EU History

[gato123452]

i got one Question whats the difference between the EU and the UN?

[saulpaulus]

@gato123452 The UN is a deliberative body composed of member nations from around the world who--hopefully--work together to resolve problems & promote the common good. The EU is a union of European nations that have ceded sovereignty to varying degrees to form an economic and recently political, military, and diplomatic union.

[PierreRMB]

@gato123452 EU is for every countries of Europe that are in a Democracy. The UN is for every Nations across the world who agree to insure human rights and are willing to help other Nations to insure peace across the world. They also are willing to give some of their soldiers to NATO to help inforce human rights accross the glob. Some countries in the UN may only be interested in oil and other resorces. But in the EU, only a fue countries lie, and it never ends well once they do.

[motormonkeyNL]

@mantuskas Yugoslavia wasnt part of the EU

[mantuskas1]

@motormonkeyNL Yes, but it was and is a part of Europe

[19834883]

Die EU ist nichts anderes als die neue UDSSR, wir haben NICHTS von unserer Geschichte gelernt. Ist euch nicht aufgefallen, das mit aller gewallt alles vermischt werden will. So bal man NATIONALSTOLZ sagt wird das als Rechtsextrem eingestuft, sobald man eigene Kultur sagt wird gleich, Ausländerfeindlich eingestuft, Wir können wählen wen wir wollen, Parteien die wir so haben stecken gemeinsam hinter dem, und wenn man sagt wird man Gleich als Verschwörungsteoretiger eingestuft"! ES KOTZT MICH AN!"

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 I am concerned about right wing extremism....in Europe & in the US. I am also concerned that Europe could breed militant Islamic terror cells. Having said that, there is no comparison between the EC & the USSR. The USSR crushed freedom of expression throughout the Warsaw Pact & entirely subjugated peoples throughout central & eastern Europe as Russia still does in Chechnya. The EC has been a force for peace & prosperity that has kept peaceful a region wracked by the 2 worst wars ever.

[motormonkeyNL]

since the EU we didnt had a war in europe

[mantuskas1]

@motormonkeyNL What about Yugoslav wars(1991-1995)?

[Vytautas998]

EU is wonderful

[delevero2]

EU is nothing more than Hitlers dream of a superpower... EU is not a democratic thing, just see how they litterly forced the lisabon treaty to be signed becourse they knew it was impossible to have the populations accept it... It must be mankinds biggest theft. . Every country should only have 1 vote that way everyone is Equal that is democracy.

Today the small countries are nothing more than puppet states in a big state/superpower

[saulpaulus]

@delevero2 There may well be inequities in the EU. I would not say that it is perfect. But to compare it to theThird Reich is the height of absurdity.

[19834883]

@saulpaulus no its the SAME;!"

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 That's absurd. The Third Reich was responsible for the deaths of some 50 million people---even if I do not count those killed in the Pacific because the Japanese were emboldened by Hitler's success against the European powers.

[19834883]

@saulpaulus EU = UDSSR

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 You can keep saying it, but it just isn't so.

[19834883]

@saulpaulus It is a Fakt, Italy is italy, and irland is irland, different people different Cultur, no body wants the Eu, no body Needs the Eu, we have note vote for this Anti emocratic UDSSR, becorse we CANT the have never ask us, becorse they are ANTI Demokratic, iam From germany, and the Last Years iam ANTI EU, we need do go baclk to us history, us Kuture, thats wat every Country must do FAST, You fro USAß you have no Plan wat is Cultur, you dont have won just BIG MAC

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 How many people does the EC send to gulags? To "psychiatric care"? How many does it murder? Go back to pre EC Europe? That Europe created the two worst wars in history. Your view of the US is quite superficial. You need to learn more and judge less.

[19834883]

@saulpaulus You an American, so you CANT understand Europe, becorse you an Country without Cultur, you an Country without nation, you just a Mix, and a Mix is Bullshit, like the USA, a Country without history and Cultur have no Future, we already go Back in Europa Fuck the EU Freedom for all Nations in Europe with his glory Culturs. Forget USA, USA is History totaly bankrupt, the Bancruptes Country in the Wold History"!

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 I understand Europe FAR better than you understand America. You clearly have NO Clue whatever about America. I understand Europe and its history and culture quite well and am well read on current events as well as communicate regularly with well informed Europeans. E Pluribus Unum...out of many one...our diversity is our strength...Europe, on the other hand, cannot handle its minorities...especially Muslims.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Having dealt with nazism and communism, I think we can handle islam as well. We just need to make some filtering in a proper way. In a democracy it takes time, you see, to respond to totalitarianism abusing open society.

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston We do have some problems in the US with the racist attitudes of the Tea Party people. It does seem however that relations between caucasian Europeans and Muslims on the Continent are rather more troubled...perhaps because Europe's native population is shrinking and the immigrant population is growing.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Immigration into Europe is not a problem per se, but welcomed. Following media in French, German, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian and English, I can assure you that noone is really concerned about South East Asian or South American immigrants. The problem with the ideology of Islam (not a race) is that it - like nazism, which it very much ressembles - is incompatible with humanist secular civilisation. This for a great number or reasons, first drawn to my attention by Iranian friends.

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston There seems to be a lot of popular blowback against Muslim immigration in the news over there. Here we have more of an issue on the border with Mexico to do with the out of control drug cartels as well as impoverished Mexicans looking for work.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus It's neither popular nor directed towards Muslims, but Islam as an ideology. It's the same distinction as between the German people as a collective during the second world war and nazism. Europeans today are increasingly refusing a "peace-in-our-time" apologetic kind of attitude against this system of "submission", developed by a warior during his life-time for his political purposes of conquest - of land and individuals. A good thing is to study Islam before entering that debate.

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston Not popular, not toward Muslims?

"One poll found that more than a third of Germans agreed with Mr. Sarrazin’s prognosis that Germany was becoming “naturally more stupid on average” as a result of immigration from Muslim countries. "

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Didn't Mr. Sarrazin point out that it isn’t about race, but about coming from Islamic cultures? Once again try understand the difference before jumping into the barrel of popular political correctness. The reality here in the EU is that people submitting themselves to Islam (meaning submission) isolate and oppose and work against the fundamental humanist values of our societies. No other immigration group does that. "Peace in our time" is popular, not opposing totalitarianism.

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston No actually his emphasis was on the inherent stupidity of the Muslim race and how it is affecting Germany. He did also comment on the refusal of Muslims to integrate. He also made some charming comments about Jews.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus The Muslim refusal to integrate is not contested over here, but could you be more precise on the Jews. He has been explaining over and over again on German TV with references to the works of others (not himself) what he said. Then a lot of people have said what they thought he had said. On 9 June 2010, the New York Times published an article about studies showing Jews’ genetic similarity. He made a reference to the article and hell broke out. What quote in German by him do you mean?

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston Many first & even second generation immigrants are slow to integrate. That is true even in the US. Sarrazin has stated that Muslims are genetically inferior & a large percentage of Germans support him.

Attitudes across Europe are similar toward Muslims as well as Roma & Eastern Europeans--especially Albanians. I suppose that it could be argued that there is a class as well as racial & ethnic elements in these attitudes, but it is clear that the attitudes exist & are widespread.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Mixing Eastern Europeans into this discussion shows that you don't know what you're talking about. They share our fundamental humanist values. Second, Western Europe embraced them along with the Central Europeans by expanding the Union with 12 new Member States in 2004 and 2007-unlike Turkey. If there is any area in Europe where Islam is perceived very negatively it's in Eastern Europe. GO THERE! They are skilled and work very hard for low salaries, which might upset some UK Unions.

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston Yada yada yada. I do know whereof I speak. They are not well embraced in Italy. There is much popular indignation directed toward them. This I know for a fact. I cannot imagine that the rest of western Europe is that much different.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Finally, the Roma situation (once again don't mix that up with Easter Europeans, who have some problems with Roma integration in their own countries), is purely a matter of illegal immigration in Westerns Europe. There are certain EU rules you have to follow in order to benefit from the freedom of movement - which the Roma didn't in France. The Commission closed it's case against France on these grounds. Are you suggesting that anyone should be able to set up a camp in France?

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston It is hard NOT to mix them up with eastern Europe since that is where they are from...but OK. I am not referring to the legal issues regarding the Roma. I am referring to popular attitudes toward them...which are decidedly negative.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus PLEASE, study the Roma history. Firstly, they are NOT from Eastern Europe: They started to walk from India around 1000 AD; their presence in Europe is documented first around 1300! Second, most of them DON'T live in Eastern Europe today: Most of them live in Western Europe. The second biggest group is to be found in Central Europe. Half a million have stayed in Turkey. Only a small portion is to be found in Eastern Europe. You must check the facts before doing these statements!

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston 1300 is more than 300 years before the Separatists landed on Plymouth Rock & about 600 years before my ancestors came to America. If I am an American, they are certainly European...& I am an American. We are parsing. They all came from behind the former Iron Curtain...whether you want to call it Central or Eastern Europe. The way I know this is that Sarkozy & Berlusconi et al all want to send them back not to India, but to the former Communist countries from whence they came.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus You said Roma came from Eastern Europe, which they don't, and you didn't even mention Italy until now. Roma walked through Eastern Europe; they are constantly moving around. With this reasoning you could say they are from Scandinavia, which is absolutely ridiculous. You seem confused. Indicate if you speak about Roma in general or the French and Italian cases of illegal immigrants from mainly Romania? I know it can be hard for an American to understand the complex European continent

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus P.S. Just to help you to avoid offending, in particular, Hungarians, Czechs or Slovaks, never say that these countries are Eastern European - they are culturally and politically Central European. In particular coming from an Amercan it can be perceived in a very negative way, given that Churchill's call for continuing to Moscow was quashed by the US and thereby leaving these states to, what Rooseveld called, the "progressive state" of the Soviet Union. It's good to keep in mind.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus You have not answered to any questions about references or facts that I've put to you. All you're doing here is insinuating that ordinary Europeans are racists because they refuse uncontrolled/illegal immigration, demand as a minimum that people coming here are endorsing the fundamental principles governing our societies and oppose totalitarian ideologies to spread. This is not helpful and risk making the extreme right-wing forces grow among younger generations.

[saulpaulus]

@johanwinston Some ordinary Europeans...like some ordinary Americans ARE racists. And if they were not, we would not have the rise of right wing parties and laws against minarets and stuff. Sarrazin didn't just say that Muslims wouldn't integrate. He also said they were inherently stupid and apparently as many as 50% of Germans agreed with him. BTW, I am of German and Swiss German ancestry, so this is not bias on my part.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Ohh, there you have it. Oppressing the debate about immigration is the key explanation at the moment to the rise of extreme right-wing elements in Europe. For too long the racist stamp has been put in the forehead of anyone wanting to deal with the problems (which I hardly expect you to be aware of, since the welfare state context is very different from the US society). In the south of Sweden even Muslims voted for the right-wing Sverigedemokraterna to decrease immigration.

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Your general racist designation just don't work here. That's why I ask you specific questions, which you don't answer. Give me the exact quote of Sarrazin and where he expressed it. I know that he has pointed out that the culture of Islam nurtures stupidity. But it's quite obvious that a person who believes that all the answers could be found in the Coran and who rejects any critical thinking neglects his own intellect and falls into stupidity. Islam = submission = not questioning.

[johanwinston]

Svara på det här videoklippet... "BTW, I am of German and Swiss German ancestry, so this is not bias on my part." Well, I'm not talking about being biased or defending a country or an area. I'm talking about ideas and the CURRENT situation in Europe - of which you apparently know very little. Support your earlier statements - come on, put a little bit of effort into this and maybe you even get interested in and become knowledgeable about European politics. Who knows...

[johanwinston]

@saulpaulus Concerning the Mexican border issue, the same thing is going on in the Mediterranean Sea, but probably much worse, since entire families are risking their lives in small over-crowded boats to get into the EU; often people from south of Sahara. There is a great deal of support from the public for their right to seek asylum and have their case tested on EU soil. This issue, however, is different from the issue of Islam as a totalitarian ideology (sometimes the cause of emmigration).

[19834883]

@19834883 Europe's strength lies in diversity"! If you mix many colors in one pot you get always BROWN. The EU is Allready Death Iam Russian but Work in Germany, i now it, i here it every Year, The Dream of this Idiots how Sit in in Brussel is OVER, They Dont Want it, they dont need it, Every Country has his Cultur and this is good, forget what you and i Say, they already Hate the EU, Every boy or woman in germany or in a other nation, in 10 Years i EU Histry, LONG LIFE EUROPE Without EU

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 I am not saying that the EU is perfect, but it is that union that has kept Europe at peace for 65 years. It is a very worthwhile thing.

[19834883]

@saulpaulus WHAT FOR A BULLSHIT, They was a Time, Yourope has Live Without a union more than 600Years, so tont talk about Shit, The EU is the Idiology of the NAZIS, or the COMMUNISTS, To Be Free you dont need a Union. What ever, in not more than 10 years no body nows about EUdssr

[saulpaulus]

@19834883 Actually what for a fact acknowledged by pretty much all historians. Europe has had wars for hundreds of years but not since 1945.

[Dudtz]

Risen from the Ruins of The Palace of The Republic,the German Democratic Republic will rise!

Auferstanden aus Ruinen des Palastes der Republik, der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik wird steigen!

[saulpaulus]

Wenn Schweine fliegen können!

[Dudtz]

Humber Pig in einer C-130 fliegen.

[saulpaulus]

Wenn vierbeiner Schweine fliegen können!

[Dudtz]

Humber Pig in einer C-130 fliegen.

Die DDR war besser als in der EU.

[saulpaulus]

Die DDR ist besser fur die geshichte buchen.

[Dudtz]

Die DDR ist bees fur die Vergangenheit, presant und Zukunft.

[saulpaulus]

die DDR ist tot und begraben und sollte so bleiben

[Dudtz]

Die DDR ist nicht tot, nur subtiler.

[saulpaulus]

die DDR ist tot und begraben, und Sie können einer der einzigen Leute sein, der es verpasst.

[Dudtz]

Die DDR wird gerne von vielen Menschen.

[saulpaulus]

wer außer sich selbst?

[Dudtz]

Zum Beispiel,FDJ.

[saulpaulus]

Das ist eine echte Person?

[Dudtz]

Viele Menschen. Freie Deutsche Jugend

[saulpaulus]

Gemäß die welche wissenschaftliche Wahl?

[Dudtz]

Was zum Teufel? Wissenschaft?

Jetzt bin ich zu haben, um die Statistik? Haben Sie Ihre eigenen Forschung.

Du bist Faschist, oder?

[saulpaulus]

auf Englische: what scientific poll suggests that any significant number of people anywhere want the decayed corrupt police state that was the DDR and the Stasi to return?

[Dudtz]

Was Umfrage, warum das Vertrauen der Menschen mit den Umfragen? Was macht Sie glaube, die meisten Ostdeutschen sind zufrieden mit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der EU?

[saulpaulus]

So offensichtlich haben Sie keine Beweise, um Ihren Anspruch zu unterstützen, dass irgendwelche bedeutende Zahl von Leuten eine Rückkehr zur verfallenen und korrupten Regierung des DDR und des Stasi will?

[Dudtz]

Wo ist Ihr evedence?

Sind Sie eine Art von faschistischen Agenten?

[saulpaulus]

Meine Beweise für die populäre Unterstützung des gegenwärtigen Regimes in Deutschland sind, dass genau keiner in Deutschland für eine Rückkehr zum Polizeizustand von DDR agitiert, dass jemand, der unter dem Stasi Polizeizustand aufwuchs, jetzt Kanzler der BRD ist, und dass Sie noch sogar eine Person außer sich selbst nennen müssen, die denkt, dass der Stasi Polizeizustand eine gute Idee war.

[saulpaulus]

Und nein, bin ich nicht ein Faschist, aber Sie sind offensichtlich ein Kommunist oder ein kommunistischer Sympathisant, der wahrscheinlich keinen Hinweis hat, das welche Leben unter dem Stasi wirklich l war

[Dudtz]

Zunächst Stasi war nicht gemeinsame Polizei, sie waren ein Intelligenz Agentur

Die Volkspolezi war die regelmäßige Polizei.

[saulpaulus]

Ja, nur der Stasi behielt riesengroße Dateien ... nicht auf feindlichen Agenten, aber auf ihren eigenen Bürgern und Touristen wie ich.

[Dudtz]

Also? Die FBI-Dateien immer so.

[saulpaulus]

Das FBI behält Dateien im Interesse der Staatssicherheit. Sie beginnen nicht sogar, sich denjenigen des Stasi zu nähern, der Dateien behielt, um täglich Leben seiner Bürger zu kontrollieren.

[Dudtz]

Hah,fool!

Vielleicht Stasi-Akten aufbewahrt, um sicherzustellen, die nationale Sicherheit.

Und Sie wissen, nicht der US-Intellegence Services Telefon tippen Kontroversen?

[saulpaulus]

Der Stasi handelte, um die Leute des GRD zu kontrollieren, weil es ihnen nicht vertraute, und weil es keinen Bill von Rechten gab, sie zu schützen. Ja, ich bin mit den Abhören-Meinungsverschiedenhei­ten sehr vertraut. Wir besprachen sie gründlich auf dem Obama listserve. Als wir so im GRD getan hatten, der Stasi hätte uns angehalten.

[saulpaulus]

Fühlen Sie sich frei, Ihre Ansichten auszudrücken, aber ich muss darauf bestehen, dass Sie entweder von der stinkenden oder von perjorative Sprache Abstand nehmen.

[Dudtz]

Pejorative Sprache? Was?

Faschist, Sie sind bereits versucht, die Redefreiheit zu unterdrücken!

Doppel-Lautsprecher!

[saulpaulus]

Sie sind frei, jede Meinung zu äußern, die Sie auf meinen Videos wünschen. Sie sind nicht frei, Wörter wie Dummkopf zu verwenden, und ich glaube, dass Sie um den faschistischen ephithet einmal zu häufig ebenso geworfen haben. Wenn Sie außer Stande oder widerwillig sind, sich solcher Sprache zu enthalten, muss ich Sie blockieren.

[Dudtz]

What about using the term Betriebssozialismus insted?

Ja, Sie möchten Block mir, weil Sie nicht mögen freie Meinungsäußerung.

You may try to block me,but I can use other profiles.

Was ist mit euch, und das Doppel sprechen?

[saulpaulus]

Der freie Ausdruck der Meinung ist fein. Perjorative-Angriffe auf mich oder andere werden nicht geduldet und ... nötigenfalls... Ich werde Sie ebenso oft blockieren, wie ich dazu brauche.

[Dudtz]

Still the double speak.

You don't really believe in free speech,do you?

Be honest,please.

Dennoch ist die doppelte sprechen.

Es ist nicht wirklich glauben, in freier Rede oder?

Seien Sie ehrlich, bitte.

[saulpaulus]

Nicht doppelt sprechen überhaupt. Sie können die DDR und den Stasi loben, bis die Kühe nachhause kommen. Sie müssen gerade entweder vom Namenbenennen Abstand nehmen oder von Sprache verschmutzen. Zu Ihrem Kredit haben Sie das Namenbenennen aufgehört und haben keine stinkende Sprache verwendet. Solange das fortsetzt, gibt es kein Problem.

[Dudtz]

Oh what,do I have to say the politically correct words for you?

Ach was, muss ich sagen, dass die politisch korrekten Worte für Sie?

[saulpaulus]

Wenn durch politisch richtig Sie behandelnde andere mit einem minimalen Niveau der Rücksicht meinen, dann, Ja, das ist das, was ich will.

[Dudtz]

Aber Sie halten sich nicht an der freien Meinungsäußerung, wählen Sie bestimmte Wörter und beschriften sie als anstößig.

[saulpaulus]

Wenn Sie aufrichtig außer Stande sind, Ihre Meinungen ohne Beschimpfung und stinkende Sprache auszudrücken, dann ist der Mangel an der Freiheit innerhalb dessen.

[Dudtz]

Was Sie hier beleidigt?

Was macht Ihrer Meinung nach die Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ist so groß?

Sie haben nichts über die israelische RegierungTötung unschuldiger Plaestinians,aber sie sentance Erich Honecker zu prision für angeblich 192 Menschen getötet.

[saulpaulus]

Ihre Anmerkung war ein wenig hart zu folgen. Sie scheinen die Unterstützung von Frau Merkel für Israels Gaza Politik mit der Politik der Bundesrepublik zu Herrn Honecker zu vergleichen. Ich stimme mit Frau Merkel über Gaza auch nicht überein. Ich bin froh, dass unter der Bundesrepublik Deutsche frei sind, ihre Missbilligung der Behauptungen von Frau Merkel - einer Freiheit zu äußern, die sie unter Herrn Honecker nicht genoßen.

[Dudtz]

I was not specificaally refering to Merkel,but the FRG leadership in general,they arrest Erich Honecker for a supposed 192 people bbeing killed,but they do nothing to stop Israel from killing innocents.

Ich war nicht specificaally auf Merkel, aber die BRD Führung im Allgemeinen, sie Verhaftung Erich Honecker für eine angeblich 192 Menschen getötet bbeing, aber sie tun nichts zu stoppen Israel Tötung von Unschuldigen.

[saulpaulus]

Natürlich, wie wir beide wissen, hat Deutschland eine spezielle historische Beziehung mit Israel, das es ziemlich schwierig für einen deutschen Führer macht, Israel zu kritisieren. Auf jeden Fall sind die Palästinenser nicht deutsche Bürger, und keiner ist die Israelis. Die BRD hat keine gesetzliche Aufgabe, zu schützen oder Palästinenser oder Israelis für in einer anderen Rechtsprechung begangene Taten zu verfolgen. Derselbe trifft auf Herrn Honecker und seine Opfer nicht zu.

[Dudtz]

Die DDR war nicht die BRD die jurisdiction.What hat die Bundesrepublik Deutschland tun, um Stop-Massenmord in Kambodscha? Was haben sie getan aabout Myanmar reigime in Birma? Was haben sie getan reigime in der Volksrepublik China?

[saulpaulus]

In der Ansicht von der BRD gab es nur jemals das ein Deutschland, und so waren alle jene Opfer - und Herr Honecker - in ihrer Rechtsprechung, als die Verbrechen waren. Derselbe kann nicht für die anderen Angelegenheiten gesagt werden, dass Sie sich darauf beziehen, und Deutschland ist nicht eine Supermacht, wie die Vereinigten Staaten sind.

[Dudtz]

Sie Gefängnis Erich Honecker für angeblich 192 Menschen getötet, außerhalb der Zuständigkeit des BRD.If sie gehen ins Gefängnis Politiker aus Ost-Deutschland, für die Tötung angeblich peole, dann nicht, warum Menschen aus anderen Ländern?

[saulpaulus]

Auf welche Weise ist es außer ihrer Befähigung? Wie ich sage, haben sie immer Deutschland als ein und die Regierung von DDR angesehen, wie eine Entwicklung der Sowjets, während ihrig, immer die wahre deutsche Regierung war. Herr Honecker, ein Deutscher, beging so Verbrechen gegen seine Mitdeutschen auf dem deutschen Boden und fällt so unter der Rechtsprechung der BRD. Jene anderen tun nicht.

[Dudtz]

Das deutsche Reich hat ein Gebiet gehabt, in was jetzt die Leutrepublik von China ist, ist tthere Deutsch dort.

Hitler hat gesagt, dass etwas Scheiße um Deutsch unterdrückt zu werden in Sudatenland, bevor er hat lassen es anhängen.

The German Empire had a territory in what is now the Peoples Republic of China,tthere are Germans there.

Hitler said some crap about Germans being oppressed in Sudatenland,before he had it annexed.

[saulpaulus]

Wir sprechen über eine Kolonie oder über das Größere Deutschland nicht. Wir reden über das historische Deutschland ... Land und Leute, die dem ursprünglichen Reich gehören.

[Dudtz]

What about Sudatenland,and Hitler?

Was ist mit Sudatenland, und Hitler?

[saulpaulus]

Wie ich schon sagte, nicht sprechen Grosser Deutschland ... nur das Vaterland.

[Dudtz]

What?

[Dudtz]

Was?

[hartmut1164]

@saulpaulus

Welches "urspruengliche" Reich? Das HHR umfasste Teile Norditaliens, zeitweise Sued-Italien, waerend z.B. Flensburg nie dagehoerte? Das Reich von 1871? Mit seinen Minderheiten von unzufriedenen Polen, Daenen und Franzosen? Das Gebiet des Dt. Bundes? Oder welches?

[saulpaulus]

German is not my first language and, even after review, your question and what it relates to seem unclear. What is HHR? What does your question relate to? The video? Something in the comments?

[gigglepuff]

Cheers for this video it gave me a few ideas to research for my exam :P

[saulpaulus]

I have videos about the Marshall Plan and NATO that might also be relevant.

[hartmut1164]

I answered you remark regarding the "ursprüngliches Reich": My answer pointed out that the was never a thing like a "original empire" for the German. The Holy Roman Empire (Heiliges Roemisches Reich - HHR) was not a national state at all, neither was the German Federation (1815-1866) and the Syate founded in 1871 had significant minorities within its border and was quite short-lived too.

[saulpaulus]

You have an interesting site as well. You seem very creative. Anyway, I hope to post my response to the Davos question tomorrow. Look for it!

[madbcc]

thank you for sharing brother. all the best :DDD

[saulpaulus]

You are most welcome. Please look at as many of the videos as you can, esp those about Darfur.

[madbcc]

i will lol :DDD have fun