Dimitri Khalezov | 9/11 THE THIRD TRUTH | Part 1/2

[krisreckner]

Hes reading off the card!

[StollandSon]

Th only problem as far as his sequence of the collapse I have is that the pulverization starts at the top about 3/4's the way up and the top falls into that and then it all falls to dust. Other than that, his analysis - again as to the collapse - is as plausible as the other theories and explains far more than the others.

Even still, the accent cracked me up.

[StollandSon]

I think once he stopped speculating and talked about what he knows about blast zones, this was rather informative. I feel als though so far nobody, including the official story, has been able to account for everything that happened with regard to the actual collapse. Even if the jet fuel weakenedthe steal and that bought down the tower, it wouldn't have melting steel 3 months later. And the dust has never been sufficiently explained. (cont.)

[StollandSon]

Yakov Smirnoff on 9/11

In Russia, the buildings fly into the planes...what a country

sorry, nothing of value to contribute here, my bad, but this was sadly all that was going through my mind for the first 10 minutes of listening to this guy...Yakov Smirnoff has completely ruined my entire perception of the Russian accent.

[IranContraScumDid911]

There is only one truth ..... the third truth is not it. There were no nukes on 9/11.

[TheRangersLegend]

@IranContraScumDid911 Tell us then.....what is the truth?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@TheRangers The buildings turned to dust at a decent rate near freefall. A nuke at the base could not and would not create that effect. A nuke is one big explosion, uncontrolled. There are many explosions, not just one. The videos, eyewitnesses, and news reports all confirm this throughout the day. Multiple explosions after the towers collapsed for 1/2 hour. Multiple nukes? We all know how they demolish buildings, no need for some science fiction theories. Been to my channel?

[TheRangersLegend]

@IranContraScumDid911 Whatever the deal with 9/11, the truth will never come out. Whatever it may be. All we have is opinions.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@TheRangersLegend No we have fire chemistry, mechanical engineering, thermodynamics, gravitational acceleration, and the laws of motion. I know exactly what happened, no opinions. Straight out of the explosions section in any engineering manual. Opinion while ignoring science is the problem. I could tell you exactly what happened and how they did it, even who did what, without making up one part. I dont need theories or opinion, I use scientific benchmarks and historically agreed fact

[nickanaful]

There is physical evidence studied by scientists, engineers etc. Example of an opinion is there may have been digital manipulation involved during the blackouts and cutting back to live feed of real explosions in the buildings. Not sure how that works, but a filmmaker or news anchor would have a good opinion. (HAHA) I'm reading the authors PDF, sometimes you need to read instead of listening.

[mel8630]

@IranContraScumDid911 , you do realize that not all nuclear bombs are created equal right? The size of a small nuclear device could much more easily be smuggled onto an aircraft, than a conventional explosive compound device. Do you realize how much conventional explosive it would take in order to take out those towers? Those towers were built so they wouldn't collapse in the event some sort of catastrophic event happened. So not only would they require a very high amount

[mel8630]

So not only would they require a very high amount of conventional explosive compound, but they would also have to be strategically placed. Unfortunately I can't explain everything I want to due to the limitations of these comment sizes.

[mel8630]

Anyway the point is they wouldn't have been able to smuggle the amount of C4 or any other conventional compound in order to level those buildings onto those planes. But they could however smuggle enough nuclear type compound, because it doesn't require near as much....

[mel8630]

I'm not saying I think this guy is correct though, because I haven't even watched the entire video. I have a hard time wanting to waste 4 hours of my life, just to hear this guy's version. It's not like it's a big secret that the government lies about damn near everything. I've got my own personal grievance with the governments lies. I want the truth about aliens and bigfoot dammit!!!

[IranContraScumDid911]

@mel8630 In science we take the most obvious and focus on that first. How do they demolish buildings in reality? I can EASILY disprove this theory. The buildings blew into dust within a second of freefall speed. When you have a building falling and crushing down the energy available is mass and velocity. Since the mass turns to dust we should see a velocity loss equal to the energy consumed. There is little velocity loss meaning there was no crush down. Many small blasts not one biggie

[IranContraScumDid911]

@IranContraScumDid911 A top down decending sequenced controlled demolition on the exterior after blowing the top hat truss connection on "impact". The core demonstrated equlibrium of motion, then implodes into itself in FOUR (thats 4 loud audible explosions). The problem with Khazelavs theory is that the building explodes at the top, not from the base. The building fails to sink even 1 foot. A nuke is large and sloppy, the towers were surgically sequenced and controlled.

[ludmilalloyd]

@IranContraScumDid911 And you are scienist of.... geology, thermonuclears, anything??? No?

Look at the pics of hole after remains of the ruins were taken out. See the lines on the groundmassess going by circles?

It was granite before..Melting temperature is 1215 - 1260 °C. Go to Central Park study how granite looks, there are open granite rocks out there.

Only nuclear explosions could melt it & change the structure of its porphiric texture.

[man1192803]

@IranContraScumDid911

Lol, who the heck are you?

Why do you think you have ANY credibility on this issue?

Identify yourself and give us your version on TV. Otherwhise you're just talking SHIT.

This guy was a nuclear intelligence officer for crying out loud, and you are questioning his professionalism?

Bye bye naive loser.

For people who want to know who are behind the 9/11 'truth' movement:

/watch?v=xbY5_qtz83M

They're all CIA/NSA employees who distorted the truth.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@man1192803 You are looking for a star, a person to believe in. Dumbass. Try using the laws of motion, written by Isaac Newton 400 years ago and never disproven. Thats as credible as you can get. The laws of motion alone disprove this idiot theory. Case study and engineering tells us how they demolish buildings. We see the effects, properties, and results we should from explosives planted throughout the building. The high velocity dust and ejecta should tell a troll like you more than one blast

[MrBullfrog9876]

This is so much more believable then Judy Woods Space Ship shoots unknown microwave and "dustifies" everything! “Where did the towers go?" she asks. They went into the crater underground.

[stonebrownalien]

This is by far the best video about the towers that I have ever seen! this seems to be so accurate to what happened to those buildings.

[doughauf]

@mickymacky02 directed energy weapon

[rusmalbel]

What about the perpe-TRATORS?

THOSE WHO PERPETRATED THE 9/11 EVENTS ...

When shall we hear the RIGHTFUL ENDING of the 4 hours' preliminations.

NWO what is it (who are they)?

A gentle sobriquet (nickname) for jewish tribe of banksters and war-mongers. They did eat IRAQ and Afganistan ... Who's next

Or shall we kill all the israeli beasts inside the USA in order not to be misguided once again instead of safely conducting them to ISRAEL after they performed the 9/11show. SMALL OR BIG HOPE.

[voodoowichdoctor]

watch videos of the towers under construction, the outside is virtually armour plate. there is no way an aluminium plane would have passed through. an armour piercing bullet is made of tungsten and travels twice the speed of sound.

[LucidDreamTricks]

Is there anywhere to buy the full book? His forum appears to be abandoned and he's not answering emails.

[Ghenghy]

OK, that makes perfect sense. But this guy is full of shit when he says the government was a "victim" and wasn't involved. It could NOT have happened without their involvement! Of course it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, but if it was launched in an "attack" the where is the goddamn retaliation? Who do we retaliate against, OURSELVES??? The military was on total stand down that day and the WH lied about no planes at Langley, the fucking Patriot Act was on the House floor on 9/14 . Lies!

[TheRangersLegend]

@Ghenghy He dosn't say the US governement was not involved but rather it as a whole was not solely responsible. Obviously corrupt elements on the inside were involved but the term 'inside job' is inaccurate when referring to who was to blame. Khalezov states that manipulation through blackmail means retaliation was not an option. The American government is just a side show, they have no power or influence. Most of them will be as much in the dark as we are about what happened.

[Ghenghy]

@TheRangersLegend Yes he did, he's very clear about that. "The US government was not a perpetrator, they were the vicitm."

[TheRangersLegend]

@Ghenghy Yes the US government, like the people of America, as a whole, were a victim off an attack. Although they are guilty of many things and they shot themselves in the foot by covering it up and blaming it on middle eastern terrorists. To think Bush and Cheney were involved in this is just a ludicrous diversion away from what may be the truth.

[Ghenghy]

@TheRangersLegend 9/11 simply does not happen without the cooperation and foreknowledge of the government and military. The military was on stand down that day and those orders came directly from Rumsfeld and Cheney, that is a fact. You cannot fire missiles at the fucking Pentagon without setting off an immediate chain reaction, that didnt happen. Khalezov says the NWO ordered it, OK, well who the fuck do you think we report too? Of course Bush knew, its ludicrous to think otherwise!

[TheRangersLegend]

@Ghenghy I understand where your coming from but I believe Khalezov means that the organisations he states carried out the attack have influence over these people. Using blackmail to basically make them dance when they see fit. They have all these people in the palm of their hand and can force them to go against the principles of their own positions in government to service them. Bush would have known something, I doubt he knew the full plot though buts thats just my opinion.

[Ghenghy]

@TheRangersLegend Khalezov is just another disinfo agent, some good information, lots of info that just doesnt fit. Anybody that doesnt think the WH was complicit hasnt studied the tape from Bush's "Goat" adventure, or the timeline of all the planted evidence, or thinks that its perfectly normal for Atta to check his bag for a one way flight that miraculously DIDNT make it on the plane. There's your evidence. Everything the government did was pre=orchestrated, they cant move that fast;

[annebeck58]

@Ghenghy Lots of info that doesn;t fit? what would that be?

this is a crack=up. Oh, I get that you are frustrated he isn't writing you back/  think about that.

why do you think that is?

[LucidDreamTricks]

@TheRangersLegend Reading between the lines on his forum I think he puts the blame on Freemasons.

Whether that's true or not, I'm not sure how he can make such a clear distinction between Freemasons and the US government. Surely there are Freemasons in the govt itself.

It's not quite as black and white as he makes it.

[TheRangersLegend]

@LucidDreamTricks He does point the finger at the freemasons but also mentions others. Yes I believe there are freemasons in the US government but it really doesn't mean anything as not all freemasons are on the same page so to speak but if there is freemasonic enities sitting high up in the us government then it would be safe to assume they would have had a level of involvment from inside. Like what Ghenghy mentioned about the stand down, they need inside cooperation for that to work I guess.

[annebeck58]

@TheRangersLegend Not exactly. I know who he blames. it is who I also blame. I have it in his words, directly, and he has not waivered, nor said anything different.

Why are you asking someone not dimitri what has been said and what Dimitri said??

[ludmilalloyd]

@Ghenghy Right. Milloins thing - fake videos for TV news, fake witnesses, blocking all military defence systems around Pentagon and whole country & so on but poor government was not awered?! Than who is a really governing US.

[mp9mah]

@Ghenghy Speak the truth brother and let other people know. U have no idea how many people are still oblivious, even after all these years.

[LucidDreamTricks]

Very interesting how it explains why the bottom of the towers were dustified but not the top. That seems somewhat more consistent than the directed energy weapons theory and much more satisfying than the thermite theory.