Added: 3 years ago
From: aliceinchainsPL
Views: 4,593
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • haahaah xD

  • I was wondering the same thing. I thought it would be a new song but it wasn't on the album.

  • Ok people! get something in your heads!

    the band`s name is ALICE IN CHAINS!!!

    Not LAYNE STALEY!

    Of course we all miss him but sometimes we have to go on!

    they are giving us a great gift to us...and it sounds so FAN like! but it`s the truth!

    enjoy the music...couse the new stuff sounds like something you don`t hear nowa days!

    They are back,man! i just can`t believe that

  • Julio Sabala????

  • Julio Sabala

  • With that flying V He looked like Lenny Kravits Lol

  • Speak for yourself. I have tons of doubt about DuVall. He sings like he has a vagina.

  • regardless of anyone's opinions of whether or not they should've changed the name of the band, i have no doubt that this album will be awesome. i'm gonna by it the day it comes out

  • Holy shit I recognize that studio, that's henson studios! I have a Production dvd that was filmed there that's funny as hell

  • best of luck to the band but honestly i can't stand the sound of william duvall's voice.

  • I agree with metorion. Seriously, Duvall is good. As met said, he is not replacing layne staley, not at all. Obviously he wont sound as good as Layne, but he still has a good voice. Layne would be happy. A true AIC fan would be glad for alice in chains with Duvall.

  • agreed man cant wait for the new record !

  • agreed 100% i love layne and wish he was still alive, but hes not and people need to get over it, duvall is a kick ass singer and definitely the next best thing to layne, and if your a hater of this new stuff your not a AIC fan, your jus a layne fan

  • I am genuinely shocked about how negative people are towards Duvall. He's not doing anything bad. He's a great singer, he's not replacing Layne. AIC are merely moving on to their second phase/era

  • Jerrys beard has to go - he looks like fricking Santa!! He is such good looking dude, without that ugly beard...

    *sniff*

  • OK, why don't we also see Jerry doing vocal tracking here? Does this mean it's going to be mostly William singing?

    God help us...

  • William is such a fucking funny guy man, I can't fucking wait!

  • Comment removed

  • FUCK YOU!!! your not an AIC fan you poser... laynes FUCKING DEAD... it sucks but it cant be reversed... it isnt williams fault... if someone walked up to you and said "hey you want to sing w/ jerry nd AIC?" youd shit yourself for the opertunity

  • Comment removed

  • well i guess you cant come up with anything to refute what ive said since all you can do is insult my user name ...good job capt/ dumbass... laynes fucking dead ... it sucks... get over it... theres nothing wrong with duvall at all .. your just mad because hes not layne.. well NO ONE is .. laynes dead and he tool 12 years of this bands future with him cuz he couldnt straighten out his life... i think they have the right to move on

  • Man, you are the 1st person (besides myself) who has actually summed up this whole messy business without all the sugar-coated bullshit most of these "fair-weather" AIC fans seem to think is appropriate. I mean, they fuckin' BEGGED Layne to come to the studio, to tour, to hang out, and to give up that evil shit he was so addicted to. And the name? If it was "owned" by Layne, or his family, or his ghost or whatthefuckever, then Jerry couldn't use it (without permission). Yet, he DOES use it...

  • lol well thanks... i get a lot of shit for having that point of view....but your right.. they did all they could to get him back but in the end he couldnt put down the needle. i think they deserve to keep going on as AIC... even if they dropped the name it would still be the sound of AIC.. so there is no point in changing the name,,,

  • yeah...because people know it. but in my opinion aic died with layne. this voice CAN't be replaced. and thats what they are trying to do. "replace". give this thing here a new name. I respect duvall. but this is not alice in chains, its just called that.

  • If it was the guitarrist or bassist, would you say the sme? Be honest please

  • no of course not...well...cantrell...maybe. the voice is almost always the most unique thing in a band...the trademark. ok there are guitarists with a similar recognition value (santana...who I HATE :-) or bassists (flea?)but mostly its the voice that matters most. anyway its layne who died and in my opinion replacing him just doesn't work.

  • No, you are wrong, every instrument is a trademark, but they just choosed to go on, what's the problem? Yeah, not the same, but whatever

  • "no you are wrong"? so you are my teacher now huh? dude..."the problem" is that I (myself) dont dig the new singer. and layne was my favorite singer. this tiny little problem is why to me its not the same band. in fact is it isnt.

  • Who didn't love that guy's voice? Lane Staley was the shit, but now he is gone, we can't have him back, and that's the truth. If Alice in Chains have a new singer, it will be a bit different, but he didn't take Lane's place, he fills an empty spot now... Just drop, I don't want to argue

  • I won't argue. this is my taste. to me the difference is huge.

  • Yeah, you probably shouldn't argue...especially when you don't even know the man's name is Layne, not Lane.

  • WTF?! Of course I do! I commited a mistake! What did I say bad?

  • William has a cool beard.

  • I CANT FUCKING WAIT!!!!!

  • hhhwwaaahaahaahaa!!

    hahaa

    hope the new albums good!

  • nice

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more