."
mergatroidal 2 years ago
... WUT ZAH FUNK?
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
2:08 Geerup almost gets a clue - "This is Primate stuff". Exactly - a Lemur with Primate characteristics.
frogfizz 2 years ago
Which makes it our earliest ancestor! it is the "first" primate.
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
VFX2.0: "This is a money-making venture here!"
Science is a money-making venture?? Geez, then I'm doing it wrong!
hogtiechamp 2 years ago
hogtiechamp - He is not venomfangx 2.0, i did some calculations, adding the combined values of the various guises of venomfangx's and i came up with a value of venomfangx 0.82 . This was the combined total of both of them. As you can quite clearly see the combined value still doesn't make a complete value. We are still searching for the "missing link" between intelligence and both of these values, but to date NOTHING has ever been found.
mattyabsley 2 years ago
BrightRaven0, just sub'd! (I can't believe I sub'd based on a vid with the fuckin' Rick Astley song playing!!! But you DO make the point amply well.)
The vid with GEERUP/VFX2.0 is painful. The guy argues with the TV while on pause... and he's losing!
I mentioned this is my vid "Expelled Dispelled" (watch?v=ILu-GAaq74Q). It's a response to similar crap from TheAtheistAntidote. Check it out please... Sub if your fancy is tickled!
hogtiechamp 2 years ago
I swear to God!! When Geerup uses the word "Designer" I want to slug him in the fuckin mouth soooo bad. If I started though, I couldnt stop.
harpo10 2 years ago
great vid. made me laugh... though given the focus(gearbox being an idiot), that wasn't a very difficult feat.
oh and FUCK ISLAM!! Alah sucks my dick for breakfast.
peace man; just sub'd
PhilipWitte 2 years ago
Good work, especially when he sayed "regardless" all the facts.
fight4th3truth 2 years ago
Yeah, that is my favorate part, I am in the process of dedicating an entire video to it., I just cant stop watching it again and again and again...
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
This is some epic stuff. I'm really surprised you don't have more of a fanbase. More of a hidden gem, so to speak.
Tomeg12 2 years ago
sir, i just wana say this, your sense of realism is refreshing.
cheers.
Caonabo 2 years ago
so i'm a big fan
but common dude proofread a lil
lolhowdoishotweblol 2 years ago
What an idiot Geerup really is...
Great pwnage
Eopyk 2 years ago
The worst part is, i wasn't really going for pwnage, he just pwns himself basicly.
OK so i did Pwn him on purpose, but he yelled at me on a comments section after i said that i was going to be serious and not "pwn" him all the time. so he wanted this.
also fuck islam (it is illegal to say that in the netherlands)
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
fuck places willing to succumb to sharia law!
lolhowdoishotweblol 2 years ago
Yes true he did pwn himself.. and pwn himself extremly well but you gave it all an extra touch.
All love from me Jasmine.
Eopyk 2 years ago